that is how harvard uses race, harvard is supposee the model. this court should admit it was wrong harvard and wrong about letting the poison of racial classification seek back into education. it should be overruled for public and private schools that accept federal funds. >> mr. noris, would you spend some t the originalism argument that was made at the end of the last case? >> ably. in terms of the original meof the 14th amendment, the best source i have read is th brief henri argument in brown. ainstakingly details the legislative history at how the framerhe 14th amendment sought as a ban on all racial classificati the civil rights act of 1866 is discrimination, a series of colorblind measures and requir. there was a case with the court immediately recognized the purpose of this amendment was to eliminate racial classions, no matter who they benefited because racial classificat impose harms. the pushback is the post-ratificatioory but the history of the 14th evidence because there is massive resistance to the orignding of the text of the 14th

his parents went to harvard. under your system, when he checks african-american, he gets a tip, benefit from that. it is simply not the case that every blplicant get at it. will direct you want to page this includes tiful chart which represents an undisputed mode and the ones you cannot actually see to your far-right. >> i can't see it because it is far away. it is very close to zero. because there's only a little racial discrimination. cross are you asking me whether -- you asked me to answer a question that assumes harvard is discriminating on the basis of race? i can't accept that. chris is met with the case is about? discrimination against asian ameran >> there wasiscount one of the complete was that harvard wasn't intentionally discriminating against asian ameran the entire evidence of that case, all of the plaintiffs proof was that aanmericans are treated worse than white applicants. that there was prejudice, intentional discrimination. hat you do with the charts -- the academic and comparative treatment of

harvard could fix that. that would have had a greater impact of race that they were looking for but they chose not to. >> dana: jonathan turley. i wanted to ask you about something. it is curious about the decision to file a big lawsuit, right? what do you know about the plaintiffs and their -- they finally had enough, right? the straw that broke the camel's back or find the right case to figure oust a way to right a wrong in their opinion. what about their feelings today as this has taken quite a while to get to this moment. >> "new york times" tweet really shows, i think, why there is a sense of injury, particularly in the asian community. i have always said the greatest diversity that i value in my classes is class diversity. diversity of economic class. i find that students that came, as roger did, from more impoverished circumstances have the most interesting perspectives regardless of their race. many of the asian students are first or second generation. they come from working-class families that have

harvard is older than this country. so it often takes a long time at that institution for there to be major changes, so what level of action do they take. they released a statement saying they are committed to diversity as a key part of their essential values, well how quickly do they act on that? what kind of tool do that use? the next question is will there be more lawsuits to come? if you find other ways to essentially do affirmative action without affirmative action, you might get sued. and relitigating those same points over and over again. schools are trying to anticipate that as well. making sure that that's not the situation they end up right now, stephanie. >> harvard might be older than this country but every day is an opportunity to create a new tradition that represents a new country that we live in. a more diverse, hopefully, more welcoming. antonia, always good to see you. thank you for coming. >> thank you. >> when we come back, presidential biden sits down at 30 rock, what we heard from him on his big ne

harvard responded. it reads, we write today to reaffirm the fundamental principle that deep and transform active teaching, learning and research depend on a community of people of many backgrounds and lived experiences. quickly take a reaction to first of all their statement and today's huge decision. >> let's address harvard's statement. we'll look for ways to be racist even though the supreme court says it is unconstitutional to be racist. no doubt that harvard and other higher education institutions will continue to game the system to take people's race into account. the supreme court of the united states regented critical race theory. some race many is okay and some isn't okay. they said under the 14th amendment you cannot enact racist policies against anyone regardless of their race. >> julie: that's the concern is how are you going to hold these universities accountable to know they don't continue the wrongs of the past. love talking to you always. thank you for coming on with us today. thank you

a harvard graduate who testified in the harvard admissions case. madison, thank you so much for being here. i know how incredibly personal this decision is to you. because you testified at trial about your experience of being a black student at harvard. so tell us your reaction to the decision. >> cristobal, thank you so much for having me. i was talking to a family member today about how i have had about five years to prepare for this decision. with the expectation that it would come down this way. and i am still so sad. i am still pretty heartbroken about it. when i think about the ways that my experience would have been-limited had i not had the opportunity to be around a diverse student body, when i think of the losses that future black and brown students will face, looking forward, it is just pretty heartbreaking to me. >> let me try to share with you some of justice clarence thomas 's logic. in doing, he said he wanted to end affirmative action. and he wrote for a memo majority opinion that quote, it is youth should not shoulder the moral deb

so that's the response from harvard.ply certainly, but then they go on to say how important diversity is still to them, leaving the sense they are going to try to work to find a way to do it. >> look, this just shows the challenge facing our society. the legacy of centuries of racial discrimination is real and still with us. this over the past half a century was one of the ways we as a society tried to up end and undo that legacy of discrimination, especially against black people. this was not something the supreme court had previously ordered people to do. this was something universities and others wanted to do. now this supreme court has said, you can't. it really poses a challenge for how we are going to take seriously the continued legacy of racism and the passing on of racial inequality from generation to generation when the court has said you have to do it while pretending we're in a color blind society. >> you want to quickly ask elie honig while we have the time. because there are all these caveats that you heard

>> reporter: it's right in a 6-3 decision for harvard -- 6-2 decision for harvard and 6-3 decision for unc the justices are ending affirmative action as we know it. chief justice roberts puts this a lot of caveats on ways that schools can continue to try to bring people of color into their student bodies. by looking at things like their essay. he's saying, look, if someone has encountered adversity are where they've had to find courage because of their race, they should absolutely write about that in their essays when applying to college. it's just that race shouldn't be considered on the college application as a factor on its own. so there are a lot of factors where they're trying to bring in other ways that student bodies can continue to look at, whether it be socioeconomic diversity or the way race impacts a student or applicant's life. and that i find over and over in his opinion. i also just wanted to point out how many people wrote on this. it was justice thomas writing the majority. we also saw gorsuch and kavanaugh concur and write their own opinions, and then we saws dissent f

the reason i went to harvard or several, i feel harvard could give me a better background, a better liberalhan any other university. the point being, though, this is a school for the elite, for a very long time. joy reid, thank you so much. i know i kept you along tonight by truly generally appreciate your comments on this. fantastic. >> thank you, my friend, goodnight. >> coming up -- deeming race irr law life. justice ketanji brown jackson rips in today's supreme court decision in that dissent that joy just mentioned. the far-reaching implications of it, and we will read from it, next. don't go anywhere. inside of you. 50 years or older? ask your doctor about shingles. >> there were two dissents into a supreme court ruling, one from justice sonia sotomayor, and one from the newest justice ketanji brown jackson. justice jackson is the third black supreme court justice in our nation's long history, the first black woman on the high court. today, she wrote the rare dissent that i think will be quoted for years to come. she writes, quote, with let them eat cake obliviousness today, the majori

harvard's goal -- if you look back to the way harvard tried, at least in theory, to articulate its standard of admissions, what harvard has tried to do is to look at the individual applicant holistically. they run into trouble with respect to asian american admissions. that made this case more challenging for advocates of affirmative action. what the harvard plan had been was to try to see an individual for their entire background. your question about how that actually comes to fruition, we're going to have to see. some universities have a variety of qualitative measures. for example, you can write an essay. you can articulate your answers to certain short-form questions. universities are going to have to figure out, how do they try to get at the individual story? what is clear is what the court has said is that the explicit use of race as a factor, the explicit use, the question regarding race and the determination of that as part of the process, that strictly understood needs to end. they have to figure out how they assess what an individual brings to the table in a holistic form. >> okay

that's the harvard case.hat the court is sounding the bell on is in a zero-sum game like admitting people to classes, like choosing people to hire it's fallacy to say oh, we'll advantage some people because of their race and that doesn't hurt anybody else. that can't be right. it is a zero-sum game. you can't get out of pretending you're not discriminating by simply saying you're helping others. for your direct question, neil, employers should be reconsidering after this decision any race-based affirmative action programs in hiring using diversity as a pretext, as a cover for just quotas. the courts, the court is going to be vigilant to make sure that anybody who receives money from the government, anyone covered by ememployment laws lives up to the principle that the law and our con are color-blind. neil: amazing. no doubt there will be a lot of reverberations from this. you spell out great issues, john. always fruitful to talking to you. john hu, former university of berkeley professor and berkeley law. the

it was astounding to me when i testified in the harvard case is that one of the things that harvard should do is to get rid of the legacy preferences, and oh, no, we have to build relationships with the alumni and furthermore said that having, and this is unbelievable to me that having legacy preferences promoted diversity in their view, because the dean said, that having students who have had more experience with harvard interact with students who have had less experience with harvard makes them better citizen leaders, because they learn from one another. it is such a twisted rationale. and yes, legacy preferences should go, and i think that we will see the universities end those preferences in the very near future. >> all right. thank you so much for being with us. and with us now is michael gerhart at the university of north carolina, and burton craig, professor of jurisprudence, and you are obviously not just a member of the hair club, but you are also a member at unc, where this is going to have an immediate effect, and your take as someone who is there and your take as a law professo

the reason i went to harvard or several, i feel harvard could give me a better background, a better liberalhan any other university. the point being, though, this is a school for the elite, for a very long time. joy reid, thank you so much. i know i kept you along tonight by truly generally appreciate your comments on this. fantastic. >> thank you, my friend, goodnight. >> coming up -- deeming grace irrelevant in law does not make it so in life. justice ketanji brown jackson rips in today's supreme court decision in that dissent that joy just mentioned. the far-reaching implications of it, and we will read from it, next. don't go anywhere. nywhere. the virus that causes shingles is sleeping... in 99% of people over 50. it's lying dormant, waiting... and could reactivate. shingles strikes as a painful, blistering rash that can last for weeks. and it could wake at any time. think you're not at risk for shingles? it's time to wake up. because shingles could wake up in you. if you're over 50, talk to your doctor or pharmacist about shingles prevention. why do dermatologists choose dove? the dov

first we have medicine tried who is a harvard graduate who testified in the harvard admissions case.ou for being here. i know how personal this decision is to you because you have testify at trial about your experience of my black student at harvard so tell us your reaction to the decision. >> thank you for having me. i was talking to a family member of about how i've had five years to prepare for this decision with the expectation it would come down this way and i was so sad. i'm still pretty heartbroken about it. when i think about the ways that my experience would've been limited had i not had the opportunity to be around a diverse student body think about the losses that future students will face looking forward. it's pretty heartbreaking to me. >> let me try to share with you some of justin clarence thomas's logic in doing it. but he wanted to end up limited -- and affirmative action that today's youth should not shoulder the moral death of their ancestors and also says that racialism simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism, so what you think of his logic? >> i th

adam is our chief trial counsel and students for fear admissions versus harvard. my name is edward blum. i am the founder and president for students for fair admissions. the opinion issued today by the united states supreme court marks the beginning of the restoration of the colorblind legal covenant that binds together our multiracial, multiethnic nation. the polarizing, stigmatizing and unfair jurisprudence that allowed colleges and universities to use a student's race and ethnicity as a factor to either admit them or reject them has been overruled these discriminatory admissions the integrity of our civil rights laws, ending racial preferences in college admissions is an outcome, but the vast majority of all americans, of all races, will celebrate. university does not have real diversity when it simply assembles students who look different but come from similar backgrounds and talk and act and think alike. moreover, these opinions reestablish the founding principles of the 1964 civil rights act, which clearly forbids treating americans differently by race. let

we were having the harvard house conversation, when i was at harvard, there were a lot of legacies. lot of people who didn't get in because they had good grades. they had mommy and grand daddy's name on a building. they can still get in. their affirmative action seems quite in place. what do you make of that. >> i totally agree. that's still true today. there's also, you know, we have seen it in other cases like the back door, the side door, other ways to get into harvard. but they just struck it down just for black students and brown students on campus. to be able to have specific access due to, like, disadvantages in specific circumstances. >> when i was there, one of the other experiences i had is the so-called affirmative action kids were some of the most brilliant i ever met. ketanji brown jackson was there when i was here. this is a brilliant human being, and they were hard working. the affluent kids didn't have to work as hard. i wonder what you make of the fact this court seems to think choosing students like you is an affront to the constitution? >> no, it's really crazy. a

and a recent graduate from harvard college and former copresident of the harvard korean association.ssumed leadership of hka while the amicus brief preparations were underway with the legal defense fund through the naacp. i feel strongly about the importance of building diverse educational environments and understanding how affirmative action played a critical role in that, but i think sing the collective efforts from other student organizations and advocating for this college was the greatest privilege. i can only speak to my own experiences as one student, an asian american woman at harvard, but i can say with full confidence that those who subscribe to the widely publicized view of what it means to "deserve a position" at an ivy league position, what it means to champion "merit-based admissions" they have not met the incredible students, especially students of color i was lucky enough to call my peers at harvard and i did not know that gpa or test scores of every student i met, but what i did know was there unique stories, the stories they had to share, they enhanced my own life a

por su parte en un comunicado la universidad de harvard condenÓ los actos.u cuerpo a la ciencia no deben desanimarse. >> donar nuestro cuerpo salvavidas porque cuando se dona podemos utilizar pulmones, hÍgado, corazÓn, cÓrneas estos Órganos ayudan a otras personas que lo necesitan ya que hemos fallecido. fabiola: agrega que quien controla todas las familias para lo que han creado una pÁgina web y una lÍnea 1800. en nueva york, fabiola, univisiÓn. leon: los avances de la ciencia no deja de sorprendernos. una nueva

you look at harvard specifically, a team of harvard economists looked at harvard and asked how many ofe coming from the bottom 20% of americans, and they found only 3% of their students were coming from what would really be the poor. that number inched up a little bit over late 2000s, early 2010s to 5%. what that means is harvard has achieved perfect black representation. that's very rare for an elite institution. it's done that several years in a row but because of these statistics, what we know is that when harvard lets in around 154 black students each freshman class, only 3 to 5% are coming from the black poor. it's not a high number, which means they have over represented the black, middle and upper classes. >> it's not economically diverse is what you're saying? >> it's not economically diverse at all. >> and not experientially diverse entirely. >> not entirely. if you were to ask anyone including the supreme court justices, being in a classroom with a black student who comes from the student who was from the projects, and one coming from the upper middle class, is that redundant

we need to take a better look at this. >> i want to move on to the harvard body parts. harvard said we are appalled to learn that something so disturbing could have happened on our campus. the incidents are a betrayal of harvard medical school and each individuals who all true strictly chose to weld their bodies to advance medical education and research. is there a black market that we don't know of? what are they doing with the body parts? >> it's sick and disturbing and heartbreaking. when i was in anatomy, i never thought this could happen but some people are doing it for financial gain, and some like it is a trophy or souvenir. sometimes they sell it to make leather to use it as artwork but for some people it's some deep psychological issues that need to be addressed and is unfortunate we are seeing this on social media. >> and maybe the most important thing so many headlines about rising cancer rates in young people. here are some of the factors. excess alcohol, smoking, obesity, abnormal sleep, bearing children at a late age the list goes on in your thoughts on wh

we know justice jackson was recusing herself on the harvard case because ofth her involveme with harvard university in the past.f he >> certainly. these cases were argued, i think, in november or december. this is not unusual.unusual. often the court has these big decisions that people are waiting for and keep them until the end of the term.he justice thomas wrote separately to explain how he believes the decision today was consistent with how the 14th amendment has been understood. be justice enkavanaugh in contrast wrote to talk about how he concludes that this opinion today is consistent with past precedent. in general, at every level this case has been considered, i think judges have taken a very careful look. tragically, one of the lead attorneys on the case at the beginning passed ataway earlier this year from brain cancer. when folks arein looking at universities like this with w wonderful reputations who are educating a lot of leaders in of our society, they will take a careful look and evaluate the constitution and try to figure out now, more than 100 years after the 14th amendm

he was rejected from harvard a few years ago. so my right is thomas mccarthy, typical spelling. thomas,thomas, mccarthy. tom is the founding partner of the law firm and our chief trial counsel in students for fair admissions versus the university of north carolina. to my left is adam, and r, ca ra, adam is with the law firm formerly with bartlett beck. adam is our chief trial counsel in students for fair admissions. >> -- >> these discriminatory admissions practices undermine the integrity of our civil rights laws. ending racial preferences in college admission is an admissie of the vast majority of all americans, of all races will celebrate. a university doesn't have real diversity when it's simply -- when it simply assembles students who look different, but come from similar backgrounds and talk and act and think alike. moreover, these up ins reestablish the founding principles of the 1964 civil rights act, which clearly forbids treating americans differently by race. let me quote, at the signing ceremony of the act on july the second, 1964, president lyndon johnson made these

in the 1980s, you taught at harvard. and during that era, you self-identified as a reagan republican but later then became disillusioned with the right in the mid 1990s. tell me about that evolution and what happened. >> well, i think it begins in graduate school in the '70s for me, when i'm studying economics at m.i.t. and i become acquainted with ideas about free markets and capitalism that appealed to me -- the virtues of democratic, liberal, free-market society -- so that i wapredisposed to give the reagan conservatives a hearing. but as you say, i became disillusioned in the fullness of time. i guess i thought that many of my compatriots on the right were more interested in saying that the liberals were wrong about the urban crisis than they were in actually getting involved in solving the problems. and i had some personal things that were happening with me -- a religious conversion. i went through a crisis -- midlife crisis in my life, and i became a born again christian in the late '80s and early '90s. and that al

he passed away when he realized that his father's body was part of the plan of harvard university and he was terrified . fbi agents arrested this man yesterday and rigelage is accused when he was the director of the morgue of harvard medical school . the inspectors say that this process is clear its country dates back to 2019. the lodge started stealing the brain, skin, and bones of corpses that were donated to this college for educational purposes. the dollar has been sold, it cannot do such a thing, which means that i should be punished for the families of the deceased. among the buyers named in the indictment, we can mention katrina mcqueen, who acquired the property from a store that sells creatures that advertise zahra was shaking the group according to officials, others were allowed to enter the mortuary and choose what they wanted to buy. items were sold for hundreds of dollars each. in one case, the skin that was sold was said to have been turned into leather. described the betrayal and we are the family who cooperated with this faculty who are facing the loss of their mother

i've heard a number of if harvard does away with, and harvard was one of the defendants in the lawsuitsed admissions policy, 43% of the students will be asian at harvard. that's based on merit. that's the way it should be. it should not be a system that discriminates against people because of the colour of their skin or their ethnicity or their background in other ways. we want to look at merit and admit people to universities based on merit. about students who come from a disadvantaged background? disadvantaged background ? according to disadvantaged background? according to the new york times after michigan band race—conscious admissions in 2006, like undergraduate enrolment declined at the university of michigan and the share of black students fell to 4% in 2021 from 7% in 2006. are you concerned that we may see a big drop in african—american attendance at use bachar for us universities? i’m attendance at use bachar for us universities?— universities? i'm also concerned _ universities? i'm also concerned with - universities? i'm also concerned with the i universities? i'm also - con

i've heard a number that if harvard does away with their — and harvard was one of the defendants in thispolicy, 43% of the students will be asian at harvard. that's based on merit. that's the way it should be. it should not be a system that discriminates against people because of the colour of their skin or their ethnicity or their background in other ways. we want to look at merit and admit people to universities based on merit. what about students who come from a disadvantaged background? so, according to the new york times, after michigan banned race—conscious admissions in 2006, black undergraduate enrolment declined at the university of michigan and the share of black students fell to 4% in 2021 from 7% in 2006. are you concerned that we might see a big drop in african—american attendance at us universities? i'm also concerned with the graduation rate of minority students at the same universities. i think that there is a focus that we need to bring to k through 12 education in inner cities. we need to make sure that we reduce the influence of teachers�* unions and we need to provide

shocking allegations at harvard medical school. the manager of the school morgue is charged with running a scheme to sell body parts from corpses donated for research. one outraged family who donated to the school speaks out later, bud light dethroned america's new choice in beer and spirits this summer and dream come true. the uber driver now getting the opportunity of a lifetime. i'm teeing off at the us open his message about hard work and determination. from abc news in new york. this is america this morning. a very good thursday morning to you. i'm lionel moise, in for rhiannon. i'm andrew dymburt. we begin with extreme weather, severe storms on the move across the south overnight. millions are also bracing for record heat today while another part of the country sees the worst air quality in decades as overnight , more power outages from severe weather across the south. more than 150,000 customers affected . from georgia to texas, the national weather service confirms a tornado caused this damage near savannah, georgia. video

so how did these harvard officials decide that this was going to be the racial mix of every single harvard freshman class year after year after year? well, it wasn't based solely on merit. so if harvard is deciding the perfect racial by chart year after year, and it doesn't even reflect the demographics of the country, someone's being racially discriminateed against and that's unconstitutional. the court says schools can still consider financial background, but can't assume a black applicant is poor just because they're black. clarence thomas writing again, this. quote, individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges and accomplishments. what matters is not the barriers they face but how they choose to confront them. and their race is not to blame for everything, good or bad, that happens in their lives. a contrary myopic world view based on individual's skin color to the total exclusion of their personal choices is nothing short of racial determineism. race dot not value your success in life we're all born with free will and we can decide how we live our lives. black peopl

her body was also donated to harvard. her daughters now want her body returned.he's down there, down there. and we want her back. the morgue manager and the alleged buyers face charges, including conspiracy and interstate transport of stolen goods. all right. well, a new twist in a 2018 case of discrimination at a starbucks five years ago. you may remember the arrest of two black men waiting to meet someone at a philadelphia restaurant that sparked protests and a boycott at all, 8000 starbucks locations were temporarily closed to teach their workers about racial bias. it also led to the firing of a regional manager. well, this week that manager was awarded $25 million in a federal civil rights case. a jury agreed with shannon phillips that she was fired because she was white. starbucks has not commented on the verdict. also from philadelphia, the zoo is looking into the deaths of five meerkats. the animals died over the course of three days earlier this month. officials think they may have accidentally been poisoned. a zoo executive believes the meerkats may have

the court said it cannot be a factor deciding who gets into college, including harvard and unc. chief justice said here, the student must be treated on his or her experience, not on basis of race. many universities have done the opposite and concluded wrongly touch stone of individual ability is not lessons learned, but color of their skin, constitutional history does not tolerate that choice. he read from the decision and so did justice thomas. devastating impact of this decision cannot be overstated, this will entrench racial segregation, racial inequality will exist as long as it is ignored. if people want to write about experiences they have had, where they came from, none of that is barred and no university is barred from considering that. they can't use that to get around the process. one member of congress hank johnson, now saying this demands they expand the supreme court. he will offer legislation to do just that. emily. >> emily: thank you. bringing it back to the couch now. kayleigh, you contrast as shannon just said, words of sonia sotomayor, she says the court is no

you're hearing realtime reaction from college students at harvard. what are you hearing?reporter: well, students tell me they are still processing this news, that it's come like a gut punch to the majority of them, even though they have had a lot of time to prepare for this moment, since the earliest stages of this lawsuit, people say they knew it was going to make its way to the supreme court and this result was likely. it still shocked many of them, and their concern is not so much for themselves but more for the generations of students coming up behind them, students like them who come from all kinds of communities. i spoke to one student who is to his knowledge, the only ecuadorian in his class who comes from a community in new mexico, and he's worried about what other kids like him who haven't listen looked at closely by universities like harvard, what is going to happen to them next. i want dwrou take a listen to a conversation i had with that student, and a high schooler planning to apply to harvard this fall. >> i hope this is an opportunity to harvard to step up

the reaction from harvard students, sadness and anger. i'm infuriated in speech. this is just racism. it's just racism with a very thin veil. i've just met so many people from so many different cell phones and like it will just if my heart for harvard and the university of north carolina had argued that they were using rates as an admissions factor in order to create a student body that would be more sensitive to the diversity of the united states and does create a generation of future leaders that with us be more responsive to the challenges in the years ahead. the supreme court said that's a laudable goal, but it's not enough to justify violating the us constitution. russell and jordan elders 0 the supreme court mentorship o'conny is the executive director of the a p. i a, a equity along in se coalition that advocates full the rights of asian americans and pacific islander communities. and she joins us now from los angeles, kentucky with us on the program is cool. connie, i just begin with your response to the ruling by the supreme court. well, you know, we had

the practice of harvard university, i'm the university of north carolina. as in 59, his democratic party have condemned the decision, while republicans welcomed it wasn't george's report. 2 of the oldest universities in the united states, harvard and the university of north carolina have used race as one of the many factors to admit potential qualified students. but a group of asian american students suit u. n. c and harvard, claiming the practice, denied them access to an elite education in favor of lots are qualified african american and latino applicants. on thursday, the us supreme court agreed ruling 6 to 3 that using raise as a factor violated the 14th amendment to the constitution. and the 1964 civil rights there. while opposing groups of students reacted to the ruling on the court steps. demand behind the students lawsuits celebrate these obligations compel the removal of all racial and ethnic classification boxes from undergraduate and post graduate application forms. the incoming president of harvard said the school is now reworking the way it adm

let's look at harvard defendant in this case. applicants with the highest test scores and gpas had different acceptance rates depending on what their race was. asian-american students had below a 13% acceptance rate. white americans were just about 15. but african-american students in the same group had over 50% acceptance rate. is that what the left is calling equality? in their eyes, equality is diversity. >> i have always believed that one of the greatest things about america is our diversity. but i believe that. if you have any doubt about this look at the united states military. the finest fighting force in the history of the world has been a model of diversity and has not only made our nation better, stronger, but safer. i believe the same is true for our schools. >> not the most qualified, but the most diverse. a statement from former first lady michelle obama said this. this is a quote. heartbreaks for any young person out there who is wondering what their future holds. michelle is telling young americans who have never l

this time, it's the university of north carolina and harvard. other areas as well. unless this has consequences, we allow 45 to get elected and he puts people on supreme court, one of them illegitimately, those three people just delivered what he expected them to deliver. >> congressman, one argument is that if the goal is to create a more level playing field that needs to start in kindergarten, not college. so really the attention should be in trying to increase funding for public k through 12 schools that are majority black, rather than having colleges make up for all of this. >> we do. that is what we've got, lyndon johnson and the great society programs, they were against that. that is what -- was all about. they were against that. all of these things that were brought on were -- and they are still under funding and -- to try to get rid of them. so we can do both, there's no question. when you've got young people coming out of high school, straight days, many of them go through college, straight a's. and still cannot get into a professional

at harvard university abc reported that the director of the morgue of harvard medical school in the united states is accused of stealing and selling the body parts of a body donated to this school. roozbeh died in 2019. the agents were horrified to find out that his father's body was part of the plan of harvard university. this man was arrested yesterday . zari klach is accused. when the director of the morgue of harvard medical school stole and sold the body parts of his uncle's body, the investigators say that this trend in his country goes back to 2019. that for the educational shop was donated to this college. he is accused of selling the body parts to his house with the help of his wife for the value of 10,000 dollars. this means that they do not care about the families of the deceased. i should be punished by them. it can be pointed out to katrina mccann, who is a store that sells creatures that shock the mind and shake the soul under the advertising slogan. choose slow dollar sold said in this case the skin that was sold can be turned into leather. harvard medical school described t

stanford and harvard researchers mapped the changes in students performances, and in some districts, students fell behind by as much as a grade level or more, and others, they say the difference between test scores was minimal. so, it is all over the map, and test scores declined more where students were learning remotely versus in person. we want to start the conversation on the high school level now. joining me now, the principle of thorough good high school , did you tell your students you weret yet. >> they will ha catch it di i educators, it was hard, so thank you so much. lessons learned to set yourstudents up for success? >> the biggest lesson that was learned, we had to take an individual approach, because everybody had a different situation based on the pandemic. how much their parents could be involved and how much they couldn't be involved. as of school, we had to think deeply about how do we make sure our young people stay connected to the school and stay a part of the community, even when they are home. and how do we make sure the students are having their basic needs me

schools of choice, do not let this ruling be an end to talented students getting into schools like harvard and unc and to ensure our future leaders of the country represent the multiracial makeup of our society. our nation's future depends on races internet disease is gather to achieve diversity in higher education and of thriving multiracial democracy. having multiracial diversity helps everyone including asian americans, diversity brings us new perspectives. it is important to remember that talent is everywhere and it is incumbent on all of us to ensure we create real pathways to unlock that talent in every student, no matter what community they come from. i have a specific message for those asian americans who joined them in this court case. i am now calling you into our movement to ensure no student in a community of color is discriminated against or marginalized because of today's ruling. you have an obligation to create a new and better system than the one you helped dismantle. we -- we must work to improve our schools so that all children have safe access to quality education and re

the reaction from harvard students, sadness and anger. i'm infuriated in speech. this is just racism. it's just racism with a very thin veil. i've just met so many people from so many different cell phones and like, it will just put is my heart for people. harvard and the university of north carolina had argued that they were using rates as an admissions factor in order to create a student body that would be more sensitive to the diversity of the united states. and does create a generation of future leaders that with us be more responsive to the challenges in the years ahead. the supreme court said that's a laudable goal, but it's not enough to justify violating the us constitution. russell and jordan elders 0 the supreme court. millions in the us are living in areas with dangerous and quantity because of why fi is in canada. they being is just stay indoors where masks outdoors and avoid exposure if they have asthma or the respiratory problems. john henry, for some chicago, a combination of canadian wildfires, a northerly wind is blanketing a 100000000 americans i

the reaction from harvard students, sadness and anger. i'm infuriated in speech. this is just racism. it's just racism with a very thin veil. i've just met so many people from so many different cell phones and like it will just break my heart for people in the harvard and the university of north carolina had argued that they were using rates as an emissions factor in order to create a student body that would be more sensitive to the diversity of the united states and does create a generation of future leaders that with us be more responsive to the challenges in the years ahead. the supreme court said that's a laudable goal, but it's not enough to justify violating the us constitution. russell and jordan l 20. the supreme court. well joining us line from washington dc is marshall anthony . he's research director the institute for college access and success set marshall good to have you with our. so what's your response been to this routing by the supreme court? i was actually mean in practice at the race conscious college admissions. no harm. in fact, thank you so

and schools like harvard. they're worried about kids like them trying to get access to these schools in the future and they often point to california as an example that's fueling those anxieties. that's because more than two decades ago, when they got rid of affirmative action, minority enrollment fell by about 50%. those were very devastating numbers for the minorities on campus there, for professors who were teaching courses and trying to support those students who continued to study the ramifications of all of that, and the university system there has tried different alternatives. they've tried to recruit students of color, create programs and pipelines, but they've found they couldn't bring themselves back up to the level of diversity that they would like to see, and that's where the concern is going to happen here on this campus. already this spring, so just a couple of weeks ago when students around the country and world found out their acceptances to harvard, we saw those numbers tick down a bit. the nu

stealing and selling body organs at harvard university. abc1 reported that the director of the morgue of harvard medical school in america is accused of stealing and selling body parts from corpses donated to this school. his father's body is also gone part of the map of harvard university is horrified. officers arrested this man yesterday's films and rigelage is accused. when the director of the morgue of harvard medical school stole and sold the body parts of his uncle's body, investigators say that this trend of the country goes back to 2019. he stole the head, brain, skin, and bones of corpses that were donated to this college for the educational store. he is accused of taking the body parts to his house and selling them for 10 thousand dollars with the help of his wife. one can do such a thing. to do something means thinking about the families of the deceased i should not be punished, who are mentioned in the indictment , can be katrina mcqueen, who is the owner of kis parikar, a store that , under the advertising slogan, offers creat

university according to the network according to this network, the director of the morgue of harvard medical school is accused of stealing and selling the body parts of the bodies donated to this school. the daughter of the sheriff of new hampshire, who died in 2019 after realizing that her father's body was part of the plan of harvard university, was washed away . he was arrested when the clutch is accused who was the director of the morgue of harvard medical school, stole the body parts of his uncle's corpse, the investigators say that this trend in his country goes back to 2019 , he is accused of stealing the head, brain, skin, and bones of the dead body that were donated to this school for the educational store to read the body parts, and with the help of his wife, he sold them for 10 thousand dollars. one can do such a thing. it means that the families of the deceased do not care. i should be punished. they are mentioned in the indictment. he pointed out that it is someone's property the figure of the store, which offers creatures under the advertising slogan that shocks and sha

if you look at the way things were, she's a realist when it comes to this, at harvard -- harvard started the 1600s. it's much older than the united states. for 300-plus years they allowed into the college 12 or fewer black students prior to 1970. all of that changed when affirmative action was created. and the minute it happens, it gives rise to this extraordinary group of people who go on to run major corporations. they're running merrill lynch and they're running american express, merck. and then right behind that you get the cohort in the 1990s with a guy named barack obama, and ketanji brown jackson, and so sonia sotomayor talks about this as well this is what it was intended to do. this is why it's not just something that's irrelevant as justice thomas seemed to insist that it might be. >> to your point, also, we have to remember there was a day when justice clarence thomas was an advocate for affirmative action. he has talked openly about how it was one of the things that propelled him into yale law school. then he became very critical of what it meant for him and others after. wha

the reaction from harvard students, sadness and anger. i'm infuriated in speech. this is just racism. it's just racism with a very thin veil. i've just met so many people from so many different cell phones and like, it will just put is my heart for people. harvard and the university of north carolina had argued that they were using rates as an admissions factor in order to create a student body that would be more sensitive to the diversity of the united states. and does create a generation of future leaders that with us be more responsive to the challenges in the years ahead. the supreme court said that's a laudable goal, but it's not enough to justify violating the us constitution. russell and jordan elders 0 the supreme court. some of russia's highest ranking generals haven't been seen in public since the new 3 by was the national rates on saturday. you asked me to report, say russia security service the f s b. well, on top general, very good rest them of about you have any provisions planned rebellion. there are some of the deputies, so guy. so robinson is also