of nato after he — humiliated the secretary—general of nato after he became _ humiliated the secretary—generalr he became president and sing publicly— nato after he became president and sing publicly that, _ nato after he became president and sing publicly that, why— nato after he became president and sing publicly that, why should - sing publicly that, why should america — sing publicly that, why should america which— sing publicly that, why should america which spends - sing publicly that, why should america which spends 3.5% i sing publicly that, why should | america which spends 3.5% of sing publicly that, why should i america which spends 3.5% of the sing publicly that, why should - america which spends 3.5% of the gdp on defence _ america which spends 3.5% of the gdp on defence and — america which spends 3.5% of the gdp on defence and no _ america which spends 3.5% of the gdp on defence and no european _ america which spends 3.5% of the gdp on defence and no european members| on defence and no european members meet their— on defence and no european members meet their targets. _ on defenc

being prime minister, they talked about the fact that he could would lead to be the secretary general of natothe end of the day it should be noted that the role of the general secretary is important, but it was not always so. first creation. no one knew the name of the general secretary, because he was forbidden to communicate with the press, he was just a moderator at the meetings, and with one of the ministers spoke to the press with the press, who was instructed by his colleagues to report what happened, but over time the role of the secretary of state has changed, today he is the main speaker, the main disseminator of information, and he, of course, his role is a bit more than it was, he cannot to make decisions for countries, he cannot impose... there is somehow his opinion, so always express it, they are very careful, very diplomatic, because he personifies everyone. well, in conclusion, i will just say that there are also certain jokes about that, in particular, a very interesting phrase was said by the prime minister of estonia, kaya kalas, who said that nato has long been talking abo

andrzej duda decided to send a letter to all the leaders of nato countries, as well as the secretary general to the secretary general nato jens stoltenberg, where the proposal is formulated as to why the conflict is justified. defense spending and setting a threshold of 3% of gdp in the countries of the north atlantic alliance. today we must return to that level, to the level of the cold war. my letter opens a discussion on this topic. and by the way, regarding the statement of jens stoltenberg from the secretary general of nato about the possibility of forming a budget of 100 billion dollars for a five-year period. hungary is the only nato country that has already opposed the alliance coordinating military aid to ukraine, about this is written by the voice of america, and it actually means that even at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, the government of the prime minister of hungary announced that it did not want to help the ukrainians defend themselves against russian aggression, although the secretary general of nato says that he talked about this proposal with the hungarian prime

viktor, a meeting of the ukraine-nato council took place, and after its conclusion, the secretary generaljend stoltenberg. stated that the allies are ready to provide our country with additional resources air defense. let's listen to stoltenberg. regarding improvement. air defense systems for ukraine, i want to say that it will happen soon. germany also decided to provide additional systems to ukraine. ukraine will soon receive additional ones. patriot systems, our allies, which, unfortunately, do not have available systems, they can provide financial, financial assistance to ukraine. we also work within the framework of strengthening production, production of precisely those necessary systems that would meet the goals. mr. viktor, explain please, why do our western partners take such a long time with air defense? i, too, mr. serhiy, have the same question, why did this happen? i remember... the year 2022, when , including my children, painted signs: "close the ukrainian sky from russian missiles. two years have passed, and only now somewhere there they want to get some additional systems

of ours. from space and in general our automation showed class, many thanks to everyone involved, the name of christopher kawole has already been heard here, and the head of the joint armed forces of natoto, this always not an american, then the commander of nat's armed forces in europe is always an american general, it was, it will be, this american general, in fact , probably became the biggest, well, the biggest irritant, as it were... not to say obscenities, that is, for the entire ukrainian community, because he came to a meeting of the house of representatives of the us congress and simply slashed the truth into the womb, well, you can’t say it more rudely, he said the following, that in the very near future ukraine will completely run out of artillery ammunition and missiles for air defense systems, that is, yes , indeed, he, in principle, somewhere said those texts that zelensky says, but zelensky at the same time. this tells us that a large counter-offensive is beginning, he talks with sirsky about the fact that some square kilometers of russian territory are being recaptured, and that the ukrainian armed forces are having real military successes on the front line, and at the

and it is in particular great to be here as the secretary general of nato, because i'm not able to thinkidual person that has played a more important role for this alliance than president truman, because we have to try to imagine how the world looked like at the end of the second world war. because then the plan was of course to get the troops, the forces back home. that was the case for everyone, but especially for the united states, who sent people across the atlantic and to europe to help end the second world war. the united states left europe after the first world war. that was not a big success. so therefore, i'm glad that after the second world war, the united states decided to stay -- stay with their forces, stay with their troops, and not only that, but also to underpin the transatlantic bond with the marshall aid, with a big economic program to underpin the transatlantic bond. and then on top of that -- not only keeping their forces and providing enormous economic support to europe, but on top of that, actually signed a treaty obligation to protect and defend allies in europe. a

. >> thank you.ey the deputy secretary general of nato joins us to discuss the threat from russia andhe global stage here that is only on "sunday night in america." $100,0 or more she can sell all or part of it to coventry for cash. even a term policy. even a term policy? even a term policy! find out if you're sitting on a goldmine. call coventry direct today at the number on your screen, or visit coventrydirect.com. ey ♪ ♪: welc >> trey: welcome back to "sunday night in america." nato has been around since most of us have been around. this alliance was forged in the aftermath of world war ii.rmat agreements were made byies countries of good conscience to defend one another from what was then called and acts of evil. three of the forces joinedsrup together to disrupt the world order. the countries may change overge the course of history, but the battle remains. versus evil, freedomus t versus tyranny a world led by the united states or a world led by others. in article five treaty should at nation be attacked and otherers members will help. it has been invoked once, by us, after 9/11.

such very harsh, very hysterical, very emotional assessments that were given by the secretary general of natoain, literally, you know, washing away from a huge number of questions related to the fact that what are the plans to expand nato to other continents, he stated that there are no such plans, but... we already understand perfectly well that if this does not happen according to a formal, so to speak, indicator, then nato, this destructive ideology associated with military-political and geostrategic an attempt to dominate, one way or another , gradually in different ways without the nato cap, but through the efforts of washington and britain it begins. is now unfolding on the european continent, and this is not only the story of the creation of nato and the aggressive engine that is embedded in this organization and has not gone away, it is not only the inability to keep one’s word, in fact , the reluctance to do this from the beginning, but no, this is a matter for the future, how dangerous this bloc is in principle for the international... in yerevan they were called excellent, in mosco

moreover, a number of nato countries generally doubted the alliance. basically able to raise that kindo leverage to raise money among member countries. it is also unclear whether washington will support such changes. last month , us secretary of defense lloyd austin called the current contact group format very effective. the north atlantic alliance has previously been reluctant to take a more active role in the conflict in ukraine for fear of provoking a broader and harsher military response from russia, which is already sees the conflict as a proxy war between her country and nato. but it turns out that the ukrainian patient is more likely dead than alive, and is immediately compared directly with a patient tied to an iv. a senior official at the ukrainian defense ministry's main intelligence directorate, brigadier general dmitry timkov, compared the country to a patient on life support desperately in need of additional help. they are going to allocate 20 billion annually, of course, not enough, we know how much this voracious beast and monster under called ukraine, but nevertheless,

they themselves publish for what, what they want to show, prove, say with this, the secretary general of natose guys are laying the foundations of western norms of behavior, that is, the basis is lies, more lies on top, more lies smeared on top, that is, guys. they open their mouths to simply lie, then they do it, play the fool, and how can they get away with it all, and the change of power in nato, the secretary general has changed, everything, everything, what he promised, the previous one, it doesn’t matter and so on, as in the united states of america, where power is also supposedly changing and so on, although in reality of course not, because this is a classic oligarchy, for me the seventy-fifth anniversary of nato in general is a nervous stoltenberg, these are his shaking hands and so on, well, 75 years is an age after all, any man will tell you that... there is a lot of things that can be talked about, yes, but little that can be done in reality, well, biden is an example , by the way, there is plenty for this serious reasons: nato is a very loose, amorphous bureaucratic organization,

ukraine has already received some information about what the secretary general of natohe ukrainian president were talking about, so they discussed the creation of a special fund financial support of ukrainian defense in the amount of 100 billion euros. yes, according to our president, the allies really have the opportunity to implement such an initiative, and the key story is the details of the creation of such a fund. i am quoting zelenskyi. it is important that it is not at the expense of bilateral. volumes, which are marked by our security guarantee agreements. mr. oleksandr, in your opinion, what else could jen stoltenberg have brought with him, we understand, well, that the secretary general on... it is not only about money, we understand that we need a significant number of systems air defense, we need at least seven batteries of patriots in order to somehow protect our civilian objects and our cities. what else could stoltenberg bring? it must be understood that the entire north atlantic alliance is currently preparing for the washington summit, and the strategy

today, sir. meeting of the ukraine-nato council, and after its conclusion, nato secretary general ye tenberg stated that the allies are ready to provide additional means of air defense to our state. let's listen to stoltenberg. regarding the improvement of air defense systems for ukraine, i want to say that it will happen soon. germany also decided to provide additional systems to ukraine. ukraine will soon receive additional patriot systems. our allies, who, unfortunately, do not have available systems, they can provide ukraine with financial, financial assistance. we are also working to increase production. production just right. what happened, i remember the year 2022, when including my children painted to cry, close the ukrainian sky from. rockets. two years have passed, and only now, somewhere out there, they want to get some additional systems and, accordingly, missiles for them. i have, of course, some guesses as to why this is happening, because it is obvious that we are really at such a turning point in the war. at the turning point. stage from all points of view, in a turnin

stoltenberg's unannounced visit, the secretary general of nato came to kyiv and already met with the aine, volodymyr zelenskyi. the situation on the front line and the supply of the military.

viktora, a meeting of the ukraine-nato council took place, and after its conclusion, nato secretary generalenberg said that the allies are ready to provide our country with additional anti-aircraft weapons. defense, let's listen to stoltenberg. regarding the improvement of air defense systems for of ukraine, i want to say that it will happen soon. germany also decided to provide additional systems to ukraine. ukraine will soon receive additional patriot systems. our allies. which, unfortunately, there are no available, accessible systems, they can provide financial assistance to ukraine. we also work within the framework of strengthening production, production of precisely those necessary systems that would meet the goals. mr. viktor, please explain why our western partners are struggling with air defense for so long? i also. mr. serhiy, the question is, what happened, i remember the year 2022, when my children also drew cries, close the ukrainian sky from russian missiles. two years have passed, and only now, somewhere out there, they want to get some additional systems and, accordingly, m

of nato. in all these statements, mr. viktor, one thing is missing, that scholz, and stoltenberg, and others, well, stoltenberg, the secretary generalt well, that other leaders of western countries talked about the fact that we want putin to lose and the russian federation to lose, but there are no such calls or statements.

he wrote the foreword to the article even anders fok rasmusson himself, the former secretary general of nato, and this is andriy yermak, the head of the office, but everyone is surprised, how so not president zelenskyi, not syrskyi, but yarmak, which... it seems that there is no status, how to react to it, if this, if it is based on the results of last year, then it would be useful to mention here that he but also, but i don't think that it was a pr campaign by yermak himself, because how, if i found out, for example, that this yermak there motivated rasmus to write that article in order to promote himself by... say what he is well done, i would have thought badly of yermak, that he is not very smart, why? because we must know that our president is very applause dependent, and he does not like that there are even more successful actors than him in this theater, yes, and yermak may have the role of a stage director, the role of a prompter, but not the role of a player, here we do not see zelensky, but we see and... that is, how would they choose influential people, well, maybe from an overvie

after talking with donald tusk, the prime minister of listan and jens stoltenberg , the secretary general of nato, he is going to germany to meet with german chancellor olaf schulze about european security and the russian threat. consult the british government announced that in the current financial year. another 3 billion pounds of military aid will be allocated to ukraine , according to published official government debt reports england reached two trillion and 700 billion pounds and the highest amount in the history of this country. mojtaba ghasemzadeh of the london broadcasting agency. up to 300 million tomans, he doesn't want real estate collateral , he doesn't want to block the guarantor's deposit up to 50 million, my husband doesn't want to pay back, wait for 5 years , let me ask about rome's legal fees, sorry, you also mention the roof conditions for legal entities, up to 750 million tomans, with the same conditions, you can even transfer to your employees . did you hear? yes, i heard. the nikan mills plan of the mills credit institution . quality, variety, quality, variety, quality, vari

stoltenberg, the secretary general of nato, who was in kyiv yesterday, and he told him that there will be more air defense for ukraine, he promised, he is sure of this, and so are we now. we see the news that the german government handed over a new package of material and technical military aid to ukraine, and then, in particular, the system was included sky next air defense, can you tell us what kind of system it is and can it protect the southern regions there for example, and again, when is this kind of air defense assistance expected for the southern regions in particular to make the defense more powerful? well, of course we won't and can't reveal our plans, but as far as i uh uh... i remember, skyling is just one of those systems that have to fight with medium-range targets, well, that is, its targets - it's the same drones kamikaze it's system is more like a cheetah as far as i'm concerned remember, i'm not a specialist in air defense systems, but nevertheless, from what i've seen, this is not the tool that should destroy exactly such. this requires a so-called large air defense

process is gaining such positive dynamics here. if we even remember that he is the secretary general of natoth an initiative to form such a support fund for ukraine within the limits of 100 billion dollars for 5 years, today this issue will be discussed within the framework of the ministers of foreign affairs in nato, and this is another component that combines financial and technical and military-technical assistance there ukraine, so in any case the dynamics are quite positive. the question is that effective approaches to mobilization as a process of rational and effective increase of the capabilities of the ukrainian army should be ensured now from the ukrainian side, because the story with the package of laws on mobilization, which will now be turned upside down, it actually sometimes creates a misunderstanding of why the political component in the country is acting so slowly against the background of serious threats to the security of the state as a whole. in tatarstan, this factory is where drones are assembled for the attack on ukraine, as it testifies, that is, moscow and kazan, lowe

of nato. in all these statements, mr. viktor, lack one thing, that scholz and stoltenberg and others, well, stoltenberg, the secretary general of nato, but that other leaders of the western countries talk about what we want, that putin... play and that the russian federation lost, but there are no such appeals and no such statements, why? well, i really hope that during the voting there , in some documents, in some projects , there is this, from the forces to the fact that russia must lose, and this means that politically, politically, this message can be strengthened, sorry for the taftology. during this forum, the so-called peace forum, which switzerland is going to hold in june, and there is such a small, shall we say, hope that just such a questioning will force many leaders of the european union in the first place, who are still in the position , when they waver... between how to sit through the situation and how to get involved in helping ukraine, but in this case there is a small, i repeat, a small hope that the world begins to rethink this, this, this thesis, that is, when we were told that russia should not win, but

so lionel as jen skelton burge, the secretary general of nato, he goes to the, a rainy of the ukrainian embassy in belgium. and they're, they're talking about war plans and ukraine. well, given what israel just did, russia would have the right to bomb the ukrainian embassy there because there's discussing war plants and terrorism. of course, the world would never accept that. but the world, the western world, lajna, lajna turns its eye away from a crime. i mean that one of the simplest things in international relations is that embassies and consulates are off limits except for here we go again, lionel to quote ronald reagan theater. there you go again. there you go again with this thing called logic. there you go again, pointing out the obvious, don't you understand. these are different times. don't you understand that these places are actually used as a human shield or building shields? these are actually repositories and a battle ground where weapons are good. you, you create the narrative. when you try to think of a way to excuse of this, you just come up with something and then you

defense or offensive, and you have already started talking about it, but today the secretary general of naton stoltenberg, arrived in kyiv, and he admitted that the nato allies had not delivered what they had promised, meaning that... the us had been negotiating an eu aid package for a long time, the eu had not delivered the promised amount of munitions and that this had serious consequences on the battlefield. what ukraine will receive in the future from the promise is both ammunition from the usa and american aid. i will clarify, from your point of view, this is all for defense, or are they still preparing something there for favorable conditions and for the offensive. in other words, what stoltenberg says about consequences are no longer counter-effects, or are there more? some there through how long will it take to fix? well, the american tactic is as follows: now they have announced the conditional transfer of weapons there for a billion dollars. that's how this package will end, they'll see how it's a weapon, how the situation on the battlefield has changed, and then the next package,

regarding such a perspective, perhaps soltenberg, jens stoltenberg, the secretary general of nato, is to mention this idea, in fact it is a formula, well, it is an old formula even before the ukrainian conflict, there is peace or security in exchange for territory, peace in exchange on the territory, we remember this wording from the israeli-palestinian conflict, but in our russian-ukrainian context of the war, experts talked about this before, last summer until... almost a year, a year has passed, there was such a richard hass and other people who well offered such a scheme that let's have the following option: donbas is a part of russia occupied by russia, ukraine, there donbas, crimea and other, other territories, they temporarily remain under russia, and the rest, the rest of the territory of ukraine. we accept nato and guarantee it peace, tranquility, security, there and inviolability. last year, as you rightly said, we were all here in ukraine, well, not only, and friends of ukraine too, were too optimistic, maybe even romantic, romanticizing our successes on the fronts. summer

far they are willing to go, it is now necessary to listen to jens stoltenberg, the secretary general of nato, who stated that military objectives are on the territory. of the russian federation, and not the occupied territories of ukraine, are legitimate targets for the armed forces of ukraine. that is, everything that serves the russian army on the territory of russia can be a target of attacks from ukraine. this is a very far-reaching taka a declaration that did not exist six months ago, as well as jens stoldeng's statements about and the decision of nato member countries about the military mission. nato, which should help ukraine, yes stoltenberg's statement, when it was not determined in america whether it would help or not , that nato could take over the entire burden of helping ukraine, and not the ramshteim format, which the americans immediately denied, we are the leaders here, but let's not move, and this only meant that the role of europe and the european members of nato, which in principle in... and macron, well, the same should be said of donald tusk, and to a certain extent of j

understand that stoltenberg is, so to speak, a minister without a portfolio, that is , the secretary general of natoortunately, he has much less authority than the head of certain sovereign governments or financial institutions institutions, yes, but he can coordinate, well , if there is an idea, it is at least something, but the key story is where else to get 100 billion euros in order to fill this fund, how long do you think, in the end, mr. maxim, they would did you do that? there for six months, a year there, i don't know, or maybe the money would have been ready, you would have pulled out, you know, a suitcase of euros or bucks, so to speak, and formed at least half of the required amount. actually, this is exactly what i was referring to, that nato is not just some separate, played-out organism, it is an alliance countries and here we return to france again. they are now frantically looking for the 3 billion euros that they have already... this fund, because if we are talking about the fact that stoltenberg is proposing this initiative precisely to prevent such incidents as with the united sta

and it is the most important thing, that is 100 billion, the euro-atlantic fund, the secretary general of nato, which we already mentioned today with marta, yes, he voiced his, so to speak, financial vision, 100 mi, 100 billion euros, let it be for 5 years, well , but someone has to give this money, you understand, and there jen stoltenberg said a lot of beautiful, correct phrases that are pleasant to our ukrainian heart, but 100 billion euros and phrases about 100 billion euros are a little different, so to speak. three minutes each, thank you you are right that it is necessary not to declare the results, but also, when we talk to you about the washington summit, we cannot knock on this door only thanks to our armed forces of ukraine, the authorities, we as the parliament, must also do and show that the country democratic and we are moving towards reforming our country and also changing the standards. and you know, we are doing our homework, and not just knocking with empty hands, and only referring to our armed forces of ukraine, this is not enough, and therefore what we are talking about no

far they are willing to go, it is necessary now to listen to jens stoltenberg, the secretary general of natohat military targets on the territory of the russian federation, not the occupied territories of ukraine, are legitimate targets for the armed forces. of ukraine, that is, everything that serves the russian army on the territory of russia can be a target of attacks from ukraine. this is a very far-reaching declaration, which did not exist six months ago, as well as the statements of jens stoltenberg about and the decisions of nato member countries about the nato military mission that should help ukraine. statement by es stoltenberg, when in... they decided whether there would be aid or not, that nato could shoulder the entire burden of aid to ukraine, and not the ramshtei format, which the americans immediately denied, we are the leaders here, but let's not push , and this only meant that the role of europe and the european members of nato, which in principle are the mouthpieces of macron, but also donald tusk, is growing . and to some extent jens stoltenberg, they stated that there is

interview with the lbc radio station - said the deputy, lbc - i'm sorry, said the deputy secretary general of nato, mircea zhuana. according to him, the decision to start negotiations with russia will be made by ukraine independently, and now the leadership of the north atlantic alliance has the moral and legal responsibility to do so. to help ukraine with everything necessary to fight against russian aggression. below is a short quote from nato deputy secretary general mircha dzhuana. even if they sooner or later they will start talking about peace, then it will not be about peace as such, but about a truce for rearmament and further return. it is very important for us to ensure that ukraine becomes closer to nato and the european union. after all, the best guarantees would be if ukraine became a member. nato, but we all understand very well that we will not be accepted until the end of the war in ukraine. well, the gradual and such confident departure from moscow continues in armenia. relations between armenia and russia are not going through the best of times. he said this during the session of

needs of ukraine, he understands the capabilities, what is his strength here, in the fact that general president pavel, after all, he was the commander-in-chief, leave it at that, the head of the nato, and he knows who has what and who can be extorted, and... we are very grateful to him for this , and he inspired our baltic partners with his example, so the process goes on, unfortunately, unfortunately, as always, you know, and a year ago we were standing, asking for her help in a terrible battle, remember, severodonetsk, lysychansk, we are asking for shells, we are asking for guns. and bakhmut, we are standing, asking for help, and it arrives later than it should, you know, now about the f-16, some of the military, aviation experts say, it is very good that they will come to us, and we are all waiting for them looking forward, we seriously hope for them, but they say, but these planes were needed for the day before yesterday, and the day before yesterday, they promised in the spring, and now they say summer will come, f16 will bring, mr. pavle, the national moment of silence is coming , and we to you thank you for having time to chat with espresso viewers. pavlo lakiychuk, the hea

for more than 60 billion dollars is extremely important, but what else... said the secretary general of nato, let's listen to jens stoltenberg in direct speech. nato allies welcome this decision, because it is very important that ukraine receives the necessary military support, and the aid package from the united states will help it shoot down russian missiles, defend itself along the front line, and also deliver deep strikes against russian military potential, so it is very important, and this decision also demonstrates a duality. really important decision and it was interesting to see on facebook how friends, my friends, react after all, you probably also followed when this vote took place in the house of representatives on saturday night sometime after 8:00 p.m. and when it took place and when the vote was taken, what was being done on facebook beforehand? because it is important for us, well , tomorrow there will be a meeting of the senate, this is the upper house of the american congress, where this decision already passed by the house of representatives is to be ratified, and immediate

by the united states, it gave the necessary impetus, but even at a meeting with the secretary general of nato, president zelenskyi said that the decision. but the process of supplying serious weapons is delayed. why this happens is difficult to say, but one can imagine, well, for example, if indeed in the absence of budgeting by a decision by congress, then budgeting by the administration, in the united states department of defense, for example, the necessary processes not only for production, that basically a long process, but also the preparation of such weapons from the arsenal. in the armed forces of the united states, because obviously this requires appropriate solutions, including financial ones, and this, of course, created such a gap, again, a gap that is now beginning to be filled, but again, these weapons are delivered from overseas, and of course you cannot deliver the same ammunition quickly, unless you use the european arsenals of the united states, mr. mykhailo, a few days ago the minister of... germany, boris pistoria , stated that there are signs that the russian the federatio

on our airwaves, we will remind you that jen stoltenberg is in kyiv today, he is the secretary general of nato with zelensky, he met with our military at the national defense university in kyiv, they discussed the prospects of strengthening ukrainian air defense, in particular, and zelensky said that today our experts can definitely say what is the ideal system for us, how much we lack, our air defense is not yet universal, says zelensky, but it is changing daily, being filled not only with air defense systems, but also with rebs, anti-drone systems, etc. ugh. thank you marta, and an important message. yes, about an hour ago, nazar voloshyn, lieutenant colonel of the armed forces of ukraine, spokesman for the operational and strategic grouping of khortets troops, worked on our air. regarding the situation in the area of ​​chasovoy yar. on the outskirts, there were attempts and attempts by the enemy to bypass chasiv, near the villages of ivanivskyi and bohdanivka. the enemy aims to take the flattering city in this way. and go around it in a circle, but all attempts and efforts of the enemy are

secretary general of nato. assures that washington is not too late in supporting ukraine, but the delayed the positions of kyiv. during the months of downtime, we see that russia has more ammunition, while the ukrainians are short of artillery shells at a ratio of one to five and even one to ten , depending on the area. and the lack of air defense means means that fewer and fewer russian missiles and drones are being shot down. everyone is happy that funds were allocated to distant ukraine, the majority of republicans did not support the initiative, they are not satisfied that not a cent was given to protect the country’s southern border, but about 300 million will be sent to ukrainian border guards so that they can better catch those fleeing the country. speaker of the house of representatives mike johnson, who gave the green light for congress to vote on an aid package to ukraine, was accused of betraying conservatives of everything american. the people had had enough, april 15th was the tax deadline, and washington had betrayed the american people by sending over $90 billion to suppo

meanwhile the secretary general of nato, jens stoltenberg, says ukraine can rely on nato support nowinterview to be broadcast in the uk tomorrow morning on "sunday with laura kuenssberg" he says all wars end in compromise and both ukraine and russia will eventually have to come to an agreement: most wars end at the negotiating table. what we know is that what happens around the negotiating table is very closely linked to the situation on the battlefield. so, now, russia believes they can achieve goals on the battlefield by continuing to perch militarily against ukraine. a way to convince russia that they have to sit down and accept the solution where ukraine prevails as an independent sovereign democratic nation in europe is to give military support to ukraine. then of course, at the end of the day, it has to be ukraine that decides which kinds of compromises they are willing to be. we need to enable them to be in a position where they can actually achieve an acceptable result around the negotiating table. does achieve an acceptable result around the negotiating table.— achieve an ac

of america, and the german chancellors, and the leadership went from poland, and the secretary general of natone went because they are not sure, because they look and see, what is american society became polarized. it gradually plunged into its own political discussion, they do not see, they are politically blind and do not see anything beyond their borders now at this historical stage, and in europe they were scared, look at the meeting of foreign ministers at the level of foreign ministers of nato member countries , what they discussed, will the united states fulfill its political and security obligations, or do we need to develop our security, european sector in parallel? that's what they say, and help ukraine, because ukraine gives the europeans time to stand up, to clarify their relations with the americans, and so on. regarding israel and us comparison, there is no need to compare israel and us, we are in different statuses, israel is the closest partner, plus it has political, financial and technological influence on the united states of america, and they help them through force, they d

brings the same strawberry back from britain and the meeting there in poland with the secretary general of natok and not the reverse whore with the germans, these are just the first signs of building a coalition around a center like britain, willing to help us , to put it mildly, to go to the end, well, that means that there will be several coalitions in the seventh bloc, you who will say that we must go to the end and you who will say that we must be ob'. operations in the east, which are nato, to be honest, this is not nato, these are countries that belong to the nato bloc, but they acted in their own, national form together with a coalition of people like them, they could belong, by the way, for example, operation in libya, if you remember, sweden and finland joined there, which, in principle, sweden bombed without being, without being a member nato, there is an indicator that is not necessarily nato, it can be coalitions. from nato and non -nato, relatively speaking, the australians, the australians are now training with the new zealanders, training our soldiers in great britain, they direc

the trip, the same sunka is back in britain and a meeting there in poland with the secretary general of nato tusk and not a reverse whore with the germans, that's just right the first signs of building around a center like britain a coalition willing to help us. to put it mildly, to go to the end, well, that means that there will be several coalitions in the seventh bloc, those who will say that it is necessary to go to the end and you, who will say that you must be careful, we do not want, welcome, you remember, there were also cases of operations in the east, which nato, to be honest, is not nato, these are countries that belong to the nato bloc, but they acted in their national form together with a coalition of people like them, they could belong to things, for example, the operation in libya, if you remember, joined there... this finland, which, in principle, sweden bombed, not being, not being a member of nato. there is an indicator that it is not necessarily nato, it can be a coalition of nato and non-nato, relatively speaking, the australians, the australians are now training with the

therefore, these statements by the secretary general of nato are from the same industry on the one hand the eu, ukraine in nato, ukraine. there will be democracy, ukraine will be free, nothing has happened in these years, not even democracy, no eu, no peace, no freedom, no nato, no damn thing, only war, blood, death, new agendas, so today i analyzed the new law, relevant at this hour, on mobilization in ukraine. listen, it’s crazy to read, it’s scary, but you know what struck me more today is not that everyone is being mobilized, the crooked, the lame, the sick, but what if you have money. it says this: if you are the owner of an enterprise, you don’t even work there, and these are all ukrainian enterprises that are not state-owned for a long time, they are all owned by an oligarch, then you are freed from the agenda, i translate, they built, they built the country, yes, they said, ukraine will be free, in the end, if you don’t have money, go and die for other people’s interests, and if you have money, live in peace and line your pockets further in this war, returning to the question th

anniversary of nato, i'm thrilled to host a conversation to explore the future of the alliance and ways to bolster nato's defense. to help me answer, i'm joined by a distinguished panel of next generationxperts. please help me welcome an assistant director for the transatlantic security initiative at the scocroft center for security and strategy. sophia martinez, program manager and research associate for the center for international studies. jason, a program associate at the wilson center. and krista, a program officer with the transatlantic and defense program at the center for european policy and analysis. thank you, guys for joining. before we begin, if a few housekeeping things for you guys. this is on the record. few housekeeping things for you guys. this is on the record. we will leave time for audience questions. for virtual participants, please feel free to log your questions at ask ac.org. we encourage you to interact with us on x, twitter and use the #stronger with allies. i wanted to kick off the conversation with all of you guys. nato is facing an increasingly complex and volatile global security landscape, now and in the future. in your view, what do you anticipate being

military base outside warsaw, the prime minister, his polish opposite number and the secretary—general of the natoing... today i'm announcing the biggest strengthening of our national defence for a generation. we will increase defence spending to a new baseline of 2.5% of gdp by 2030. that starts today. is it time to be candid now with people that the costs of supporting ukraine are going to run into the billions and billions for years and years to come? could this last another decade? well, chris, as i touched on, unfortunately, we're living in a more dangerous time than at any point since the end of the cold war. if we don't deter russia in ukraine, all we're going to do is embolden putin to go even further, and indeed embolden other adversaries around the world. there's no way we can run away from that cost. we have to pay. not least because we need to understand that the most expensive alternative is to allow putin to win in ukraine. labour says it would raise defence spending to 2.5% of national income as soon as resources allow — not as concrete a commitment. i fully support what the prime m

russian army, even with part of its combat potential, and they declared war on us, and thus, stoltenberg can now do whatever he wants , he is still general secretary of nato, he is still a boy on his way out, so he is trying to gain a foothold, kirby shouts to him, where are you going, it’s too early to sit, sit, the herring is back in the jar, i think we are in this regard, starting from these words of the main , is still nato. have to say, well then our task, still with the wrong hands, is to destroy the combat potential and living military force of nato countries in any part of the world, we now have every right to do this. today i had very positive news that made me smile, this is a statement by the minister of foreign affairs of the czech republic, jan lepavsky, that they collected pennies from twenty countries, but damn, it wasn’t enough, they only found a shell for 3000, well, with a million it just doesn’t work out, they still have 500, 500 thousand options there, but they need more chip in, you have to chip in, otherwise it won’t work, some info-gypsies. i wanted to say that, well, in general, i kind of read the biography of peter pavel, he is ce