for more on this, brett's bring in david bruno -- let's bring in david bruno.> there's a federal law and regulation, that required the distributors to come up with a process to identify misuse. cheryl: bulk orders, for example. >> exactly. they should have had a process in place to identify that there were too much drugs coming into these two specific counties. that's important too. this is only two counties. cheryl: it's tough to prove but i'm not the attorney. >> it's sheer volume. it's the sheer volume of it. yeah, and the distributors, they're going to say we're the middleman. we didn't manufacture this. we didn't prescribe it. and the dea was involved as well. the doj, horowitz inspector general, he recently came out and pointed fingers at the dea to say that they didn't do enough, that they had quotas to actually -- cheryl: is it the government's responsibility, though, to police -- a doctor writes a patient a prescription, whether they think they need it or not. i'm assuming they would, right? personal choice. personal responsibility. >> sure. cheryl: i'

david bruno his life to break it down. >> a circus under attack. horrifying moments that left a crowd filled with kids in shock. if you have medicare, listen up. the medicare enrollment deadline is only weeks away. with so many changes, do you know if your plan is still the right fit? having the wrong plan may cost you thousands of dollars out of pocket. and that's why i love healthmarkets, your insurance marketplace. with their new fitscore, they compare thousands of plans from national insurance companies to find the right medicare plan that fits you. call or visit health markets to find your fitscore today. in minutes, you can find out if your current plan is the right fit or if there's another one that can get you extra coverage or help save you money. best of all, their service is completely free. does your plan have $0 copays, $0 deductibles, and $0 premiums? if not, maybe it's not the right fit. does it include dental and vision coverage? well, if not, maybe it's not the right fit. how about hearing aids, glasses, and gym memberships at no a

let's debate with legal eagles, alex sawyer, defense attorney david bruno. good to have you both.ibit a, sheriff gary long. >> illuminate any possibility any of these children become prey to a sexual predator. mike: is he wrong? >> unfortunately he is. i agree with his policy of protecting children but it has to be done right. i represent people charged with sex crimes and i find this would be a violation of due process because when defendants interpleads and agree to the registration they agreed to registration and certain other things. the statute is specific, you can't live next to daycare. you can't have some jobs. it goes into prohibiting certain conduct. it never talks about these signs so they are not on notice at the time they enter a deal they are convicted. that would be a violation of the due process clause. mike: your turn. >> other states have no candy laws that talk about signs and whether supreme court ruled is they can't apply retroactively. if somebody -- the law was passed in 2008 it didn't apply to them but it could move forward. this case is interesting because

here to debate, david bruno. thank you for joining us, we appreciate it. let's begin. the differences between these cases and is this criminal? >> based on the press conference we don't know. this is a long way from being litigated and who knows if this one will come back from south korea. based on the press conference if she accepts the da's word it looks to be on its face a stronger case than the michelle carter case because unlike michelle carter she was physically present at the time this young man jumped off the roof a parking garage. first these messages if you look at what is in massachusetts law assuming the case doesn't get reversed by the supreme court, the michelle carter case, this could be and probably is a stronger case. heather: you were saying a key difference between the two cases as well. >> yes, this defendant was on scene. the prosecutor said she stocked him and went to the scene but yesterday a boston press release said the defendant in a statement said she was trying to stop him. it is an interesting development if true. it could go to the heart o

david bruno, your reaction? >> i think if you hear the left today, i think they are trying to distract from the impeachment proceeding. i know that u.s. attorney durham was starting the investigation before we even talked about impeachment and the ukraine issue so i think that's unfair criticism. i think it's huge news and i think it has gone from an administrative review to criminal. i agree. we can't jump to too many conclusions but the in paneling of this grand jury like rush limbaugh said is important. they can call witnesses into the grand jury under oath and really sequester testimony and look at the ruling today. the grand jury testimony is so secretive that they can operate this investigation and the close quarters wow corners of the grand jury and i think it's an important development. >> roxio says now it has the authority to subpoena witness testimony, documents, impanel grand jury and file criminal charges. robert, where is this heading? >> i think where this is headi heading, we are waiting for the