one is the iaea iran track. the other is the so-called p5+1 and the iran track in which the iaea is also involved. these six countries china, france, germany russia, britain and the united states agreed when they joined -- on a joint plan of action with iran in 2013. the aim was to achieve a mutually agreed long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure iran's nuclear program would be exclusively peaceful. all seven countries asked the iaea to undertake monitoring and verification of military measures to be implemented by iran which we are doing. the p5+1 negotiations with iran are continuing. i should mention that iran is still not implementing their protocol. this is contrary to the resolution of the board of governors and the security council. the implementation of additional protocol by iran is essential for the agency to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in the country. the current status of affairs in fact iran's nuclear material under iaea safeg

it is also the intention of iaea to accelerate the process. i repeatedly said that this is not an endless process, and with cooperation we can -- we can clarify these issues within a reasonable time frame. >> let me jump in on this pmd issue. there are expert who is say that it's going to be very difficult to get iran to provide a full confession of both past activity, especially activities that were directly related to a nuclear weapons program, and so it should be sufficient simply to have confidence that those activities are not continuing today and that we have monitoring measures in place that would enable us to determine whether they have resumed in the future. what do you think about that approach? >> reasonable time frame. reasonable time line, you can have some image of doing some simple arithmetic. we have identified certain areas. we have the framework for cooperation and one step is normally for three months. if we take -- if we address three steps -- adjust every step, how long does it take? two step in one step? it's easy to fore

the iaea. years ago when i spoke to groups, or i briefed reporters, i would simply use the initials iaea. then i'd catch myself, and remember to sound out, you know, the full name of the agency. today you don't have to do that anymore. the iaea has practically become a household word. it's an indispensable effort. it's an indispensable player in international efforts to prevent -- prevent nuclear proliferation. its safeguard system, its highly sophisticated monitoring system, is an essential element for providing assurance that nuclear programs are truly peaceful. and for detecting possible violations of nonproliferation obligations. the agency has been at the center of compliance controversies, with north korea, iraq, libya, and syria. and now it's heavily involved in iran and the iranian nuclear issue. the agency has monitored iran's implementation of the nuclear elements of the november 2013 interim accord between the p5 plus 1 countries and iran, the so-called joint plan of action. and sinc

of thethe iaea is on top enrichment issue. question that is really going on in vienna in the next few weeks is, how much uranium will they be allowed to make? even at thenot table because everybody thinks they can do their job. and they will. they're very good. the second part is about finding facilities to build bombs and things like that. iaea is not capable of that. you need an intelligence network to do that, good analyst to do that. we have not seen any sign of this point that iaea's work is up to snuff. you are from the united states. what you see is the politics of the united states, though you live in vienna, the politics of the u.s. right now and their interests around iran? who is pushing iran policy? which countries? >> i find it hard. in the case of the u.s., you have this -- maybe the administration was to do one thing but congress wants to do another. i don't know who is pushing the politics because it is so fake. it is the same thing in iran itself. who is on the receiving end of the u.s. overtures does our over

so there's that iaea aspect x. in addition, there's the negotiation, the p5+1.that includes the p5, so u.s., u.k., france -- >> china. >> china, russia, thank you -- >> germany. >> and germany is the +1, and then the e.u. is at the negotiating table as well, so it's a big group of negotiators on our side. but their issues have to do with really trying to get a handle on these big, visible signs that iran may be heading toward a military program. i talked about enrichment capacity, trying to get the capacity shrunk way down looking at the heavy water reactor that the iranians had been building at iraq. what possible use for a big heavy water reactor than a big military program to produce nuclear weapons. so lots of questions of those times. frankly, it's not a negotiation i'm in charge of. it's been run by my counterpart, undersecretary of state for policy wendy sherman. she's now working with the deputy secretary, bill burns, and the secretary himself, secretary kerry was in vienna this week to wrestle with this negotiation. .. >> i'd like you to have the last w

they will not let the iaea u.n. inspectors in there.k at it, inspect it, see what's in there. at the same time the israelis say the iranians tested detonation devices that could only be used for nuclear weapons. what does that tell you when the iranians block the world from this? >> a key part of the agreement last year and of any final agreement which was supposed to be negotiated next month is that iran has to fully cooperate with the iaea and allow full access to nuclear facilities. well, parche' is where iran reportedly has been conducting explosive testing to develop nuclear warheads. facility that iran has not allowed the iaea to visit, and it's one of many questions outstanding that suggest that iran has a military program to develop nuclear weapons. >> pá do you think that iranians have to do in order to have the full confidence of the west when you got a situation such as parchen? >> well, the question here, erik, is that these faux are unsalvageable. we've given away so much. iran has given away nothing. basically we're moving

the iaea also appears to be helping with the fight against ebola. after the u.s. secretary of state spoke with the agency's director general, they said they discussed important work the iaea is doing to combat the spread of ebola, including through using nuclear technology the agency developed that cuts the diagnosis time for the disease by a significant amount. hopefully that's a promising development, as well. >>> it's just past 1:00 a.m. in the u.s. state of missouri, and the mischief in ferguson is denying reports that he's going to step down. take a listen to what he told our jason carroll in an exclusive interview. >> where does it stand? are you going to resign? >> no, i'm going to stay and see this through. >> pretty straightforward there. thomas jackson's department has faced angry protests and intense scrutiny since a white police shot unarmed african-american teenager michael brown in august. the u.s. justice department is investigating this, and the attorney general eric holder has called for what he said as wholesale change in the police department. b

the iaea slashed its forecast for global demand. >> give us a little bit of good news here. possibly business news related to shopping. >> retail sales fell to the lowest number since december, 2008. sales were down by 2.1%. total sales fell by 8% in the month of september. shoppers were reluctant to buy winter clothing. the luxury handbag maker saw even worse figures. his revenue for the first half of the year down 17% from a year earlier. the brand is trying to scale back and offer a more affordable line appealing to younger shoppers. shares plunged 20% on forecasting 20% lower figures for the year. and burberry saw its shares double -- tumble by 4%. the british brand is known for its handbag and raincoats. it cautioned that market conditions are becoming more difficult. >> apple is getting into the fashion link as well with this new watch. >> exactly, the smart watch that we saw debuted a few weeks ago it's now on the cover of vogue china for the month of november. you can see it there on a model with a red leather strap, which i think might be custom for this particular

what so ever, he does not want to give up sights, he businesses to reduce inspection regime by the iaea lou: which have now concludeed this may not be the iranian, force for tea peaceful purposes after all. >> after 20 years, he has come to that conclusion, amazing. lou: general thank you. >> good talking to you lou,. lou: general jack keane, only person to be charged in connection with 2012 benghazi terrorist attackst pleaded not guilty to 17 new charges relateed on that attack, ahmed abu khatallah saiding iing nothy during the hearing, facing charges that could result in the death penalty. we're coming right back. lou: midterms two weeks away, we're told that the republicans are going to win, and win big. >> real estate and publishing mogul mort zuckerman on what is wrong w w w w w (vo) rush hour around here starts at 6:30 a.m. - on the nose. but for me, it starts with the opening bell. and the rush i get, lasts way more than an hour. (announcer) at scottrade, we share your passion for trading. that's why we've built powerful technology to alert you to your next opportunity. because a

its members -- among its members several asian -- important asian partners, the membership of the iaea has been seeking to increase our engagement with other nonmember countries across as asia. one particular example that i would give in this context are the conversations about a new form of a nonmember affiliation between iea and some key partners including china and india. this is the idea still under development of an association relationship between those nonmembers and iea. this is motivated by our general sense, again, that the dynamism in the asian energy context is one that calls for significantly increased gaengagements. we are also working bilaterally with important partners all across asia. i will not, in view of time, go into details here. i will simply highlight three -- well, let's call it four in view of the prime minister's visit this week, four key asian relationships that matter deeply to the united states in the energy arena. one is with india, where earlier this week there was a series of announcements about new initiatives in the energy and climate space. a second

get in this context are the conversations about a new form of the nonmember affiliation between the iaeand some key partners including china and india. this is the idea is still under the development under an association relationship between the nonmembers and the iaea. this is motivated in the general sense again that the dynamism in the context is one that calls for significantly increased engagements. we are also working bilaterally with important partners all across asia. i will not go into details here. i will simply highlight three or let's call it for in the view of the visits this week, for asian relationships that matter deeply to the united states and the energy arena one is with india earlier this week there was a series of announcements about new initiatives in the energy and climate space. the second is with china. india claimed the summit occurs in about six weeks time it is reasonable to expect that again energy will be an important part of the conversation and and and is certainly in the bilateral meeting that the president will have we expect the same. japan has been for

let's go back last spring of 2013 when iaea, the energy agency said iran was pursuing with the nuclearram. the u.s. slapped a fourth round of sanctions on iran. it looked pretty bad and then rouhani got elected in this promise he was going to change the whole approach. the military going to take military or have i promised to take military action to prevent nuclear action if iran has nuclear weapons capability. if// the whole thing were to fal apart it would be safe to say there's unpalatable choices that's mar exoar complicated and he has far more on his plate than a year and-a-half ago. >> ifill: at least they are still talking. margaret warner in new york. thank you. >> my pleasure, gwen. >> woodruff: now, "those were the days," from the man who created "all in the family," "maud," "the jeffersons," and so much more on and off the tv screen. jeffrey brown has our look. >> brown: in my 90-plus years i've lived a multitude of lives, norman lear about a life including bombing emissions over europe in world war ii, the leading political advocacy organization. ♪ and the consideration of

when the iaea came out with its revision, all they did was mark down consumption by 0.2%.t was it. it's nothing. it's almost uncountable. this is a supply shock because we are producing a couple of million barrels of oil more than we used to in recent years. supply shocks are great. it's not a demand shock. people misread that. and maybe you and i are going to have to go -- we'll do a piece, we'll do supply curves and demand curves. >> yes. >> they are different. >> there is no doubt about it. and when we thought that crude was going lower strictly because of the strong dollar, then we could make an argument that on balance, that might be slightly negative for the big exporters. but we've gotten to a point where it doesn't seem like the dollar matters anymore. why can't we just enjoy the benefit and not worry about companies that are going to export? because it's not affecting them right now. >> two quick things, okay? because i've got to chime in here. all right? >> you must. >> number one, oil still ain't cheap. it was 44 bucks a barrel ten years ago. inflation adjusted,

the iaea has been cutting their forecast this year. more efficient, china is not growing as fast as it was. you still have a backdrop of quickly expanding supply and not quickly expanding. >> how is the drop in oil prices affecting the dynamic of getting oil out of the ground in unconventional means? at $75 come it would be bad for these more expensive drilling techniques, but what about $80? >> people come up with different estimates on where this magic number is that all of a sudden everything stops. the bottom line is, every dollar cheaper than oil gets is a dollar less cash flow for the company doing these. also you can see with how their stocks have been treated in the past, investor appetite is not what it was. so where do they get the money to keep on drilling at the pace that they were? >> a good question to leave us with. we will continue to watch the oil price fluctuations. "market >> live from bloomberg world headquarters in new york, this is "market makers" with erik schatzker and stephanie ruhle. >> rebound. a topsy-turvy

comes to something like federal grant requirements in title i or when it comes to questions about iaeatimes what we do is we create unhelpful framework and educator spend all their time trying to comply. i totally buy that educators are out there and this is what you hear. i was in mississippi yesterday. they're busy working on the implementation of common core but certainly for me and i think this is kind of a good-faith difference where i think we the people should be able to argue about it in a way that we haven't much is when i look back, and core standards, they are fine. they are not that different to be honest from what a lot of states have one paper at the time but there's also a lot of stuff that goes along with common core. some, gore advocates talk about how common core is actually smuggling and content because there's a 57 work little appendage they are that my good friends at fordham are very enthused about. .. >> how do we actually have deep commitment to doing it well, let them try and let others of us trying to stay on the sideline and see what it is actually works out.

yesterday the iaea for 2009 came down. downgraded oil demand to the lowest lows since 2009. let's not discount ebola f we saw something like this ten years ago, we saw a 30% decline in sars. we saw 20% decline in jet fuel prices because of the avian bird flu situation. demand is extremely weak right now. >> but you're still saying the price is too low, stephen? that's your point? you think it's overdone relative to where the price should be? am i hearing you sfligt. >> absolutely. absolutely. we're looking at a situation now where oil prices for most of the opec nations, saudi included, is now lower than they need to keep their books balanced. >> chris faulkner, want to get chris faulkner in here now. do you agree this move is overdone and do you think it could have further to fall? >> i think two weeks ago we talked about oil testing $85 then testing $80. both of those things occurred. i think there is a floor definitely at 80. but look, as a producer, where we're at today begins to scare me. they're tl are economical areas in the united states already at 8 aand below. the