donald trump syndrome. for the country to move forward, we must come forward and move forward rather than backwards. how do you think donald trump would respond to my theory? guest: you know. he is not about coming together. that does not work for him. he had opportunities. because he is so ideologically flexible, there was hope that he could read someone to work across lines. he was a democrat and a republican. he is from new york. he is not a super hard-core conservative. you could not operate in new york that way. therefore, he could be the guy who brought a party together. that is not what he chose to do. he chose to go right because that was the people who stood with him. his view is come i'm going to stick with the people who stuck with me. he did not believe in working with democrats. the trick is, he is never going to be that kind of politician. maybe not any politician can do that in today's era. he talked about times where he has seen divisiveness where people did not like him. he is not out there

donald trump syndrome. for the country to move forward, we must come forward and move forward rather than backwards. how do you think donald trump would respond to my theory? guest: you know. he is not about coming together. that does not work for him. he had opportunities. because he is so ideologically flexible, there was hope that he could read someone to work across lines. he was a democrat and a republican. he is from new york. he is not a super hard-core conservative. you could not operate in new york that way. therefore, he could be the guy who brought a party together. that is not what he chose to do. he chose to go right because that was the people who stood with him. his view is come i'm going to stick with the people who stuck with me. he did not believe in working with democrats. the trick is, he is never going to be that kind of politician. maybe not any politician can do that in today's era. he talked about times where he has seen divisiveness where people did not like him. he is not out there

the washington post is reporting that donald trump told the trump employee to move the boxes after donald trump received a subpoena from the federal government for those boxes. the fact the donald trump ordered the movement of those boxes after he received a subpoena could be proof beyond a reasonable doubt of donald trump's intention to commit obstruction of justice. it gets worse. the washington post is reporting that there are multiple witnesses, multiple witness accounts, about donald trump ordering the boxes moved after receiving the subpoena in may. the people familiar with the investigations that agents have gathered witness accounts indicating that, after trump advisers received a subpoena in may for any classified documents remained at mar-a-lago, trump told people to move is boxes to his residents at the property. and it gets worse. it's all on video. that description of events was corroborated by the security camera footage, which showed people moving the boxes. after the fbi and federal prosecutor visited trump residents on june 3rd, armed with a subpoena and, and obtain those

to prosecute donald trump? the fact that he is out there lying to the american people about the way that these things work? >> absolutely. it is notable that he continues to make that statement about planting that he has refused to make that statement in the court of law, and before judge cannon, or just theory, or in the 11th circuit. he has not said any of that. why? there are criminal sanctions for those lying in court. he's decided wisely to only make these false statements in public. i would say that also, any person with any sort of logical brain would think, okay, it can't be both planted and they are mine. he can't say that those documents should be returned, if they are planted. also, if you are going to plant documents, you would think that the fbi would plant documents that are not so sensitive that they would never be able to be used in a criminal case. in other words, you're not going to plant top secret part compartmented information where the main issue has been -- and i probably know from my ent

with donald trump. >> mr. to see you? >> but with fox it's qualitatively different. for rupert fox news is also a tool of influence. >> donald trump speaking to supporters in florida yesterday and betting on a big victory in the sunshine state. >> for rupert murdoch, one thing that he cares about is winning elections. ♪ to see someone like you ♪ ♪ but you gotta make your own kind of music ♪ life gets bigger when you break from the herd. ♪ sing your own special song ♪ the volkswagen tiguan. ♪ make your own kind of music ♪ this is remington. he's a member of the family, for sure. we always fed him kibble it just seemed like the thing to do. but he was getting picky, and we started noticing some allergy symptoms. we heard about the farmer's dog and it was a complete transformation. his allergies were going away and he just had amazing energy. it's a no-brainer that remi should have the best nutritious and delicious food possible. i'm investing in my dog's health and happiness. ♪ get started at longlivedogs.com th

they must show that donald trump was told that the voter fraud numbers that donald trump and his lawyers used in a state lawsuit in georgia, were wrong! judge carter explains what happens next. president trump and his attorneys then decided to contest the state court proceeding in federal court, and discuss incorporating by reference the border fraud numbers alleged in the states petition. on december 30th, 2020, dr. eastman relayed concerns from president trump's team about including specific numbers in the paragraph dealing with felons, deceased, moved, et cetera. the attorneys continued to discuss the president's resistance to signing when specific numbers were included. as dr. eastman explains the next day, although the president signed a verification for the state court filing, back on december 1st, he has since been made aware that some of the allegations and evidence proffered by the experts, has been inaccurate. for him to sign a new verification with that knowledge, and incorporation by reference, would not be accurate. president trump and his attorneys ultimately filed the comp

the national archives about the donald documents donald trump was keeping in florida. cash patel was quoted in the fbi affidavit that was used to obtain the search warrant of trump's documents. saying it made that trump had declassified documents. he kept at his residence in florida. what did you say about that when he was asked about it in the grand jury in washington last week? cash patel might have taken the fifth amendment and refused to answer any questions undergrowth to that grand jury, or kash patel may have decided it was time to save himself and stop lying for donald trump. donald trump's lawyers have no idea what he told the grand jury. donald trump and his lawyers have no idea what cash patel told that granary. nothing prevents cash patel from telling them what he told the grand jury. but donald trump's problem is he is a pathological liar who has attracted into his employ other pathetic pathological liars, like kash patel. what so, when one of his pathological liars is now telling him what he said to a grand jury, how can donald trump believe that? how can

i'm running. >> the fact is no one invented donald trump other than donald trump.k post. >> we need trump now! >> you're right. >> over the course of four decades, donald trump appeared more than 110 times on the cover of the new york post. >> donald trump was tabloid gold. i don't think that murdoch and trump were friends, but murdoch certainly saw the advantage in using trump. he could see that trump would sell papers. and trump used "the post" the same way. >> donald trump used to call page six almost every day. all of those trump stories that we were writing is how he could go to the bank and continue to get loans the next morning. i'm serious. >> most americans knew donald trump through his popular reality television show, "the apprentice." >> maria, you're fired. you're fired. you're all fired. all four are fired. >> and in fact, some people would say that nbc launching the show in 2004 is what enabled trump to become a national star. >> donald trump is ceo of the trump organization, and he joins us now bright and early on a monday morning on the phone. >> yo

and that was donald trump.l ever raise his hand and swear to tell the truth in front of the united states congress. . -- i don't think he's capable of telling the truth, that's probably why he will never do. such an important point, michael beschloss, -- that was bipartisan group in there and there were more chuck grassley wasn't, there he doesn't show up in the frame. and not a with of disagreement. they all wanted to get back into the capital and get this done as soon as possible. that was their mission as they were in that room together. in complete agreement every night. >> [inaudible] >> okay, i couldn't hear. senator mccaskill, i couldn't hear michael beschloss on, turns out no one could. but the point that you have made is so important, i just wanna stress it. that was absolutely unanimous. no one there was saying that mcconnell, none of the republicans were saying that. not kevin mccarthy. when we slow down and go home and come back in a couple of days. no one was saying that. >> talking to my friends t

that would be a nightmare for donald trump! to me, the big issue is actually the washington post reporting. when barb and i were at the department, we used to prosecute senior executives. the normal defense for a senior executive is -- i don't get involved in details! whatever was happening below me, i didn't know about. so of course i would have put a stop to that! and the issue here is that if there are witnesses to say that donald trump personally was personally loading the documents, personally returning some but not all, personally importuning council to issue a false certification, where it is clear, alex cannon is basically the don mcgahn of the mar-a-lago case, since the same thing happened -- i mean that is really devastating evidence and undercuts any sort of defense of lack of knowledge, or reliance on other people. and puts him squarely at the center. so yes, it is a misstep to have said what they said in the filing, it's completely opposite, saying that the documents are planted. [laughs] if they never were than in

donald trump just sort of talked . not surprisingly, a lot of what he said was complaints about 2020 along with insoles up just about every single person we asked about -- insults about every single person we asked about. host: guest: it is an interesting question. donald trump was not very quotable in the interview that he is reprising grievances that he said many times. he is a believer in marketing and the power of repetition. he seemed to believe that the more he said something, even if it is untrue, the more effective that is for him. as a author, i said it is valuable for us to see the subject in action and taking insight in the way. i think the main take away is that, he is trying to sell us and also the american people on a series of lies by repeating them over and over again. host: when you did the interview, did he know the title of the book? guest: now, we did not decide it. we decided it a few months before we turned it in. i think he knew we were authors. i think he understood we were independent journalis

no problem give me d date donald. i promise you.ut any amount of money you want he'll never show up because donald trump lies like you breed. >> let me ask you about something you set back. you are one of the first people that said you did not think donald trump would actually concede the election. -- >> a man if i can stop you for a second i was the first person. >> let me play for you this could back from 2019. watch. >> given my experience working for mr. trump, i fear that if he loses the election in 2020, that there will never be a peaceful transition of power. >> what is your fear if donald trump is not punished for refusing to peacefully transfer power in this country? >> i talk about this in my book, revenge. basically what he does is developed a roadmap on how he wants to get to the end result. we have seen that no. when he refused to acknowledge that the election was over that he had lost the election the same way that he knew that i was going to be providing information to the government against him. so from early on his

take donald trump out of it. agreed to his request for a special master, and donald trump got doj to agree to his pick for special master, and that went very badly for donald trump, so here we go. let me read to it. to the honorable clarence thomas, circuit justice for the 11th circuit. pursuant to rules 22 and 23 president trump respectfully applies to vae kate the order issued by the u.s. court of appeals for the 11th circuit. to carol's point, even though that order was not jurisdictionally before the court. what is he talking snabt. >> well, i wouldn't read too much into the fact that this has gone to justice thomas. he is our circuit justice in the 11th circuit. these sorts of matters go to him initially. i would expect that unless he decides to dispense of this on his own, that he will take it to the full court and it won't be a decision made just by justice thomas. if i could for a second, i'll just respond to carol's comment. i think she may be sorry that she asked what i thought about the technical legal

>> well, ask donald trump. >> ask donald trump.ing to fight this subpoena out in court. and jake, as you and the other panelists have noted, donald trump's constant strategy is to delay, delay, delay. we don't expect it to be any different when it comes to this. we did hear from committee members, they really think donald trump should come up here and clear his name. jake? >> all right, sara murray, thank you so much. we are joined by a member of the january 6th select committee, the one that sara described as wishy-washy on whether they were going fight this, jamie raskin, democrat of maryland. how much of this is setting a marker we're inviting him to tell his story, we're inviting him to give his side, and how much of this is no, we really think that we can get him to testify? >> oh, more than a thousand americans have come forward to testify. >> i know. >> including lots of people in his administration, cabinet officials. there have been -- >> of course he should. of course he should. i'm not disputing that. he is not going to.

donald trump knew he lost. despite this knowledge, donald trump went to court to contest the 2020 election and lost in court. the electoral college met and declared joe biden the winner, yet, donald trump continued to pull out all of the stops in his attempt to stay in power. what donald trump proceeded to do after the 2020 election is something no president has done before in our country. in a staggering betrayal of his oath, donald trump attempted a plan that led to an attack on a pillar of our democracy. it is still hard to believe. the facts and testimonies are clear, consistent, and undisputed. how do we know this? how have we been able to put -- present such a clear picture of what took place? because of the testimony we have heard and that we have had presented to you through these proceedings. because of the documentary evidence we have gathered. and also, made available directly to you, the american people. when you look back at what has come out through this committees work, the most striking fact is

on election night donald trumps i on election night donald trumps advisers — on election night donalda factual— advisers specifically told him he didn't have a factual basis - advisers specifically told him he didn't have a factual basis to . didn't have a factual basis to declare _ didn't have a factual basis to declare victory, _ didn't have a factual basis to declare victory, he _ didn't have a factual basis to declare victory, he should i didn't have a factual basis to . declare victory, he should wait didn't have a factual basis to - declare victory, he should wait for the remaining _ declare victory, he should wait for the remaining balance _ declare victory, he should wait for the remaining balance to - declare victory, he should wait for the remaining balance to be - declare victory, he should wait for. the remaining balance to be counted. here is _ the remaining balance to be counted. here is campaign— the remaining balance to be counted. here is campaign manager. _ the remaining balance to be counted. here is campaign manager. it- the remaining balance to be counted. here is

the scary thing that i want to say about donald trump is i wish our problem was just donald trump now ron desaints we can go through the line, the governor that's running in arizona. >> kari lake. >> the governor that's running in pennsylvania. >> mastriano. >> these are people who are even more dangerous because they present themselves in better packaging and better clothes. donald trump, it's easy if you're on the other side, look at craze guy, the hair, and the ridiculous things and now we have ivy educated he was ivy educated. ivy league types, if you will, and the scary thing right now is because donald trump will go down in history as a villain as he is what's to come, and i think it's on the table in the next few weeks whereas is this what the country wants. we keep making it about donald trump and i keep seeing these candidates winning and going, wait a send and when i see a stat that says up out of three people in this country, either pew or axios that would rather have a strong effective unelected leader than a less effective elected leader and that democracy right now is ba

thursday, conclusion of a subpoena to donald trump. >> we have no doubt that donald trump led an efforteen american democracy that directly resulted in the violence of january 6. he tried to take away the voice of the american people in choosing their president and replace the will of the voters with his will to remain in power. he is the one person at the center of the story of what happened on january 6, so we want to hear from him. the committee needs to do everything in our power to tell the most complete story possible and provide recommendations to help ensure nothing like january 6 ever happens again. we need to be fair and thorough and gain a full context for the evidence we've obtained. but the need for this committee to hear from donald trump goes beyond our fact finding. this is a question about accountability to the american people. he must be accountable. he is required to answer for his actions. he's required to answer to those police officers who put their lives and bodies on the line to defend our democracy. he's required to answer to those millions of americans who vote

"— list of witch-hunts against donald trump." 0k. peter, for the moment. _ donald trump." 0k. - donald trump." 0k. peter, for the moment, thank you very i the moment, thank you very much. peter bowe5, america correspondent. archaeologists have discovered ancient rock carving5 at the city of mosul�*s monumental mashki gate, a site the islamic state group tried to destroy in 2016. they include 2700—year—old works, depicting scenes from the ancient city of nineveh. tom brada reports. in early 2016, the city of mosul in iraq was under control mo5ul in iraq was under control of the islamic state group. nis took over major cities its militants would often lay wa5te militants would often lay waste to cultural trea5ures they came across and with target ancient artefact5 with impunity. that was the case with the mashki gate in mosul. this is what it wants look like. it was one of the monumental gates to the ancient assyrian city of nineveh which was at one point the largest city in the world. mo5ul wa5 the largest city in the world. mo5ul was effectively bulldozed by the islamic state,

the january 6th committee has subpoenaed donald trump today. using its final hearing to make this historic move, which paves a path to the first ever clash between donald trump and the congress over whether he will show up, speak under oath, tell the truth. that's our top story. tonight we will also be covering other breaking news coming out of the supreme court this afternoon. the supreme court rejecting donald trump's filing in that mar-a-lago stolen documents case. this ruling rebuffs trump's attempt to try to slow down any review of the classified documents, which the government says he stole, and this came out with no dissents, meaning no justice siding with or on behalf of donald trump's position nor his effort to involve the high court in what would be a standard review of stolen stuff. later tonight we'll report on this newly revealed footage from inside the congress in safe zones, bunkers and other rooms where congressional leaders were in hiding as trump fans launched their attacks during the insurrection. the fear was palpable. speak

and the outcome that one rider predicts for donald trump. then, elon musk keeps the world guessing with the twitter saga. and now, he is denying reports you talk to vladimir putin about the war in ukraine. plus, one month until the election. meet a woman who left her a big job on capitol hill to be a political social media influencer. she is showing voters what they need to know. she has come to the right place, as the 11th hour gets underway on this tuesday night. good evening. once again, i am thrilled to be with you. i am stephanie ruhle. the doj's message to the supreme court today, reject donald trump's appeal asking for an emergency assist in the mar-a-lago documents case. late today, the justice department responded to trump's bid to get the high court involved in the fight over classified documents recovered from his florida club. one former prosecutor explained exactly what trump's legal advisers are trying to get done here. >> it looks like the trump folks want to get the classified documents included back within the group of docum

so it is oatio to seek donald trump's testimony. there's precedent in american history, for congress to compel the testimony of a president. there's also precedent for presidents to provide testimony and documentary evidence to congressional investigators. we also recognize that a subpoena to a former president is a serious and extraordinary action. that's why we want to take this step in full view of the american people, especially because the subject matter at issue is so important to the american people, and the stakes are so high, for our future and our democracy. and so i recognize the vice chair, ms. cheney of wyoming to offer a motion. >> mr. chairman, pursuant to today's notice, i send to the desk a committee resolution and ask for its immediate consideration. >> the clerk will report the resolution. >> committee resolution 1. resolved, that the chairman be and is hereby directed to subpoena donald j. trump for documents and testimony in connection with the january 6th attack on the unid ste pursuant to section 5 c 4 of hous

and the thing i know about donald trump is there's sort of two donald trumps. there's the behind the scenes guy who knows what the deal is. right? who knows he lost the election. and then there's the public face of donald trump that he hides behind the trappings of wealth and, you know, having ex-police officers around him and secret service and the flag and all these kind of things he uses to intimidate others. and his world is crumbling now. i think yesterday was one of his worst nightmares because people were seeing that he knew he lost, and they were also seeing nancy pelosi showing real leadership. so i don't think there's anything in it for donald trump to testify. and i think ultimately he's a coward. >> and he's already been exposed now as not being a billionaire, not being as rich as he said. that's clear. he's been exposed as clearly a derelict president, somebody who didn't know how to do the job and was incapable of doing the job, and who also led an attack on the united states. can you get inside, you know, donald trump wanting to stay president fo

the way donald trump does.were all silent, remained silent, as kanye, he said he is going to go death count three on the juice, not only that, he hasn't stopped. this is one day after the interview. he's ramped opposite rhetoric. yesterday, he pops on a podcast, where he rents about shows control of the media, arguing that juice control every industry and use it to explode others while calling disney a, quote, jewish platform, and blaming joe sinus for spreading stories about his ex-wife compression, and her ex boyfriend keep davidson. textbook stops, folks. we the book. there is a reason why the people watching with the dickey churches in charlottesville, very fine people that donald trump once described them, claimed were defending their confederate heritage, there's a reason those man you see there were chanting jews will not replace us. and blood and soil. this is not a fluke. it's not like, oh, wow, weird, antisemitism over there, and antisemitism over there. well, popping up a lot. no. the kind of right-w

el comité que investiga el asalto al capitolio, muestra la investigación sobre la complicidad de donaldlo llamaron a testificar, en un video inédito se le ve a nancy pelosi decir que el gustaría golpear a donald trump . >> la vida del asesino confeso de parkland se salvó por uno de los 12 jurados que sentenció a nikolas cruz a la pena de muerte, esto se recibió con decepción por los familiares . >> el sistema nuevamente consigue formas de defraudarme , 5 muertos y horas de tensión sembró este adolescente en carolina del norte , y la inflación sube por los cielos, enfrentamos el índice más alto en los últimos 40 años, le mostraremos cuánto suben los precios de alimentos los últimos años . >> muy buenas noches bienvenidos a esta emición, comenzamos con este video que fue mostrado hoy por el comité que investiga el asalto al capitolio vemos como nancy pelosia muestra la propietario de la madre de schummer,. >> que ambos le exigían al fiscal interino que detuviera a la turba . >> (habla en inglés) . >> (información en pantalla) . >> (información en pantalla) . >> esa fue solamente una de la

and donald trump says to ohio voters that j. d.ou know -- he says that publicly about the candidate that he picked to run in ohio. and j. d. vance just takes it. i've never seen anything like that in a senate candidate before. >> thought ted cruz was the biggest you know what kisser in politics but it's clearly j. d. vance. i don't know anybody i grew up with lawrence in ohio that wouldn't be that humiliated in front of the entire world, call and ask kisser and then ten minutes later and get up on stage and grip his hand with the guy who just humiliated you. that's not how ohioans are built. we won an ass kicker from ohio, and that's what i'm gonna do. and look, we are building a grassroots effort, because people can smell the phoniness from the sky. he's got 350,000 low donors. we got this guy in a run. he won't even be seen in ohio. he's afraid to meet with people, but one because he's lazy, but he also knows he's so extremely can't connect with ohio voters. so we are going all over the state. he's not anywhere. he's even afraid

allies and advisors, donald trump knew he lost. despite this knowledge, donald trump went to court to contest the 2020 election and he lost in court. electoral college met and declared joe biden the winner yet donald trump continued to pull out all the stops in his attempt to stay in power. what donald trump proceeded to do after the 2020 election is something no president has done before in our country. in a staggering betrayal of his oath, donald trump attempted a plan that led to an attack on a pillar of our democracy. it's still hard to believe. but the facts and testimony are clear, consistent and undisputed. how do we know this? how have we been able to present such a clear picture of what took place? because of the testimony we have heard and that we have had presented to you through these proceedings, because of the documentary evidence we have gathered, and also made available directly to you, the american people. when you look back at what has come out through this committee's work, the most striking fact is that all this

to donald trump. so we saw what the january 6th committee has. but we don't know what these cooperating witnesses have told the department of justice. i mean, it's very likely that these people have a lot more knowledge about donald trump and exactly what his role was and what roger stone's role was as a conduit to donald trump. we have some tat bits out there from testimony from the summer with cassidy hutchinson saying that mark meadows had called roger stone the night before. but we don't -- there was no evidence today that really tied that together in a substantive way, but i think the department of justice may very well have that evidence. >> you know, the thing is, charles, this goes back, in the summer of 2020, donald trump was way down in the polls. the summer of 2020 is when he did his hold the bible upside down and tear gas a bunch of protesters in order to get there. he was sinking in the polls. it was clear to anyone who was following the campaign at that point he was in trouble. the covid

but it's just donald being donald. we have to stop this nonsense about donald just being donald.resent danger to this country, to our democracy. and if we don't put a stop to it, like, now -- not tomorrow, i mean now -- we may never see democracy again. this could seriously be gilead. i know it's a great show and, you know, you think to yourself, this could never happen. i disagree. >> i mean, i've heard this recently from a very small number of people, very informed, that say we could look back in a couple years and you want to be able to answer the question, did you do everything you can? only a handful of people are going to be able to say you have. you have with your appearances and your book. >> i appreciate that, but if we're not successful -- >> doesn't matter, doesn't matter. >> -- it doesn't mean anything. >> exactly. i'm going to ask you to stick around. i'm going to add neal katyal to our conversation. >>> later in the hour, the current occupant of the white house, president joe biden, is on the campaign trail selling his economic achievements. white house chief of sta

and it was donald trump's and it is donald trump's refusal just to accept the normal workings of democracye crisis he unleashed on the country. is there anybody anymore who believes that if donald trump had just accepted what more than 60 courts told him, which is that there was no electoral fraud, there was no electoral corruption, does anybody believe if he had just conceded defeat the way that every other president in american history has done, that any of this would have happened. and of course it would not have. it all spun out of his pathological determination to stay in office, even though he lost the election by more than 7 million votes, 306-322 in the electoral college. but there are ancillary parts of the story. we have seen the mobilizing of a domestic movement that was empowered by donald trump. we've seen the way that social media was not able to respond effectively to whistle-blowers from within who said there's going to be a bloodbath, there's going to be violence. so these other things have come out and it's our job to put it altogether in a report to the american people b

trump -- i knew donald trump from the '80s and donald trump for a while was involved in boxing, at thend it was almost to me what donald trump, who was the one that suggested herschel said, oh, we have a black senator, throw a black guy in there, herschel, it was almost like that. i don't think they vetted him. >> like he was randomly pick, throwing a dart. >> here's my guy. >> and as he began to become exposed as being all of this that joe just raised, it doesn't matter. we're throwing a black guy in the ring with a black guy. that's how trump thinks. the insults started with trump. what is scary is that people are buying into it. clarence thomas, i disagree with just about everything he's ever uttered, but clarence thomas does have a background and understanding of law, i don't think herschel knows the difference between the house of representatives and the u.s. senate, and the fact that they would throw him in there is an insult to all of us that fought and continue to fight to open doors for blacks. we should be celebrating two black men running against each other with political id

i think hardcore republicans as well as of course the followers of donald trump and fans of donald trump. they have long are classified the hearing and the committee's work. s. s bogus and a hoax. and, and a, you remember which hunt as the former president always called it. i'm so no, it will not have any effect. i'm fairly sure that this is not the case. there are other topics which are more important for the midterms here. that was the w correspondence, stephanie simon's speaking to me earlier. let's take a look at some other stories making headlines around the world. us jury has refused to sentence a florida school shooter to death. despite please from the families of his victims . nicholas cruz was imprisoned for life for murdering 17 students and staff at a high school in parkland. the master guy inspired a wave of gun control activism. turkeys parliament passed controversial media law, which could involve jail time for those thought to be spreading dis information. critics fear this will be used to crack down on democracy and freedom of speech, especially in the run up to collectio

donald. he's going to i want to testify. i want to go before them. i want to make a whole thing out of this. it's not true. we've seen this act before. that's the whole thing. why are we falling for the same nonsense again? and again and again? how many times has this man turn said? 100%. i'm going to cooperate. does he cooperate? no. i want to testify. i want the truth to be told. he takes the fifth 500 times. this is an old story. this is this is the same donald trump that's been doing it since started his practice. and so the answer is, no, he's not going to testify. he's not going to respect the process. he has no respect for any of the nine individuals that are on the committee. you know, whether it's adam kinzinger especially or liz cheney, adam schiff, he has no respect for any of them. so the answer is he will not. as far as what would i tell him to do if i was his attorney? well, morocco, i believe namibia, these are countries that have no extradite dition. and so he should get on hi

or whether they want to go with donald trump again and bring him back or move on from donald trump and have someone who is going to carry on donald trump's policies without the political baggage.january 6th committee is not a factor in those decisions. it's who can win the election and whether there's somebody else that can pick up that mantel. that is a conversation for another day. we are one month away from an election where congress is being decided. we're going to find out whether or not there's any check on the reckless spending and all of the other radical policies that are happening. we just found out today that grocery prices went up 18%, gas line prices have gone up 50%. natural gal prices are up. cars are up, furniture is up. the worst inflation in four decades, the worst crime wave since the 90s, the worst border crisis in american history. most americans say i don't care about donald trump. i care about what is happening in my life. i care about the fact that i have to choose between gas and food. i have to choose between paying my rent and heating my home this winter. thi

what is your reaction to what donald trump had to say?, what he said was something very peculiar, which is -- meaning american jews, had better appreciate israel before it's too late. is that a threat? is that an invitation to leave. what i do know is it's antics medic, and a revives all of the tropes but donald trump has used again and again during his presidency, to intimate that jews are loyal to israel rather than united states, and that there is somehow letting down israel, or letting down the jewish people by not supporting him, who he contends is the real friend of the jewish people. it's all very unsightly and unseemly, and as you point out, it comes in a party in which kanye west has been thrown off social media. we've seen even the, soon to be, i suppose, if you're not careful, speaker of the house, and kevin mccarthy make a very gross -- donor, rather, and intimate in again that jews control money, cruise control politics. this is unseemly stuff, and it is entirely condoned in the republican party. there was a time not too long

he sent a link to the page on the donald. wynn. the linked webpage had comments about the joint session of congress on january 6. take a look at some of the comments. gallows don't require electricity. if the filthy commie maggots try to push their fraud through, there will be hell to pay. our lawmakers of congress can leave one of two ways, one, and a body bag, too, after rightfully certifying trump the winner. mr. miller claimed that he had no idea about the hundreds of comments like these in the link that he sent to mark meadows. [video clip] >> if i had seen something like that i probably would've sent it to someone at the white house. i would've said we would like this for secret service or something of that nature. [end of video clip] >> the trump administration was aware of this type of violent rhetoric prior to january 6. as we have seen, the secret service and other agencies knew the prospect of violence well in advance of the president speech at the ellipse. despite this, certain white house and secret service witnesses p

donald trump knew he was pressuring the vice president.s lying. he was trying to basically change out the doj to be people sympathetic to him to give at least the airfare complicity an changing election results. and he knew when he was sitting in the office during the attack on january 6 that there is a chance for richard succeed. what do you want americans to take away from the hearings tha you've held so far. i want the american people to look at these hearings and understand how close we came that day to losing that self-governance. freedom isn't free. you have to defend this, and no just overseas, sometimes here a home there's no changing usa] >> do you miss me yet? pees in the aftermath jerry sister and his election loss: >>> anthony zarski that another beauty. donald trump made it his missio to root out everyone in the republican party who has oppose him. jordan cavaco, devon bell dale pees of the ten republicans in the house of representatives voted to impeach him, only two remain. >> get rid of them all. >> the others have declined

what is your reaction to what donald trump had to say?you showed in that in that screenshot, screenshot, what he said was something very what he said was something very peculiar, peculiar, which was we had better, which is meaning american -- meaning american jews, had better jews we had better appreciate appreciate israel israel before it's too late. before it is too late. is that is that a threat? a threat? is is that that an an invitation to invitation to leave? leave what i do. what i know is do know is it's it's antics medic, antisemitic and it and a revives revives all of the all of the tropes trumps that donald trump is used again and again during his presidency to intimate that jews aren't loyal to israel rather than to the united states and that they are somehow somehow letting down letting down israel israel or letting, or letting down the down the jewish people by jewish people but not not supporting him, supporting him who he who he contends is contends is the real the real friend of the jewish friend of the people. jewish peo