more than one example, maybe 10 examples of a piece made over several years, researchers can compare the differences in how these pieces were made, look at examples of changes, nuances, how the technology was improved over time. dr. murphy was more than a collector. these are choice pieces in great condition, all original parts. he assembles them with the purpose and he actually wrote several books. he devoted his energy to writing books after his retirement. he was a leading force in the field of scholarship and he opened up a lot of doors and shared information with scholars who are interested in this and now we can benefit from that by having them at the museum. ofs museum has a wide number visitors with a range of interests, so we tried to present a collection that will appeal to all types of visitors. those who are interested in the they will find interesting. those who are interested in rifles, they will be ecstatic to see these pieces in one place. you are hard-pressed to find that. but we also want to appeal to the general public, so we put out other examples of artifacts rel

>> that's a perfect example. it's everything from soda machine to medical devices to the thermos on the wall to the light center to road centers. it goes into connecting to vehicle communications, et cetera. it expands and eventually gets everything. you have the next level of the internet of things and then we get really scared. >> so we are going to talk about what this means for government specifically because a lot of the connected roads, wouldn't it be awesome if you came up to a stoplight and could automatically go through. all of those things are the types of things we talk about. we will start off talking about how internet of things is waving government project today. coming up right now is to no-caps there, vice president of the information technology and innovation foundation and director of the center for data innovation. thrilled to have him here. [applause] >> good morning, everyone. it's a pleasure to be here. i want to think the organizer, scott lou, for putting this together. my name is daniel ca

here's an example of technology used to detect gunfire, in in washington d.c. there's about 300 sensors around the city. this is put out by the washington post, the dark area is where there have been the most shots, which is surprisingly large number of gunfire in d.c. one interesting thing is in 2011 the white house was hit by gunfire. it was discovered that there was a bullet in the white house, the question is why did the city that has all of these shots fired sensors, why did this not protect? the answer is nobody thought to put the sensors around the white house or around the high-income areas of washington d.c. so it was never measured. so the technology that was available was never put in this area. we need to talk about collaboration coronation. one interesting question for government right now, especially his staff himself why didn't we create it? if you think about it the problem over try to solve, matching passengers to drivers was really a tax problem was something that cities and states knew they had, their familiar with rolling out technology and

for example, if i were to call infor example, if i were to call it -- it's probably much less evocativehe paypal network" would be the way i would call it. i think it probably started six to 12 months after the ebay acquisition. emily: linkedin, tesla, youtube, will yelp, yammer, and spacex. and all founded by members and of the paypal "mafia." reid: yeah. emily: what was special about all of you? what did you have in common? reid: paypal collected a whole bunch of people who were young, and intense, and were and entrepreneurial themselves. then, all of a sudden, it was bought by ebay. so a bunch of these folks were like, ok, well then, what do i in a do next? and so -- you know, chad and steve go in to youtube, elon in goes and does tesla and and spacex, jeremy and russ do yelp, and i do linkedin. you yelp, and i do linkedin. and yet, because we've had this intense experience together, we all have still really tight and network. so we are calling each other going, 'hey, i'm thinking about doing this, what do you think?' emily: who do you call for what? youemily: who do you call for wha

i've given you my password example already. you're familiar with many of the efforts to deal with this the counter measures are a long history. we know that we tried barriers in training but we had fundamental problems with these. they leak very badly. the screening and anti-virals, you're familiar with the set of issues associated with that, dependency on preexisting signatures. the way the anti-virals lag the attacks. the way in which many of them actually import vulnerabilities themselves and can be used as bases for exploits. we have done a lot of hunting for vulnerabilities. nice to see the rise of that effort. i think, as i show you in a second, produced some benefit. so is active defense. but that monitoring the situation and the like yields also limited benefits. we can create enclaves and encrypt to greater degrees, very useful kind of thing. again information needs to be shared. soon as we get into the sharing we get into all kinds of vulnerabilities that are described and inherent software vulnerabilities that may ex

for example, the french abandoned us. as long as the frenchmen remain in our lands, we promise you not to go elsewhere. what's the upshot of that? >> just move from point a to point b. >> they can move and they can have demands on the french. they want a consistent relationship. you can't just come and go. you got to come and stay. they're asking for an ongoing relationship with the french that will be equal in value or predictability to what they can do with the british in hudson bay. they're moving the french. yes, we would love to be your friends but here's what we expect from you. there's a negotiation going on there. on 296, they say we'll keep quiet as he desires and let the sioux do the same. the herd is still sore on account of your son. that's what i was talking about before. as part of this french expansion of the interior, this movement of trading relationships, some french people don't come back. it's a dangerous operation. what makes it great to be a man dant or visit the man dant? >> they have an impressive

armed forces is a good example.in his book talks about this at some length where people feel they have a mission like an air traffic controller. government employees are productive and hard-working as anyone in the private sector. the social security agency had a reputation or a long time as being a high morale agency. people distributing social security checks have a strong sense of a mission. all the things you mentioned go back to my point about some regulations are okay. there are functions of government that i want to perform very well. i would argue that where it hasn't done the best job is where it's been the most core functions. jared was happened is it's acquired incrementally over time additional functions which are not core where the government screws up pretty badly. >> host: my second was this idea of government dysfunction. >> guest: there was a good article published a couple of days ago where you have the identical education plan and you tell democrats this is a republican plan or democratic land and

here are a few examples. in chattanooga out allergy sufferers can know where the pollock count is high and this will look at pollen and also smaller particles and transfer that information to cell phone so residents know where to go or were not to go. another project is in chicago and that is to track human activity and weather. it's a large consortium in chicago that basically let users know where to walk and were not to walk in terms of what pollution levels are, as well as down the road looking at traffic and digestion. the massive set of sensors that have been the point that the city and will be used increasingly. another example is in portland, this is a great case of optimizing traffic. it uses predictive analytics to compare auto traffic versus bus traffic versus the pedestrian traffic, it they've been able to get a head start on the patient before they're there. in cincinnati they've been focused on water management by having real-time sensors and they can help minimize the potential of floods and pol

that is just an example. therefore, i am very inclined to push this problem within washington to reach of the relevant departments. enthusiasty much an about longer-term research and development in this arena. i have sketched why it is that i think the problems are inherent in the technology, but there are opportunities in terms of making encryption easier to use, something we had just talked about here, in terms of the use of formal languages to scale of our capabilities to provide more protection and the basic design of our systems with the security focus would yield, i think, a lot more benefit. so, for example, i am the former secretary of the navy, so i say as the navy develops its next generation of submarine or destroyer, let's make it a national goal to say how will i design the system so as to reduce this -- the vulnerability, minimize the amount of poison fruit it consumes, maximize my use of analog and out of bound systems, maximize my use of formal language protection and key junctures, etc.. when

emily: give me an apple example. >> i want something that's stretchable. i want stretchable electronics. you ever try to put a bandage over your elbow? it better be stretchable. there's an example of something where, you know, in medicine you want to measure -- you want to find out how you're healing and you want to basically see if this has grossly affect and you want it continually monitored. we're working on stretchable electronics as well as especially when it's connected to the human body. >> this is $170 million partnership. what are your deliverables? >> deliverables is to create a road map of technology and find out where all the gaps are this preventing things being manufactured. we go out and put out a proposal. we get all these companies working on those gaps in the technology. so eventually two to three years from now there will be a much more complete ecosystem and people be manufacturing these things in much my higher volume. emily: dr. malcolm thompson head -- we'll con tech continue to follow the secretary going on to linked in after this a

ane song of the lark" as example. this is the first printing. has an original autograph and inscription from willa cather from october 19, 1919. so we have these early editions of this book. we actually have about 35 copies of "song of the lark" from its earliest publication in 1915 through present-day publication. looking at our shelves come even see how the dust jackets have changed. and also, you can kind of see how the readership has changed. a lot of times it will come in with notes from readers. in some cases, notes from the author. this one, for example is by will cather. this was the property of mabel white. she donated this book to our collection after she had sent a letter to willa cather asking about her signature in books. this is the letter that will cather wrote back to her explaining why that's difficult to do. one of the reasons why this room is so important is that we are a public archive. so anyone can do research. it is close stacks. which means that our staff has to retrieve materials, but they are available to anyone. we can

with the social security be an example? >> guest: i'm referring to their victory over - regular suspects into some of the other agencies and all of the cabinet offices have some element of the regular - >> host: he could end - couldn't remember the name that is the kind of the same sentiment? >> guest: what is the regulatory state to complete the font? the education department does a lot of things that are not involved in the regulation but also does a lot of things in the country. this is what you have to do if you want to get federal funding. the regulatory state is with all of the executive branch. under two and i want the listeners to be quite clear on this some regulations are okay because it advances the public goods. the epa is fulfilling the constitutionally appropriate functions insofar as if you have a smokestack so i'm not against regulations that prohibit that would prescribe safe tunnels and coal mines although some of my friends would argue that. there are regulations which are the low hanging fruit and are go

reid: google, for example. when i talk to eric schmidt.t's like, no, no, actually we normally think about these as three to five year -- they weren't using the word tour of duty -- but like three to five year stints, where the person actually learns a job, achieves something significant, proves himself at the end of the job, and then goes on to do something else. ebay focuses a lot on how do we bring the relationships of all the folks who have graduated from ebay and paypal together. and they have the external network tied in. but even, for example, places like ge, all right, in terms of what they used to do -- and they still do -- for executive rotation. but also, how do you then groom all kinds of stars to be an executive at this, you know, huge industrial conglomerate? emily: what does silicon valley get that other industries don't yet? reid: silicon valley understands that r&d is not just -- like, we hole up in our lab and we invent something, and then -- then, 'tada! there it is.' that actually being present and active in what is goin

they are grouped in this together as new example of the old way of doing things -- in this example ofhe old way of doing these -- things. they are contrasted with the new way of doing things. represented by woodrow wilson, who is the champion of the common man. and the film actually ends with a plea for people to send one dollar to the democratic national committee on behalf of of the woodrow wilson campaign because woodrow wilson is for the common man, the republicans are for the wealthiest 1%. have notthough strokes changed in the last 100 years. we have 1.4 million items in the collection. there are plenty of treasures out there to be discovered. and the great thing is with new technology that we have, not only the ability to preserve these older films on film stock, but we have a lot more technology available to digitize the film and make them available for people. we have known about the film. now have ways of getting it out there for people to see. film we first sound have featuring a president is calvin coolidge talking about economic policy. it is not the most scintillating fi

this is one of his best example of crosscutting against action. so, you have sisters who are trapped in their house. there are burglars trying to get at them. and people on the way to rescue them. cuts back andth forth between all this competing action. you see the girls, the burglars, you see the people coming to the rescue, all culminating in a wonderful rescue at the end. i'm sorry if i spoiled the ending for anybody. but this is just one of the most prominent examples of the d.w. griffith film that we have in our collection. ♪ griffith actually started in the theater. was like a lot of people from the theater in those days, was reluctant to get into motion picture films, because he thought it was beneath him. but he went to work for biograph and started as an actor, saw some promise in films. was also going to get paid a little bit of money for being a director. and eventually discovered this is something he was quite good at. he's responsible for bringing us mary pickford, another stage actor, who came to work in the films. she worked at biog

as an example of the old way of doing things. and so, he's got lots of money, and he is dispensing favors. and there is all sorts of bribes and political corruption taking on. they were contrasted with the new way of doing things, represented by woodrow wilson, who's the champion of the common man. the film ends with a plea for people to send $1.00 to the democratic national committee on behalf of the woodrow wilson campaign, because woodrow wilson is for the common man. republicans are for the wealthiest 1%. somehow, those tropes have not changed in the last 100 years. we have 1.4 million items in the collection. so there are plenty of treasures out there to be discovered. and the great thing is with new technology that we have, not only the ability to preserve these older films on newer film stock, but we have a lot more technology available to digitize the film and make them available for people. so, we have known about the film. now we have ways of getting it out there for people to see. [no audio] mr. mashon: the very first

one of the examples that i have here comes from 1904. this is a series of films that was shot by the american utoscope and -- m biograph company. part of a series called the westinghouse works. this was shot for the 1904 world's fair in st. louis. there were roughly 29 films. that were produced for this series, of which 21 survived in the paper print collection. so, this chronicles several factories that were owned by westinghouse. this one is called the panorama, the machine company aisle. beautiful, beautiful film that was taken from an overhead crane. that was moving along a track there in the factory and showing people below on the factory floor doing their work. wonderful, amazing record of what american industry looks like at this particular time. and so, these films were incredibly popular when they were shown in 1904 in st. louis. they had special screenings for the westinghouse employees, and pittsburgh. and so, you will see these films used a lot in documentaries. these films were commissioned by westinghouse. they were paid fo

armed forces is a good example of that. james james t wilson in his book bureaucracy talks about this where people feel, air other people government government employees are not as hard working or anything is in the private sector. the social security agency had a reputation as a high morale agency because people there who are distributing social security checks had a strong sense of mission. that's what they are doing. if you look at the things you mentioned, go back to i guess my point about sub regulations are okay. i'm. i'm not an anarchist, their functions of government that perform very well, i would argue that where it has done the best job is in its morose core functions and what is happened as it has acquired, incrementally over time, this, this vast additional number of functions which are not core and where the government screws up pretty badly. guest: this. host: the second point was this idea of government dysfunction and strategist. host. guest: there is a really good article where he had and i debacle educati

there is a problem, for example, with university internships.n't know how many diversity in terms of work for -- entrance work for free, not directly, but for the exhibitions that happened in the city. the second problem is the problem of the relationship between the exhibition and the city. so we're speaking of the very famous -- how it works as the venetian version. basically, this 100 or so events that you have in town pay very high rent to be here in town. -- to who this money goes they go to the pockets of the landlords of the city. it goes to the pockets of real estate, owners and actors in the city. that is why we see a paradox. we're trying to intervene within contradictions, by creating an alternative model of the pavilion, for example, in which is basically the city and the people working for the city which takes advantage of an event like the biennale in which the labor is fairly paid. this is only one examples of what we do. say, -- re speaking at the venice biennale. this is democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report

so the pawnees are another example of these communities. and what characterized -- what tends to happen to communities when they can grow a lot of food. thanksgiving is just the perfect preparation for this. they are very sluggish. can't move quickly, and their population grows. one thing you get is the pawnee and other towns of people like this are often really big. hundreds or even thousands of people living in these fortified substantial villages or towns along the tributaries of the mississippi and missouri. it's a new style of life at least from what had been there before this -- before 700. these villages aren't just growing corn. they're alsohunting buffalo. they are often making stuff, involved in handicraft and basic production. they start getting horses. the spanish see some of these and the spanish and french continue to see them. these big towns out on the plains. that's one big sort of feature of the plains at this time. there's another big feature of the plains. this is what makes the plains an exciting and dramatic place in t

one great example. give us one as well. >> i personally feel that the work is on the offenders themselves. >>> two quick examples. someone solitary confinement. that was the focus of my testimony. there are examples of states that have dramatically reduced solitary confinement without causing risk to staff and inmates. good example is colorado. in 2011 colorado placed a solitary confinement, about 7% of its incarcerated population. today it's about 1%. we've seen a dramatic decrease in the use of solitary by banning the use of solitary against some populations, like people with serious mental illness and by restricting the number of days to be sent. the second example is bail reform. what we've done in new jersey and what other states and some municipalities are looking at, in new jersey, we have 10,000 people sit in jail for awaiting their trial because they couldn't afford a few thousand dollars in bail. we have completely revamped that system where now, your bail, whether you're going to be released

for example what lessons can we learn? today, august the 13th is the fourth anniversary of the kidnapping or the abduction are the hostagetaking of a u.s. contractor who was kidnapped by al qaeda in pakistan and the united states try to rescue him and another hostage from italy unfortunately were killed. so this actually happened in 2011, in other words four years ago and what kind of lessons can we learn from that and also i would like to mention that elsewhere for example in spain on august 13, 1997, this is the 18th anniversary that a spanish politician blanca and we do have some people who are experts on spain, he was kidnapped and shot. i think we have to remember this as well. it's not only the americans and a hustonians that there are many others and we will have to deal with that. the point i'm making is we really need a new approach so to speak to deal with hostages in terms of placing priority rather than another statistic. there is a saying in judaism and islam and christianity that if you save one life, it seem

because if the scenarios we raise the anti-and for example, that's why mentioned, for example, even thelone wolf, but we know that isis and their strategic thinking and al-qaeda as well, and by the way, it's really the anniversary of the declaration of war by the al-qaeda against the united states going all the way back, and it seems to me when we think about the future, we cannot discuss individuals or groups of people but entire nations. that is to say the escalation to the weapons of mass destruction, biological, chemical, radiological, even a dirty bomb to hold entire nations hostage. and think of the demands. how are you going to do with the? >> i think we can exaggerate many threats. i thought taken the weapons of mass destruction argument after the end of the soviet union as a disaster that probably a is not going to happen for any number of reasons. that's one of the things i believe is really more a function of movies and literature of fiction and reality. that's one of things are not really worried about. what i'm most worried about is that we lack the strategic approach. we d

that is an example of something. want to find out how you are feeling and want to see if something is infected and want to continuously monitor it. we're working on stretchable electronics, especially when it is connected to the human body. emily: what are your deliverables, in 30 seconds? >> are deliverable is to create a roadmap of technology and find out where all the gaps are that are preventing things being manufactured. we go out and put out a proposal and we get all these companies working on those gaps. now,ually 2-3 years from there will be a much more complete ecosystem and people will be manufacturing these things in much higher volume. emily: dr. malcolm thompson, head of the new tech alliance in silicon valley. thank you so much for joining us. as soon as he gets out of his meeting with the defense secretary, we will have that for you guys on monday. we will continue to follow the secretary on linkedin as he continues to rebuild this bridge between the pentagon and silicon valley. matt: what an incredibl

have, forse, you example, a french soldier in the war to saying "no one shall pass." germany has taken part of france but will not take any more territory. it'sin these images here, actually french soldiers leaping straight out of paris in order to go and confront germany on the western front. there were a lot of memoirs written about the combat experience of the first world war. and one of the most popular in "under fire" in which he recounts his combat experience. praises theny, he combat experience as a heroic. more on thech trauma of combat, the ways in which it is not glorious. how it's traumatic for the combatants. what is interesting with these authors is that they come after combat, but the experience as men are living it is not widely circulated during the war. frenchre's, with the case, the german case, with the crowds gathering before the keiser, there is the sense that all political differences need to be set aside. a sacredlls this union. in germany, the keiser says i know longer see political parties. all i see are germans. the idea being that united we

so give us an example. i know you've been thinking about something. >> i think that playing music is much like talking. so if i think of you... about something. let's say, "maria love music." i pick up my three notes i want to work with. ♪ maria maria love music ♪ maria love music maria love music. ♪ so that's nice. we've got a nice idea there, right? we have a subject, we have a verb. >> hinojosa: you got me singing, that's amazing. >> yeah, you'll see. wait a minute. we have subject, we have a noun, we have a verb, we have an action there-- you love the music. now, what do we do? we leave more space. you can't talk all the time. you have to leave space, right? ♪ maria love music... >> hinojosa: ♪ maria loves... ♪ >> ♪ ...music. now we're going to put the chords... the chord is sort of like your clothes. you know, so we've got... we make a piece now. >> hinojosa: ♪ maria loves music maria loves music... ♪ >> (continues harmonizing theme) so we have a thing. now we can talk about that. maria... i'm going to

for example cyber security. but on balance we believe that digital financial transactions offer enormous advantages in terms of alliance for financial security, efficiency, cost sufficiency, access locations and so on. so as those services become more common we believe that that will have a positive feedback cycle with respect to promoting financial inclusion. third, geography generally matters less than policy legal and regulatory changes. that said we still observe some regional trends. for example, as i mentioned a moment ago you see mobile money being much more common in places that lack as much of a traditional banking infrastructure whereas in places with more extensive infrastructure you see mobile money playing less of a central role and banking correspondents playing a more central role. fourth, coor coordination among key players in the space is really important. clearly if you're looking at something like mobile money that impacts the telecommunications industry but it also impacts banks and ministrie

so if, for example, and i'll take an example from them. one of their successful production lines is the fagor. f-a-g-o-r. it's fairly well-known in europe and around the world. it produces washing machines, appliances like that. and the fagor washing machine company has suffered from the international crisis like everybody else, and so the demand for these washing machines has fallen. so they had about 2,500 workers in the town of mondragon, at this factory, and they couldn't use 600 or 700 of them that just--there wasn't a demand for it. so the question is, what do you do? and they have a two-step answer. first answer: "we are going to share the pain." in other words, if you don't need 600 or 700 workers, the other way of saying that is "you don't need as many hours of labor because there's no point in producing the machines you can't sell." but the question is, why would you want to impose the need to cut back on an all-or-nothing basis? why would a person either be employed or unemployed? because if what you want is x-hundred hours less

good example of that.ng to jill's point in terms of contracting and new innovative finance mechanisms and contracting, from your country they spoke at the conference yesterday and actually challenging faith-based health care delivery systems. to formalize and strengthen their mechanisms. in fact he kind of challenged them to say the mous you have are not worth the paper they're written on. and pushing people towards more contracting. on faith side i think it's up to us to step up to offer more robust collective organizations that bring us together in larger scale so we can deal as collective bodies not just small institutions with governments so they can achieve the scaleable objectives in terms of development. those are some thoughts. >> thank you. and andrew there was one more question for you between differences of

for example, women who operate unmanned aerial drones are allowed to deploy in theater but 99 infantry units. they're only allowed to stay back with artillery units. there is still even amongst the most advanced countries in overcoming these hurdles, hurdles still remain. so it's a little bit naive to think that all these issues are going to go away immediately in part because a lot of these developments are tactically driven. and so i'm very excited that came up as a point of conversation. my own research deals primarily with irregular armed groups, rebel groups, et cetera. insurgencies. and what we've seen is that a lot of the developments in developing world military, so for example the sri lankan military formed an all women's unit in response to the high levels of female participation in the tamil insurgency in sri lanka. so the degree to which these developments are being externally driven from our engagement in conflicts like iraq and afghanistan versus internally driven through changes in american culture or perceptions of the role of women in the workforce is something i'd lik

is that a fair example? same question overdue. >> there was an event here in april with frank hendel. he is the under secretary and he went first. i asked him, how did you evaluate the strength of the american acquisition system today? he said it was pretty good, we make the best weapons of the world. i say it's at least a b+ or an a-. he gave a lot of, obviously he's pushing reform and i'm not saying he's complacent, but he thought we were doing pretty well. then same question later and he said i agree with secretary for major platforms but i don't think that we do very well with electronics wherever morris law is relevant and adaptive software is relevant. in that kind of thing we need the reform that jim was talking about earlier. i'm blending here and paraphrasing but to put the question to you, it is it fair were hearing a couple different things, this is a period of rapid innovation in some sectors and should be even faster. you're also talking about ongoing improvements in propulsion that you've been

but just give us one good example. could be in the correctional system, it could be before, it could be after release, do you think we ought to really drill down and try our best to emulate. thank you, missker man. >> thank you, senator carper. i currently teach nonfiction writing in two state prisons in ohio and one is a men's medium security prison it. was built for 14 someone men and currently houses 2600 men. it is led by a young warden who was trained as a social worker at osu. he does things differently than ever prison i've step foot inside. the prison has more lifers than any other prison in the state of ohio. it has -- it is one of two prisons with the lowest violence rate in that prison. so that is a big change over time in that facility. that warden and his predecessors have done a great job of making that a much safer prison. and that warden has and his staff have a tremendous amount of rehabilitation programming of every sort, whether it is vocation vocational, educational or spiritual. one of the programs

the second example is bail reform. what we've done in new jersey and what other states are looking at -- we had 10,000 people sit in jail awaiting their trial because they cannot afford a few thousand dollars in bail. we have completely revamped that system. now, your bail is determined by your risk assessment and not whether you are a poor or rich. that change will lead to three quarters of the 10,000 fewer people sitting in jail. before this reform, the average time a person sat in jail awaiting their trial with 314 days. people presumed innocent until proven guilty being treated like guilty. this is a phenomenon all over the country. this is one of the ways we can dramatically reduce our jail population in the united states. senator carper: i talked about moral imperative we have in this country -- we also have a fiscal imperative. the deficit is still substantial. hence the need to find out what is working, do more of that, find out what is not working and do less of that. >> you mentioned my name -- i said that ja

right now the examples i gave you. >> what is keeping you from the examples?s came out in july. >> at this point the gao has neither given recommendations. we've asked in terms of can we understand how you did this. they believe they are protecting sources. >> the gentleman's time has expired. thank you, mr. chairman. and thank you madam secretary. with regard to the gao question just received the gaming system that process at the rand annulment on under the very beginnings of the affordable care at or an issue in which you get more information. >> at this point a number of gates and efforts on program integrity and plays an information gathering when that goes through when we don't have data matching would review those cases and take action. at the point of the filing of taxes and examples given, folks didn't file taxes. that the next ways that would occur in the next will in terms of people who chose not to file taxes for some reason. that is the point subsidies will go away. we have a number of gates in place. if we understand that they are working we do wo

anywhere youth may sort of gather, school is the big example. finally developing civic and voter education messaging that appeal to you. so think of radio shows or comic books that appeal to youth, we've done done song contest, we've done electoral caravans that sort of get out the vote and kind of a party on the street kind of thing. that's the way we specifically reach out to you. >> not to. >> i think the electoral caravans were done sort of as election day was getting very close and it was done in hand them with more set substantive voter education. the goal and i think they were quite appreciative and quite visible, the goal in the drc the day of the election could be a pretty tense day. there may be fears that there might be incidences of violence of the idea was to create a festive atmosphere or promote a festive atmosphere right before the elections to help get out the vote. >> thank you. >> i want to make one quick comment about the need for a radicalization and the level of violent extremism in different countries. it's worth noting th

so the example of having more independent objective analysis. so if there was more flexibility to the planners to meet their objectives subject to the constraints and so long that it would be more opportunity for them to have the flexibility that otherwise too much intervention in the decisions is blocking. >> first it is the mission oriented agencies that may provide the hint of where this could go with more focus on the actual delivered capabilities. i would also note in the defense courses, there have been successful experiment that the cia ventured that's built on speed and in fact influencing other agencies and the private sector so i think so much has been spent and so much has been attested in the military history that it's almost like the answers are within the military system. >> the answer is starting to very in the reform for the department of defense in april and the undersecretary of defense i asked him how well do you think we are doing a. it's so the u.s. army and the italian space and. at the cost overruns and delays are sometime

water quality for example and a number of environmental issues but there are other factors explaining the possibility of having such a plan now. the price of energy generated by renewable, wind and solar energy in particular, has so much decreased that it makes such a plan where the contribution of coal is reduced in the future easier to afford. the plan as president obama explains will lead to a decrease in the cost to american consumers on their energy bills on the order of $85 a year. to a large extent, it comes from the decrease in price of renewable energy over the last 10 to 20 years. laura: we have a big paris summit at the end of the. are you hopefully deal will be signed and do you think the other polluters in the world will come on board? guest: last november, the u.s. and china signed together a common declaration saying they want to really lay their role in paris and reduce emissions. china is also moving. many countries are moving, and china is moving because of air pollution concerns. it's not only climate change. they understood burning so much coal as they do not only

i've got a ton of examples. some of them seem harmless. the parents who call to wake their kid up in college, want to and do call the professor to contest a grade. but i think the most damaging, the most egregious examples, are actually the parents who are so certain that they know best what that child should study and become in life that they've actually constructed that child's path. >> so the child has no room to develop basic skills? >> well, exactly. they're not developing -- >> needed skills. >> right. in childhood when mom and dad are planning out the path and constructing every moment, every afternoon. the activities, the enrichment, so on. the child ends up not learning kind of the basic things that life used to teach children. how to pitch in around the house, how to take care of themselves, how to take public transportation, manage their own deadlines. in college when parents are certain they know best, the kids' choices for what they can study are restricted. and they end up feeling, i'm not on a path of my own making. i may be

the radio example is one example that is real. and the idea there is that we can come to the field with systems that are inherently adaptable. most of that adaptation right now we see occurring in the software base. you can build systems that characterize the environment, understand how they can operate in different configurations and optimize their configuration in realtime. but you could think about taking that same kind of design pattern and asking, is the limiting factor on the performance of the system an algorithm or configuration, or might it be, again to the radio example, might it be the antenna we're actually using? that was designed much earlier. if it is the limiting factor, then we can look to things like potentially additive manufacturing to be able to rapidly prototype, potentially even in field situations, alternatives that we could then integrate into the system and allow the cognitive processing to figure out how to better exploit a more tailored version, for example, of that antenna. >> so this sounds like a rea

people said, for example, john wayne was really great at playing john wayne. and his movies, it's not a realistic movie. it's a realistic movie about a john wayne kind of hero and what would have happened, had he been there, if it was managed in a way that hollywood created it. when i teach a film, they are students of film and have been taught to analyze film. they see the movie in quite a different way than someone who is just watching it in 1944, or somebody who was watching it in 1964. each of the audiences changes the movie itself. when "patton" came out many people believed it showed an anti-warfield. they used that as

and i'll give you an example. if you had to do a word cloud right now of what was on the panel, you'd have lgbt rights, twitter with the, economic disparity, less big. so we have trend lines going that are not good and part of that is our dysfunctional leadership. what are you guys going to do that's different? >> well, is the question how are we going to solve inequality or how are we going to do it differently? >> if you had to define -- personally i think income inequality and class stratification and lack of upward mobility is going to kill this country. we're not going to become a social democracy like europe. we're going to have to figure this out. so if you do premise that that is the challenge, what do you see your generation doing that other generations, xoers, baby boomers, or what. >> i don't know if that's the core challenge everybody in this demographic is working to solve and i think as we've highlighted everybody has different challenges that they think about and you know i have friends for the last

we don't know that the examples of the gao are more than the examples that you are talking about. when we get to recommendations we may know that. at this point we don't. so we are trying to do program integrity. but we want to make sure if there are individuals because many people, we don't have the right information but still may be eligible. pleat let us know about those samples. >> ms. wilson. >> i ask unanimous consent that the office of the assistant secretary for planning and evaluations research brief showing that increases in cost sharing can discourage low income individuals from assessing necessary medical care which can have negative health consequences be entered into the record. >> without objection. >> second burwell, thank you so much for being here today and for working with florida, especially and headstart and elder care and all of the other things that you do. i appreciate your testimony on how obama care is working for the american people. and i call it obama cares because i believe that obama cares about the people of this nation. and that's why we have this

here he has collected the most amazing examples that will offer even in the most miserable readers excellent company. after the reading there will be time for questions. afterwards the book signing. when that time comes we would like everyone to form a line going up that way now ladies and gentlemen please give a warm welcome for author michael farquhar. [applause] >> i don't create a bad day but it's farquhar. thank you all for being here. that was a nice introduction ended as deeply and cap slate with this book is all about. created 65 of the more miserable and unpleasant days in history, one for every day of the year but one of the things that was important to us is that we did not do uber miserable. we are not covering national disasters. we are trying to focus more on the quirky disturbing but not hideous aspects of human nature so you won't be reading about the holocaust or anything like that although i will save there is a bad day for nazi propagandists. goebbels would be wrote in his diary about his sore feet and everybody thinks he is and he has no friends so boo-hoo to him and that