> and could i just ask about one of the ongoing frustrating projects that van ness, brt and the geary brts and just talk about the delivery plans for those projects in the bigger picture of kind of this proposal? >> and just to quickly answer that question, and so there are two projects, and the brt and the geary brt, and as the committee knows, we are completing the environmental phase on geary and we are working through the five y pp and identifying different federal sources that might be able to fully fund the construction phase of that. and i think that through the fiscal year, 2019, we are looking to try to fund as much as possible, the details of the design phase and so again, perfect, question, and chair mar, if we can fully fund the detail phase and it makes it attractive to federal sources that will be upcoming to the core capacity and small starts and federal funds and that will make the project as ready as possible and as attractive to possible to the various state and federal sources that will be upcoming in the next five years. in regard to van ness, as many of you know there

future revenue sources are critical but i wanted to get back to the plan for the van ness and the geary brts because i noticed that you mentioned 2019 now, is kind of one of the benchmarks for design and completing and i am just wondering from the november or the ttf, funds that are within this can you just kind of give us a sense of how much you have committed to moving forward with the geary brt, for example and other parts of the rapid transit system >> yeah, there is so, there are two ballot, and well, three, proposed for november but the two sources that we should be talking about are the general obligation bond first and the proposal for the increase in the vehicle license fee that would generate the general funds which are more flexible and the reports developed for both of those sources include a category for rapid network improvements and so it could be numerous projects, and van ness would be a project that the sources could be used for and the geary would be a project that those sources could be used for. and as our thing is related to the tep. and with regard to geary, i think th