i'm not on some doj rant. they twisted the truth. but i began to realize when i watched it very closely with labor but that article later said they get the inside tip. you'll get screwed because you did what we wanted over here. that's not free press. that's not reporting. that's quit broke all nonsense. unfortunately the media today and i've actually had a lot of luck with european media because there is less influence. but there's some good media in this country and i've had some good success with getting my story out. but it's a big problem in the problem is that it's now been ingrained because people feel reporting is not like it used to be. it's hard to do an investigative story and get to the heart of the problem. >> kevin callahan i'm a huge fan of the story. i do have a question. i feel a little uncomfortable being in washington and asking this question. jericho. a very relevant issue today and i would like you to shed a little light on what you feel about that subject. >> everybody would like to take their own task. capital

importantly communities key stakeholders to move forward with the areas to implement immediately the doj process and assess and progress on some of the police reforms needed 24 included key highlights and key policy recommendations that demonstrated our leadership here of what we needed to move forward with san francisco i'd like to highlight one of the major outcomes we saw where $20 million investment to subcontract trainings on equipment and to also improve the cultural sensitive in the police department we moved with significant programming in the forest to be able to begin looking at building trust between communities and communities of color and the police department after 6 months of working with the doj cops staff their staff worked closely to complete 2k59 analyze and public members of the committee and realized a comprehensive assessment one of the most comprehensive assessments of any police department in this nation yes, they found dishes but a police department that will have change the cops office want to build the trust in the result was 94 finding 200 plus recommended in

doj put business in, he has put jeff sessions in. furthermore, melissa, president-elect trump is playing this smart. certainly a wide check and people voted for him because of him primarily, i believe, and i do think that they will be more forgiving on some of policies as long as it's not too extreme. he has playing room. >> everyone is saying he's not going to listen to anyone. that's a good point. i'm going to consider that. it's exactly what we would want our commander in chief to do, vowpped himself with the best people to listen to them and cut bureaucracy and red tape that's been stiffing job creation and preventing america and give the guy a chance. >> you talk about regulation and that maybe add to go what is being called the trump-bump. u.s. stocks soar to go record high since election day. will it continue and do we really have the president elect to thank? plus a liberal art college is taking down the american flag, officials say the move is to promote a meaningful dialogue but is this really the way to go or just a slap i

at our policies and procedures the department worked chlorite with the policing cops as far as the dojnitiative this most long process was comprehensive heavy reilly on police commissioners and city leaders and other stakeholders the collaborative review initiative gave complete access to owl information and contained on 5 areas i'll go over them the use of force and the second bias and the third was policing and the fifth was a recruitment and hiring person the final report it is 92 findings all of which the department is completed to implementing as of any change the times are hard to pinpoint the priorities but this independent assessment has been our road map to reform it is important to note prior to the onslaught one of the first suggestions the department should have a bureau dedicated to acknowledge and transparent were a top priority and tracking experience with the findings and recommendations that may came into from the review the professional standards and bureau was created in february to oversee and facilitate 9 collaborative assessment process and to coordinate the imple

at our policies and procedures the department worked chlorite with the policing cops as far as the doj initiative this most long process was comprehensive heavy reilly on police commissioners and city leaders and other stakeholders the collaborative review initiative gave complete access to owl information and contained on 5 areas i'll go over them the use of force and the second bias and the third was policing and the fifth was a recruitment and hiring person the final report it is 92 findings all of which the department is completed to implementing as of any change the times are hard to pinpoint the priorities but this independent assessment has been our road map to reform it is important to note prior to the onslaught one of the first suggestions the department should have a bureau dedicated to acknowledge and transparent were a top priority and tracking experience with the findings and recommendations that may came into from the review the professional standards and bureau was created in february to oversee and facilitate 9 collaborative assessment process and to coordinate the imp

at our policies and procedures the department worked chlorite with the policing cops as far as the doj initiative this most long process was comprehensive heavy reilly on police commissioners and city leaders and other stakeholders the collaborative review initiative gave complete access to owl information and contained on 5 areas i'll go over them the use of force and the second bias and the third was policing and the fifth was a recruitment and hiring person the final report it is 92 findings all of which the department is completed to implementing as of any change the times are hard to pinpoint the priorities but this independent assessment has been our road map to reform it is important to note prior to the onslaught one of the first suggestions the department should have a bureau dedicated to acknowledge and transparent were a top priority and tracking experience with the findings and recommendations that may came into from the review the professional standards and bureau was created in february to oversee and facilitate 9 collaborative assessment process and to coordinate the imp

h dj -- doj has nn could i if i dense left. >> keep your comments coming.he time is 36 after the hour. donald trump turning attention to the blue states. >> hasn't in 35 years or something like that. no republican has won since reag reagan>> how could it impact the senate? >> how many wol wean costumes are going viral? a lot of them. this one is forcing a police officer to apologize. what is trending? coming up nice to see you this morning. >> stay with us. . . >> the count down is on. one week until the election. donald trump is using the new fbi probe and hillary clinton's e-mail server to stop the blue state in his final days of the presidential campaign. >> michigan hasn't in 35 years or something like that, no republican has won since like reagan or many years ago. oh, you are even in michigan. let's go to michigan? we just left another place. i said let's go and win it. >> how could this impact the senate? here to break down the most vulnerable seat at kings college in new york scott rasmussen. thank you for joining us on this tuesday. seven days to g

at our policies and procedures the department worked chlorite with the policing cops as far as the doj initiative this most long process was comprehensive heavy reilly on police commissioners and city leaders and other stakeholders the collaborative review initiative gave complete access to owl information and contained on 5 areas i'll go over them the use of force and the second bias and the third was policing and the fifth was a recruitment and hiring person the final report it is 92 findings all of which the department is completed to implementing as of any change the times are hard to pinpoint the priorities but this independent assessment has been our road map to reform it is important to note prior to the onslaught one of the first suggestions the department should have a bureau dedicated to acknowledge and transparent were a top priority and tracking experience with the findings and recommendations that may came into from the review the professional standards and bureau was created in february to oversee and facilitate 9 collaborative assessment process and to coordinate the imp

at our policies and procedures the department worked chlorite with the policing cops as far as the dojis most long process was comprehensive heavy reilly on police commissioners and city leaders and other stakeholders the collaborative review initiative gave complete access to owl information and contained on 5 areas i'll go over them the use of force and the second bias and the third was policing and the fifth was a recruitment and hiring person the final report it is 92 findings all of which the department is completed to implementing as of any change the times are hard to pinpoint the priorities but this independent assessment has been our road map to reform it is important to note prior to the onslaught one of the first suggestions the department should have a bureau dedicated to acknowledge and transparent were a top priority and tracking experience with the findings and recommendations that may came into from the review the professional standards and bureau was created in february to oversee and facilitate 9 collaborative assessment process and to coordinate the implementation of

when a government agency between doj and fbi, they are in complete conflict within the fbi and doj over special counsels, reason leaking is sometimes needed is times when the institutions of government is just broken. example of that. if someone involved in that thinks it's in the public good to let information come out to the press why going to be -- >> got to take a break. have more. talk to the panel. lot more to weigh in on. including hillary clinton sharing the first lady's mantra, key words. when they go low we go high but following that? jay-z at rally tonight. ♪ trying to stretch up ♪ i got the discounts dothat you need ♪l ♪ ♪ safe driver ♪ accident-free ♪ everybody put your flaps in the air for me ♪ ♪ go paperless, don't stress, girl ♪ ♪ i got the discounts that you need ♪ ♪ safe driver ♪ accident-free ♪ everybody put your flaps in the air for me ♪ i can't lip-synch in these conditions. ♪ savings ♪ oh, yeah >>> well, we are just four days away from election day, but who's really counting. polls show the race is really tightening. hillary clinton's playbook could be changing. yo

in my experience, that is not the result of what do .uagadougou -- the doj did you look in malaysia? china,have a bribe in you better look at the entire world. i think companies do that. they did an investigation of the entire walls. entire world. they may have internal business reasons why they want to do that, but we are at the was telling him to do that. >> i do think that is a change because i know there have been we -- i do think that the effort and the stated objective, to really be more certain -- more surgical. ranks -- the bank and the u.s. attorney's offices throughout the country. that you should not be boiling -- stay surgical on the >> there are some cases where you do have [indiscernible] >> can we shift the focus that blas well. on, ms. we have a couple of major treaties. dealing with anticorruption. what is the relationship between peace treaties and the department enforcement of the fet a? >> we work closely with -- we are a member of the idc working group on bribery. we go to their meetings. we also work with the countries involved in the u.n. effort. former differe

that's doj on the record.hen went to say it is not department practice to provide strategic guidance to any campaign. when asked if his behavior was acceptable to justice, they did not answer. >> they made a mistake. they should have said he is assistant attorney general he has the ability to wave prove ledges, wave confidences. they made it worse by saying it was on his private gmail. that violate federal records laws. those are justice department e-mails on gmail account so they double down and made it worse with that excuse. >> you know what the thing about this is, not only do we see these and have questions about what was going on between these individuals but how many times is this happening out there that were weren't captured by wikileaks. e-mailing someone other than podesta who was the one that got hacked, so we don't know about it. >> we do know about a second instance in wikileaks dump today of another clinton campaign worker getting this tip off from the day before that there was going to be an im

several things how can we expect to get to the three hundred plus recommendations presented by the doj and the blue ribbon panel and can't get though the removal of shooting at the vehicles the doj has made it clear they'll not accept that type of language in the use of force order how can we get to through 1/3rd of recommendations that are presented with the union it continues to resist change the process lacks transparent and seems to be substantive not to mention allegations of commissioners speaking pubically and posturing and stating who they want to be the next chief this is inappropriate we must stop right now we must show that we representative reform we must show we support transparent what i want to do the right thing in the eastbound selection of the next chief the chief i've stated need to be one that has a proven track record and is a viable candidate that will be of our interest to everyone i stand before you also extremely troublgd by the san francisco chronicle news article that reelevated some of the candidates locations of where we come from that is very concerning i

it obviously tells the rest of us how doj has arrived at something. but if there's undue pressure, what i would encourage the department of justice to do is do it on a no name basis. publish the detail. publish the information as to the outcome, but don't give the information about what company is at issue. that would still serve the purpose of being informative and also could attract the disclosures the department is seeking. >> so i think we've had this conversation within the department about how much detail should be included under the pilot program if there's a declination. i think the cases you're talking about we had declinations with two private companies. normally when we do fcpa cases, most are public companies and most are with the sec. in most cases where we declined, the sec will file an action. it will be an action in which the company will probably neither admit liability. but they agree to disgorge so much money. that is a public document. when the department gets disgorgement from a company, it's because -- this was the case with the

cnn has learned over the past 15 months that the fbi and doj have been fighting over matters relatingo hillary clinton. not just the e-mail probe but also the investigation into the clinton foundation. >> commonly it leads to friction. and sometimes it feels like you're slowing me down for a purpose and maybe that purpose is your politics. >> reporter: sources say the clinton foundation probe has been on low boil because top doj officials don't believe the allegations of criminal activity among donors are substantive enough to issue warrants or subpoenas but the agents working the case see the road blocks as political. and we have reached out to both the department of justice and clinton campaign regarding the wikileaks e-mail that came out today, both declined to comment. >> donald trump tries to turn blue states red and key battlegrounds. david chalian is joining me. he desperately needs to win in these states. >> he needs to win all of the toss-up states and plus gain blue territory where hillary clinton has the slight edge in our polls and the polls of polls and look at the poll,

say they're very scared of who will be the head of the doj, who will be in charge of this and perhaps someone like jeff sessions, yes we can put into context that it was 30 years ago in the deep south but if he's 30 years ago in the deep south talking about this and joking about the naacp as being un-american, that's really a problematic thing. but whether or not it will keep him from being appointed is a we talked about the idea that donald trump is into loyalty. he was the first senator to take the risk to endorse donald trump and he was out there on the campaign trail for him and donald trump really values that. >> i guess my view is i do know sessions and i do think i've got problems with him, too, but i risk being too judgmental about 30 years ago. senate hearings when they look at him hold that up as a major problems like calling somebody boy, an adult african-american? >> i think this could build because it's not in a vacuum. this is coming as the trump organization -- the trump incoming administration is looking at how our streets are becoming a powder keg based on this racial

it obviously tells the rest of us how doj has arrived at something. but if there's undue pressure, what i would encourage the department of justice to do is do it on a no name basis. publish the detail. publish the information as to the outcome, but don't give the information about what company is at issue. that would still serve the purpose of being informative and also could attract the disclosures the department is seeking. >> so i think we've had this conversation within the department about how much detail should be included under the pilot program if there's a declination. i think the cases you're talking about we had declinations with two private companies. normally when we do fcpa cases, most are public companies and most are with the sec. in most cases where we declined, the sec will file an action. it will be an action in which the company will probably neither admit liability. that is a public document. when the department gets disgorgement from a company, it's because -- this was the case with the two companies recently -- they're not subj

several things how can we expect to get to the three hundred plus recommendations presented by the doj and the blue ribbon panel and can't get though the removal of shooting at the vehicles the doj has made it clear they'll not accept that type of language in the use of force order how can we get to through 1/3rd of recommendations that are presented with the union it continues to resist change the process lacks transparent and seems to be substantive not to mention allegations of commissioners speaking pubically and posturing and stating who they want to be the next chief this is inappropriate we must stop right now we must show that we representative reform we must show we support transparent what i want to do the right thing in the eastbound selection of the next chief the chief i've stated need to be one that has a proven track record and is a viable candidate that will be of our interest to everyone i stand before you also extremely troublgd by the san francisco chronicle news article that reelevated some of the candidates locations of where we come from that is very concerning i

the doj was playing a game. get him on the country and he quickly left the country and was free to go back to switzerland. it's in the book. give a follow-up question. [inaudible] i will be quite candid. the cia didn't want to move a lot of money to switzerland. it's all there. the senate testimony. senator grassley had stuff on this back in 80s. they were laundering money with the afghan drug trade. whether you like it or you don't. but it exists. but the problem here is when i first came to the government they said they have the target letters. they know you're breaking the law. what is to let you know we are investigating you. what they did was they tipped there had because they knew too many of them working to be exposed. every one of us. all pled for the nonprosecution agreement. no one was prosecuted in the united states or switzerland. i did. there's many more banks to go after. it's almost like an unbelievable story you can't even make up. when i work with my attorneys they just said this could have happ

they don't eliminate the fact that there is a split inside the fbi not only between the fbi and the doj on how this is moving forward and the extent to which they believe it is substantial but there's also a split within the fbi about this. and it is very out in the open, as you saw in the wall street journal piece that came out today. that doesn't take away from the fact that there are people still going after it every day and believe that they have a lot of information that's flowing in. >> we're going to take it around the table. >> can you shine light on this discussion within the fbi about some of the agents and some of the higher level agents upset that the doj specifically attorney general loretta lynch, wanting to push back on some of the investigation into the clinton foundation and whether that was what spurred comey to actually come out and say there's more we need to reinvestigate the clintons? >> yeah. i think that that's part of it. we don't have a lot of the granular detail about the anger. but we do know that there was anger and is anger inside the fbi about how this pro

today the doj announcing it's sending monitoring to four counties in north carolina. earlier this year, the 4th circuit court of appeals struck down a voting law in north carolina finding the law's provisions targeted african-americans with almost surgical precision. joining me now jason johnson. jason, you know, i recall back in 2000 there was a voter purge of voters in florida. >> right. >> famously. in which this same tactic was used, a piece of mail sent, if it's returned you can contest the person. a lot of times returned because they're living with a grandmother or something like that. >> right. >> but this is a -- the wording of the federal judge today was very strong. >> well, and it has to be, chris, because this is a step back for all american citizens. i mean, the process by which a letter being sent to your house can smau eliminate your right to vote like if i knock on your door three times and you don't answer i can assume it's abandoned and i can take your house. what's key also is this. this is what happens because we have lost the preclearance element

terms of transformation police reform the backstop of the 21st century president obama report from the doj well our doj very, very different i'm concerned how to uphold the principles from the 21st century report in the face of what the effects will be trying to you know put forwarding in terms of law and order and presidency and get to the poa i'm really concerned about how much we have to be very vigilant with the instruction the poa will be creating here in san francisco the leadership of the police officers association had done a lot that payroll supporting the republicans and 84 percent of the city voted for clinton did you sent money to the republican policy and voted but the poa - 71 percent wanted to repeal but the poa do not to oppose it 69 percent voted against prop 66 that expected the death penalty. >> the poa to defend that we know that the resources are moving us back in the 21st century policing by the obama administration i think we need to be much stronger as a city to figure out how to bring them to the kind of reform and vision of the policing that is about building trus

>> what i would expect is what has been yup held, the doj is the nation's cop.o police departments that are doing civil rights violations, that's what was done with baltimore, done obviously with ferguson. given sessions history, asking actually praised trump as recently as august of 2016 on calling for the death of five men called the central park five, most people know that, way after the years they were exonerated, he's believed in stop and frisk which is something that is not legally upheld in the united states, or certainly -- >> sure it has been. >> i don't have much time. kevin, i'll get your response to that. >> now? >> yes. >> sorry. a lot of the policies that she's talking about, they are legal and they do prevent crime. >> wasn't held up by a court in new york. >> well, you know, that may be true but it's not illegal. but the point is this. these policies do work, they do stop crime in the neighbors where they should be stopping crime. >> i will stop you there. it's good of both of you to come on. conversation will continue. thank you. >>> all right.

several things how can we expect to get to the three hundred plus recommendations presented by the doj and the blue ribbon panel and can't get though the removal of shooting at the vehicles the doj has made it clear they'll not accept that type of language in the use of force order how can we get to through 1/3rd of recommendations that are presented with the union it continues to resist change the process lacks transparent and seems to be substantive not to mention allegations of commissioners speaking pubically and posturing and stating who they want to be the next chief this is inappropriate we must stop right now we must show that we representative reform we must show we support transparent what i want to do the right thing in the eastbound selection of the next chief the chief i've stated need to be one that has a proven track record and is a viable candidate that will be of our interest to everyone i stand before you also extremely troublgd by the san francisco chronicle news article that reelevated some of the candidates locations of where we come from that is very concerning i

that being said i'm sure is that what the doj will primarily focus on. guess that there are couple of things here from a legal perspective. one is that there is a big question whether the federal communications commission, the fcc, which one would think would be absolutely in the thick of something like this one is dealing with one of our largest communication providers, our largest news and entertainment producers but because of the way the world works it's not clear what role the fcc will have. there is a lot of speculation that because at&t which is the company that is regulated at the fcc is the one buying time warner, that the deal can be structured in a way that completely avoids fcc review and that is -- scott is right to display and not always but traditionally a lot of the concerns we have been talking about, the concerns to democracy in news production, the concerns about privacy are more the subject of fcc public interest reviews and the department of justice. but i do want to emphasize that we are actually add an important shifting point in a

so was this e-mail from the doj to to tepodesta a conflict of interest?ote this, kadzic used personal e-mail to communicate with someone, a former client. it may not have been illegal. but for many americans, perhaps unseemly, too close of a relationship between the doj, that was beginning a court proceeding, and someone who was with the campaign that was the subject of that court proceeding. >> thank you very much for that report. hillary clinton is about to hold a campaign event in las vegas. earlier, she was in arizona, hoping to move that red state into her corner. brianna keilar is there for us. tonight, hillary clinton and her surrogates are campaigning full force in the final days of the campaign. update our viewers. >> reporter: that's right, wolf. and worried that some momentum in the polls may be stymied by that news that the fbi is reopening its look at her e-mails that she had while she was secretary of state, her use of a private server. she's now taking on donald trump, going negative. not the positive, hopeful message they had hoped for, th

fbi, doj, impeachment, clinton foundation. set it to me straight. >> brooke, i think one of the first things is you heard from donald trump there he says there's an indictment in the offing in this clinton foundation investigation and you know from the reporting we've been doing for a year now on this issue, we're not anywhere near close to that. we're still, frankly at the starting gates of this fbi. the fbi agents who have been doing it started with four different field offices in the fbi in los angeles, little rock, new york wanting to dig into allegations that came out in this book by a conservative writer peter schweizer, clinton cash, and the book alleged the clinton foundation was taking donations from foreign donors and exchanging them for favors while she was at the state departme department. the fbi has been looking into this and we're told they haven't gotten much further than what the allegations were in the book, brooke. >> let's talk about melania trump. she spoke to a very enthusiastic crowd in the philadelphia

we're going to get the latest live and the doj said it's watching for signs of voter intimidation in north carolina. coming up, i'll talk live with the president of the north carolina naacp. reverend william barber who said it's the epicenter of voter suppression and award winning actor, hillary clinton supporter jeffrey wright will join me live. why mr. wright said it's been hard for him not to lose patience with african-americans not supporting hillary clinton. we'll have much more all day coverage live from nbc election headquarters. this is democracy plaza you're looking at. a live picture. we'll be right back. changes to make things right. first, all customers who have been impacted will be fully refunded. second, a confirmation will be sent when new personal or small business checking, savings or credit card accounts are opened. third, we've eliminated product sales goals for our retail bankers to ensure your interests are put first. we're taking action. we're renewing our commitment to you. so dad slayed the problemt with puffs plus lotion, instead. with lotion to soothe and s

quincy, one of 67 jurisdictions nationwide where the doj has people on the ground this election day. quincy's city clerk says one of those monitors contacted her about a problem with a >> and said that her chinese wasn't that good, so we sent somebody else there. to help out. >> the reporter: while few problems have been reported so far, other observers say there's good reason to be vigilant. >> in boston years ago, we identified a precinct that placed chinese americans in separate lines, because they were moving more slowly, which is obviously a discriminatory violation of the law. >>> and in checking the doj's list today, monitors to seven communities in new hampshire, two in rhode island, but none in new hampshire hand of course, just one here in massachusetts. the feds have not returned our calls to talk about exactly how or why they chose these communities to monitor. we're live in quincy, eric rasmussen, fox 25 news. >> mark: throwing their support behind trump. what we've learned about who bill belichick and tom brady are really supporting during this election. >> vanessa: plu

and obviously it tells the rest of us how doj has arrived at something. but if there's undue pressure, what i would encourage the department of justice to consider doing is as they do in advisory opinions often is do it on a no-name basis. publish the details, publish the information as to what happened. the outcome but don't necessarily give the information about what company is at issue and that would still serve the purpose of being informative and also could attract the disclosures the department is seeking. >> i think we've had this conversation within the department about how much detail should be included under the pilot program if there's a declination. i think the cases you are talking about, we recently had declinations with two prior companies. normally when we do ftp a, most that we do our public companies and we do most of this with the scc. so in most cases where we've declined, the scc will file an action in which the company will probably neither admit nor deny liability but they will expect agree to discourage how much money and there wil

he has told fbi and doj officials that he doesn't plan to provide the public any additional updates until this investigation is complete. and that could take time. and after the election, anderson, we're expecting for this to come to an end. >> reporter: tonight, the fbi is in a race against the clock. cnn has learned a team of agents is using special software at fbi facilities in quantico, virginia, to sift through thousands of newly discovered e-mails, to isolate those relevant to the investigation of hillary clinton's private server. those e-mails will then be searched for classified information. a process that likely won't be resolved until after the election. in july, when director comey initially recommended no charges, he said no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case against clinton, despite finding classified information on her private server. >> we don't want to put people in jail unless we prove that they knew they were doing something they shouldn't do. >> reporter: cnn has learned some of the e-mails found in a computer belonging to anthony weiner, estranged husband of long

does this show improper conflict between clinton people and the doj? >> you know, it's not clear that it does. and, you know, every week we get a new allegation that there is some sort of quid pro quo and i sat in this seat any number of times and at the end of the day it terms out there is no harm. step back away from this. we have been talking about e-mails for a year and a half. nobody has said, nobody has said here is an example where this irresponsible behavior and secretary clinton acknowledged it was irresponsible and led to a decrease in our national security. nobody said the russians took this and the chinese took this and actually led to any particular harm. and, you know, look back 20, 30 years here. benghazi, eight congressional investigations. absolutely nothing. vince foster, rose law firm, the kenneth starr fishing expedition. this has gone on for 30 years. there has been an accumulation of people or stuff out there. but we have to remember that nobody and jim comey in july said we looked at this and it wasn't even close. there is no cri

doj over this. reason why leaking is sometimes needed because there are times when the institution of government is just completely broken. and this is an example of that. and if somebody involved in that thinks it is in the public good to let information come out to the press why are we going to be -- >> we got to take a break but we're going to have more on this. we're going talk to the panel. a lot more ahead for you do weigh in, including hillary clinton sharing the first lady's mantra, seven key words "when they go low we go high" but is the democratic nominee actually following that? that's next fir. first jay-z at the clinton event tonight of ♪ coaching means making tough choices. jim! you're in! but when you have high blood pressure and need cold medicine that works fast, the choice is simple. coricidin hbp is the only brand that gives powerful cold symptom relief without raising your blood pressure. coricidin hbp. what? is he gone?? finally, i thought he'd never leave... tv character: why a

so the whole doj, doj blocking our deal with humana, who's suing us, and so everybody's now running the -- you know, running the arbitrage on the deal. >> and so what happens? >> what happens with the -- >> this circumstance. does this make sense? >> i don't know what happens. i don't know what the doj does. >> imsaying to your entire business strategy, over the past year you built that whole new business strategy. >> the strategy is the same. nothing changes. 81% of the american public hate their health insurance. they hate the health care system. we have too many uninsured. it's not affordable, even for people making six figure, so it still has to be fixed. we still need to insure everybody. the approaches will be different from a policy standpoint and a funding standpoint, but we still need to have a product that's affordable, more personalized, simpler to use, that people can buy like they buy everything else today. >> is there any conceivable way that under trump there will still be -- although those 22 million americans who are part of this will still be insured at the end of the

this is jay christian adams, a former doj employees.hn podesta, what do you think about that, tipping off before actual testimony taking place 12 hours before? >> if i did this about a pleading we're about to file in court, a court document and giving them a heads-up ahead of time, i would have lost my jork but here's the assistant attorney general communicate winning podesta and somebody else communicating with the clinton campaign itself to tip them off that a court document is about to be filed about the state department emails and how long it was going to take to get them out in the public. it's extremely important information, and that's totally insider trading. to give them that heads up. >> here it is. here's the actual document and it's not been denied although it was hacked. there is an hjc oversight hearing today where the head of our civil division will testify. likely to get questions on state department emails. so other people are speculating, it's only a few hours heads up. what's the big deal. the other side didn't have a

apparently at doj prosecutors expressed doubt about a certain person's story.aying that the fbi did the right thing. here is peter schweizer last hour on "america's newsroom." >> i established a pattern that required investigation, which is what the fbi is doing. the problem is frankly, they are being denied tools by the department of justice. they have interviewed lots of people, so, for the clinton foundation to say they don't know of any investigation is just flat-out wrong. bill: doug schoen, former advisor to president bill clinton, monica crowley, online opinion editor of "the washington times," both fox news contributors. good morning to both of you. >> good morning, bill. bill: there is a report also in the past day that has been a bit lost here. apparently five outside governments or countries or entities penetrated the clinton server at one time or another. now you go back to the definition of the law, that includes the phrase, gross negligence. how else would you define gross negligence if indeed you can prove that happened, monica? >> if this report

the kind of interference with an independent doj that was literally one of the articles of impeachment against richard nixon, but even if it is a step in some people's eyes to back off that irresponsible pledge, he is wrong today to suggest this is even his call. yes, think about that. donald trump has managed to get this issue fundamentally wrong twice. independent investigators and prosecutors decide in our system whether to investigate or bring charges, not the president. and, as everyone remembers, the fbi already cleared clinton of any potential crimes for her e-mail. not this president obama and not the next one, trump's, to overturn that or act like not overturning it is some kind of presidential choice. noted by experts across the spectrum, calling it an extraordinary breach of protocol, and pointing out, look, the president doesn't decide who gets prosecuted and who doesn't. supporters are also upset, breitbart came out swinging with that headline, broken promise, trump doesn't wish to pursue e-mail charges. and lindsey graham seemed to go further, suggesting that the new admi

because of wikileaks, we have learned more about one particular doj official.ne with a friendship with chairman of hillary clinton campaign, john podesta. assistant a g . e-mails podesta, a heads up in may, 2015, warning lawmakers might question witnesses about clinton's e-mails. that e-mail sent from kasic's private e-mail account, also notified that doj will cooperate in the re opened clinton probe. wrote we assure that you department will continue to work closely with fbi, and dedicate all necessary presources and -- resources and take appropriately as expeditiously as possible. we know that pure rank clap trap as well. we have now a year's evidence of slow going on the part of the justice department to impede the investigation of both o clinton foundation. and the clinton e-mail scandal. now, president obama breaking his silence, on the reopened investigation. >> we don't operate on incomely the information. on leaks. we operate based on concrete decisions that are made. lou: one concrete station was made at justice, perhaps higher. not to pursue the invest

the decision, you can see it was not special treatment, he met the qualifications set forth by the doj and the judge realized he's not getting the care he needs in prison that he will get at home. >> compassionate release should be more available generally wehterh you have a big . it is about getting people in the proper setting given the situation they are in. reporter: dimasi will be home just in time for thanksgiving. >> today was a fabous day. anchor: dimasi willave served five of his 8 year sentence when he leaves prison next tuesday. he will be confined to his home at least six months, leaving only for medical visits and religious observances approved by probation. ed: president-elect donald trump is meeting with one of his top critics this weekend mitt abc news reports romney is being considered as secretary of state in the new cabinet. this video is from 2012 when trump endorsed romney's presidential run. but the president-elect changed his tune this year, repeatedly calling romney a loser. the former massachusetts governor was outspoken throughout this election about his oppos

>> i think we need to know what happened at doj and the fbi. think there are a lot of things that have to happen. i see these things happen like senator paul coming out and saying ambassador bolton could never be secretary of state, and i think to myself, that's just nuts. ambassador bolton would make a great secretary of state, and everybody has to sit back and give this president-elect a chance to name his team. as you said in the last segment with kelly, you got mitt romney coming out to the golf course today, and he had nikki haley, and he talked to tom cotton, and this is obviously a man who move from a campaign that was controversial and bruising to governing with lightning speed, and the last week they were talking about the transition being in chaos, and if you look at the matrix much appointments, donald trump is so far ahead where obama was at the same point in his transition, and people ought to sit back and say, wow, donald trump may be quite a different dish and we could grow to like this very, very much. >> yeah, wow, mitt romney