strzok interviewed hillary clinton. and james baker revealed that hillary clinton's phoney russian dossier played into the investigation of trump. clinton paid for. it it was not verified and the author. he doesn't stand by it. in other words, there would have been no probable cause to investigate the campaign without clinton's dirty russian dossier. baker read the dossier. he admits prior to the election. that came out today. a personal relationship with the law firm that the clinton campaign funneled to the money to, to hire fusion gps to hire christopher steele. who then used phoney russian dirt to impact an election. baker admitted he was the intermediary between perkins and the fbi. baker admitted he had contact with the reporter david corn prior to the election about the dossier. he said corn a left wing-activist wanted to get the dossier into the hands of the fbi. comey's number 1 lawyer james baker knew about rampant pro-hillary clinton and anti-trump bias to impact the election. they did nothing to stop it. eve

leave hillary alone. okay. we hear hillary today. i thought then it was a mistake and i don't think is he thinking that anymore. you see the fbi investigation. nunes report house intel. now mueller, no collusion, no obstruction. and still they cannot control themselves. media or democrats. that, to me, helps you. >> oh, of course it helps us. i mean, everybody on the left is so unhinged that there wasn't anything in the mueller report. now it's finally out. now we can finally take a look at it and, again, as we all said from the beginning, no collusion, there is nothing that this president has done wrong. but look at all he has accomplished, sean. despite the fact that they have tried every single day that he did something wrong. our campaign did something wrong. they fight him every day. resist him every day. obstruct what he wants to do all the time. this country right now under this president is the most successful than it has been in decades. >> sean: we have an announcement coming up after the show -- later in the show not after

embrace the idea that russians could have dirt in hillary cln? >> why did the special prosecutor come to the conclusion it wasn't e struction? that particular on clears them of completely. because he's very embarrassed. he knows that he didn't follow up on all the suggestions that it was a setup. that's why this was a one-sided investigation.gg the bit takeaway of all is where's the interest in trying to figure out how could it be t th fbi investigated this in two separate investigations, used four wiretaps in order to do it, four -- four electronic surveillances, talked to 500 witnesses, spent $40 million, and the answer is there was no, not the slightest bit of evidence, of piracy between trump, anyone on the trump campaign, and the russians. that was the story, not this stuff underneath it. >> it is now okay for political campaigns toork with material stolen by foreign adversaries? >> it depends on the stolen material. first of all, was it all right for "the new york times" and the "washington post" to print ai agnst the objection of the pres>

hillary wanting to run for president, writing "the hillary cover-up operation, work ticket, archive, clean up." cover-up operation? then they go further, they actually give the exact date that they used the bleach pit to wipe the server clean, and the official being interviewed stated that the cover-up operation, email "probably related to a change to 60 day email retention policy back up." we know now, just a few months later, platte river networks downloaded the bleach pit from a vendor source called source forge at 11:42 a.m., march 31st, 2015 for what was happening then? oh, the democratic candidates were debating, trying to get the nomination. wow. perfect time to get rid of all of this. we know the exact second she obstructed justice in this case. that was after thect deletions. prior to the beating up of the devices with hammers. bleach pit used on her server. let's sum this up. so the fbi have proof that hillary clinton mishandled hundreds if not thousands of top secret, classified emails. a clear violation of the espionage took place, and then bend over backwards, they didn'

it says russians have dirt on hillary clinton. it didn't say stolen, taken, and nothing connects it to donald trump. why didn't they tell him this was a problem like they did with feinstein which she had a chinese communist spy influence her? >> i want to -- >> let me finish. they told her, they told her she had a spy working for her. trump didn't have a spy working for him. trump turns out to be totally innocent. >> why so angry at the russians? >> because the russians didn't try to frame him. he's angry at the russians for interfering in the election. he's angrier at the people who tried to take away his presidency based on a plan done by strzok, prevent and remove. and you avoid it. the slightest evidence about trump, boom, this is real evidence. it's real evidence that the steele dossier is phony. that it was a fraud on the court. >> all right. steele dossier barely mentioned in the mueller report for what it's worth. i think this has been -- >> yeah, for good reason. you make my point. for good reason. it makes him innocent.

call the fbi when the russians offered dirt on hillary clinton? >> i wonder if there isn't an argument that the people had a right to know that information about hillary clinton? people had a right to know that hillary clinton and the people around her were as dishonest as they are. >> why not run an honest political campaign depicting that? why youz a foreign adversary? >> nobody used them. >> donald trump jr. accepted the wikileaks -- >> i let you read all that, but i notice you didn't read there was no evidence of collusion with the russians by trump or anyone in the trump campaign. there was no involvement. >> but they wanted to. should that bother americans they wanted to. >> if somebody on the campaign wanted to do something wrong -- a lot of people on hillary clinton's campaign wanted to do something wrong. the legal standard that makes it possible that we're not going to be prosecuted for our thoughts is every line we go right to the fact that did trump or anyone from the trump campaign participate in the disimnation of hacked material? an

who knows better about any of this than perhaps hillary clinton.re as she argues. but i think the question here is how much will this presidential campaign interfere with all of this. because of course elizabeth warren is jumping out there, really ahead of any other presidential candidate, senator kamala harris is following close behind saying they do believe it is time for impeachment. but of course this is a function of the house. so i think one effect of this op-ed is to kind of cool tempers in the house and say, do your work, follow the mueller report and do more investigating. impeachment might be too easy. >> what do you think? >> i think that she's right in making the case. the choice right now is not impeachment or not impeachment. it is about whether or not it is time to initiate an inquiry and fact-finding about whether or not the impeachment decision needs to be made. that is obviously true. the information on the mueller report is more than enough. clinton notes are there serious gaps in the record and the factual record and gaps that i

we are going right back to hillary with lindsey graham today.hought of you when i read that. >> the russia hoax has been exposed for all to see and the witch hunt has ended. it will end formally tomorrow with no collusion or obstruction of justice and then the real investigation begins for conspiracy to leak unmasked names of reporters and classified information. james comey stealing government documents and leaking them. you have a whole group of people who lied to judges, concealing evidence, deceiving them. that is a wide variety of crimes and if people in the fbi and department of justice were using their positions of power for political reasons to abuse the legal process, those are crimes. >> sean: did they rig the hillary investigation?se >> oh, absolutely, they regret.e the doj rig fit and so did comey. >> sean: even peter strake and lisa page say, it's a circular firing squad. we have 53 more closed-door testimonies we can get. did they also try to rig the 2016 election? with the phony dossier? >> yes. they were spreading this dossier al

speaker hillary clinton needs to be investigated.she needs to be in jail. you talk about sour grapes, this is a wilburn who has been rejected by the american people twice, rejected by her party inr primaries against crazy burning in 2016 to get the nomination. she is the last person who ought to be listened to about what ought to happen to donald trump. >> sean: exactly. it's called the constitutional republic, rule of law. equal application, equal justice. we are getting there. your heart be troubled. we'll never be the destroy-trump-media mob. jason chaffetz and for laura ingraham tonight. congressman, good to see you again. great job, great numbers last night. >> jason: thank you. it's an honor to do it, good to sit in for you on friday but laura, rest assured, she'll be back tomorrow. is that a warning or a promotio promotion? [laughter] this is my lap tonight. thanks, sean. again, i'm jason chaffetz. i'm in for laura ingraham. this is "the ingraham angle" from washington. a big show on chapter nine. steve scalise is here. he wil

hillary clinton and the cycle, you look at hillary clinton in 2008.lary in 2008, it was her is because it was supposed to be hers, senior leader, then along comes younger barack obama, more progressive. you look -- he was able to defeat hillary clinton much to l surprise. that is where i think the democratic party, as doug as indicated, the energy is over on the left. there is attention that people who are pragmatic wants to beat donald trump. what is joe biden's constituency? bernie sanders have a powerful constituency of liberals and progressives. what does joe biden have? there is none of that. no institutional, and here joe biden constituency other than remnants, memories, and that is what i meant about the old shoe. that won't last. >> mike: i want to say to both of you, you are two of my very favorite people. i love to watch you come alive to be around you because you ard thank you for joining us. >> thank you so much, governor. >> mike: the laws are put the marathon bomber behind bars are apparently unjust. that is apparently according to ocasi

that's right, no bleach pit, unlike hillary clinton. the president didn't destroy subpoenaed e-mails or any other evidence in this case. he did not invoke executive privilege. instead, according to independent counsel, ken starr, the president's cooperation in this case was unprecedented and that's because presumptuous had nothing to hide. thousands and thousands of documents were turned over, almost 1.4 million, unfettered access given to trump campaign, officials, administration employees. mueller's team completed 30 hours of interviews with the white house counsel. how does that happen? no executive privilege was used to hide anything in mueller's report. by contrast, the obama administration, they used executive privilege to withhold 20 e-mails from then attorney general eric holder surrounding his involvement in the fast and furious gun-running scandal. well, that was a real scandal. whereas trump, russia, collusion, was a farce. tonight, thankfully for the sake of this country, truth has prevailed. as the president's attorneys put

guy in hillary clinton's nightmares the f.b.i. found almost fifteen thousand and released e-mails into a year long investigation of her private server the head of the f.b.i. called you out for careless handling of classified documents said she believed the seaver confidential and some documents actually stood for the order of paragraphs some three years on when everyone thought it was all over and gone new f.b.i. documents reveal more juicy details like what happened to our half of the e-mails that were raised clean by the clinton team we're not talking just a few dozen or hundred or even a thousand e-mails here we're talking some thirty thousand all private according to clinton she did provide a detailed and meticulous explanation of how she picked which e-mails to delete how and who exactly wiped her server that potentially stored top state secrets except clinton did none of that instead she felt like joking about it. to do what the service well like with a cloth or something that i know you do but i don't know how it works digi

it is not verified, hillary paid for it and steele hate trump. fbi operatives meet with the trump advisors, paige, george papadopoulos secretly gathering information for the fbi. then on august 15th, again, 2016, before the election, strzok tax lisa page about a scenario where president trump gets elected, we cannot take that risk. and they speak of needing the insurance policy. september 2nd, 2016, page and strzok text that president obama wants to know everything we are doing. october 22nd, 2016, that's when the fbi obtained the fisa warrant to surveilled carter page, both of the application reviling the lean back revealing steele's dossier with lies paid by hillary, wow, a whole entry into the entire world of donald trump and his campaign. on october 1st, 2016, the fbi fires christopher steele for lying and leaking, december 15th, president trump is president-elect, obama intel officials accidentally "spy on p officials" obama national security adviser susan ross importing the names of bannon, kushner, and general flynn. 2017, comey briefing t

jim comey is the man who said hillary clinton was innocent even before he interviewed her.s the man at the center and one of the people at the center of the russian collusion. >> sean: i am telling everybody, there is an avalanche of evidence how to come out that is going to blow up this entire story. the biggest abuse of power scandal in our history. it exists, we have gone over it regularly. two separate determinations, the fbi done month investigation, house intel, and now the mueller report with no collusion. keep going after that and then the new green deal and how does that impact 2020? >> but the time 2020 rolls around i suspect the candidates will get smart. you'll notice they are not talking the same way that jerry nadler is. i thought it was interesting bernie sanders out of his way to say if we spent all her time attacking donald trump democrats will lose. you will see it economy between most of the candidates particularly wants to have the top of the heat and the people who are the chairs of these committees and the house because they have nothing. first of all

obstruction matters but only if it is trump, not hillary clinton. charges of rate serious sexual assault, only matters if appointed by trump but not the democratic lieutenant governor of virginia. a clear, violation of the espionage act, 18 u.s. 793, the law by hillary cleared because the investigation was rigged. why did james comey obstruct in writing exoneration with july? why did they take out gross negligence the legal standard and extreme carelessness? why did petrus trickle allow two people in the interview room when he was interviewing on juln july 5th? he written that mayor and what did bill clinton and loretta lynch talk about the secret meeting on the tarmac in phoenix before hillary was cleared? lynch, the fbi in concert together to clear the clintons? did they break that investigation obvious she committed felonies because she is the one to win 100,000,020? nothing but smelly walmart voters. and hillary clinton rigged and spying on the trump campaign to committing a fraud and pfizer abuse to unmasking american citizens of abusing powerf

guy in hillary clinton's nightmares the f.b.i. found almost fifteen thousand and released e-mails in two year long investigation of her private server the head of the f.b.i. called you out for careless handling of classified documents said she believed the c.v. for confidential in some documents actually stood for the order of paragraphs some three years on when everyone thought it was all over and gone new f.b.i. documents reveal more juicy details like what happened to our half of the e-mails that were raised clean by the clinton team we're not talking just a few dozen or hundred or even a thousand e-mails here we're talking some thirty thousand all private according to clinton she did provide a detailed and meticulous explanation of how she picked which e-mails to delete how and who exactly wiped her server that potentially stored top state secrets except clinton did none of that instead she felt like joking about it but it was the sort of like with a cloth or something that well no. i don't know how it works digitally at all.

steele, hillary clinton's guy. bob woodward said the other day -- he's trying to link the dossier to putin, not hillary! the dossier traces right back to hillary and her campaign with the dnc. >> martha: they paid for it, and that is much we know. i want to talk about a piece today, the former press secretary for bill clinton. he talked about going down the impeachment road, we don't need to go down the impeachment road because it is going to be good enough father as we move forward that the president will be under continued constant investigation. all of these subpoenas are out there. but here's what he said about you, rush. he said publicans today are the party of rush limbaugh, sean hannity, tucker carlson, a coalition in the face of every demographic trend in america will mean the long-term realignment of the federal government behind the democrats. what say you, sir? >> rush: i'm honored they think this. some days i'm just an entertainer. some days i'm a has-been. now i'm the face of and the reason for the rep

that brings to you richard, hillary has to run in 2020, this is just too good. she condition sit on the sideline -- shy can't sit on the sideline. >> i don't think that secretary clinton will be running in 2020, she will be a private citizen, probably write another book and take care of her grandchildren. to ned's point, there is an equal distribution of justice. >> kennedy: there is, did you mean unequal. >> there is an unequal distribution of justice it happens of day to people of color across the country, that is fact, this idea, we could talk about hillary clinton all we' but this notion that mueller report is a slamdunk for president is not necessarily the truth. in the mueller -- the second half of the report he talked about 7 different instances we see president of united states trying attempts to commit obstruction of justice beyond that -- >> okay, i have a quick questi question. was robert mueller's team capable of handing out indictments? >> a justice department policy that you don't indict a sitting president of u.s. u.s., he talks about in the repor

after they gave a rigged investigation into hillary clinton. real crimes, espionage act, destroying subpoenaed emails. nobody ever heard of that bleach pit before, and nobody ever heard about hiring aides to bust up your iphones in your blackberries and rip out the sim cards. you did that? that would be called obstruction. from using informants on the campaign trail as well, abuse against carter page, spying on the trump campaign that way. using that dirty hillary clinton bought and paid for russian.ca, even "the new york times" is now saying no, it might have beenbr russian disinformation. he is saying that this needs to be examined. a little late. we have been doing this for over two years. l add that to the nearly increase. carried out by susan rice. oh, why would she be unmasking anybody? as we mentioned at the very center of all of this, you have, hillary clinton's dirty, phony, unverified bought and paid for russian lies, used as the basis for almost all of the spying operations. look at this letter from over a year ago. we know that pres

the most negative things about biden have come from hillary clinton and obama staffers. is it because you saw him upclose? >> i love joe biden -- >> i'm not talking about you. i'm saying privately. >> i think -- so candid, okay. >> shame on you. >> i actually think -- okay. so i wanted joe biden to get into the race in 2016 because i am probably the only hillary clinton staffer who did because i thought more competition would be good for her and i thought she would probably beat him. but if not, if he won, so be it. there is some -- you know, so there's a little about him, you know -- he wasn't always the most supportive from the sidelines. so you might -- that might be reflected in how the clinton staff feels. and obama staff, i was an obama staffer who worked great with the vice president and had a lot of respect for him and think he is a very good person at governing and very good person at politics. not everybody felt that way. >> all right. keeping it real. pushing back, keeping it real. >> this is super real. >>> after the break with, donal trump has come a long wa

than hillary clinton. >> the only reason that the obstruction of justice did not stick was that a lot of people around the president did not do what he asked him. mrs. conway: that is actually not a sophisticated legal analysis. i will tell you if the president asked me to break the law, i would walk out the door. i would not even take pictures of my kids off the wall. all i want to say is that for all of the conversation about what he did and did not ask somebody to do or he is mad about jeff sessions' recusal. jeff sessions was attorney general for 18 months after that. don mcgann was white house counsel for 18 months after that. the president has the right to fire any of us. he showed that by firing jim comey. he could have fired mueller. he did not do that. >> the report showed that people around him did not let him do that. mrs. conway: intent matters. intent should matter. intent has never mattered to any of you, respectfully. was there intent to collude or intent to conspire, was there an intent to steal the election from hillary clinton, i am sure for whom most of you voted. i

they are offering this country the evidence on behalf of hillary. the question now is where are all the people so worried about collusion? tonight the story surrounding ukraine gets even murkier because john john solomon breaking news right now new bombshell piece that details how the obama white house worked with ukraine to give the russian collusion narrative an early boost. joining us now to explain is the hill's john solomon. john, this is huge. >> yeah, it is. first instance obama white house very early as donald trump is rising early getting involved. what happened was the obama white house the national security council sill invited all ukraine authorities, the prosecutors, anticorruption investigators, held a meeting in january 2016, just before the beginning. primaries and said, listen, we would like to find some new way to reinvog rate an old case the party of reasons case. the case where there was money being paid to lob lobbyiss paul manafort and greg craig. could you help us get restarted. set in motion mad scramble in ukraine. ultimatel

it's very calming. >> it is. >> stephen: has it made playing hillary-- or a hillary, not the hillary-her? >> you know what strikes me, because this is set on the campaign trail, i don't know how people endure that. i-- i can't imagine how grueling that is to put yourself through a year and a half of that kind of pressure and-- and-- and being under the microscope every day, all day it seems like. i don't think---- it doesn't seem like people are built to do that. >> stephen: and you have to say the same message over and over-- even the best of them have to say want same message over and over again. >> and the number of selfies. it seems maddening to me. >> stephen: that's new, yeah. i respect anybody who tries to run for public office, even if i'm not on their side. i'm like good for you. somebody's got to run. i'm glat gladit's not me. and i've run twice. >> yes. >> stephen: yeah, yeah. >> i couldn't do it. >> stephen: no, neither could i. now, what's the-- what's the-- i think you know i'm a huge fan of yours, as an actor, and i'm sure as a person fiknew you better. ( laughter ) but

but these were the two that talked about the insurance policy just in case hillary tloses. if she loses, we have got an insurance policy. well, that was the insurance policy.. now she lost and now they are trying to infiltrate the administration to -- really, it's a coup. it's spying. it's hard to believe this is happening in in our country. i don't know if you rememberte a long time ago, very early on, i used the word "wiretap" i and i put it in quotes, meaning surveillance, spying, you can sort of say whatever if you want. that was a long time ago, and i have never seen anything like it a blow upug like you have never seen.ye now i understand why. because they thought two years ago when i said that just on a little bit of a hunch and a little bit ofh wisdom, maybe, they -- it blew up. because they thought maybe i was wise to them or they were caught.is and that's why. because if they weren't doing anything wrong, it would have just gotten by. nobody would have cared about it. it was pretty insignificant, i thought, when i said it, and that's pretty amazing. so you see now

i want to ask you specifically about the hillary clinton investigation.ongressman doug collins, we have the closed-door trust we will other people, bruce ohr, peter strzok and lisa page, now james baker, the general counsel who said the following, describedsc clinton's behavior as it relates to the server where she had top secret classified information on it as alarming and appalling and argued that he thought that she should be charged, and page and peter strzok said, both of them, they had no control over that investigation at all, although peter strzok himself that the tinterview, allowed two other people in the interview, which is unheard of, and was writing her exoneration in may before interviewing her in july. exonerating her three days later. comey did that part. do you believe that that investigation into hillary was a rigged investigation and showed it to a new? >> i don't know that because we didn't look at all that information. know howy that i don't destroying a server that should have been there in the first place was not obstruction justice

thank you for the report. >>> hillary clinton has new advice for divided democrats. stand by.'re in "the situation room." . i'd make it available in dozens... make that thousands of configurations. it would keep an eye on my fleet... ...and an eye out for danger. with active brake assist. if i built a van, i'd make it available in diesel and gas. introducing the all-new sprinter starting at $33,790. mercedes-benz. vans. born to run. if ywhen you brush or floss, you don't have to choose between healthy gums and strong teeth. complete protection from parodontax has 8 designed benefits for healthy gums and strong teeth. complete protection from parodontax. this is the averys trying the hottest new bistro. this is the averys. wait...and the hottest taqueria? and the hottest...what are those? oh, pierogis? and this is the averys wondering if eating out is eating into saving for their first home. this is jc... (team member) welcome to wells fargo, how may i help? (vo) who's here to help with a free financial health conversation, no strings attached. this is the averys with the suppo

perez or hillary clinton or abrams or gillem. >> >> by the way hillary clinton out with a new op-ed.ng really wrong happened, something did really happen it was wrong. but it wasn't on president trump. it was i think unfortunately for history of this nation on the intelligence community and members of the democratic party, as we look to 2020, getting really crowded. you have candidates getting further left, they want felons to vote, warren with free public college, millionaire socialist bernie sanders saying he wants average american donor to make bigger contributions, they are not contributing to his campaign, he thinks he is taxing everyone at 90%. socialism never worked, they are trying to hand out freebie, how does that play in peoria, as they say. >> bernie sanders is a socialist, he is disappointed what he does not get it take enough of your hard earned money, he will be really disappointed if he ever, god for forbid gets to office and bankrupts country with his socialist ideas, he run out of other people money very quickly with the green new deal that would require every singl

. >> we always knew harry hillary clinton was a lousy candidate, now we know she is a lousy lawyer, no basis for obstruction of justice. her hypocrisy, as you point out, is really breathtaking. she is the queen of obstruction of justice, destroying 33,000 emails and devices under subpoena. honestly, if you were smart, and she is not, to be sure, she would put a sock in it. because criticizing the attorney general, who holds potentially your fate in his hands, is really unwise. it's just plain stupid. william barr might decide, i'm not just going to investigate the fbi, now i'm going to investigate hillary clinton for obstruction of justice, reopen the email scandal, 110 different felonies, and i'm going to look into her role in selling uranium

hillary clinton has some ideas of what they could do with it. she charts a path for congress to follow, but does her voice help or hurt the situation? >>> and tonight, some of president trump's financial records are being handed over to new york's attorney general. will she find fuzzy math when she digs into documents about his loans? >>> plus, he spreads hateful messages, cozies up to white supremacists and demonizes immigrants, so how is congressman steve king suffering like jesus? the congressman made the comparison and we will take it up in the closing argument. what do you say? let's get after it. >>> so here's the question. is the president's refusal to admit that russia interfered, are his efforts to try to obstruct the russia probe all about protecting the legitimacy of his victory? now, this is that mr. mueller could not rule out as a motivating factor, and now we have news that the president may be putting his political security before your national security. and that could spell trouble for us and him. here's what we know. before niel

joining us now, the author of "the russian hoax: the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donald trump," boy, he has been right, fox news contributor and legal analyst, gregg jarrett but also, investigative reporter sara carter is with us. rush limbaugh said, we're going to play this in a minute, gregg, by every standard, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible. he even sent out hillary clinton as secretary of state, the state department employees, don't use your private devices or state department materials. she signs it. private server, classified, top-secret, information marked as such on her, on that secret server, we believe hacked by at least a six foreign intelligence agencies. that is the underlying crime. why did she delete 33,000 subpoenaed emails, bleach pit, and beat up the devices, pull out sim cards? that would be an intent of obstruction. meeting all of the criteria and

he was his best sidekick going after hillary. he doesn't like to talk about the fact that there was russian involvement in the election and the fact that wikileaks played a role in publicizing all that hacking stuff on the dnc. especially. what do you think he is afraid of if this guy comes to this country under extradition? >> it was a determination of our intelligence community united. julian assange was a partner in an operation with russian intelligence to publicize the same e-mails that constituted trump's closing argument in his 2016 election. this was not a random rally in the middle of primaries. this was what he was closing on in october of 2016. we know that russian intelligence found a way to get the e-mails to julian assange who published them to help elect donald trump president. if american justice officials are able to ask him questions, they could learn more about how and why that happened. >> david, i want to know who is nervous that assange is coming to america? i would think roger stone. one person is worried.

that's right, hillary's case. just like democrats, remember, they believed all the kavanaugh accusers. "i believe." their silence is deafening when it comes to lieutenant governor of virginia, oh, he's been accused of rape and violent sexual assault. where are all the "i believe er" charges of ceric's sexual assault only matters if e appointed by trump but not the f virginia. look at your screen. a clear violation of the espionage act, 18 usc 793. there is the law. why was hillary cleared? because the investigation was rigged. why did comey and peter strzok start writing and exoneration and may? they didn't interview here to july. why did they take out gross negligence, the legal standard, and replace it with extreme carelessness? why did peter strzok allow two other people in the interview room when he was interviewing clinton on july 2nd, 2016? comey exonerated her on july 5th. they had written my first and may. why did bill clinton on loretta lynch talk about on the secret meeting on the tarmac in phoenix just