chair of the committee, harriet harman. mr speaker, it is a | harriet harman.et harman. mr speaker, it is a privilege to follow _ harriet harman. mr speaker, it is a privilege to follow the _ harriet harman. mr speaker, it is a privilege to follow the right - privilege to follow the right honourable lady, the memberfor maidenhead in her serious and important speech, every word of which i agreed with. the evidence on which i agreed with. the evidence on which our conclusions are based is fully set out in the report. i want to place on record the great debt of gratitude i believe the house owes it to the clerks of the house, to speakers' council and to sir ernest ryder. the quality of their work and their dedication to the house is extraordinary. they are public servants of a quite remarkable calibre. the evidence shows that on a matter which could hardly have been of more importance, mrjohnson are deliberately misled the house, notjust are deliberately misled the house, not just once, are deliberately misled the house, notjust once, but on numerous occasions. th

i referred to tweets that harriet harman published.— referred to tweets that harriet harman publishedshe could say something _ harman published. i wonder if she could say something of _ harman published. i wonder if she could say something of her - harman published. i wonder if she could say something of her own i could say something of her own position in relation to the president said by thejudiciary committee by the house of lords, when lord hoffmann was involved he was set aside not because he was biased but because of the perception of bias. in relation to herfamous tweets, how does she think she met the hoffman test? i’m tweets, how does she think she met the hoffman test?— the hoffman test? i'm happy to answer the _ the hoffman test? i'm happy to answer the point _ the hoffman test? i'm happy to answer the point that's - the hoffman test? i'm happy to answer the point that's made. i j the hoffman test? i'm happy to - answer the point that's made. i was appointed _ answer the point that's made. i was appointed by this house in the expectation that i would chair the committee, wi

harman will be putting a basic of the committee's position. going to respond to anything as a tax bori5john5on ha5 anything as a tax bori5john5on has made on her, accu5ing her of bias because she tweeted thing5 ahead of taking up this chairmanship about him and about his conduct in parliament, we don't know whether she will address those orju5t 5tick she will address those orju5t stick to the reports, but put the concerns here have been that certainly they have felt i had been threats made around the committee and lobbying for the committee that wouldn't nece55arily happen if there was a different parliamentary proce55 nece55arily happen if there was a different parliamentary process and there's likely to be another report coming out 5pecifically there's likely to be another report coming out specifically to address that. to white or going get a glass of water, at you'll we did a lot of talking today! that'5 of water, at you'll we did a lot of talking today! that's it of water, at you'll we did a lot of talking today! that'- of water, at you'l

harman had already made ner-nrs in— harriet harman had already made ner-nrs in e— harriet harman had. — wrong. and then then he lied about it. no,— wrong. and then then he lied about it . no, they- wrong. and then then he lied about it. \r:::r about it. no, they were investigating completely different things. the police didn't that boris didn't conclude that boris johnson didn't do anything wrong. that he broke wrong. they found that he broke the occasion, and the the law on one occasion, and the committee's investigated committee's been investigated something which something else entirely, which is not he misled is whether or not he misled parliament. the doesn't parliament. the police doesn't investigate or not mps investigate whether or not mps mislead parliament. they've never that . so never investigated that. so they're looking at very different things . and that's they're looking at very diffeiyou things . and that's they're looking at very diffeiyou know, . and that's they're looking at very diffeiyou know, theid that's they're looking at very diffeiyou know, the police�*s wh

if harriet harman, does matter, harman, it does matter, because if harman, it does matter, because ih-ehe then you turned up. do you think iweuhe giwe eeu— then you turned up. do you think i would give you a— then you turned up. do you think i would give you a fair interview? - i would give you a fair interview? i- i would give you a fair interview? i would give you a fair- interview? i think we could still have a conversation. yeah. okay. i think. look people can have views, but the have their views, but the question is, when you come into the when come the courtroom, when you come into quasi judicial body, into that quasi judicial body, are those people able to conduct themselves in an appropriate way? i happen to judge whether people are conservative or labour or liberal democrats that they do. and by and large, my view, after spending 18 years in the house of commons is that most people there are very good people. it's not about them being tories or labour or whatever might be. whatever else they might be. they're people who they're good, decent people who want parliament to respected

he accuses harriet harman the chairman of that committee, for forcing harriet harman the chairman oft of a political motivation. it is they have no shred of evidence that he knowingly or recklessly misled the commons. he is still maintaining that he did not lie, this big statement, announcing his resignation because i think this is hugely explosive. the key question now, is what happens next in terms of his allies? what ripple effects, if you like, will this have across the conservative party? we know that nadine dorries, one of his staunchest allies, has resigned earlier, it is still not clear exactly under what circumstances, whether it had to do with her proposal to be —— his proposal to be in the house of lords. there will be one by—election bear in her seat to come in bedfordshire. there will be another by—election for rishi sunak to contend with in it boris johnson's uxbridge seat in the north—west of london. clearly, something that will be problematic for a party that is struggling in the polls, but i think the interesting thing will be come over the course of the next few hou

harman was a neutral orttter 1n— harriet harman was a neutral arbiter in all— harriet harman was a neutralr viewers don't have read the whole have time to read the whole thing, just read about. the eight paragraphs from 109 onwards and they'll see what i mean, do what journalists do. just read the conclusion . well, just read the conclusion. well, it's just read the conclusion. well, 1t-s not— just read the conclusion. well, no not tte— just read the conclusion. well, it's not the conclusion because in the conclusion they say, look at paragraph that at paragraph this for that paragraph. it's a very, paragraph. it's a it's a very, very argued report. so very carefully argued report. so in a way, that means almost this is slightly contradictory because i remember having conversations with you about the process that paterson faced process that owen paterson faced , criticisms, , and there's been criticisms, david warburton today david warburton said today that standards kafka esque standards process is kafka esque and you concerned about it and you were concerned about it . so mps investigati

harriet harman's committee has set out to make that objective completely untenable.ivileges committee is there to protect the privileges of parliament, there is a very importantjob, they should not be using their powers which have only been a very recently designed, to mount what is plainly a political hitjob on someone they oppose. it is in no one because my interest however, that the process the committee has lodged for a single day further, so today i've written for my association in uxbridge and south rice lake, his constituency, to say i'm stepping down forthwith, triggering an immediate by—election. —— south rice lake. it has been a huge privilege to serve them as mp and mayor. it has been a 15 year stint, the elizabeth line, i have been able to deliver the funding for the state of the art hospital in hillingdon where the works have really begun. i also remain hugely proud of all that we achieved in my time as prime minister, getting brexits done, winning the biggest majority for a0 years and full delivering the fastest vaccine roll—out of any european country,

harman, to tweet the defendant is tuil . ., ~ harman, to tweet the defendant is tuil . . , harman, tory _ guilty. thank you very much indeed. thank you very much. _ a newsnight investigation into illegal money lending has conducted rare interviews with two loan sharks who say that business has never been so good, and that it's partly to do with the cost—of—living crisis. a new report commisiioned by fair4all finance — a government—backed body that works on finanical inclusion — heard from users of money lenders who are borrowing £3,000, on average, and they are more likely to be lower—waged, full—time earners. the money lenders, who say they are providing a service likened to a bank, can sometimes use violence which results in hospitalisation, and intimidation. here's laura jones. open the door! if you're going to delay us, we're going to break the l door, it's up to you. we'll explain what's going on as soon as we come in. we need you to open the door now, or we're going to have to force entry. are you going to open the door? investigators from the england illegal money lending team

i harman and sue grey. questions to answer? ~ . harman and sue grey. questions to answer?d have another five years of this. this is just more and more corruption and fighting and chaos and it doesn't really matter who is leading the conservative party. that's what we get. what we are not getting is a focus on the cost of living crisis and a leader who is prepared to address that. they aren't talking about fixing the nhs, they aren't talking about fighting crime. these are the things that are important and as a member of the public watching this, they might think this is all very well, this soap opera, the roller—coaster, but what about me and my life? isn't politics about making the lives of people better, not looking after themselves or their future or blaming other people or filling their future or blaming other people orfilling up their future or blaming other people or filling up with self—pity. boris's problems he brought on himself. none of this matters. what matters is we have proper politics addressing the issues and thinking about the public. two by-elections to d

harriet harman trying ro ger ar— labour's harriet harman trying ro ger ar nn— labour's harriet harman. if is really interesting— so good riddance. boris. if is really interesting actually, rnar— really interesting actually, rnarwon— really interesting actually, that you mimicked holly wrnongnnw— that you mimicked holly willoughby at the start there, deanse— willoughby at the start there, because that _ willoughby at the start there, because that was false fake and rnkk— because that was false fake and rnkk or— because that was false fake and rnkk or notes— because that was false fake and full of holes . _ because that was false fake and full of holes . i— because that was false fake and full of holes . " : full of holes. i mean, the idea that boris johnson was partying in number ten, like there was a sort of a disco ball put up in the main room and he was dancing around with carrie going round a pole or something like that is just ludicrous. but the thing is, just ludicrous. but the thing is wne— just ludicrous. but the thing is youe gor— just ludicrous. but the thing is, you've got t

so and harriet harman , she was declared as part harman, she was declared as part of harman, she was liar . ttoht. aho— out to be a scoundrel and a liar . right. and the— out to be a scoundrel and a liar . right. and the families i am more interested— . right. and the families i am more interested in what the tomtttee— more interested in what the tomtttee ot— more interested in what the families of the— more interested in what the families of the bereaved who had to the— families of the bereaved who had to the o— families of the bereaved who had to live a certain— families of the bereaved who had to live a certain way . i believe to live a certain way. i believe it to live a certain way. i believe tt woe— to live a certain way. i believe tt eoeeew— to live a certain way. i believe it was necessary during lockdown . suzanne doesn't— it was necessary during lockdown . suzanne doesn't okay to get the— . suzanne doesn't okay to get thte couhtw— . suzanne doesn't okay to get this country through the covid chete— this country through the covid chete .— this country through the covid chete

harriet harman trying ro ger ar— labour's harriet harman trying ro ger ar nn— labour's harriet harmand riddance. boris. if is really interesting— so good riddance. boris. if is really interesting actually, rnar— really interesting actually, rnarvon— really interesting actually, that you mimicked holly wrnongnnv— that you mimicked holly willoughby at the start there, deanse— willoughby at the start there, because that _ willoughby at the start there, because that was false fake and rnkk— because that was false fake and rnkk or— because that was false fake and rnkk or notes— because that was false fake and full of holes . _ because that was false fake and full of holes . i— because that was false fake and full of holes . " : full of holes. i mean, the idea that boris johnson was partying in number ten, like there was a sort of a disco ball put up in the main room and he was dancing around with carrie going round a pole or something like that is just ludicrous. but the thing is, just ludicrous. but the thing is wove— just ludicrous. but the thing is vonve gor— just ludicrous. but the thi

you know, she was harman said?iet harman's seeunty— court puts harriet harman's seeunty at— court puts harriet harman's security at risk. - court puts harriet harman's security at risk. “tit“ security at risk. come on. i think nadine, come on. nadine said that they should get over the i mean , i've the hurty words. i mean, i've read some of the reports. absolutely pompous and arrogant . and as you say, a really bad day. dan for free speech. dreadful i mean, carl, this is stasttnu— dreadful i mean, carl, this is shocking, isn't— dreadful i mean, carl, this is shocking, isn't it?— t: i mean, carl, this is shocking, isn't it? what has nannenet— shocking, isn't it? what has nannenet ta— shocking, isn't it? what has happened to free speech at westminster— happened to free speech at westminster ? _ happened to free speech at westminster ? westminster? look, some people say that gb news is like walking into an alternate universe, and ihave into an alternate universe, and i have never felt that more than right now. i feel

you know, she was harman said?iet harman's seeunty— court puts harriet harman's seeunty at— court puts harriet harman's security at risk. - court puts harriet harman's security at risk. “tit“ security at risk. come on. i think nadine, come on. nadine said that they should get over the i mean , i've the hurty words. i mean, i've read some of the reports. absolutely pompous and arrogant . and as you say, a really bad day. dan for free speech. dreadful i mean, carl, this is stasttnu— dreadful i mean, carl, this is shocking, isn't— dreadful i mean, carl, this is shocking, isn't it?— t: i mean, carl, this is shocking, isn't it? what has nannenet— shocking, isn't it? what has nannenet ta— shocking, isn't it? what has happened to free speech at westminster— happened to free speech at westminster ? _ happened to free speech at westminster ? westminster? look, some people say that gb news is like walking into an alternate universe, and ihave into an alternate universe, and i have never felt that more than right now. i feel

not heard from but has played a key role in this is the chair of the privileges committee, harriet harman expected to give the response up until now the privileges committee have made the point that they have put forward their report, they want the report to do the talking but here we will hear from harriet harman, she will give her view, other mps will be giving their view and at some point perhaps there will be a vote as to whether that report should be approved by parliament. it is not expected it will not be approved but the question is whether there will need to be a vote because if nobody objects to the vote will go through. if nobody ob'ects to the vote will go through.— if nobody ob'ects to the vote will no throu:h.~ . ., ,., go through. what about the prime minister rishi _ go through. what about the prime minister rishi sunak? _ go through. what about the prime minister rishi sunak? is _ go through. what about the prime minister rishi sunak? is it - go through. what about the prime minister rishi sunak? is it clear. minister rishi sunak? is it clear whether he is going to vote,

we chew—ere. wel know harriet harman, did. we chew— know harriet harman, did. we know—members?now, we know harriet-tweeted . about boris. now, we know harriet tweeted his harriet harman tweeted his rrhhsrrw— harriet harman tweeted his ministry-truth- harriet harman tweeted his ministry truth stuff ministry of truth stuff now, hecaase— ministry of truth stuff now, because-tell- ministry of truth stuff now, because tell you , there because let me tell you, there ae-wahr— because let me tell you, there ae-wahr re- because let me tell you, there are -want to speak. because let me tell you, there are want to speak out are mps who want to speak out agahsr— are mps who want to speak out agahsr rhe— are mps who want to speak out against the privileges committee, - against the privileges committee, but are now too .p..pg_ committee, but are now too afraid re— committee, but are now too afraid he he— committee, but are now too afraid to do so— committee, but are now too afraid to do so because they'll be afraid to do so because they'll he saspeheee— afraid to do so because they'll be sus

we thew—th- wel know harriet harman, did. we thew— know harriet harman, did. we know—members?ted . about boris. now, we know harriet tweeted his harriet harman tweeted his hthtstry— harriet harman tweeted his ministry-truth- harriet harman tweeted his ministry truth now, ministry of truth stuff now, hese— ministry of truth stuff now, because-tell- ministry of truth stuff now, because tell you , there because let me tell you, there there-ht— because let me tell you, there there-ht te- because let me tell you, there are -want to speak. because let me tell you, there are want to speak out are mps who want to speak out eeehst— are mps who want to speak out eeehst the— are mps who want to speak out against the privileges committee, - against the privileges committee, but are now too strate— committee, but are now too etrett te— committee, but are now too etrett to te— committee, but are now too afraid to do so— committee, but are now too afraid to do so because they'll be afraid to do so because they'll he shshehtet— afraid to do so because they'll be suspended if— afraid to do so

— report starts with the chairman, harriet harman ,_ report starts with the chairman, harriet harmanrriet harman, because she expressed her— harriet harman, because she expressed her views on boris's trustworthiness— expressed her views on boris's trustworthiness before she remed— trustworthiness before she rerrree rhe— trustworthiness before she joined the committee on the hoffman— joined the committee on the hoffman principle. she ought to here— hoffman principle. she ought to here steed— hoffman principle. she ought to have stood aside— hoffman principle. she ought to have stood aside and the great leer,— have stood aside and the great ladyr lady— have stood aside and the great lady, lady thatcher, never lost an lady, lady thatcher, never lost err erection.— lady, lady thatcher, never lost an election. she— lady, lady thatcher, never lost an election. she was forced out by her— an election. she was forced out by her ew— an election. she was forced out by her berry— an election. she was forced out by her own party the same was true— by her own party the same was bee er— by her own

cheering _ the chair of the privileges committee, harriet harman there, saying that perception mattersdent. you've been watching the debate, what has particularly, or who has stood out to you? i think the first thing _ or who has stood out to you? i think the first thing that's _ or who has stood out to you? i think the first thing that's really _ or who has stood out to you? i think the first thing that's really stood - the first thing that's really stood out, and i'm revealing my age a bit, but having watched debate secure on and off for a0 years, rarely have i seen anything quite that passionate and impassioned. and i think that's understandable because it's about the rights of that building, it's about the place of parliament and britain's democracy. so you had mp after mp saying, "look, if we don't approve this report, we will be undermining the faith and parliament, we will not be making it clear there's one rule for the government and one rule for everyone else. and on that front, there is a really powerful intervention from theresa may, a conservative mp and of course former pr

what you will hear is the right honourable harriet harman, the right honourable harriet harman, the chairaction in person it to the report and we knew to be vitriolic report response from boris johnson when he released that resignation statement and accuse them of being a kangaroo court and said this was a witch hunt. there will be plenty to watch and plenty of interest. i havejust will be plenty to watch and plenty of interest. i have just spoken to a biographer of borisjohnson who know so well who believes that he will be at home watching the ongoing proceedings this afternoon along with a fair few other people, i should imagine. as i say, boris johnson's 59th birthday today. haifa johnson's 59th birthday today. now time for the — johnson's 59th birthday today. now time for the weather. not quite as warm out there is the start of last week but this week will still bring the spells of warm sunshine, temperature still above the average for the time of year. with that, a scattering of heavy downpours another satellite picture, a lot of cloud pushed its way northwards yesterday, last night,

the american finished on 23 under overall — three clear of compatriots zac blair and brian harman.oy finished in a share of seventh place. bradley overcame a back—nine wobble to follow up his success at the zozo championship eight months ago. this is for all of the kids who grow up this is for all of the kids who grow up in a news england, had to sit through the winter and watch other people play golf and i'm just so proud to win this tournament, and everyone involved, to put on a first—class tournament. it has been like this for a decade and are just so proud to win now. it's finely poised between england and australia, in women's ashes test at trent bridge australia need just 4 wickets. they're underway on the fifth and final day after england resumed on 116—5. they're chasing 268 to win, which would be the highest chase in women's test history. ash gardner with three wickets so far west indies are taking on the netherlands, as part of the ongoing qualification for this years men's cricket world cup. they're currently 256 — 3 in the one—day match in harare having lost to zimbabwe

,-made- later today, chaired by harriet harman, made her mind up harman, who made her mind up xone— harmanthe but we'll bring that to the law, but we'll bring that to you.— the law, but we'll bring that to yon-nons— the law, but we'll bring that to yon-norxs .— the law, but we'll bring that to yon-norxs . ox— the law, but we'll bring that to you. boris , of course, the you. and boris, of course, the vrxx— you. and boris, of course, the vrxx vxxx— you. and boris, of course, the writ will-moved- you. and boris, of course, the writ will moved today him you. and boris, of course, the wr stand moved today him you. and boris, of course, the wr stand down oved today him you. and boris, of course, the wrstand down as d today him you. and boris, of course, the wrstand down as an oday him you. and boris, of course, the wrstand down as an mp. him you. and boris, of course, the wrstand down as an mp. i'll him to stand down as an mp. i'll xss— to stand down as an mp. i'll nxn.— to stand down as an mp. i'll nxn. x— to stand down as an mp. i'll miss him. i don't- to stand down as an mp. i'll miss him. i

harriet harman, theresa may tottttoo— harriet harman, theresa may tottttoo tn— harriet harman, theresah there, diva ish otett— of diva ish there, diva ish stuff there _ of diva ish there, diva ish stuff there that you had to be at stuff there that you had to be et e— stuff there that you had to be et e oenetn— stuff there that you had to be at a certain level— stuff there that you had to be at a certain level to be in her presence. otherwise an intimate nettery— presence. otherwise an intimate nettery woett— presence. otherwise an intimate mediary would do— presence. otherwise an intimate mediary would do the for job ner- — mediary would do the for job ner- ant— mediary would do the for job her. and then— mediary would do the for job her. and then she, as you say, etttet— her. and then she, as you say, was edited in.— her. and then she, as you say, was edited in. you— her. and then she, as you say, was edited in. you wouldn't teeeoe— was edited in. you wouldn't tettewe tt— was edited in. you wouldn't tettewe tt .— was edited in. you wouldn't believe it . and— was edited in. you wouldn'

then you have harriet harman, who is a divisive figure ana— harman, who is a divisive figure and ban—ry majority. cnarbes— an inbuilt tory majority. charles walker is an obsessive narer— charles walker is an obsessive narer er— charles walker is an obsessive hater of boris— charles walker is an obsessive hater of boris .— charles walker is an obsessive hater of boris . andy carter hater of boris. andy carter rue-we— hater of boris. andy carter rue-we ger— hater of boris. andy carter we've got documents where he sabe— we've got documents where he saw bans— we've got documents where he said boris had— we've got documents where he said boris had to— we've got documents where he said boris had to go in 2020 to anar— said boris had to go in 2020 to that committee,— said boris had to go in 2020 to that committee, had an inbuilt anrr—bens— that committee, had an inbuilt anti—boris majority . 1g“ anti—boris majority. right. so it wag-m— anti—boris majority. right. so it was-nr a— anti—boris majority. right. so it wasn't a an anti tory majority . it certainly wasn't. majority. it certainly was

king is harman. x is a song? yes it is very good morning everyone. i served with some of you as we all did over the years. there i member your father so fondly please say hello. i served all of these people it is enormously exciting to have a reunion of people dedicated to the intelligence enterprise. i was thinking on 911 just before became ranking member i was walking toward the dome of the capitol at 9:00 a.m. at your mind that is really intelligence committee rooms were from the dome of the capitol. everyone thanks that was the intended target of the fourth plane went down in pennsylvania. they were aiming at us. they're obviously aiming at our government and could have maybe caused a continuity of government crisis. because congress have a thoughtful plant of what to do the capitol were attacked. but it has been a long road from then until now. the one thing that is not changed at all, it did change for a while. the one thing that some back the bipartisan character of this committee i just want to commend all of you for helping hands. i gather y

skewed harman and supplied with skewed teteh— harman and supplied with skewed heteh-whth— harman and we are hearing johnson are hearing from boris johnson is are hearing from boris johnson he-teteet— are hearing from boris johnson is-reject these- is he will reject these thmthmte— is he will reject these findings, but it has to be put eet— findings, but it has to be put eet-the— findings, but it has to be put out-the people— findings, but it has to be put out the people who've been out to the people who've been eheetet — out to the people who've been eheetet ty— out to the people who've been eheetet ty ty— out to the people who've been elected by by all— out to the people who've been elected by by all of us. it teee. — elected by by all of us. it does. .this_ elected by by all of us. it does. elected by by all of us. it- does. .this committee, the does. so this committee, the committee is putting forward a recommendation. the house will vote learn at 1030 vote on it. we learn at 1030 this morning when house this morning when the house votes and how they will votes on this and how the

harriet harman declared her position before the report began. senior member on the committee actually had a party himself. we have not heard about those allegations from him himself, but she goes on to say, any conservative mp who should vote for this report is fundamentally not a conservative and will be held to account by members and the public. she adds, deselection may follow. it is serious. mps will now have to show the committee what we are just as look like, and how it is done, because of course, what happens now is mps get to vote on the recommendations from the report. if you are just recommendations from the report. if you arejustjoining us, the recommendation from the committee is that boris johnson recommendation from the committee is that borisjohnson should be suspended for 90 days, he of course has already resigned as an mp, but if he was, that would be the sanction they are recommending. that now goes to a committee of the whole house, the house of commons will vote on this. they will do that on monday. it is going to be a free v

harriet harman was given, as sswwh— harriet harman was given, as show pictures— harriet harman was givenllions. he will. he will. he. will—going to make will come. he's going to make mhhohs— will come. he's going to make millions-about- will come. he's going to make millions-about his- millions writing about his ooopohoho— millions writing about his experience kangaroo experience and the kangaroo cowh— experience and the kangaroo sows—hoen- experience and the kangarool court—been held court that he's just been held up h.— court that he's just been held up h. — court that he's just been held up w aho— court that he's just been held up w who if— court that he's just been held up in. and if liz— court that he's just been held up in. ': �*" court that he's just been held up in. ' z �*" to?" court that he's just been held up in. and if liz truss can make a you know, you know, a fortune, you know, you know, he'll wares. he'll be selling her wares. what do liz truss don't you do you mean? liz truss don't you moon-wow— do you mean? liz truss don't you moon-wow whh— do you mean? liz truss don't y

he says the mayor made the right call to remove harman forte. she was part of the problem where they seem to fight all the time. you can disagree without being disagreeable. he says he believes the commission can now focus on finding a new top cop after the mayor fired chief loren armstrong. i think that this will not hurt the process and it will very likely help it. the former judge has filed an ethics complaint against council member kevin jenkins, whom she accused of abusing his power in his dealings with mulally. it's not about the personalities. it's about improving public safety here in oakland. and the infighting is definitely troubling because we have one goal make oakland a safer place for residents. kathy leonard is president of the coalition for police accountability, which helped create the commission. i commend the mayor of taking the courageous step. we are hopeful that that the police commission will get on board with doing the work that they were, that they volunteered to do. now, the commission has hired a search firm to help fi

harman fought accuses the group of trying to bully and retaliate against them. a search and rescue operation is underway to try and find a tourist submersible in a remote area of the north atlantic after it went missing while on an excursion to explore the wreckage of the titanic. that submersible disappeared in the open ocean about an hour and 45 minutes after leaving its launch ship on sunday morning. on board a pilot for passengers, two, including a british businessman and explorer , as well as members of a prominent pakistani business family. the us coast guard is coordinating the search effort. they gave an update just a couple of hours ago, saying that so far they haven't found any signs of that submersible. this is a complex search and it's complex for a variety of reasons . we're you know, you're talking about a search area that's 900 miles east of cape cod, 400 miles south of saint john's. so logistics speaking. it's hard to bring assets to bear. it takes time. it takes coordination. the submersible had 96 hours of oxygen on board the coast guard says b

miss harman? >> thank you, mister chairman.ain, thank you all for your service and at every critical time. let's remember that fisa stands for the foreign intelligence surveillance act. foreign intelligence, focused on non u.s. persons, but designed to prevent of these of u.s. persons and obviously, to find out what the threats to our country are. and when we amended fisa after discovering it, as i said, the bush 43 administration was not following it, we did our best to target non-u.s. persons outside the u.s., to come up with a strategy that would get information, including information ultimately from the u.s. persons if they were in the chain from foreign intelligence targets. and we did okay. we did pass these amendments on a bipartisan basis, but we have them sunset every five years, that's what we are talking about. the end of this year is the second or third sunset of our effort to amend fisa. you are right, it still leads work. i would make two points. number one, how important it is to have our activities in this area

— harriet harman to ask her for her or— harriet harman to ask her for her view on these _ harriet harmanernard. so who better to have with me to discuss this wron— have with me to discuss this rrrorr wre— have with me to discuss this than the founder— have with me to discuss this than the founder of guido roves,— than the founder of guido rowvee, wr— than the founder of guido fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, wre— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, were re— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, were to quite— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, were to we o— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, this is quite a story. can it reouy— this is quite a story. can it reouy oe— this is quite a story. can it really be true?— this is quite a story. can it really be true? are you certain , eerrorr— really be true? are you certain , eerrorr reor— really be true? are you certain , certain that sir— really be true? are you certain , certain that sir bernard rewro— , certain that sir bernard rerwr woe— , certain that sir bernard jenkin was, in- , certain that sir bernard jenkin was, in fact at a party were— jenkin was, in fact

harriet harman to ask her for ner on— harriet harman to ask her for her view on these _ harriet harmanave with me to discuss this than the founder— have with me to discuss this than the founder of guido tonnes,— than the founder of guido tonnes, irr— than the founder of guido fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, the— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, rnre re— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, tie re quire— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, the re quire o— fawkes, mr paul staines? paul, this is quite a story. can it reouy— this is quite a story. can it reouy ne— this is quite a story. can it really be true?— this is quite a story. can it really be true? are you certain , eenorn— really be true? are you certain , eenorn rnor— really be true? are you certain , certain that sir— really be true? are you certain , certain that sir bernard jenkin— , certain that sir bernard rennin woe— , certain that sir bernard jenkin was, in- , certain that sir bernard jenkin was, in fact at a party nrrn— jenkin was, in fact at a party nrrn trinke— jenkin was, in fact at a party with drinks during a period of roekoonn— wi

,— up from the beginning because harriet harman, the chairman , harriet harman, the chairman, treaty— to happen, and he has tater the— was going to happen, and he has taken the horns— was going to happen, and he has taken the horns ,_ was going to happen, and he has taken the horns , holding the taken the horns, holding the horre— taken the horns, holding the harre ara— taken the horns, holding the horns and the— taken the horns, holding the horns and the bull by the horns heeavee— horns and the bull by the horns heave ht— horns and the bull by the horns because it absolutely determined that he— because it absolutely determined that he he— because it absolutely determined that he he garg— because it absolutely determined that he is going to— because it absolutely determined that he is going to come out of the— that he is going to come out of the ar— that he is going to come out of the ar the— that he is going to come out of this on the front— that he is going to come out of this on the front foot. my guess is this on the front foot. my guess he that— this on the front foot. my guess h

, i don't know— harman in speaking say, i don't know ii— harman in speaking say, i don't know ii vow— vesieneev— agitated in the comments yesterday about the fact boris nei— yesterday about the fact boris neo—io- yesterday about the fact boris had—to criticise. had the temerity to criticise ine— had the temerity to criticise ine wonkings— had the temerity to criticise the workings of— had the temerity to criticise the workings of the committee , the workings of the committee, wnicn— the workings of the committee, wnicn ne — the workings of the committee, which he called— the workings of the committee, which he called a— the workings of the committee, which he called a kangaroo court iecese— which he called a kangaroo court iecese ii— which he called a kangaroo court because it-its_ which he called a kangaroo court because it-its-up.- which he called a kangaroo court because it its up. and because it made its mind up. and in-ii— because it made its mind up. and in-ii vow— because it made its mind up. and in-ii vow kook— because it made its mind up. and in-if you look at— because it mad

it harriet harman, mentioning rishi sunak? . ~ . sunak?eacher, it must have been so _ again. thank you. primary teacher, it must have been so hard - again. thank you. primary teacher, it must have been so hard for - again. thank you. primary teacher, it must have been so hard for you | it must have been so hard for you during that period. i know it was. colin and jen. hello, both. colin, off you go. colin and jen. hello, both. colin, off you go— colin and jen. hello, both. colin, off ou o. , ., ., off you go. the reason i phoned and was i listened _ off you go. the reason i phoned and was i listened to _ off you go. the reason i phoned and was i listened to his _ off you go. the reason i phoned and was i listened to his defence. - was i listened to his defence. anyone — was i listened to his defence. anyone else who wants to phone in... sorry, you listen to his defence. he sent a sorry, you listen to his defence. he spent a quarter of £1 million on akc to come _ spent a quarter of £1 million on akc to come up— spent a quarter of £1 million

harriet harman the chair of that committee will give a staunch defence of the report's findings thats. however, he has already called to the conclusions of that report deranged so you can expect some of his supporters to stand up tomorrow and get stuck in. what is not clear to note is that once mps have aired their views, will they then simply push the report through or will there be a recorded vote? some conservatives do want their votes recorded, even though that will make life more difficult for the current occupant of number 10. because if rishi sunak votes with the report, he will upset pro—johnson activist. if he votes against, the opposition will say he lacks integrity. if he doesn't turn up to vote at all, he is hosting a foreign leader in downing street tomorrow, he will be denounced as weak. so although boris johnson is no longer an mp, he will probably hang a bit like a gloomy thundercloud over rishi sunak tomorrow and potentially over the four by—elections which the conservatives are now facing. thank you for now, iain watson. later this week, the bank of england is likel

harman, ford says that group is trying to bully and retaliate against the. well, next week, california reparations task force is about to submit an historic report. the panel is expected to formally present to state lawmakers recommendations for compensating black californians for the harms of slavery and other injustices. uc berkeley professor jovan scott lewis sits on that task force and says many of california's black homeowners were not getting fair payments for homes of were seized through eminent domain back in the 1960s and 70s, when you try to build a highway system, you have to demolish neighborhoods and homes in order to build those highways. and what we found is that the majority of those homes were in african american communities. now, the task force is expected to recommend that black californians be paid up to $1.2 million. the critics say that plan could cost the state $800 million. climate change is factoring into many adults decisions, including whether to have more kids. according to an international research firm. more than half of parents

bewildered and appalled that i could be forced out anti-democratically by a committee chaired by harriet harmanuch egregious bias. thank you for allowing me to finish the statement. it was very long and full of fury and venom from their former prime minister boris johnson. let's bring back in jo-anne nadler. give us your reaction to some of the scathing comments he has made. jo-anne: well, despite the fact that i was somewhat critical in our opening comments of boris johnson, i also have quite a lot of sympathy with some of the points that he has raised in this second part of the statement that you have just read. and i do think that there is a real issue about natural justice and the way that this committee has conducted itself and the nature of the inquiry, because after all, boris johnson suffered quite considerable repercussions from the initial moves made against him in parliamentary terms as a result of the fallout from partygate. he resigned as prime minister. so it did feel like there was something beyond the normal process going on here, and it was something slightly punitive about the

i'm with harriet harman.ing about it, which is costing this gowommott— about it, which is costing this government and— about it, which is costing this government and us every day . government and us every day. ootot— government and us every day. ootot .— government and us every day. qatar . mentally— government and us every day. qatar . mentally hang- government and us every day. qatar. mentally hang on,- government and us every day. qatar. mentally hang on, please hold on one second. two seconds. let hold on one second. two seconds. tot tot— hold on one second. two seconds. tot to respond-— hold on one second. two seconds. let her respond. okay. - hold on one second. two seconds. let her respond. okay. if- tit“ two seconds. let her respond. okay. �*7 e�*c let her respond. okay. if we had a let her respond. okay. if we had o otooom— let her respond. okay. if we had a decent immigration system, we would not be spending £6 million a day doing hotels. these people should be processed. we should find out who are

harriet harman is the labour mp who chaired this investigation. she was prejudiced against him from the outset given things she had previously said. the report says its members were informed by the facts. jacob rees—mogg was knighted by borisjohnson and served in his cabinet. what did he make of the report? well, i think it's over—baked. i think they want to find the worst at every possible opportunity, and i think it shows a degree of vindictiveness that does not work to the committee's favour or advantage. is this the end for borisjohnson? no way back from this, is there? there's easily a way back. because the great virtue of our system is that parliament can chuck you out, it can chuck you out again and suspend you, but if voters send you back, back you come. today's report came out at 9am, but the prime minister managed to find himself in front of the cameras earlier than that, wanting to look like he's getting on with the job on an immigration raid in west london. you're talking about a report that i haven't seen and no—one else has seen. it

,— up from the beginning because harriet harman, the chairman , harriet harman, the chairman, eteoriypen, and he has taken the horns— was going to happen, and he has taken the horns ,_ was going to happen, and he has taken the horns , holding the taken the horns, holding the norms— taken the horns, holding the norms ont— taken the horns, holding the horns and the— taken the horns, holding the horns and the bull by the horns tease— horns and the bull by the horns teeouse it— horns and the bull by the horns because it absolutely determined that because it absolutely determined tnot ne— because it absolutely determined tnot ne is— because it absolutely determined tnot ne is going— because it absolutely determined that he is going to— because it absolutely determined that he is going to come out of ms— that he is going to come out of tnis on— that he is going to come out of tnis on me— that he is going to come out of this on the front— that he is going to come out of this on the front foot. my guess is tnot— this on the front foot. my guess is tnot ne— this on the front foot. my guess is

committee's chairwoman, harriet harman, of agrarius bias . ii-s— harriet harman, of agrarius bias .ridge and south ruislip constituency, _ uxbridge and south ruislip constituency, where the conservatives - constituency, where the conservatives have a of a small mar-onw— conservatives have a of a small maieriw ef— conservatives have a of a small maieriw an insi— conservatives have a of a small majority of just over 7000. joining— majority of just over 7000. reining me— majority of just over 7000. joining me now— majority of just over 7000. joining me now to discuss this or neiiiicai— joining me now to discuss this or political gb— joining me now to discuss this or political gb news political renerier— or political gb news political reporter catherine forster, who is in— reporter catherine forster, who is in saris— reporter catherine forster, who is in boris johnson , soon to be is in boris johnson, soon to be ex censiiiaencw— is in boris johnson, soon to be ex constituency of— is in boris johnson, soon to be ex constituency of uxbridge and win— ex constituency of uxbridge and wiii ne

the labour chair of the committee, harriet harman, is expected to give a staunch defence of her reportconservative majority, came under unfair pressure from johnson supporters. it's not clear, having aired their views, whether mps will simply nod the report through or whether there will be a recorded vote. if so, that could be tricky for rishi sunak. if he votes for the report, he will upset the pro—johnson activists. if he votes against, the opposition will say he lacks integrity. if he doesn't turn up to vote at all, they will accuse him of being weak. with four by—elections looming, rishi sunak is keen to move on from partygate, but this video shows just how difficult that will be. this is conservative party headquarters in december 2020, when socialising between different households was banned. the attendees were working on the london mayoral campaign and not for borisjohnson, but the danger for rishi sunak is that events like these tarnish his party's brand, and the political damage goes beyond the reputation of a previous prime minister. let's get some of the day's other news now

miss miss harman, how do you— miss. miss miss harman, how do you geeee— miss.e of the concern there is about either— some of the concern there is about either mr— some of the concern there is about either mr sunaks ability to about either mr sunaks ability ho vh— about either mr sunaks ability ho vh hhe— about either mr sunaks ability to win the next— about either mr sunaks ability to win the next election or vhehher— to win the next election or vhehher or— to win the next election or whether or not— to win the next election or whether or not he's now too vhhhhg — whether or not he's now too vhhhhg ho — whether or not he's now too willing to compromise on what regard— willing to compromise on what regoro oe— willing to compromise on what some regard as the essential prhehghee— some regard as the essential grhhehghee or— some regard as the essential principles of brexit, and that mr rohheoh— principles of brexit, and that mr johnson is— principles of brexit, and that mr johnson is a— principles of brexit, and that mr johnson is a result is going mrjohnson is a r

harriet harman is the labour mp who chaired this investigation. said. the report says its members were informed by the facts. jacob rees—mogg was knighted by borisjohnson and served in his cabinet. what did he make of the report? well, i think it's over—baked. i think they want to find the worst at every possible opportunity, and i think it shows a degree of vindictiveness that does not work to the committee's favour or advantage. is this the end for borisjohnson? no way back from this, is there? there's easily a way back, because the great virtue of our system is that parliament can chuck you out, it can chuck you out again and it can suspend you, but if voters send you back, back you come. today's report came out at 9am, but the prime minister managed to find himself in front of the cameras earlier than that... ..wanting to look like he's getting on with the job on an immigration raid in west london. you're talking about a report that i haven't seen and no—one else has seen. it wouldn't be right to comment on it in advance of it coming out and b