esquire. i never knew what esquire meant.e on a list and you are not? are you supposed to be bothered? >> i am bothered because i feel terrible for them because i left the royal family saying they didn't want publicity and now they have to be on this magazine cover. we shouldn't be talking about this. we should be out there looking for the people who kidnapped then and made them do this. >> greg: that is true. this was at gunpoint. >> it must have been pure they went through all that. leaving the royal family because i don't want publicity and clearly they were kidnapped. we have to be looking for the people responsible. >> greg: jimmy, all i want is a divorce. i want him to go back home with this little bindle knocking on the queens door. boy, did i screw up. she is crazy. that is a netflix show i would watch. >> the crown royale. harry coming back home to his drunk ways. who wouldn't love that? >> greg: -- >> prince harry, he [bleep]. [bleep]. >> greg: i don't know. i can't read lips. >> it's 11:00 at night. nobody has any

aaron solomon with esquire digital. we appreciate your taking some time for us on the floor. thanks wow, we're following some breaking news right now in san francisco. all cable car lines are down at this moment and they will remain that way throughout the night. we're told. authorities are saying there was a smoke alarm that went off at the cable car barn and that facility was evacuated and now a power outage will keep those cable cars from running throughout the night. tonight there are going to be immune e buses running along those cable car routes to get people where they need to go. we're working to learn more information about this breaking story soon. as we know more. will pass it along to you. well, barry weather if you stepped outside throughout the day, you probably noticed some changes. feeling a bit too humid, muggy out. there are some moisture moves in from the south, and that is kind of the first ingredient we're tracking. that could lead to our main concern tonight being the thunderstorm chances in the possibility of some new fire starts taking a look here at t

he wins the nomination esquire magazine said they might as well nominate lassie the dog.n the same thing happens in 1980. literally, one of carter's speech writers told me in more than one interview they are so convinced all they had to do was to get nixon next to ragan or carter and reagan on a stage in a debate stage, and people would understand as a memo that i quoted a chapter title card are than reagan. they didn't notice reagan had never lost a debate in his life including against robert f kennedy. one of the things that goes on in this rise from this sees the conservative president elect of goldwater's platform and a conservative is elected as it happens almost completely under the radar. none of the issues will be so dominant over the years to come the era, abortion, the stagnation of the economy, are discussed in 1976. suddenly, i 1978 all these reagan like right wing candidates are winning. kind of seeing how they do it and how quite frankly antidemocratic tactics are a part of story. so what happens is basically to telescope it, the conservatives who lost with

having theor piece coming out in the new yorker made it harder i should say there was no article in "esquirehey have the one-two punch. but they werein silent they didn't say anything. and at the time i didn't have any intention of writing a book but then early 2019 the attorney general of massachusetts did something nobody had done up to that point pretty much every state in the union was suing perdue for the first attorney general to sue individual representatives of the sackler family with an amazing legal complaint and then i thought i will write a book. that is when the campaign started so at that point the raymond sackler family engaged a lawyer who specializes in intimidating journalist killing stories before they get written is his thing like a real murderer row of clients over the years and he started to s send me nasty letters demanding changes to the new yorker article which was a few years old and the new yorker got the factac checker to read check the piece they didn't make any corrections at all and threatening to sue me and that never let up he was quiet since the book came ou

on a lighter note, "esquire" magazine twice named her one of the women we love. frequent contributor and tv show she was also written for major newspapers and periodicals among them, "the new york times" magazine, the harvard law review, the christian science monitor and new york magazine and others. as npr senior national correspondent, linda brings her unique insights and wealth of experience to bear on the day's top news stories and more than 40 years since she first joined npr she served in a variety of roles including reporter and developing of all thingste considered for 13 years. from 1974 to 1989, she provided highly praised coverage of national politics and congress, serving as congressional and national political correspondent. she covered for presidential and a congressional election for npr and in the 1976 became the first woman to anchor network coverage of a presidential nomination convention and of election night. the first person to broadcast live from inside of the united states senate chamber and her 370 coverage of the senate panama canal treat

out in the new yorker made it harder because people in their world read so there was an article in "esquire" that came out added almost exactly the same time so they had the one-two punch. but they were silent the family didn't say anything. and at d the time i had no intention of writing a book. but then early 2019, the attorney general of massachusetts did something that nobody had done upy to that point. pretty much every state in the union was suing purdue he was the first attorney general to sue individual members of the sackler family. she had an amazing legal complaint with a t lot of new thought i will write a book. that is when the campaign really started so at that point it was announced i would do the book. the raymond sackler family engaged a lawyer named tom claire who specializes in to intimidate journalist and kill stories before they are written. that's his thing. so then he started to send me nasty letters demanding changes to thehi new yorker article which at that point was almost two years old. the new yorker actually hired a fact checker using his 15 page as a roadmap an

on a lighter note, esquire magazine twice named her one of women we love.quent contributor to show she is also written major newspapers and periodicals, amongk them the "new york times" magazine, the "harvard law review," the christian science monitor and new york magazine, and others. as npr senior analyst corresponded b linda wertheimer brings a unique insights and rapid expense to bear on the days top news stories. in more than four 40 yearse firsts joined npr she served ina variety of roles including reporter and host of all things considered for 13 years. from 1974-1989 wertheimer provided highly praised coverage of national politics and congress, congressional and national political correspondent. wertheimer covered elections for npr and in 1976 became the first woman to anchor her coverage of the presidential nomination convention and of election night. wertheimerer is a first person o broadcast live from inside the united states senate chamber and her 37 day coverage of the senate panama canal treaty debates won her a special help provide dupont col

there's an article in esquire that came out almost the same time also they had this one/two punch. but they were silent didn't say thing, the familyhe didn't. and at the time i did not have any intention of writing the book. and then in early 2019, the attorney general of massachusetts did something nobody had done up to that point. pretty much every state in the union was suing purdue. became the first attorney general to suit individual members of the family. she had an amazing legal complaint with a lot of new material in it. at that point at that oh, i'm going to write a book. that is when the campaign really started. it was announced i was doing this book. the raymond sackler family engaged a lawyer named tom claire. he kind of specialize in trying to intimidate journalists and kill stories before it has been written. that is kind of his thing. a real murderer's row of clients over the years. he started sending me nasty letters. demanding changes to the newew yorker article which at that point was almost like two years old. the new yorker actually engaged eight fact checker to

there was an article in esquire that came out also that the sacklers so they had this one-two punch. they were silent. they did say anything, the family didn't. at the time i didn't have any intention of writing a book. and then in early 2019 maurice healy, the attorney general of massachusetts, did something that nobody had done up to that point. pretty much every state in union with suing purdue. he was the first attorney general to sue individual members of the sackler family and she had an amazing legal complaint, a lot of new winter and at that point i thought i'm going to write a book. that's when the campaign really started. at that point when was announced i was doing this book raymond sackler family is of one wing of the family engaged a lawyer named tom clare we can specialize in trying to intimidate journalists and kill stories before they get written. that's his thing. kind of a real murderers row of clients over the years. he started sending me nasty letters demanding changes to the new yorker article which at that point was like almost two years old. the new yorker enga

now today, you were to have read the article by tom chenault, published in esquire 2003. this particular photograph which is a set of photographs, the man falling almost -- not all the way down but the photographer which it drew to snap a bunch of pictures in various positions, he wrote this piece about this particular image and tried to identify who this man was, difficult to do when you think about. in the piece you may recall he uses the phrase look this photo and others like it were iconic but not permissible. this photo appeared i think on page seven of the new york times september 12, i remember seeing it. i have it in my office i have a complete issue of september 12 want before i knew i would teach a course like this. it never appeared again. i shouldn't say never, it appeared in new york times book review 2007 but it was also published in other papers, it was seen on cbs and immediately taken off airways in the united states, it did not appear in magazines. there was a kind of voluntary censorship voluntary decision it should not be seen. if you pick up a europea

now today you were to have read the article by tom junod published in esquire, 2003 about this particularphotograph which is a set of photographs a man falling not all the way down but the photographer richard drew snapped a bunch of pictures and so he's in various positions. junod wrote this piece about this particular image and tried through investigation to identify who this man was your very difficult to do when you think about it. in the piece you may recall he uses the phrase that this photo, and others like it, were iconic but not permissible. now, this photo appeared on i think page seven of the "new york times" on september 12. i remember seeing it. in fact, i have in my office. i had that completely shut september 12 long before i knew i was going to teach a course like this. it never appeared again. it never appeared -- i shouldn't say never. it appeared again in the "new york times" book review in 2007 but it was also published in other papers. it was seen on cbs and then immediately taken off the airwaves in the united u, did not appear in magazines. there was a kind of volun

steven berlino esquire he is the lawyer for the laundrie family the north port police need your helppeople left on a trip and one person returned. #where is gabby, #find gabby. so you are appealing directly threw through twitter to brian laundrie and his lawyer to at least come talk to you and they won't talk to you? >> that is correct. you know, my primary mission in this right now is to find gabby. and i want to raise enough awareness out there to where everybody in this country knows about gabby petino. steve: okay. >> and hopefully that will lead us to her. steve: and that's a live image right now of brian laundrie's house. we believe he is there right now. i know you have had limited conversation with his lawyer. you know, we haven't heard from him. we have only heard from the family through the lawyer. has the lawyer explained why he doesn't want to talk to you guys and, instead, says they would like it remain in the background? >> the only thing we received was that statement and based on that statement, he said there would be no further statements made. steve so, to recap, ga