but hunter thompson is an alcoholic. e, who for some reason wrote about what he is very good at.s funeral , i love him incredibly, but i love him not for that. that is, uh, to be honest, hunter thompson, uh or uh, and here is the naked breakfast, just here i rather, unfortunately, maybe even mold more countertoms, but these are such writers about the frenzy there some there, and there somewhere to run. there is something there all the time. there. actually. they are not about some kind of addiction experience and not about some kind of experience. that is, it is some. well, such, as it were, the novels of some burnt dude's clips. i mean, to be honest, hmm, as if i don’t want to say that, but i will say this is a meaningless book about nothing , it is russian literature. e. the beatniks influenced, the berouz influenced, we can say, well, here is our favorite, by the way, eduard and animinovich limonov. yes, with his eddie, he arrived absolutely in the seventies, in the freshest form he scooped up this russian with his, so to speak, literary consciousness, he scooped up this beatn

from transporting hunter thompson to las vegas, all they can say has been following in his footsteps.h, for american literature, probably yes, but we also know there is russian literature, english literature in russian literature, we know bulgakov's morphine, uh, in english literature. this is a de quincey novel. uh, another 1900 800 there are some tenth years of uh, that is, yes, if we say, like this chronologically, as it were, who was the first in this whole autofiction. uh, such is the literature about addiction, uh, then, probably, this is still a devenation, but speaking of the beatnik generation , speaking of bureaucracy, and his books and his style descriptions, then, of course, for modern literature for modern society. he probably really somehow managed to give it. yes, as it were, it became clear there, well, a huge mass of people, there his popularity testifies to this. and the writers of the beatniks, they generally, well, let's say, how they differ. that is why they are called beatniks. let's talk a little about this cultural context. well, we are talking about the end of

berouz, did he become a pioneer, but because we know that irwin welsh, uh, with transpotting hunter thompsonll can be said were after the beru went in his footsteps. well, for american literature, probably yes, but we also know there is russian literature, english literature in russian literature, we know bulgakov's morphine, uh, in english literature. this is a de quincey novel. uh, another 1,000 1,800. there are some tenth years, uh, that is, yes, to put it this way, chronologically, like, who was the first in this whole autofiction. uh, such is the literature about dependence, uh, then, probably, this is still a dequintion, but speaking of the generation of beatniks, speaking of berouz, and his books and his style of description, then, of course, for modern literature for modern society. he probably really somehow managed to give it. yes, as it were, that this has become, it is clear there, well, a huge mass of people, there is evidence of this popularity. and the beatnik writers in general, well, let's say, how they differ. that is why they are called beatniks. let's talk a little about