david pillpel. 5 upon points. following up on a comment that i made at the last meeting i understand and see from the calendared item list is new puc letterhead. next, i enjoyed the revenue bond committee tour of the ocean side treatment plant last friday morning and i have not been there in awhile. new building with recycled water facility. i did not visit but will in the future. tour was great. next, i was not able to give public comment at the end of the last meeting on items 16, 17 and 18 but would not have changed the outcome and its fine. next i note the apparent water main break yesterday at union and fillmore. the quick repair work by proved despite the difficult work environment and the weather. and i note the over night and expected upon rainfall which is good on the water side and the affect on wastewater plants and process as well. ch that's all i very much vehicle. thank you. next caller, you have 2 minutes. >>ed upon commissioners i would like to talk about huge development by lake merced and other h

david pillpel again. on this item, in yes victor did upload the department's submission this morning. that is great, but also in attachment 21 the committee packet should have today date and has last week. it is better for the police to have some of this equipment and not use it then to not have it and need it in the event of some event that requires it. that's where i fall on the acquisition or holding the equipment. my understanding is that this doesn't change what the police has, it just makes the list of that equipment publicly transparent and extent govern its use in a way that did not exist before, so it is really more about transparency then additional pension militarization of the police. i hope the sheriff department policy pending before this committee and any other ab481 policy gets similar scrutiny to the police department's. thanks for listening. >> thank you. can we have our next caller? >> hi. this is jennifer (inaudible) work for the american friend service committee. calling to urge this

. >> david pillpel again inch don't want to get in the way of getting the work done. supportive. but i had a couple questions similar to commissioner paulson. does this item which appears to be a staff augmentation does this need approval from civil service commission or prop j approval from the board of supervisors? this men a new approach or new precedent. i heard the response about the staff of this contractor being represented by local 1245. but 1245 represents private sector and pg sxeshgs electrical workers. and iv w local 6 represents public sector including puc line workers and other electrical workers. has there been out reach with local 6 about this contract or this approach to augmenting staffing given the current labor environment. it is different and raising questions. a baptist discussion. thank you for your comments. there are no more callers in the queue. >> public comment is closed. >> is there clarification? on this item? i thought -- private sector. >> you have a question i will answer you, commissioner. >> this sell a proof sector >> they need to have a differ

david pillpel, good morning. happy to speak in support of michael lambert to the children families first commission. director lambert is a excellent city librarian professional and caring and think he will serve well in this capacity. one of my not sure how to say this-one of my favorite department heads. there are many, but he is one of my favorites. i'm sure you will have to tweak page 1 line 17 to page 2 line 6 to remove the reference to the residency waver, but i would urge you to support and approve the mayor's nomination of michael lambert to the children and families first commission. thanks for listening. >> are there any additional speakers on item number 2 mr. young? >> there are no additional public commenters for this matter. >> alright. public comment is closed. mr. young-this might take care of my technical problem indicated at the beginning of this item that a residency waver was not required, is that correct? >> yes, can amend it to remove any-remove reference to residency waver. i thought mr. lam

david pillpel. 5 upon points.mment that i made at the last meeting i understand and see from the calendared item list is new puc letterhead. next, i enjoyed the revenue bond committee tour of the ocean side treatment plant last friday morning and i have not been there in awhile. new building with recycled water facility. i did not visit but will in the future. tour was great. next, i was not able to give public comment at the end of the last meeting on items 16, 17 and 18 but would not have changed the outcome and its fine. next i note the apparent water main break yesterday at union and fillmore. the quick repair work by proved despite the difficult work environment and the weather. and i note the over night and expected upon rainfall which is good on the water side and the affect on wastewater plants and process as well. ch that's all i very much vehicle. thank you. next caller, you have 2 minutes. >>ed upon commissioners i would like to talk about huge development by lake merced and other huge developments in t

david pillpel, good morning. happy to speak in support of michael lambert to the children families first commission. director lambert is a excellent city librarian professional and caring and think he will serve well in this capacity. one of my not sure how to say this-one of my favorite department heads. there are many, but he is one of my favorites. i'm sure you will have to tweak page 1 line 17 to page 2 line 6 to remove the reference to the residency waver, but i would urge you to support and approve the mayor's nomination of michael lambert to the children and families first commission. thanks for listening. >> are there any additional speakers on item number 2 mr. young? >> there are no additional public commenters for this matter. >> alright. public comment is closed. mr. young-this might take care of my technical problem indicated at the beginning of this item that a residency waver was not required, is that correct? >> yes, can amend it to remove any-remove reference to residency waver. i thought mr. lam

david pillpel. several items for general public comment. first it is important to start the meeting early on web ex it takes time to log in. i'm just now getting into it on web and he cans not able to call in before because it was not set up. the web page for the meeting don't track with the agenda itself. that's a little confusing. that, too got updated. wait a minute. hold on. wrong page. one second. yea. the web page november 21-22, sanitation and streets commission. it says for example, item 5 destruction to bruro forestry and bureau of forestry performance. 7, street and environmental services work. it is just important for though the agenda item descriptions in my vow to lineup exactly to the agenda its. um -- next. i asked before for an upon presentation on dpw director orders and that process how it relates to the 2 commissions now. i ask either part of that presentation or separate to hear about the administrative hearings process. and how that works worked until now and if there are changes to hearings under the public work's code