good morning again, emily cohen, department of homelessness and supportive housing. and i'm here today to request your approval for a resolution authorizing the department to enter into an to a second amendment to our agreement with the episcopal community services, to continue to administer housing navigation services. this program began in 2021 to support the goal of moving at least 2000 guests out of the shelter in place hotels. as we began to wind them down and was incredibly instrumental in helping us reduce supportive housing vacancies and help improve the housing placement process for chronically homeless adults and adults experiencing homelessness. generally. this amendment was heard and approved by the homeless oversight committee on may 2nd. and again, i'm joined by chris callandrillo from ecs. if there are questions that he can respond to. again, this is a second amendment to the grant agreement to extend the term by two years and for a new not to exceed amount of approximately $16.7 million. the budget for this program funds mostly staff, including 19 hou

good morning again, emily cohen, department of homelessness and supportive housing. and i'm here today to request your approval for a resolution authorizing the department to enter into an to a second amendment to our agreement with the episcopal community services, to continue to administer housing navigation services. this program began in 2021 to support the goal of moving at least 2000 guests out of the shelter in place hotels. as we began to wind them down and was incredibly instrumental in helping us reduce supportive housing vacancies and help improve the housing placement process for chronically homeless adults and adults experiencing homelessness. generally. this amendment was heard and approved by the homeless oversight committee on may 2nd. and again, i'm joined by chris callandrillo from ecs. if there are questions that he can respond to. again, this is a second amendment to the grant agreement to extend the term by two years and for a new not to exceed amount of approximately $16.7 million. the budget for this program funds mostly staff, including 19 hou

good morning again, emily cohen, department of homelessness and supportive housing. and i'm here today to request your approval for a resolution authorizing the department to enter into an to a second amendment to our agreement with the episcopal community services, to continue to administer housing navigation services. this program began in 2021 to support the goal of moving at least 2000 guests out of the shelter in place hotels. as we began to wind them down and

emily cohen, dp department homelessness and supportive housing here with you today to discuss a resolutiont authorizes hsh to enter into the first grant agreement with compass family service to continue the administration of a scattered site family housing program called family housing ladder. the housing ladder program is designed for people who are currently in permanent families specifically that in the supportive housing programs but no longer need intensive on-site social service and this allows them to move into private market rate housing with a mobile doctor and continue to remain in the community in more independent living. this first amendment extend the term by two years and increase the not to exceed amount by approximately $7 million for total not to exceed amount of approximately $13.1 million. this agreement is 100 percent funded by prop c our city our home funds. like other scattered site programs, the majority of this annual budget is direct client services and subsidies and 25 percent is for salaries and benefits for the staff administering the program. i talked about thi

that seems like michael cohen fixing things while trump was kept informed to some top level degree. >> emily: which is usually the homelike of a fixer. they protect the principal, as kerri kupec has pointed out numerous times. when you hear someone like cohen is now saying every detail has been reported to the boss, that's a little surprising, because that is usually not what happens at all. in fact, an appropriate fixer leaves it vague to this plausible deniability, and the whole point of the fixer is to handle things in whatever way. so when someone tells you to handle it, that could mean a whole host of things, and that certainly doesn't automatically mean a specific instance. i note, as well, to this point, when eric shawn was discussing the demeanor of michael cohen, that might be the present presentation, that defense will certainly do and excellent job of piercing the credibility. no matter how much lipstick he put on a pig, michael cohen brings with him to the stand and incredibly exploitative, self-affirming, and self-aggrandizing approach to this entire thing. he is a disbarred att

people are saying, look you are winning this case if you could just hit michael cohen and emily? >> emily: a few different points that i think help to round out as one of the shape of: as a interesting party in the outcome. that sense of desperation. in costello as we said earlier, he also talked about the fact that michael cohen likes to cherry-pick emails and messages obviously to bolster his position, but the whole point is that the journey is getting a small slice of the end of the sea here that the motive behind it is clearly a district man. i cannot underscore enough the links a person will go through when they feel desperate and we have seen this in art criminal justice system, financially, fraudulently, criminally, so the motion that he felt somehow dismayed and discard it and somehow betrayed, by donald trump and his family was also played earlier this morning during cross-examination or those in audio for podcast made where he repeated what trump did to me and my family but it's unclear what that means, what are you talking about? because the investigation into michael

about whether or how hy violated federal election law so effectively that jerry got the m michael cohen. >> emilythat's the whole point of the trial, unlike you bill, you have been receiving legal analysis in real time. you have been hearing the facts laid out in this trial and hearing the testimony had been applying it yourself in that thread of emails from my generalist and esteem experts in the subject matter experts. especially in the overflow room, you've been able to protect together so it makes sense why things fill a little overwhelming but in part because you've been looking at the whole globe. they can about what the jury has been subjected to which is part of the globe, you said it yourself. that the novelty that the jury will have to apply the novelty of this very minute very specific very intricate form of law, and brad smith went out to talk about that even justice gildea said you know he is a smart one and incredibly brilliant the evening he self admittedly have difficulty with federal election last because it is in fact so intricate. so you apply that the end with this ribbon on t

. -- >> harris: nobody can defend michael cohen but i have a quick question for emily, i don't understandan the jury watched tiktok, they have their cell phones and their kids are on tiktok on that they have any communication with families i am just wondering do they get to see at all michael cohen of these antics? >> emily: exactly, that was part of the ongoing motion exactly that the exposure that this jury has to what has not been concealed from them and we've heard a lot of statements being heard in court that was explicitly just take, i guess i can be impartial and none of that is going to swimming at the end of the day that is only so much trust you can have one can argue we can see it where the judge says there is appearance of such but it doesn't go to the legal threshold of such that somehow the human level is a lot lower than the legal standard. >> harris: if we can get to the financial crimes in his michael cohen and we know that. >> kaylee: they need to hang on before the investigation because it looks like he's going to be retestifying very soon but we do not know when. pivot

cohen back and forth. you could see the valence as compared to other days was higher. emilye during the trial. i could imagine some jurors finding that to be concerning. >> right. like we were saying, like catherine was saying, you never know what the jury is thinking. but if blanche can't really get it all to hang together, how much is this going to matter given all the corroborating evidence, given that cohen is really showing up because he has to to fill in part of the story, rather than because he is the person conveying key information for the prosecution to make its case. so it's important for the defense to beat him up, but he doesn't have to be the whole trial here. he doesn't have to prove everything. there isn't that much that's actually hinging on the facts that he's testifying to. >> catherine, how much more of the cross would you expect to get to what emily referred to, do you have a different theory of the case, a different story about cohen? >> mr. blanche told the judge he's going to get it the end of the day thursday. he should be hitting. now, the cross may

. >> emily a look at michael cohen and rosie o'donnell and it's like the most unappealing pair.ption of jerry nadler's testicles. that's for you audience. [ applause ] >> if you don't lock at them i'll make it even worse. >> of the love of god laugh. >> it's like the ultimate would you rather. >> she would rather you. >> so look. i agree with you i think it's a rescue complex. he is who the left likes to pray. he is their conquest which is so and it is turned on trump. a former insider that's turned on trump net they hold him up like roast beef and say this is the 1 we should all listen to. the reality of today's testimony especially more importantly robert costello became on box earlier and talked about it is that 6 years ago cohen was swearing up and down in the throes of his suicidal ideation he had nothing on trump. he was so desperate, that i've nothing to give about trump. here he is 6 years later saying there is something on trump there's been a whole host of evidence withhold from a grand jury that's being withheld this jury but not being withheld from us as americans. a

cohen is -- you know, i have never been a fan of michael for various reasons. you know, he's a serial liar. he's shown himself to be incapable of telling the truth. >> emily> well, michael avenatti obviously has a problem with michael cohen. you can see it there. you know, one thing that i have been thinking about is the way in which cohen's previous testimony in the civil trial involving the trump organization gave him a chance to rehearse. you know, we're seeing someone here who is much calmer in terms of demeanor, is holding it together on the stand. and we'll see if that's enough to convince the jury. i mean, he has weaknesses. he has done lying in the past. whether he's now kind of atoning for that lying or making up for it by telling the part of the story that's true, i mean, that's what this tests. and obviously, if you have a record of being convicted of perjury, like automatically not the best witness. but the prosecution really tried to lay the groundwork for the idea that this isn't a great guy. they're relying on him for a key fact, for this idea that trump knew about these checks. the fraud part of the case against him. and so, you know, we'r

. >> trace: and aaron cohen talks about allowances, emily, and this really was one big allowance. i was talking to eden earlier about the number of redlines they sent down. there were times you have to move, you will be expelled, arrested, you will be this, you will be that. all of these things blue right through and now as we look at this thing, they had to bring the nypd and they are saying they want the nypd presence to be on columbia campus until may 17th at the earliest, so they are going to be there for a while. i think graduation, eden, is the 15th so they are going to be therethrough graduation, emily austin, your thoughts? >> you hit it nail on the head because what's unfolded the past few days have shown me that this is a student arrogance. these student rioters think they are about the law, they think that they are exempt from the consequences, they always play the victim card. they don't feel like they have to follow the law and order because, like alexis said, they are being, you know, detained but merely in a few hours they will be released and back to the usual prog

emily, i was interested because jonathan turley called this the michael cohen chart, you and i have talked about it previously he said the judge just said if they find any witness that has testify with regard to any material fact, falsely they can disregard the entirety of the testimony of the judge also said you may consider did the witness have a bias, these seem tailor-made for the star witness. >> harris: and that is the judge citing statutory law here, i echo your concerns. i am shocked at the vagueness here and the lack of specificity. when you think about how we proceed through life everything from your role as a employee to the concept of being a criminal defendant in the system you are afforded every protection and that begins with specificity. we had thought with one of my being faced with, what are the charges, what do i know? we had that at every opportunity that has been taken away from trump and it is mind-boggling to me that it continues through on the jury instruction and apparently the addition or calculation of that potential guilty verdict this is shocking to me that the

yeah, exactly emily, you know, you look at you. >> look at michael cohen and rosie o'donnel al as, likee most unappealing pair. and i mean with the exceptionnar of jerry nadler's. >> oh, that''ss you, audience. i proved that for you. see, i ]f you don't laugh at hi, i'm going to make him even worse. >> oh, god. laughs it's like the ultimate. d you rather i don't know who i think she would rather you. so look, i agree with you. i >> i think it's the rescues complex. he who the left like to parade.e he hfte is their conquest, whici is someone who is turned on trump, a former insider on trump.ed and now they hold him up like the roast beast and say, yes,s this is the one that we should s all listen to thhoe reality of today's testimony, especially more importantly, of robert costellothof, who cam on fox earlier and talked about it, is that six years ago, cohen was swearing up and down in the throes of a swea, that he still had nothing on trump. ad n. erate, desperate help me with anything, but i have nothing to give about trump. and here he isnothing to g six r saying that there is somethi

cohen. hello, everyone this is "outnumbered." i am kayleigh mceany here with emily compagno and harris faulkner. also joining us kennedy, and fox news contributor steve hilton. >> kayleigh: we have more details with eric. >> hello carrie, we heard some pretty salacious terror testimony from stormy daniels, e prosecutors i get into the heart of the case against trump, he is back on the stand right now after that was a 15 minute bread she seemed nervous appearing casual talking in a conversational way, about the prosecutor and the judge asking her to slow down. she began her testimony describing her upbringing working in the adult industry. film industry. then she recounted when she met the former president at a charity and 2006, she said that she playfully him on the rear with a rolled up magazine, the publicist then encouraged her to meet him, she said when she went up to his hotel penthouse to have dinner with him he was wearing silk or satin pajamas he said. just like hugh hefner. he then changed, at one point she went into the bathroom and when she emerge trump w

emily would need a transplant as she grew older and got sicker. the need became more dire. her brother daniel, who is 19 years older and worked at cohen'ss you think you were put on the earth for a reen, donating an organ. >> reporter: he had surgery in february to remove his kidney which was implant flood emily. >> my son is my hero. and my baby girl, whose life he saved, always my hero. >> reporter: and donating his kidney to his sister is something he had always considered. but even he was surprised at the reaction from others. >> like i say, you know, that i donated a kidney to my sister and people are like, oh, i wouldn't do that for a sibling, or i wouldn't do that for a friend. >> reporter: and because of daniel's selfless act, emily has vastly improved and getting better every day. >> having a living donor kidney as opposed to a deceased donor kidney helps the kidney to kick in faster often than with a deceased donor. >> reporter: emily danced for the doctors and nurses who helped her. and of course her big brother daniel, who gave her the gift of life. >> i think of him as my hero. he's very nice to me, unlike other brothers. a

emily, we will put the sketch back up. it was such a moment. whatever the jury hears about michael cohen, there will be some conflicting information on credibility. but a lot of people are reporting out the same stuff cohen says. >> right, that is crucial here in terms of setting up cohen's testimony. you have david pecker from the national enquirer. and you have stormy daniel's lawyer. creating a set of buffers and you have the alleged conspiracy. hopefully by the time from the prosecutor's point of view, they are set up to believe him because all of these other people have put the building blocks there for him to stand on, so to speak. >> emily, what do you make of how quickly the violating posts by trump came down once the judge said you violated this. and you might go to jail if you don't shape up? >> this is the judge's courtroom. he gets to make the rules and trump can bait him into the kind of fines we saw today and the threat of jail time. you see trump moving to protect himself from these consequences. all of a sudden the more dominating approach has a real cost. and his lawyers

whether he has the composure to withstand michael cohen's testimony and perhaps every store hawaii daniels testify, i think that remains to be seen. >> yeah, emilyis is chess. people from the outside who say, gosh, he's gotten away with a little bit more, throw anymore jail. it is not that simple. there are complexities to this outside of the courtroom and inside the courtroom, because it is entirely possible that the appeals process with this supreme court for this act could pause or delay the underlying trial, which is the one thing that donald trump and his lawyers have done to all other cases. so when i say chess, i just mean several moves rather than just one. i'm curious what you think about what was a fairly unusual stand-off today. >> yeah, i think it's always important to think about how trump's conduct distorts everybody around him and we're watching the judge struggle with exactly that. the legal system has rules. it's really important for witnesses to be able to testify without being intimidated and especially for the jury to be free of that concern. trump keeps walking up to or crossing the line, the judge has to be firm. and yet at

either todd blanche or susan nicholas or emily bovee take over the cross-examination, if you were there doing that for donald trump, what would you do with cohennd i suspect i don't know mr. blanche only by reputation which is excellent. i worked very closely with susan pier and she is terrific and she did a really nice job with stormy daniels. but they've been -- it's almost like in the movie secretary where they are holding back on the final stretch but i think they get the web out and i think todd blanche comes out swinging in a measured way. cohen has an allergy to veracity. this guy can't tell the truth. he told "the new york times" none of this occurred. he's going to tell this jury and have told the jury it did occur. he's all over the board here and what's interesting in the place where i primarily practice in pennsylvania, our perjury statute has a subsection that says if it was sworn testimony, if in sworn testimony you say it happened and in sworn testimony beat you say it didn't happen, the commonwealth need not prove which is the light. they know he's lying. he's a proven liar. he lied to congress and he lied to the irs and it sho

emily. president donald trump struggles to unite his party. the reporting on nikki haley's refusal to endorse them. they say they are voting for someone else. >>> michael cohen will take the stand and president donald trump's criminal trial after a week of fireworks from another key witness, stormy daniels. >>> jen psaki will talk about her former boss's reelection campaign in her new book. grab your coffee and settle in. welcome to the weekend. >>> we begin this weekend with another wild outburst from president donald trump outside of court. he attacked the judge and prosecutors in the case, claiming his criminal trial is corrupt and declaring he would be, quote, very proud to go to jail for our constitution. his efforts -- he defied everything the constitution actually embodied. he is laying the groundwork to repeat that playbook in 2024. this week, we are talking by challenging the results of the next election. trump said people should, quote, follow your heart. joining us now from our homeland security adviser, olivia choi. >> are you following your heart? i am sorry. >> as long as your heart is not a lie -- saying whatever comes to president donald trum

fact that he says michael cohen felt when he want to washington he would be made into a white house chief of staff or the attorney general of the united states. back to you. >> emily: thank you so much, david baycol at new york versus donald trump, at trial at search of an imaginary car and what dou say? >> david: well, i used to work with one of brad's former prosecutors at the d.a. of manhattan for 30 years, he was a lifelong democrat and his father was a lifelong democrat, and we had personal political differences but we worked together on a number of cases. we were together on bbci and a number of very key cases and i was "wall street journal," i think the prestige of that office and how that pristiq has been brought so low by the d.a., to become a purely political case. you have a political judge and they're making decisions that probably would not be made by a more neutral judge and you have a prosecutor who was brought in from the doj for president biden stuart jay, to prosecute the case. there are so many conflicts of interest here, air force why is the case brought in at all because it was denied by the media press predecessor, denied by the southern dist