report to examination room b.ention all members of the stock list department, report to examination room b. >> the stock list department investigates the stocks to be examined. and the corporation must have substantial assets in the form of plant, tools, equipment and cash. it must have at least $1,500 stockholders who together own 300,000 shares of the corporation's stock. the corporation must show successful management and sales records and annual net earnings at the time of the listings for $1 million. the proposed stock issue must meet federal, state and stock exchange regulations, and the corporation must agree to report to its stockholders at frequent intervals. if the examination of the stock department determines it meets the minimum requirements of the exchange at the time of the examination, the corporation's application for listing is recommended. the board of governors of the new york stock exchange finally approves the applicant kargs and sees that it is made public. >> extra, extra, read all about it

the medical examiner changed his ruling to homicide. it sounds like one of the things that got the medical examiner to move from inconclusive to homicide was the measurements of the crime scene suggested that her body was too far from where mr. truman said she'd been shot. >> exactly. >> reporter: so after a ten-month investigation, the orem p.d. and the d.a.'s office arrested truman and charged him with murder. >> my mom called me and i fell to the ground crying and so happy that he was finally behind bars. >> reporter: going into trial, what did you think? >> i thought we had a strong circumstantial case. >> reporter: at trial the prosecution argued domestic violence ending in homicide. the defense, self-inflicted gunshot wound. the jury sided with the state. conrad truman was convicted of heidy's murder. >> it was like, finally got him. finally got him. >> reporter: and as far as you knew, that was it? >> that was it. >> reporter: did you think that was it? >> i did. >> reporter: but if you think that was it, well then you haven't be

the medical examiner changed his ruling to homicide. the medical examiner to move from inconclusive to homicide was the measurements of the crime scene suggested that her body was too far from where mr. truman said she'd been shot. >> exactly. >> reporter: so after a ten-month investigation, the orem p.d. and the d.a.'s office arrested truman and charged him with murder. >> my mom called me and i fell to the ground crying and so happy that he was finally behind bars. >> reporter: going into trial, what did you think? >> i thought we had a strong circumstantial case. >> reporter: at trial the prosecution argued domestic violence ending in homicide. the defense, self-inflicted gunshot wound. the jury sided with the state. conrad truman was convicted of heidy's murder. >> it was like, finally got him. finally got him. >> reporter: and as far as you knew, that was it? >> that was it. >> reporter: did you think that was it? >> i did. >> reporter: but if you think that was it, well then you haven't been watching enough "dateline." >>> coming

the medical examiner changed his ruling to homicide.t sounds like one of the things that got the medical examiner to move from inconclusive to homicide was the measurements of the crime scene suggested that her body was too far from where mr. truman said she'd been shot. >> exactly. >> reporter: so after a ten-month investigation, the orem p.d. and the d.a.'s office arrested truman and charged him with his wife's murder. >> my mom called me and i fell to the ground crying and so happy that he was finally behind bars. >> reporter: going into trial, what did you think? >> i thought we had a strong circumstantial case. >> reporter: at trial the prosecution argued domestic violence ending in homicide. the defense, self-inflicted gunshot wound. the jury sided with the state. conrad truman was convicted of heidy's murder. >> it was like, finally got him. finally got him. >> reporter: and as far as you knew, that was it? >> that was it. >> reporter: did you think that was it? >> i did. >> reporter: but if you think that was it, well then you h

ina intimate examinations.ment if voters do not support the conservatives. and jeremy corbyn has promised a relentless focus on the nhs if labour winds power on thursday. there has been an apology from shadow cabinet memberjonathan ashworth, who insists he wasjust joshing around when he told a tory friend there was no way labour could wind the election. tonight, jeremy corbyn has given mist or ashworth his full support. six people are known to have died and eightare six people are known to have died and eight are missing, presumed dead, after the volcanic eruption in new zealand. two british women are among those injured. greenland is losing ice seven times faster than during the 1990s, and will expose 40 million more people to coastal flooding if it continues. those are the findings of eu report. sport now and a full round up from the bbc sport centre. hello. good to see if it is only six months since liverpool were in the —— won the champions league but they are in danger of going out at the group stage of th

both getting it at the application phase with ex parte re-examination and expungement. we would say one thing on the expungement language we've seen so far, there is a clause within the draft language that gives us serious pause. we believe it created an actual loophole that these fraudulent filers could actually expose. it allows the extension of time for which to prove actual use in commerce from the time of registration all the way up to the time of the filing of the expungement. that extends the rights of any fraudulent filers. they could legitimately warehouse trademark registrations and start using it post-registration when we know these applications by law require use to be commenced at the time of filing. that undercuts the trademark system and we're eager to work with members of congress to understand why that language is in there and to come up with better language. >> interesting. thank you, mr. lee. any other comments from other members of the panel before i yield? >> i agree that expungement is a great start and that is would be very helpful. a low-cost, lo

a gp from east london who tricked his patients into having intimate and invasive examinations, has beenault. manish shah used his position as a trusted doctor, to persuade six female patients that they should undergo unnecessary smear and breast examinations. last year he was convicted of sexually assaulting another 17 women, between 2009 and 2013, at his surgery in romford. 0ur correspondent, chi chi izundu, has more. described as a well liked, respected and trusted gp, but the prosecution said manish shah took advantage of that description for his own sexual gratification. 0ne victim was 17. on a number of patients he carried out vaginal and breast examinations when there was no reason to, breaching medical guidelines. he just duped so many people. you know, he used our weaknesses, our fears, and just took complete advantage. but not one time did i actually think that he was doing anything untoward. the court was also told he'd mentioned celebrities, like jade goody, who'd died with cervical cancer is the reason to have the smear test, or angelina jolie who'd undergone a preventative

it's being done on the patent side you have patent examiners that are dedicated. it even have it on the trademark side. it's on the uspto with no extra funding legislative requirement under the new farmville adopted a special review team on cannabis related items. so it can be done, and murawski in that it would be dead in this case as well. >> professor beebe, let's just say we eliminated the future flow of fraudulent trademark application from china. to what extent we have solved the problem? >> to a very large extents i think based on our understanding of the data. there are still applicants from other countries and domestic applicants who are engaging in some degree of fraud on pto in order to establish an early priority dates for their application. but i think the main source of this problem, the root cause of the clutter problem appears to be sourced out of china. >> is are many research done on how they actually, how they're actually doing this? is this just an industry that bubbled up organically or is it something that is clearly entities within china are

a gp from east london who tricked his patients into having intimate and invasive examinations, has beenault. manish shah used his position as a trusted doctor, to persuade six female patients that they should undergo unnecessary smear and breast examinations. last year he was convicted of sexually assaulting another 17 women, between 2009 and 2013, at his surgery in romford. 0ur correspondent chi chi izundu has more. described as a well liked, respected and trusted gp, but the prosecution said manish shah took advantage of that description for his own sexual gratification. 0ne victim was 17. on a number of patients he carried out vaginal and breast examinations when there was no reason to, breaching medical guidelines. he just duped so many people. you know, he used our weaknesses, our fears, and just took complete advantage. but not one time did i actually think that he was doing anything untoward. the court was also told he'd mentioned celebrities like jade goody who'd died with cervical cancer is the reason to have the smear test, or angelina jolie who'd undergone a preventative doub

and this trial question that the attorney in cross-examination was trying to humiliate roosevelt and stain his legacy and put his hide up on the wall. and we believe of our speculation that his lawyer may have been part of the reason may be barnes attorney encouraged him to bring this lawsuit against roosevelt. >> so tell us about the action and what it was about and that also about this man william barnes who is the plaintiff. >> so take a step back a were allies fellow republicans in 1912 it was becoming a real divide between them coming out into the open roosevelt felt that 1812 nomination was stolen from him. and he would've had many more votes if individual voters had direct votes in every state in the republican primaries. instead the republican party bosses directed. >> i do think he lost the new york primary. >> today we have caucuses so it's not that was such an incredibly novel idea but roosevelt was convinced he was robbed. he may have been right. this really was party boss at its worst and barnes was responsible so roosevelt in 1814 was supporting a new york gubernatorial

when i tell people i work at the medical examiners office. whawhat do you do? the autopsy? i deal with the a with the enou- with the administrative and the families. >> most of the time work here is very enjoyable. >> after i started working with dead people, i had just gotten married and one night i woke up in a cold sweat. i thought there was somebody dead? my bed. i rolled over and poked the body. sure enough, it was my husband who grumbled and went back to sleep. this job does have lingering effects. in terms of why did you want to go into this? i loved science growing up but i didn't want to be a doctor and didn't want to be a pharmacist. the more i learned about forensics how interested i was of the perfect combination between applied science and criminal justice. if you are interested in finding out the facts and truth seeking to find out what happened, anybody interested in that has a place in this field. >> being a woman we just need to go for it and don't let anyone fail you, you can't be. >> with regard to this position in comparison to crime dramas out there, i

he had falsely noted in medical records that patients had requested the examinations.f the trials alleged she had similar experiences. before an appointment i would just be thinking, he'll probably do an internal, he'll probably find a reason. he found a reason, and that's what i noticed, i think. but he's a doctor and you trust them and your gut instinct tells you something is not right, but you can't put your finger on it and you can't go accusing a doctor. dr shah worked at this east london practice. he was reported in 2013, police were called in and he was suspended. an nhs spokesperson said sympathies were extended to the victims and anyone concerned was urged to contact the helpline. police sources have indicated this is one of the biggest cases of its kind involving one doctor. it does raise questions about the oversight of gp practices. a lawyer has told the bbc he intends to start civil legal action, seeking compensation on behalf of some former patients. it seems astonishing to my clients that he was able to behave this way for so many years without anyone ra

i think the minority memo might have been about sinclair's cross-examination. we did do a formal memo for the minority memos -- members of the staff on that. there would be the occasional .esearch request dennis, some dave of the republican members. we have that obligation. on the other hand, i spent a lot of time with the democrats. it may have helped that my job was on the legal, constitutional side more than the factual side. it might have made that easier. chose thee committee broad interpretation of impeachable offenses and high what were demeanors, you focusing on? to continue to work on the legal case? >> i did a lot of work on the legal case. i listened to the tapes. myself, i proposed and presented to the committee, the case on impoundment. article six was not accepted. it did get some votes. -- there hadot of been 15 or 20 cases. that was very law heavy. got sent to the committee, the six articles? >> it was submitted because i testified before the committee. i think it was voted down 27-11 or something like that. did you play a role in shaping any of

i would like to examine what the effect of not authorizing this program would have. can you tell me what successes the program has had and particularly when it comes to individuals coming from other parts of the world that are known and basically suspect interest, special interest a wind or tfts, suspects the terrorist coming in up through latin america into the united states of america. >> the program is a minister by ice, it's a program that they work with the foreign counterparts to utilize fingerprint technology to take fingerprints of those populations you referenced as a transit through certain countries and salt to roll in south america. making their way on up through mexico to the u.s. if they show up in central american country, the foreign authority will use the program to collect the passport information and the fingerprin fingerprints, when that person shows up at the southwest border and has mysteriously lost their prosper, were able to take the fingerprint to match it back up with the previous encounter in central america to sufficiently identify who th

how they are increasing the number of post audits and how increase training is being provided to examiners to identify and more closely scrutinized suspicious specimens. those are all great efforts, and they should be commended for his work, but i think congress also has a role to play in addressing this problem. that is why we are holding this hearing today. we want to hear from experts about their experience with fraudulent trademarks, and how they're negatively impacting american businesses and consumers. i'm also interested in the recommendations, your recommendations on what steps congress should take to combat the problem. finally, while this is our first hearing in the senate, our counterpart at the house of representatives have been working on the issue for months. house just this year committee chairman jerry nadler and ranking member doug collins have done fantastic work but i appreciate the work. i am looking forward to this positive impact. and i would like to keep on with his work. thank you for being here. and i hope you view this has just one of the series of discussions to

clair's right of cross-examination. there would be the occasional research request for there dell latter, chug wiggins, robert mclurie, somebody on the -- dave dennis, some of the republican members and we'd do that, i thought we had that -- that obligation, on the other hand, i spent a lot of time with the democrats, it may have helped my job was on the legal constitutional side more than the factual development side. might have made that easier. >> once the question chose the broad interpretation of impeachable offenses or high crimes and misdemeanors, what did you shift? what were you focusing on? continued to work on the legal case? >> yeah, i did a lot of work on the legal case. listened to the tapes, by myself, developed and proposed and presented to the committee the case on impoundment, which i think was article 6:00vi, not accepted, but did get some votes that one did involve more courts of law. there had been 15 or 20 cases, mostly slapping down the president's position, some upholding it. that was very law he

i think there has to be an examination of how our prison services work and crucially what happens to someone released from prison. two people, including 25—year—old jack merritt, were killed in the attack by a man who had beenjailed in 2012 for his role in an al-qaeda inspired plot. former wales rugby captain gareth thomas says he wants breaking the stigma around hiv to be his everlasting legacy in an interview with prince harry to mark world aids day. we know there's a hell of a lot to do, but what you have managed to do in the space ofjust six or eight weeks has been transformational. police in hong kong use pepper spray as thousands of protesters return to the streets to maintain pressure on the territory's bejing—backed government. joe root returns to form in new zealand, hitting an unbeaten century, as england edge themselves back into the second test on day three in hamilton. and foreign correspondents based in london give us their take on the week's events in dateline london at 11:30. good morning. welcome to bbc news. the prime minister says the government is reviewing the li

in fact, this subcommittee's first hearing earlier this year examined possible carcinogens in talc-based products. johnson & johnson objected to the hearing, complaining that it had not been invited to participate. an immediate -- in a media release, johnson & johnson stated, "the subcommittee did not hear the preponderance of evidence that supports the safety of our products." we gave the ceo almost a full month's notice of our interest in his testimony. we wanted mr. gorsky to come forward with their side of the story, but he declined. i can only guess why i'm speaking to an empty chair, but here are the facts. evidence shows tests have found that johnson & johnson's tal c-based baby powder contained asbestos. more sensitive testing methods have detected asbestos in talc. an internal johnson & johnson memo from 1975, employees discussed suppressing the use of sensitive asbestos detection methods, stating, and i quote, "we want to avoid promotion of this approach." mr. gorsky is not here to speak to that. there is evidence to suggest in the late 1980's and early 1990's the company pushe

clair could be there and cross-examine. and then i guess the issue in a grand jury, the defendant's council is not there. >> most grand juries. some states by statute permitted defense council. >> is this one of the -- sort of discussions? >> yeah, there were a lot of arguments about whether the standard here was probable cause, 4 out of 9. preponderance, 5 out of 9. reasonable doubt? >> you mean five out of nine jurors? >> no, percentage likelihood. a grand jury if they find a four out of nine chance something has happened, that's probable cause. there are all different standards of proof required. another would be preponderance, 5 out of 9 or 6 out of 10, however you like. as another standard in fraud cases, the requirement is clear and convincing evidence, loosely translated as 7 out of 9. and then beyond a reasonable doubt, which is sometimes translated as 9 out of 10. so you know, the people who wanted the president be-to-be impeached said we don't -- president to be impeached said we don't have to prove this thing, th

this hearing provides committee an opportunity to examine the current state of and recent activities related to regulatory and supervisory activities of these agencies. it's been over a year now since the enactment of s 2155 economic growth regulatory relief and consumer protection act and the work of the agencies to implement most of the laws provision. your agency should also carefully review the existing supervisory frameworks and make necessary adjustments to appropriately align them with the tailoring rules and requirements. on july 30, 2019 all republican banking committee members and i sent a letter to the federal banking regulators urging your agencies to finalize several outstanding positions of s 2155 such as the community bank leverage ratio and short form call reports. further taylor organizations to promote economic growth including addressing the current expected credit losses accounting standard and local rule, the inter-affiliate inter-affiliate margin and madden. thank you for acting on many of these priorities. i encourage you to continue exploring additional opport

i'd like to examine what the effect of not authorizing this program would have. mr. wagoner, could you tell me what successes that has had a particularly when it comes to individuals coming from other parts of the world that are known and basically countries of special interests, special interest aliens or suspected terrorists coming across up through latin america into the united states. >> it's administered by ice in a program we work with their foreign to parts to utilize finger print technology to take fingerprints of exactly those populations users reference as a transit through certain countries and central america making their way on up through mexico to the u.s. so if they show up in central american country the foreign authorities will use the bitmap program to collect the passport information and their fingerprints. when that person ultimately shows up at our southwest border and has mysteriously lost their passport we are able to take their fingerprints and match it back up with that previous encounter in central america to sufficiently identify who that p

by republican examination. facts matter, and i hope that we can agree on that. >> i yield to mrs. lofgren. >> i would like to note that going back to the analogy, the gentleman was correct that there was nowa public presentation on the judiciary committee, there was quite a few depositions that were private, but there was a lot of public testimony before the senate watergate committee. as you will withdrawal, john dean appeared and testified that there was a cancer on the presidency. and theth fact that it happenedn the senate didn't mean that the judiciary committee didn't know about it, the whole country knew about it and took notice of it, there is only a few members of us that were on the judiciary committee in the clinton impeachment. i was one of them. mrs. jackson lee was, we had a report from mr. star, i remember it very well, we didn't have extensive fact witnesses. we had the report, we had evidence in the ford building to go look at privately and a number of members did, but the gentleman as correctl

rowe price, hundreds of our experts go beyond the numbers to examine investment opportunities firsthandke a biotech firm that engineers a patient's own cells to fight cancer. this is strategic investing. because your investments deserve the full story. t. rowe price. invest with confidence.

to also examine how dangerous the melting permafrost is. what mists are involved in geo engineering climate in focus on. changing the 90 minutes on d w. d q you know that 77 percent. are younger than 6 o'clock. guts me and me and you. and you know what it's turned all voices but part. of the 77 percent we talk about be to shoot stuff. this is where. the 77 percent this weekend on d w. this is news live from berlin france is paralyzed by one of its biggest nationwide strikes in decades french public sector workers closed transport hospitals and schools in a protest against proposed pension reforms to a strike isn't over yet so will happen today also coming up u.s. president donald trump day as the the.

novelist laila lalami examines immigration and entity through fiction. and: ♪ hark, hear the bells >> nawaz: united, we s members of the united states armed forcesround the world perform "carol of the bells." all that and more, on tonight's pbs newshour.

>> to my republican colleagues, our message is a simple one -- democrats want a fair trial that examines the relevant facts. we want a fair trial. >> article ii is adopted. >> the morning after making history, passing articles for abuse of power and obstruction of congress against president trump, speaker nancy pelosi seemed eager to change the subject. >> that's all i'm going to say about that now. i said what i was going to say. i said this is it. any other questions on any -- anything on mexico free trade agreement? anybody care about that? >> pelosi said she's holding out for assurances that there will be a fair trial in the senate. but democrats argued ahead of the house impeachment votes that it was urgent for law mangers to act now. the house gop leader called out pelosi. >> now we have the speaker of the house who is so embarrassed, she admits the failure of this

medically, were examined physically. there was zero evidence, zero. both their hymens were intact, this is perhaps more specific than people would want, but trust me if you had been repeatedly violated as a small child by an adult, there are going to be repercussions of that physically and medically. there was zero evidence of that. >> joining me now one of the courier reporters who broke this story, lawyer and president of the non-profit criminal justice publication, the appeal. let me start with you. there's a what and a how here. there's the actual pardons and commutations offered by the governor and also the way he did it. i want to talk about that for a second. my understanding is there was no public rationale, no comprehensive paper put out by the governor. instead reporters like yourself learned of them case by case. >> right, when governor bevan lost his election by 5,000 votes in kentucky, he was never someone friendly with the press or had an open door with the kentucky media. we began to see in the secretary s

i wish, as the gentlelady just said, i wish they would examine the factual conduct but i guess that's not going to happen. i yield to the gentleman from louisiana, mr. johnson. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. johnson: thank you, mr. speaker. the founders of this country warned us against a single party impeachment, because they ar it had would bitterly and irreparablely affect our nation. in the years of this republic, there has never been a single impeachment than the one being used today. our colleagues have weaponized to nullify the votes of 63 million americans who elected president donald j. trump this is not about a phone call or ukraine or use of executive privilege. you have to remember that 95 of the democrats on this floor today voted to impeach donald trump before the july 25 phone call ever happened between president trump and president zelensky and not only is this a single party impeachment, it's also evidence-free.

right to present evidence, to have my own counsel present, to confront accusers and to call and cross examine witnesses.

. >> if this report is out already, will the be an examination as the why behind the actual mistakes, or is it ai done deal? >> it will be interesting to see what happens tomorrow, we may get answers because he was going to go before the senateae judiciary committee which is a majority republican and led by lindsey graham who i just reference. it be interesting to see what and what the next steps they take after that. everybody is waiting to see what mr. horowitz says before the senate judiciary committee and before they move forward with whatever they want to do. whatever is going to happen is going to happen at the senate level because in the house that focused on impeachment and controlled by the democrats and will not call mr. horowitz to come testify. >> we heard from the attorney general yesterday from john dÜrer who is conducting an investigation, what is significant into this report? >> john durham statement is extremely. it's extremely rare that he issues a date, he never comes oh talks and speaks about his investigation. so that in itself is amazing. the other thing that is

before i put it under the microscope i do a pretty examination sometimes i use a magnifying glass to determine what type we're dealing with. i've already dug of baytown from the bottom of the bag and as you can see what makes charcoal so special is that unlike wood it's brittle to. break it off it creates these clean edges and i can look at those with my magnifying glass. here for example we have an ash tree. this bag doesn't contain any tropical timber other bags do. when. you swing by the nearest gas station to pick up a bag of charcoal of course you have no idea how far it has traveled already and what ecological footprint it has left behind. the entire forests are being cut down in countries like nigeria or in eastern europe and sometimes even protected forests are being plundered when that has an immense impact on the ecosystem or biodiversity and on the climate overall we need to act. we care we have 3 cats. here we have a product that we're looking at. you know yes. this is pure charcoal. here we have a different product with the slogan for the sake of the environment it's a b

examine. too many people in africa charcoal is a necessary energy source in europe it's central to the grill culture. efficient production and sustainable forestry can make charcoal a renewable resource only the combined efforts of governments businesses and consumers can stop the destruction of our tropical forests. quite as soon as it's sick. to understand the world better we need to take a closer look at. the experience knowledge to. leave. out of the comfort zone. into the crisis on faith or director milorad doesn't shy away from human suffering he demands an incredible amount from both his actors his holiness the artist activist prices for your milorad on meet the artists. 60 minutes. to know that 77 percent. are younger than 16. cuts me into me. and you know what external voice is part. of the subject to 7 percent we talk about the issues. this is where we cut. the 77 percent this weekend on d w. odd. place. blame . news live from berlin burning out of control bushfires in australia comb

you had a recent piece in "the washington examiner." you point out that the 2020 impeachment schedule will give one presidential candidate a leg up in terms of campaigning time. talk to us about what you mean. >> well, there are six senators running for president, and they will be tied up with impeachment hearings, and if the -- it seems like there'll probably be a senate trial around the time of the first primary contest in iowa and new hampshire, and at the same time mayor pete buttigieg is about to leave his office as mayor of south bend, indiana, and be able to campaign full-time on the campaign trail, so not only is he surging right now, but he might be able to surge a little bit more if he can have a heavier campaign schedule right at this crucial point before the iowa caucuses and scoop up some more support that way. so -- and while all the senators are tied up in washington d.c. he's going to be able to be campaigning on the campaign trail. the flip side to that is a lot of focus will probably be on the impeachment trial in wash

>> let me say, we examine for this. we examine filing. >> thank you. people listen more carefully if you think we examine for this. >> typically we examine for this. and have been examined for it and i would encourage people to look at the comment letters that will eventually become available publicly. >> i divide this problem into a number of categories. first is politics, mostly in terms of your commission, mostly through that part of the problem but there are a couple of other problems. one is we have to develop instruments and processes that work across platforms and across the planet so that when you're doing disclosures you are comparing apples to apples. but the other part of this is whether or not you as an agency are leading versus sort of waiting for gcfd and others and seeing how things play out. so in the kind of, in the ecosystem that's working on this come would you consider the sec a leader or a follower or a participant? where do you put yourself in this? >> definitely a participant. and i would say a leader to that decision useful lens

>> well, he had an opportunity for a couple weeks before the american people, as we examine the evidence, to be serious, and you know, really drive to the heart of this case. and instead, he spent most of his time going after chairman schiff and making false accusations against chairman schiff. and now it looks like he was the fact witness. he was asking chairman schiff, you know, to recuse himself, when all along, he had phone calls with an indicted ukrainian american. he was talking to rudy giuliani at the time that ambassador yovanovitch was being smeared and then cleared of her duties. and there was no effort to find the truth. this was just more efforts by devin nunes to protect the president. >> should he in your view pull himself out of all future business on intel going forward until this is resolved? >> you know, brian, he's so

eastern on c-span, we'll show you a hearing on examining the future of iraq and president trump's request for military and civilian aid for that country. at 9:00 p.m. eastern on c-span2, testimony from sec chair jay clayton on oversight issues and his agency, and at 8:00 p.m. on c-span3, a discussion on privatized military housing with representatives from the housing companies. >>> next, testimony from treasury secretary steve mnuchin on the u.s. economy and financial stability. he also talks about digital currency, world bank lending and the potential impact of climate change. >>> the tcommittee will come to order. without objection the chair is authorized to declare recess of the commit at any time. this hearing is entitled promoting stability, reviewing the administration's deregulatory approach to financial stability. i want to inform all concerned that this meeting will end at 1:00 p.m. per the request of the secretary. i now recognize myself for four minutes to give an opening statement. so let me welcome back secretary mnuchin. today we're here to discuss the trump administration'

, notjust quite extraordinary and it does need careful examination, not just as quite extraordinary andhow much worse that properly trained and with proper understandings of the expectations on this. it is crucial to the whole honours process the personal data is handled sensitively and clearly something has gone seriously wrong here. it is... iain duncan smith described it as a disaster. how dangerous could it be in terms of all these people, the celebrities, politicians and so on whose addresses have been made public? it's not good for anybody‘s personal details to be released in this way but there were included in that list police and security personnel where there are potentially serious ramifications and i'm sure they are being looked at now in considerable detail but that is a significant issue in its own right so it's not just the famous people, it is the people who won't be known and should not be known truthfully. what could have gone wrong? you mentioned not very well trained staff because this is, as you say, something that happens every year. you would say it's very well oil

it just worth examination. this is where i end up in the chapter to contract that was a way that is absolutely impossible for any woman to even be likable where you could murder a bunch of people and you are a charisma king and the judge that his sentencing you to death is like you would have made a great lawyer, wish i could have had you in my office. and the 35% of people that said they just find male candidates unlikable. >> host: because we haven't fully humanized when there is no comprehension of why anybody would have that kind of the position. meanwhile, as far as anything can be objective, donald trump is the most unlikable human being that has perhaps ever lived. and there is no hand wringing about that. certainly the republicans were not like this guy is unlikable. i'm getting off track. i think that it is instructive maybe it feels like a way of contrast but it's to look at the ways that the benefit of the document are afforded and the amount of generosity that we extend to not just the mediocre but

david kendall and president's clinton's lawyer got to examine ken star. adam schiff is the most important fact witness. >> well, they're going to want to know when he talked to the whistleblower. >> he didn't talk to the whistleblower. >> if his staff talked the whistleblower. what did he know about this before it all became public? >> he has not said that under

it's a comprehensive examination. medics look for sore throats, inflamed ears, abnormalities in the hearts and lungs. or malfunctioning joints. taipei city started sending doctors and nurses a year ago. the local government is covering the cost. the city government issues a health handbook for each child. the handbook means they can get vaccinated just like other children in taiwan. part of handbook is translated into indonesian. it's a valuable resource for the mothers, but it hasn't solved all the health problems. >> translator: there is not enough space for all the children at harmony home. dishes have to be shared and that makes it easier for infections to develop. some children develop bronchitis or o other respiratory diseases. other children havave skin problems. these conditions require immediate attention from doctors, sometimes hospital treatment. wewe share inforormation with t home t to help improve hygiene therere. >> in order to improve this situation, the city government has made harmony home an offer.

i think there has to be an examination of how our present services work and crucially what happens to them on release from prison. two people, including 25—year—old jack merritt, were killed in the attack by a man who had beenjailed in 2012 for his role in an al-qaeda inspired plot. former wales rugby captain gareth thomas says he wants breaking the stigma around hiv to be his "everlasting legacy" in an interview with prince harry to mark world aids day. we know there's a hell of a lot to do, but what you have managed to do in the space ofjust six or eight weeks has been transformational. pro—democracy protesters in hong kong march towards the american consulate to thank washington for its support for their movement. joe root returns to form in new zealand, hitting an unbeaten century, as england edge themselves back into the second test on day three in hamilton. and talking movies celebrates its 20th anniversary by travelling to mumbai for a bollywood special. the prime minister has promised tougher sentences for violent offenders following the attack on london bridge on friday. mini