david pilpel. can you hear mow? >> yes. >> excellent. my only comment on item one commission secretary's report the advanced calendar is missing from today's materials. i'm hoping this in the future we'll have the advanced calendar with the regular meetings or rescheduled regular meetings, important to track where things are. thank you very much. thank you. >> thank you, caller. that appear to be our last caller for public comment. >> thank you. we will move on to item 2. secretary fuller, call that item >> item 2 is general public upon comment of and members of public may address the commission on topics went subject matter of the commission but not part of this agenda. comments specific to an agenda item may be heard had this item is considered. members of public may address the commission for 3 minutes and general public comment may be continued to the end if speakers exceed 15 minutes. members of public who wish it make 3 minutes of general public comment may lineup against the wall. if calling

. >> david pilpel 2 comments on item 3. not clear to me why this would be a committee report the next meeting of the bridge district board is not until end of february i did not seat urgency for this to go as a committee report for tomorrow and in the sure if supervisor chan can participate in item 7. other then and there that i have no objection to the proposed appointments and -- possible low reappointments. thanks. >> public comment is closed. why i did not originally call it we will not vote on it where supervisor chan present. with that i will make a couple of housekeeping amendments. on item 3 -- we need to conform the in title with language within the motion. and so i will move to amend as line 9. the date 2023 to 2025. on that motion a roll call, please? >> yes. on that motion. supervisor chan? >> aye. >> vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> chair peskin. >> aye. >> the motion passes without objection. >> and then item 5. i will make a motion to remove the word in the long title at line 3 as an alternate. replace with t

david pilpel again. so one thing i noticed in the minutes and because i had to pdf the minutes, i can't give the page reference. this is on the january 13th minutes item 7. just before public comment. refers to commissioner romano as commission romano. changing that word prosecute commission to commissioner. and then in general, on the minutes i have in the looked at them, it is in my experience unusual to not a problem to make a first reference to someone with their full name but subsequent references to just someone by their last name without a title or full name or reference to genteder is odd. so by way of example on that same page wong made an introduction statement to the commission it strikes me as unusual the way the city does minutes at various bodies. i don't think there is nothing illegal or wrong i ask you staff tong about how to characterize subscent references to an individual. i'm noticing under public comment related item 8 the closed session. gary webeck the attorney is spelled winuc. if

david pilpel, good morning. so i attend most meetings of the bridge district. supervisor stefani has been a good member of the bridge board i support her reappointment. i think it is good to reappointment members who are familiar with busied. i think tell be grit to have all of the san francisco seats on the bridge board filled. i think it is best to have the members be fully engaged and represent the city on the bridge board. and just finally, i would encourage supervisor peskin to look at both items 2 and 3 online 12. i would suggest that they can be core litted item 3 has either an extra word or couple words missing and item 2 could insert to the district secretary of the -- prior to the bridge district reference online 12 this is the optional. either way i support the reappointment of supervisor stefani. thank you for listening. >> okay. that was our last public commenter on the phone line. >> public comment on item 2 is closed. i like to make a motion to send to the full board with period recommendations. >> yes. okay. on that motion, supervisor peskin. >>

. >> david pilpel 2 comments on item 3. not clear to me why this would be a committee report the next meeting of the bridge district board is not until end of february i did not seat urgency for this to go as a committee report for tomorrow and in the sure if supervisor chan can participate in item 7. other then and there that i have no objection to the proposed appointments and -- possible low reappointments. thanks. >> public comment is closed. why i did not originally call it we will not vote on it where supervisor chan present. with that i will make a couple of housekeeping amendments. on item 3 -- we need to conform the in title with language within the motion. and so i will move to amend as line 9. the date 2023 to 2025. on that motion a roll call, please? >> yes. on that motion. supervisor chan? >> aye. >> vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> chair peskin. >> aye. >> the motion passes without objection. >> and then item 5. i will make a motion to remove the word in the long title at line 3 as an alternate. replace with t

. >> david pilpel 2 comments on item 3. not clear to me why this would be a committee report the next meeting of the bridge district board is not until end of february i did not seat urgency for this to go as a committee report for tomorrow and in the sure if supervisor chan can participate in item 7. other then and there that i have no objection to the proposed appointments and -- possible low reappointments. thanks. >> public comment is closed. why i did not originally call it we will not vote on it where supervisor chan present. with that i will make a couple of housekeeping amendments. on item 3 -- we need to conform the in title with language within the motion. and so i will move to amend as line 9. the date 2023 to 2025. on that motion a roll call, please? >> yes. on that motion. supervisor chan? >> aye. >> vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> chair peskin. >> aye. >> the motion passes without objection. >> and then item 5. i will make a motion to remove the word in the long title at line 3 as an alternate. replace with t

>> good morning, david pilpel. i spoke on this 3 weeks ago the last time it was at this committee. to sum rise an update my comments i think there are existing way in law, policy and practice to limit public comment had necessary. i think that this motion is unnecessary at this time. i machine torthe situation and revisit it as needed. not heard enough about the resources needed to continue conducting hybrid meetings at the board of supervisors. i understood well was a presentation if the city add administrator's office it is posted on the wieks we have not seen that presentation before the committee yet. and in any event i would continue this item to the call of the chair here in committee. i would not forward this to the full board with or without recommendation. and i'm available to discuss this issue at any time. thank you very much for listening. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> yes, hello this is pete warfields head library user's association. library users to have [inaudible] and po box 1 upon 705. san francisco, california. >> i agree very much with every prior speake