can the cal department of public health serve in that entity? >> yes. i've worked with the california department of public health radiological health branch. they have manpower, personnel, and equipment who can do independent scans that is from a government agency. they did a lot of work, and supervisor kim is very familiar with it at treasure island. if it were determined that there was a reason to find areas on parcel a or -- >> supervisor cohen: or g or b -- >> oh, yes, on any of the other parcels, they could provide independent review. they've done oversight in the past. during the tetratech rework, they were alongside of the rework on some of the interior buildings, and they have pictures of the california department of public health overseeing that work. >> so are there any numbers from other areas of the city, such as crissy field or district four that we can moan tore the radiation in the environment to better understand what the goal is for cleanup at the hunters point shipyard? >> there are lots of background radiation examples that can be revi

updike said the department of public health may only have two remaining month-to-month leases. there were a number in 2014 that had been resolved but this director requested department of public health to report back, they have 21 leases during the budget review, otherwise we recommend approval. >> supervisor cohen: thank you very much. i'm sorry, you guys, denise and raul? no? >> good afternoon, dave, department of public health. >> supervisor cohen: got it, got it. >> [inaudible] >> supervisor cohen: state that louder in the mic. >> i'm with the department of public health, children youth family, i'm assistant director -- [off mic] >> supervisor cohen: perfectly great. thank you. i don't have any specific questions at this time. i will go to public comment. i see none of my colleagues have questions. public comment is open. all right, seeing none, public comment is closed. let's, i'll accept the b.l.a.'s suggestion and approve and send with positive recommendation. >> i don't believe this recommendation requires an amendment to the legislation. >> supervisor cohen: is that rig

when department of public health started a program to get tobacco sales signage out of the stores, they were the first ones, if i can go to the overhead, please, to get the department of public health beautification award because they were the first ones to realize to have it out of kids line of sight. they don't need to see this kind of advertising. but what are we asking for you? we are asking you to ensure the financial security of this family and this business; that they should have the staples that the neighborhood has gone to them over the 40 years. they'll still go to them, they'll buy other things. it's going to need an exception from this 19 h rule, it's going to need the board of appeals to realize that 19 h wasn't intended to do harm, it was intended to go good, and the las of avloss -- loss of "save mart" will be a loss to this neighborhood, and see into the heart of what the bayview wants and help them out here. >> clerk: thank you. we will now hear from the department of public health. >> good evening, board members. i'm the assistant director requewith the environmental h

you know, in discussions we've had with the department of health before tonight's hearing, i don't believe the department of health has any objection to the ban being lifted because the new tenants, the new spa that's going in there has been highly vetted. the purpose of the legislation has been fulfilled. it's cleansed any tentacles of the previous owner. the purpose of the legislation has been fulfilled. the only effect remaining is a punitive effect in limiting the owner's property rights. >> i'm not sure i agree, but that's all right. questions further? okay. do they have anymore time, gary? [inaudible] >> if you want to make a quick statement, go ahead. >> my name is mickey sparks, and just, i wanted to say simple statement that if i did some wrong things or violate the law, and if i deserve a penalty, i would -- i would take it, but what i'm saying is without notifying me, without telling -- giving me opportunity to correct the -- my tenant is wrong operating, and all of a sudden, getting a penalty is not fair. that's all i wanted to say because i am a very, very proactive and enthus

of the health code. once the settlement was reached, dph informed the planning department of the confirmed violation. in response, the planning department sent the property owner a notice of enforcement that pursuant to planning code section 202.2(a) 4 no new massage establishment could operate on the property for three years because it had been found to be in violation of article 29 of the health code. however because the violating establishment had already vacated the premises, the planning department could not issue a notice of violation. instead, the planning department informed the owner they could request a notice of letter and that could be appealed. the appellant's central claim is the owner was not sufficiently notified of the dph violation against moulinrouge. the owner was presented and signed both notices of violation, and those are shown as exhibits 1 and 2 in our brief. additionally, the appellant's rehearing -- [inaudible] >> -- the property management company responsible for the subject property informing here of the violation and specifically referencing another violation nearby that

in addition, dtsc also works in collaboration with the california department of public health, who is the state authority on radiological matters. so regarding the issues of concern, dtsc's experts have been working closely with u.s.e.p.a. region nine and cdph experts as well as department of the navy to review radiological testing of parcel a and other parcels at this site. we are aware that tetratech fault identified data at that region and dtsc and u.s.e.p.a. region nine and cdph have recommended that parcel g as well as other parcels previously tested by tetratech be retested. the navy is also in agreement that those parcels need to be retested and is preparing a work plan as you heard that will be reviewed and evaluated by e.p.a. region nine, by dtsc, by cdph and will be shared with your departments for review and comments. dtsc and california department of public health are committed to work with e.p.a. region nine and the navy to have retesting begin as expeditiously as possible, however the timing of the cleanup will depend on results of retesting. and i know that was one of t

the department of health and human services will take a range of immediate actions to implement the president's plan. i would like to welcome secretary azar to the podium to speak about this and take a few questions to speak about the

the inspector general of the department of health and human services has come to a similar conclusion that over sight of the program has been inconsistent. and hrsa lacks authority to over see it. to improve over sight, the inspector general recommended hrsa clarify which patients are eligible to receive 340 b drugs. how they can use pharmacies to dispense 340 drugs. another concern raised by the inspector general is that states need have more information about the price and discount of drugs in the program properly reimbursed through medicaid. it recommended that there be more transparency on the price of 340 b drugs to ensure states are making accurate payments. i hear often that hospitals and clinics are are using the 340 b program to benefit low income patients or serve another worthy public objective. but i'd like to hear more about if hrsa's lack of over sight authority has made it difficult for us to have agreement on the common set of data about the 340b program so that we can make such determinations. senator murry. >> thank you very much, mr. chairman. and i'm glad that we'r

health team to provide support to one of the community clinic organizations. in the northwestern part of puerto rico. the response to emergencies is one of the core responsibilities of any health departmentncisco health department has had decades of experience, so we felt obligated to assist the puerto rican people and their communities medical providers. you'll hear more from the staff, they supported the clinical staff and continued to provide care to thousands, the clinics in puerto rico. our staff crossed rivers and climbed mountains with local clinic staff to provide medical and psychological support in people's homes. we want to continue to support these clinics and we encourage catastrophens to help us. -- san franciscans to help us. we set up a fund at our public health foundation and all the dollars go to the clinics to continue their efforts. i'm so proud today. and i had my own experience of running a community clinic in a middle of a disaster. i know how important it is to get the support we provided to these clinics, so i want to ask the staff to come up and talk about their experience. the first one is ramona. she'll give opening remarks. [applause] >> hello, everyone. my n

and the department of health and human services office of the inspector general. they have examined and published a number of oversight reports from the 340b program. we will have a third hearing, which was suggested by senator cain. we'll have that later this year to hear from the health resources and services administration. and today's hearing, the gao, the department of health and human services office of inspector general are non- partisan federal watchdogs that issue recommendations on how federal programs can run better. in 2011, gao found the first oversight of the program was, "inadequate." saying the oversight is inadequate because it primarily relies on covered entities and manufacturers self-missing. that's participants ensuring their own compliance with program requirements. in 2014 they drafted regulations to find where the patient is. however they were sued in 2014. the courts found a lack of statutory authority to engage in such rule making. limiting what they could do to oversee the program. the inspector general of the department of health and hu

for many years, the navy has worked closely with epa, california department of public health and the department of toxic substances control to achieve our common goal of environmental cleanup that is protective of human health and environment. we have a positive and productive working relationship with the city of san francisco and look forward to continuing that relationship with the future. we are appreciative of the funding provided by congress to support this site. and the extensive cleanup effort. as we move forward, the city of san francisco residents and policymakers can trust that the navy and regulatory agencies will uphold our mutual goal of ensuring that the environmental work is properly completed and the remaining 858 acres have safely transferred to the city. the navy has put measures in place ensuring quality assurance, compliance and oversight measures. again, thank you for the opportunity to discuss our extensive cleanup efficients at the former hunters point shipyard today. we look forward to a successful conclusion of our work at hunters point. we were determined th

last month the department of def health and human services officials say the agency had lost track ofhem. >> trevor: the department of health and human services lost 1,500 immigrant children. how do you lose 1,500 children? if you want to find them let r. kelly sniff their clothes. come on, pide piper, use your powers for good! ( laughter ) if your opinion only reading the headlines and tweets, you would have thought the trump administration captured and lost 1,500 kids. people online lost their shit. this is an outrage! how could donald trump lose our precious immigrant babies! i'm so angry i could scream! that's how it starts. someone reads a headline, start a hashtag, do theirin' hashtag route research and that cause as snowball of outrage. but the truth is trump hasn't lost any kids. >> there may be a reason the kids can't be found. they don't want to be. >> the department of health and human services say they are not missing but unaccounted for because sponsors have refused to respond to follow-up calls. sources in shelters say some sponsors could be undocumented as well and don'

the case is being investigated by multiple ace the department of public health, san francisco sheriffs department, san francisco police department, and the san francisco fire department. late this afternoon we saw the medical examiner's van leave and take this woman's body. the cause of death unknown at this time. we're also not able to share the age or approximate age of the woman. now, the department of public health spoke person says that they were not acting on a missing person report when this woman's body was found. but now that her body has been found they also can't say whether or not she was a missing person. furthermore, they don't know whether or not the woman was a patient at the hospital. here is what else the department of public health spokesperson had to say this afternoon. >> we're very concerned that this happened. we don't know how this woman gained access to the area where she was found and we are absolutely looking into that. we're very concerned that that happened. >> reporter: and the reason they are concerned about that is because this area is not accessible to

in this case, at the department of health testified that they gave constructive notice to the landlord when their health inspector, giving a list of violations to the on-site manager. they have produced no document substantiating that fact. we have the on-site manager here tonight who will testify and has testified in the past. that they never signed anything. but even beyond that, even if there were adequate notice, there was never notice of hearing to be heard, and there was never a hearing which is an essential element of the due process protection. as such, we are asking the board to lift the ban and to grant to the appeal. [please standby] . ease standby] >> -- however, we were given absolutely no opportunity in this case to get involved because we were not given any noticed despite miss kim and mr. montiel's statements. it is our practices that no -- our practice that no notices are ever unaddressed and ignored, especially one of this nature. in spite of our efforts in getting involved, we have been completely shut out by the department of public health when it came to the disclo

land use committee this afternoon, as well's representatives from the navy, the epa and the department of health. -- department of health. >>> the golden state killer is due back in court. the search and arrest warrants will be made public. joseph deangelo has a routine hearing today. it's alleged that he is the serial rapist and so-called golden state killer responsible for 12 murders and nearly 50 rapes in the 1970s and 1980s. some organizations want the documents unsealed. >>> a sheriff's deputy is recovering after being shot at a bay area carwash. the owner of jolly rogers carwash said he was acting strangely and appeared to be armed with a bb gun. they said the man was standing behind a truck in the car wash line and they said one officer went to speak with him. >> he stepped out and exposed himself and removed a handgun from his waistband and fired at the deputy. the deputy returned fire. >> investigators believe the deputy was hit with multiple pellets and has been flown to the hospital. is expected to be okay. who reportedly hid behind the truck and surrendered when the gun jammed and no

federal layer, a state layer, and a local layer, and i just want to speak to our local department of public health. i'm incredibly disappointed. you are our agency, you represent the board of supervisors, and i just thought that the responses that were stated today were unacceptable. department of public health should be fighting on behalf of our residents. we should be demand be accountability. we cannot be colluding and collaborating with them. i just think given what we've heard today, we have to be committed to the position of retesting, and i look forward to working with our current mayor and board of supervisors to ensure that happens. we need to be the community advocate, not the advocate for the federal contractor. i think overall, i'm just going to express my dismay and utter disgust at what is happening. i cannot believe that tra

of 94 million is being driven by department operations. that $84 million improvement again the vast majority of that driven by the department of public health and good news we are seeing there. tax revenues, city-wide revenue surplus of 21.4 million, and then a host of other smaller up and down. [please stand by]. >> this is easily our most volatile revenue in the city. it's paid at the moment properties change hands and given the -- given the changes the voters have adopted, we have higher rates that becomes a key driver of what the tax looks like. and the rate at which those changed hands is very uneven. you can see here what that performance looked like in recent years. and you can see how jagged and volatile this tax can be. in '08-'09 at the beginning of the last recession, we had a year that we received $50 million for an entire year. and you can see the improvement we've seen since then, largely driven by both rate increases and more transactions of downtown office, hotels, and other large commercial properties. there were times in '16-'17 where in a single month we received more transfer month than we did in the entirety of '08-'09.

federal layer, a state layer, and a local layer, and i just want to speak to our local department of public health. i'm incredibly disappointed. you are our agency, you represent the board of supervisors, and i just thought that the responses that were stated today were unacceptable. department of public health should be fighting on behalf of our residents. we should be demand be accountability. we cannot be colluding and collaborating with them. i just think given what we've heard today, we have to be committed to the position of retesting, and ik

so on march 7, 2016, the san francisco department of public health achieved the arduous work of becoming a fully accredited public health department by the national public health accreditation board. [applause]. >> the accreditation is for conducting high quality continuous improving core public health services. nod in addition to the strategic plan, the community health assessment and the community health improvement plan, using standards and erbmas, we must demonstrate organizational competencies in 12 public health domains: community assessments, field investigations, health education and information dissemination, community engagement, policy development and planning, legal enforcement, ensuring access to health services, workforce development, continuous quality improvement, research and evidence based practice, administration and management and governance. the public health accreditation team led by karen pierce reviewed thousands of documents and have selected and meticulously prepared over 500 documents for review by the public health accreditation board. this has been a huge und

also expected, representatives from the navy, epa and the department of health. >>> it is 65:55 -- in time for your final five. >>> in hawaii, the erupting kilauea volcano created another fissure in the surface. is the latest of nearly 20 fissures that have open since may 3rd with residents preparing for more. >>> in a few hours, the suspected golden state killer is due back in court. the judges considering the idea of making search warrants public. prosecutors allege that joseph james deangelo, the so-called golden gate killer, is responsible for 12 murders and 50 rapes. >>> tesla faces scrutiny after another crash involving a vehicle. police are looking into whether or not the autopilot feature was on at the time of the crash in utah on friday. >>> president donald trump is inviting lawmakers from southern california to the white house. they represent a federal lawsuit against the state over the sanctuary policies and the president wants to talk about immigration on wednesday. >>> protesting between israeli forces and palestinians are growing on the gaza border with at least 37 peop

article 25, we've complied with the requirements of 25 with respect to this public health compatibility standard and with the requirements that the department of public health ha had for 20 years regarding addressing the 100 foot requirement. the citation that appellant's counsel raised says this is for significant contributions. there are no significant contributions from any nearby facility. i want bill to have an opportunity to answer some of the other questions that were raised during the question period. >> thank you. i'm sorry i failed to address the continuous question that had been raised. the standards include safety factor intended to protect for continuous exposure. so there's not an additional factor that comes into play for exposure to might be continuous. that's already built in. the standards adoptedded by the fcc are applied for 24 hour exposure 7 days a week. so there's no additional research or something or factor that has to be taken into account. that's already built into the standard with 50 fold safety factor. the issue was disclosure. that's the very first question that is asked by the department of public health in t

we, the department of public health have so corrupted, and i have fought many of the cases to court, to labor relation, but it's not addressed. and you as a supervisor sitting in here can think about how you can do some more effective regulations to protect the workers. just not long ago we had a protest in front of 101 grove because our policy failed to protect people of color. many of our workers are people of color. they are african american and they are asian employees, and they have been taken advantage of because of their color. now is the time for you to think about if you want to protect our city and use the lawsuit to build for houses for affordable housing for teachers and protect our children and give them the access that they're supposed to have when they're young. again, my name is ellen lee zhou, and i am a union bargaining team member, and i want you guys to respect -- i can't believe. i'm talking to the air right now. you guys are focused to your phone. i'm sorry to see. this is public hearings. this is like court. you are in public office and you are responsible for