gregg jarrett, thank you. straight ahead tonight, after botching every aspect of the pandemic and its response, flip-flop found she is finally stepping down in december. senator kennedy has thoughts. later, jared kushner reveals things about the trump white house you have never heard before. he will be with us straight ahead as we continue. >> sean: dr. doom and gloom flip-flop fauci announced his departure from the national allergy and infectious disease center say that he's ready to start the next phase of his career. isn't it kind of interesting that fauci is leaving days after the cdc chief announced a massive agency shake-up is coming? they admitted to massive failures in terms of our countries covid response? don't you think these two things aren't connected? you may want to think again if you do because they most certainly are. fauci still needs to be held accountable for all of the lies and misdirection of his flip-flopping on masks, saying vaccines will stop all transmission, et cetera, not really foc

gregg jarrett, alan dershowitz join us with the latest coming up next. ♪ ♪ demands a lotion this pureld bond pure moisture lotion 24-hour hydration no parabens, dyes, or fragrances gold bond champion your skin ♪ ♪ >> pete: welcome back to the special edition of "hannity." it tonight, it's good to be a biden in the washington swamp. of fbi whistle-blowers are telling senator ron johnson of wisconsin that high-ranking officials inside the bureau prohibited agents from investigating hunter biden and his laptop from heck. they could not investigate and were told until after the 2020 election. that's not all, according to mark zuckerberg, the fbi contacted facebook in 2020 and warned of russia propaganda. just as the hunter biden laptop story emerged. watch. >> there was a lot of attention on twitter during the election because of the hunter biden laptop story. you guys center that as well? >> we took a different path than twitter. basically the background is the fbi came to us and some folks on our team saying, hey, as you know, you should be on high alert that we thought there was a lot

professor dershowitz, and gregg jarrett. coming up, the doj is doing damage control over the tactics they used in peter navarro's arrests. we will tell you the updated peter will join us. also, paul manafort will react as he releases his book, "political prisoner today." straight ahead. ♪ ♪ this isn't just freight. these aren't just shipments. they're promises. promises of all shapes and sizes. each, with a time and a place they've been promised to be. a promise is everything to old dominion, because it means everything to you. ♪ ♪ >> sean: on other day with yet another example of our two-tiered justice system. you know, we don't have equal justice or application of our laws any longer. get this, the biden doj is now claiming the heavy-handed arrest tactics used against peter navarro back in june at an airport or completely reasonable and appropriate, calling him a "on particular subject." remember, peter navarro was arrested while getting on an airplane, put in handcuffs. he was then taken, strip-searched, put in leg irons

alina, gregg jarrett, thank you. when we come back, speaking of whistle blowers our very own jim jordan congressman of ohio says he talked to five of them and he'll explain why he's opening a congressional inquiry into the doj inspector general's office and much more as our coverage continues. stay with us. ♪ jj >> [bushes rustling] [door opening] ♪dramatic music♪ yes! hon! the weathertech's here. ♪ weathertech is the ultimate protection for your vehicle. laser-measured floorliners... no drill mudflaps... cargoliner... bumpstep... seat protector... and cupfone. ♪ what about my car? weathertech. hi, my name's steve. i lost 138 pounds on golo and i kept it off. golo's changed my life in so many ways. before, i was over 300 pounds. now, i literally have the ability to take a shirt off and go out in the sun where i would have never done that before. try golo. it works. every search you make, every click you take, every move you make, every step you take, i'll be watching you. the internet doesn't have to be duckduckgo is

here the reaction, fox news contributor jason chaffetz along with fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett you examples, number one, they never got to the bottom. we now know on four separate occasions even though it says verified at the top of the fisa warrant, they are using the disinformation dossier that was completely unverifiable, after it was debunked they had hunter biden's laptop and didn't do a thing with it. now we have the fbi whistle-blowers and they don't seem to be paying much attention to him either. nor did they pursue justice for the people that were rioting. 574 riots in the summer of 2020. seems like it is one-sided to me. >> there is no equal application of the law, merrick garland, multiple whistle-blowers have come forward with compelling and incredible evidence that there was a scene amongst senior fbi officials to bury and hide incriminating evidence of hunter biden's influence peddling, although at the same time, deliberately and falsely portraying the laptop and it's contents as russian disinformation, knowing full well that it wasn't. and then they hid all of th

attorney brett tolman and fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. thank you for joining us. you are a former u.s. attorney. i will start with you. i cannot get past the fact that a judge less than two months ago had to recuse themselves. we don't know why, but had to recuse himself from a trump issue and less than two months later he is making this ruling. i don't get how that happens in today's legal system. cino jason, if the recusal came as a result of the political connection between this judge and hillary clinton, which most likely it was, then it really is outrageous that he would not recuse himself when the main political adversary of hillary clinton, obama and biden and anyone on the left as former president donald trump you would have thought it would have applied also in this circumstance especially in the criminal law when there's a lot more on the line. >> craig, i love the piece you wrote on fox news.com, but essentially they were giving a fishing license to go to town on donald trump's residents. what is your reed on what you read in the affidavit? >> this is w

joining now pam bondi's with us for commentary as well as fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett.r take on all of this? >> having personally as a prosecutor for 18 years signed thousands of subpoenas, thousands them a many times people don't comply. you either issue a new subpoena or do a motion to compel. why was that not done in this case? the trump people were working well with them and why wasn't that dumb? that's a question for merrick garland. number two, the warrant, think about the warrants. if you're going to issue a warrant, the reason has to be i'm worried they are going to destroy evidence. what suspect about that is that we learned that the warrant was signed on friday, but not executed until monday. why get the warrant? that doesn't make sense. i've personally been involved in many, many search warrants authorizing them, the execution of the search warrant and they came in with guns blazing like you said. for documents, you know what you do? you go up and show the warrant at mar-a-lago, they knew the president wasn't there, it's a skeleton crew and you go in and you

let's ask gregg jarrett, fox news legal analyst.s hanged over to the judge and he said looks good to me? i was somewhat surprised by that. what do you read into that? >> well, i agree with you. you know, the impeerist merrick garland takes the attitude that americans aren't entitled to ask questions just trust us given their abysmal track record especially in lying to courts while seeking the magistrate gave garland until noon today. one of two things will happen garland will either seek a stay from a higher court pending an appeal or he will cherry pick certain parts of the affidavit that are totally adverse to donald trump while obscuring evidence of, perhaps, omissions of exculpatory evidence by the fai or outright misrepresentations. so i'm not optimistic we are going to get anything mean meaningful. >> brian: so we know this, this is what they wanted to redact and the judge says that's reasonable so i guess the judge would ultimately decide if that's going to go forward. you say the doj is going to decide if that goes public? i

i will give my own thoughts on this in just a moment with fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett but firstp, let's turn to ashley webster who is live from palm beach, florida, with the latest. ashley, what you got? >> reporter: tell you what, larry, it is the day after the big raid. i think people are still pretty

reaction, donald trump with the intel committee and let's start "the wall street journal" and gregg jarrett pointed it out on air last night, and that is the federal records act actually gives authority to a former president to have custody and control of presidential papers. now when you accompany that with the timeline that we know of that is february, and the archives and records administration was praising the trump team for that cooperation and in june everything they wanted to see. and would you mind pad locking this room? and they didn't, when he put all of that together and the president's ability to declassify, where did they get the president on any legal issue here? >> i don't think that they did get him on any legal issue here and that was the headline of "the wall street journal" yesterday which was dead on accurate. you have to have a legal basis. this is not the gastric's. this is our country and the constitution. and what we saw with what we just discussed is that they are hiding the doj memos and like to see them and reject them, and when push makes shove, it is not a favor

. >> todd: brooke, thank you gregg jarrett things attorney garland had an ulterior motive and here is why. because there is no enforcement provision of the records act. it is not crime. so what did merrick garland do? he tossed in three general moral general criminal status. wait a minute under law for more than 100 years in america and specific statute like the records act takes precedent and supersedes any general steps. again, merrick garland knew that but wanted to gain access to trump's compound for an ulterior motive to look for some evidence, any evidence of the different crime or maybe something related to january 6th. so, he tossed out a general warrant, which is a clear violation of the fourth amendment which requires it to be specific. >> todd: turning out to this, israel urging the biden administration to reject the iran nuclear deal after the state department signaled the u.s. could be willing to renegotiate. >> carley: is really defenseman will be in washington to sway officials to walk away from the obama era run nuclear deal. senior advisor to the ambassador of israel

here with reaction, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett along with warmer white house chief of staffo logical sense to defund, dismantle or no bail laws, none whatsoever. but it is being adopted by every blue state and it seems like every blue city in america and it has gone viral and they seem fine with it. i'm having a hard time understanding why they think that's a good issue to run on. >> it is not a good issue, sean. if you look at the number one and number two issues across to america, you alluded in the last segment its crime and inflation. that's why you have governor candidates across this country and in your state in new york talking about firing district attorneys on day 1 in wisconsin and other states. look at the crime rate in portland up 800%. philly, d.c., i mean, you name it. but here's the interesting thing about these democrats. the proof is in the pudding, because there is two things that come out in the last month that totally debunk what the democrats have been talking about, and that is two things. number one, stacey abrams, how much money has she spent on perso

here now with more, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett, harvard law professor alan dershowitz is with gregg we will start with you. if you look at the present of the records act, which is what we are told this is all about -- i mean, i assume there's a chance that maybe classified documents were taken to mar-a-lago. i understood from reports that there was a process that they were going through. they said they were willing to give all those things back. why didn't they just say can we come over and take a look at what you have and make sure that there's no classified documents or? just like why didn't they say to peter navarro, his attorney, have your client report at 8:00 a.m. at this location, or paul manafort or roger stone? why the big show only when it's a conservative? >> because it's donald trump and this is the weaponization for political purposes by the fbi and the department of justice. you are right, sean, when you identify the presidential records act of 1968 -- '78, which is far from a model of clarity, and in fact it's one of the more opaque laws will ever read. one of t

liz peek, gregg jarrett, tom homan the 10:00 o'clock hour of varney is next. ♪ .. coverage the stock market does. in fact, most people don't find them all that exciting. but, if you're looking for the potential for consistent income that's federally tax-free, now is an excellent time to consider municipal bonds from hennion & walsh. if you have at least 10,000 dollars to invest, call and talk with one of our bond specialists at 1-800-763-2763. we'll send you our exclusive bond guide, free. with details about how bonds can be an important part of your portfolio. hennion & walsh has specialized in fixed income and growth solutions for 30 years, and offers high-quality municipal bonds from across the country. they provide the potential for regular income... are federally tax-free... and have historically low risk. call today to request your free bond guide. 1-800-763-2763. that's 1-800-763-2763. stuart: there is, the front of the building which is truly ugly. good morning to you. it is not as bad as it was. the dow is down, the 10 year treasury yield moving up 288 is

gregg jerick. jarrett grassley says new whistleblower info reveals deeply rootedlitica political infection within infei. al infection within can the can the american peoplef trust that the fbibi and the dod are committed to equal justice and equal application ofg our laws? because i'm i'm feelinthey't g they can't have that confidence that we need to have. trust is earned and the fbi and the department of justice a have squandered any trust.ny and ye t you've got merrick garland standing in front of cameras saying trust the fbi, how dare anybody question their integrity. we'll look at their traceir tray record . i mean, this is there fbi thatga had a lawyer who doctored evidence to gain a warrant to spy on the trump campaign. the fbi paid an ex british spyie to conjure up phony evidence that the fbi knew was bogus and yet they ran with it. this is tho e fbi who had a director, james comey, who stole government documents them them to the media,cuments admittedly for the purpose ofer triggeringa a special co

. >> brian: bring in gregg jarrett fox news legal analyst. greg, i spoke to eric last night.ily has not seen the affidavit. has not seen the warrant yet. they flashed it to a lawyer on the premises. how unusual is that? >> normally the recipient would only see the warrant itself. not the supporting materials, which are sworn affidavits by fbi officials or others who give sustenance to the probable cause that evidence of a crime exists at mar-a-lago and trump's residence there. i think it is important -- i understand that there is always a policy of non-transparency during the course of an investigation. this is such an extraordinarily aggressive move by the department of justice and the fbi that i really do think that merrick garland deserves the american public some answers to -- americans are -- they care deeply about fairness. they have a strong moral character. and they find repub nant thuggish authoritarianism and this smacks of it. >> ainsley: they hate uneven justice. >> yes. >> ainsley: what do you make about this magistrate judge not a federal judge appointed by a pr