i would say harry reid opened the door by lowering the bar for federal judges to assemble. party, so he was justified in doing the same for the supreme court. that's what he would say. is there a response to that? yeah, i think there is a response to that and by the way one of the one of the charms of senator mcconnell is he not only has his victories, but he then rewrites the history. he has very recently said and he said many times the left is response to democrats are responsible for every escalation of the judicial wars. now that's simply not true. the confirmation of supreme court justices was proceeding sort of relatively normally for a long time. until his unprecedented action to prevent the nomination and consideration of merrick garland. he won that one. when he came up a winner when trump came in. everything else from that including and that was an unprecedented act. utterly unprecedented and the ramming through of amy coney barrett. which i called the banana republic confirmation eight days before the election. was i think the most anti-democratic act i've ever s

. >> harry reid opened the barn door in november 2013.pproving many of president obama's lower court nominees, lower administration nominees. what he did is put into effect the nuclear option. this is where you back the senate into a parliament tree cul-de-sac, they have unlimited debate, this was not debatable and with some very fancy parliamentary footwork if you have a simple majority, you can change not the rules of the senate but the precedent and the ruling by department aryans that it takes 60 votes to end of filibuster on judicial nominations and executive branch nominations. the democratic chair overruled the parliamentarian and you can do that with a 51 majority. 51 vote majority. they establish to the nuclear option lowering the fill buster bar from 60 to 51 yeas for all types of nominations except the supreme court. let's go to 2017. this empty supreme court seat left over that president obama nominated merrick garland for in 2016 and no supreme court nominee ever faced a filibuster. you had a fordyce, chief justice and 60 yay

i heard harry reid say the most remarkable thing is they followed it. noww they didn't have guns or riots or stonethrowing. and stanford students i was talking to said at least 20% and maybe 30%ay are thinking too bad there were not a few riots, too bad there were not a few stones. before you come to that conclusion, i would like you to look on television and elsewhere at what happens in places and times and countries where they decide the differences that way because really the rule of law is not an absolute and it is only one small part of the country's values in the document, the constitution. but it is an important part. that's all i want them to do. it is aha comparison. and i believe though i am biased because i am a judge so i don't think so, it is important for us to maintain that respect for the rule of law ever since andrew jackson refused to carry out john marshall's opinion saying northern georgia belonged to cherokee and send troops to evict the cherokees. but we have made progress in that respect and how to continue to make that progress a

in terms of the cloture vote, the democrats and harry reid, it was used as a tool just like mitch mcconnell, i think the american people are fed up. how can a democratic republic exist if there is not a vote taken on the issue. if you ever see a vote taken you think that your government and the system is broken. over 400 bills, 70% of them bipartisan are sitting there now. and yes, you are correct. that happened when democrats were able to use cloture to vote . that is probably the biggest threat to our democracy and the wing that needs to change so that people can hold their elected representatives accountable as you suggest you wanted to do in the case of talking about the definition of assault weapons. host: this is bill, and independent. caller: good morning. i used to be a journalist in washington dc. during the obama and biden administration, homeland security were tracking extremist. that office was disbanded. i am just wondering if our government has any tracking group tracking far left and right groups? there was a collar from the louisiana who said watch out democrats in a menacin

but i heard harry reid say the most remarkable thing is theyfollowed it .idn't have guns or riots or stone throwing. and the stanford students i was talking to i said i know when i say that at least 20 percent, maybe 30 percent are thinking well, too bad there were a few stones thrown and so forth. i said before you come to that conclusion i would like you to look on television or elsewhere at what happens in places and times and countries where they decide their differences that way. because the rule of law is not an absolute and it's only one small part of this country's values embedded in this doctrine of the constitution. but it is an important part. and that's what i want you to do. is draw comparisons and i believe though i'm biased because i'm a judge perhaps i'm biased, i don't think so. i believe it is important to maintain that respect for the rule of law that ever since andrew jackson refused to carry out john marshall's opinion saying northern georgia belonged to turkey instead sent troops to index turkey but we've made progress in that respect

all presidential nominees were subject to that standard up until november of 2013 when harry reid and theha democratic majority at the time came to the senate. they nuke the filibuster inat tt area.. although he blamed the desire to not have that spread elsewhere everyone understood at the time once you nuke the filibuster as to presidential nominees there's no principled distinction between differentiating people to the suprememi court or other nominees. that changed. the kind of change that doesn't getes undone or get ignored. as for not holding a vote on merrick garland the senate job is to review and decide whether to confirm. we decided not to confirm your ireland and whether we do so by a vote or whether we do so by declining to schedule a vote. the decision was made by the republican leadership at the time which was to not put them through the laborious and exercise of hearings and votes when we knew we weren't owing to confirm him. understand and respect your viewpoint. i do disagree.

harry reid believed they were going to have a democratic president's forever.e took the rules of the senate change them in the simple majority rules led to trump getting great three great conservatives on the corporate one thing we are not talking about is justice ginsburg who is a mighty voice sheet shows not to retire. it was amazing series of events that allowed us to get here today. at the state level to my friends on the left you are going to have a hell of a fight on your hands at the state level at the ballot box. that is where this should've been all along. >> are going to see a lot of attention paid to state legislature places where people may not of paid attention. your colleagues in the senate, joe manchin is a pro-life catholic is calling for legislation to codify it roe v wade. makowski calls in the same bernie sanders said we got to end the filibuster and codify as a law roe and casey what you say to them? >> i don't think joe manchin is going to turn the senate into the house. he may be disappointed in this decision. if you are pro-life you shoul

they were all subject to that standard up until november of 2013 when harry reid, i was in the senatehen it happened. they removed the filibuster. everyone understood at the time that once you knew the filibuster as to presidential nominees there was no principled distinction between supreme court and other nominees. that is the kind of change that does not get undone. it does not get ignored. as for not holding a vote on merrick garland. the senate's job is to review and to decide whether to confirm. we decided not to confirm eric garland. it was a mentor you to me whether we do so by a vote or whether we decided to not schedule a vote. we opted for the latter strategy. we knew we were not going to confirm him. i understand you disagree but i do disagree. host: do you think we are going to see confirmation votes where a justice get 60 or more votes again. all the eventual justices received less than 55 votes? guest: the short answer is no, not in the foreseeable future. i described in chapter one of saving nine, we shouldn't view the supreme court as a a political body. it has taken

votes and all presidential nominees were subject to that standard up until november of 2013 when harry reid and the democratic majority at the time, i was in the senate at the time that happened. they nuked the filibuster in that area. although he claimed the desire to not have that to spread spred elsewhere everyone understood at the time that once you nuke the filibuster as to presidential nominees, there is no principled distinction for differentiating between supreme court and other nominees. so that's changed. that's the kind of change that doesn't just get undone or ignored. for not holding a vote on merrick garland, the senate's job is to review and decide whetherr to confirm. we decided not to confirm. it seems immaterial to me whether we do so by a vote or whether we do so by declining to schedule a vote. at that decision was made by the senate republican leadership at the time to be for the latter strategy which wasn't to put them through the laborious and pointless exercise. do you think we are going to see confirmation both where the justice gets 60 or more votes, the four that

they were all subject to that standard up until november of 2013 when harry reid, i was in the senate when it happened. they removed the filibuster. everyone understood at the time that once you knew the filibuster as to presidential nominees there was no principled distinction between supreme court and other nominees. that is the kind of change that does not get undone. it does not get ignored. as for not holding a vote on merrick garland. the senate's job is to review and to decide whether to confirm. we decided not to confirm eric garland. it was a mentor you to me whether we do so by a vote or whether we decided to not schedule a vote. we opted for the latter strategy. we knew we were not going to confirm him. i understand you disagree but i do disagree. host: do you think we are going to see confirmation votes where a justice get 60 or more votes again. all the eventual justices received less than 55 votes? guest: the short answer is no, not in the foreseeable future. i described in chapter one of saving nine, we shouldn't view the supreme court as a a political body. it has take

okay but i heard harry reid say the most remarkable thing is they followed it. now, they didn't. they didn't have guns or riots or throwing. the stanford student i was talking to is that i know when i say that at least 20% or 30% nursing too bad there weren't a few stones thrown and so forth. before you come to that conclusion, i would like you to look on television and elsewhere at what happens in places, and times, in countries where they decide differences that way. because the rule of law is not an absolute, it is only one small part of this country's values embedded in the constitution. but it is an important part. that is what it want them to do it's called comparison and i believe unbiased because i am a judge perhaps i am biased, i don't think so. i believe it is important for us to maintain that respect for a rule of law that ever since andrew jackson refused to carry out jon marshall's opinion saying northern georgia belongs to the cherokees but instead sent troops to evict the cherokees that we have made progress in that respect. and how to continue to make that progre

in 2013, harry reid broke senate rules to set the threshold for confirmation at 51. i said at the time you may be sorry you did this. neither of those moves played out as his colleagues intended. neither did the disgraceful firestorm that was visited upon justice thomas and ginni back in 1991. i am not going to dwell on that episode tonight. there is no reason to. we all know what the people behind the smear campaign revealed, actually, about themselves. i will say this. i was inspired dan and i'm still inspired today by the courage, the resilience, and the fee which justin thomas endured through those months, and endured with appetite for service still intact! [applause] >> the very same grit that carried clearance through his birth in savannah, the same stubborn faithfulness if that kept faith in both his church and its country. even after they both let him down in ugly ways as a young black man. the same commitment to principle that compelled clearance to blaze and uncomfortable trail in washington, disrupting everybody's expectations. all of these virtues prove n

and harry reid changed the rules on the filibuster. so it's easier to confirm justices. it's not over. this will continue at the state level and pro life groups led by women will continue to fight it. >> there's one -- we want to play this for you, this is alexandria ocasio-cortez. this is her take today. watch. >> what the supreme court justices chose to do, endanger the lives of all women and all pregnant people in this country. not only that, they have chosen to strip rights from men, too. >> all birthing people. >> must not forget the birthing people. they're now the most important people on the planet. because they're being included in everything. i think the real injustice today is that i am the only male on this panel. still not in the center seat. think about that. what is that? what is that? in all seriousness, it's as bad as the knicks trades last night. tim dude here. sports humor there. one lucky guy. i'll be short because i'm the only guy here. even though my opinion matters more than all of you combined. there's an obvious one sentence explanation. guns are

it will not work as it did not work for harry reid when he lowered the threshold of votes needed to confirmnnell later checked that and applied it to supreme court justices. it never works out well. >> sandra: rehman, said to have you appear president biden me while getting some bad news at the g7 on middle eastern oil ahead of the controversial saudi arabia trip. apparently bad enough that an advertiser cut off the world leader. it is caught on video. on the followed continues after nancy pelosi appeared to shuffle a congresswoman's daughter at a photo of you >> she is clearly elbowing the little girl out of the way. for whatever reason, it does not look good, and i wish that some of the time she would just answer for herself. >> sandra: now the speakers campus responding to the controversy. and so was i congresswoman. our power panel is here, next. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ n homeowner who needs money for their family, it's a new day in america. air force, pararescue, five years. home values are at record highs. the newday 100 va loan lets veterans borrow up to 100% of their home's total value. and take an

harry reid, who got rid of the filibuster, if he hadn't done that, maybe democrats would be in powerer, then that ability budget there. this is a win for the constitution, the it's a win for the people. >> i agree, i understand what lindsay graham's saying this is a big win for the pro-life advocates, but really what it came town to was original originalism based on the constitution, and that's what scotus ruled on this past week. it was about the original concept of the constitution and, therefore it's going to be delivered to the states. so it is much more legal than it is political and moral. >> and the supreme court is saying specifically let alabama be alabama, let california be california, and if there is a problem and you disagree with your state's haws, it is now back in your hands, and you can vote those people out or you can vote with your feet and leave. thank you, panel. coming up on "the big sunday show," president biden's sped spending spree continues with a $200 billion promise to help rest of the world while americans suffer with record high inflation at home. but is

a lot about judicial philosophies in 2013 harry reid broke senate rules to change senate rules to set the threshold for confirmation at 51. i said at the time you may be sorry you did this. neither of those moves played out as colleagues intended neither did the disgraceful firestorm that would visit upon justice thomas and jenny back in 1991. i'm not going to dwell on that episode tonight. there's no reason to we all know what the people behind the smear campaign revealed actually about themselves. but i'll say this i was inspired then and i'm still inspired today by the courage. the resilience in the faith with justice thomas endured those months and emerged with an appetite for service. still intact the very same grit that carried clarence through pinpoint. and savannah the same stubborn faithfulness that led him ultimately to keep faith. in both his church and his country even after they both let him down. in ugly ways as a young like man the same commitment to principle that compelled clarence to blaze and uncomfortable trail in washington. disrupting everybody's expectations all

the filibuster rule will open doors to republicans for what they want to pass, we saw this when harry reidthink there should be caution for democrats filling out the filibuster at this point? >> i've never one that is a big believer in changing the filibuster rules, i understand the impulse on a lot of the democrats, but you take that energy and channel it at the ballot box. i think that republicans who believe last week that a sweep of the house and the senate was something that was certain tea or foregone, i think that they should relook at this and perhaps a reset will be needed, because a majority of the country is against a lot of the things that the court has done over the last two weeks. i am against changing the filibuster rule for these things. >> shannon: even more importantly, current members of the senate as we talked about, joe manchin and kyrsten sinema are against it and will stand at the block and we will see if anything changes as we look at the makeup of congress after the midterms and just mere weeks from now. thank you very much. ♪ ♪ finally tonight, as "special report"

don't know, sharon engel was a republican perceived as little out there in a very close election, harry reids weakest possible republican to be your opponent. and mitch mchad konl warned about this. but -- >> but he has. >> he supports herschel waurk. he doesn't think that. >> because it is georgia and he believes the fundamentals of the economy, gas prices, and even frankly probably people anticipate will happen with the supreme court in georgia. the issue to, you know, pull another obscure out of the woodwork, if you recall todd aiken -- legitimate rape, right? and that became an albatross for republicans across the countries. i think there is a real risk with candidates like herschel walker saying things that become a risk for the republican brand, across the country. >> but let me -- let me posit another jury, which is the overton window, which is the evolution of that which is acceptable discourse has changed so significantly, especially in republican-party politics but also democrat party politics as well, so significantly, they share an angle or todd aiken might win maybe in 2022. >>

harry reid, bless his soul, has passed away. he had that state wired for democrats.e a democrat running for re-election in battleground state this year. >> you're right. one thing that's interesting is she's not really contested in the election, yet they're on the doors, the largest culinary union in the state, the third most diverse state in our country. she can't show up in august just because she's not being challenged right now, saying hey, i have been with you, vote for me. she is saying i have to hit the doors, excite people. in a state like nevada, i remember in 2020, canvassing is huge there. tactically, to win, you need to hit the doors. so to start early, we weren't able to do that in the pandemic of 2020, and it was challenging. and i think getting ahead of the ball is good, but it is going to be tough. >> you want to see how tough, so take a look at this. democratic senator patty murphy in washington state, that is a democratic state, and she is the most powerful democratic woman in the senate. and she is out with a new tv ad in june in the seattle market

cortez masto, successor of the late senator harry reid, is making her first real reelection campaign in the swing states and as we reported earlier, a major development in south carolina where voters have chosen to oust congressman tom price from office. this is a significant outcome because rice voted to impeach trump over the january six capital riot. rice is the first of the 10 house republicans who voted to impeach trump to lose a reelection. the five term congressman was defeated by state representative russell frye. frye was endorsed by trump. rice was a strong supporter of trump's policies in washington but said he was left no choice but to impeach him. and congresswoman nancy maes, another south carolina republican who angered trump currently hovering just above the 50 percent threshold needed to avert a runoff in her gop primary. stay tuned to fox news will be bringing you full primary election results on fox and friends. first, i'm marianne rafferty. >> we now return to tucker carlson . this isn't a serious person, by contrast. so thanks for coming on . so you thinknk of su

harry reed -- harry reid was the majority leader. barack obama had just been elected president and you will recall senate democrats was exulted. senator schumer was on tv saying we were in the sweet spot to finally pass far-reaching gun control. and i will tell you the colleagues on my side of the aisle were discouraged and demoralized, and many thought there was nothing we could do to stop the agenda that was being pushed forward. i can tell you, i didn't believe it then and i don't believe it now. and so i sat down and drafted legislation designed to actually do what every person in this chamber i believe really wants to do, which is stop violent crime, stop these murders, stop the next lunatic who would shoot up a school or shoot up a church or shoot up a mall or shoot up a grocery store. the legislation i drafted was called grassley-cruz. i teamed up with my colleague, the senior senator from iowa, chuck grassley. grassley-cruz focused on several things. first of all, it focused on strengthening the background check system. it re

like kamala harris growing up in montreal. as joy reid kamala is just a regular sister in the way that people say michelle obama's like your sister if your cousin became first lady. kamala harris is like if your cousin became vice president of the united states. i don't think she gets to show that personality often enough so people don't get a chance to know her. are you following this customer kamala harris is like your sister in the same way that michelle obama would be your sister if your sister was your cousin and also married to the president. why haven't we realized that before. as joy reid pointed out, most of the media is still white and male. those damn white males always hiding the sister-cousin connection. and for the first time we can see that our racism had blinded us for so long and the truth hurt, it was so painful that four days we had to wear sunglasses even indoors beer but was worth it, because at that point, we began a journy of contrition and self-discovery that was honestly well overdue. like adam kinzinger we finall

harry reid did that when barack obama came into office in order to push through obama's judges that he hadn't got rid of the filibuster and set that precedent for lower court judges. mitch mcconnell would never have been able to block merrick garland pretty never would've had enough votes to get rid of the filibuster for supreme court justices when democrats tried to filibuster neil gorsuch. if they had not done that, cavanaugh and cornie barrett would not be on the supreme court because there's no way mitch mcconnell would have gotten enough votes to eliminate to confirm them. roe might still be standing. they always tried to blow up institutions and it blows up in their faces. >> dana: thank you. we will be on top of this for the rest of the week. thank you. >> trace: democrats and are they midterms, voter registration data shows more than 1 million voters across 43 states switched to the republican party over the past year. as according to the associated press. he reports about 630,000 voters became democrats during the same period. this shift is most prominent among key swing voter

it was good for harry reid now they want to change it. >> brian: you want to abolish the filibuster game could lose the senate. three months republicans sitting there saying really? we now have a simple majority pass or stop everything. >> steve: the problem is the democrats realize that their base is disillusioned. it's like we have unified control of the federal government. we have got the house, we have got the senate, we have got the white house. why aren't they doing big structural things like getting rid of the filibuster or packing the court. so that, you know, that is why joe biden said on friday, you know, people are going to decide in november. ultimately some people will decide in november. everybody will base it on themselves. and what is the most important thing to them at that point, the first tuesday in november. is it abortion? or is it $5 gas? that's the soundbite we ran with lindsey graham and right now, according to the polls, he's right. >> brian: i would add this. one thing that becomes a national election is the senate. if they want to pack the court, you are going

we harry reid about the need to enforce our borders and change chain migration as well as chuck schumervantage is it to let 3 million people in over the course of four years? what changed to make them think it's in the best interest of our nation? >> ainsley: is it because they feel like they should do that because they feel like they are good people? >> brian: are you kidding? >> ainsley: or is it for votes? >> brian: they are losing the hispanic vote by the day. as soon as democrats realize hispanic vote is going republican. sthel realize let's dust off that wall that donald trump bought. >> ainsley: the cuban as that are living in miami, they liked president trump. because they don't like socialism. but the ones that are coming in from mexico, many of them like president biden. we heard them saying in tapachula is that how you say it? which is down there on the border of guatemala. they were saying please do not please end title 42. we want to come. tell biden we have a message. you promised joe biden. >> steve: ainsley, you asked if it were political why they would do that if you lo

. >> sean: you know, leo, joy reid complaining that kamala harris is treated unfairly by the white male media. first joe gets a lot more criticism than she does. can you explain our giggling vice-president that has a hard time, herself, communicating to the american people? because i'm having a hard time analyzing it. >> well, no, i can't. because, first of all, let me tell you right now, she's incompetent. she's unlikable. she's not qualified to be vice-president. she was selected for vice-president for all the wrong reasons. nothing to do with qualifications. and as far as the joy reid comment, the queen of playing the race card, let me be very clear. she -- kamala harris has an approval rating in the low 30s, that means 70% of this country do not approve of her, of all different colors and even members of her own party. and for a, for a vp to lose 11 to 12 staff members, 12 staff members in a year, that tells you she cannot manage her own office. final point. she cut her price for a photograph from 15,000 to 5,000. she would have to pay me to a a picture with her. i'm not interested

harris' unpopularity. the white male media. msnbc host joy reidnterview, "most of the media is still white and male and their take on kamala harris becomes the take. it becomes conventional wisdom." apparently, regarding her own talks with the vice president, she adds, "i was able to kick off my heels and talk real. we need more conversations like that." [laughter] her comments echo "new york times" reporting that kamala harris has complained that if she were any of her 48 predecessors, all of whom were white and male, coverage would be different. >> harris: well, why do i cover her the way that i cover her, steeped in facts and honesty and the fact that she hasn't been to the border when it's a crisis? and that she, you know, hired people to be in a casted film about space? that was one of her early things. i'm not white or male. by the way, i can talk with my shoes on. that sounds like the 1950s! what are we, barefoot and pregnant to be able to interview each other? [laughter] that crazy to me. i don't even know where that's coming from. if you

you know, leo joy reid complaining that kamala harris was treated unfairly by theis whiterl male media. well, first joe gets a lot she does.t joe gets a lot can you explain our giggling vice president that has a hard time herself communicating to the american people? becausein i'm having a hard time analyzing it? well, no, i can't because first of all, let me tell you right now she's incompetent. she's unlikable. she's unlikable. president. she wasas selected for vice t president for all the wrongo reasons, nothing to do with qualifications. and as far as the jury recommitj the queen of playing the race card, let me be very clear . kamala harris has a approval rating in the low 30s that 70 percent of this country do notf approve of of all differentrt colors and even members ofy. a,her own party . and for a for a vp to lose 11 to 12 staff members, 12 70%an a year, that tells you she cannot manage her own office. finall point, she cut her price for a photograph of fifty thousand to five thousand. she would have to pay mee tote take a picture with her. i'm notd interested in that. all rig

harris keeps it up? not longg. she does this all the time. she makes us better and as she does, she does her homework. joy reid told us it's the dumbing down of america. the dummies here can't see it, but kamala harris can see she's done the work here she was on monday talking to kids at the national museum ofat african-american history today to celebrate st. and think about it in terms of the context of history, knowingl that black people in america were not free for 400 years of slavery. okay, so again, there arer: a couple of different ways to assess that coin. the old us before we were reborn and since we're dealing in clichés now, we're just going to compare ourselves to a phoenix before we rose pho fr the ashes. of a new the old us would have said wait a second, tomoya harris. african-americans weren't actually enslaved for four in this country. that's's not true .e mi but we would havess missed the point. so what happened here is that kamala harris beforefo her time googled how long wasas there slavery in america? and she saw that had been four years since slaveryry beganca in america, which is true . b

plus, there's a never before seen interview with vice president kamala harris that the amazing joy reidtreaming on peacock. be sure to check this out as we put on for a black woman. coming up next, advocates have been fighting to end the disparity between crack and powder cocaine. will it finally happen? it is long past time. we are going to talk about this on the other side the. break to stay tuned. y tuned. centrum multigummies aren't just great tasting... they're power-packed vitamins... that help unleash your energy. loaded with b vitamins... ...and other key essential nutrients... ...it's a tasty way to conquer your day. try centrum multi gummies. now with a new look. it's time to get outdoorsy. it's hot! and wayfair has got just what you need. we need a rug. that's the one. yeah. yeah we're getting outdoorsy. save on outdoorsy furniture, decor, and more. you're so outdoorsy honey. what are you... spend less on everything outdoorsy at wayfair. ♪ wayfair you've got just what i need ♪ right now, we're all feelin' a little strapped. but weekends are still all about grilling. and walma

together.nd well,: the other day joy reid asked her about how she felt about ketanji jackson browne jackson being confirmed torm the supreme court. >> the anchors name got kamala harris thinking. i will tell you joy, i experienced great joy and i watched that with incredible joy and i cannot wait to see if that will only be matched by the joy that i experience when i see her take the oath, say the word joy and duckworth dropped from the ceiling. i'vell never seen anything like it. and i'll tell you what brings me joy. oh , no, no, i don't like it when you get of it. there is there is juneteenth and then on june 19th we also have 19th. it is laura ingraham's birthday on june 19th. so we want to commemorate i've gotten my life and look, i don't want no brown my i don't want to mess everything tell happy. thank you . thank you very much. i appreciate that you have many more here we leave these flowers. great. very exciting. i don't know what this wait and that's brings me joy. laura , just to watch e you firt such joy to discuss birthdays because birthdays bring joy. thank god we didn't lighthi anything on fire and a cake that would have blown the whole . all f right, r