there was an intimate conference with dph. -- there was an abatement conference with dph. another meeting. the owners had an opportunity to explain or to develop whatever their concerns were, the difficulties were, with respect to operating. i understand that the owners in this case would like to be able to have their patrons smoke. however, the health code expressly prohibits that. what complicates matters further, the smoking is taking place in a mixed use building. there is residential space immediately above the premises, and there are a number of tenants in that building that have complained to the department of public health regarding second-hand smoke, and they are present. there are representatives of dph that can speak to specific complaints, but it is my understanding that residents of the way up to the 10th floor have talked about the secondhand smoke. commissioner fung: are we listening for a case for a continuance? we did not approach this as a case, right? director goldstein: we did. we just called it out of order. commissioner fung: we did proved so we are h

dph is involved with both permitting processes. but for private property, they get the -- they have to do deferral to the planning department stating that through the planning department process, the truck has authorization. for dpw, they are the final permit operator, but the operator has to show that they have their dph permit. commissioner adams: i like when they have the food trucks at golden gate park or civic center plaza. those are great and wonderful. i am hearing negativity about down at fisherman's wharf, castro, other neighborhoods. there seems to be no public input on whether the private or public space and i would like to address that. >> i will be happy to -- we might want to get this through the permitting committee. there is public input definitely on the public property. there is mailing and noticing that is new to this permitting process. president o'brien: members of the public can participate and sit in on the permitting committee's meeting and listen to presentations. that is pretty important. i think we should

supervisor kim: why did we not previously designated with dph? >> i believe it was a decision made by the board of supervisors at the time. there is no money in the fund at this point. supervisor kim: thank you. i know there are other departments here as well. would anybody else like to add anything? >> good morning. i am from the treasurer's office. i just wanted to state our support and our partnership in this program, and we look forward to rolling out the porthole in mid-october, along with the property tax bills, which since 1984 has been the time that folks can see the voluntary proposition to the program. that will be our big role in, and it will be able to go from the property tax payment website on to being able to donate for this. supervisor chu: all right, thank you. why don't we go to public comment. any members of the public wished to speak on this item? item number four. seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can take the amendment as articulated by the recreation and parks department, simply to clarify programs and facilities

. -- dph would no more. >> to the extent that someone has to be in that area, who turns it off? -- supervisor campos: to the extent that someone has to be in that area, who turns and off? that is one of the things that i find frustrating. it is not entirely clear what the process is, and i think it is helpful for us to have a very clear picture of how that works. i know that there the issues before us that are very narrow in nature, but at the very same time, we need to have a sense of the mechanism that is followed, and if it is something that is followed, it should be easy to provide that information. >> would you like me to describe this to the best of my knowledge? supervisor campos: it is up to you if you think that is responsive. >> we go over the report with the planning department and make sure there is a review of the existing emissions, and then we make sure that it would comply with the fcc regulations. we also go for aesthetic review. dph, as part of their review, they do a health report showing the projected output as well as the existing cumulative rf levels and mo

dph, jcpp, and jpf me monthly with all of our providers. it allows us to see whether the expectations, requirements, and policies are actually aligned with what our front line workers are doing. there's a continuous feedback loop, which is very helpful. supervisor campos: if i may say -- and we have a lot of other things to cover, but i simply want to say that i look forward to continuing to work with all departments. i think it is one of the things that we should do, and we're trying to set up a community meeting in the next few days, and we want to make sure that others in the community know what we're doing. what i have heard from many folks in my neighborhood is we hear what is happening from reading the chronicle or the examiner, and it is always on something that happens, but there's not enough information about all the positive things and pro-active things that are being done. i think we can all play a role in making that happen. thank you again, and i look forward to continuing to work with you. supervisor mirkarimi: if it is ok, wh

i believe we have a dph representative here if you have specific questions about the program. supervisor chu: thank you. let's move to the budget analyst report on this item. >> as stated by mr. updike and john on the top of page four of our report, -- and shown on at the top of page four, approval would result in the first year rental reduction of 26,500 devaney $7 -- $26,877. on the bottom of page 8 of the report is the total cost of the proposed lease over the five years ranges from 707,896 to $750,624. that does not include some installation costs of $16,450. we recommend you approve this resolution. supervisor chu: thank you very much. let's open this up for public comment. any members of the public wish to speak on item number eight? seeing none, public comment is closed. to the item, can we move this forward with recommendations? we can do that without objection. thank you. do we have any other items before us? >> that completes the agenda. supervisor chu: thank you. we are adjourned. if you would like to make general public comment on an item that is not on calendar, t

dph plays a strong role in helping build adult probation and helping the sheriff's department. yes, absolutely. supervisor cohen: thank you. supervisor mirkarimi:sorry, i did not mean to give you to match information. >> yes, the department of health has been actively involved. a portion of the state funding is going to dph to provide very important services for these offenders coming up. just to put a point on that, the pre-release packets that were now receiving -- we have about 30 people, 30 packets, 30 individuals we know are coming out in the next month. five of those have been identified as having severe mental health issues. and we're already working very closely with crag murdoch and his staff, so there is a cooperative effort to do an assessment of those individuals before they come out and to identify the type of services and prepare for placement of those individuals before they are released to community supervision. supervisor mirkarimi: thank you. i greatly appreciate. hello to the chief, yes. any public comment? ok. we have fans. public comment is closed. colleagu

and work with dph on the initial amendment. but also put out rfp's and rfq's for new services. and we know that we're going to be receiving additional dollars related to sb 678. it is not one-time money or one- time contract in. supervisor chu: supervisor mirkarimi. supervisor mirkarimi: please continue. >> there are two separations of workload. one is really the policies and updating the plan and all of the administrative work that goes along and the analytical work. the other is getting all these services in place and to bring the contract performance measurements in place and holding the vendors accountable to those measures. and then the original two positions will continue to do what they have been doing, supervising and administering the reentry council, the executive director over that, and also staffing all the committees. those 40 depositions that came to us with a full workload. -- those are two positions the cantu as with a full workload. when i got the original request, i wanted additional administrative with negotiations to the budget process. basically we went dow

president to uphold this 30- suspension on the basis of the health code violation, as listed in the dph order. commissioner hwang: aye. commissioner fung: aye. >> the 30-day suspension is upheld on that basis. >> now we will go back to the regular calendar. >> we move to item 5a, a jurisdiction request. 23 belmont ave. it received a letter from susan scannon, asking of the board take jurisdiction over the electrical permit, which was issued on march 8, 2011. the appeal period ended on march 23, 2011. the jurisdiction request was received on july 19, 2011. the permit-holders is chanter- cheung revoke will trust. we will start with the request or. >> i am the representative. this is in response to 23 belmont avenue. the homeowner i am representing lives around the corner at 176 edgewood ave. she would like to reopen the appeal process during which -- chiefly, the reason she was never notified. under the present permit application for solar panels, there is no neighborhood notification, as there is in any other exterior alterations to a building, and significantly in a historic district an

the agreement between the dph in san francisco health authority for these services include, it was in 2008. as we state on page 6 of the report, you can see that the request for the proposal is not appropriate for this agreement as they provide third-party administration in a second agreement for the entire health the san francisco program. providing services as an efficient, we agreed that it would be inefficient. as pointed out, this agreement would be retroactive for the reasons stated on pages six and seven of the report. we recommend approval of this resolution. supervisor chu: are there any members of the public that wish to comment on item number four? >> please give to the program. ♪ for your healthy heart for your breath as you grow old you know your health you know is the measurable feeling good is immense so give it dollars and cents do it for your healthy heart and your health the sole and for your blessings you grow when it tilts to give money to some ♪ supervisor chu: thank you. are there other members of the public it wished to speak on this item? can we -- seeing no on

. -- dph. >> i am the manager of the intensive supervision and clinical services program, which has benefited from the local action plan partnership. it is a great example of what our cross agency partnerships look like on the ground. in 2010-2011, intense community- based services were provided by five agencies and a program psychiatrist, funded by a blend of violence prevention initiative dollars and state metical dollars. services were provided city wide to over 250 juvenile justice involved youth with serious behavioral problems and high risk. as you know, nationwide, over as you know, nationwide, over 70% of youth involved in the

as the commissioner of dph, you may be able to explain some of the health impacts and the laws that govern this whole thing. he is sitting back there. before you leave, you should exchange information. commissioner antonini. >commissioner antonini: move to approve. >> thank you. >> motion for approval. commissioner antonini. >> yes. >> commissioner fong:. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. president olague. >> thank you. but these are approved. if you're standing by the door, if you could find a seat in the room, we would appreciate it. if there are no seats, if you could stand on the opposite side of the room so that you do not create a hazard in case of an emergency. thank you. commissioners, we now go back to item number 12, case number 2008.0877itzm. it is an informational presentation. >> i will take a moment to introduce jim, who will start the presentation on the western so much community plan. as you know, he has been chairing the citizens task force for a number of years and has been working with that task force on this plan for a long time. we're getting closer at the depar

. -- dph. >> i am the manager of the intensive supervision and clinical services program, which has benefited from the local action plan partnership. it is a great example of what our cross agency partnerships look like on the ground. in 2010-2011, intense community- based services were provided by five agencies and a program psychiatrist, funded by a blend of violence prevention initiative dollars and state metical dollars. services were provided city wide to over 250 juvenile justice involved youth with serious behavioral problems and high risk. as you know, nationwide, over 70% of youth involved in the juvenile justice system have mental health needs. another of 25% have serious mental health needs. iscs is designed to serve those youth. the majority of the youth in our program have been exposed to repeated community buviolence. at least have have symptoms of ptsd, which can contribute to the kinds of behaviors that get them into trouble and involved in the system. ifcs is more effective than just supervision alone. combines monitoring of the structure of intensive supervision with an arra