asper formance for yarding taxis i wonder if taxis shouldn't be severed from the jurisdiction of m.t.a >> i'm going to take a pause in the line and ask, i am sorry i forgot your name. >> we have achieved good evening, ladies and gentlemen. this is amazing. my name is ru i've been a cab driver for 40 years. now retired. i taught the taxi driver institute for 25 years on top of that. i've seen a lot. the streets have their own kind of honesty but i'd have to say, the politics i've seen in the 40 years i've driven a cab have not had the same kind of honesty. the city has sold cab drivers and the cabin does tre cab indue river, over and over again. this series of proposals is frankly the worst. this thing at the airport, is astounding. maybe we should have seen it coming but frankly i didn't. i'm sort of reminded of the scene in "a man for all seasons." thomas moore is leaving the castle, the king's castle at windsor and is going up river to his home and he asked the boatman and the boatman says how much will you pay. and moore says the price is set. >> thank you. i'm sorry. next speaker.

we have provisions for legal non com formance. we don't penalize someone for having something that doesn't meet our standards of the code. in this case, this provides an opportunity for the adjacent parcel to have a rear yard that extends further out. the planning code provides for the provisions to allow for that and in this case the calculation of the rear yard currently ends is appropriate and meets all-pro visions of what the code would allow. >> final question, um, one of the appellants requested the largest windows -- i heard two things. thethey wanted a reduction on se on the back side. they want a reduction on the windows on the front side. what does that mean to the project and to the neighborhood in general? >> windows or massing? >> just windows. all i heard was windows. >> the reduction of windows either in the back or on the side wouldn't necessarily have any effect upon the neighborhood. >> the front windows and the back windows were mentioned. >> correct. >> are there ones that i would think would have the most sign

we have provisions for legal non com formance. we don't penalize someone for having something that doesn't meet our standards of the code. in this case, this provides an opportunity for the adjacent parcel to have a rear yard that extends further out. the planning code provides for the provisions to allow for that and in this case the calculation of the rear yard currently ends is appropriate and meets all-pro visions of what the code would allow. >>al

there's a lot of pay per for formance that are basically providing extra funding if clinics are able to meet certain metrics and lastly how do you support they running of the clinic and seeing the patients there so we're transformed to a higher functioning model of care. so some examples we have of those different ways that the pcmh model is being supported and implemented, the ucsf health, they have undergone a primary transformation that is based on the 10 building blocks models. with an explanation of a quality of good primary care because of the way it is organized and laid out it provides a road map for transformation. and so, since doing this, they've seen impressive gains in quality access patient experience. quality metrics such as mammogram and pap smear screenings but in metrics across the board as well. and part of the way that they were able to do this is actually using the infrastructure from the medical waiver public incentive program which again provided funding for meeting certain metrics and dedicating resources to doing things differently. it was critical for motiva

in the real world trump tweeted right after michelle wolf's per forman formance put it to right.s so important to our democracy and it first gets eroded, freedom of expression, it is not by law or executive orders, it is self censorship and that is what the white house correspondents look like they are doing. they are self centering and that is trump's dream and so anyone who attacks him and you say is it worth it to tell a joke to power and just sit it and and let things go by and that is trump's dream and they gave it to him. >> and we talked about this in the break and judy, people in the media attacked michelle wolf, savaged her for her routine which was funny and she was also attacking the press and making some really biting but real points about the press's sort of interdependent relationship with donald trump and she is attacked. you have the gleeful dancing because her netflix thing got canceled but she must be punished for telling jokes but the white house correspondents' dinner must be changed because trump's feelings were hurt. >> absolutely. he's a coward. you have to

a matter of resources, but we need to know what is needed for, as you put it, turning around per formance. mr. chairman, i have many more questions and i will defer to my colleagues and i will stay roughly to my five-minute rule. >> you were late, you went long, and our understanding is you are not coming back. >> i will be back. i shall return. but i think you for those kind words. hasenator blumenthal focused on facebook and current investigations. . would add to what he said this subcommittee and me personally will do everything we can to provide you the resources both legal and financial, and we will continue to monitor. we obviously want more information than you're capable , mr. chairman. we will pay a lot of attention to this issue and by that, i think, we're conveying its importance to us to you. let me start with the resource question. senator udall and i used to serve together on fsgc that funds the ftc and he abandoned me and i think i'm the only appropriator in the room. so i would say to you that i have a strong interest in ensuring that your agency has the resources it needs