a strong confidence between us i believe she says changed dramatically i believe so . it's it does today europe is to take in a very short time frame a major decision about what it stands for our. europe of twenty seven is used to europe between france germany italy spain it if you will as was or what will be a future of europe it's easy. question if we can see some parallel ities between what we hear from chieftains in european as well argue maceration susie's world and i believe that asia has a huge chains as well to elevate to build up something which is bringing more nations together as in up to now and very interesting developments not so much about give ocracy i believe this is something we should put aside for surgery and i believe if you are looking to a state is speedster says are countries who are developing in a certain sense and who have a parliament by today are coming from a long history which doesn't allow to to sing into categories of to countries and i believe set speaking standard reeses strong to an additional even menu fracturing could be a very goo

i believe that prop h. es not go as far to ensure that there is adequate training, adequate accountability and adequate data for the election. and there is adequate checks o on... what i mean by that, is i believe the standard would -- it is less than, less restrictive than the standards that the commission put forward. i also believe that prop h. is a perfect example of what not to do in the face of the doj recommendations. i specifically reference recommendation number 70 which basically says that the way that sfpd currently makes his policies and procedures is to protract it. it is to meyer at the red tape. the word i like to use as nimble. it is not nimble enough. it is not nimble enough and making sure that any new data, new evidence, new community perspectives that come to light will quickly, and efficiently, and adequately be put in to any policy that is agreed upon by all. thank you. >> supervisor safai: my question would be, have you attended any meeting is? and if so, how many over the last few yea

to develop these economies and i believe these will be the investment money. because i mean it's interesting you talk about it. because it turns a very interesting story and very interesting model but when we think of the eurasia speech everyone moralists things to what degree you know good alexina just china will eat. chain does indeed pretend to be leading since the famous speech by siege and been in divorce we feel to the viking left by the superpower on the other side of the atlantic but i would like to quickly come back to your question of trust and bring up one fact as an investor and part of the group of my professional people having our own crystal balls looking into the future having our models and allies in corporations companies how to preserve wealth and purchasing power for decades ahead investors do not. me evidently feel the same prices do not display a new gloom if you look at financial markets bond yields are very low equity valuations are very high so investors a hippie company say investing at record levels banks who are recently aware sort o

and so i believe c.c.c. is what we have to be aware of but i'm sure said that we have as well as germans were very strongly looking to see united states said we see that say something changing if it comes to see over all let me say excellent relationship which we always had between germany europe and the united states iran is a critical point yeah a very critical point and issue said the united states would take the addition decision against not without but against a european very clear orientation will be sweet somehow for cynics foreseeable future all right we've run out of time i hope you've enjoyed our panel here from the atlantic to the pacific creating a space for trust here at the st petersburg international economic forum thank you for being. good only to bring people together and i'm sure that these folks of the exceptional good to come in the field of play but also for the me for the fisa michel for russia the two showed that to organize a vote of. that . kids. can manning. read as you don't consum

that mission will i time do you believe. i was the lead is. when i open my eyes i saw myself lying down and. then i started out saying what's up with me what's up. i know that my legs go. about moment i started feeling people. let me see one more i did not know myself i was. because the pain was totally heavy for me. she told me that she would not only would they would she was going to find another way. to live. just last what she told me and she lived this this boy with me. tonight i was crying because i don't have anywhere to feed. i started taking care of this boy. that's was very very difficult for me when i was with my kids at school. so when i will find him it's big if you court decided to make up my mind to find. a way to you know to my. little girl and then i did. and that got me going. asked me. if you can't. say i said both thinking if you can see there you know then. you can. go to cuba gets one team back of your mind foresee where you left you also cannot feel you can for contravening achieve something or not thank you all very muc

the two develops economies and i believe these will be the investor money. because i mean it's interesting you're talking about it. because it sounds very interesting story but when we think of the eurasia space everyone moralists things here this chinese will eat. china does indeed pretend to be leading since the famous speech by sid in pin in divorce with a key feel to the viking left by the superpower on the other side of the atlantic but i would like to quickly come back to your question of trust and bring up one fact as an investor and part of the group of my professional people having our own crystal ball so looking into the future having our models and allies in corporations companies how to preserve wealth and purchasing power for decades ahead investors do not. feel the same cries is the new display a new gloom if you look at financial markets bond yields are very low equity valuations are very high so investors a happy company investing at record levels banks who are recently where sold off it don't know as. existing profession turning out the cente

and you so i believe c.c. says what we have to be aware of but i'm sure said that we have as well as germans are very strongly looking to see united states said we sees it say something changing if it comes to see over all let me say excellent relationship which we always had between germany europe and the united states iran is a critical point yeah a very critical point and see if you said the united states would take the addition decision against not without but against a european very clear orientation real be sweet somehow far cynic's foreseeable future all right we've run out of time i hope you've enjoyed our panel here from the atlantic to the pacific creating a space for trust here at the st petersburg international economic forum thank you for being. sick. was. was. going on in terms only and some of the incidentals on the job and. to move on to a full deal with a single bound on a song that equals on its own two thousand only consistency make that connection don't assume cause i don't need a new cylin

i believe to be counterproductive, damaging, and detrimental. perts here as well as in the west, a speech in 2005 in munich, when i was speaking about the ability to attribute x territorial nature to the legal names that are defined as a single state. in that case, the united states. many took offense with me in the united states and europe. but that is something i was warning people about. now it is flourishing. look at it. john: so here you are. [indiscernible] president putin: if we are attentive in our analysis of what is taking place and to respond on a timely basis, there would be fewer problems like that. we have been supporting everything that has been produced by the global community to convince the iranian counterparts to reach the well-known terms of agreements and you should commend them, they went through a lot of compromises, and they are very true to all of their commitments. very recently, i met with the head of the international atomic agency. a very reputable organization and a very respectful person who we all trust. yet ain, h

>> i believe we have not found an alternate location. >> okay. i really want to find an alternate location because if we're going to be recruiting teachers and i'll just say it again, that is like the most pitiful place for us to try to, you know, train our teachers. it's a total distraction, and i just don't think it really represents who we are, nor does it pay them any respect to come to a place where we're trying to provide them with professional development. >> noted. >> okay. thank you. and then -- and then, on page 29 on the instructional guidance, for central office, you have p.d. on antiracist teaching. so that central office or is that school sites? or what's central office's purpose? i mean -- yeah, so what's their role on the p.d. on the antiracist teaching. >> so it's both. it's for sites, but central office, we want to make sure that we've received antiracist teaching. >> and then who's selecting what that teaching -- what that p.d. is? >> you mean, who selects who receives it or what provides -- who provides it. >> yeah, who selects

staff to make the transition before -- between our administrations as smooth as possible because i believe that no matter who holds the office of mayor, as san franciscans, we will all have a vested interest in the next mayor's success, and i pledge my complete and full support to make that happen. the poe el dylan thomas said the following about our amazing city. he wouldn't think such as place as san francisco can exist. the wonderful sun light here,

and i believe truly in the french foreign policy which is based upon independence. i understand quite well there are things that really ties very closely with the united states specifically in as far as the foreign currency is concerned. and i, indeed, enjoy these close relationships. but there are certain topics where we do not see eye to eye with each other. we do not stick to the same position all of the time. there is also friendship because of history. but there are certain things as well we disagree with. for example, the climate. i wasn't able to convince president trump not to withdraw because he made this promise during his campaign. but i don't believe -- we tried to pull it together and in this sense i would like to extend my gratitude to china who immediately felt the need to act. and we were able to do it. in fact, we saw that nobody else gave up on this increment. and the speed of the process speaks for itself. so president trump simply lost out because he couldn't do anything in a sense that nobody followed him in what he was trying to do. so we need t

i just twanlt work to get done and i believe whether it's d.p.h. or h.r.c. that the work will be done. so, i tend to lean on the side of the project sponsor who's expressed a very strong desire that it go into h.r.c. and i'm prepared today to support her on her request for it to go to the h.r.c. it sounds like supervisor furor and supervisor yee are also leaning that way and it also sounds like supervisor stephanie may not have any hard feelings one way or the other. for me, it becomes an i believer use more of how many people do -- how many staff do we aloe indicate towards this new endeavor and i think the request is for three. i'm more comfortable in the area of two and i feel like two is being thoughtful with the staffing up. so, i wanted to just propose that. oh. and i'll recognize supervisor safai who i didn't realize was coming to talk on this topic. welcome. i see you on the roster. >> thank you, chair. we chaired this conversation the other day and there were folks there from the department of public health but the h.r.c. was able to come and not sta

i believe they do for example yesterday i ran a live stream on my facebook page answering questions of other users and it got a lot of views five hundred thousand six hundred thousand people watched it and that's how many people watch my life streams on average more or less sometimes a lot more than that that's why i believe this connection will stay alive you see our government is supported by the people we stay in power as long as our people have trust in us if we lose people's trust will lose power pretty quickly i firmly believe that no one has any business being in government if they have no support from the people it makes absolutely no sense to be in a position of power without people support it's absurd. mr person you know if i mails a question on a completely different topic now what are your impressions of your visit to the main host city of the twenty eighteen feet for world cup would. after it's been great tomorrow i'll attend the opening ceremony i'm sure it'll be a most interesting dynamic and memorable event today we watched the concert in moscow's red square it was most

i don't believe we worked on that campaign. >> okay. i have a note shared with me, from may 27, there's a note on argentina. decision-maker awaiting feedback. >> right. >> that suggest you provided an opposition campaign to someone in the market for buying one? >> maybe i pitched such a campaign. >> that was the purpose, that premise, it was an anti-campaign , other person interested in politics in argentina. >> that would be the appearance of that. yeah. >> was that a company to work in? >> before this question comes about, i have a copy of a note prepared and submitted to the decision-maker in argentina, it talked about the nature of your work. the management team advised the community -- intelligence community of russia. is that the case, you have formal intelligent security from russia that work there? >> no, that is absolutely not the case. can i look at this note? >> i am not able to share it. i'm happy to circle back to you on matt. -- on that. russia is included in that list of countries. russian nationals work for scl. >> no, as

by surprise you i would like to focus on free trade. we often to believe that or that i think got to stay with us for a while then we are shook it when we discover this song think i saw disappear pretty trade the sea would have to be at that no but in fact it is an hour of it but i think. thirty janaya there was clearly meaning to buy a years for goods that they covered thought of floats today you were a cop at the discovered that the global economy is a leaning forward to protect your accent bust. their us introduced to global of aesthetics the only imports over still as a rimini away in a better gaming. out of a south interest we got your point about free trade here in the me go to john pier because i think it's really important if we look at a greater eurasian. political and economic space obviously trade is going to be involved in that you think recent events again in iran is the eight hundred pound gorilla sitting in the corner is this sending a very strong message now that the europeans have to start reassert i mean looking towards it amy we it's a t

i believe it's important for the e.u. to make a rapid and appropriate response within the framework of the w.t. people who need to go we believe these tariffs are not consistent with w t a regulations. this is a but they put the word. tariffs is this how america treats its friends. so as we all know donald trump is a bargain or a deal maker and in that context or daniels are the europeans perhaps taking these terrorists too seriously is this actually just trumps opening bid in a poker game and might be but a i would say the especially the european commission that's responsible for trade policy in the e.u. is taking a very rational proportionate approach right now and it's obvious and they have to catch this early on that they need to be some counter measures but they're proportionate and now of course everyone is waiting on what will be the next step on the u.s. side but we also have to consider that this significant amount of opposition to further tariffs on cars autos auto parts and so on within the u.s. it would also b

i believe in the values. i'll advance those values. >> i think we celebrate our extraordinary diversity. we look at content of character. martin luther king was my childhood hero. i tried participate in his parade every year. this year i was wearing a john lennon shirt. you may think i am a dreamer. that's my dream. i faced bigotry. my family fasd bigotry. at the end of the year, look at throws qualities. that's what makes america the very best. >> i wanted to say i think that race and gender matter. we are doing better to elect people of diverse back grounds than electing we will. only one out of eight constitutional officers is a woman. we electricity eight every four years and we've only had a total of nine in california. when you elect more women, more are invested in education. families, seniors and health care. that's where we ought to be focusing right now. >> mr. cox, i'm quoting here, california has been branded as an anti-trump state but many around the country think california is disconnected from t

whenever you find the answer to your problem you will all have to find the answer to your problem and i believe that all of you know that i do not have the solution. no white man has a solution for your problem no single person has a solution because it has to come from within each of you and i believe that we've had this conversation more and more no i believe that you know that and i know you would like transportation every time. but there are many teams who practice that doubt polio all others and they find a way and inside yourself you can find it when i know you can i believe in you i believe in you knowing i have known you for a very long time when what is good all you know i'm to meet you too we started but using form floyd all the time. we got here what does it feel that you know well about yeah about that i wouldn't doubt it for you that's what. you don't have any life for. no. more total. sometimes you know think about what's important to me i'm not feeling. it and that's why sometimes i said. if it's on when the money's explode on me if i go it's better for me. because of. only my wi

i really believe, david, it is going to go very quickly. i really believe it is going to go fast. and it is a substantial arsenal. no question about it. i used to say maybe it is all talk, no action. but we have pretty good intelligence into that, although probably less there than any other country. you understand that maybe better than anybody in the room, probably less there than any other country. but we have enough intelligence to know what they have is very substantial. this is why, david, i always say this shouldn't have taken place so late into the process. wouldn't this have been better five years ago or 20 years ago or 15 years ago and we didn't have to worry about not having a successful meeting like today. and i still love my first interview with you, david. still have that interview actually. yeah, go ahead. thank you. >> a second summit with the chairman in pyongyang or -- >> we haven't set that up. we'll probably need another summit. we'll probably need or meeting, use a different term, but we'll probably need another one. i will say this, we're much further along tha

and i believe that all of you know that i do not have. no white man as for your problem no single person that listen because it has to come from within you and i believe the reason to some precision more and more no i believe that you and i know my friends every time. but there are many things to practice down polio all others and they find a way and inside yourself you can find a way i know you can i believe in you i believe in you you know i have known you for a very long time what is going. to need you to lose fat that is in form for a long time. we come here. about about what is out for get out for. you to have a good life before. you know. with a little. something to think about what you mean i'm not feeling too. soon as it was sometimes i said. if the main thing is that wendy may explode on me if i die it's bad stuff for me because of those i've gone. only my wife i'm a keith. if i was not having my wife and my kids that's all my shit up to must. never forget about everything. well everybody has them been different we. like. never m

and you so i believe c.c.c. is what we have to be aware of but i'm sure said that we have as well as germans who very strongly looking to see united states said we sees it say something changing if it comes to see over all let me say excellent relationship which we always had between germany europe and the united states iran is a critical point yeah a very critical point and issue said the united states would take the addition decision against not without but against a european very clear orientation will be sweet somehow forcing nakes foreseeable future all right we've run out of time i hope you've enjoyed our panel here from the atlantic to the pacific creating a space for trust here at the st petersburg international economic forum thank you for being. the legacy code these are the winners the legacy oil gods of the winners the legacy all central bankers are the winners innovation dynamism the constitution the bill of rights these are the losers this is of. course. the. kinda. commanding he. does she don't co

automotive and like that he did so he started up with something very much and with a minor thing i believe and now the europeans have to be really unified and they have to act have to speak with one voice and i think these talks will proceed and i think we will get to a very positive and ok i want to come back to a couple of those points that you made in just a moment but first looking at the big picture it was shortly after the last g. seven summit that took place in italy that donald trump announced that he was leaving the that the u.s. would be leaving the paris climate agreement many europeans see that together with these terrorists together with the us retreat from the iran treaty that it had signed up to as the us essentially turning its back on the entire international order that was established after the second world war do you see a risk of that and if so what do you see is the implications i see taken together there's a there's a very real risk of that happening you know the question that a lot of people are asking now is if america first or is it america only all of these moves

anymore some some even more extended export of more so there is an imbalance in this and balance i believe needs to be fixed so i think it was a very mild shock from the trumpet ministration to go on those tariffs and i think at i at i think we should now go into talks that was just like it's as you mentioned it a bit in a poker game i believe in the end we should go on maybe go back to t.v. ip and go back that it was a transatlantic trade agreement that in fact the u.s. yeah also walked away from slowly but maybe that's in the opportunity for the new talks maybe we should take out the investment part because that was like the europeans are very critical on that part and we should to only talk about trade but that would be a good start for a new negotiation we just heard referencing he doesn't think this could escalate into a full fledged trade war you did mention that possibility in your opening statement we have seen both the e.u. canada and mexico now announcing what are called counterbalancing measures that means additional targeted terrorists within the system but that definitely woul

and i believe congress needs to have a say each step of the way. and under a law passed on a bipartisan basis in 2003 which i actually was involved in crafting with senator john warner, the administration could do research on a low-yield weapon but could not develop or produce or deploy it without congressional authorization. this bill removes that restriction going forward and virtually all congressional input on these weapons and other potential weapons. given the policy ramifications of development and deployment of low-yield nuclear weapons and any type of nuclear weapon, i believe that congress should be involved every step of the way. and so we will be offering an amendment to ensure congressional oversight of this issue to continue the process which we are using today, which congress will actually debate and vote and consider the development and deployment of a new nuclear weapon. finally, this bill authorizes $638.2 billion in base funding for the department of defense and the department of energy and $68.5 billion in funding for overseas co

>> no, i do not believe so. when he said investigator or proper authorities, i assumed it was some sort of law enforcement. in my testimony, when i was asked to pick up an athlete and her mother from the airport because she was going to be meeting with the fbi the next day, that is where it stayed with me. >> your knowledge of any investigation, who may have performed that investigation, secondhand from the conversation you had with the gymnast on her mother. >> correct. i was not aware. i did not know about the private investigation, or even the name of the investigator until, well, in november of 2016. >> who was mr. penny's boss? >> i believe that would be the board of directors. >> and you had no communication with them? >> no. >> you have any understand of why usa gymnastics would've employed a nondisclosure agreement to silence gymnast? >> no, sir. in fact, i found out about that by reading it on the internet. >> you stated in your testimony that you would like to be a part of the solution that prevents the

whenever you find the answer to your problem you will all have to find the answer to your problem and i believe that all of you know that i do not have the solution. no white man has a solution for your problem no single person has a solution because it has to come from within each of you and i believe that we've had this conversation more and more no i believe that you know that and i know you would like transportation every time. but there are many teams who practice that doubt polio all others and they find a way and inside yourself you can find it when i know you can i believe in you i believe in you you know like i have known you for a very long time when what is good all you know i'm generally the truth you started but using form floyd all the time. we got here what does it feel that you know all about you know about that what is out for you that's what. you don't have any life for. no. more total for. some days then i think about what's important to me i'm not feeling. it and that's why sometimes i said. if it's on when the money's explode on me if i go it's better for me. because of. on

erother and i believe tru answ, i believe you have reaffirmed an old faith. faith in a abiding universal truth that economic growth does not spring from the numbers and graphs and government bureaus, but from the hopes and aspirations of ordinary people. you have said that the key to the future is in a simple human face. not the face of someone famous. someone whose name is likely to appear in the history books. but of someone, a man or woman, excitement,a dream, a drive and he or she goes out and turns the dream into a business. sometimes, the dream is technologically sophisticated. sometimes it is as simple as the store on the corner. either way, this person is the driving force behind all growth. and because he or she can come from any part of society with an idea that will often seem eccentric until they are tested, we in government cannot help this individual. we can't effectively target money or other assistance. we can only keep out of his or her way. we can as you have, reduce taxes and regulations and open markets. we can give freedom. like you, we i

but i believe that is the case here. i believe that future will regard our work together as within of the great egacies -- as one of the great legacies of america to the world in half century. we don't always see eye it eye did?hat two irishmen ever so let me pause to say thank you or his vision, leadership and friendship to my colleague and bryan ime minister mulroney. [applause] president reagan: as i said are not intended to produce blockbuster announcements. us around thee of table a feel for what others are thinking. there a forum to raise issues or advance the feel ways in which together.ments work in economics at this summit we of nce the process coordinatoring policy -- policy.ting we examine structural reform a commodity clude price indicator in coordinating policy. commitment ewed our to acleaving progress in the uruguay round of trade negotiations. finally we agreed to work together to ease the debt in the poorest countries of africa. turning from economics and we -west relations reaffirmed a common position o

i believe in universal health care. in a public health option to compete with private insurance companies. and expanding medicare to everyone over 55. and i believe medicare must be empowered to negotiate the price of drugs. california values senator dianne feinstein i'm jeff bleich. preventing violence has long been my cause. to negotiate the price of drugs. in the face of senseless violence, we need hope.

i am a strong believer of public process, and i am a strong believer that as commissioner melgar said earlier, these code of fliers that i got a number of years ago needs to be reduced, needs to be more accessible and clearly understandable, and code reform is something that i hear wide support for. however, i believe that in order to do it properly, we have to have a clear and enforceable code, and many of the things that are in front of me today, there's still too much ambiguity and too much contradiction, and it still needs work. i want to particularly jump on the most discussed topics that were mentioned here by the public as well as commissioners picking it up, and that is reducing the notification -- the public period to 20 days. i believe for all of the reasons that the public is really volunteering their time torn between holding their job or not being able to take work off requires 30 days and that should be holding for all processes. the fact that we do have internet, the fact that we do have more quickly available communication does not mean that you can attend to it more q

i don't believe that. whoever wrote that is wrong, there will be a point at w when you are 20% through, you cannot go back. i had an uncle who w a great professor for 40 years at m.i.t. i used to discuss nuclear with him all the time. was a great expert, a great brilliant genius, dr. john trump at m.i.t. 40 years, the head of m.i.t. senta book on my uncle. we used to talk about nuclear. you are talking about a very complex subject. it is not like, oh, let's get rid of the nukes. it takes a period of time. the main period of time -- when you hit a certain poit is very hard to go back. >> how long will that take? pres. trump: it will take -- it will go ahead quickly. go ahead. >> thanks, mr. president. on the sanctions campaign you alluded that the chinese are not doing as great a job as securing the border as they were fo. you expressed doubts when kim went to see president xi jig, theoreign minister said there should not be sanctions whilgoatns are underway. the south koreans are talking about restoring som

i believe the representatives from the company's sa said that isn't to suggest the services to become a client but i don't want to mislead you. >> as far as you are aware of. i don't even recall. >> you were clear when asked about her involvement >> we were not undertaking any more. >> do you stand by those words as much now as you did then? >> i feel entirely vindicated. >> repeat what you indicated as you know they described the work anyou said you provided the concepts. what is the proof of the concept and what did you offer? >> why would he subscribe to work in this background? >> nigel ran a different company with different clients and had absolutely no involvement to what we were doing to the data personnel apart from my close personal relationship with him he could have been a stranger so he was speaking to the conjecture to what he read in the newspapers. asking questions about the integrity of that and as you know they would have evidence in the next couple of weeks. do you think that they would get a sign-up. >> that almost exactly reflected the details of myself and the det

>> sure, senator, but i believe that the first step has to be a meeting, right? and so we had that meeting and i think we should -- >> we have had meetings before. not directly. >> not meetings of this level. not meetings with the president. >> that's correct, but we have had high level meetings in the past and commitments in the past and we have never had a declaration -- we never really have had our eyes on exactly what they have and an understanding on how you dismantle it. >> i agree with you completely. and the way you formulated that. i think that after the meeting the president said that the meeting -- the summit in singapore wasn't designed to solve all issues all at once, but to be a starting point for serious negotiations and that's the next step are those serious negotiations to staestablish th modalities for what a complete verifiable and irreversible denuclearization means and how we are going to go about doing that. that's the work of the negotiating teams and the experts in denuclearization, of which we have many in the united states, scientific exp

but i believe there will be a greater role for online education. >> the former governor of -- is running purdue, what is the benefit of being a governor in that position? >> when i was a governor i had higher education in the budget. i was used to dealing with it from that level. the large public universities are complex organizations. have some similarities to running the state. you have to deal with the legislature, media, various constituencies. political with a small p. you have to have support for the institution and be out there cheering for it. it is a job with some similarities. >> host: some of the speakers auc berkeley, and shapiro, was that handled well by the university near view? >> guest: overall it was. i think the first appearance there were protesters, not primarily from the campus they had to be removed for their own safety. we learned a lot from that event. by the time ben shapiro and milo came a second time, we had better security plan and much more in hand. >> of those events where your own site to wanting to monitor closely? >> guest: i keep in close touch with the

i know a little bit about health care and i believe our health care system is an outstanding system. unparalleled throughout the world and i will stand with our hospitals and providers of health care on multiple levels and reflect the fact that we love serving our people and we are more than capable of serving our people. we reach out on a routine level trying to help them and their needs and i as a voluntary care clinic in provo serve the people for free in provo trying to help people and their health care needs. people have access. they can go to any emergency department throughout the country. and if there's regulation that needs to be done, it should be done in the state legislature because it's accountable and responsive to the people. i've seen that in the form of steve's bill where we've expanded primary care network and provided additional access for people that don't have the means to have access to insurance and i stand with the state legislature in accomplishing that. >> do either of you want to have a rebuttal? >> i think the comments the representative made are spot on. >

>> i believe so. >> signed by whom? >> i think it is 2002, bush. >> i think it was, a republican president, unlike the president's representation in his tweets. thank you mr. chairman. >> senator cornyn is not here, senator tillis. >> thank you for being here. i will get back to the topic is hearing was being held for on eb-5 program. in visits, 69% of sites you visited appeared to be in compliance with eb-5? >> correct. we are operating as expected. >> you said, of the remaining 31%, it did not mean they were not operating, that they were required to follow up review. you have a rough approximation yourat 31%, how many, instincts or data would suggest they are not in compliance? >> we have more information on that that we can get you on what the breakdown is, the types of things we saw, very quickly, the types of things we saw 431%, the business had been sold -- that we saw for 31%, the business appeared to be deserted -- those were the most egregious cases we saw. >> i am in the category of people that think we need re

i believe they do for example yesterday i ran a live stream on my facebook page answering questions of other users and it got a lot of views five hundred thousand six hundred thousand people watched it and that's how many people watch my life streams on average more or less sometimes a lot more than that that's why i believe this connection will stay alive you see our government is supported by the people we stay in power as long as our people have trust in us if we lose people's trust we'll lose power pretty quickly i firmly believe that no one has any business being in government if they have no support from the people it makes absolutely no sense to be in a position of power without people support it's absurd. nicol question the prime minister of thank you very much for the opportunity to talk to you both thank you. get a phone you know. what was the last digit you went on the internet no i am not using these village is it safe to say. are you sure there is no music ters there and they are all going to be sure the baby does a class of his that if that. person were gone and we though

i think obama tried so hard to do this meeting but i cannot believe trump got it. they were calling each other names. they were trash talking each other. i think it is a great move for the two countries. >> thank you for the call. pleading, news of his senior economic adviser the larry,r of the council, had a heart attack. he is at the medical center outside of washington dc. no word on his condition but the president pleading that out less than one hr ago. is joining us on the democrat line. call because it is a great first step. we do not want to see a nuclear war. like i said, he is not my guy but i commend him for what he is doing. the first up, but see where it goes. >> harrison is joining us from the independent line. what are your expectations for the summit underway? is one of the greatest accomplishments so far in the administration. it is crazy. three months ago, things were going down the toilet. place, isummit taking think there are endless possibilities for world peace settlement within the region. >> the president has left quebec. eveningsingapore sund

i believe it's a food fight but i think the mission. i pop you're going going. as a sport that relies on technique football would seem to be above doping scandals and yet it has been tainted by much rigging and. the corruption of the last. case we had was during nine hundred ninety four was the united states but i don't. in berlin a journalist conducted a lengthy investigation into doping in football because i did a large number of testimonies. from us before. that stefan much in august balkan. was the middle of a lot of the stuff and also the food water exactly at the first bush beatles milholland but you want to take this can only go to become a devout sport lol at the human that are not technically qualified got it in our third come after it for the terms of the quote if you got to admit it from someone that still in this class are talking. opinion football has taken much longer to be exposed. it was found that the german team were taking and thirty means during the one thousand nine hundred six well camp. you vent is unknown to you given their players blood

>> i believe i read about the letter, i don't believe i read the letter itself. >> i ask unanimous consent to enter that letter into the record. are you aware that the spike in the number of migrant children in u.s. custody today has gone to over 10,000 children in detention centers? >> no, i'm not aware of the number in detention centers. that may include children who have come across on their own. >> it does. >> i'm not aware of the number in detention centers. >> over 2700 children have been separated from their parents, including children as young as six months old. >> i do not know that for a fact, i'll accept your representation. >> i went to visit women in a prison, they're being held in a federal prison. i'm not exaggerating, when i say they're being imprisoned. asylum seekers who are being imprisoned. i don't believe that the administration knows even where these children are, who they belong to. >> i appreciate you raising that. i met the other day with secretary azar, and he was quite emphatic, that is a faults story, hhs does know exactly where every one of those children -- >>

he trusts me, i believe. i really do. he said openly and he said it to a couple of reporters that were with him that he knows that no other president ever could have done this. i mean no other -- he knows the presidents. he knows who we had in front of me. he said no other president could have done this. i think he trusts me and i trust him. >> ronald reagan said trust but verify. >> yeah. >> how do you verify this commitment? >> we'll be verifying and we'll be working with them and it's going to be much more open than it is right now. right now it's obviously very closed. it's a closed society. we know very little about -- you know, if you ask intelligence, they will tell you probably they know less about this area of the world than they do any place anywhere in the world. we're going to be working very closely with them. we've developed great relationships at different levels. mike pompeo's got really very good, strong relationships and others have also. today we introduced them to john bolton which was a very interesti

i believe you'll see some good action. i mean, as an example, one of the things with the missile set, you're probably surprised to hear that -- the missile site. but i believe that it's going to go quickly. i believe that it's going to go fast. and it is a very substantial arsenal, there's no question about it. i used to say maybe it's all talk and no action. but we have pretty good intelligence into that, although probably less there than any other country. you understand that maybe better than anybody in the room. probably less there than any other country. we have enough intelligence to know that what they have is substantial. this is why, david, i always say that this shouldn't have taken place so late into the process. we're -- wouldn't have this been better if it was five years ago or 20 years ago or 15 years ago, and we didn't have to worry about not having a successful meeting like today. and i still love my first interview with you, david. i still have that interview actually. yeah, go ahead. >> thank you. >> thank

>> i believe so. >> signed by whom? >> i think in 20 -- 2002, bush. >> i think it was, a republican president, unlike the president's representation in his tweets. thank you, mr. chairman. >> senator cornyn is not here, senator tillis. >> thank you for being here. i will get back to the topic is -- in this hearing was being held for on eb-5 program. you said, in visits, 69% of sites you visited appeared to be in compliance with eb-5? >> correct. we used the term, they were operating as expected. >> you said, of the remaining 31%, it did not mean they were not operating, but they required a follow-up review. you have a rough approximation of that 31%, how many, your instincts or data would suggest they are not in compliance? >> we have more information on that that we can get you on what the breakdown is, the types of things we saw, very quickly, the types of things that we saw for 31%, the business appeared to be deserted, or there was no evidence of construction. those were the most egregious cases we saw. >> i am in th

what i say and i believe my country can be better i believe in donald trump but i believe japan russia and america are going to be the three leaders that fight back against the globalist so that's my kind of part of my enthusiasm for putin here as well you mention the silencing of dissenting view yeah i totally hear your i personally have been looked into by a couple of times but i would at least agree with you that there is a political censorship or a liberal political censorship going on in a number of western countries but when i hear certain views again and postulating that children could be mistreated because of that names that's that's that's not that is not a fair summary of what i've said i don't let people know that it's not a fair summary of what i said i said i would invite certain children to my house if they know you know it's not me. i don't know when you are feeling rejected it feeling rejected is pretty painful for a child i can tell you from my own experience i'm pretty sure you have that experience yourself in your life so when you say that certain children are

i believe canada shares those concerns. n't understand the obsession with trade relations with canada. not only is the trade deficit small, the united states runs a surplus with canada. that's the biggest single purchaser of u.s. goods. this seems to be the wrong target. trump supports don't think the trade relationship is a problem. >> could it be it's so different from what we have with mexico and he can't get a deal between the three. maybe a bilateral is better. to do a new deal with canada you have to have mexico. >> i'm not in the position to negotiate a good trade relationship with mexico. when i was in office me and bush and obama had disagreements. pres trump made a great decision on that. >> you were strong on that. you got a lot of push back f thema team. >> that's fair enough. what we did do. what canadian prime ministers have done in the past. when we have them we keep them isolated to the issues with are disagreeing with. on other things like international security and trade and democracy and values we are on t

united states that would stay in the human rights council i believe human rights a text is a very important element in the un human rights is one of the pillars of united nations and i hope that. so little later sooner rather than later the us will be able to come back but as i said i strongly believe that in today's world we need multilateral responses and the american side they have both criticism and bias as their reasons for their walkout and the united nations security council certainly is not the only body to criticize either israel or the united states for that matter i wonder if you have any concerns at all whether that kind of pass then could be repeated and if the united states can pull out from the united nations altogether accessible i mean let's let's be clear the united states plays a very important role in it when i say it is a founding member like the russian a glacial carillon once again what is so weird also and of course is to be out of one or two areas that are more i would say the other thing is to be of course involved in the sensibility reaches of the when and i belie