>> glenn: i'm a cuisine whore, you know?cuisine, as soon as you look at cuisine, you're looking at politics. you're looking at medicine. you're looking at the advanced thinking. >> anthony: i'll agree with you that there is nothing more political than food. >> glenn: you got it. >> anthony: chef mike lata's restaurant fig was one of the first and most important on the charleston scene. determined to source the kind of local products that you used to find everywhere in the low country. as much as i'd like to illustrate that solid grounding and traditional ingredients and preparations with my order, i could not resist the soft shell crabs, which are just in season. with a pasta and shaved bottarga, which frankly, i'd slit my best friend's throat for. >> glenn: wow, that looks great. >> anthony: yeah. >> glenn: that's beautiful. >> anthony: it's sweet. when you had your first forkful of proper rice is there an instinct to go out and sort of bludgeon the rest of the world into understanding what you have just come to understand.

it would be really great for people in glenn canyon living on a house next to glenn canyon to have the reassurance the fire marshal has checked out that 30-foot area and given it his blessing that we are good. at least in so far as we are upholding the state standards, based upon what the state is telling us, nobody here should be worried. there may be a secondary project that may require more money. does san francisco want its own standards. we are dense on top of each other with the memory of the 1906 earthquake. there is kind of two things in there. i do think and what i present to you is a immediate task of doing the checking to make sure in areas with special concern like glenn canyon that, yes, at least as far as our current standards, san francisco has got this right and we checked. you can be absured about that. >> i don't remember 1906, but i remember 1989. if there are no other presenters, let's open this up to public comment. would you like to speak to item 3? thank you for spending your afternoon with us? >> coalition for san francisco neighborhoods. at the october general

glenn canyon? absolutely. the slope of the hill, proximity of the trees, canopies, the ground, the fuel on the ground. yes, we can on a case to case with experience with what is already out there derm what is a greater hazard than other areas. i don't know if that answers your question. >> this is not one size fits alsoution. whe-- fits alsoution. when there is a sidewalk and houses. it is more than 30 feet. it seems to me everything is about a defensible perimeter. the question is the standard is 30 but do we want to impose a larger perimeter, which would cut to denny's property, right? do we want to do a comprehensive assessment of all of our urban interfaces and derm these are places where 30 feet is right. these are places where we need a larger perimeter before the fire jumps. i assume glenn canyon the fire burns uphill. at the top it is crowned and moving. you are still going uphill. can it jump the street? >> doesn't have to jump the street? why? >> there are houses on the park side, too. >> to answer y

glenn, good to see you again.anks for sticking with us tonight. >>> coming up, how bernie sanders and elizabeth warren welcomed billionaire michael bloomberg to the democratic presidential race. that's next. 's next.ere's everyy to extremely happy. there's also angry. i'm really angry clive! actually, really angry. thank you. but what if your business could understand what your customers are feeling... and then do something about it. turn problems into opportunities. thanks drone. customers into fanatics change the whole experience. alright who wants to go again? i do! i do! i have a really good feeling about this. non-gmo, made with naturally sundown vitamins are all sourced colors and flavors and are gluten & dairy free. they're all clean. all the time. even if sometimes we're not. sundown vitamins. all clean. all the time. most people think of verizon as a reliable phone company. (woman) but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their busi

glenn. glenn. glenn. glenn. play. live. plenty. please. play. live. so. let's just split. the. playing. very well mark until you're watching us in such. banks guys are financial survival you know they say money to develop. a plan to take it easy this is a central plank support dying at the moment i don't call them right now it's a stop to. feel or or specter of socialism 30 years after the fall of the berlin wall social and is now remarkably popular what explains this how to explain why so many successful and even privileged people look to socialism to solve social problems maybe it's because liberalism itself is failing. the head off isis isn't decapitated by valid guys asia ideology is still there regrouping they have sleeping cells not on the hit in iraq but then syria too so we have to did with this problem after the fall of the long term as was bin ladin was the copy david but that was all true to so i think a certain logic applied to this terrorist organization which have a global to do. this is to put to good design a system to lessen the one who is going to do such a sy

glenn small, where is glenn?ou that if it weren't for glenn small dick's sporting goods wouldn't be here today. we lost our banking relationship with first city national bank years ago. kind of round the savings-and-loan crisis 1987 were the regulars got really tough and binghamton first city national bank said we can't bake you anymore. we never missed a loan payment we were never late, we cleaned up our line at the end of 30 days all the time but they said you got 60 days to get another loan, we can't bank any longer. we were always we always had drawn like we were always in debt to be able to fund our inventory and all that. larry sure said to me, there's a guy at binghamton savings bank name glenn small he should probably talk to him. maybe you can help out. i went and talked to glenn we sat down and told him what was going on and glenn and bill rinker from Ãbstepped up to provide us a line of credit in order for us to stay in business. if it hadn't been for glenn, binghamton savings bank taking a chance on u

. >> thank you joined by glenn fogle, ceo of booking holdings thank you for joining us here on "squawkey. >> thanks for having me. >> let's talk about some of the disruptors in travel the industry has long known about the ambitions of google in the travel industry but this quarter we really got to see the pain that google is starting to inflict. booking fared better than some of the others, but still your stock is down 10% in the month of november. expedia is down 30%. what's happening here? >> well, look, we are very happy with our third quarter numbers we came in 11% up year over year, better than the street expected earnings per share 20% adjusted eps. that's really good numbers we're happy with what's going on we like what we're doing some of our competitors may have had a little of a hiccup certainly they may depend more on google than we do one of the things that's very important to us is getting people to come to us direct, by providing a better service, something that customers want. we're able to have them come direct and people depending on google or anything else, that could

talking some real news i'm joined by my guest here in moscow he is a political analyst we also have glenn he's a professor at the higher school of economics as well as author of the decay of western civilization and resurgence of russia and we're joined by dmitry babich he's a political analyst and editor at you know it's me internet media project all right gentlemen crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciated you know over the course of this ridiculous russia gate. as we go into ukraine gate the mass media has been telling us if you used the term deep state or a conspiracy theorist ok something's changed though or you could say the deep state is finally beginning to speak with us into this video clip here gentlemen let's go thank god for the state. i think you know everyone here has seen this progression of diplomats and intelligence officers and white house people tripping up to capitol hill right now and saying these are people who are doing their duty you are responding to a higher call higher fall claim. he's making a reference to pe

i think gordon sondland better pay attention to that. >> glenn, a word on how close this roger stones he's convicted for was lying about a phone call that roger stone had with president trump. and it's one of those phone calls, a cellphone call during the campaign that's overheard by someone, in this case rick gates. >> how close did it get? it bumped right up against donald trump. because of that phone call, which showed, according to gates' testimony, that president trump was intimately involved in real time, courtesy of roger stone, with the wikileaks dump. so that sure looks more like just passively receiving information. it looks like coordination and it looks a lot like a conspiracy. >> glenn kirchner, thank you for doing double duty this week, covering the roger stone case for us all while we're all distracted with something else. really appreciate it, glenn. >> thank you, lawrence. >>> "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts right now. >>> tonight, another historic day of impeachment hearings in washington and a colossally bad day for donald trump. and then it got worse la

glenn: that is a good question.viously stretching for yields and we are yields and we are starting to see in the leveraged loan high-yield part, a deterioration in credit quality and associated terms. the big question is whether that creates systemic risk or the potential for market adjustment. a lot of this is at the corporate level and is not being provided by deposit making said a sense, so i'm not worried about systemic illness but i am not a buyer of high-yield at these terms. francine: is liquidity a concern in the markets, and could that be the symptom of something systemic? we saw it with the repo market, but by the end of the year it could provide something ugly. repo: the issues in the market suggests we have less liquidity than we originally thought. what i think is going on in large part is as a consequences -- consequence of all the we not around big banks, only have excess reserves but we have buffer reserves. banks keep a certain amount of reserves in buffer to manage their new capital requirements an

but glenn simpson is still doing his work.e has a new book out with his fusion gps co-founder and fellow "wall street journal" alum, peter fritsch. the book is called "crime in progress: inside the steele dossier and fusion gps investigation of donald trump." i've read kind of all the books on this subject. i mean, not like there's a whole library of them, but there's a number of books on this subject. this is the one you want to read. let me just give you this. one part here about the mueller report just to give you a little bit of flavor. "in the end, the mueller probe sidestepped the question that so unnerved fusion gps and christopher steele in the summer of 2016. was the president of the united states under the influence of a foreign adversary? as the dust settled on robert mueller's work and his desultory testimony before congress, several realities became clear. first the main lesson of watergate wasn't heeded. mueller did nor or was not allowed to follow the money. there's no indication in his report the investigation

we are completing a tree assessment on glenn canyon, glenn park and we have underway a tree assessment of stern grove, which is a large property with about 2500 trees that will be assessed out there. when we get the findings and recommendations in, as i said, those will compromise the work plan for accomplishing the recommendations in the upcoming fiscal year. switching now to reforestation, we have a reforestation guideline populous policy document that will outline the guidelines we will be following now and in the future for our maintain parkland. within that guideline document and also, as our performance measure within our own strategic plan of the department, our goal is to plant two trees for every one tree that gets remove on parkland. and it's important to point out when that occurs, we choose the tree-planting sites and not necessarily where the one tree was removed. we look to put the two trees in for the one tree that is coming out. necessarily, for example, if it was a large mature tree in a large mature stand of trees and that tree came out, there isn't enough sunlight ov

american initial interest i want to address this to both of you i think we need to stress a point that glenn has brought up here what i find really disturbing is how the liberal media is giving legitimacy to this in giving cover to because when we go to the deep state because we know that the origins of russia gate will be revealed to us we have durham we have a g. bar we have a number of reports coming in it seems to me that they're preempting this because the truth sayers on c.n.n. in m.s.m. d.c. are going to be true be shown to be liars and probably. people who have committed criminal offenses i think this is a well this really is already going we don't know that much and we're going to know the raid but one of the saying is that they're circling the wagons and using american metaphor because well if the purpose of the state is to put a check on the president 'd one must ask well what is the policy then of this in this in the intelligence community and that's very much they're committed to maintaining the status quo so. there's no one who is actually you know elected them can remove them

. >> glenn kirschner, i just want to give you kind of a wide open field for the prosecutors' view of david holmes' testimony. the thing that occurs to me is, wow, this is very sharp contradiction with gordon sondland, and this seems to put gordon sondland in some real trouble, real pressure with his testimony next week. >> it sure does, lawrence. and i have two quick observations, one on form and one on substance. i noticed he started with these words, i did not seek this opportunity to testify. can i tell you in my 30 years as a prosecutor i had so many witnesses come in and say mr. kirschner, i don't want to testify. and pretty much to a person when they said that you knew they were about to blow somebody up with some truthful incriminating testimony. so i think it actually enhances his credibility that he didn't seek out this opportunity to testify. now, on substance you've already related some of what -- some of the information provided. but there was one additional line that caught my attention. when sondland told mr. holmes, you know what, not only is he ready to do the investi

is common several neighbors in her area posted on facebook thwt glenn approach them as we he wants.for he wants to stick a sign in the yard so i guess he's trying to make you feel gets his benefit and the different things just to kind of build your confidence one of the most common and fruitful tactics cameras employee is taking advantage of people's emotions, especially when it comes to romance scams. >>and will hoyt sent $5600 to a scammer posing as a veteran on facebook the man claimed he needed the money to fly to tennessee vanessa weirich sent $5,000 to a man she met online who promised a large return on her investment at first, i thought it was a real nail, he seemed honest and trustworthy to thing scammers are not honest and trustworthy but they sure make it sound that way like those posing in law enforcement scams, they threatened fines arrest and even jail time just really made us feel vulnerable this summer someone pretended to be an animal control officer in cheatham county the person texted la's west clming distressed animals had been reported at her home and requested a

glenn, you build prosecution cases for a living. look at the democrats' plan, specifically using vindman, taylor and yovanovitch as their key witnesses. what do you think. >> steph, they must have some pretty good prosecutors advising them on tactics, because here's why. when we investigate cases, we investigate expansively, and that results in us running down a lot of dead end alleys, talking with a lot of knucklehead witnesses. but then once you prove the case in court or in an impeachment hearing, you want to prove the case narrowly. so, i think what the house is doing is exactly right tactically, because think about it, if you put like a corey lewandowski on the stand, he's not going to persuade the people of anything. i mean, if he tells me his name is corey lewandowski, i want to see his driver's license as corroboration. we saw his clownish performance, but once the american people get to see career patriots who really are law-abiding, they take their oath seriously, and you can trust when they relate facts to you under oath,

glenn, let me start with you because you were in that room. was it like when that jury came back? >> you know, first of all, chris, i think it was fully expected given the strength of the evidence. roger stone, he really seemed deflated and defeated throughout the trial, and that was especially so when the jury started announcing its guilty verdicts. but i'll tell you it really does seem like today is witness tampering day in trump world. we -- as you mentioned, the jury convicted stone of five counts of lying to congress, one count of obstructing an official proceeding and one count of witness tampering for basically trying to convince congress that randy credico, a long time friend of his, was his go-between to wikileaks and julian assange when roger stone's own e-mail and text messages proved randy credico wasn't the go-between. it was an uphill battle for the defense attorneys to prove roger stone was telling the truth to congress. mind you the way he tampered with randy credico was pretty serious because he said things like prepare to die

>> i think glenn will agree. you don't want to overcharge.we've tried cases as prosecutors, glenn and i, we don't overcharge on an indictment because sometimes you lose it all. i think with respect to the comments made by alex's guest, the reality is, the impeachment concept has always been in place since the beginning of when it was put in our constitution for purposes of preventing an abuse of power by the president. what you're going to have is the house intel committee prepares a report. then the house judiciary committee prepares the actual articles of impeachment. but when the fact that you've got ten examples of obstruction of justice in the mueller report and the fact that wepompeo, the reality is going to be the president going to be hard-pressed to prove that he did not commit crimes that merit conviction, let alone impeachment. >> glenn, an article on the hill details how the white house's efforts to block critical witnesses from testifying has given him a victory by creating successful stalemate. how crucial are there statements a

like glenn just said there is an attorney/client relationship there, alex.s to be donald trump, but if there's crime fraud exception to be applied here, i couldn't get a better example of how to apply it. giuliani has to tread carefully. frankly giuliani on his destruction of credibility tour this is the next stop apparently. the fact that he is threatening flea has insurance on his client is problem for both of this em. >> glenn, do you think he gets indict snd. >> i think there's a very good chance particularly if lev parnas flips and based on what parnas' lawyer is saying it looks like that that may happen. >> we will see. glenn and katie, thanks so much. >>> the case of a navy seal accused of murder, how it's causing a rift between military brass and president trump. that's next. etween milarity brass and president trump. that's next. thousands of women with metastatic breast cancer, which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of the body, are living in the moment and taking ibrance. ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor is for postmenopausal wom

glenn kershner who practiced law for more than 30 years.ition s of these things, i you look up things of quid pro quo or bribery, they overlap and the definition tends to be similar. is there any wiggle room here? >> ali, first of all, it does not matter for impeachment purposes if there is or is not a quid pro quo. here is why i say that. we see from the transcripts. we have heard from colonel vindman of a summary of what he testified to behind closed doors. there was a quid pro quo. even if there was not, it could be an impeachable offense. let's assume a hypothetical. president trump withheld $400 million that had been appropriated by congress to go to ukraine to defend against russian aggression. he withheld it because he liked russia better than he liked ukraine so no quid pro quo, he didn't ask for anything of president zelensky, he just decided to withhold money that congress had designated to go to ukraine. that's an abusive power absent of quid pro quo. so, let's move forward to what is a quid pro quo under the facts as we know the

it doesn't fly, in my opinion. >> all right, katie phang, glenn kirsch snare, thank you.e'll talk about how the gop witness list could turn the hearings into a circus. we'll see how that goes. we've got the letter here and we'll dig into that. >>> the warren tax proposal, is it just a small price to pay for america's money class? the bottom line coming up. america's money class? the bottom line coming up. >> you may have heard some billionaires on tv recently crying about that 2-cent wealth tax. aw. aw. aw great riches will find you when liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. wow. thanks, zoltar. how can i ever repay you? maybe you could free zoltar? thanks, lady. taxi! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ a wealth of information. a wealth of perspective. ♪ a wealth of opportunities. that's the clarity you get from fidelity wealth management. straightforward advice, tailored recommendations, tax-efficient investing strategies, and a dedicated advisor to help you grow and protect your wealth. fidelity

joining me to explain whether these intersect at all is msnbc legal contributor katie phang and glennhner. let's jump into it. katie, starting with you because you are a floridians. is this a good legal tactic? does this help him avoid providing his new york tax returns? >> frances, we have to shortage of florida man and pay patiently trump is about to become the consummate florida man. we are a debtor friendly state, no state income tax, no estate taxes, we are dead judgment debtor friendly. if there was the fraud capital of the united states it is florida. it's no big surprise that donald trump wants to come here but he does have a problem. just because you move to florida does not cut off at the knees the current litigation that he has in new york, that he has over in california, that he has in d.c., that he has the emolument clause litigation, but fundamentally the move to florida does signify that trump is trying to flee so what he considers to be one of his strongest support bases. florida has been a very vocal supporter of donald trump, the voters have come out in droves when h

glenn, there is yet another new issue for the white house. i want to play just a sort of set this up, some of what we heard from gordon sondland about a key conversation he had with president trump. >> i believe i just asked him an open ended question mr. chairman. what do you want from ukraine? i keep on hearing all these different ideas and theories and this and that. what do you want? it was a short abrupt conversation. he was not in a good mood. he just said i want nothing. i want no quid pro quo. tell zelensky to do the right thing. something to that effect. >> this has been a key talking point for the president for his supporters, i said clearly no quid pro quo. but now "the washington post" is reporting they're in documents to corroborate the description of that call or records in the white house's call logs. they muddles this this up furt. >> the fact that president trump announced he did not commit the crime after he was caught committing the crime is not all that persuasive, phone record supporting it or not. what we know is the mos

juicy deliciousness, glenn kirschner. what do you think he means? >> i think it's pretty sad the way john bolton is going about sort of putting these things in the public square. i mean, plus one point for bolton for telling dr. fiona hill, go report this to the nsc lawyers because i'm not going to be part of the sondland/mulvaney drug deal, that is the illegal bribery scheme that was headed up by donald trump. so, plus one point there. now, minus two points for, one, not walking down yourself. we don't know if he did it. not walking down yourself and reporting it to the nsc lawyers. but even worse than that, for him to kind of throw out these teasers, rather than, i'd like to use the term manning up, but i think after we've seen dr. hill and marie yovanovitch, i think the more appropriate word is woman up, and get in front of congress, get in front of the american people and testify. >> well, is there something to his argument that i'm waiting to see if i can? in other words, can he -- is there a different choice john bolton can make? he seems to h

glenn simpson and peter fritch are the co-expounders of fusion gps. "crime in progress: inside the investigation into donald trump." welcome, both. glenn, can you set people straight about the so-called steele dossier and why you think it's being used by republicans, by the president, by house republicans, devin nunes certainly, to try to undermine the mueller report and a lot of the conclusions that go into the theory that ukraine was involved somehow in targeting the president and not -- something i should point out, not just the intelligence community consensus but also the bipartisan consensus of the senate, republican-led senate intelligence committee in only recent months. >> essentially, because the steele dossier was a piece of campaign research that was when we were working for hillary clinton and the democrats, they think that by pointing that out over and over again, they can delegitimize everything that happened after that. as you point out, that's just not right. it's not accurate to say that the fbi investigation into the trump campaign

glenn, i'll start with you. we may be a few weeks away from learning from the articles of impeachment are. what could be the main article? obstruction, abuse of power, contempt of congress? >> yes, yes, s rk, yes and yes. >> what he was trying to do with ukraine is the centerpiece and perhaps the main article of impeachment. it's hard to ignore so many of the other corrupt acts that the president has undertaken. as i heard congressman swalwell say recently, trump's got priors. that's something we only say about a defendant in a criminal proceeding. when you sort of look not in isolation at what he tried to do with ukraine to have them fabricate an investigation against joe biden, trump's political opponent, he also did something similar with russia. hey, russia, if you're listening, find the 30,000 missing emails, that, of course, inspired, russia to interfere in the 2016 election. on the other side, the other book end, when the president was on the white house lawn, he said not only do i want ukraine to look in

plus former federal prosecutor and legal analyst glenn kirschner. tell us what you think stood out over what was -- could be the final week, right? some of the headlines, the takeaways have been fairly large. on one, we learned about a emails and a new call. so many different things you can take away from this week. >> one of the most striking things was how many witnesses fiona hill really struck down the idea that ukraine is the country that interfered. it is the very narrative that the republicans hung on. so this idea, this counternarrative that it was really ukraine that was trying to interfere in the election, the fact that that indeed complete o obligate rated this week is key to how the president to say that it's true. >> andy on the hill here. we saw adam schiff close out the week, and he did it with a lot of emotion and he quoted one of his former colleagues, all of us were watching it there. are we going to get potentially more hearings, more testimonies without necessarily being in the same process that we saw in the last two weeks? >> t

he will not take the fall for donald trump. >> glenn, to katie's point.id holmes' testimony confirms sondland's phone call where a biden investigation was discussed. now a second official can reportedly corroborate the accounts. how significant would this be if sondland admits to the phone call and its content when he testifies publicly on wednesday? >> yeah. i mean, holmes' testimony really gives sondland no wiggle room. that's why he has to think long and hard whether he should invoke the fifth. we haven't seen a witness invoke the fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. in an investigation like this, that can be a pretty dramatic moment. he's between a rock and a hard place. if he testifies fully and truthfully, he will expose himself in two ways. one, he will show he was lying to congress previously and he neglected to include this when he corrected the record. and two, he is also exposing himself in a potential conspiracy to defraud the united states by unfairly interfering with an election. so what is he going to do? it's anybody's guess.

vern glenn will be in attendance. the bengals take on? it will be mostly in the 70s around the bay area. 79 for morgan hill. plenty of sunshine in the east bay. the 680 corridor has numbers in the mid 70s . up in the north bay, it will be nice. it will nudge 80 degrees in santa rosa. mill valley, 75. and novato, 74. i used to live in novato. great little town. 82 ukiah. 84 cloverdale. in the extended forecast, sunshine for sunday and monday. then it cools down. tuesday through the latter half of the week. the numbers come down. but, no rain does. at least not yet. that's weather. for sports, here is mr. vern glenn. >>> i get to bring you two-fer saturday night. not just one sports segment. but two! hey, and ahead, pac-12 local teams, desperate for wins. if they want to keep playing, come bowl season. the headliner? cal an >>> college football up top. the main ingredient on a saturday. first stop, the paloose. stanford starting quarterback, kj costello couldn't go again at washington state. second quarter grab. easop winston with his finge

glenn? >> i think this phone call now with sondland saying ukraine is ready to move forward, how do we interpret that? bribery successful, mission accomplished. that's what that is. and i agree with cynthia, i love all of the facts and i love an overarching story and an inclusive tale being told by heroes like bill taylor. 50 years, i get patriotic goose bumps listening to that guy. but now we need a message. we need to tell it like it is because what this is arms for political dirt. and i think -- we've heard no obstruction, no collusion, which was a lie. we heard perfect call, perfect call which was a lie. but the truth is this is arms for political dirt. that's the message. >> right. and every time there's a question it has to go back to that. every question. if the president said this, that was a lie, wasn't it? because in fact what was happening he was trading arms for dirt. >> majority members they weren't going off about emoluments or some other little tangent they did stick to the qu

glenn simpson and free peter explained their investigation into president trump into the creation. the profiles to the late democratic congressman. also being published this week jacobs explains how he went from a professional wrestler to the mayor of knox county tennessee and mayor kane. the former acting solicitor argues that removing a president trump from office is the best way to protect democracy and watch for many of the authors in the near future. what do you do for a living. i do writing on our website. i do writing

glenn, these justices, they have tried to avoid taking sides on this issue.f they decline to take up the case, how significant is that? >> it is very significant, alex, and because katie is much better with the details than i am, i'm going to pull back to 30,000 feet and try to do a 30-second constitutional law 101 class. so every year the supreme court gets about 7,000 requests to have cases reviewed. they only accept review in about 100 to 150 cases each year. there are basically two reasons, the supreme court would accept review of a case, one is the case presents unique constitutional questions that are maybe unresolved, so the supreme court feels compelled to accept review of that kind of case and resolve it. the other area where they accept review is when two federal circuit courts have decided the same or very similar issues in different ways such that we now have a conflict among the circuits so they will accept review of a case like that to resolve the conflict. this case presents either of those two issues. >> yeah. i'm thinking neither one fits. >>

glenn simpson and peter fritsch. only i, but so many -- having you here feels like a turn of the tables. in the prologue, you make clear this is only possible essentially because of the investigations of you, because of the way congress came after you. can you explain that? >> well, the republicans controlled washington for two years, all of washington for two years, and they used that time to investigate the investigators and dig into us and waste enormous amounts of money trying to find something on us that would discredit us rather than investigating the russian attack on our election and our democracy. >> and the consequence of that materially for you, you're essentially freed up to talk about some things that would otherwise be confidential client matters? >> that's absolutely right. we respect our covenants with our clients. in this case, the democratic national committee and the hillary for president campaign. we were not able to talk about those things for a long time and in the meantime, faced a lot of press

that is mostly o on the west sie of the boulevard as it comes down towards glenn canyon. not the east side but on the west side, which is your district, supervisor yee. then we have sunse sunset reser. these bottom four. the next slide. i am not sure if everyone knows where they are. we also have four areas, all in a close together location within san francisco. to orient everybody on the left of the photo we have the laguna reservoir. that is one of the larger areas in the city. we don't quite have large areas like pc opened and san mateo counties. we have large watershed lands. there are 27.75-acres. we have number two on this slide here. right across the street from clarendon elementary school. we have the summit reservoir up the hi hill. then we have our twin peaks which is number four. the only reservoir feeding to the emergency firefighting water system. i want to orient everyone to where they are located. what are the proactive measures we are taking on these lands? removing leaf litter, underbrush, creating fuel breaks 30 to 100 feet, managing grass lands and shru