cynthia smith also johns joins in the request for discretionary review it's adjacent to the property on the south side. >> she's been considered to be part of the dr staff. >> so there's an opportunity for a response and rebuttal if you so diver the two of you could share that time. okay now project sponsor your team has 5 minutes >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and commissioners i'm david silverman i'm working with the family that has lived on the property for over 28 years. i'm not sure what the speakers were talking about. mr. lindsey stated in his opening comments that the properties are awe aligned with the two adjacent properties in the rear so the bump out that's going to ruin the open spaces is a fancy. the purpose of the project is to add approximately one hundred and 10 square feet at the level and one hundred and 16 square feet at the third level for a grand total of 2 hundred and 26 square feet with a change in the roofline to make the change more usable. the garage is behind is wasted space that will be enclosed that's going to improve the homes functionality

year and a request for discretionary review was filed by the miller mick kinss to the north and cynthia smith to the south. since the packet ways sent to the commission we've received an additional e-mail from christen this would be in support of dr request and i believe this e-mail was sent to each of the commissioners within did last couple of days. i'll pass this. the concerns raised in the dr request include the following. loss of light and shadowing to neighborhoods property and loss of mid plain clothes open space and visual openness and the fact it is out of schedule and characterly out of scale. the vice president reviewed it and determined the project meets the standards of residential guidelines in that the light loss and additional shadowing are within reasonable exception of the development impacts and the proposed you you are talking about e debt has minimal effects on the block spates. in conclusion the department finds is to be inconsistent with within the guidelines and didn't create extraordinary circumstances we ask for your approval that concludes my presentation >> thank y