arrests some of these guys and now dana white the guy from u.s.c. he's going out there and saying you know what i talked to the f.b.i. and i think we had a little little something to do with that so if you see like a big meat head look in flight or a guy who's got a bone to pick with hackers he just to be ready because he's trying to he's kind of up to no good if you ask me what do i know. about that go check or twitter all that crap well you are a producer so you know i would say you know a lot did i know a couple of andrea would thank you very much read all about what andrew has been working on our website r.t. dot com slash usa that was andrew blake with a preview i was trying to say under the. well it looks like congress will act to prevent interest rates from on student loans from doubling their such a go up in just a few days the rates were set to rise on july first from the current three point four percent rates all the way up to six point eight percent but college students and grad student breathe a sigh of relief just yet that's because eve

>> the notion that my white house would purposefully release classified national security information is offensive. it's wrong. >> eric: dana, you picked this out as he was saying it. "my white house." >> dana: it rubs people the wrong way. i know what he meant, my staff, i'd never allow my staff to have done that. it has gone too far. there are leaks on national security issue versus strategic plan to shape a story before the speech tomorrow. these are different. they are so concerned three months later and after a press conference from bipartisan members on capitol hill that's when they asked eric holder the point. >> bob: you're right. maybe the use of "my white house" was not right but my guess is every president used it. the idea it leaked out of the white house out of obama and that peter king his office contacted me, very nice. i still think you are close to treason by -- >> greg: i got to say, i'm offended. barack obama is offended. how dumb does he think we are? saying -- it's a deniable, it's a deflection. you can say that. if a leak from a specific person you think they leaked it. >> bob: you're suggesting that t

juan: last week, former attorney general was in washington for unveiling of the portrait, dana perino went to the whitehere we did an interview about latino and republicans. >> when i asked you about what governor romney do with reaching out to the community, you did not mention marco rubio. >> i don't think people are going to vote for governor romney based on who he chooses as his number two. i don't. i don't think it will make a difference to the hispanic community. >> juan: this is interesting coming from a fellow republican that rubio might not be the answer. by the way, awe a new poll out from nbc telemundo indicating that 60% of hispanics with obama. that is a slight decrease. the biggest upset latinos have with obama is gas prices. they think he is responsible for gas prices. >> greg: k.g., what do you got? >> kimberly: i have a nice story. >> greg: i'll be the judge of thatth >> kimberly: i'll decide. american heroism, local hero was honored. she spent more than 70 years of her 102-year-old life serving this country as a veteran. she witnessed world war i and started serving the country tartin

>> dana: as a matter of fact, bob, you came up quite a bit at the white house today. >> andrea: we hearlot of fans down there. >> dana: everybody from former secretary tom ridge said one of his favorite shows. carlos gutierrez, his wife was there and says she watches it every day. i got to see a lot of the butler staff and wait staff i got to know over the years who watch it every day. one guy, i will tell you who it is when i see you in person came up and said i have a bone to pick with you. this is a guy we worked with. he said you are way too soft on bob beckel. >> andrea: i want to play s.o.p. for you. things haven't always been that gracious between the two. take a listen. >> when i came in office, there had been drifts in the afghan strategy. they run up these wild debts. we take over and we have to clean it up. >> they want to give banks and insurance companies more power to do as they please. strip out regulation to protect consumers. that is not new. crime. remember? the last guy did all this. >> bob: on a day we have nice civility at the white house to start off to do these th

white house press corps. i like him and i think he is a good reporter but this raises a question in my mind, why in the world, danaed that the white house press association gives out passes. i would no more give a pass to daily caller as want to get a bad case of measures. they are a right wing group, they're not reporters. who is this jerk? >> eric: there are two issues. was the guy right in questioning the president? right in the meth of doing it? was domson right to bring in racecars? should they be allowed in the press conference? >> dana: sometimes a president takes question after a statement. sometimes they don't. you don't usually do it in the middle of somebody's statement. more like as ending. i understand the frustration you have a big announcement. why now? the timing was in question. they probably had a feeling that obama wasn't going to answer any questions. at least nobody threw a shoe at the president. got to remember that. >> greg: good point. i am so against this gazing. do you think the left sits around and goes i wonder if we were hard on president bush? nope. that never happens. >> dana: they s

white house seems to be under attack as well. is he managing the message at all? how do you interpret it? >> danae thing the white house hasn't had to do up until now is talk about it daily. justice department has been good at keeping the line drawn saying the white house wasn't involved. once they ask president obama to assert executive privilege which was not about the white house communications and presidential communications but just about something at the justice department, that is unusual and harder to prove. one thing that do now, you know this, they have to go through every single document and explain and justify for everybody else why the dock meants fall under the executive privilege. they are on shaky ground. they accused president bush of hiding behind executive privilege during the u.s. attorney issue a few years ago. but now they're hiding behind president bush. it's thin gruel. there is going to be a lot of talk about the politics of this. but because somebody died, agent brian terry that you mentioned, then this is different. my last point is one of the documents that they asked,

white house. if it looks bad -- >> bob: that is outrageous allegation. >> dana: i don't think so. david sanger -- >> bob: there are 10,000 people in the security -- >> dana: they have 100 people on the conference call on the kill list to decide who is going to vote. maybe that is a bad idea. 100 people. interestingly, i thought david sanger from the "new york times" has a book out this week and one thing he says is after the bin laden raid, secretary bob gates no longer secretary, at the time he went to the national security advisor who asked for his advice on communications. secretary gates said here is my best p.r. advice. shut the -- hmm -- up. >> greg: what did he say? >> dana: a bleeped word. a banned word. >> bob: i've said it before. i'll do it for you. >> dana: if you have the secretary of defense and he is worried about the national security problems from the leaks because they were using it to make president obama look better, then actually he didn't even need help. he looks good on. >> kimberly: he did. they overplayed their hand. he has to deny it and have plausible de

and the obama campaign scraping the bottom of the barrel. >> dana: bob, that was outside of any of the super-pac activity. do you think the whitet the campaign, they think they have a bigger problem than they thought they were going to have? >> bob: first, they can have all of my old wedding presents. >> dana: did you get a bread maker? >> bob: matching towels and some thing i don't -- >> dana: egg coddlers? >> bob: they are all in storage. if you want them, they're all yours. look, it's probably true that because obama has been spending what we call the burn rate in presidential politics at a furious rate on the field operations, joe said, but what karl -- karl may be right they will be v, the romney campaign will have more money. however, what karl failed to say is his own pac is going to spend $150 to $200 million against obama. already spent $50 million against him. when you add it up, obama will be outspent badly. >> dana: they have the opportunity to raise money from super pacs and then they have union support. >> andrea: they will have plenty of outside groups donating money. it's true, they have had trouble fundraising.

if you are white in america you have advantages. >> greg: if you are black in americas you also have advantages. >> kimberly: if you're an american you have advantages. >> danae advantages. all the advantages, right? >> kimberly: all the people have light eyes. >> greg: the advantage is you can become president of the united states. pretty cool. >> eric: you are hitting exactly the point, greg. it's all about fair shot, fair -- equal student to succeed. everyone doesn't have to have the same amount of success. they have to have the same opportunities to succeed. we have that. we have a black president. >> bob: do you think the black kid from bronx has same as white kid from we chester? >> eric: absolutely. absolutely the same opportunity. >> bob: that's ridiculous. >> eric: america is 72% white. for them not put in that ad we have the, that whites have a privilege of walking in a room and not looked at different, i don't get that. if i go to the corner of market and broad and newark, i get looked at differently. i guarantee you i get looked at -- >> bob: i look at you differently every day. >> greg: dana and kimberly walk in anywhere and they are looked at d

at the time, dana preeno, the white house spokeswoman said this, quote, the white house had tried to compromise with house democrats to help lawmakers obtain information from mr. bolten and ms. meier short of public testimony. many of the things we asked for we were willing to give, but instead they're going to waste time on this partisan, few tile act. is the contempt vote for mr. holder a partisan, futile act? >> not at all. if you go back earlier a year ago, look at the democrats who signed a letter asking the administration for the same information. i mean, every step of the way, we have sat. we will delay the contempt vote, not have it, just given the information. it's quite unusual and quite different that in the 11th hour they go to executive privilege. that -- that to me is a little disturbing. and the difference here is, an american died. doesn't the american public have a right to know? an american died by gun-running guns the american government knew. if you look just on the committee itself, we have former u.s. attorneys in there and others. i think this is a case that ha

does the white house or try to get the endorsement of sandra fluke? >> danathink really, right, some endorsements you don't want? >> eric: right. did they entertain the endorsement? >> bob: the 315 million people in this country spend less time thinking about this than we talk about it. it matters not a whip. >> dana: fun to talk about. >> bob: it is. >> greg: i like you didn't remember her. that's true. the way the news cycle is. >> bob: i sort of did. but like talking about the how the right is coalescing and how they've been -- >> dana: wait. we'll see. >> bob: go to the poll. >> kimberly: supreme court comes out with a decision. we'll see what happens. poll, 55% of americans believe that political positions will play a role in the healthcare decision. controversy continues. coming up, bad news for welfare recipients. new york may stop letting them use taxpayers dollars to buy food. smokes. and lotto tickets. say it isn't so. but are some people opposed to this idea? we hear from bob next. ♪ ♪ also, get a free flight. you know that comes with a private isl

>> dana: i can. >> eric: start with the white house and other countrys not wanting to work with us. >drea: he pulled a holder. not answering the question. >> dana: we are talking about the leaks serious enough on a bipartisan basis, the senators in charge of the oversight of the national security were concerned enough they had to bring it up. now they are held to secrecy. a witness today from the "new york times" who testified. the question was does the "new york times" leak? "we don't leak. we report." what is interesting about the drone issue. when a drone strike hit, there is evidence, you can see it. people die. governments get mad and complain to the united states. now we have a story about drones. a difference is aclu,nariry a peep from them. when the president of the united states, president bush, asked the "new york times" to appeal to the terrorism and please not report surveillance program, they said out of their sense of duty they had to go out there and put it out there. that changed the intelligence -- >> bob: you are right about that. when i was in the white house, they

. >> dana: or someone within the white house. this is program we learn from the "new york times" deliberate on individuals that will be killed on drone attacks around the world. a little micro manager. take him at his word and say he didn't know about it. the department of justice had been good until now about shielding the white house from this and keeping it apart. by asking president obama to assert executive privilege, there are a lot of different levels. a complicated law. what you're saying is within the deliberative discussion, there was some sort of letter or communication in between that time frame that might have said someone in the justice department knew or didn't know. there is something there. one reason this is hisser to rick, you usually can reach some accommodation. eric holder said he thought he had offered what he thought was reasonable. the committee rejected that. that is how they ended up with the vote today. >> eric: you said you think -- >> andrea: you said you think you can predict what the vote will be.

all of the people in the white house were discouraged and down. i invited danapend the night at the white house free. >> mr. rogers "it's a beautiful day in the neighborhood." then you add a littlejohn wayne. here we go let's go over you put them together you have george per be herbert walker bush. >> during his final days he worked diligently to recognize americans who he thought made a difference. >> we begin with a national strategy, changing attitudes so all americans define a successful life as one that includes serving others. >> yhe used that sentence more than any other sentence in his presidency because he felt it was important to keep people from thinking differently about what they thought and what they believed was success in their life. >> one thing there is for sure i didn't lack inspiration or support during those four years. as to whether we got some things right history can make that determination. >> up next, what does a former president do after life in the white house? here's a hint. doesn't sit in a rocking chair. [ male announcer ] if a pho

. >> greta: is the white house losing the p.r. war? dana perino is the co-host of fox news "the five." nice to see you. >> nice to see you, too. >> greta: all right. is it fair to say that the white house gets an "f" in p.r.? because this is exploding. >> one of the difficult things for the current white house is that fast & furious has been an issue that the justice department has dealt with almost solely, it wasn't something that bled into the daily white house briefing. so it was not something you were answering questions about every day. i don't know if president obama has ever gotten a question about it at a press conference. but now, having asserted executive privilege on behalf of the attorney general, now that comes to the white house. one of the things is, for somebody who has covered this more, like here at fox, then you know that actually, the operation they are talking about was different from the previous administration to this one, in that the previous administration worked in direct contact with mexican authorities. under fas

. >> greta: is the white house losing the p.r. war? dana perino is the co-host of fox news "the five." nice to see you. >> nice to see you, too. >> greta: all right. is it fair to say that the white house gets an "f" in p.r.? because this is exploding. >> one of the difficult things for the current white house is that fast & furious has been an issue that the justice department has dealt with almost solely, it wasn't something that bled into the daily white house briefing. so it was not something you were answering questions about every day. i don't know if president obama has ever gotten a question about it at a press conference. but now, having asserted executive privilege on behalf of the attorney general, now that comes to the white house. one of the things is, for somebody who has covered this more, like here at fox, then you know that actually, the operation they are talking about was different from the previous administration to this one, in that the previous administration worked in direct contact with mexican authorities. under fas