existing rphy: that's law. dr. malcolm: that's existing lawn. existing rphy: that's law. this speaks to part of our disagreement. he very notion of expressing what the penalty is for violating the law equals a very tion, that's different reading of our set of that many of tes us have come to understand. recitation of the existing penalty. applied lm: when you it, the whole lot of people who are not at the moment under the law are going to be and will that penalty, i think it's important. senator murphy: so let's get implication. thank you very much, attorney general strange for being here today. you used strong words in referring to the president's executive order. being an about it unwarranted assault on the second amendment. i think this is where we get own to a question of the words on the page versus your perceived intention. and maybe we can see that it's a for us to icult understand what sits in the of the and minds individuals who write laws and write guidance. so we're left first with the page.on the so maybe just share with me five key hese sort of points that ar

to follow up on your question whether there's an existence of a doubt. the florida supreme court clearly decided these existed at the post conviction opinion which led to the resentencing opinion that is now on opinion here. >> was there ever an florida supreme court reversing? >> for a death sentence. >> for an improper instruction to the advisory jury. >> i would surprised if there weren't, your honor. i don't know. i'll look at that. getting back to the admission. the evidence was clear, there was no question that there was a robbery here. there's no question that this was heinous, atrocious, and cruel, and we would ask that the court affirm the florida supreme court's judgment. >> thank you, counsel. mr. waxman, six minutes. >> notwithstanding this flurry of papers, i'm aspiring not to use the six minutes. let me first -- let me go right to justice scalia's question which is not a hypothetical. although i'm happy to answer hypotheticals. your question was was the jury told and doesn't a jury have to be told that as to death eligibility, the element o

and you have read the existing law, but the president announced that he wanted to change the existing law. >> i read you the executive action. ms. malcolm: ok, but the president announced that he wanted to include people, the sun -- the so-called gun show loophole. >> he wants to include right protected in the law, but he wants to do about executive order. ms. malcolm: yes. mr. baden: let's look at what this is aimed at, these people who have emerged to sell thousands of firearms while they have another job. in the meantime, they may not have a store, but they have business cards and maybe they are fine -- selling these firearms and they are clearly in the business. that is why they have not defined a certain number of who is in the business and who is not, so people who should not be captured, the widow who is trying to sell her husband guns, would not be captured with this. senator: i think a lot of us agree that we want to keep guns away from people who have mental health problems, criminals and terrorists, but we want to protect the rights of gun owners under the second amendment.

pen tracing for now there is recess lighting the existing structure will be used to support the grid and the artwork the asian art museum has been working with a e the structural engineers 0 it doesn't compromises the existing structure of the building this is a dynamicic cross section for the existing channels that supports the frame that will in turn support the grid with an 8 inch space between the grid and surrounding walls. the artwork will be lit with the led lighting the led lights

. -- statutory aggravator exists. i submit even if that was not the case, in light of a 150 year history of states, either felony murder or premeditation, that combining those two elements did not satisfy the death penalty -- none of that is here. this is a question of the six and eighth amendment. no state ever has said that the jury can just decide some muddle of aggravation. they don't agree on a specific element. i think that would violate the sixth and eighth amendment precedent. >> i would think just the opposite. the necessity of finding the element of the crime goes all the way back into the mists of history. this necessity of finding and aggravating factor, we made it up, right? that's just recent supreme court law. if either one of them should be satisfied able to buy finding -- should be satisfiable by finding the generic conclusion rather than agreeing upon the particular species and issue, i would think it's the latter rather than the former. >> justice scalia, i'm reminded of your separate opinion, i thi

this is not clarifying existing law. this would prohibit them from their second amendment right not based on due process, but only on the fact that they request a family member or friend to assist them with their finances. i am concerned with your department's final ruling with the adjudication of those being a mental defective to more broadly cover folks who seek treatment. i am concerned because these were not changed through congress and you cover that with the upcoming social security rule, what are we going to have? please tell me what your department's plans are, what is the social security administration planning to do and who will be entered in based solely on social security records? ms. lynch: thank you. the current gun control act is prohibited individuals who have been adjudicated in certain ways regarding mental health of possessing firearms. federal agencies are required to submit information about individuals who fall into those categories -- the social security administration is beginning a process of see

pen tracing for now there is recess lighting the existing structure will be used to support the grid and the artwork the asian art museum has been working with a e the structural engineers 0 it doesn't compromises the existing structure of the building this is a dynamicic cross section for the existing channels that supports the frame that will in turn support the grid with an 8 inch space between the grid and surrounding walls. the artwork will be lit with the led lighting the led lights

my it requires the review of existing regulations in need of repeal. under the review of process, it prioritizes those processes with those were an economic burden. it requires recommendations on regulatory repeal to be presented to congress for approval. if congress gives the ok, repeal must happen. republicans and democrats support eliminating the cost of unnecessary regulation to help economic recovery. the scrub act is a mechanism to achieve this combole goal. i urge passage of this and i yield back. the chair: the gentleman from illinois reveals. the chair recognizes the gentleman from maryland. mr. cummings: i yield myself such time as i may consume. n closing, and i would say that, you know, members on both sides -- on the other side talk about the cost of regulations and i think we always have to keep in mind there is a reason for regulations. sadly in many instances, there have been abuses where the public's health, safety is a concern and we have to make sure that we have the balance. and i think president obama has done a lot in that regard.

this is another existing law and. this is a simple explanation about what existing course authorities said to interpret the law. to the extent a lot of the objections may be over a 15-point, let me ask you to state clearly for the record, this fifth point on your page if key point is simply a recitation of existing court interpretations of the underlying law. nothing in the is a new statement of law that simply summarizes what existing court has found relative to who is required to have a license. that is correct, senator. currently, there is a difference of opinion, different interpretations by different court as to the interpretation of that law. >> that is correct. and that those who are trying to determine whether they fall under the law or not, the existing court precedent to be confusing or sometimes hard to track down. >> yes, it is. it is often hard to track down. it is a lot to ask in every citizen to do a nexus search of medical research in determining what they have said about how they are operating. what o

exist. i can't believe what you walked out with. >> it does exist. we walked out with seven high powered rifles, we weren't asked for i.d., we didn't fill out tonight paperwork. for someone to say it doesn't exist, that's proof that it exists. what the question is, is this actually going to make any difference whatsoever with what obama is trying to take place. >> you're talking about president obama's new executive order. will that stop these types of purchases if someone wanted to buy these types of weapons? >> not really. all it's really going to do is, more narrow the loophole than really close it. because he can't really enforce closing it completely without congress. and so what's going to happen is he's just putting in more stricter rules to make sure that people abide by the law that's already there. so somebody who is licensed as a licensed dealer does this for profit will really have to make sure they are really following rules. they're not going and saying, this is from my private

certainly not clarifying existing law. this would prohibit them from the constitutional second amendment right, not based on theprocess, but only due to fact that they request a family member or a friend to assist them and i am concerned with your department's final ruling this would be say adjudicated as a mental defective and would be referred to a mental institution. more broadly, high-caliber folks that would be seeking treatment. now, you couple this with an upcoming social security rule. what are we going to have? please tell me what your department's plans are here. is the social security administration planning to do and who would be entered into this program is based solely on the social security records? ms. lynch: senator, thank you for raising that important issue. as you know, the gun control act looks at individuals who have been adjudicated in certain ways in regards to mental health and firearms, and currently, under current federal law, senators -- certifiers are required to enter adjudications. also secur

more units that currently allowed under existing. in [inaudible] court case in nappy county affordable unit providing a inclusionary ordinance qualify frd density bonus. at the same time a number of other housing initiatives were happening, including the mayors housing working group, work on the housing element and prop k which stated 33 percent of now housing is affordable. this pushed staff to push the housing bonus program to deliver more affordable units in san francisco without subsidies. the state law is quite broad in the scope chblt it allows a gerp maximum of 35 percent increase in density as well as up to 3 incentives from the zoning code to make a project financially feasible. the program complywise the requirements the state law while tayloring it to the housing program and context of san francisco. realize the state law would yield a max [inaudible] provide up to 30 percent on site affordability which alinels with prop k goals. as i stated before, the state law developers up to 3 incentives which are necessary to increas

reviewed the sites documents and first-hand knowledge of the design and detailing the vast majority of existing framing will remain intact to accumulate the promoted construction with proper reenforcement i've looked at the floor plans and exhibit 1 of the canter's response and find it accurately represents the demolition it has the seismically separation as the san francisco planning department and the proposed foundation 90 to not expose or undermine the foundation of the property and the details cited will be knitted in an addendum to the san francisco department of building inspection for review as general contractor i see those projects all the time on a daily basis. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi my name is bridget i'm before me notice sister a couple of things to say i want to say bruno and susan are really wanting to work with everybody and the community and certainly, of course, their neighbors the appellants they've made amuse accommodations to address the concern around their roof decks and, yes frankly not anything that enough that's why we see appeal after

pen tracing for now there is recess lighting the existing structure will be used to support the grid and the artwork the asian art museum has been working with a e the structural engineers 0 it doesn't compromises the existing structure of the building this is a dynamicic cross section for the existing channels that supports the frame that will in turn support the grid with an 8 inch space between the grid and surrounding walls. the artwork will be lit with the led lighting the led lights on a track fixed to a one and a half by one nature aluminum tubbing the tubbing will be medicare fattens to a custom frame that rests on the ledge the steel frame will not be medicare toishld by relies on felicity to protect the fabric of the building that's it thank you very much >> thank you commissioners is that the conclusion our presentation yeah. >> are there any questions for the presenters seeing none, we will open up for public comment i have a speaker card from linda lee. >> my name is a linda lay a person of the art museum and the person for asian society for a support group i'm speaking

pen tracing for now there is recess lighting the existing structure will be used to support the grid and the artwork the asian art museum has been working with a e the structural engineers 0 it doesn't compromises the existing structure of the building this is a dynamicic cross section for the existing channels that supports the frame that will in turn support the grid with an 8 inch space between the grid and surrounding walls. the artwork will be lit with the led lighting the led lights on a track fixed to a one and a half by one nature aluminum tubbing the tubbing will be medicare fattens to a custom frame that rests on the ledge the steel frame will not be medicare toishld by relies on felicity to protect the fabric of the building that's it thank you very much >> thank you commissioners is that the conclusion our presentation yeah. >> are there any questions for the presenters seeing none, we will open up for public comment i have a speaker card from linda lee. >> my name is a linda lay a person of the art museum and the person for asian society for a support group i'm speaking

community the existing character existing culture and a clear prosper for the neighborhood the interim controls are thank you very much have a nice day. >> is there any additional public comment? >> thank you, commissioners commissioner johns and steve for mary cell first of all, it was interesting that the list of projects that the interim controls was handed out with one correction only two projects left on that list where you're not already already having discretionary hearings for those projects the disburses or interim controls are unnecessarily every one of the projects will be coming to for fda approval it will be ignite position to take into consideration when o you hear those projects already i do want to commend the staff for making the distinction between medium sized projects and larger projects this is burdensome a money is 50 to $70,000 it is not have to do an additional use but part of lp a process and want to support the suggestion that was made by claude i didn't that projects that are considering a land dedication be disbursement from the landing at least 33 percent a

lot 20/20 existing lots for the width and less than the riders minimum we'll hear if the appellant 7inutes. >> good evening board members i'm here i'm with the property owners i want to give you a short goggled this thing gentleman purchased his property in 2006 and a ended up since then under 9 hope one point an extra wide lot to be able to build anything on it over and over the last proposal to split the lot vpdz i'd like to precede finding by finding as to our points on each the findings from mr. sanchez number one on his first statement he mentions that the lot is in pattern with the existing lots actually want to show you the block map and actually, the prominent lot size is 25 percent by one hundred dwooe square feet not 44 which is a double lot and in fact, that lot being a corner lot this lot size will be reduced 17 feet if you do do math that lots would be now 3 thousand 200 and 80 square feet only 200 and plus square feet be able to if you comply with the lot width it will be allowed to be two separate lots always want to point out another reason to separate the properties

you know to single-family above so we were able to get 5 hundred square feet but in keeping the existing house twlrs windows up front but once you go back slightly you're into the hill so in terms of making it burn that we would on this be digging further into the hillside. >> there was a house down the street i held up a year ago by duncan i believe at 82 ord court was a magnifies i don't know if the neighborhood knows it dwarfs to the next door but a smaller small studio units that went with that one my understanding i understand is sold and it was to me desirable you know you've got constraints on the lot i completely understand that i think you can adding the second unit and getting action on the desirable i think the legislation really was to from supervisor wiener was really he says not sold in the housing crisis i'm cynical are we adding to housing stock i would be supportive of the project if you have something that kind of went into the reliance of a code compliant of 3 thousand one hundred square feet the neighbors are calling for if you want to create a second units that to me

the master bedroom and the property to the north and finally the decision to rebuild - >> of the existing cottage and the replacement thought that deep into the block than otherwise would be the general accepted setback of the 4 floor is 15 feet from the 4 floor were moved forward approximately 7 and a half feet not leave room for the fourth floor roof deck that will not have privacy issues in closing the neighbors realize and, sir unfortunately your time is up. >> you have a 2 men rebuttal at the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr n rebuttalt the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr in rebutta at the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr n rebuttal at the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr un rebuttal at the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr tn rebuttal at the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr en rebuttal at the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr rebuttal at the ends. >> calling the speakers that are in support of dr requester. >> you're in suppo

it is understood in the same sense we would allow the project sponsor to utilize existing studies to answer those questions maybe coming before them as far as housing production production of affordable housing they don't have to do their own easement this comes up and as far as displacement pressures again that is pretty conceptually or conjectural i don't know why they'll have to have a story their displacing people the study by the ted egan kind of talks about that all right. that's understood in the motion they'll not have to produce those things and let's see i think everything else was fine can i ask mr. - sir answer me from there 15 months is that going to work for you guys? >> i'll borrow from someone else's statements you don't i can't remember but the short time but we don't have it, too short 12 or 15 i think it could create a process. >> i'll tend to be supportive of 15 presumably that is mission 2020 in place by the time and give them more time i think i'm in support the only thing i'll ask has nothing to do with with that particular thing although a basis for the afford

formula retail use or the parents of on existing formula retail use and number 2 there are 3 or more other retail establishment in operation anywhere in the world 3 global warming then this process kicks in and 3 that the retail establishment maintains 3 or more the features as defined by the planning department and planning commission for the standardized color scheme and uniform apparel and sniej a trademark or serve mark since the time we introduced this in july of last year, we've had further input on a number of issues that i'm planning to introduce some amendment language and one that coming out came out of the members of the working group is the concern about yet another will that we're trying to close that where some trying to gain the system or the talent process might try to like that. >> in as what we call that slip in as individual so as a result we're drafting an amendment so that if addressing the possibility of formula retail business are vetting the definition by an affiliated person i believe the owner the business defining the type of ownership but hope to have that

pen tracing for now there is recess lighting the existing structure will be used to support the grid and the artwork the asian art museum has been working with a e the structural engineers 0 it doesn't compromises the existing structure of the building this is a dynamicic cross section for the existing channels that supports the frame that will in turn support the grid with an 8 inch space between the grid and surrounding walls. the artwork will be lit with the led lighting the led lights on a track fixed to a one and a half by one nature aluminum tubbing the tubbing will be medicare fattens to a custom frame that rests on the ledge the steel frame will not be medicare toishld by relies on felicity to protect the fabric of the building that's it thank you very much >> thank you commissioners is that the conclusion our presentation yeah. >> are there any questions for the presenters seeing none, we will open up for public comment i have a speaker card from linda lee. >> my name is a linda lay a person of the art museum and the person for asian society for a support group i'm speaking

community the existing character existing culture and a clear prosper for the neighborhood the interim controls are thank you very much have a nice day. >> is there any additional public comment? >> thank you, commissioners commissioner johns and steve for mary cell first of all, it was interesting that the list of projects that the interim controls was handed out with one correction only two projects left on that list where you're not already already having discretionary hearings for those projects the disburses or interim controls are unnecessarily every one of the projects will be coming to for fda approval it will be ignite position to take into consideration when o you hear those projects already i do want to commend the staff for making the distinction between medium sized projects and larger projects this is burdensome a money is 50 to $70,000 it is not have to do an additional use but part of lp a process and want to support the suggestion that was made by claude i didn't that projects that are considering a land dedication be disbursement from the landing at least 33 percent a

the president announced he wants to it change the existing law. >> i did not read the existing law, i read the actual ticket of action. dr. malcolm: ok. but the president announced he wants to include the so-called gun show loophole -- >> he wants to include rights protected in the law by executive order. may i finish? let's look at what this is actually aimed at. it is aimed at people who have emerged, especially with the internet, to sell thousands of firearms, while they are maybe a used car salesman. in the meantime, they may not have a store, but they have business cards and they may be selling firearms in existing packages. they are clearly in the business. that is why they have not defined to delineate who is in a certain number to delineate who is in the business and who is not. who shouldn't be captured are not like the widow who is trying to sell her whoand's guns, or someone wants to upgrade, would not be captured. senator shelby: i think a lot of us would agree we want to keep guns out of the hands of people with mental health issues, criminals, terrorists and everything e

please are t ded i f was not a fee the counter fee was an existing fee and employed with the mission bay setting this period has run and after 2011 that fee politics with the increases as an increased fee this is not one of the types of of the fees comfort women that conflicts with that plan the redevelopments plan nop a is the imposition of the city regulations they'll materially increase the cost of experience with the plan $6 million is a material increase. >> thank you counselor. >> thank you. we'll hear in ocii now. >> we're going to hear in dbi my apologies. >> even appealed against dbi we'll have mr. morales speak from ocii as you may know 9 things from $6 million plus of the t d i f have been retired to dbi thank you. >> commissioner honpresident honda appendixes is the in the course of the trial agency to the redevelopment agency even though the redevelopment agency was desolved ocii has retained all the land use authority in order to enforce enforceable obligation the state has deemed to be still in effect and survive the disillusion of the redevelopment agency that are thi

there was no, there was this code that doesn't exist today because our doesn't exist and, therefore, the need to pretend it doesn't exist. and for that reason it's just unimaginable to us. but at that time it was so ritualized its automatic ticket i think frankly that there were duels because there was an advocate of dueling. it was a process for doing that nobody would have thought let's go have a duel to settle this. we'll shoot each other at 10 paces. no. they knew that this was done and, therefore, it was done. and i think this happens where it's sort of a cold situation more largely a culture buys into the notion, and any other time with any other group of people come it would be utterly bizarre. and today and it seemed as an inevitable as the sunrise. [applause] >> thank you. >> thank you very much. thank all of you. to our copies of the book is like to purchase want up front, and you'll be glad to sign them for you. and again we welcome you to come up and take a look at the letters we have up here. and begin if you want to become a member, the our brochures out in front. thank

formula retail use or the parents of on existing formula retail use and number 2 there are 3 or more other retail establishment in operation anywhere in the world 3 global warming then this process kicks in and 3 that the retail establishment maintains 3 or more the features as defined by the planning department and planning commission for the standardized color scheme and uniform apparel and sniej a trademark or serve mark since the time we introduced this in july of last year, we've had further input on a number of issues that i'm planning to introduce some amendment language and one that coming out came out of the members of the working group is the concern about yet another will that we're trying to close that where some trying to gain the system or the talent process might try to like that. >> in as what we call that slip in as individual so as a result we're drafting an amendment so that if addressing the possibility of formula retail business are vetting the definition by an affiliated person i believe the owner the business defining the type of ownership but hope to have that

it exists and it will continue to exist like this and things like this will enflame that. what we have to realize is that we have a very strong relationship with saudi arabia. it is, as you said, victor, on a very thin line. it's nuanced but we have to maintain that type of base, that type of relationship, trying to improve the trust that exists. as we realize now, also, we're trying to get this nuclear deal through with tehran, which the world has not completely embraced. so this is a very delicate dance that this administration is putting on now. >> general, we see the u.s. playing this down but more protests are planned today. do you think it could be the start of a bigger conflict in the region between the two rivals? >> probably not. i see this as an unfortunate step within this relationship that exists. riyadh will abide no protests. riyadh is all about control. when you look -- they've been in the region. they understand the region better than anyone. they lifted the arab spring. clearly there is no spring in the arab spring. it has descended in many places into com

they say it does not exist, but it should exist. and in that sense, their policy is not aligned with their preference for the outcome of the palestinian state. this is the one issue where we're beginning to see a breaking of rank with the traditional paradigm that negotiations should determine the emergence of a palestinian state, most notably sweden but before that, iceland and then the vatican and now grease that have directly recognized the state of palestine as existing now. and this is a line that has been in the past preserved. many western countries have offered the palestinians the trappings of a state, recognizing representatives as ambassadors but never recognizing palestine as a state that exists. it appears to be changing, as more and more countries are being looking to align their policy with preference and to say, since our preference is for the emergence of a palestinian state, we will actually recognize it as existing now. on the issue of borders, what is happening there is what i call essentially an overshooting. al

my advice would be under the laws that existed. >> he said that exist today?took yes >> >> let me strike that and restated. we stated. i will state that the prevailing law at this point is the ordinance that was enacted both on interim and on the permanent basis. i am not prepared deal with all of the other issues, the over arching ones, as raised by the permit applicant that may have impacted the particular action. therefore, it's my intent to vote to hold the denial to allow the permit applicant to exhaust its administrative remedy. >> i would support the direction of commissioner fung, especially with the evidence that there are signs out there that absolutely, the sanchez sign, even though it was called to everyone's attention is still up. they're still collecting rent on it and therefore it they are breaching the law. so, i would find with that example is similar direction. >> i also agree that there's no further comments, would you like me, your motion commissioner fung >> move to deny the appeal of old apartment on the permit denials. >> that they confo

>> if the agreement exists and they can prove that it exists, which is going to be the more difficultvercome, then, yes, everyone should stand by it. if bill cosby relied upon a promise by the prosecutor and therefore gave up his fifth amendment right to not self incriminate, absolutely everyone should be bound by that agreement. the question is, though, bill if you're making such an important agreement, i mean this agreement would have been the most vital thing to the criminal case and the civil case, the idea that it was not put into writing writiny lawyers who spend their days protecting their butts and putting things into writing is absolutely inconceivable to me. >> i'm going to hold you on this, heather, because you're an attorney and attorneys pick their words very wisely. you said they should have to respect this agreement. do they have to respect it or it's just the right thing to do? >> bill there's nothing black and white in law. you would expect the judge to say, yes, the state is bound by the prosecutor's promise to bill cosby and his attorneys, but first that promise has

my advice would be under the laws that existed. >> he said that exist today?took yes >> >> let me strike that and restated. we stated. i will state that the prevailing law at this point is the ordinance that was enacted both on interim and on the permanent basis. i am not prepared deal with all of the other issues, the over arching ones, as raised by the permit applicant that may have impacted the particular action. therefore, it's my intent to vote to hold the denial to allow the permit applicant to exhaust its administrative remedy. >> i would support the direction of commissioner fung, especially with the evidence that there are signs out there that absolutely, the sanchez sign, even though it was called to everyone's attention is still up. they're still collecting rent on it and therefore it they are breaching the law. so, i would find with that example is similar direction. >> i also agree that there's no further comments, would you like me, your motion commissioner fung >> move to deny the appeal of old apartment on the permit denials. >> that they confo

see ourmurphy: what i existing court cases that are public record. what of that, is intentionally vague, such as terminating? >> if all they wanted to do was apply the laws existing today, they would have to say anything. senator murphy: what is vague question mark -- a bank? -- vague? >> when you were discussing circuitters -- entrances for it since. we have people who live in the circuit who do think of themselves as dealers and who recognize what the law is an come to understand it. now you're introducing at the national level a new threat of enforcement that there would not be any need for, if the law was not going to change. what are they to think? bear to think that something has now -- a bear to think something somethinge to think has now changed. i just want to go back to the wall that you are familiar with for the record. as applied to a dealer in firearms, as defined in section 921, a person who devotes time, attention, or labor to dealing firearms as a regular course of trade or business, with the principal objective and livelihood of purc

and 29 existing litigation pacific gas & electric thirty existing litigation pacific gas & electricnd 31 existing litigation pacific gas & electric and 32 will not be heard. >> thank you. any public comment on closed session items if so i'm going to ask you to indulge me a tiny bits. >> back to our right back to the 3 minute rule. >> right. >> excuse me. are you commenting on something. >> a future closed session item that's the best to justify this i was down in our coffee shop in the wonderful puc building and noticed the coffee is closing at 4 o'clock but for you have a lot of employees that work until 7 o'clock i'll encourage you i think that is a closed session to work with your contractor to not short you're staff and the public and leave that coffee shop open longer and not keep reigning in to 5 o'clock that's silly. >> may i have a motion to insert this privilege. >> second. >> a >> >>session. >> so we're back in open session took action on item 24 and no further action beyond that can i have a motion whether or not to disclose. >> >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? o

customers, grandfathering in existing customers. critics are working to allow you to have a say in all of this come november. 's two nevadans need the choice. it should be up to nevada to decide if they want to create their own power the solar or stay with energy. >> a new alliance, filed a referendum position monday morning. supporters say they need 55,000 signatures by march to get a question before voters this if successful, they are hoping to overturn the rate change decision. >> what that will do is turn the net metering rolls back to what they were before sp 374 was passed. >> reporter: kevin is a new officer. this is a committee called me know solar tax pack. than others say this decision is hurting them. >> after the five year incremental changes to the rate structure, it will be cheaper and more cost-effective for me to pull the solar off my house. >> reporter: he said he not only lost his job in the solar industry, but he will need to replace part of his roof when he is forced to tear down his panels. he said he will be fo