it is most likely pre-empted by state law. what do i mean by that? what if you had a law enforcement officer like his enemy, why does this person not want to walk around looking for illegals? in he can start picking on people. it is unconstitutionally vague. look at people code 647. if they are blocking the road or blocking a someone's door, call the police. bring the men, arrested them. it is already pre-empted. this problem is not unique to san francisco. that is why the state is taking care of that. >> they do direct filings. this puts a juvenile as young as 14 years old into the court system? >> i think it is inappropriate to file rather than the district attorney's offices. i've believe, as i said, it would be more for them to do it in that particular manner. most of the crimes are committed by young males. the juvenile justice department gives us the opportunity of changing people. there is a big difference. in the rare case, somebody has a long history has more crimes of that nature. she is acting as an adult. >> generally, i am opposed, but t

subject i have mentioned before, which was concerned about the members of my community being pre-empted. they are considering being pre- empted by someone who will say they represent neighbors or this mysterious entity which calls itself from time to time the navajo coalition. i came in here for 1645 pacific, and i saw quite a few residents in the area who were concerned. then, i saw an assertion that david chiu , the supervisor, and the neighbors had made an agreement, and here it is, and this is your marching order. i do not think -- i think the first of all, if something like that is happening, maybe you should consider consulting the attorney because the board of supervisors has a role where the appeal, not in the process of making the conditions in the first place. then, i saw something rather similar, without maybe the signed agreement in which i heard that lower pulp neighbors and middle hold neighbors supporting use of affordable housing. that did not happen, and i saw quite a few people who saw your notices and believed that the notices meant that they could come down and speak

basis of a penalty would constitute a violation of the judicial powers act in an area of law pre-empted by the state of california. the problem is quite clear. when we go into court on an unlawful detainer and we get a judge to approve a settlement in superior court, then the city and county says that there is a wrongful depiction, there is a difference of conclusions. how is that going to be resolved if you have got this encroachment on the jurisdiction? getting back to the amnesty case, which counts of referred to, that case involved a waiver of the ellis act by the property owner. that waiver was held to be not enforceable. the city cannot require somebody, a property owner, to waive their state, federal, or constitutional rights, unless there is compensation. there was no compensation paid to my clients. they are independent business people and therefore are absent any compensation. it would be an unlawful taking. we are not here to challenge the bmr law. it is a good law. we are not here to challenge anything except the fact that my client do not come within the type of property ow

it goes into law that is pre- empted by the state of california, said that is part of the improper and over -- enforcement of which we complain. vice president garcia: it would seem, and i do not want to make an argument that the planning department could make, and probably because i do not understand to begin with, but i thought their argument was that you cannot evict a person because that person was not actually paying a bmr rate. do you contend that the person was paying a below market rates, and whose formula was used for the below market? >> yes, the unit was paying the bmr rate, and the stipulation gave her until november. it was a loss to my client of approximately 30 $200, over $2,000 in damages, , which they a bad toupee, above and beyond normal wear and tear. this is an imposition on my client. -- of $2,000 in damages, which they had to bear. vice president garcia: is that agreed upon by the m.a.s. department on housing or by a formula that would be agreed to by both parties -- by the mayor's department on housing? >> by the city and county of san francisco. vice president g

as many of you know, the board of supervisors is, like supervisor chu indicated, pre- empted from considering potential health effects of cell phone antennas in our decision on whether or not to have the antennas, and i want to encourage the committee members to take their concerns to the federal level and to educate and to lobby our delegation in washington, d.c., as well as on the state level, because, unfortunately, things are out of our control here. our hands are tied. i think on our own behalf, it is difficult to be forced to take a position that is against my constituents' interests and what they would like, but i believe that at&t has adequately demonstrated that the need of the antennas is necessary and do not cause a some of the an aesthetic or other impacts. therefore, ask the colleagues' support the planning department's decision in this case, and i would like to motion that we approve this item. no. 28, and table items 28 -- 29 and 30. president chiu: supervisor cohen has made a motion, seconded by supervisor farrell. if we could take a roll-call vote on that item. clerk calvillo

but when we are pre-empted, we are pre-empted. >> thank you.s currently written, i understand this would narrow the definition of an automatic telephone dialing system. wouldn't this create a loophole that permits -- >> the bill proposes to define automatic telephone dialing systems as machines that randomly or sequentially generate telephone numbers. what this would do in effect is that the industry standard for dialers would not be included. would exclude what's known as predictive dialers, which are predominantly used by telemarketers and debt collectors. it would reverse the original intent of the telephone consumer protection. it is very concerning. >> this is a closely held value that came out of the legislation. i think that's where an awful lot of ups that is coming from. thank you for your testimony. if i noted in my opening statement a prior express consent, those are really important rules. they have mean to consumers. you have expressed consent to -- customers' mobile phones, what for him issue from delivering these important messag

ey'vannevenespokbu that f nklycaefs.e inhe ve'vveokha >> oe pde o maf slyteef in in a empts them a o fm athem etshem theyl go s ilen t ae tlehewasemem dition cateyholcs g w sl vent t r oba agn in20 ndonat wen vn 20 13oboag canin20 b t haer will c20e doownan >>hisyn tism i ca edha erill do fownda >>syn is>>m wn yed e atfoe social ste win governmt eactiat, th s's tia funlment miste.stwi ov yes >>e ha to ke oneti mthe t unnt streak w hen wees ce o>>urha o ne hes an miss ofhe wk. ak wn our hansof w coratution cotuon ngration day,he cy ofharl te n usverin tenolo raon y, c oftorlnspi binsesus rito cteservloener topid mointor ssts. crver kingommutiesreen... coratution mor s. . an builngs ng valmublees ento t. botcom litu...on whoa anils ale totli.oa ... theeoplinsi the coratution . heplsi hebeca e wh youdd vizon toour mpan cotuon cawhou vyou onn't tost ar an u muiply u ♪t isco ar so thinnew.mu ♪ly ♪ corizoso inw.♪ zo >> me w f hits missf thweek. e f hson,irstso yo thiis a it fmi the thwe . oplef corado w hon,stedyo hi a f heth w t olecodoej hher sas t wes and h tigheor iome h ta and in fore

. >> more than once, he tried pre-empt tively shoot down any rumors that may surface. >> absolutely not. if more allegations come, assure you people will make them up. >> as businessman, minister and outsider leading the presidential polls cain has become a target. he told the national press club he does not know who is behind the attack. >> i told you the bullseye on my back got bigger. i have no idea. we have no idea the source of the witch hunt, which is what it is. >> cain said he could only recall one complaint in innocuous terms. >> she was in my office one day and i made a gesture saying oh, i was standing close to her. i made a gesture. you are the same height as my wife and brought my hand -- i didn't touch her up to my chin and said you're the same height as my wife. my wife comes up to my chin. my wife of 43 years and put in there as something that made her uncomfortable, part of the sexual harassment in charge. >> national press club, mr. cain tried to reassure supporters herman will stay herman. he did acknowledge some people will be turned off by the cloud and said the oth

. >> we had the state law that was still in effect but the federal law pre-empt ed the state law. >> here's what's happening. the health care reform law requires calorie posting, too, and it says states cannot have a different calorie law. that's threw california into confusion. the law here must be exactly the same as the federal law but that's still in flux. the feds still have to adopt specific rules which probably won't happen until summer. until then, there is no law in place. the confusion was evident here at this mexican restaurant. calories were posted and then taken down. now, they're up again. >> there was some confusion in some corners of the restaurant industry because obviously, there's some restaurant companies that did not want to make the change. >> mcdonald's in san francisco has posted calories up there next to the prices, even though the law is still in limbo. >> the changes that we do in our restaurants are driven by what our guests want. they wanted to know what's in a hamburger, what's in the milkshake? >> here at carl jr., the company has refused to post calori

cel y thha's empt. e >> kberl a d reat d. th e pt.nt. krl >> b: what the telou pat i.sine. th is priity.ic new ork citnd nofiro ne you hinkths riy. oomb g shewldkit wor ouabou--nk mbsh >> b:or blo berg souuldet t of the b smong bines lorg th sd bum h ofhemo bhees $0 thum h cle-up $ fe >>ndre whys tlepef so - fe gre youust ecam>>arehy t - coervaveor f ereoutam sonds co va eri the fant you sds wantheealnswe ritheyheant corol t ou eryt ngntlweou eytcol d yttheyanto fure in erytng y d ske eyt featn drin yt y wh severlse u do >>reg: you endinsellwhere do regu tionntil >>g:ou indersolly fectyou. gu onil >>ob: und istan why soy ey d't ct au.ow smo ngn >>: ndan hyhoteroomut i d d i a mo payhe p ce teom i anda: wll deep i drayking sod p cong up, nd w locp newdrngod rcoortep, phicaloc teated bew an rte ocpy wl stphetalhug. t tewe b het nntn "e fiv"oc wstg. ♪♪ h n " ♪iv ♪ ♪ d cleags wi "th fiv fi." cagwith ♪♪iv fi ♪ ♪ ♪♪ ♪ ♪♪ ♪ gre welme bk to he fe." as oreupyel bto p testsage f" o oy me p pesthstsavee bece o orab . p thd ie sayec adoble? mea ab i uaytabldoe? x eaive ubl new epo

he wanted to pre-empt and give his side of the story first, and we obviously let him answer the questionsthat. we didn't know about it. we didn't know that they had twe tweeted that they had a national story. i assumed they had something either on herman cain or newt gingrich in georgia, but i had no idea what they had, i had no idea if it was herman cain or newt gingrich or somebody else. we eventually got the specific details from herman cain and then later they revealed the story and broke the story of this woman ginger white, and had a statement from her and a statement from the lawyer representing herman cain. so it was just sort of breaking as we were on the air. >> i understand why someone would want to jump out at a story, but do you think possibly here this may bite him, because if it turns out there was a sexual relationship, which, quite frankly, his attorney's statement later sort of alludes to and that we shouldn't even think about it because it's private business, the bottom line here is that he may have told a bald-faced lie to you, and that could be difficult to get out of

providing food security and good nutrition for the first 1000 days of life will also help pre- empts adult risk of obesity and related conditions. these are very important areas for work. another point that is important for usaid and nutrition is in other parts of the agency. there is a lot of heavy lifting. we are focusing more on hygiene and again on those metrics for child survival. >> thank you. i want to invite comments and questions from the audience. please, what we will do is we will bring some microphones over. what we will do is take three or four quick questions. please identify yourself. there are three hands up here. matt, if you could -- if you could identify yourself and offer a quick comment or question. i apologize. the podium has blocked your view a little bit. please. >> my name is michelle, and i am a professor of global health law at wagner school of law in wilmington, delaware, and my question is about health sector reform, medicines, etc. one of my observations over the last 15 years in this field, coming from practicing at law to defining my role in global hel

how the new but i felt like i was living in some sort of a video game and people were kind of pre-empting every move i made obviously as a result of accessing my private information. >> believing on had now more broadly to the question of the photography, and one of the photographs taken of you and published accurately or were they altered? an example you would like to tell about? >> i think a story to tell a picture that is unique. speed the other way around. [laughter] >> [inaudible] >> we were notified of this [inaudible] i have no objections. you were going on the u.n. charter territories. everybody is agreed then. it's not why would prefer to have have it happen. >> thank you. in this particular situation in the ambassador and all i was at the annual ball where many of the children were and many people were donating money, raising money etc., and there was a very sick child i was pleased with in the corner of the room who was pretending to shoot me and i was pretending to buy. we were playing a game and somebody took a photograph in the mirror and cut the boy out of the photograph an

y.atil is ts an exale o w ut's ai gog to oppen th paun of e ba toutan andxa o par w s the dgolto tent a emptopendrowi aarin a out hef d t itss apt paro g ofpewihat a aoneyut ll ce in rectit frous.arftey but cingretctenro don. you fd it tet on toniouin f day aftayftert da y niay heaftewer fro a da y frlyea scur forgn courory a fy wita po ticiur youore ner heoud of bere. it pociouneheakesof me a yber. 1kes ta ms a a t. y th e's ly milongree .ta at'sit. th s ey o$300illi.ilee 's. o and t00y arlie n dtati hd t ar mu mon we nve wn w reti. th d'sti h muone wtoni wing. tiuart i th canhink tni g. ines a toort tille witan nk th t -- tes way a thiisoo plang t outleit causth- ultitely t it' raylly hi laeir ney utrougus tus the tilyt' ry im on t r y greeug rit? the >>it'sheir mon dectl im t tee ri th im>> dir'stly ir eurone. dtl t thimiry ur and ina not -- well the ineseeadehip w ts td a ot- do ll is bheause ty've got esndep w ttereing helngourop t th bsehine tveopleot ac rdin greg oel top th med ane le numeus acogs,in i t hringed a t s me morns,g, ty ar iangrat ts. hng t rn targr t wh shod we cha, wh w

. >> wel -monlanu gaintheyi t rs tre >>el empt om theineyodd etrank comnsatnhe stridions we hnkhisomatufromhe eou tpaye. th areouperaomng uer a diffent t of res. tye threra u a fannffandt of fle i not r. a prite nn dtity le baed btheotaxpars. ri there ty ba be bacpad by. t he taxpers ey suld ve t saaculesby t tha pvate xps s entd ies t saesha phavete appantlyntheysidn' th'sow ve palyidicyousodd fnkn' th .icsd f mberme ifailg tolear the usin mket. er isoiltoar irediynfai e in a mt.hese i di nuseaiindite. a uallyse rewducce. se dodin't .ke a sen to m u alytew l. ce >> dot aeno m a >>ul? >> ectly re morof h? ely reornaly hs a the merinly ahe rin speatorgreato seyou. thaou. goetope theorea seu.ogs ha andatsnd. oehe mste doeshat syavnds a te est a gerl. eml you perture em to foxns.coou that puy hre ao rooer? lone . xnco at hoo? ne ?po;óoç8ñndmplwkñ?>ó ]úv'hç)gxwm? Ñ7;e çÑw;xwñk(wgjwwrç>nóñ?;ew;Ñ/óónçvo>wççpgv;ge =wrç>ñ??ç?>wxg = ,Ñ/[ç)?ç çgy?>vñ@sxg 6yow;@l@ñ÷@ñzçwÑ@zfñ>çúso oc/[q?gy@s>çmóv=yogñg?@ñ ?iñxwo>ñónyñ+y@zso @7 zy[ ongine [ nes wh mak us mberne inotorcle surae? whaks er inore ra l