we don't know whether she delete deleted them or whether they're there and she's not going to turn them over. assuming she deleted them and deleted them several years ago, those could have been overwritten and may or may not be able to be retrieved depending on how much time and energy and access you have. >> let me get margaret hoover's reaction. how did she do? >> look i'm really sympathetic to the argument that this was for convenience. i just didn't want to carry three devices around. it's really difficult. i just kept it all in one. maybe it was a bad decision. truly, i actually am sympathetic to that. but the fundamental question and what she said about government employees, every single government employee has to decide what is state business and what is personal and private. that is fundamentally not true, wolf. i've been a government employee for the federal government. many of us who are commentators at cnn have. when we're a federal government employee we're forced to use a dot-gov e-mail account so that all of those records are in the hands of the federal government and they

were any work items deleted in the course of producing the printed copies? answer, no. >> well, how do we know she didn't delete documents before she was in the course of producing the printed copies? >> that's right. that's the question. >> why did she only produce printed copies? because the digital copies are the government's records. she has a legal obligation to keep those records in the possession of the government. so that the government can use all the things that we do on e-mail today to find certain key words and phrases. that she has now disabled. >> if you're on your work computer and you delete e-mails, your employer can still search for those. nothing's really deleted. if a litigation comes up and so on certain searches can be done. in june of 2011 she said she complied with all the rules. in june of 2011, she sent out a reminder to all of her department personnel with her electronic signature that said, avoid conducting official department business from your personal e-mail accounts. she made clear personal accounts should never be used for go

after all by doing it the way she did it she could delete e-mails without anybody knowing she deleted them. >> well, the law is that you preserve the e-mails and no one has alleged that any of them were deleted. the fact that she had so many of them. the fact sha she turned them over before all this came public i think in october the state department asked all secretaries of state to send their e-mails over and she's the only one who

you pick words that -- i delete e-mails all the time.ot sure how you know it's thousands or whatever. what we do know is that she has turned over on the order of 12,000 e-mails for every week she was secretary of state. that is a lot of e-mails. i think she has stepped up and did what americans would want her to do. mark: she said today that she would not allow an independent party to review the server to see if it is handled correctly. clearly, republicans will weigh in on that. i expect some liberals will stay on that. do you think it is politically tenable for hillary will be i'm -- for hillary to be i'm yielding -- unyielding on that point? geoff: i do, so long as there is a government -- a level playing field. governor bush said he was not going to release his personal e-mails about golf dates and things of that sort. who is to decide which ones he will release and won't? as long as you ask the same thing of jeb bush and scott walker, who had a genuine scandal around this, as you do of hillary clinton, that will be fine. but my gues

>> why delete the personal e-mails? >> i would be happy to have someone talk to you about the rules. i fully complied with every rule. >> were you breached on the security implications of using your own e-mail server or using your own personal e-mail address with the president? >> i did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. there is no classified pearl. so i am certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material material. >> [ inaudible question ]. >> because they were personal and private about matters that i believed were within the scope of my personal privacy and that particularly of other people. they had nothing to do with work. but i didn't see any reason to keep them. >> when did you delete them? >> at the end of the process. >> [ inaudible ] who was forced to offered to two years ago because of his personal e-mails. [ inaudible ] from al jazeera. >> david i think you should go online and read the entire i.g. report. that is not an accurate representa

after all by doing it the way she did it she could delete e-mails without anybody knowing she deleted them. >> well, the law is that you preserve the e-mails and no one has alleged that any of them were deleted. the fact that she had so many of them. the fact sha she turned them over before all this came public i think in october the state department asked all secretaries of state to send their e-mails over and she's the only one who has done it. >> schieffer: doesn't this sort of reinforce what some of the critics have said about the clinton family over the years that they will cut a corner when they can and we have this now we have disclosures about foreign governments giving to the clinton foundation. just seems to raise a whole lot of issues that people used to have and it looks like they're back in the news. >> well, look, i mean, bottom line she's a national figure, potential presidential candidate. people are going to shoot at her. i know her. we were the two senators for new york for eight years she's is one of the most finest, most upstanding, most hone rabble people. always

why did she delete them and when did she delete them. regarding the democrats saying this is partisan. national review criticized him for not going harder and why didn't he break the story if he knew about the e-mails. he is getting hit from the left and right and that is usually a sign you are in the middle. >> there is a notion by some we are not supposed to question her. she believes she is allowed to do whatever she wants and that will not fly. left or right you are accountable to us. hillary you are accountable to us. you have to answer these questions and if not you will be viewed looking transparency. >> and mareen doubt who is not a conservative wrote a scathing article about that. that the clintons operate above the law and are not to be questioned >> she said she would make an announcement about her candidate running in april. we have now perforated into her new zone. >> hopefully she doesn't announce over e-mail. >> we will never see it. >> the white house firing back at republican senators who wrote a letter to iran's leaders

every line she threw out there, oh yoga, that is why i deleted, half of my emails. how could she not compartmentalize? everyone who has work email has private email. how could you not have both? >> that's right. julie, i have the business phone and i've got the pleasure phone right? >> pleasure phone? >> get carried away. not that much pleasure. >> personal phone? >> this is business and pleasure. >> i made it. >> she says she didn't want to have two of these, because didn't want to combine them on same email. maybe i get that. you don't want private email downloaded to the work server. that is what i do it. julie -- >> what is on pleasure phone. >> outnumbered overtime. i can be bribed with ice cream. julie doesn't make any sense. get her some ginko, dr. manny she had mitted on record she will twotwo phones. >> i will not defend it. hillary clinton cleared the democratic primary field. if you're a democrat, which i am you want to see democratic policies remain in the white house whoever that person is because i think they're better than alternative. however when sh

i delete pretty much everything.'m not a former secretary of state but, no, i don't have a problem with that, especially when computer experts have been on my show explain the way blackberries work versus droids and iphones. blackberry has very high security server. blackberry does, does not distinguish between one or another emails so would tick back. common for somebody to have one email address instead of two. and i don't think, i don't think everybody in office, even at level of secretary of state is somebody that would work for google. i understand wanting to have it easier, to have one device and have one email address. i'm pretty simplistic in that way. >> radio talk show host. difficult standard. >> this could all be avoided this could all be avoided if a subpoena issued and if all those emails that are claimed to be personal are read, then we could find out if there is any there there, and i don't think there will be. jon: she hasn't indicated she does not want to allow anybody to examine the server that sit

it will decide deletions on a case-by-case basis. entire search results will be removed if they are judged as risk to life and safety. yahoo says it will delete information on people under 20 on bullying cases and some records of crimes such as outdated entries on minor offenses. but the company promises to be less accommodating if the requests come from people in public positions, corporate leaders or celebrities. it says such information is generally considered highly public. the new standards will be implemented from tuesday. >>> executives at honda motor have unveiled their first convertible mini car in 19 years. the s-660 is a two seater equipped with a six speed manual transmission. the first ever in a mini vehicle. drivers can also enjoy a powerful cruise because of the turbo charged engine. the s-660 will go on the market starting thursday, selling for between $16,000 and $18,000. 26-year-old ryo mukumoto headed the engineering team that produced the convertible. >> we put a lot of fashion into building this sports-type model

another 32,000 that she deleted -- decided personal.a letter to iran warning leaders that any deal they make with president obama could be overturned when he leaves office. also in the bloomberg terminal, they are resisting calls to arm the ukraine. the president wants to see if a cease-fire will actually hold this time. the violence in eastern ukraine has killed more than 6000 people. lawmakers are voted to execute contex in that matter only -- convicts in that manner only if lethal drugs are not available. some democrats are horrible. >> i think it would be bad if utah is the only state that is actively shooting people. i think it is about resident and a place we should not go. olivia: that is a headline i did not see coming. utah's governor is not saying whether he will sign it into law. the number of american children warned to unmarried parents is up sharply. government figures show that cohabitating couples show a quarter of u.s. births. births to single mothers have declined in the last five years. those are your top headlines. t

trust me i deleted the right ones. i turned over everything. and you're going to see -- >> our system of oversight doesn't work that way. >> i know. >> but here's the calculation baier. she believes that her supporters will vote for her no matter what. this doesn't matter. let the right wing kooks pound her into voting, i'm not going to give anything more and i think that's what she believes. >> i think you're right. and i think politically there's some damage here that has been caused by how they handled this, by the fact this was a rushed press conference at the u.n., minus the fact all her talking about womens issues was totally erased this past week. politically there's a lot of damage here. one more thing about this bill, she said that there were personal e-mails between herself and the former president. well, "the wall street journal" came out today with something from the former president's office that says he has written two e-mails in his entire life. two e-mails. he doesn't use e-mail. he uses twitter. so the timing of that release an

she never answered how did you determine which ones you're going to delete and not delete? why did you delete them? are they still available on the server? can an independent arbiter go in and find them? what about the gaps that trey gowdy is talking about? >> exactly. this was deja vu all over again. i had this horrible feeling in the pit of my stomach, we've been here before and oh, my god, here with ego again. not only did she not answer, she raised a lot more questions. as you and doug just talked about. it's not a molehill it's a big hill. the mountain behind it are all the contributions from foreign governments and corporations, 26 of whom tried to get work from the state department, by the way. but look at this thing. it's unbelievable. do you remember when richard nixon -- i know we have no sense of history here. but during watergate, president nixon did transcripts of his quote, case, because he didn't want to turn them over. and he produced those and let those out. it did not suffice. because they chose the tapes. and guess what we found out. they missed some, so

and i know she must have a sore thumb that delete button.t's a lot to delete. 30,000. >> all right mayor thanks for coming in as always. when we come right back it will be miller time. he wants to talk about hillary and the new apple watch. miller is next. i have the worst cold with this runny nose. i better take something. dayquill cold and flu doesn't treat your runny nose. seriously? alka-seltzer plus cold and cough fights your worst cold symptoms plus your runny nose. oh, what a relief it is. in new york state, we're reinventing how we do business so businesses can reinvent the world. from pharmaceuticals to 3d prototyping, biotech to clean energy. whether your business is moving, expanding or just getting started... only new york offers you zero taxes for 10 years with startup ny business incubators that partner companies with universities, and venture capital funding for high growth industries. see how new york can grow your business and create jobs. visit ny.gov/business (mom) when our little girl was born we got a subaru. it's where

and i know she must have a sore thumb that delete button.a lot to delete. 30,000. >> all right mayor thanks for coming in as always. when we come right back it will be miller time. he wants to talk about hillary and the new apple watch. miller is next. my name is daniel i have diabetic nerve pain. the pain felt like my feet were on fire. i had these very burning ... needle-like sensations. i knew i needed to see a doctor. my doctor said "let's try lyrica." lyrica has helped relieve my pain. it's known that... diabetes damages nerves. lyrica is fda-approved to treat diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is not for everyone. it may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. or swelling, trouble breathing rash, hives, blisters, changes in eyesight including blurry vision, muscle pain with fever tired feeling, or skin sores from diabetes. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands,

if she has deleted emails can those deleted emails be recovered so investigators can really determinehether or not they're relevant? >> they can. i used to teach the computer crime investigation how to collect and image the drives and on the server, there should be a backup. it could be what they call an array of discs where you would kaet fail over scenarios. someone should go in there and image all the drives. if it's deleted there's a chance it's not overwritten. if it has been overwritten, then you have an intent to really get rid of these things. you have to start looking for backups but there is a way to go in and collect this stuff forensically so it can be introduced later. the supreme court all the time appoints somebody to look at it and derp what is relevant or not but from a technical standpoint, you can get the deleted emails. jenna: because we don't know what they say and because this is a controversy, we don't know what's actually inside the emails but if mrs. clinton calls you up over the last week, because the story continues and continues there's been some lead time

. >> deleter of the free world. "the washington post" also has hillary on the front page talking about the press conference yesterday. "the new york times" also has her on the front page. i think i saw the -- >> every single page. >> every single one. "wall street journal" has her on the front page. >> a lot of good coverage. >> the "usa today" has her on the front page. >> she's getting her name out there. >> not the "new york daily news". >> and of course the "daily news" -- >> that's interesting. >> hillary clinton is facing questions this morning, even more questions after breaking her silence about her use of a private e-mail account while serving as secretary of state. the united nations served as the backdrop for tuesday -- on tuesday for clinton's attempt to end the controversy ahead of a likely bid for the white house in 2016. as for the main question as to why she only used a personal e-mail she says it was simply because that was the easiest option available. >> when i got to work as secretary of state i

the other question that raises is if you deleted those, did you delete others? we all know permanent deletion is not easy for a civilian to do. it's possible who were -- who was running her i.t. operation permanently delete it does. that goes to the question that will be the biggest one coming out of this event. she is asking her opponents to say i handed it everything over that needed to be. she said she erred on the side of caution, but do they trust her to say that i deleted some e-mails from my personal server but those were only personal e-mails. hard to imagine why she would've deleted personal e-mails, but she did not explain. the knowledge -- the notion that she deleted some e-mails will raise some suspicion in some people. if you were deleting e-mails, how do you know that you did not delete something that you should not have? john: i have another technological question and we heard this yesterday from lanny davis. she repeated this line that she had done this for convenience to keep just one device. i don't know about you. you are fairly technologicall

, deleted, deleted. there's no reason to think that they were either. >> could a forensic expert get it retrieve it or dig it up somehow out of the machine on the computer? >> if you control the server you can pretty much delete things if you want. it may still be some trace and maybe the nsa can get to it but for all practical terms, you can control what is saved on the server. if there's something you want to get rid of, you probably can get rid of it. you probably have to destroy machinery to do it but it's out of the chain of custody is tainted here. that's the real issue. >> okay. >> so the people who don't like her, don't trust her, will always be able to say that we don't know for sure that she handed everything over. >> but she gave 55,000 documents from that personal server. so i mean she still might have more than 55,000 -- >> that doesn't say it all. that tells you a lot. >> that tells you a lot. >> that's what you normally do when you don't want to give all the information, you say how much y

was why did she delete personal e-mails. she said there were 60,000 e-mails in total, half were work half were personal. and after she went through a process of reviewing all of them and determining which should be turned over to the state department, she decided not to save the 30,000. so the question is why. i mean all of us have tons of personal e-mails, the inbox is full, but we save and archive them. these days it is hard to delete anything forever, they probably exist somewhere on her server. that's kind of the front line with republicans wanting to get their hands on that server get it to a third party to go through and verify that. otherwise, she's asking us to just trust her that she turned over all the work related e-mails. >> talk about the private server. tray gowdy on morning joe today explaining why he thinks clinton needs to turn over that server. take a listen. >> she doesn't get to determine what's a public record and what's a personal record. someone else needs to do that. i don't know why she doesn't just

if she is willfully deleting -- although she will argue that they're personal, but if she's deleting anything after the justice department congress, trey gowdy select committee asks for it she's in dangerous waters right there. >> do you really believe that? because the server's gone. you know it's gone. and i know it's gone. >> what do i know? i'm guessing -- >> that server is dead and buried. >> maybe it's like the rose law firm records that were lost and magically come back two years later in the closet. >> doesn't matter. just happened to show up. you think a crime was committed, don't you? you suspect. >> my instincts are there. but i always have to put my facts behind my opinion. >> how do you go about investigating something like this? in other words, if the server's gone like we had believed. >> very easy. if the server is gone she is communicating with uma abadin. >> who is using the same server. >> exactly. but she's communicating with sheryl mills. what i want to know is who were they communicating with. as we spread this out we might get access to some e-mails based upon

who deletes their private e-mails.know our company does that and so some folks say this is why hillary clinton should have a full-blown campaign asap because she would have the campaign and spokesperson and the full complement of folks and sending out what the media should have to cover. but if she was all the way in she would be getting asked over and over the questions, who knows when the fourth fifth, sixth time in iowa she gets asked the question and rolls her eyes and now she is upset and now the campaign has changed their tact. so what is better for her to be in right now or out right now? >> there is a lot of in between a full-blown campaign presence and the waldorf we're seeing. she has high name recognition. she doesn't need to introduce herself to new hampshire like scott walker does. but we're seeing rumblings inside of the white house, why did she take so long to get out ahead of this and she was warned about this for months and why did she choose not to react and it is feeding this perception that she is p

deleted personal e-mails. >> who decided what's private? >> that's the key. >> do you think she would be stupid enough to delete them on her device but not on the server? >> i don't think she's stupid to do that. that's my point. it's too easy to prove. i think we have to change the policy -- >> is there any way to recover -- >> you can send a subpoena for anything. you don't really need a grand jury -- >> she might have destroyed it yes. the issue is can you trust this woman based on her history? >> you can't prove that the destruction of those servers -- >> legal liability. >> i'm not suggesting -- criminal liability exactly. >> what did she have to hide all those years? >> obviously something. >> why did she do it? >> there was an 18-minute gap in watergate. there's a lot of gaps -- >> we've got lots of gaps no e-mails during months of benghazi, really? >> but nobody yet has been able to show any of those e-mails resided on a private server that they were -- >> we can't possibly know. >> understood. that's why they need to change the pol

>> there's an old rule that says delete doesn't and restore won't.u delete a file the odds are it's probably still there unless you do it properly. you can wipe files and actually make sure they're not retrieved over a long period of time. that's one of the problems is this idea of confidence. when she says these are all the e-mails, having confidence they actually are. >> hillary clinton is now leaving that event. you see ban ki-moon, the u.n. secretary general, escorting her. she's going to be supposedly walking over to that microphone momentarily to make a statement and answer reporters' questions on this e-mail controversy. she's been under enormous pressure to do so. >> mark just a quick question. when we hear the secretary of state hillary clinton has handed over 55,000 pages of e-mails to the u.s. state department that's a little bit misleading right, because it's not 55,000 pages. a lot of them are just the same e-mail over and over again, very long e-mail chains. it's as if you go back and forth with somebody for 20 e-mails, that's going to

e-mails that were personal in nature, that you didn't also delete e-mails that were professional but possibly unflattering, and what do you think of a third independent party come in to examine foes e-mails. >> you would have to ask that of every federal employee. the way the system works every individual, whether they have one device, two devices three devices how many addresses they make the decision. if you have a work-related device you choose what goes on that. that's how our system works. we trust and count on the judgment of thousands, maybe millions of people to make those decisions. and i feel that i did that, and even more, that i went above and beyond what i was requested to do and again those will be out in the public domain, and people will be able to judge for themselves. >> madam--madam secretary madam secretary, excuse me, madam secretary, state department rules the time you were state secretary were perfectly clear if a state employee were going to be using private e-mails that employee needed to turn those e-mails over to public computers. why did you not go along u

why did she delete them? >> nobody deletes personal e-mails.ou don't delete personal conversations. >> even if you do delete them, they stay on the server. if you want to go after her, subpoena the servers. you can't foya personal stuff, so you want to do it, you have to bring a lawsuit directly against her. >> i just keep saying, what is the law she broke? dana says, well, it was unethical and it looks shady. oh yeah, it looked kind of weird. and i say yeah, i think she's acting like a princess and entitled. but did she break the law? >> you should watch "the kelly file" tonight because shannon kaufman is going to be on talking about another law she may have broken, there's a form you have to sign that says i turned over everything when you leave government. she didn't do that. >> bill turned over everything. >>> all right, we've got to go. we have to think about the children. what about the children that have been let down by hillary? >>> coming up, if hillary's chances at the white house are ruined, which democrat will take her place? next.

a lot of explaining yet to do and i want to see what was deleted.s got to be very fascinating. >> it is always nice to have agreement. leslie and mark, take care. >>> time for my take now we don't have enough time on this show to the go through all of the unanswered questions from mrs. clinton's press conference. the biggest one for me is this, are we supposed to believe that hillary clinton never discussed state biz with anyone at dot-gov e-mails. so so they were saved in the government's archives. but to me, this is the essence of why she may have set up the private server and only used private e-mail. did she have her closest advisors also using private e-mail accounts? in that way, those the e-mails would never be deemed government business, but plenty of business may have been being discussed. they would simply be seen as private e-mails between hillary and her closest advisors. no dot-gov anywhere. which all leads to the biggest question of all, how will we ever know? >>> now to another big issue, there's still the cost of tracking her e-mail

from her attorney secretary clinton unilaterally decided to wipe her server clean and permanently delete all e-mails from her personal server." gowdy had demanded the e-mails from clinton as a part of his investigation and admonished the former secretary of state on "meet the press" last sunday. >> we don't get to grade our own papers in life. and she had a very unique arrangement with herself as it relates to public records. >> reporter: clinton has already turned over 55,000 pages of e-mails at the request of the state department, which wanted to update its records. gowdy noted clinton purged her personal server after the request was made. friday a spokesperson for clinton said turning over those e-mails is in keeping with the letter of the law. writing in a statement, secretary clinton has already turned all of her work e-mails over to the state department. clinton's use of a private e-mail account has complicated the rollout of her expected 2016 presidential run. earlier this week clinton tried to downplay the controversy. >> no more secrecy. no more zone of privacy. after all, what

almost as much as helleri excuses has to how and why should deleted half a per e-mail. she says they're all personal but how did she come up with secretary of? who knows? there probably gave it to lewis lerner. and questionable judgment may taint the presidency. into a picture of days to take about what they could do with the hubris as they continue to go unchecked. with that it respecter and to argue with the lefty the michelle obama campaign i am kennedy. kennedy: 47 republicans senators and the open letter to the every and leadership critical of negotiations obama is undertaking to stall the program. summer a agree as they tried to undermine policy with the act of surrender their fundamentally flawed. what does the unprecedented victory looks like with iran? >> to overthrow the regime was one that is a democratically elected. >> that works well in iraq can remove that model over? because we walked away to allow the ayatollah to influence the government to was a failed policy not because of the decision to overthrow saddam hussein but of what follows. kennedy: when yo

if not they deleted it. in to which response everyone says what? that's not okay. you can't have a mass deletion because they didn't have your key words. >> the story today is that her legal team read every word of every one of the 32,000 e-mails that she decided to delete. that's not possible. but even if it were it's for the government to read. >> right. >> not for her own agents and lawyers loyal to her. >> that's the point. don't get too caught up in whether she deleted it this way or that way, the bottom line is it wasn't her choice to make. >> precisely. >> we'll see if she certified otherwise in her of-109. good to see you. >> good to see you megyn, always. >> we posted that form of-109. we told you you will be hearing more about it. certainly you have and will. we have also posted our freedom of information act request on our facebook page. trust us, the show that broke this story is staying on this story until we have an answer. hey state, free jen psaki. >>> plus, new fallout tonight from the brutal beating. this is terrible. of a teenage girl. and a 5-ye

e-mails that were personal in nature that you didn't also delete e-mails that were professional but possibly unflattering? >> well, first of all you would have to ask that question to every single federal employee because the way the system works, the federal employee, the individual, whether they have one device, two devices three devices, how many addresses, they make the decision. >> reporter: republicans investigating the 2012 benghazi attacks were not satisfied with that and said clinton should turn over her server to an independent third-party neutral observer. but, scott, clinton said her private server will remain just that, private. >> pelley: noon see thank you. now let's bring in john dickerson. john, the partisans are going to believe what they want to believe. there is no chance any minds were changed there today so what difference does any of this make in hillary clinton's campaign for the democratic presidential nomination? >> reporter: i think part of that answer will come from whether we're still talking about this closer to election time. and that depends on when a

she said she deleted them all. she said her personal account was secure and never used it for classified material. >> the system we used was set up for president clinton's office. it had numerous safeguards. it was on property guarded by the secret service and there were no security breaches. >> cnn senior washington correspondent is outfront right now outside the united nations where secretary clinton spoke today. we know secretary clinton turned over tens thousands of e-mails but she also kept tens of thousands of e-mails. we learned some new things today. >> reporter: we sure did. she put a finer number on these e-mails. there were more than 60,000 in total. 62,300 total e-mails. she turned over 30,490. 31,830 she says were personal in nature and as we heard you say, you asked the question she deleted those. that's the question here. she's policing herself. should she be making decisions which are deleted and which are saved. >> it's a very good question. it's still outstanding. her office they explained why she

she deleted the e-mails.they go onto say that therefore no e-mails -- this is from her 6 nos>cñ e-mails from her entire tenure as secretary of state reside on the server anymore, nor on any backup system associated with the server. now, i@(" to know whatú=áe that means. there's still a lot of 670 questions. what did she do to wipe the server clean? and is it really clean?:; can't we still let the third party take a look just to see what's really been wiped clean and what hasn't? >> because they're afraid if you6s)zj allow a third party to look ate, low and behold they might be then all the stuff she doesn't want to come out will come out. no one goes throughlj steps that you'ren>vú describing when they have nothing to hide. i mean, if this Ñ is just her yoga schedule and just her daughter's wedding no one goes toú1n much trouble to hide their yoga schedule. >> that leads to the big question in all of this in theh[%b e-mails? and if she really didaóqd delete them and wipe the server cleanqe then let's staff'su

the private address while secretary of state, the questions it's raising and what e-mails did she delete? we're live in washington with the latest. >>> new this morning, more fallout in ferguson following the justice department's scathing report on racial bias in the city. the powerful official now stepping down. >>> quick decision. an officer avoids injury by jumping into the car he just pulled over. the dramatic moment caught on camera. >>> and song stolen. the verdict is in. a jury says a distinctive tune from robin thicke and pharrell was used before, and there is a multimillion dollar damage being done. >>> well, good wednesday morning to you. hillary clinton appears to have done little to convince critics about her use of private e-mails as secretary of state. >> yeah, addressing the issue for the first time, clinton claims it was simpler to use one device instead of two. >> and she admits to deleting e-mails from her private account but only e-mails about personal matters like yoga and her daughter's wedding. with the latest we're joined by abc's bazi kanani in washington. hi, baz

at the state department and allowed her to decide later which records to make public and which to delete. nancy cordes put the question to the former secretary and future candidate. >> reporter: clinton emerged from a speech at the u.n. to face a crowd of hundreds of journalists. she issued this mea culpa.su >> looking back, it would have been better for me to use two separate phones and two e-mailac accounts. i thought using one device would be simpler, and, obviously, it hasn't worked out that way. >> reporter: clinton claimed that the private server sheit shared with her husband at their home in new york was secure and was never hacked, and that she never e-mailed classified material. >> first, the laws and regulations in effect when i was secretary of state allowed me to use my e-mail for work. that is undisputed. >> reporter: federal regulations from 2009 require that federal records sent or received on private e-mail accounts must be preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system, but clinton didn't turn over her e- mails until this past december nearly two years after sh

all of the other e-mails and when she said deleted, it will be detried. and there will be no way to recover them if they get access to the server. and it seems to me, a lot of the good things that happen in the clinton years. peace and prosperity and all of that under the pressure of the republican house. and there were also bad things. the scandal and legal parsipling of words. and it reminds democrats and independents and republicans of the bad part of the clinton years and i would think that if you are a democrat the idea of a coronation and hillary clinton being their nominee, it would be a cause of some concern for democrats you have to wonder how she would wear after last tuesday. >> i fully complied with every rule i was governed by and that is one thing that bothers the critics, is that she was not necessarily following the rules if you read the state department and national archives requirements, she was not rules, but the argument and the point they make is that hillary clinton and bill clinton in the past, sort of made their own rules. >> yeah,

she said she deleted personal e-mails. i have zero interest in looking at her personal e-mails why care about her yoga practice or bridesmaids dresses. why want to see that but who decides what is personal and what is public? if silt a mixed use e-mail and a last e-mails we get in life are both personal and work, i cannot trust her lawyers to make the determination the public is getting everything they are spilitessed -- entitled to. >> she was specifically asked about having an independent someone neutrally agreeable come in and look at the server and that is when she said it will remain private. >> there are a lot of ways to motivate people. one is public pressure. if it becomes an issue for her, if the public believes it is reasonable for her to turn over that server which contains public information to a neutral detached around -- arbiter, she will be forced to otherwise the house of representatives could be forced to go to court to get access. the house of representatives has in business lobbying at purely personal e-

when a document is deleted, it's not erased from the hard drive.ad, the space occupied by that document is labelled available to reuse if necessary. >> by going through that disc mathematically, finding the proper clusters based upon the known interleaving of the drive, you can piece together an entire document if the file space that that document occupied had not been overwritten. >> when this crime was committed in 1988, there were no computer programs that could reassemble documents that had been deleted. so al johnson and his team had to do something that had never been done before. they had to do the analysis manually. >> it's a painstaking process that took approximately 33 days to look at two, 20-megabyte hard drives. >> a computer is about as secure as a wet paper bag. it never throws data away. >> they found bits and pieces of a document kopenheffer had deleted called "the plan." it listed all of the steps necessary to carry out sally weiner's kidnapping and murder. >> we were able to recover 80% of the plan back off of the hard drive. 20%

the rules say you have to turn them over. >> why did you delete the personal e-mails? >> i'd be happy to have somebody talk to you about the rules, i fully complied. >> reporter: were you briefed in the security implications of using your own e-mail server and using personal address to e-mail with the president? >> i did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. there is no classified material. so i am certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material. [ inaudible ] >> because they were personal and private about matters that i believed were within the scope of my personal privacy, and that particularly of other people. they had nothing to do with work, but i didn't see any reason to keep them. >> reporter: when did you delete them? >> at the end of the process. >> reporter: forced to resign because of his use of personal e-mail. by the way david shuster. >> i think you should go online and read the entire ig report, that is not an accurate representation of what happened. thank you. thank you. thank you all.

my browsing history, i deleted it. i deleted pictures.ed everything because i just thought they could come back here. you know, i just didn't know what case they had against me. maybe they had been watching me when i was with fred. i was thinking of every possible scenario that i had been quite reckless. >> hello? >> that night my phone rang and it was my wife, and she was hysterical. she said i -- i've had a reporter from one of the national newspapers has called me and he has told me that you were arrested and that you're going to be executed for being gay. >> what? no, no, no. >> i knew that i had to get out of saudi arabia really quickly. >> but how do i get out of here? they have my passport. >> my friends were really worried about me. and they feared that i could possibly be executed or taken back to jail. one of them, she said to me, you know what? i think that we need to get you out. in saudi arabia, you just can't leave the country. you have to surrender our passports when we went to the hospital. and i said but how do i get out

but what could find it in -- all in the classified boxfish she deleted that to make for francine emails about a dream the journal's. the server has cleaned up half of the contents but is probably in great shape but will take an act of congress to finally reveal the contents? i am sure she will throw that away to from the dusty foia request and the vince foster papers. tonight finding off that marvin gaye was ripped off. plus going base to base and a news conference today what remains for boxing with a means for you. i am kennedy. kennedy: in my crazy to think secretary clinton's actions are shady or illegal? this is a "you're crazy, kennedy" emily is the campaign director for the center for american progress action fund and david is a former state department official who will know all about this. i will start with you. welcome to both of you. david, how do think secretary clinton did with her press conference? >> if it was a little bit awkward. it was all smiles at the beginning at the end it looked to belittle like the b-2 is making an argument to the court. we saw the lawyer of hillar