so i wanted to you appreciate the comments that supervisor avalos and i understand that not every member of the board of supervisors and not every member of the previous board of supervisors sproptd proposition g. everyone has a right to their opinions by the fact is unless my memory served 55 percent of the san franciscans supported prop g and put it into the charter and prop g is the law of the land and governors o governors those impasse in arbitration and one can agree or san diego but 2/3rd's of voters in san francisco passed in 2010 so i don't know see what the purpose is of the lapsing in the resolution that basic is criticizing prop g i'm not going to support the language i supported prop g and most important the voters did so i don't think it is proper to put the language effectively that we disagree with prop g and switching the current language it doesn't matter what order but in terms of the additional whereas clauses that supervisor avalos read i respect pious point of view i don't think they're appropriate for the resolution >> supervisor breed. >> thank you. i just wanted

but i want to clarify that i don't support adding the whereas clauses i have no problem flipping the two clauses >> supervisor avalos. >> okay. again, i don't support of the sickout i think it's irresponsible. but i those are people that work inform the city and county of san francisco and have one of the toughest city job and there's 0 black, brown and asian this is probably one of the ears places to fund the stable employment in the city and it's important we acknowledge not only, you know, the difficulty they have in facing putting money or food on the table and paying for the rent but some of the aggravations they might have in this work i want to propose a motion to accept those 3 whereas clauses and vote own the underlying resolution >> i believe i want to acknowledge the city attorney to the amendments flying motion mr. gibner. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. first, you should open for public comment when it is closed you should take a vote on the imperative finding which is the necessary prerequisite to asking and then vote on the single or two motions and the underlying amendments as amended >> superv

avalos. >> yeah. i don't need to be convinced for the line resolution and the amendment i've provided doesn't take a position on prop g it just states why the machining drivers are upset i don't know approve of the action it has put me in a great disadvantage although i got to ride my bike yesterday, i think this is the context we need to have that gives a sense of what's gone on and the operators might feel their disadvantages because of the fix mini measure that many of the people in the public while they voted for it didn't see the details. i'm still waiting on the amendments from my staff >> supervisor campos. >> thank you, mr. president i don't have a problem with the context. i speak as someone who opposed prop g and who had a counter proposal because i believeed that i still believe that the way in which prop g in terms of reforming mini it wasn't the right approach and would i want get to the result he actually think that those of us who opposed it have been proven right anyone that's happy with

i. avalos. >> i. >> there are ten is. >> could you read the in memoriams. >> for the late [inaudible] on behalf of president chiu for the late young casen shelton, for the late miss caroline elaine rodman; on behalf of supervisor tang, for the late shawn. >> i want to thank sf gov tv for streaming this televised meeting? with that, do we have anymore business? >> that concludes our business for the day. >> ladies and gentlemen, we are adjourned. through some of our regular programming. thanks for watching. it will inform holly lee with another list of activities my hope our ready for fun in the sun this week of june it's about the good times on friday june 13th and young museum it moved forward it's after hours. you'll experience an eclectic mix of dancing and art exhibition tours have you also wanted to juggle ripley's believable it or not is having a world juggling day just bring our rings or whatever you joulg a it's a great opportunity to jostle for the first time she started on without foundation over and over on riggingly san francisco auditorium the gpr golden gate fists on june 1

supervisor avalos? >> i would like a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendations on all of these items. >> okay, i will recommend to supervisor avalos and a second without objection? so moved. great, and then, i will start with item 8 because that seems to be the source for item six. and item number 8, we want to increase the not-to-exceed amount and i have a document here, the amount for the power revenue ponds from 111,326,843 to 112 million. and i am not sure, if there are other changes that are on here. and i don't believe that there are. and so, first we could take that motion for that increase? >> okay. >> and the amount? >> motion, we have a second. >> second we can take that without objection. >> okay, and then, on the related item on expenditures, item number appropriations item number 6, i have an amendment of the whole which has various changes on it and if he could walk us through any of these changes on item number six? >> sure. >> in the record? >> on item 6, this reflects the increases

i. avalos. >> i. >> there are ten is. >> could you read the in memoriams. >> for the late [inaudible] on behalf of president chiu for the late young casen shelton, for the late miss caroline elaine rodman; on behalf of supervisor tang, for the late shawn. >> i want to thank sf gov tv for streaming this televised meeting? with that, do we have anymore business? >> that concludes our business for the day. >> ladies and gentlemen, this and can we rise for the pledge of allegiance. and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. mr. president, i'd like to take roll. please do. commissioner hwang. commissioner turman. vice president marshall. president gloria's. sxhuch. supervisor tang. we have a quorum and with us are the police chief chief greg suhr >> welcome to the june 11, 2014, police commission without further ado,. >> think public comment of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission wi

i. avalos. >> i. >> there are ten is. >> could you read the in memoriams. >> for the late [inaudible] on behalf of president chiu for the late young casen shelton, for the late miss caroline elaine rodman; on behalf of supervisor tang, for the late shawn. >> i want to thank sf gov tv for streaming this televised meeting? with that, do we have anymore business? >> that concludes our business for the day. >> ladies and gentlemen, >> good morning. this meeting will come to order. welcome to the regular meeting of the transportation authority finance committee. i want to give a moment and recognize our talented folks at sfgovtv. thank you for broadcasting this meeting. could you please call item number one? >> roll call, commissioner chiu. absent. cohen. present. farrell absent. tang, present. commissioner wiener, present. we have quorum. well, let's see. what's next on the agenda. could you please call item number 2? >> next item is consent -- >> let's call 2 and 3 together. >> they comprise consent calendar. these are considered routine. the member of the committee or public objects, they

and then i believe supervisor avalos in his amended version would have 11 members. i understand the coalition may be okay with 11. either way, you know, i would be okay. i just -- you know, there are some advantages of including more. as you know when you have more it's harder to have a quorum. it's a disadvantage. whatever version we come up with in terms of a amendment, we're going to have a week -- i mean, i'd like to say this about in general, that there's a lot of amendments to amendments today. and we will be probably accepting them with the idea that we still have at least a week to really clean up everything and look at it much more carefully in terms of why it doesn't make -- a second chance to rethink whether this is the best way to do this or not. so, that's what the -- >> thank you. no, thank you for the clarification. i just have to say, you know, i think a 15-member council is fine. my main worry is quorum. i think that size of a body becomes unweildy and it will never be able to meet because it's hard to get that many folks in a room, you know, every t

i. avalos. >> i. >> there are ten is. >> could you read the in memoriams. >> for the late [inaudible] on behalf of president chiu for the late young casen shelton, for the late miss caroline elaine rodman; on behalf of supervisor tang, for the late shawn. >> i want to thank sf gov tv for streaming this televised meeting? with that, do we have anymore business? >> that concludes our business for the day. >> ladies and gentlemen, good the san francisco full board of supervisors luldz i'm supervisor wiener the chairman of committee we're joined by supervisor malia cowen a member of the committee and supervisor mar it is sitting in for supervisor kim i want to thank sfgovtv specifically jennifer lowe and charles madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices and are prohibited at this meeting. copies of any documents to be submitted to the clerk and the items acted upon will be on june agenda. madam clerk call items one and two together >> for the multiple revenue bonds for walker drive not to exceed to 25 million plus and the revenue bo

>> yes, i would actually suggest you adopt supervisor avalos first and [speaker not understood]. >> have a motion to adopt supervisor kim's amendments to the amendments i had circulated on behalf of supervisor avalos. >> thank you. >> is there a second? >> second. >> second. so, with no objection, motion passes. [gavel] >> and then i make a motion to adopt the amendments that i have circulated that include the amendments from supervisor kim. >> okay. >> sorry, i just have a point of clarification. i'll ask the city attorney perhaps. supervisor yee's amendments incorporate all of the me you'rex in one. so, are we also going to -- >> let me clarify. it's a little confusing. if we pass supervisor avalos' amendments then -- and then we pass any amendments we have for peef, then i would make a motion to [speaker not understood] language that i have amended, put them for amendments. substitute with what was just passed so that we have -- issuing one document going through. >> thank you for that clarification. >> city attorney owen? >> i'll wait till you make the actual amendment. >> okay. so,

and then i believe supervisor avalos in his amended version would have 11 members. i understand the

and that you are referring to. >> okay. >> thank you. >> and just, if i could, supervisor avalos, what came out of also an audit that i and the mayor had called for, about sfgeneral and

and i am not sure on this, the list of that supervisor avalos that have been analyzed and i think that some of them have been and some of them have not. and so, i question, in case you have done this analysis, you could tell me whether you have done it. and so, reducing the pci, score, the average pci score, that the pavement condition in the index scores from the streets from 70 to 68 and which in real terms is cutting about ten million dollars a year out of road resurfacing, which is a one quarter of the proposed road resurfacing, budget. now, if i recall correctly on prop b, which was passed in 2011 actually contains the voter adoptive policy that we are to get to 70 pci scores, on our roads. and so, in terms, and i guess that i, i don't know if this is a, and a legal question, or maybe not. and in terms of what is the relevance of the fact that about 70 percent of the voters, voted to put 7 pci score, of 70, for our roads, and this will be a apparently adopting a policy that should be lower. and is that... does that have any relevance that voter adopted mandate or policy in whateve

good morning supervisor farrell and avalos i am the deputy planning director, and i am here to requesth supervisor authorization for smta, and to enter into agreement with the transport and security to implement the design and the advanced training for the central subway, and with the authorization of this contract, we will be allowed to have operatebility between the consist ans of the subway and the system and this contract will design and implement and install, and test, and inspect, and provide safety certification of the advanced training and in parallel of this contract and we currently have an existing major contract with the station, and it will install the infrastructure and support the elements for this work and one last thing, and the transport and security will also provide us with the assistance and the support for the safety certification for the public utility commission the system to provide the train speed, and breaking and also, head winds, and this system will allow for a safer and more reliable operation within the central subway, and this is also a fuel source cont

city with local residents this is one tool that does that and i urge our support. >> with that, why not take a roll call vote. >> supervisor avalos. supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor chiu. supervisor cowen. supervisor cowen on item 23. local hiring policy. supervisor farrell. supervisor kim. supervisor mar. supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. supervisor yee. there are 11 i's. the ordinance is passed on the first reading next item >> item 24 to administer the prevailing wages be on the assembling and disman and woman in connection with trade shows and exhibitions and others events on public property. >> supervisor wiener speaking of prevailing wage protective colleagues this legislation will help to have the workers in the setting up of light shows are paid living wages we want to make sure that people living in san francisco, california afford to be here. the legislation establishes a requirement that workers be paid for the setting up and taking down of trade shows and other similar events when the work is on city property it is clear and explicit that nonprofits and other community-based events are not included it

avalos. no. supervisor breed. no. supervisor wiener. supervisor farrell. there are 2 i's and 3 notice >> okay. the motion fails. >> supervisor avalos i have a motion to duplicate the file. and one file to shed all of the references to the puc budget. and to move so it will be all the departments operate from the puc that will be remaining and the a l s o the files of one and-2 and 4. to duplicate that file and one version will have all the references to the departments separate from the puc and all the puc references will be didacted and the remaining file i move to table. and i guess my question remaining is the file with the other vice presidents we ready to move that forward and if we are we've made our recommendations so i'll move that b my last part of the motion to move that file to join the rest in june >> second. >> and to our city attorney is that a clear motivate. >> that's clear supervisor avalos mentioned 2 and 4 you're talking about duplicating two and three and tabling 9 through 11 i understand. >> those are the supplementals. >> art table or continue that's our choice. >> i think

attorney our city attorney for being a great sturdy >> supervisor breed. >> one last thing i want to thank supervisor avalos for helping us stay the funding for clean power. thanks >> all right. and i do want to if i didn't do it earlier thanks supervisor avalos fewer leadership you do an amazing job on the budget committee are you have the most experience as american people aid and committee member thank you for your leadership it's been a pleasure. okay colleagues we have a number of motions to entertain our first motion to have the similarly ordinance items one and 20 reflect the changes as indicated in the summary for the 2014-2015 budgets. can we do it unanimously budget committee we'll take that without objection.. item 2 a motion to amend the annual salary upgrading the stipend assigned to hetch hetchy to pay for the costs for the employees who their limited to plastic bag one. the motion and a second can we take that without objection? so moved. okay i'd like to ask the mayors budget director to all the budget >> good evening supervisors through the chair kate howard we'll be submitting a series of

i want to see if there is any analysis that is behind it. mr. rose... >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, supervisor avalos, i don't believe that we have a recommended reduction in our report. and that you are referring to. >> okay.

i want to see if there is any analysis that is behind it. mr. rose... >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, supervisor avalos, i don't believe that

avalos. supervisor breed >> thank you. i want to start by thanking the budget committees it was great collaborating with you all but we went through a lot trying to make changes to address the challenges in our city in parking lot with the art it was great to see the spearheaded efforts for the arts we have at the data and support and now time for the action. i'm glad it this budget is competitive and it helps with some of the challenges we have citywide particularly in housing yet we looked at add backs as it relates to stabilization that are great city resources but i'm excited over the mayors budget as it relates to public housing. and i want to thank scott wiener for pushing the envelope on park proposal there's a lot of challenges there but we have a lot of resources necessary in order to help address the challenges that our parks face this is a comprehensive budget. i'm looking at to broadcasting those meetings or in the radio thank you supervisor mar for your leadership it was clear each member on this committee cares

thank you for your time and i hope you'll support in act on the november ballot >> that believe seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor avalos will you like to - >> yes. i want to pass those onto the colleagues and actually, the members of the whole supervisor campos to make. and this is the language for - . so i'll describe quickly again, the amendment we're making staefldz of having special elections to fill every vacancy in elected office in san francisco we're now going to be having special elections for the vokz vacancies in the mayor's office in the office of mayor and the board of supervisors and we're eliminating any language referencing the city college as well as the board of education so this is indirectly about the balance of important between the mayor's office and the board of supervisors. we have language that clarifies the number of days between the vacancy and the election between one hundred and 26 and one hundred and 80 days we have language from the department of elections to clarify in case there's an election with the one hundred and 81 days of a general election we're able to extend the time period if

and that you are referring to. >> okay. >> thank you. >> and just, if i could, supervisor avalos, what came out of also an audit that i and the mayor had called for, about sfgeneral and the department of public health, about security services, at sfgeneral, and this comports with the results of that audit. and of the last several months. and so, that investment, one way or the other is going to be made, and it has been made, i think, faster by the collaboration of or between our departments and frankly, it is years overdue. >> thank you. >> okay. >> colleagues, any further discussion or questions, or comments? >> one thing that i would like to stress. we are pleased to see that in the upcoming budget that there is an academy class, i just presided over the one and only academy class for the deputy sheriffs and this department had not seen in five years, and so i know that it is, well spot lighted both for the police and fire, for their need of classes. but for the department of our size, and our strength to have only one class in five years, was stared from another class and so i want