all with very accurate gss and other entities and they are all doing it with very precise intel. they are doing so side-by-side in full collaboration. we are slowly but surely dismantling the framework, the military framework of hamas. we are heading at they're in for structure underground, overground, the actual leaders of the hamas. and time and time again, we see evidence, for example, the terrorists immediately tell us what has been happening there. during this entire time, something else has been achieved while the idf are maneuvering in the actual in gaza, they are creating that outline. they are paving the way for this agreement and that is the way, that is the reason that i actually recommended that we should go in and we should go into the depths of gaza because then there is a better chance to be able to bring back our hostages. we are talking about animals. we are talking about really heinous crimes they committed. and we have to show them what is the capability of the idf and create an outline that would bring our hostages back. as long as they progress into the actua

i think you all, my ministers, all of you, the chief of general staff and ahead of the gss and the headorked tirelessly, burning them who worked tirelessly, burning the midnight oil to bring them home. citizens of israel, i want to be clear. the war is ongoing, it is gun continuing, we will continue it until we achieve all our objectives. we will eliminate hamas, and we would ensure that the day after hamas, there will be no factor who will continue educating their children to hate and to eradicate israel. so, we will continue in anonymity and hamas in the north, by the way and in the south amount we will continue that effort until we have an absolute victory. and we are doing so it thanks of the heroism and the courage of our children. they are truly the heroes of israel, and i always remember, because this victory has a very heavy price that we have to pay. there are those who lose their lives, who have given their lives, sacrificed their lives for us, for our safety and security. i spoke to the family of the young paratrooper who died this week, and the father told me that you wrote

and collaboration of the ground forces, air forces, and those from the sea, all with very accurate gss and other entities, and they are all doing it with very precise intel. and they are doing so side by side in full collaboration. we are slowly but surely dismantling the framework, the military framework of the hamas. we are hitting at their infrastructure, underground, overground, the actual leaders of the hamas, and time and time again we see evidence and for example, the terrorists immediately tell us what has been happening there. and during this entire time, something else has been achieved. while the idf are remove ring in the actual... in gaza. —— are manoeuvring in gaza. that is the reason that i actually recommended to the knesset that we should go ended we should go in the depths of gaza because then there is a greater chance to be able to bring back our hostages. we are talking about animals, we're talking about really heinous crimes that they committed, and these we have to show them what is the capability of the idf and create an out line that will bring our hostages back

everything to the best of ourabilities, not we will do everything to the best of our abilities, not only the gss know why sheet was separated from her mother? after this is against all the agreements that were made. we're talking about a murderous terror organisation that separates families, murders families, took children like abigail. so at long last we have brought her home. but she is orphan from her parents who were murdered in such a cruel manner. we will bring them all home, that is our aspiration, that is what we're striving to do. we will bring as many as possible. this is the phase we're at at the moment. we're doing it night and day, burning the midnight oil and we're doing so in such a way, wielding pressure on all the sources that were supposed to be wielding pressure on. we will do so and hopefully we will put that pressure on the mediators so that we will ensure that all of those that should be brought homes will be brought home. in this way or another way. from time to time israel's signed various agreements with a mouse with the help of mediators. —— help of mediators. —— with h

we've got a headquarters with intel, with a idf that his being led by that, also the gss and the mossad we are talking about major general newtown alone who he is running it. and ensuring that our hostages phase by phase will be returned and only then do we actually update the public. so of course, this is exactly like an operation and we are working on it as such. and then we have to update these families who are in such difficulty, it's a real nightmarish situation so they have to bear with us patiently and any information will have to be verified and only then we will actually convey that information if it has not been verified, of course not. but anything that is been discussed or anything that is been discussed or anything that is been discussed or anything that happens, we will analyse them and of course inform everyone. analyse them and of course inform eve one. ~ . analyse them and of course inform eve one. . ., ., ,, ., everyone. whatever happened today, will it impact — everyone. whatever happened today, will it impact what _ everyone. whatever happened today, will it impact w

moving left to right, we have global gss domestic product which you can tell is growing rapidly. in the middle, we have primary energysage. you can see an upward end and finally to the right, we ve energy related co2missions. in each of these three panels, thbounds othe greatands are due to the macro cases. they are setting the bounds on each of these. as you look from left to right, you notice the slope of the cone keeps decreasing. gdp is growing the fastest and finally energy related co2 has the least slope. to get more insight, we can further break those three panels down into four panels. some of you might recognize this as the tms in the kaya identity. we have globalopation. there is no gray van because one population projection carries thugall of the cases that we are modeling. next we have gdp per capita which you can take to be a rough measure of per capita annual income. nexte have energy intensity which is a measure of energy per dollar gdp and finally carbon intensity which is the amount of carbon emissions you get. the uncertainty in the two middle councils are being

gss i'm asking, whyot look to the history andee historical evidence with this being first amendment liberty on the stage the government to do what it wants and it is a difficult road. i'm not sure why i nd to tangle with anything. >> the historical evidence sufficient to decide theas in our favor, we don't object to the. >> just checking. [laughter] m behe public doctrine. justice thosnd briar said atn the case and justice owr mayor subplot. in many cases, will not be solely on the history but on the box. >> there is an analogy in both trademark and provision of public fum. forms of government assistance thataybe useful but not essential. the only reason i hesitate to embrace further is theriipal register o which these marks areisted, it is not having your name o the it is communicating to the public. it is morning potential ability if they similar remarks. >> if you want to go down this road, i think tt you are related gernment assistance in the way justice soto mayor wrote but if we wereo go down the road lucidly, why wouldn't the registration program is the form? it's not the register, i

. >> i gss this is a flaw and i don't really know what that means other than is it reasonable, what'she difference? >> it's used different and put the test differently in different cases. >> ino the formulation. i just -- in the end, congress thinks it's appropriate to put a restriction on people profiting offnd justice gorsuch detailed, that's long been congress' view and even before the statute has been part of a lawor and -- that , you poe, we st have to make a judgment. i don't know showing t term inrmediate scrutiny around does nothi f me. >> i think that'st fair. ha i would say whether it's reasonableness or intermediate scrutiny i think the burden should be onhe government to try to justify the law. >> i guess identify just -- i've said it and others have said it a judgment that you shouldn't be able to profit use off o somebody else's ne. >> i'm just saying that i tnk, you know, really a burden -- yeah. i think what's so unusual here the governmen hn't really tried to show why the juifation would be, what real-world harm is sor of being worked by, the registration here as oppo

an innovative chemical recycling caincompany that can -- gss facilities can accept plastic ranging fromingle use to fishing nets. it is exactly —-dash the exact type of person we need here today. .... .... about addressing plastic waste. so i appreciate it once again. innovation, not misguided regulation is the correct way to move forward but i look forward to hearing from all of our witnesses today on ways we can facilitate this. and it looked more serious about chemical recycling and commercial skills. without a deal back. >> thank you very much. mr. erickson. >> good morning subcommittee chair, ranking member and all community members. cofounder researcher of the firewood gyrus institute. white sailed around the world to study ocean plastic pollution letting 20 expeditions across all oceans we have collected thousands of samples o like the one that is right here you can see it's mostly micro plastics. we recently published about six months ago a study looking at a 40 year trend from late 70s until present and i will show you a graphic for a published paper the first 25 years in 1980

driven from people businesses in their home, beaten in the streets, women couldn't get on the subway to gsses ando anywhere.aab wa i mean, it was disgusting to watch. you couldn't take your children outside withouy with t and encampmentse everywhere. but when the money comes, let'y. be honest. that's what this is. these are the guys who cut checks to the lobbyist ysscks to the lobbyist and filter the money. and they cleaned up. they're going to clean up the whole place. and the saddest part they leanet day, i not know that the night as soon as gigi, the crew the go back to where they go, they'll be cleaning up those fences and all that.d literally, they'll be back. yeah. and then you'll have a whole you'lll be bac have weeks more of violence while they reestablish the territories and fightingorii stuff. and they're gonna be like, oh, sorry. we just, you know, we don't oh, sorry, w fort. we don't >> it sorry guys. they probably didn't even clean up the . they just stored iy t and,ored you know, just bring it. they'll just bring the back out. we got to get the back out there. uld ha >> but they

. >> gss i'm a little confused as to what is at stake because i ar you saying now it isn't a tter of appearances andha a reasonable person might me mistake which is kind of the ninth circuit'seasoning. it does boil down the reasoning and of the authority and y're positingha those include beyond what's in the handbook. but i understood to say exactly the same thing. so the test that everybody more or less agrees on? >> i want to be cle i was talking about the duties d authorities in the context of the justices question. we think that the appearance and futi is also relevanto whether someone is engag in state action. i took her question to b if you take the sixth circuit verbiage. is there a problem wit it? this discussio does seem like it's coalesced around in understanding of duties and thorities and there's some discussion about how capacious iss to b but here's the one thing that worries me there and it goes bac t theourt's decision in 1912ut also involves things they a forbidden to do in the course of ei job and nonetheless acting under the law. given that, do you see a problem wi

firmed into the senate on june 2321. 11,000 gss acquisition solutions to management of public and leastings. she led the senate and local government practice and orientation within gsa with government agencies with government solutions. also serving the state of missouri secretary of state from 2005 to 2013. pursuant to committee rule 9 g will you please stand and raise your right hand. do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is a truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you god. let the witness know answering in the affirmative. we appreciate you being today and look forward to your testimony. >> good morning ranking member. my name is robin carnahan government work better. saving money while we do it is our north star. the federal government's real estate footprint. making it easier, faster and cheaper for agencies to buy goods and services. using simple secure and accessible digital services for the public. my written testimony goes into greater detail about how we are working to achieve these goals. i want to highlight some of the oppo