his proposal implies an amendment to paragraph one of article 18 of the law on the fundamentals of health protection of citizens russian federationit will sound like this: everyone has the right to health care both before and after birth. that is, it means that assistance should be provided, including to the unborn child, fortunately, today medicine can do this while he is in the womb of the mother, and this is not like an operation that is done to the mother, but this is an operation that is done to the fetus, that is , another creature, a living person, this is of course the greatest achievement of science and medicine, but surprisingly, many lawyers believe that this law has little chance of seeing the light of day. it is strange why this is so, because, for example, there are countries in which the rights of an unborn person are protected by law, these are slovakia, the czech republic, ecuador, honduras, guatemala, chile, hungary, the dominican republic, madagascar and many, many other countries. and we don’t even have to go far. abkhazia, a wonderful post-soviet country with a rather tragic history. in 2016 , it adopted an a

his proposal implies an amendment to paragraph one of article 18 of the law on the fundamentals of health protection of citizens of the russian federationw it will sound like this: everyone has the right to health protection both before and after birth. that is, it is implied that assistance should. this law see the light of day, it is strange why this is so, because, for example, there are countries in which the rights of an unborn person are protected by law, these are slovakia, and the czech republic, ecuador, honduras, guatemala, chile, hungary, dominican republic, madagascar and many, many other countries. and we don't even have to go far. abkhazia, a wonderful post-soviet country with... and that means that every unborn person is precisely an unborn new individual, a new unique being, the highest creation of nature, but if we break away from thinking about universal human ethics, religious etiquette and so on, just come down to earth and think about the practical significance of what we want to talk about. because we know that the results of interruption pregnancy, that is, this embryo, it can be used for treatment, salvation, eve

his proposal implies an amendment to paragraph one of article 18 of the law on the fundamentals of health protection of citizens of the russian federationd now it will sound like this: everyone has the right to health protection both before and after birth. that is, it means that assistance should be provided, including to the unborn. it is strange why this is so, because, for example, there are countries in which legislative protection is provided the rights of an unborn person, these are slovakia, the czech republic, ecuador, honduras, guatemala, chile, hungary, the dominican republic, madagascar and many, many other countries. and we don’t even have to go far. abkhazia, a beautiful, post-soviet country with a rather tragic history. in 2016 , it adopted an amendment to the law on healthcare, here’s what it says: the state recognizes the right to life of an unborn child from the moment of conception prohibits artificial termination of pregnancy, and why didn’t we again the ban is being discussed, the conversation is about ethics, what i want to understand what is very important to understand, here if. the results of the termination of

of the right to life , health protection before the birth of a child, this is very important. it means an amendment to paragraph one of article 18 of the law on the fundamentals of health protection of citizens of the russian federationd now it will sound like this: everyone has the right to health protection both before and after birth, that is, it means that assistance should be provided, including to the unborn child, fortunately, today medicine can do this while he is in the womb, and this is not... of an unborn person, this is slovakia, and the czech republic, ecuador, honduras, guatemala, chile, hungary, the dominican republic, madagascar and many, many other countries. and we don't even have to go far. abkhazia, a wonderful post-soviet country with a rather tragic history. in 2016, it adopted an amendment to the law on healthcare. here's what it says. the state recognizes the right to life of an unborn child from the moment of conception prohibits artificial termination of pregnancy, and why didn't we again there is a ban, there is a conversation about ethics, which i want to understand, which is very important to understand, if you think about it, just think about it, you can imagine that from the moment life

his proposal implies an amendment to paragraph one of article 18 of the law on the fundamentals of protection. health of citizens of the russian federationill sound like this: everyone has the right to health protection both before and after birth. that is, it means that assistance should be provided, including to the unborn child. fortunately, today medicine is can do while he is in the womb of the mother, and this is not like an operation that is done to the mother, but it is. an operation that is done to the fetus, that is , to another creature, a living person, this is of course the greatest achievement of science and medicine, but what is surprising is that many lawyers believe that there is little chance of this law seeing the light of day, it is strange why this is so, because , let's say, there are countries in which the rights of an unborn person are protected by law, these are slovakia, the czech republic, ecuador. the same person, that is, these are billions individuals are completely different, they can be similar, they can be of the same nationality, skin color, eye shape, but they are individual, and therefore, every unborn

his proposal implies an amendment to paragraph one of article 18 of the law on the fundamentals of health protection of citizens of the russian federationke this: everyone has the right to health protection both before and after birth, that is, it means that assistance should be provided, including to the unborn child, fortunately today medicine can do this while he is in the womb of the mother, and this is not, as it were, an operation that is performed on the mother, but this is an operation that is performed on the fetus, that is, another being. individuals are completely different, they can be similar, they can be of the same nationality, skin color, eye shape, but they are individual, and therefore, each unborn person is just that - unborn, a new individual, a new unique creature, the highest creation of nature, but if we break away from reflections on universal human ethics, the results of termination of pregnancy, that is , this embryo, it can be used for treatment, salvation, even saving other people from various diseases. but let's turn to the dictionary on biomedical ethics, here's what's written there: the ban on using an emb

article 18 of the law on the fundamentals of protecting the health of citizens in the russian federation it will be sound like this: everyone has the right to health care both before and after birth. that is, it means that assistance should be provided, including to the unborn child. fortunately, today medicine can do this while it is in the womb, and this is not like an operation that... these are slovakia, and the czech republic, ecuador, honduras, guatemala, chile, hungary, the dominican republic, madagascar and many, many other countries. and we do not even have to go far. abkhazia, a wonderful post-soviet country with quite a tragic story, in 2016 , an amendment to the law on health care was adopted. this is what it says, the state recognizes. the right to life.