what judge cavanagh's leaked emails say about that when we return.ilding something completely different. capital one cafés. welcoming places with people here to help you, not sell you. with savings and checking accounts with no fees or minimums. that are easy to open from right here or anywhere in 5 minutes. no smoke. no mirrors. this is banking reimagined. what's in your wallet? ♪ >> shannon: democratic senator makes some corrections on key figures on abortion. that and >> democratic senator makes corrections on key figures on abortion in the brett kavanaugh by the numbers. >> protests were a big story on capitol hill, 70 arrests according to capital police, two categories of protests, those who are in the back and shop and those who dress up, handmaidens from the handmaid's tale and this man who made a bold statement. are the arrested protesters coming back? between the committee and us counsel, if you get arrested you should becoming a back but many slip in it is not a perfect system. are they being paid to protest? not technically. sometimes peop

alluding to these emails of hillary clinton's email stp? >> so i met john once at the rnc convention. so if there was an email, as john is eluding to, various members of the campaign copied on this, it doesn't matter if i deleted it, they would have had receipts of my email and i don't think that proof has ever been provided. >> so you just think he misremembers? >> i think he misremembered, yeah. >> there are people who are going to think there's no way you didn't tell anyone on the campaign. you didn't tell cory lewandowski? >> i didn't share this with anyone on the campaign. >> deerborn? mashburn? >> anyone. >> none of them? >> i might have but i have no recollection of doing so. can't guarantee it. all i can tell you is my memory says i never shared it with anyone on the campaign. >> but that meeting is the reason that operation cross fire hurricane, the fbi investigation into possible conspiracy between russians and the trump campaign was launched was because of your meeting with hum and him making that offer. >> actually it wasn't an

bush library to clear the emails.er for president book said, quoting, we were surprised to learn about senator booker's histrionics this morning because we had already told him he could use the documents publicly. "wall street journal" reporter byron tower tweeted, quote, i asked cory booker if his remarks in committee or a stunned. he told me i was violating the constitution for being in his way. white house deputy press secretary raj shah called booker's comments "embarrassing." it turns out the emails are not at all. they showed brett kavanaugh was against racial profiling, telling colleagues he favors, quote, effective security measures that are race neutral, which prompted this, quoting brett kavanaugh did not want to racially profile people after 9/11. bravo, spartacus. ben shapiro road, cory brooker , reality, not a single element of this training is true. continuing to release confidential emails, and we are told that some of them have not yet been clear. >> shannon: trace gallagher, thank you very much. earli

i have had these emails, i think.and this one before testifying. >> i am not going to remember, senator. but i do know that that email does refer to what's my impression of what legal scholars think. it was -- >> if you don't remember, whether someone showed it to you or not, i want to move on to another area. you were asked yesterday by senator harris, as to whether you have certain conversations about the special counsel investigation, with anyone outside of the group of judges on the d.c. circuit. at that point, your answer was vague, and it was again this morning, when senator hatch asked you about it. so i want to ask you very specifically, have you discussed the special counsel investigation with anyone outside of the group of judges on the d.c. circuit. >> i have had no inappropriate discussions with anyone. >> have you had any discussions with anyone? appropriate or inappropriate? have you ever talked about the special counsel investigation with anyone outside the -- >> if you are walking around in america, it

what senator would want to release their emails? with all the emails and everything, without redaction of phone numbers? social security numbers? addresses. and social security numbers? that all has to be done. under law. to reduce this. but i think that we have the department of justice cooperating with that. so before this day is over, members will have the documents this they need to ask the questions that they want to ask. now before i ask my questions and one senator wants to make a 30-second comment, i'm well to turn to that. but let me say each of our 21 senators on the committee get to ask questions for 20-minute round. every couple hours we'll take a break. and that would include lunchbreak. and judge, if you need a break at any time, have your staff inform my staff. and as is the standard practice for every judicial nominee, the fbi conducts a background investigation and provides to the senate a background report. moreover, like with prior nominees, including justices kagan and gorsuch, there are a number of presidential

this is an email from kavanaugh on roe v. wade back from 2003.id, i am not sure that all legal scholars refer it roe as settled law of the land at the supreme court level since the court can always overrule its precedent and three current justices on the court would do so. here is brett kavanaugh's response to that email a little bit earlier today. >> in that draft letter it was referring to the views of legal scholars, and i think my comment in the email was that might be overstating the position of legal scholars. so it wasn't a technically accurate description in the letter of what legal scholars thought. >> he has said when it comes to roe that there is precedent on precedent with roe, that multiple cases have come before the supreme court that have reaffirmed roe. given that he has made that statement multiple times, do you think that means it's more likely that he is going to be willing to stand by roe or do you still question his motives? >> i think that he is clear that he will support restrictions on abortion, and i say that not just bec

13th, 2002, emailing obviously taken from my internal emails, what he's going to do.id any of this raise a red flag in your mind? >> it did not, senator, because it all seemed consistent with the usual kinds of discussions that happen. sometimes, people do say things of "here's what my boss is thinking, but don't share it around." i must have had so many conversations in the course of my life like that, where someone is saying like that about something. in other words, trying to give you a heads up on something. that just seems standard, senate, staff. the direct answer to your question is, for example, it looks like biden's staff is asking not to attend the hearing. that wouldn't have raised anything at all for me other than -- >> not where it came from? on june 5th, 2003, received an email from the republican senate staffer with the subject line "spying." that is not overly subtle. this staffer appears in over 1,000 documents we received together with both you and mr. miranda. she says she has a mole for us, and so forth. none of this raised a red flag with you? >>

attacks, there were fears even in emails, al qaeda would attack again.rday the emails were labeled committee confidential. that was removed this morning. the senators were notified about that. still senator booker and senator john cornyn got in heated debate over senator booker saying he would release the confidential emails and possibly face the consequences. >> i just say bring them. if he wants to go through that process, i fully accept responsibility for what i have done. and again, i'm new in this place. this senator has been around for a long time. he is a, in leadership. i think he was just like most bullies are, a lot of talk, no action. so let's see what he does. i'm willing to accept responsibility for my actions. but i don't know what, i don't know what that senior senator will do. reporter: but again, that committee confidential was removed at 4:00 a.m. this morning. senator chuck grassley's spokesperson released a statement saying quote, apparently some just wanted to break the rules and make a scene but didn't check their email. senator gra

he raised an issue with some emails.ime that you did not have the emails in front of you. and i think that is very important for any witness in any proceeding to be given documents. they were prepared some 18 years ago. he was a lawyer have no doubt been involved in the creation of many hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of documents. we have asked you to recall from memory something that you wrote 18 years ago, that is going to be difficult. in any event, these emails deal with an issue involving some questions surrounding supreme court case. so let's refer to a document. as i understand it, you were being asked to provide some advice on what may happen if a particular arguments were presented it to the supreme court on the merits. he looked regulations. as i understand it, correct me if i'm wrong, if i understood it correctly, the government was considering making a series of arguments before the supreme court and you did what a good lawyer should do when advancing an argument to the court. you counted to five. y

and email it email appeared exclusively by this show reveals that a senior google employee dd thee company'sources to increase voter turnout in ways that she believed would help the clinton campaign win in the last election. the email we obtained came fromw a woman named eliana moreno, ths multicultural marketing department. she sent the email on november 9th, 2016, 1 day after the presidential election. that email was subsequently forwarded by terrible google vice president's to more staff members throughout the company. in her email, she touts google's multifaceted efforts to boost hispanic turnout in the election. she notes that the latinos voted in record breaking numbers especially in states like florida, nevada, and arizona. the last of which she describes as "a key state for us." she breaks that the company used its power to ensure that millions of people saw certain hashtags in social media impressions with the goal of influencing their behavior during the election. elsewhere in the email, she says google "supported partners like voter latino to pay for a ride to the polls in key sta

were you on this email list?n't remember anything like that, senator. >> how often did you talk with the judge on the phone? >> not often. not often, sir. >> how often did you see him in person? >> again, not often. maybe when there was a legal convention. >> a lot of people don't seem to understand. >> i was not working -- he was in the pasadena courthouse in california with a small courthouse with 10 other court of appeals judges in that courthouse. i, of course, was working in washington, d.c. >> when you did see and talk with him, what type of things did you talk about? >> we were among the 12 co-authors of the brian garner-led book on judicial precedent. so for several years that was a project all of us -- the 12 of us i guess it was in total were working on that. diane wood, chief judge of the seventh circuit and justice gorsuch was also a co-author. we worked on that as a group. and then justice kennedy for the last 30 years had had the judge run justice kennedy's law clerk hiring process and in the course

small sample of emails that have been released.hink what is wanted is an investigation into perjury for brett kavanaugh, who, by the way, as many may recall, axel he cut his teeth working for ken starr to try to remove president clinton for perjury, for lying under oath about sex. and here we have this man who came before the senate in 2004 and 2006 and was not forthcoming. i think the questions he was asked were very direct about receiving any sort of content that might've indicated there was information being taken from democratic staffers. i would say, amy, the suggestion that there was sharing of information that such confidential information by staff to the republican staff is outlandish. we were united. the democrats worry united in the judiciary -- were united in the judiciary. they were united on the floor to try to protect the courts from those judges. the idea this was normal for him to receive secret democratic talking points and the like is simply false. amy: i want to go to brett kavanaugh -- >> receiving those documen

in it, brett kavanaugh writes an email in which he says that she be racial neutral.seem too controversial? >> i guess i agree that there are politics beyond the supreme court fight itself. probably not just to go people, probably mostly democrats and the u.s. senate think that they ought to be president. i thought it was a peculiar exchange. kind of hard to explain. maybe it didn't rebound as the way that cory booker had hoped. i think this is the new democratic party that we will see from now on. they are demanding a stronger, more disruptive, more aggressive action by the people who want to lead it. we saw that in the primaries. we might see it in the delaware primary tonight. we'll be watching for that. this is the face of the democratic party now. just going to take of the trump administration in a more aggressive way. fight harder even if you don't have any mission. >> brett: here senator booker bowing to release documents. >> they released those documents after i'd already read them. if you look at what i'm doing all day today, i continue to release these docum

"these emails were a brainstorm of ideas, and none ever implemented.gle has never modified search results to promote a political ideology, not in the current campaign season, not during the 2016 election, not in the aftermath of president trump's order on immigration. our processes improperly policies would not have allowed us to nor did google say anything about these employees on this email chain. presume believe they still work at google, which is remarkable. if you ran a bank and you caught your child is brains telling how to rob the vault, will they still work for you? google fired a engineer named james damar, flew back to fire him, wipe like that because he was caught making conservative ideas in a private memo. here the conversation leak secretly, but it's fine with google. it shouldn't be fine with the u.s. congress who is testified -- it would be nice if one elected representative asked about this, because it's much scarier anything that russia ever attempted. peter schweitzer of "clinton cash," he joins us tonight. are you surprised by this?

we contacted google about these remarkable emails and reply to us is here in full.an "these emails weret a brainstorm of ideas, and none ever implemented. google has never modified search results to promote a political ideology, not in the current campaign season, not during the 2016 election, not in the aftermath of president trump's m order on immigration. our processes and policies would not have allowed us to -- nor did google say anything about these employees on this email chain. presumably, they still work at google, which is remarkable. if you ran a bank and you caught your tellers' brainstorming howw to rob the vault, would they still work for you? google fired a engineer named james damar, flew back to fire him, wipe like that because he was caught making conservative ideas in a private memo. here, google employees are plottingin to subvert our entire public conversation secretly, but that is fine with google. it shouldn't be fine with the u.s. congress who is scheduled to testify on capitol hill next week. the topic is privacy. it would be nice if one elected representative a

they will craft emails that look like a very email and they will create websites that look like realwebsites and driving to then and then infect you with malware or teach you to enter your credentials. part of it, because back education, there's a reason for that which is because people will think i know about phishing, i know about the nigerian scam, i'm not going to fall for that but the minute records if they're being targeted, if they're not paying close attention they met not notice. and there's the concept of waiting with her going after one particular person, maybe it is the candidate for the campaign manager in those efforts can astronomical and sometimes they are hard to see past and that's where having an i.t. infrastructure set up that is resilient, make sure you don't come if you do get to the one the person you don't get into the admin sites and the kind of thing can be beneficial to you. it's going deeper on these topics like phishing where a lot of education may be missed. >> we both browsers as products and the browsers sometimes,, having people go to these sites that

back pretty much in a week unless we have a lot, a lot of emails. so we can notify you but we're not sure on the actual turnaround time. in terms of priorities for fixing areas in the parks and playgrounds, the number one is really a safety concern. so if it's generally something is completely unsafe it's going to be attended to faster than something that just a cosmetic complaint or inquiry. yeah. >> okay, excellent. one last thing -- the registration online, you know, it's a tad complicated and just some input, it's not a fun experience to go through. there is -- you know, the summer programs that you have that you offer, camps and everything, i kept trying to look for those but they fill up so fast and i just wish that there was a ran rank -- excuse me -- that rec and parks would expand the program for summer offerings because it seems very limited and they fill up so fast that a lot of people are not able to get in. and there's only a one or two-week window to even deal -- you know, to get in on it. and so for myself son, we end up paying more f

you can see, guys, i have the email in my inbox. >> don't open it just yet.want you to do is, i want you to imagine that i'm on tour in any country in the word, what country would that be. >> italy. >> christian, i want you to imagine you're on stage with me and we see a famous female celebrity icon. >> j. lo. >> charity, i want you to name a certain kind of cuisine. >> med aterrainion food. >> what kind of food did we order? >> gyro. >> we got italy, j. lo, mediterranean food and gyros. >> tell your audience ahead of time i did not tell you to say anything. >> correct. >> open up the email please. >> i was in italy for the weekend, i met the super star j. lo i took her out for dinner and we ordered gyros. >> no, no, no! >> how did you know that? >> what was on the gyro? >> what kind of >> i'm going to send them to you in the email. >> you really can read someone's mind through skype. >> thank you >>> that's all the time we've got for this episode. you want more, you can always head to our websighhicom. tada! hello there friend! hi! hey there. i'm an imaginar

ainsley: emails i withheld because they are confidential.ey won't be confidential. everyone has an email saying now they are confidential and cory goes up and says i am releasing these and might lose my senate seat and i spartacus but when you know the facts they are already declassified and nonconfidential. brine back the passage where he is standing up will make a great 2020 i am running for president commercial. fundraising -- finance this. >> the public is smarter than that and people on the left want to run against him and point out how wrong that moment was. >> if you look at senators on the committee, democrats who want to run for office is trying to get their questions in for the democratic party. kamala harris from day one right out of the gate just stepped in and interrupted him. brine brian: trying to trap brett kavanaugh into saying he has spoken to the law firm who represented the president. and brett kavanaugh said i don't know who you are talking about. ainsley: when cory booker said that, what do they say, what are they relea

you're in constant email contact with others in the campaign and you don't tell them about this? >> well, we have to look back at what was happening around that time. i think around that time is when corey lewandowski had just been fired. paul manafort had just taken the helm of the campaign and i actually had reached out to manafort and told him, look, i have information that the russian government might want to host candidate trump. are you interested or not? i just don't want to continue this exercise if it's fruitless and as far as i remember it didn't seem that paul manafort wanted to pursue this meeting so as far as i remember why on earth would i then after i was shut down i guess in a formal way after a lot of vacillating between the campaign would i then tell the campaign something like that. >> well, but you continued to pursue a meeting and you did have other meetings with diplomats in may. >> yeah. >> including the australian diplomat, alexander downer, where you did tell him about this. >> allegedly. i have no recollection of ever telling him that. i remember many de

even more struck text and emails have been on earth. this time, they are casting a suspicious light on the obama administration. according to attacks on january january 23rd, strok texting page, they are concerned with over sharing. they do not want clapper -- potentially makes enemies. we are unclear what that stands for, but it may mean the classified raw intelligence. high-ranking peter strzok is concerned that the obama white house may potentially weaponize intelligence and use it against political enemies, the same clapper who spewed anti-trump federal at his cushy gig at a fake news. these text are before they released a report showing approach from interference, one more piece of evidence that those of the highest levels to prevent trump ever getting elected and destroy the president after the election. sadly tonight, we still have people working in our bloated federal bureaucracy actively working against the president bragging about it and are proud about it. we have the proof. james o'keefe, project notice , they have uncovered

a just released email from 2003 suggested kavanaugh believed roe versus wade is not settled law. and the day began with a contentious debate over the release of documents that had been marked confidential. mola lenghi is covering the hearing. >> shame on my colleagues if they conceal them now. >> reporter: a battle over the release of more than 100,000 documents related to supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh dominated the first part of thursday's hearing. >> there's no classified documents here. >> do you want to give up your emails right now and make them public? i don't think you do. >> reporter: democrat cory booker dared to face disciplinary action. >> i'm hoping they will bring charges against us and i'm willing to accept the full responsibility. >> reporter: senator dianne feinstein questioned kavanaugh about a previously confidential email he wrote in 2003 while working in the george w. bush white house. he said i'm not sure they all consider it law of the land since court can always overrule its precedent and three justices on the court would do so. >> this has been vie

there were two emails that preceded this one about -- >> tucker: these were texts, not emails. >> sorry said to paige that the doj was getting all political and worked up about changing the media leak regulations. and there was a second one, at the same day of this one that you referenced that said, look. if comey and mccabe are changing this, we need to talk with them. then there was one that you referenced. i like mark meadows but you have to give him the benefit of the doubt here. >> tucker: i'm confused. let me be clear. >> you are having a predicate for something that's not factually untrue. >> tucker: i don't know what the full extent of what they mean, we don't know. and i won't pretend that we do. these two in fbi employees, and before they appeared, they were part of a leaking strategy. i'm not saying they broke federal law but i'm asking you a simple question which is are you comfortable with this. >> the predicate is just not true. when he said well done, that was in reference to a "new york times" story on april 22nd about comey. so you are trying to conflate two things that

let's talk about a fundraising email that was sent out.emocratic senator hirono apologizing for using this as an opportunity to fund raise. some supporters received this email, while i am focused on stopping brett kavanaugh's nomination, i'm asking you to step up and ensure my team has everything they need to win our campaign. a fundraising message was sent this morning in error. we apologize sincerely for that era, campaign send that email and the apology. a lot of people saying this was a wrong move and it is good that she apologized. shannon: fundraising email started going out almost immediately. be aware of that. thank you, have a great weekend. the time is 26 minutes after the top of the hour. emotions running high from brett kavanaugh and christine ford during the powerful hearing. >> you believe brett kavanaugh assaulted you? >> 100%. >> we should pray for the woman. >> that moment got me. jackie ibanez is here with your reaction to the key moments from that testimony. we want to know what you have to say for sure. ♪ don't let me d

now google is framing the email chain as just a brainstorm session among junior level employees.errill stone, head of google participate shills and global marketing manager chimed in on the chain how partisan should google be on this issue. writing quote, to the extent of my knowledge we with be breaching precedent if we only gave highlights access organizations to support a certain view of the world in time of political conflict. is that accurate? if so we would be willing to open access to highlights, to ngos that actively support the ban? question mark. google gives me this statement in response saying these emails were just a brainstorm of ideas, none of which were ever implemented. the processes and policies would not have allowed for any manipulation of search results to promote political ideologies. ashley they're telling me they're taking no action against any of these employees. no internal memo went out to the company, explaining this is against company policy. ashley? ashley: very interesting, hillary vaughn, thank you very much. appreciate it. doesn't speak well to ac

, democratic emails. it started long before the fbi investigations been -- began long before hillary clinton lost election. easy to prove. on accurate. democrat from pennsylvania. good morning. caller: good morning. thank you for taking my call. that duringnline the -- scandal, there were with complaints against him and kavanaugh, and that they had notified grassley and feinstein. in july. on the colorak yesterday, who was railing against keith allison, you said they had photographs and video, and the woman went to the doctor for anemia and i don't know how one would get a photograph of anemia. if that is true i would like to hear it. thank you. i'm not really familiar with -- neither of those things are things that we have fact checked. thewe have not fact checked relationship between kavanaugh and krasinski. he has said that he was unaware of allegations that the judge had harassed women in the office. or in his courtroom. so, i can't comment on that. keith ellison, i am unaware of the issue. host: what

they can send you email to a different account. they can notify you in some way. if anyone is looking to improve their security on e-mail or on facebook, google or bing two-step verification for whatever e-mail you use and have come up on any search engine and send you that way. we really encourage people who are using individual emails e-o get a campaign started to do two-step authentication. we try to talk to campaigns about and jenny and i have lots of conversations about this, as the campaign grows what's great about our e-mail services today is that you are scalable or if you start with two or three people on the campaign and an office 365 account can be great for you with two or three people and be able to grow up to 12 people by the time you have a full-fledged campaign six months down the road, same thing for gmail enterprise e-mail service, so it expands as a campaign expands. the good thing about enterprise e-mail system is a comes with its own security letters as well as an administrator. with costly try to educate and tell people why maybe think on ent

to send any violent emailed to my wife? to make any kind of allegation against me and against my friends to blow me up and take me down? for decades to come, i fear the whole country will reap the whirlwind. the behavior of several of the democratic members of this committee and my hearing a few weeks ago -- in my hearing a few weeks ago was an embarrassment. but at least it was just a good old-fashioned attempt. those efforts the network. -- those efforts did not work. when i did ok at the hearing, when it looked like i might actually get confirmed, a new tactic was needed. some of you had it ready. this first allegation was held in secret for weeks by a democratic number of this committee and by staff. it would be needed only if you could not take me out on the merits. when it was needed, this allegation was unleashed and publicly deployed over dr. ford's wishes. as no doubt was expected, planned,ant, -- not came along series of smears designed to scare me and drive me out of the process before any hearing occurred. crazy

my email address is charles. charles -- .schneider@legis.gov i would be happy to make sure you are getting your questions answered for your daughter. >> this is from ohio. >> causing heart attacks, strokes, cancer. grassley passed legislation, reclassifying. they are crushed on loading docks. or frozen in winter. showing iowa baby chicks on a conveyor belt being sent a live into a crusher to come out paced. then i think we got the point. -- >> i think we got the point. it is in their best interest. abuses going on, i think they would want authorities to know about that, because they don't want anyone being given a black eye, or giving a black eye to the agricultural community. i'm not familiar with this particular case she was referring to. i gave my a mail address out if she would like to email me as well. it's something i will certainly look into. >> are there a lot of regulations on the state level? >> i'm not an expert on how inflation is compared to other states. there are regulations on the books. someone h

so i forged emails, i created fake email accounts and sent emails to a few of my friends as though iere the professor and said, here are things to consider in the application process, here are ways to tweak the essay, things like that. and then it all backfired. it was interesting because it did not backfire right away, was a few months. i had stopped because i did not want to keep doing that anymore. i let the emails peter out, and we got to october of my senior year, and boom. it blows up. brian: what happened? zachary: i am called into the principal's office, he has the stack of papers and he says, did you write these emails? and i am just open mouthed and florida, i don't know what to say, my dad is sitting in the room. he is shellshocked, a nervous wreck. i am thinking to myself, i have to talk to my dad, i don't know what he knows, what is going on. extremely uncomfortable situation. i end up being given the option to either go before the conduct review board, which was interesting, because people at one port -- at one point had told me to run for the conduct review board. a fe

only had to read the email once. second, the 6% figure counts millions and millions of pages of irrelevant steps, secondary documents we never, ever requested or needed. more importantly, we received 100% of the documents we requested from judge kavanaugh's time as an executive branch lawyer. and while we may have received 99% of justice kagen's white house records, we received 0 records from our most relevant legal service as a solicitor general, the federal government's top supreme court advocate, we received much less than 99% of the records as a lawyer a. and we didn't receive 60,000 emails from justice kagen, so 99% is an overestimate. and even though we never kagen them, justice solicitor general records were much more needed at the time because kagen was a blank slate as a judge. instead unlike judge kavanaugh with his 12 years of judicial service and over 10,000 pages of judicial writings on the nation's most important federal circuit court, justice kagen had zero years of judicial service and zero pages of j

we have set up emails.he e government was p providing scant information without phone numbers for us to facilitate the search. it was not really until august 10 with the judge really laid it down to say six weeks is enough. these children are being harmed come and we neneed these phone numbers now. the steering committee was formed and things hahave been me organized since then. amy: i want to turn to a new video produced by human rights with justice in motion about parents who have been deported while ththeir children remain in u.s. c custody. the video features claire along a human rights watch and two fathers who were deported from the u.s. to guatemala. was with my daughter. we were holding hands. en they seseparated .. they put me in a a jail cell. and they b brought my y daughteo a differere jail as well. >>>>ver the pasast few monthshse u.s.s. governmentt separated thousands s of children frfrom r parentnts at the bordeder come n know many ofof those famililiese bebeen reunifieded in thee u.s.n about

but i did just give my email address out if you would like to emailed the as well. that i willing certainly look into. host: are there regulations on the state level when it comes to farming practices? on howi'm not an expert our regulations compared to other states. there are regulations on the books. and if someone has a complaint or see something about the mistreatment of animals then there is a place they can go. to make that report. and it will be investigated. as far as how our laws and regulations stack up to the rest of the country? not in my area of expertise. host: senator charles schneider. the house and government is controlled by republicans. i'm sure you could list the benefits but what are some of the downsides of being completely in control. i haven't thought about it that way. i look for to the opportunity of having control in both chambers have had split control for some time and we haven't addressed some critical issues that we have needed to address in order to grow our state. example, the income tax reform bill that i mentioned hadn't been addre

that email resnse really didn't reflect what he thought. so he had to exp, lau know, settled law, precedent. how do doustinguish between the two. and he did point out that there are certain decisions of the supreme court, historical decisions involving issues that are unlily to come before the court again such as school segregation, brown versus board of education, that he felt d coy that that was correctly decided. that is settled lawt . said there is also a wholed aboutee of supreme court decisions, precedents that could come back to theupme court. and so he was following what other nominees had said, he can not comment. >> paul clement, what was-- whas would be thein his going on-- going ahead and saying yes, i thinthis was correctly settled, unless he doesn't believe it. in whh cse, you have a different situation. >> oh, i think the risks are quite considerable. and that is why i think judge kavanaugh invoked the nominee precedence am i think eveon peho sat in that seat in the senate judiciary committ hearing really has perceived that i

. >> i'm going to release the email about racial profiling. >> a very contentious start to day three of judge brett kavanaugh's supreme court coaring. fireworks over the release of confidential documents. >> knowingly violating the rules. >> i'm releasing committee confidential documents. >> police say four people are dead including the gunmen in a downtown cincinnati bank shooting. >> a wild chase ending in a violent crash. >> he lost it, he lost it! >> after a pair of ohio fugitives were tracked to oklahoma city. >> another major fire burning in california. >> it shut down a major interstate near the oregon state line. >> oh, mama. >> drivers were forced to abandon their cars and nearly 20 big rigs were left behind. >> ford is recalling about two million f-150 pickup trucks. >> because the seat belts can cause fires. >> the iconic american actor burt reynolds has died. >> during his time in hollywood, he starred in nearly 200 films and television shows. >> for the money, for the glory, and for the fun. mostly for the money. >> glor: good evening, i'm jeff glor. and this is our west

dramatic stand when senator cory booker appeared to flaunt senate rules by releasing confidential emails from kavanaugh's years in the george w. bush white house. one dealing with racial profiling after 9/11. >> i openly invite and accept the consequences of my team releasing that email right now. >> reporter: others democrat stood with booker. >> count me in. >> count me in too. >> reporter: those democrats face possible expulsion for breaking senate rules, but republicans claimed it was all a show because the documents had already been released. roe versus wade came into focus when democrats asked kavanaugh about an email from 2003 in which he wrote, i'm not sure that all legal scholars refer to roe as the settled law of the land at the supreme court level since court can always overrule its precedent. democrats demanded to know if that was a hint that kavanaugh will help to overrule the landmark abortion decision. >> it was referring to the views of legal scholars and i think my comment in the email is that might be overstating the position of legal scholars. >> reporter: he also trie

you don't generally put something that is totally against policy in a company email.ink it is just fine with your company, right? >> no. i think you're absolutely right. look where there is smoke there is fire. this is why it is so troubling okay? basically google when it comes to search engines and search results has a virtual monopoly. 60 to0% of all search queries in the united states go through the google search engine. nearly all human information flows through google, essentially they have the ability to shape public opinion in this country in politics or on issues i don't know anything the russians or chinese could ever dream of. melissa: i think it goes even further than that. you know, people that join these organizations that go to work for them who had political ambitions before they got there and may have seen the opportunity that this kind of platform presents. i mean somebody like sheryl sandberg, for example, who is in washington, has a lot of political ambition, did long before she went to work for first google or facebook, she is one example. what do

senate are on alert their personal email accounts has target said.l g mail accounts were targeted. sam widen is sounding the alarm with senate leadership. >> for dangerous foreign harkz, this is just a no brainer. pursesinal accounts are low hanging fruit. what you saw is the personal account, particularly of people like podesta and colon powell were the ones they went after firs. >> cnn has learned the targeting of senator's emalls occurred in recent months. sources say attempts were made at both democratic and -- staff. they're also not saying whether eany of the attempted hacks have been successful. how vulnerable are their personal email accounts. >> certainly it depends on whether they've done things like their best security practices. which foreign government is trying to hack senators? multiple nations are targeting people with associate would leaders and their staff. and fancy bear, targeting the dj party in 2018 and this fake email from prugsz intellgens afrss tricked them on to entering his password. thereside the be a drev drove. >> one th

he again had to explain that email to the judiciary committee. susan collins, when we asked -- when reporters asked her about that new email, she didn't seem that concerned about it, but, again, they haven't yet made up their minds. they're hearing vociferously from their constituents for and against. but all throughout this process, they haven't shown signs that they're struggling to get to a yes. that's what's giving mitch mcconnell and the white house confidence that those two very powerful swing voters will be a yes at the end of the day. >> we will stay on this. our great thanks to you for returning to the broadcast, seung min kim, thank you very much. >>> coming up a late live update on the story that will commend our attention in the latter stages of this week. unmotivated? feeling like you can't keep up? maybe you're tired of the same old workout. then you need aaptiv. aaptiv offers incredibly motivating music-driven workouts led by the world's best trainers. plus our classes are audio only, so you don't have to stare at a screen while yo

we have set up emails.he government was providing scant information without phone numbers for us to facilitate the seararch. it was not really until august 10 with the judge really laid it down to say sisix weeks is enou. these children are being harmed come and w we needed these phone numbers now. the steering committee was formed and things have been more organized since then. amy: i want to turn to a new video produced by human rights with justice in motion aboutut parents who hahave been deported while their chilildren remain in u.s. custotody. the video f features clclaire ag a human rights w watch andnd two fathers who were deported from the u.s. to guatemala. was with my daughter. we were holding hands. ththen they separated us. they p put me in a jail c cell. and they brorought my dadaughteo aa differentntail as well. o over t past t w months, the u.s. g government s separated ththousands ofof c children fror parents at the borderr comome en know many of t those familieiese beenen reunified i in th.

send an email to "dine and dish at kron 4 dot com" ....n form on our website. you can also check out our 'dine and dish' facebook page. (grant) that wraps up kron 4 news at 5.(catherine) ken wayne and pam moore are here with kron 4 news at six. (pam) thank you grant and catherine. only on kron4. we will take you inside an area left devastated by the largest fire in california history. and show you how a research facility that lost its work in the flames - is using what happened, to help prevent future wildfires. then - also new at six - we look at housing affordability in the bay area. and the local cities that top the list of 'least affordable' in the united states/ that's coming up next on kron4 news at six - right after the break. (ken)(ken) it's been six weeks since the mendocino complex fire erupted into the largest wildfire in california history. tonight - we have an exclusive look at some of what was lost - and some of the lessons being learned from the tragedy. hello i'm ken wayne.(pam) and i'm pam moore. among the losses... a more

if that email exists and is authentic, it should have been in the hands of the people who are asking the questions.xi he may have to be called back now to answer questions about what he meant, under oath -- what he meant by saying, we have a leak strategy. i doubt he will say under oath, it was intended to make sure there were no leaks. that just doesn't pass the d giggle test. >> tucker: very quickly, why are more people not outraged by this? does anyone want to live in a country where a law enforcement agency -- i know, this is a dayside. this is the side of every american who is subject to the fbi or any law enforcement agency. i mean, they should be scary to democrats as well as republicans. >> it is so dangerous to every american, today it's trump they are after and tomorrow it could be bernie sanders or hillary clinton, the day after tomorrow it could be you and me. that's why every civil libertarian, democrat, and republican has to be concerned about government by leak. we want full disclosure, we wano a lot of information that is now classified to be disclosed but there are p

i sent him an email about his prospects for running.o turn that email between two teenaged friend into something covert or wrong is laughable. jesse: so that was bluster, is that what you are saying? >> i will admit it was bluster. but i will tell you the following. i'm a real estate developer. i liked to build beautiful buildings. when i saw the positive press coming out and the fact he was running, i viewed that as an opportunity to try to get the tallest building in the world, or at least the tallest building in europe built. jesse: i assume mueller has talked town is that correct? >> i can't answer anything with on' going investigation. jesse: you have been interviewed by the house intelligence community? >> yes. jesse: are you worried about potentially facing any consequences? >> the on thing i did was try to build a big building and make it a trump building. i did not collude with anyone, and to the best of my knowledge no one i know colluded with anyone. jesse: an article says some mobster said you said you and president trump ar

recently, emails show that was not entirely accurate. judge kavanaugh repeatedly denied knowledge of the bush administration's policy on the gentian and interrogation. -- detention and interrogation but recently released a mouth showed that was not accurate. on theed working controversial nomination of judge william pryor, but recently released emails show that was not accurate either. in the case of dr. ford's allegations, the senate and the american people must ask themselves once again, is judge kavanaugh's complete denial credible? both cannot be true. whatdr. ford is saying and judge kavanaugh is saying cannot be true. that is why we need hearings and a bunch of witnesses and why we need an fbi investigation to continue. because there is an issue of credibility here. when you are nominating someone to the highest court in the land, their credibility should be unof digital. -- un and pageable. >> on monday, we will have the hearing with judge kavanaugh and dr. ford. that starts live at 10:00 a.m. eastern right here on c-span. you can

three four years ago now and i get to email it said i'm ready to commit suicide. and it was a transgenders would live the life transgender life for two or three years it was totally discouraged i was actually exchanging information and talking with them on some level up to five times a day to keep from committing suicide he eventually restored his wife transitioned . from. my dead. my chair my slippers and this is where i sit and work i don't need anymore than this everything that i do is right here on the computer or on the phone talking to people i did transition now for twenty five years longer and so it was when i did transition. everything began to make sense to me and when i realized that how important it was to d. transition to become psychologically emotionally and socially a healthy person that i wanted others who wanted to do transition to have a way to come back to that same experience that i have and if they have regret and want to transition i have built a website for them sex change regret com. in our area. yeah we're doing we're doing good billy con