in texas wascuit not just daca, it was extended daca. >> that it itself extended the age of daca eligibility. thethe length of the, length of time between registration. >> ds, but there were two -- yes, but there was a distinctive daca component. it was the fifth circuit's decisions to cast light on that view of daca, i think that is incorrect. counsell protection, says there has been enough to create a plausible inference of a negative attitude. now, that is not a standard i believe can be found anywhere determining and reviewing the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. >> what would this be? >> i believe the standards is clear evidence. c makes clear that in the immigration context in particular, the standard is extremely high and the idea that you could go and proceed to get discovery on the basis of a plausible inference, which we exists, even if you think you had a plausible inference that would not be enough to survive a motion to dismiss. sel can all that coun even claim for it. that is entirely right, there has been no suggestion that either secretary duke or secretary nielsen has a

where daca recipients do not. we think that is flawed but that does not apply to the daca program. there's no reason the government can cite texas as if it applies to this program or if that explains why daca is unlawful. it doesn't. it explained at most why dapa is unlawful. i see my red light has been on. >> it has. is there a subject you have not touched on that you wish to argue? >> no, i don't believe so. thank you very much. >> thank you. we'll hear the other counsel for vidal. good morning. >> good morning, your honors. may it please the court. with the national immigration center on behalf of the plaintiffs. i want to step back to discuss the heart of this injunction. the equitable factors. bouncing the imminent irreparable harms plaintiffs would have faced without this injunction against the government's interest in initiating a termination other daca revision could not. defendant do not dispute by ending daca they put a harm on hundreds of thousands of daca recipients, communities, employers and their relatives. since 2012, daca provided hundreds of thousands of daca reci

favor of daca. those states sued the trump administration to keep the program open arguing that he didn'td go through the proper process in reviewing the program. and basically they prevailed at the federal district court level. there was an injunction placed last year on the daca program's termination meaning it would stay open for the time being and people who have the benefit now can reaplay but it's not taking any new applicants. we're at that level now and then just this weekend the supreme court refused to b take up the case meaning it's probably going to be another year before daca could actually be terminated. >> and finally president trump's offer on reopening the government, your understanding of its impact on the daca program in terms of what's on the table. >> sure. so if we think about the supreme court probably won't rulee for another year. so i daca is probably in place r a year or maybe more. and the president is offering three years. so he's basically offering an additional maybe tw

>> any action on daca? >> yes, correct. >> yes, i think we assume that the supreme court will have the final say. if there isn't legislation. but my understanding is they don't necessarily have to take up the case either. they can always let a lower court ruling stand. clearly they could rule that the president has the authority. after all, daca was an executive action of the obama administration. there's a valid argument that the trump administration has the authority to end the program that another president started that did you want have congressional legislation behind it. but on the other hand, they could also argue that the process by which they did it wasn't a correct process. that's been used for affordable care act and other issues as well. so i can see the supreme court going either way on this. once the supreme court rules, if they say the program can be determine nated, that's the end of the program if there isn't legislation. >> object the migration policy institute's website, plenty of tools t

[habla en inglÉs] >> varios republicanos ya habÍan mostrado su intenciÓn de ampliar "daca". pero la cÁmara baja no la apoyarÁ. donald trump quiere $5,000,000,000 para seguridad fronteriza, pero el costo del moro es mÁs caro. todos lo saben, los muros funcionan y necesitamos mÁs muros. los demÓcratas responden que estÁn a favor de la seguridad fronteriza, pero que el muro es ineficaz. lo primero es abrir el gobierno para algunos y despuÉs negociar. los jÓvenes amparados bajo "daca" y tps? desde los Ángeles juan carlos gonzÁlez tiene respuestas. juan carlos: una extensiÓn de tres aÑos para los beneficiarios de "daca", a cambio de que se aprueben los fondos para el muro fronterizo. >> es una propuesta que no es aceptable debido a que no es una soluciÓn permanente. >> el muro es un gasto de miles de millones de dÓlares. juan carlos: quÉ parece si la propuesta incluye la residencia permanente? orlando que estÁ casado y tiene dos hijos ciudadanos dice que su postura es la misma. >> no es aceptable porqueintercambia. nos intercambia por un muro. juan: paulina opina que sÓlo respald

daca program. coming in to this country are contributing members of society. we cannot allow these people just to run amok. ed: very well said in fact. >> my thought has completely gone from my. ed: your point, we understand it fully. and i want to bring it fully because here you are as an angel mom standing up for daca children, people brought here illegally by their parents. they're here, some going to school, some serving in our military, but we forget to mention your son served his country, our country, he was a police officer killed by an illegal immigrant. he was driving drunk, this illegal immigrant, two or three times the legal limit and was high on meth. democrats don't want to talk about that, marianne. but why is it that your son served our country, he's tragic tragically killed by an illegal immigrant. why won't nancy pelosi sit down with you, look you in the eye and say "your child matters just like the daca children"? >> there's so much compassion in her voice when she talks about the

recipients, temporary status for daca extension.s for humanitarian and drug detection program, all for his border wall. the democrats don't see it as a deal. as of now, he doesn't have any votes, maybe one or two, but this will probably fall apart in the senate. now the republicans have a proposal, they can talk about how the democrats are opposing something and that's basically what they've been dealing with for the last four weeks. the democrats say, look, we've been offering clean proposals to reopen the government. once it's passed, we'll be happy to talk about border security. we talked abo they are still going to say they're not funding a border wall to make a point. so long as the republicans and democrat leaders don't talk or move from their current positions, nothing will happen right now. the question is can they keep this up for long? >> come back to us if there's any news. joining our conversation is my panel. 1,300 pages. as phil said, they put some disaster relief in here, they put some things in that congress should p

the second is the supreme court's not going to take up daca. so there's a whole year at least before this becomes a pressing issue. and, you know, trump's reaction is i'll deport 11 million people, which, you know, is ridiculous. so i think the democrats will stand firm on we have comprehensive immigration, that's the price now for this. but comprehensive immigration is not going to get done overnight so let's open the government and then we'll start the conversation. >> the idea that it's a temporary exzblengs yes. >> extension, means three years from now you're in the same boat. >> the other part of this is that the president, not only is this a nonstarter for democrats, but the fact this is not sitting all that well with all republicans, specifically on the far right, that's not helping the president who going into this proposal as we know from this reporting in the "washington post" and others has been looking at the numbers and realizes he's not looking good in this. >> that's right. every time you seem to get to a point, and, again, the d

you'll be having daca, and you'll be putting other things with daca. hopefully by that time, the wall will be well under construction. just a little statement on that, we've already built a lot of the wall. we've been working very, very hard. we've renovated a tremendous amount of wall. i just told you we did a lot of wall in san diego, where we needed it very badly, where they wanted it very badly. so we haven't been sitting still for the first, believe it or not, less than two years. we've been working very, very hard. the wall is -- we've done a lot of miles of wall already. we're not just starting off fresh. we have large numbers of miles that we have to do. we can't let gaps. if you have gaps, those people are going to turn their vehicles, or the gangs will be coming in through the gaps. we cannot let that happen. kevin, kevin, kevin. >> thank you, mr. president. appreciate that. question about government emp y employe employees. what is your personal message to those who are impacted by the shutdown? if you wouldn't mind, if you could comment on

then there's the daca element. democrats and even trump himself have previously moved away from a temporary extension of protection for daca recipients because that very issue has moved into the court system, but the real reason this deal is no deal, it comes at the end of a very bad week for the president. as the very real shutdown affects come into sharp focus and the white house struggles to spin this in their favor, this deal seems more like a distraction and less like a real solution. just look at the president's very bad week. there were those shutdown polls, all of them, which showed american placed the blame for the government shutdown squarely on the shoulders of president trump. these are just four of the polls. it was also a week of terrible optics and terrible pain. the u.s. coast guard became the first branch of the military to go without pay as a result of a government shutdown more than 40,000 members of that service branch got no paycheck on friday. some were told to hold garage sales to make some e

and it was about daca. but she comes out against the president's proposal, which is reasonable, which finds common ground. build the wall, take care of the daca kids. all for what? something for everybody, which i think america is looking for. it's only the president who is leading and trying to end this shutdown when the speaker's totally acting a total different way. >> sean: thank you, kevin mccarthy, for being with us. we'll watch this very closely. when we come back, he's also a lawyer, senator lindsey graham on nancy pelosi's state of the union stunt. plus, the growing radicalism of the democratic party and what they stand for, or don't stand for, straight ahead. ♪ -here comes the rain. [ horn honking ] [ engine revving ] what's that, girl? [ engine revving ] flo needs help?! [ engine revving ] take me to her! ♪ coming, flo! why aren't we taking roads?! flo. [ horn honking ] -oh. you made it. do you have change for a dollar? -this was the emergency? [ engine revving ] yes, i was busy! -24-hour roadsid

and it was about daca. but she comes out against the president's proposal, which is reasonable, which finds common ground. build the wall, take care of the daca kids. all for what? something for everybody which i think america is looking for. it's only the president who is leading and trying to end this shutdown when the speaker's totally acting a total different way. >> sean: thank you, kevin mccarthy, for being with us. >>> when we come back, he's also a lawyer, senator lindsey graham on nancy pelosi's state of the union stunt. plus, the growing radicalism of the democratic party and what they stand for or don't stand for straight ahead. started searching for her words. and my brother ray and i started searching for answers. (vo) when it's time to navigate in-home care, follow that bright star. because brightstar care earns the same accreditation as the best hospitals. and brightstar care means an rn will customize a plan that evolves with mom's changing needs. (woman) because dad made us promise we'd kee

hilario yanezjoins us, daca recipient. think of this latest report coming out of washington that daca is off the table? >> my life is in limbo. i've been in the united states my entire life, it is my only country. i would really want to see congress and the president fix this issue once and for all. heather: give us background on your story, when did you come here and all that. >> i came here when i was a-year-old. my mother did. i grew up homeless, without a father in my life, i grew up in a rough neighborhood. despite the consensus i was given i'm glad god gave me the opportunity, i believe in jesus christ, believe in working hard so now i am a first-generation college student working for a fortune 500 company and i love this country with all my heart. if given the chance to serve in the military i would take it immediately. heather: in terms of the daca issue this is not an issue that just began with donald from, you hear democrats saying he changed what president obama put forth so this is his problem to begin with but

ahead of daca recipients. ahead of border security.of stable and protectable government funding. >> reporter: democratic leaders are rejecting the president's proposal and pushing their own bill which passed in the house through february 8th to get congress more time to negotiate. senate minority leader chuck schumer said white house's plan, it was not included in the discussions. >> there were no serious negotiations with democratic leaders or any democrat to produce this proposal. the president didn't ask what democrats needed in the bill, he laid his proposal down on the table. and proclaim the compromise. >> if they get more democratic support for the bill to pass, no sure thing. it would head over to the house and put pressure on nancy pelosi for a vote on it even if it doesn't have much chance of passing. all of this is movement but no indication the showdown will be over anytime soon. rob: steny hoyer is breaking away from house speaker nancy pelosi, the top democrats saying he's willing to have donald to give his state of the u

what democrats said is it's not just daca recipients, it's daca parents.ould have applied who didn't apply. all the sudden the population became far bigger. this is a different deal. he's saying i will protect those who were in our country, who were born in our country, born to illegal parents but here working getting permits. that's a smaller population. >> congressman, you were part of that. >> what i've always supported -- here's what i've always supported from the very, very beginning. nearly 20 years ago, a dream act. a clear path to american citizenship. what they offer is what's called the bridge act. it's a bridge to uncertainty. why don't we allow them to completely integrate themselves into our society? i want to make this clear to the american public. they haven't gone through one criminal background check by the fbi. they've gone through several criminal background checks. members of the tps, temporary protective community, they've gone through numerous background checks. they are working. they are contributing. they've shown exactly what every

ahead of daca recipients, head of border security and ahead of government funding. is that really a price that democrats want to play to prolong this episode, which they say they want to be over and done with is their plan truly to throww daca recipients, customs and border control under the bus just to extend this round of political theater? so they can look like champions of the so-called resistance. well, that is what some leading democrats try to assert right out of the gate before they even studied the president's new proposal. speaker pelosi came out a right away and tried to rally your troops. she neatly describeid the president proposals as unacceptable. wow, that's not exactly surprising considering just a few weeks ago the speaker went and declared the physical border security is on its face and immorality? mr. president, they don't see it that way and how could they? one democrat from the state of washington admitted the wall is not in itself a bad idea. another from illinois and asserted if we have a partial wall, fencing, technology to keep our borders

reporter: two questions, to followup on daca, are you open to a path to citizenship in theory, for daca recipients, and then can you explain to federal employees of the agencies that are closed which are not homeland security why those agencies should stay closed? homeland security is significant in of itself staying closed. president trump: because we want to do what's right and we want to do it all at one time. we don't want to do it in pieces. daca will be a great subject. i look forward to discussing it. we'll discuss it at another time. there are a lot of great things that can happen with daca if the democrats want to do that. i think what we're all waiting for, to be honest, is the supreme court judges, the supreme court justices' ruling in a not very long period of time. as you know, it's up now, hopefully, will be making a -- they will be making a ruling maybe sometime in the summer. so i think before we discuss too much daca, i would like to see what happens. i think it's very important decision. because frankly if they rule the way it is, it gives the president too much power.

you'll be having daca and you'll be putting other things with daca. hopefully by that time the wall will be well under construction. we have already built a lot of the wall. we've been working very hard. we renovated a tremendous amount of wall. i told you we did a lot of wall in san diego where we needed it very badly. so we haven't been sitting still for the first believe it or not less than two years. we've been working very, very hard. the wall is -- we've done a lot of miles of wall already. so we're not just starting fresh. but we have large numbers of miles that we have to do. we can't let gaps. if you have gaps, those people will turn their vehicles or the gangs -- they'll be coming in through the gaps. we can't let that happen. kevin. >> thank you, mr. president. i appreciate that. question about government employees. what is your personal message to those who are impacted by the shut down and if you wouldn't mind, if you could comment on the remarks made by a freshman congress person about impeachment involving a bit of profanity last night.

in return i would give pelosi the daca. let her do the daca thing and i would add to that the prescription drug bill that the democrats have been wanting, they can negotiate the price of medicare drugs and they can import drugs from canada. so the price will come down. people are hurting out here on these prices. they're ridiculous. $300, $400, $500 co-pays and they can't make the payments. senior citizens are suffering. people can't get insulin. trump could come out a hero in this and reverse his bad numb s numbers. >> yes, that's a good idea. the shutdown is related to all government funding so i don't see why they couldn't try that. i don't see it happening for the same reasons i mentioned earlier, democrats don't want to give trump any kind of win on the wall and trump is his and the to give them a win on daca because then a good portion of his base will attack him for amnesty. it's interesting to see a large portion of trump's base, including early supporters like ann coulter and some other -- i'll call them extreme co

you heard 20, 25 billion in daca. what happened, when a judge incredibly, because it was incredibly, i will say wrong decision, in fact president obama, when he signed the daca with the executive order, made a statement to the effect, this isn't going to work. and some judge from the ninth circuit, here we go again, upheld it. then it was upheld bit ninth circuit appellate. and now it is going before the united states supreme court and hopefully that will be properly ajudicated because if it is, talks will begin on larger immigration matters, having to do with daca, having to do with other things. so that is taking place. we may add a few things on to our discussions over the weekend but i'm going to ask mike pence, then i will have leader mccarthy say a few words. we'll take a couple questions. we're proud of the jobs and job numbers, that was incredible. and i think i will be even more proud if we could have great border security for the first time in really the history of our country. the southern border is a dange

. >> president trump seems to have flinched first making an offer to democrats on daca but is it an offer they can't refuse. to sort through the politics let me bring in cnn political commentary republican strategist doug high and democratic strategist basil smikle. you heard jim hines right here seconds ago. you want your reaction to his take which was that he actually heard a lot of movement in trump's speech, sort of the walking back from the sea to shine seawall. >> sure. >> did you hear those high notes as well? >> i've heard them but i heard them before because he used to talk about a wall and he moved to border security and now he's offering us this deal. the truth is -- >> but is that progress? >> i don't think so only because you can't trust it. that's the problem and for democrats, this is a tough situation, too, because daca's very important -- it's very important to the country but certainly important to us. >> yes. >> we were at the precipice of this before we fell off that cliff. we're not -- it didn't get done, but and the truth is, accepting a wall is really a proxy for ac

reporter: two questions, to followup on daca, are you open to a path to citizenship in theory for daca recipients and then can you explain to federal employees of the agencies that are closed which are not homeland security why those agencies should stay closed? homeland security is significant of itself staying closed. president trump: we want to do what's right and we want to do it all at one time. daca will be a great subject. i look forward to discussing it. we'll discuss it at another time. there are a lot of great thens that can happen with daca if the democrats want to do that. i think what we're all waiting for to be honest is the supreme court judges, the supreme court justices' ruling in a not very long period of time. s you know, it's up now, hopefully, will be making a ruling maybe sometime in the summer. so i think before we discuss too much daca, i would like to see what happens. i think it's very important decision. because frankly if they rule the way it is, it gives the president too much power. can you imagine me saying that? but i would be entitled to the same power.

i talked daca. >> the president a cabinet meeting at the white house, later gathering with republicanratic leaders, this doesn't result in a compromise with you decide. >> they want to leverage the shutdown into their proposals on border security. we believe hours is better but to use the shutdown as hostage which they had no argument against is wrong. >> the kind of proposal you would expect if incoming house democrats were choosing to stage a political starch a rather than doing the hard work of helping the country. >> reporter: not all was lost, the president invited congressional democrats and republicans back to the white house tomorrow for additional talks. heather: we will see if they get anywhere. lawmakers are back to square one on the shutdown. it is because democrats would rather derail any shred of progress than accept the crisis at the border. >> the president opened the meeting and turned to secretary nielsen, introduced her and said now she's going to begin her briefing. within 5 seconds chuck schumer prompted nancy pelosi to cut her off. have they listened, have been a

galo: daca sigue vigente.erales parÁ que eventualmente llegue a la corte suprema. pero podrÍa demorar de 10 a 12 meses. galo: el ser beneficiario de daca es vivir entre la incertidumbre. a pesar de que este fallo todavÍa otorga a los soÑadores permisos de trabajo y una protec móÁs temprano que tarde la corte suprema pod >> definitivamente se afrontan dÍa a día ciertas limitaciones para el desarrollo a nivel personal y profesional. pero creo que solamente nos da mÁs fuerza p admiten que este litigio legal ha confundido a los soÑadores y muchos , como adriÁn, piden que se aclaren las cosas. >> vivimos en esa incertidumbre de no poder planearnuestro futuro, aunque hemos vivido acÁ desde que somos chicos. galo: el presidente donald trump hace pocos dÍas ofreciÓ la reinstalaciÓn de daca por tres aÑos a cambio de 5000 millones de dÓlares para la construcciÓn del muro. >> pierde fuerza su oferta. Él ofreceuna extensiÓn tambiÉn del tps. galo: el presidente trump intento poner fin a daca en 2017, pero cortes judiciales

que con su estatus y beneficio de daca puede tener esta licencia o identificación regular. >> vamosde regresar. >> un residente permanente tiene derechos al estar fuera de estados unidos, solo debe tener su tarjeta de residencia permanente válida y vigente, y tener su pasaporte vigente, si un residente permanente toma un viaje más de seis meses por de estados unidos, o más de un año, corre el riesgo, hay reglas diferentes. >> allí están las respuestas, gracias patricia por acompañarnos, si tiene dudas puede llamarnos y dejarnos su pregunta que puede ser respondida el próximo viernes de inmigración. >> autoridad es universitarias quieren darle herramientas a los jóvenes dreamers para que continúen con sus estudios. >> en este portal de internet, los estudiantes pueden encontrar una asesoría financiera, los directivos del universidad busca ayudar a la comunidad. >> quiere tres semanas desde que abrió el portal. >> bajo daca los dreamers no pueden solicitar fondos federales. >> es una solicitud que se hace por escrito, es a través del estado. >> las inscripciones están abiertas todo el

you heard 20 and 25 billion in daca. what happened is when a judge incredibly because it was an incredibly i will say wrong decision, in fact president obama when he signed the daca with the executive order made a statement to the effect this isn't going to work. and some judge from the ninth circuit, here we go again, upheld it. and then it was upheld by the ninth circuit appellate and now it's going before the united states supreme court and hopefully that will be properly adjudicated because if it is, talks will begin on larger immigration matters having to do with daca, having to do with other things. so that is taking place. we may add a few things on to our discussions over the weekend, but i'm going to ask mike pence and then we'll take a couple of questions. but we're very proud of the jobs and job numbers. that was incredible. i think i'll be even more proud if we can have great border security for the first time in really the history of our country, the southern border is a dangerous, horrible disaster. we've d

for border security, but also dealing with daca. is daca important? i believe it is. the speaker of the house last year, nancy pelosi, she holds the record for the longest speech ever given on this house floor. t was over daca that she was shutting the government down for. both challenges are out there. find an opportunity to solve this and put the american public first. but what is the answer? first play the federal employees and second, to close early and go home. i'm staying this weekend. i'm requesting that the leaders get together tomorrow, all of us, stay in the room until we solve this problem. the president is right. it only takes 45 minutes. the president is right found two issues out there that both parties care about. he is correct that our government is designed to find common ground and not one person can always have their way. unfortunately, i think the speaker thinks differently. there was a low point in american history tore the speaker of the house to uninvite the president of the united states. low point that we are still shut down. even lower that p

deep dive into the daca program is the topic.hrough the timeline of actions by the trump administration on the daca courtm living up to the cases we heard about this week. guest: during the campaign, president trump and many other republicans in congress refer to this as an unconstitutional executive power grab. to pass thisfailed on the president issued, through but, as ave action candidate and as president, trump has referred that some immigrants are more deserving than others because they have more education or more productivity and the daca group fits that definition pretty well. for about a year, there wasn't any action on daca and , because i think some states said they would sue to stop the program which forced the president's hand and that's when he announced the termination of daca. in this polarized environment, we have some states that were against daca and some that were in favor. they sued the trump administration to keep the program open. they said he did not go through the proper procedure to review the program and

as far as daca.hen they were negotiating about the wall before, democrats wanted 800,000 to be taken care of and trump offered $1.8 million at that point when he did that. i remember president obama shutting down the government when he was trying to get the affordable care act taken care of. the bottom line is democrats don't want a wall. pelosi was going to head out of town for another week. if democrats were so concerned about these people being out of work, why would she leave the country for seven days? keep the last ditch to people at the bottom rung of the ladder unemployed and the wages low. the only people illegals hurt our working-class people that are lower rung. since trump has given them unemployment and raised their wages, it is the last opportunity for democrats to keep folks like that enslaved and keep them living in poverty. host: some of the activity taking place in the senate -- this deals with the topic of drug prices. legislation sponsored by the senate finance committee chairman

the other part is the president took the daca away. it already had been given some protection by the last administration. the president took it away. now he's saying if you give me 5.7 billion, i'll will give it back. this is not a good way for us to run the government. look, we all have to give something. democrats are wanting to give -- >> neil: let me ask you this, congressman. you try to be level-headed about this, trying not to get too extreme. but do you think as nancy pelosi does that a wall, any wall, is immoral? >> no,an inanimate opt can't be more or immoral. >> neil: if she were open to a wall and the president were open on daca, you might say re-visiting old positions, then we have the makings of a potential agreement here, right? >> well, yes. the problem, of course, is, you know -- goes back to the first point i made. why would we want to trust the president unless mitch mcconnell or somebody comes up and says i guarantee that this deal is going to be signed by the president. because we've been that place before. >> neil:

because you'll be having daca, and you'll be putting other things with daca. hopefully by that time, the wall will be well under construction. and just a little statement on that. we've already built a lot of the wall. we've been working very, very hard. we've renovated a tremendous amount of wall. i just told you, we did a lot of wall in san diego, where they wanted it very badly. so we haven't been sitting still for the first, believe it or not, less than two years. we've been working very, very hard. the wall is -- we've done a lot of miles of wall already. so we're not just starting off fresh. but we have large numbers of miles that we have to do. and we can't let gaps -- because if you have gaps, those people are going to turn their vehicles or the gangs of -- you think they're going to be coming in through those gaps, and we cannot let that happen. >> mr. president! >> kevin. >> mr. president -- >> thank you, sir. thank you, mr. president. appreciate that. a question about government employees. what is your personal message to those who are impacted by t

it is a three-year extension of daca. amnesty will be used only on a much bigger deal, whether on immigration or something else. likewise, there will be no push to remove the 11 million plus people who are here illegally, but be careful nancy. does that sound like he's moving a bit and what's your reaction to that? >> it doesn't sound like he's moving at all. if he wants to work on reform, open the government and sit down with democratic leaders to actually work on the stuff that needs to get done. people need a pathway to citizenship, and we have 3 million dreamers in this country and we should be protecting these young people. they came here through no fault of their own and they have made lives. some are serving in our u.s. military. why wouldn't you welcome them here to make sure they can have a pathway to citizenship? that's something we're willing to talk about. for the president to hold hostage public servants, it's wrong. it's morally wrong. >> the white house suggested yesterday that the president's plan is simil

tonight, i debate all of this with a daca dreamer who says stop it democrats, i am a daca treatment. give money to trump to buy the wall we need the wall. i will also ask about the angel moms, dads and loved ones that have lost family members to criminal illegals. this looks like it may be the longest shutdown in history but still on this saturday. both sides want to avoid it and more on your money. rising fears, brynn may crash out of the eu without a decent trade deal. that could hit the market here. theresa may in trouble. jeremy corbyn wants to delay brexit and provide time to challenge theresa may in a general election. conservatives going toward jeremy corbyn. now this. a new twist in the jeff bezos divorce saga. will try to get to the question, will his split with his wife forced him to split his amazon shares with his ex-wife as adultery charges loom we met we dig into what all of this means for amazon. trading lower today. thank you for joining us, "the evening edit" starts right now.♪ ♪ [music] liz: we are coming out of dc. it is looking more likely the president will make

border security, daca, t.p.s., and many other things. straightforward, fair, reasonable, and common sense, with lots of compromise. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell has pledged to bring this bill to a vote this week in the united states senate. our proposal is not intended to solve all of our immigration challenges. this plan solves the immediate crisis and it is a horrible crisis. like a humanitarian crisis we rarely see in our country. and it provides humanitarian relief. it delivers real border security. and it immediately reopens our federal government. if we are successful in this effort, then we can start the border project of remaking our immigration system for the 21st century. once the government is open and we have made a down payment on border security, and immigration reform starts to happen, i plan to convene weekly bipartisan meetings at the white house so we can do a finished product. a great product. a product that we can all be proud of having to do with that elusive immigration problem. whatever we do, i can probl

the 25 billion deal was there and would have relieved daca, what have put things in place to allow daca. what mr. kapur failed to mention, yes, he wanted the visa -- to cut back on the visa lottery, but chuck schumer and his lemmings also stuck into that bill, they wanted to add that in the chain migration portion of that bill, which was totally unacceptable and is unacceptable to me and many republicans and mr. trump. so as soon as chuck schumer decides he wants to play it straight, we might get a bill. in fact, i hope mr. trump reverts to that $25 billion. , if theo, caller president accepts less than $5 billion, what would be your reaction specifically? >> i wouldn't agree to it. i wouldn't agree to it until he accepts a deal for $25 billion. let the government holds. points on that. callers like that are who the president is talking to and why the shutdown occurred. is $25 billion for the wall over 10 years. the 5 billion for the dog -- wall is for one year. there is not really a contradiction there. to his point about chain migration in that february 2018 bill, there was nothing in

president trump says let's make a deal as his daca for a wall proposal gains steam on both sides of the aisle. it's he all eyes on the senate where a vote to reopen the government could come as early as tomorrow. heather: and apologies are rolling in after a high school student was slammed for a now viralen county. viral encounter. "fox & friends first" starts right now. ♪ heather: lots of people across the country not exacting kissing the skies this morning. they're dealing with a wintery blast. we have some really strong winds here in new york city good morning to everyone. a live shot of new york city for you there to start your day. you're watching "fox & friends first" on this martin luther king day. i'm heather childress. it's great to be back after a week off and we always appreciate you joining us. let's begin with this, though. things haven't changed in a week. democrats refusing to provide a counter offer to president trump's new proposal he made over the weekend to reopen the government. garrett tenney is live in washington with more on the administration's attempt to restart

one thing i have to say, daca. we are all for daca. the republicans are for doing something with daca. but it's been so misreported. we had a the confines of a deal. and the $25 billion didn't just cover a wall; it covered a lot of border security. and we have a lot that that's been covered very incorrectly. but it's confusing to a lot of people. but we were close to having a daca deal, and then we had a judge rule from the ninth circuit, amazing ruling, and he said daca was ok, even though when president obama signed it, he essentially said, well, probably can't sign this. probably not legal, but i'm going to sign it anyway. and so everybody thought that it was going to be easily overturned by the judge. and the judge amazingly ruled in favor of that signing, even though president obama didn't think it was going to hold up as he signed it. he said it. go back and check. and then you had it upheld in the ninth circuit, on appeal. and now it's going to the supreme court of the united states. we had a deal, pretty close to being done, an

border security, daca, tps and many other things. straightforward, fair, reasonable and common sense with lots of compromise. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell has pledged to bring this bill to a vote this week in the united states senate. our proposal is not intended to solve all of our immigration challenges. this plan solves the immediate crisis, and it is a horrible crisis. it is a humanitarian crisis like we rarely see in our country. and it provides humanitarian relief. delivers real border security. and immediately reopens our federal government. if we are successful in this effort. then we can start the border project of remaking our immigration system for the 21st century. once the government is open and we have made a downpayment on border security, and immigration reform starts to happen, i plan to convene weekly bipartisan meetings at the white house so we can do a finished product, a great product. a product that we can all be proud of. having to do with that illusive immigration problem. whatever we do, i can promi

amparados bajo "daca" y tps? desde los Ángeles juan carlos gonzÁlez tiene respuestas.uan carlos: una extensiÓn de tres aÑos para los beneficiarios de "daca", a cambio de que se aprueben los fondos para el muro fronterizo. >> es una propuesta que no es aceptable debido a que no es una soluciÓn permanente.

the tps population is similar to the daca population.en in the united states for 18, 19, 20 years u and they do did he ne deserve a permanent solution. hoping they will at least consider making a counterproposal, a counteroffer to the president, perhaps that would deliver permanent protections for daca recipients and the tps population. >> but you're already hearing from people like ann coulter and i'm sure we're going to hear from some conservative republicans saying this is amnesty, and there she is. trump appropriates amnesty. we voted for trump and got jeb. so where does that leave the republican side of this? >> without a question, those types of comments do have an influence on the president, regrettably, but the tonight went on the record saying that he did want to compromise, that he did want a deal. for weeks now, chris, many of us have known the obvious out, the obvious solution for the current drama and this shutdown crisis, which, by the way, the president should own because he said he would own back at that meeting in the wh

and it was on one topic, a topic they actually shut the government down over, daca. is it no longer important to the democrats? is it no longer important to open up the government? when they had an opportunity last week to actually pay the workers, the 800,000 workers and still negotiate, they said no. i think it's time speaker pelosi begins to listen to her own conference. let's solve this problem. there is a reasonable proposal on the table. unlike the democrats who have never offered any proposal to solve the solution. the president has just offered one which i think is common ground, exactly what the american public expects us to do. we can get this done this week. hopefully the senate will pass and we can take it up on the floor of the house. with that we'll open it up to questions. reporter: mr. leader, by canceling next week's g.o.p. -- mr. mccarthy: postponing it. reporter: does that suggest you don't think the government will be back open by next week? mr. mccarthy: looking at the actions of the speaker where she says no to proposal before the president even