is there any room for diplomacy at this point will ask well siniora fellow at the foreign policy institute at john hopkins university in. libya is once again heading for a full scale civil war with prospects of national reconciliation put on hold as shots ring out around the beleaguered nation's capital with the un powerless to stop the fighting and its peacemaking process halted by the violence is there still hope for a peaceful unification of libya's warring factions is libya headed into years and years of destruction fighting all the offensive on the capital swiftly put an end to the country's anarchy and chaos. well sonera fellow foreign policy. john hopkins university welcome to the show it's great to have you with us. so. while haas star apparently expected a quick. as a victory in tripoli it looks like the offensive is getting bogged down in the suburbs after militias from misrata showing jna forces after is apparently keen on keep fighting but can he really win now that the momentum is gone i don't see him winning to be honest i think he underestimated the kind of resistance he's g

our bad points has settled well samir fellow at the foreign policy institute at john hopkins university discussing of the ongoing fighting in libya so the g.m.a. hast incorporated various militias part of its security force and then and there there have been reports that they don't just fight hofstra but they're also fighting each other every now and then so even if that you're in a manages to throw back after sources can still rely on those militias loyal to choose. now that's a very important question you asked sophia and nobody knows. where we're from either side wins this conflict there are those militias that follow him or are there for with the government in this case. what role they are going to play in the future i think there is a very strong possibilities for the tripoli government that it can control d.s. militias after this episode because they have to some extent with very active support of the united nation have succeeded over the last year. to control a lot of these militias and incorporate them as regular army officers. we haven't seen a lot of fighting in tripoli as it

what they foreign policy institute at john hopkins university discussing the crisis in libya and the future of the war torn country that's it for this edition of the enco all see you next. my body told me i belong with the board if my thoughts my mind with and along with the girls. to be of any particular. person's doctor. i was born a male had a sex change when i was thirty years old. i've now been living as a woman for twenty eight years and i fully regret this. problem should have gone away from by now but they hadn't so these surgeries are nothing more than plastic surgery i've had several female to male friends and you look at it and you just go god you paid for that it's horrible nobody can change genders is impossible. is delusional it's a mental illness. or one of mine from flesh or from my flesh she shall be called woman because she was taken from. facebook and google started with a great idea and. ideals unfortunately there was also a very dark so. they are constructing a profile of you and that profile is real it's detailed and it never goes away turns out that google is m

the foreign policy institute at john hopkins university. once again heading for food. with prospects of national reconciliation put on hold as shots ring out around the beleaguered nation's capital with the un powerless to stop the fighting and its peacemaking process hosted by the boiler. called for a peaceful unification of libya's warring factions libya and. destructive fighting. swiftly put an end to the country's. well sonera fellow at the foreign policy institute and john hopkins university welcome to the show it's great to have you with us. so. while house star apparently expected a quick and decisive victory in tripoli it looks like the offensive is getting bogged down in the suburbs after militias from misrata showing jna forces apparently cain fighting but can he really win now that the momentum is gone. i don't see him winning to be honest i think he underestimated the kind of resistance he's going to face. and their resistance is not just from misrata i mean he pretty much is a rallying cry across the entire western part of libya from xin than from misrata

a senior fellow at the foreign policy institute at john hopkins university he's joining us live from washington d.c. . there is of course a very fluid situation happening in trip to tripoli right now this is all coming just weeks before a supposed peace conference what do you make of the timing of half those assaults. it is because i believe it's because of the peace conference i think that it wants to dictate terms and wants to. impose his will not only militarily in libya but also on any political process in the future and he has always tried to do that over the years and i think sadly. and the international community over the last two or three days have not taken the strong stand that they should take in terms of naming him directly as a spoiler to political process something they have promised over the years over and over again in all of their press releases all of the u.n. meetings and i think they're with that they send a signal to other armed militias in libya that it's ok to use guns to impose a political will so what do you suppose the un is doing that do you think the inter

, editor of the official journal of johns hopkins sites and flagship publication of the foreign policy institution. it's been the goal of the foreign policy institute here at sais to search for realistic answers to international issues facing the united states and the world today. now, as attested to by today's turnout we are here to talk about one of the most consequential issues facing the united states and the world today, the ongoing trade conflict with china and china's changing role in the international financial system. china's evolving role in global trade is helping every corner of the united states economy. in my home state of nebraska which i tend to think of as being as far away as possible as you can get from all of this in d.c., they suffered close to $1 billion in economic damage that's been attributed to the ongoing trade conflict with china alone. so this issue is wide-ranging, very complicated and incredibly consequential to the united states today. thankfully, we are about to hear from someone who knows far more about this issue than i do. dr. john lipsky is a fellow of the fore

let's get more on that keeping us company have it all go well he's a senior fellow at the foreign policy institute at john hopkins university he joins us from washington have it all go well the optics the timing of this why is some if i have to doing this now there has been a period of calm up to this week. i think as as many have observed before there are a number of reasons for that one is that he feared that this u.n. conference that was planned for the fourteenth of april missed sidelight him and sort of establish a whole new process for libya which many actually. move toward the civilian government and civilian institutions that are then military and we subjugate him to civilian rule second issues i think his backers even though they are now dissed in trying to distance themselves from him like the u.a.e. . have decided or wanted to sort of try to. end the game in libya even by military means and out of fear of what's also happening in other parts of north africa in general i mean especially allegedly a somewhat sedan i think and as many have observed over the years and documentation of the u

warlord khalifa haftar we've got half an hour to talk about it now a senior fellow at the foreign policy institute at johns hopkins on skype from washington we thank you for your time well my pleasure thank you it really is an interesting development and i'm wondering how much of a turnaround do you think this is is this just donald trump saying something going against what his administration has or do you think it's a complete sort of reversal in in administration policy. i don't think it's a complete reversal i think it is one of those from. baghdad. to trump fashion in which he contradicts the policy over his own state department. security council and the u.s. military. statement was not really clear as to what it really did. it came about five days after. it actually happened and nobody seems to know about it i can assure you from my own private sources that tuesday last week a senior employee at a presenting mr. and the tripoli government was in the white house and heard from national security officials and they confirmed for him at that time the u.s. government still backs the internationall

mike thanks very much let's talk now to have it all go well he's a senior fellow at the foreign policy institute at john hopkins university he joins us from washington if it all go well the u.n. secretary general antonio ters beyond his message of let's have a little bit of deescalation here what can he bring to the table. i don't think much he declared yesterday a very clearly and categorically that his. number one priority is to prevent conflict and that's why he is shuttling between tripoli and benghazi but that also gives a certain kind of weight to general huffed who is using very clearly military means to try to manipulate himself into the political settlement in libya and to impose his will i think giving him a larger role in this is not a very wise move and this is really what led us to today because the international community and many european countries and arab countries have treated him as. a major player in libya which he is to some extent but not to the extent that heads of states are meeting with him and monarchies i think that is what in boulder to him that's what made him think

mike thanks very much let's talk now to have it all go well he's a senior fellow at the foreign policy institute at johns hopkins he joins us from washington mr i'll go well welcome back to the news here on al-jazeera what do you think only for half times the strategy is here. i think as others have pointed out it is to try to secure a position for himself in the political process and to pressure board the united united nation and the libyan government in tripoli into submission to his demands which is basically to be. the absolute military order he has refused over the last few years to subjugate the military to civilian rule and he has always maintained that he wants to maintain independence and to be as a sort of apparel power a libyan to you and what i think is really important to note here is that the united nation and the international community has given him more power and legitimacy yesterday and today including the fact that the u.n. secretary went to meet him and give him that legitimacy the fact that if the security council does not strongly condemn him by name and followed through wi

>> well, i was walkingn my hometown of philadelphia to a think tank called the foreign policy research institute. and i was reporting out on study i had commissioned about russia's systematic subversion of the west, as well as the combination of new military capabilities that we had seen in the annexation of crimea and tho invasiukraine. and my phone rang, and it was a 202 number and it was the deputy chief of staf the white house saying, "can you go to mar-a-lago tomorrow to interview?" >> is that a little ironic? >> [ laughs ] it is. i mean, of course, it was a colete surprise to me to b considered for the job even, but, of course, i was gratefule for portunity, having studied the importance of that position and having, at least from a historical perspective, an understanding of how a naonal security adviser an the national security council staff should support a president and an administration. >> you are an army general. you retired as a three-star. but for three decades, you i servthe army. you also went to valley forge military academy and also west point. >> right. >> where was it in your

melinda haring is the editor of ukraine alert at the atlanta council and a fellow at the foreign policy research institute she joins me now from washington and i just want to pick up on the point that jonah was making that we have now the comedian the wild card counter that religion is a lansky he is in a strong position having won the first round but does it mean that he's going to do as well in the runoff vote absolutely not so the first round is actually over performed he took about thirty percent and that's several points higher than most people expected but he also may have been a protest vote and we don't know how people are going to vote in the second round when it's really serious when you're going to end up with a real president. he's unconventional he's had a sudden rise to prominence in this election is that enough clarity on what he would do if he becomes president on his manifesto on his policies. so your reporter is right that his policies are very unclear he's never held office before but the fact that he has someone like alexander donny look the former finance minister says a lot about him

he's also a distinguished research fellow at the foreign policy research institute. happens to have written a book on this subject, messing with the enemy, surviving in a social media world of hackers, terrorists, russians and fake news." and frank figluzzi joins us. on the upside of your donald trump you finally have at least an acting chief of staff who's going to allow you be you in this job even though this team is playing with house money and ignoring the rigor of protecting and defending elections. >> that's true, and this is the president's third chief of staff and he's sort of accepted the idea you cannot control this president, and he's going to do what he's going to do. and that's why we're seeing president trump -- what's interesting is that people thought when the mueller report finally came out and it was ultimately an embarrassing result for the president but a positive one in that he wasn't facing any criminal liability. we might see a president who could finally move on after this two year cloud had hung over his presidency, and be a bit more relaxed

now a senior fellow at the foreign policy research institute.nd back with us a former federal prosecutor from the u.s. attorney's office in washington. gentlemen, welcome to you both. and clint, just as a primer here we are living both in a tv and internet age. there will be questions and members of the subcommittee tomorrow who will want their moment. do you think the attorney general can very effectively shut it down and give a blanket statement that says you can ask me any which way you want, i ain't going to talk about it until it's released. >> i think he can probably do that. and i'm somewhat sympathetic to him having done a redaction process before, it does take a long time to do that. you want to make sure you get it right because we've seen several mistakes in recent trials now where some things have slipped out. maybe there's this wikileaks connection in the southern trial. so they don't want to make those mistakes. the other part is the classified info. we've already heard some senators, i think senator kenny said people could die. if

foreign policy is thought up and i actually have here in my hand the list of funders of the council on foreign relations the institute that is thinking of u.s. foreign policy they think it up at the council on foreign relations and the cia and the pentagon carry it out and this is like a laundry list of powerful corporations the rockefeller's boeing the carlyle group i mean this is who is writing foreign policy and this is where joe biden is lecturing the world about corruption. was a very good point. if i go as i reckon great report on this keep up the great work go. and we'd love to have you back on a good story but it was great we're looking up this story. always a pleasure. sweden loves wood and scientific theory of the royal institute of technology. and commerce university of technology and the wallenberg woods science center have found a way to create everything from windows to bulletproof vests. from wood by using nanotechnology they were able to extract water which makes up about half of the volume of wood pulp the cellulose fibers of the pulp are what makes trees strong and that can be extracted to create ma

at the relations among the european union, the united states, and china, with foreign-policy scholars at the hudson institute live at noon eastern also here on c-span. 2020 democratic presidential candidate andrew yang held a rally at the lincoln memorial will stop you talked about the impact of automation on manufacturing jobs. his proposal to give americans a 1000 month or two income, and the effects of new tech elegy on the economy. this is 20 minutes. it is incredible to be here with you. how many of you saw the cnn town hall last night? [applause] mr. yang: we get bigger every day and you are early adopters, you discover things early and yang is about to go mainstream. [applause] mr. yang: we are in the shadow of the washington monument, the lincoln memorial, i think near for the first time in eighth grade, how many of you had a trip to washington, d.c. in eighth grade? [applause] mr. yang: the first time you went overnight with your classmates and were nervous and trying to find roommates and prove you have friends. you go to the lincoln memorial and it sinks in, you get it, you get the gravity of what

institute. from 2005-2007 he served under secretary of state condoleezza rice as the director of policy planning at the state department, where he worked on foreign assistance reform and other projects. lastly, condoleezza rice. senior fellow on public policy at the hoover institution. the professor of global business in the graduate school of business. and the professor of political science at stanford. from january of 2005 until 2009, she served as the 66th secretary of state of the united states. she also served as george w. bush's assistant of natural sick -- national security affairs. please join me as this esteemed group comes to the stage. [applause] ms. rice: good afternoon and thank you for joining us. we will have a little discussion here about the subject of this panel, democracy and american foreign policy are hot topic these days. after we have talked for a while, we will invite you to ask questions. i want to remind everybody that i am a professor, i will call on somebody if no one asks a question. get your questions ready. i am delighted to be joined by neil ferguson and stephen krasner for this important discussion. it is one of t

foreign policies dollars the conversation at the hudson institute live at noon eastern, also on c-span -- foreign policy scholars join the conversation. >> the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. >> aske not what your country can do for you. ask what you can do for your country. >> and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon. >> c-span's newest book "the president's." noted historians rank the best and worst chief executives, providing insight into the 44 american presidents through stories gathered by interviews with noted presidential historians. join the live events that shaped our leaders, the challenges they faced, and the legacies they have left behind. willn's "the presidents" be on shelves april 23, but you can preorder a hard copy or e-book today at c-span.org/thepresidents, or wherever books are sold. >> 2020 democratic presidential candidate andrew yang held a rally at the lichen memorial. he talked about the effect of automation on manufacturing jobs. his proposal to give americans a $1000 per month income, and the effects on the economy.

to talk about it, michael o'hanlon, brookings institution foreign policy senior fellow.for joining us. a couple things to go at. reverse order. we found out just earlier today that vladmir putin is going to meet with kim jong-un. he is turning his attention to russia. what should we read into that? >> well over the years russia has been more helpful with north korea than not but we always have to be a little suspicious. vladmir putin has an ideology that makes him want to take the united states down a peg whenever he can. i think that is true even in the trump administration despite the relative friendliness of those two gentlemen with each other. the united states continues to put pressure on putin and russia over various kinds of shenanigans and adventures russia conducted from syria to ukraine. you have to always ask is putin going around our back to try to complicate the situation. on the other hand historically russia has not wanted instability in northeast asia. it has not wanted out and out nuclear proliferation. they approved u.n. sanctions on north korea. after

at the relations among the european union, the united states, and china, with foreign-policy scholars at the hudson institute live at noon eastern also here on c-span. 2020 democratic presidential candidate andrew yang held a rally at the lincoln memorial will stop you talked about the impact of automation on manufacturing jobs. his proposal to give americans a 1000 month or two income, and the effects of new tech elegy on the economy. this is 20 minutes.

on c-span2, secretary of state mike impale discusses foreign policy at an event. at noon, the institute hold a discussion on economic inequality. at 3:00senate gathers p.m. to continue work on executive nominations. at 1:00 p.m. a discussion on the middle east hosted by the center for a new american security. at 3:30 p.m., former vice president joe biden kicks off his presidential campaign with a rally in pittsburgh. later a house veterans affairs committee hearing on how to prevent suicide by military veterans. monday night on the communicators, a conversation on privacy and internet developments. with california consumer privacy act co-author mary stone ross, and daniel from the m.i.t. internet policy research initiative. >> the stakes are higher now because we are talking about deploying automated decision-making capabilities. that is the ability for machines to either assist with decisions about people, or in some paper -- cases, unilaterally make cases. >> i am a lawyer. i have had some a different policy issues, they don't say what information is proactive. we need to have meaning

relationsat among the european union, the united states and china, foreign-policy scholars join the conversation at the hudson institute live at noon eastern also on c-span. live c-span bus is stopping at middle and high schools across the country to present the cries -- the prizes and awards of the winner of our video competition. throughout this month, you can see the top 21 winning entries every morning before washington watch every winning studentcam documentary along with those honorably mentioned in the behind the scene winners online at studentcam.org. announcer: california congressman eric swalwell officially announced his candidacy for president at a rally in dublin, california. the four term congressman talked about his background, campaign initiatives come -- campaign initiatives, and why he is running. after his speech, he was joined onstage by his wife and two children. this is 45 minutes. ♪ ["high hopes" by panic! at the disco playing"] had to have high, high hopes for a living ♪ shooting for the stars when i couldn't make a killing ♪ didn't have a dime but i always had a vision ♪ always had high, high ho

on c-span three and 9:00 the brookings institution looks at how the domestic lyrical climate in the u.s. is affecting foreign policy and national security. up next on c-span, we hear from fbi director christopher wray, followed by president trump and his cabinet talking about investments and other opportunities for economically distressed communities. and, a resolution to end u.s. mili a

c-span3, the brookings institution takes look at how the mystic political climate in foreign is affecting policy and national security. >> watch the american story unfold on american history tv. saturday at 2:00 p.m. eastern on oral histories with an interview of a world war ii novel code talker -- navajo code talker. p.m., rocket girls, the women of nasa's jet propulsion laboratory. this weekend on american history tv on c-span3. next, pentagon officials testifying before a house armed services subcommittee about mismanagement of military family housing. the discuss issues with availability and incentives for private developers who build and manage housing on military bases. this is just under an hour and a half. >> i want to thank my colleagues for joining us here on the day is. i ti

eastern on c-span3 at 9:00, the brookings institution takes a look at how the domestic political climate in the u.s. is affecting foreign policy and national security. watch the american story unfold on american history tv, saturday at 2:00 p.m. eastern on oral histories, with an interview of a world war ii navajo code talkers. sunday at 4:00 p.m. eastern on reel america, looking back at nato's 10th anniversary and at the p.m., rocket girls, women of nasa's jet propulsion laboratory. this week and on c-span3. week, members of the new zealand parliament debated legislation banning most semiautomatic weapons. after less months shooting at two mosques. debate whichat the included references to the national rifle association and gun laws in the u.s. pursuant to the -- >> mr. speaker, i move, that the arms amendment bill be now read a first time.

condoleezza rice joined hoover institution senior fellows stephen krasner and niall ferguson in a conversation analyzing the changing role of u.s. democracy in foreign policy over the past hundred years. an hour and 20 minutes. >> good afternoon, everyone. my name is tom gilligan. join usased to have you as we celebrate the hoover institution 100-year anniversary. we have organized a centennial speaker series. the series includes 11 discussions to showcase the scholarship and research central to the institution mission and values. i would like to welcome you to -- 100st session, titled years of democracy and foreign policy. let me introduce the participants of today's discussion that will address the changing role of democracy in american foreign policy over the last century. niall ferguson. minister to. 2007 he served under secretary of state condoleezza rice in the state department where he worked on foreign assistance reform and projects. and lastly, condoleezza rice. the denny professor of global business in the graduate school of business and the professor of political science at stanford. from january 2005 until 2009 she served as the 66 secretary of

, lindsey graham and doug collins. 9:00, the brookings institution takes a look at how the political climate in the u.s. is affecting foreign-policy policy and national security. month we are hearing winning documentaries where we asked students to answer what it meant to be american. the c-span bus was recently in arizona. here is what people had to say. >> for me it means to be involved, passionate, supportive, and thankful to the veterans and institutions that protect our freedom. >> i am american. i am so proud and what that means to me is i, and -- a former undocumented person came in search of the american dream and was given a path to citizenship as now as an american, i serve americans and arizonans and every dream is possible. that is what it means to be an american to me. can live in a country that allows me any job i want. i can teach diverse students here. i can teach american government. i have choice of freedom to impact students lives. to me it is the fight for social, economic, and environmental justice. unprecedented an turmoil and we need to find and weho are vulnerable need to leave the environment better for ou

around the administration like michael pillsbury of the hudson institute and dodd circle of people who really made it into the american foreign policy they changed the american position on china why do you think to get them merican officialdom so long to actually take a stance on that and to finally consider the consequences they cannot make consequences of the political or geopolitical illusion weights and no brainer right american and chinese economies are so closely intertwined one level would talk of both conflict between the united states and china at another level everybody understands that a really really serious conflict between those two nations would be extremely damaging for the entire world so there sparring a debate does not have to be a conflict there my point is that and i think pillsbury makes it also in his book that the united states could have been more reserved in terms of a transfer in technology in terms of trading with china and i think you're also making the same point in one of your articles you actually called the nixon deal with china the biggest strategic mistake in the foreign policy in living memory tha

around the administration like michael pillsbury of the hudson institute and dodd circle of people who really made it into the american foreign policy they changed the american position on china why do you think it to get them merican officialdom so long to actually take a stance on that and you finally consider the consequences they cannot make consequences of the political or geopolitical illusion waits and no brainer right american and chinese economies are so closely intertwined one level with talk of both conflicts in the united states and china at another level everybody understands that a really really serious conflict between those two nations would be extremely damaging for the entire world so they're aspiring they demand does not have to be a conflict my point is that and i think pillsbury makes it also in his book that the united states could have been more reserved in terms of a transfer in technology in terms of trading with china and i think you're also making the same point in one of your articles you actually called the nixon deal with china the biggest strategic mistake in the foreign policy in living memory that's

institute one of the premier conservative think tanks in town where i was doing wha but every analyst researcher does and that is look into events and try to articulate and fashion u.s. foreign policy in a way that promotes u.s. interest. i never understood that my work at the hudson institute and building various relationships and writing reports and essentially the obama administration didn't agree with with past a strange light over my head in terms of government surveillance. >> host: you mention in the book they did threaten you with foreign agent registration charges and that's what you were referring to the work you did at the hudson institute? >> guest: i'm referring to my professional career that has to do with israel. i've never been involved as an agent for spying or affiliated with the services or their government. i just happened to be a relatively younger person that had high-level connections not only in israel but that the political and military level in various other countries. i never understood quite frankly why the fbi decided that that was a threat, why they decided they had to interview me during my initial interview about this particular issue and subsequent

institutional. some of it has to do with the fact simply that there is more consensus generally speaking on foreign policy about as than there is on on domestic matter no that's certainly true today and most specifically in regard true true russia and always this image of russia as a hostile power is pervasive in the states again for a river ride ever of a sort of complex reasons well professor brown and we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay tuned. if we could only be done to just sit through the fall to do. all sounds simple but just remove you know particular. measure defense and let that play if they don't play well. they are among the group was. to belittle them if you did what you except your then he says and pulls for folks like me to go for the security just hold it where you both put up. with all psycho. closure we're going to produce a. monkey is the. way to the pacific that this was the last stop that the pollution i was fulfill says. just have to get to class as i live eat he did feel confident. find. need. ruhani need. i d. . be done. beyond. a lot of

institutional. some of it has to do with the fact simply that there is more consensus generally speaking on foreign policy matters then there is on on domestic matters no that's certainly true today and most specifically in regard true true russia in a word his image of russia as a hostile power is pervasive in the states again for river riding ever of a sort of complex reasons well professor brown and we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay tuned. because i live the good feel confident. we have learned things and the smiles and this isn't enough for everyone and why some peoples wants to take our things all the power just for themselves and to see whether even. after the previous stage of my career was over everyone wondered what i was going to do next the different clubs on one hand it is logical to go from fields where everything is familiar on the other i wanted a new challenge and the fresh perspective i'm used to suppressing. or not if you think. i'm going to talk about football not for you or else i just think i was going to go. by the way what is it that fl

foreign policy at an event hosted i the hill newspaper. at noon, the cato instituteion on economic inequality. the senate gavels in at three clock p.m. to continue work on executive nominations. on c-span3 at 1:00 p.m., a discussion on syria and the middle east hosted by the center for new american security. former vice president joe biden kicks off his presidential campaign with a rally in pittsburgh. later, a house veterans affairs committee hearing on how to prevent suicide by military veterans. afl-cio president talks about trade, health care, immigration, and the 2020 presidential election in an event hosted by the economic club in washington, d.c. >> can i have your attention, please? we are pleased to have rich trum a briefme give introduction if i could and then we will have a conversation with him. >> can i have your attention,

institutional. some of it has to do with the fact simply that there is more consensus generally speaking on foreign policy matters then there is own on domestic matters you know that's certainly true today and most specifically in regard true true russia in a wish this image of russia as a hostile power is pervasive in the states again for a variety of are of a sort of complex reasons well professor brown and we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments statement. he needs a political impulse needs to come. from. the. ideally dillman before it got into pasta haas been. giving political guidance to the process and so basically what i'm waiting for he's an author political impulse ideally stemming from the moment you. are. welcome back to will's apartment michael brown and professor emeritus of international affairs at the university of pittsburgh professor brennan just before the break we were talking about how. i think there were legitimate upper hand ssion about the kind of flip that secretary clinton could have presented to the world not to that americans but to the world

institutional. some of it has to do with the fact simply that there is more consensus generally speaking on foreign policy about as than there is on on domestic matters now that's certainly true today and most specifically in regard true true russia in a word his image of russia as a hostile power is pervasive in the states again for river ride ever of a sort of complex reasons well professor brown and we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay tuned. after the previous stage of my career was over everyone wondered what i was going to do next about different clubs on one hand it is logical to sit in the home fields where everything is familiar on the other i wanted a new challenge and a fresh perspective from i'm used to surprising people. what not to give you. i'm going to talk about football not for you or else you can think i was going to go. by the way ways of the flying here. even. if. you could as i live eat here if you don't then. fine. leave no. need. i d. . be done. will be done over. we have many things in this world and this is an email for everyone and why

institutional. some of it has to do with the fact simply that there is more consensus generally speaking on foreign policy matters then there is on on domestic matter no that's certainly true today and most specifically in every gawd true true russia and always this image of russia as a hostile power is pervasive in the states again for a river ride ever of a sort of complex reasons well professor brown and we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay tuned. welcome to max keiser plentiful survival guide. looking forward to. yanks this is what happens to pensions in britain. you watch kaiser report. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy confrontation let it be an arms race is often scary dramatic development only going to exist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical time to sit down and tom. welcome back to worlds apart with michael brown and professor emeritus of international affairs at the university of pittsburgh professor brennan just before the break we were talking about how. i think there were legitimate

institutional. some of it has to do with the fact simply that there is more consensus generally speaking on foreign policy matters than there is on on domestic matters. you know that's certainly true today and most pacifically in regard true true russia and always this image of russia as a hostile power is pervasive in the states again for a variety of other sort of complex reasons well professor brown and we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay tuned. let me let me. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy to confront a shouldn't let it be an arms race based on often spearing dramatic developments only going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical of time to sit down and talk. should this have come too late to pursue this i live eat it up are good for yourself then. you need. we have. this is. why some people take our things all the power just for themselves. three more. of our jobs. created in california. going to be. doing drugs my nephew drugs my sister just with drugs it was like an epidemic of dr

the only remaining democratically elected institution left in venezuela venezuelan american and she's a comedian she loves to call out critics of u.s. foreign policy because how dare they think they might know more than her when she is an actual venezuelan and furthermore she gives full support to juan guede oh the self-appointed u.s. backed president of venezuela but here's a detail the new york times failed to mention her father is ricardo hossam and the economics professor from harvard university and ricardo haas and her father is currently the envoy of wand wedo to the interim merican development bank the biggest lender in latin america looks a lot like miss hosmer has a pretty big dog in the fight however the new york times presents or is just a liberal minded venezuelan who wants what's best for her people it should be news or that her father has a lot to gain politically and professionally should regime change happen very cool of the new york times not to mention you know the fact that john houseman's dad is an economic advisor focus now the folks who handle ethics of the new york times have a special section dedicated to possible conflicts