i know you don't call eugenics the ongoing project belief in the perfectibility of humankind and humankind's ability to remove within our own species and, replace negative traits with positive traits, or to cut out negative. it sounds innocent enough, but in fact that was part and parcel of the national socialist, the nazi project of forcible sterilization and murder of targets whom the described as not worthy of passing on their genes. even if we're not sterilizing so-called undesirable populations, even we're not preventing the reproduction of groups, certain groups within, our human population. we're still talking about an attempt to engineer better human beings. when we talk about genetic engineering and that itself exposes and unfold the danger disrupting the evolution of our species. but let's turn back to start off here for a second. was he saying that science too dangerous to remain the very center of our lives? and how how are we supposed to feel about that given how science obviously so much of our daily realities. when we saw this in the context of the covid 19 pandemic, couldn't

., , ., humankind? i'm not sure that it does but there _ humankind? sure that it does but there is _ humankind? i'm not sure that it does but there is a _ humankind? i'm not sure that it does but there is a fair- humankind? i'm not sure that it does but there is a fair chance l does but there is a fair chance that it will have transformative effects. it is commonplace to compare it to the fire, or to the rise of industrial machinery starting on the 18th century, it remains to be seen whether it will be as important for our productivity and our lives, but we are already seeing some of the deep effects on how we organise our democracy, and inequality in modern nations. maybe you are not quite so sure about how dramatic its transformational impact will be but you certainly seem to be pretty sure you are sceptical. you say ai will fuel inequality disempower workers", choked democracy? how? bi disempower workers", choked democracy? how?— democracy? how? ai is a continuation _ democracy? how? ai is a continuation of _ democracy? how? ai is a continuation of

, the sanctity of humankind and love of humankind.other lie . ideology, which is another lie. most recently, we have been ianed most recently, we have been invited to fear so—called artificial intelligence aukus tool that might supplant us as a species. then there's the transhumanism that insists we're no longer purpose no longer fit for purpose anyway. carbon lifeforms, your time is up. make way for silicon. and so , as never silicon. and so, as never before, we must think about what it means to be human and choose whether we are for humankind, against humankind, or just ambivalent about our chances of continuing to exist at all. i said the thoughts that gave birth to the declaration of independence and the sentiments of the gettysburg address were ancient. by the time they were built into lower courses of built into the lower courses of the supports of the the masonry supports of the united of america. the united states of america. the american remains that just american dream remains that just a dream. while the stated aims of the

, the sanctity of humankind and love of humankind.other lie . ideology, which is another lie. most recently, we have been ianed most recently, we have been invited to fear so—called artificial intelligence aukus tool that might supplant us as a species. then there's the transhumanism that insists we're no longer purpose no longer fit for purpose anyway. carbon lifeforms, your time is up. make way for silicon. and so , as never silicon. and so, as never before, we must think about what it means to be human and choose whether we are for humankind, against humankind, or just ambivalent about our chances of continuing to exist at all. i said the thoughts that gave birth to the declaration of independence and the sentiments of the gettysburg address were ancient. by the time they were built into lower courses of built into the lower courses of the supports of the the masonry supports of the united of america. the united states of america. the american remains that just american dream remains that just a dream. while the stated aims of the

the ability to destroy humankind is evident. i don't know how it is going to be -- look at the internet. in the 90's, the internet was a wonderful thing and then the dark forces started working their way in and they take over in many ways. i'm not sure -- how do you see regulation going? what kinds of regulations are going to keep it cap on this and thank you for taking my question. host: answer the question. guest: i have heard the equivalence between the atom bomb and ai before and one way they are similar is they have big potential international implications. we can talk about the race between china and the u.s. and who is going to win the ai race. they are different in other ways. ai is a general-purpose technology. we all use this technology all the time. every time you use talk to text on your phone, it is using algorithms that fall under in many definitions ai. this technology is here, it is being used widespread. john is talking about existential risk and in many ways there is no clear path from the technologies that we

[chiwetel] but the water crisis, when it comes, will not affect all of humankind in the same way. this is helen and ray, the kind of people who until now have never really had to think about where their water came from. in normal times, their consumption is about 80 gallons a day. now its down to 13. and that's a life changer. we're not the same people that we were this time last year. -[helen] its not full. -[ray]no, babe. the idea that we could turn our taps on and there would be no water was real. [man] the officers are acting on a tip-off. local residents told them, employees at this body shop are washing cars with city water, and that is a criminal offense. i personally felt incredibly anxious. [aggressive screaming and shouting] [aggressive screaming and shouting] [woman] there have already been scuffles here. security guards now monitor the site. and there was this sudden madness that was going on. [everyone chanting] water for all or the city must fall. [woman] the local government s brought severe restrictions forcing people to look for alternative supplies. they ran out

i believe that our strategic partnership is important for welfare of the humankind, global species stability, and for all countries believing in democratic values. and this is more important than ever before. i'm confident that working together we'll be successful in enhancing the strength of the whole world. we talk about many such issues today and we'll add new dimensions to our strategic partnership. i once again express my heartfelt gratitude to you for your friendship. thank you, mr. president. thank you. reporter: mr. president, how is hunter feeling? [reporters talking simultaneously] >> thanks very much. thanks very much. >> right this way. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2023] >> live today, president joe biden and first lady jill biden welcome india's p.m., narendra modi, for an official state visit to washington. during the visit, prime minister modi will address a joint meeting of congress, beginning at 4:00 p.m. eastern, foll

to unravel the origin of humankind, set us on a particular, the typically post domestic, this astrology. i think a specimen is very close to the folk and the family tree on the may be one of the last before parenthesis separated from humans. and what so interesting in from dr. is that in the la with this go, we found both the oldest parenthesis and the oldest humans. so it really records the moment when the transition happened to find in those draw the piece. it gives us that lived well before the split up for parents for this long after that is quite interesting to mount pleasant. the most goals you have, the better. but i'm more interested in the blank page and the history books and the moments when the space is separate. those little moment recessive section. the breakdown knows he's witnessing an historical moment. one that many of his colleagues will envy him for the 3 don't say that we're touching our emphasis here . and the defendants, chrome dry is a time machine. the buckboard is missing one, a central element. what exactly was the difference between human and around trip? as c

:his no, already in humankind? and no, already has:— in humankind?d the small boat should be stopped andifs the small boat should be stopped and it's not a thing. it's and it's not a good thing. it's welcoming to lefties, basically. and i think it's offensive shoehorning your shoehorning jesus into your contemporary it's not contemporary causes. so it's not welcoming to me. i understand vbar—meaml welcoming to me. i understandi vbar—meam what they're saying. i mean, are rbey— what they're saying. i mean, are they-implying- what they're saying. i mean, are they-implying that- what they're saying. i mean, are they implying that jesus they kind of implying that jesus verba— they kind of implying that jesus veaba bave— they kind of implying that jesus would have been— they kind of implying that jesus would have been trafficked and evbbebree— would have been trafficked and evbbebree ae— would have been trafficked and exploited as part— would have been trafficked and exploited as part of the self—flagellating doctrine, the mvevvebe— self—flagellating doctr

millions of years and receiving the consequences of that too so what we're facing is a choice for humankind i hate to put it that way i don't want to sound grandiose i don't want to sound out of touch with anybody here i don't think i am, i hope i'm not but the reality is that we face some choices what's happening is happening for one reason that we can interpret it is a blanket of greenhouse gases principally methane and co2 but a few others that contains the heat and is creating this transformation the way we choose to heat our homes and propel our vehicles that power choice is the one we face now so the issue is i thought this was well raised this morning and your question how can we do this folks, we can't do it without the oil and gas industry. 15% of the earth's emissions that come from the burning of methane are attributable in the processes of the oil and gas industry and that is number three. if they were a nation they would be the third biggest emitter in the world so you have to get control of the process. i think something exciting is happening here. i have been impressed by the

you said, "from the time i get up and the time i go to sleep, i seek out the injustices done to humankindwant? >> peace! >> when do we want it? >> now! >> he was always like that. he was always, "let's do something." >> harry did this over and over and over and over again. >> he took all our struggles and made them his own. amy: the trailer for the documentary "sing your song" about the life of harry belafonte, who's died at the age of 96. the film premiered at the 2011 sundance film festival in park city, utah, where i interviewed harry. i asked him to talk about his first memories of being politically active. >> i'm not quite sure precisely when social and political activism became a visible brand of my dna, but it seems to me that i was born into it. it is hard to be born into the experience in the world of poverty and not develop some instinct for survival and resistance to those things that oppress you. my mother was a feisty lady. although she had never gotten into a place of formal education, she came here and had to learn skills, became a seamstress. she became an expert cook. she

:his no, already in humankind? and no, already has:— in humankind?ed and it's not a thing. it's and it's not a good thing. it's welcoming to lefties, basically. and i think it's offensive shoehorning your shoehorning jesus into your contemporary it's not contemporary causes. so it's not welcoming to me. i understand vbar—meaml welcoming to me. i understandi vbar—meam what they're saying. i mean, are rbey— what they're saying. i mean, are they-implying- what they're saying. i mean, are they-implying that- what they're saying. i mean, are they implying that jesus they kind of implying that jesus verba— they kind of implying that jesus veaba bave— they kind of implying that jesus would have been— they kind of implying that jesus would have been trafficked and evbbebree— would have been trafficked and evbbebree ae— would have been trafficked and exploited as part— would have been trafficked and exploited as part of the self—flagellating doctrine, the mvevvebe— self—flagellating doctrine, the new woke doctrine of the church 7 new woke doctrine of the chur

the ability to destroy humankind is evident. don't know how it is going to be -- look at the internet. in the 90's, the internet was a wonderful thing and then the dark forces started working their way in and they take over in many ways. i'm not sure -- how do you see regulation going? what kinds of regulations are going to keep it cap on this and thank you for taking my question. host: answer the question. guest: i have heard the equivalence between the atom bomb and ai before and one way they are similar is they have big potential international implications. we can talk about the race between china and the u.s. and who is going to win the ai race. they are different in other ways. ai is a general-purpose technology. we all use this technology all the time. every time you use talk to text on your phone, it is using algorithms that fall under in many definitions ai. this technology is here, it is being used widespread. john is talking about existential risk and in many ways there is no clear path from the technologies that we ha

intelligence, the supremacy of the algorithm, represents one of those transformational moments for humankind? i'm not sure that it does. but there is a fair chance that it will have transformative effects. it is all commonplace to compare it to the fire, or to the rise of industrial machinery starting in the 18th century, it remains to be seen whether it will be as important for our productivity and our lives, but we are already seeing some of its deep effects on how we organise our democracy, and inequality in modern nations. maybe you are not quite so sure about how dramatic its transformational impact will be, but you certainly seem to be pretty sure that you're sceptical. you say ai will fuel inequality, disempower workers, and, choke democracy? how? ai is a continuation of a trend that started perhaps around two years ago, where we have been using digital technologies, for changing how production is organised, who controls information and how we communicate. both digital technologies in general and ai have great promise, we can talk about some of the specific ways in which ai could be t

so humankind with covid style virlwe boffins. so humankind with covid style virlwe feel boffins.n kill us. it's got a choice. drone attack, enslave us somehow. vaccines, not . of course they're not vaccines. of course they're safe but a virus. safe and effective, but a virus. what think, louis? i what do you think, louis? i dndnn— what do you think, louis? i dndnn dndo— what do you think, louis? i think this is— what do you think, louis? i think this is just.- what do you think, louis? i think this is just. this- what do you think, louis? i think this is just. this is the typical story, which is panic building. want to building. they just want us to panic about something. and they tried about tried to get us to panic about the we did panic the covid. and we did panic about but don't about the covid. but i don't think are panic think people are going to panic as interesting, as much. but what's interesting, do this time around do you think this time around people will just when the next virus don't virus comes, you don't think people as as people will will be as as compliant ? i p

so humankind with covid style virlwe boffins. so humankind with covid style virlwe feel boffins. it's got a choice. drone attack, enslave us somehow. vaccines, not . of course they're not vaccines. of course they're safe but a virus. safe and effective, but a virus. what think, louis? i what do you think, louis? i dndnn— what do you think, louis? i dndnn dndo— what do you think, louis? i think this is— what do you think, louis? i think this is just.- what do you think, louis? i think this is just. this- what do you think, louis? i think this is just. this is the typical story, which is panic building. want to building. they just want us to panic about something. and they tried about tried to get us to panic about the we did panic the covid. and we did panic about but don't about the covid. but i don't think are panic think people are going to panic as interesting, as much. but what's interesting, do this time around do you think this time around people will just when the next virus don't virus comes, you don't think people as as people will will be as as compliant ? i personally

what we are facing is a choice for humankind. i hate to put it that way. i don't want to send grandiose, i don't want to sound highfalutin. i don't want to sound out of touch with anybody here. i don't think i am. i hope i am not. the reality is that we -- a set of human choices. what is happening is happening for one reason that we can interpret. it is the blanket of grain house gases, principally methane and co2, but a few others that contains the -- and is creating this transformation. the way we choose to heat our homes, and propel our vehicles. that power choice is the one we face now. i thought this issue was well raised this morning. your question, how can we do this with the? folks. we cannot talking it about without the orvil gas industry. 15% of the earth's initiatives that come from the burning of methane are attributable in the processes of the -- in this industry. that is number three. if i were, nation if they were a nation they would be the third biggest in the world. you have to get control of that process. i think something exciting is hap

more than anything, john, because, after all, this is one of the most important questions facing humankinde this virus came from. it is important notjust for those who've suffered through it, but at a country level as well, for national governments, not least china's, of course. it needs open discussion, open debate. that's exactly what our podcast has set out to do. you know, and there are a whole host of interesting questions attached to that more narrow one of where covid came from, about laboratory safety, about what we do about the illegal wildlife trade, that we all need to grapple with. john sudworth from new york. people of my generation and younger grew up believing that russia was at least the second most effective military force on earth, and maybe even the best. nato war games of the 1970s often used to end with soviet victories. after vladimir putin's so—called special military operation in ukraine, though, russia's armed forces seem pretty inadequate. if we're looking for historical parallels, the best one is probably stalin's invasion of finland — the so—called winter war of

risk of this type and i think that regulation is required and ii i think that the extermination of humankind is, is further down uh and is more related possibly to climate changed to a i thank you. and we'll come back to regulation. uh a little bit later. let me go over to unit if i may and as an it ethicist, what risks worry you the most. and do you see the balance between these and potential benefits as more negative or more positive you the most. and do you see the balance between i see it quite balanced because if you think about it a i is, is a basic technology that can be used for various purposes. we're talking about pattern recognition mostly for, for various purposes. so it has lots of advantages, lots of disadvantages, of course, as well, depending on how it is used. and i think much of the debate is to a certain degree sri a bit of responsibility by a i as its natural force by focusing on these very long term detriments by what we should actually look at how a i is currently already being used and implemented and what the current threats are both in terms of bias and discriminatio

exploration and use of our spain shall be carried up for the benefit and interest of all of mankind all of humankind. so there is this kind of legal ideal uh, from, from the cold war era that, uh, the resources on offer out, an outer space should be made available to all of humanity. but whether that will actually become reality or not, seems somewhat dubious, given the, the way things are going and politically and economically. and it's as field. yeah . it still be i speaking about a, you know, the comics of all of it. i was curious to know whether the, these companies that are engaging in dfcs ration today or the property accounting for, for the potential costs and, and the risks and potential costs of rescue missions. for example, with the example of the recent case and, you know, are they, uh, also accounting for the environmental damage that comes with it. an adult that they will do. i mean, this will cost a huge amount of money and this risk you, um activity and, but i mean that's, that's always in the see if something gets lost, everybody is helping to find the drive. right. but um, of course

if anyone is going to bring down humankind, it's us. i'm not concerned with ai.t's only as bad as the people who designed it. we all know nothing takes on technology like good old-fashioned water and we are 80% water so we have a good shot. >> why does the ai become so human. is google palm. it's become so smart it can understand jokes and why they are funny? >> you think we'll be saved by poland spring? >> we don't have to worry about it. it will be somebody's equity hired nephew nepotism that pushes the wrong button and brings us all down. >> who will that be? >> trust me, it might in the i n the administration right now. tiktokers are become influencers and the main source of news. many of them can be bought. so they are bought to tell information that someone paid them to relay. your reaction? tyrus: this is why i support ai. ai will determine uselessness and worth. i many am pretty sure the influencers will be in big trouble. this is just as i said. the problem with social media is anybody is an expert. they don't need wisdom or boots on the ground. 52% of i

it's the largest development platform for humankind. it is with you all the time.es pervasive, which we believe it will, especially when you look at how the large models are very natural, you can converse with them, that will happen at the edge. that is how you should think about qualcomm. if ai is going to get scaled, you will see it running on all qualcomm devices come in your car, your phone, your pc and other machines and i think it is a great opportunity for us. >> the future is to democratize access to ai and qualcomm is going to make that happen, why are you not getting jensen level love [indiscernible] >> it's great for the semiconductor industry for anyone who has been on the forefront of computing, qualcomm probably used to be well-known as a communication company but what we do now is more conducted processing, not communication. as the models started to become very popular, they will be running at the edge and i expect that ai becomes an option on qualcomm. i will give you an example. there was stuff in the prior conversation where adams said something

i right in the people who died on titanic 111 years ago, those 1500 souls, they almost represent humankindme power of nature, the kind of forces that we are witnessing today that just crushed forces that we are witnessing today thatjust crushed that sub in an instant. so really, the titanic tragedy speaks to the human condition. d0 tragedy speaks to the human condition-— tragedy speaks to the human condition. ~ , ,, , condition. do you think these kinds of expeditions _ condition. do you think these kinds of expeditions or _ condition. do you think these kinds of expeditions or missions - condition. do you think these kinds of expeditions or missions now, . condition. do you think these kindsj of expeditions or missions now, we are talking about a need for a clear investigation, is there a case now that they should be stopped completely for tourists, for adventurers and just be left to researchers and experts, if at all? they should be suspended until the lessons are learned. if pieces of the submersible can be recovered, we can learn what the structural problems were, but i imagine that m

the lag might from, from dry the cradle of humankind. this is the only one we know we're still in place and it can be back dated then the civil difficult. and they told me static mindset foamed from drops, containing tiny amounts of uranium. is the time the uranium tends to let? the ratio of the 2 elements reveals the age of this down. this direct mind must be between 2 and 2300000 years, so the, the toners under the static might, must be owned. this proves that the fossils from the thomas below the static might also mold in 2000000 years old. the fact that indications that the child's jewel comes from the transition period from australia, pentecost to human animal control came office to come by, say, from dr. gives us exactly what we were missing, instruct fontaine, or you the connecting piece between or start looked at the coasts and how many instruct fontaine these layers have been lost due to erosion in chrome drive. they are still there. here we can bring together the links between all the stories from the cradle of human kind. then

what it does mean, though, is i think the challenges of mankind, of humankind are very similar.en: who will be the winners and losers? i know it is a simple question and maybe too simple, but i'm not necessarily by -- i'm not necessarily saying by nations but by industries. >> that is interesting. to me, it impacts all industries. we look at it more functionally than industry. say marketing, legal profession, plan operations -- you can keep going on and on. customer service. it's going to make a lot of -- it is going to be a revolution across lots of industries. is not going to be an evolutionary change but a revolutionary change. is data plug-ins are going to be much more benefited by this. there's much more work to do before they get fitted from this. stephen: who is leading on the national front right now? united states, chatgpt has the first mover advantage. china has some bought -- some bot with baidu. >> some of the foundational models have been built on humongous model data and that's where some of the organizations in the u.s. have an advantage, but i think openai is an

aren't we just ooiuoing— humankind.n these things can work without suisioy— these things can work without suisioy oni— these things can work without subsidy and with— these things can work without subsidy and with 100% reliability— subsidy and with 100% reliability and when we're self—sufficient, then you may iini— self—sufficient, then you may in o— self—sufficient, then you may in o iii— self—sufficient, then you may find a bit more— self—sufficient, then you may find a bit more enthusiasm for non— find a bit more enthusiasm for ion mo— find a bit more enthusiasm for ion mo ion— find a bit more enthusiasm for from me for the— find a bit more enthusiasm for from me for the moment. forgive my sooniioism— from me for the moment. forgive my scepticism and— from me for the moment. forgive my scepticism and thank you for coming— my scepticism and thank you for coming on— my scepticism and thank you for ooming on ino— my scepticism and thank you for coming on the show again. sean spoons— coming on the show again. sean spoons

so really these acts of humankindness from the sherpa people really do reflect their real selfless andon the mountain for the western climbers and they are often in the shadows of westerners. >> let me ask what it takes to get a climbing permit because we know that there is this flood of people going to everest, 12 have died, five still missing this season. are there any tests? could i just -- someone who never climbed a mountain of any sort, enter the lottery, luck up and head up the mountain, or do i have to prove that i am physically fit enough, capable of making it up? >> for many, many years there have been no -- there have been no tests. there have been no mesh masurem put in place where climbers have to check for lack of a better word. those conversations are now being had amongst the climbing community and actions and steps are starting to take place. whereby commercial outfitters will do checks with less experienced climbers to find out what climbs they may have done in the past and also some tests of their physical, level of physical fitness to see if they are healthy enough

so now, humankind can actually see galaxies being born.eautiful images, that we really are looking at our origins. >> we are looking at ourselves. >> absolutely, we're looking at ourselves. >> webb has inspired all, and taught us more about our infinitesimal space in the cosmos. >> one galaxy has a hundreds of billions of stars. and probably hundreds of billions of planets. >> wait, hold on. i need to process what you are saying. one galaxy has hundreds of billions of stars. >> upstart. >> and we are talking about hundreds of billions of galaxies? >> yes. >> possibly a trillion galaxies? >> yes. >> that's a number that's so hard to compute. >> it is, it's staggering >> straughn was inspired as a young girl growing up in arkansas, gazing up at the startled sky. now the images from the webb space telescope have been forced her deep belief, we are all in this together. >> this idea that the irony in our blood, and the calcium in our bones was literally forged inside of a star. it exploded billions of years ago as a supernova. we are connected

you just described represent the future existence of humankind around the world? i just never understood why wall street had such, so much animosity toward that. let's talk about what you are concerned about though. you say there is possibility of a maybe a head fake, nevertheless you're participating in this market right now? >> you have to participate because this could be the first leg of the new bull market. we're not there yet. i said to you many times, i know you probably agree, with the s&p above 4200, really pushing up against 4300, if we can stay in there, a lot of investors will look at that, we have not slipped back. we have the treasury will be issuing something like a trillion dollars worth of bills, notes, bonds maybe next quarter 1/2, two quarters, tremendous amount. if that doesn't knock the market down. s&p stays up here we'll see fomo buying like who knows. we'll see the market sky rocket. possibly a melt-up in. charles: we've seen that. the train leaving the station. going, whoo, whoo. everyone scoreries out of those foxholes. i have list than a

aren't we just fefwffng— humankind.tic environmentalist. when these things can work without ewfeffy— these things can work without ewfweffy enf— these things can work without subsidy and with— these things can work without subsidy and with 100% reliability— subsidy and with 100% reliability and when we're self—sufficient, then you may fne— self—sufficient, then you may find e— self—sufficient, then you may find e eff— self—sufficient, then you may find a bit more— self—sufficient, then you may find a bit more enthusiasm for fwen— find a bit more enthusiasm for fwen ne— find a bit more enthusiasm for fwen ne few— find a bit more enthusiasm for from me for the— find a bit more enthusiasm for from me for the moment. forgive my from me for the moment. forgive eny eeenffefen— from me for the moment. forgive my scepticism and— from me for the moment. forgive my scepticism and thank you for eenfng— my scepticism and thank you for eenfng en— my scepticism and thank you for eenfng en fne— my scepticism and thank you for coming o

but queer people have been around since the beginning of humankind and we are not going anywhere.onth, officials approved the city's first-ever policy for events like parades. it says come events cosponsored by the city must align with taylor's mission and vision, which means they will effectively be open to everyone. what do you think of a christmas parade in 2023 will look like? >> i think the city will have a christmas parade and will be inclusive of all groups. we would love for tama to be involved in that as well. laura: that may be wishful thinking. >> i would like to see a tama parade with biblical values. what the city does apart from that is their business. laura: denise rogers says what is happening in taylor and across texas is about more than parades. >> is really about eradicating an entire class of people. laura: and, she says, the rising ltd -- lgbtq efforts in red states across the country are being felt by lgbtq youth. >> they are feeling less supportive, feeling like there are less resources. we worry about that. the kind of help they are reaching out for, we hav

hnth.hold humankind. >> from? yup. a cup of wathrough. we are looking at whether out there that's going to stay really nice all the way through this forecast getting warm this weekend, though. see that. all right. we'll see you back here tomorrow for by. >> judge yodit: you said that she exploded on you and lost her temper, yelled at you, and tried to run you over with a scooter. >> [ laughs ] >> she told me, "you are lucky i didn't punch you in your face." >> announcer: "hot bench." judge rachel juarez. judge michael corriero. judge yodit tewolde. three judges. three opinions. three judges. three opinions. one verdict.

so of the enduring myths that you refer to is this idea that one of these origins is in humankind's turn to agriculture. and this comes up over and over and over again. and you know, can describe your response to that. and in particular, honestly, i'd like just complexity of even that idea i think you make you make the point of showing the difference between societies that used hose versus societies that use which i thought was fascinating can you talk about that myth and the various ways in which you can sort of pick it apart and look at it because does have a strong hold on the imagination it does. and in fact, i was just at a gender and science communication conference in spain the other week there was an anthropologist there who repeated this she said, well, it was with the rise of agriculture surely that women lost power because as this theory goes, that was when property emerged and agriculture is very labor intensive. so, you know, that would be when women retreated into the home and men took over and the evidence doesn't show anything, the sort, if anything. and agriculture or th

procreation is universal to the everything on everett and more so for -- earth and more so for humankindful we want to remain an advanced economy. just my two cents, folks, but it's something we should be paying attention to. and, plus, it's a great blessing anyway. liz claman, over to you. liz: yeah. a lot of people can't afford kids right now. that's part of the problem, this economy. charles, thank you. we have to show you the s&p right this second because, folks, it is within arm's reach of the exit doors from bear market territory. that brings it to the a gain of 19% right now as we look at what's going on. hit a bear market low on october 12th, entered the bear cave back on june 13th of 2022. right now the s&p 500 is up 66 points. now, to officially enter a new bull market, it needs to close session up 71 or more points. we had this discussion, wait, is it within spitting distance or striking denies? we went with arm's reach, okay? that's a little bit further than spitting distance. [laughter] all right, big rally with 59 minutes left to trade for the week. you've got to stay until th