to had a warning from the imf to that effect. you concerned that effect.ng the .. onto the consumer cost passed onto the consumer donald trump not being able and donald trump not being able to stick to his pledge to stick to his election pledge when it comes economy? h0 . president 2 . presidzenttrump h and getting and gettng the injlatjw and --ettin l - injlatjw and getting the under control the :-— is he cares about é is he cares about these reality/is he saresra, . - . but realityris he saresrabootethese - m— realityris he earesrabeetethese - but at the realityris he earesraboot these but at the same i he sees this as a think he sees this as a negotiating tool. many would t 7 president trump is a argue president trump is a fantastic_ argue president trump is a fantastic i think he sees this a negotiating and -% - and the prep % 7 7 and the prep would be what tool and the prep would be what with colombia. had a happens with colombia. had a situation — happens with colombia. had a situation the colombian situation with the colombian leader. _ situation wi

if you permit, my vision of what is at stake in the world according to the monetary fund, the imf. the size of your economy is beyond dispute. 1.4? yes. is enormous. no question. but economists reckon that to become fully developed, to use that phrase, i.e. let me put it to you differently. where has the developed country been defined? point one. i mean, i know of no definition in the multilateral system. development has to be all comprehensive. i think in many respects we are already better developed but i ask you the broad question, because you are a key extraordinary growth path that you outline, then in fact, they are going to dominate global energy markets to a very real extent. it's going to leave india very energy dependent on outside energy sources, is it not? not really. availability has been lacking and you have to resource from outside. japan being a case in point, but i won't go down that road. to be, pretty much 90% of your oil needs come from outside. but our domestic e&p or exploration and production, point one are biofuel blending. so 20% of all the fuel consumed at

escalate in terms of g5cglate57i5n terms of measures and back tit—for—tat measures and back what the imf world he show the rest of the world he intent on tariffs and a is intent on tariffs and a fourth to be reckoned with, other are also other governments are atso to act in a similar trying to act in a similar manner. it is all about messaging here and try to get othwerw w w othwerw to w w wwwwotwhwerw w 655 w wwwwotwhwerw w wtéiiaai w wi therother party to back down. i in terms of the economy think in terms of the economy trade relations, it does think in terms of the economy bode relations, it does think in terms of the economy bode well. ions, it does think in terms of the economy bode well. it'is, it does think in terms of the economy bode well. it could foes notjbodjeretljltcouthsignify in for a rockier period terms trade growth. good to w good to to you and really good to talk to you and have your reporting and insight as we wait for the from minister of canada. just following the break—in is that the mexican says ehae elie reassess erssieshf sees will ehae eee fisslfiéfi esssieshf se

imf, upgrading growth, predicted fastest-growing major economy in europe. wages up, inflation down.here is more to do. we are reforming planning and regulation, tilting the new homes we need, supporting a third runway at heathrow. and as she admitted in november there is no point in me complaining about labor. it is obvious that we conservatives lost the confidence of business. we are not taking lectures from them. >> mr. speaker, he doesn't want to talk about the employment bill because he doesn't know about it. last week he misled -- last week he misled the house. he was not on top of his own education bill. >> sorry, we cannot accuse the prime minister of leaving the house. no. we can't do it. >> mr. speaker, last week he claimed to have laid down an amendment he had not made. he doesn't know what is going on in here or out there. last week i spoke to a woman running a business in exeter. she is terrified of taking on new staff. she is struggling to keep her head above water, dreading what this government will do next. she is not alone. the federation of small businesses says 92%

kennan thought that, wrote this or the other thing about vietnam, about the imf missile deployment in the early 1980s. and, you know, i then working as i am now on the foreign relations of the united states series and i suppose to say my views in my own, not those of the government, but i kept thinking to myself at each of these moments, i know that paul nitze is intimately involved in these negotiations and that kennan is writing in a way the kind reinforces what i think a lot of critics of american foreign policy were already inclined to, and he wrote beautifully. i mean, really a great scholar, historian, but did actually change the policy. and that kind of got interested in in the end, his longevity and the kind of point i'm making the book is you know from roosevelt to the title from roosevelt to reagan paul nitze ackerman's white house tension to the most important matters of u.s. national security and defense, namely nuclear strategy and arms negotiations. and, you know, i tried to lay out in the book. well, how does he do it? how he stay relevant for all these years? and i thi

. - imf z: few years a-o ifew years a-o the impact modelled a few years ago the impact of a general fragmentationof tht kind of which thttf trade. of the kind of which these tariffs. _ trade. of the kind of which these tariffs, this trade might have to. they estimated led to. they estimated it could cost around $7 _ led to. they estimated it could cost around $7 trillion off the ;-;: economy. i think we can see that now _ economy. i think we can see that now about — economy. i think we can see that now. about of the global economy. now. about 7% of the global economy. compare _ now. about 7% of the global economy. compare that to the two big compare that to the size of two big economies, france and national economies, france and _ about— national economies, france and _ about the _ national economies, france and about the same size. the germany, about the same size. the equivalent— germany, about the same size. the equivalent of losing those massive economies from the global economy. aren't --oin to -o hopefully we aren't going to go but hopefully we aren't going to go - but we _ hopefully we are

lisa: something they talked about at the imf.eled through thailand, vietnam, three malaysia, through the philippines. we have seen that with increasing volumes of imports from those regions into the u.s. how much will that accelerate the more that tariff talk continues? sucharita: dennis short-term it will likely accelerate a lot. in the long-term the u.s. will have to figure out how to reduce some of that divergent. -- divergent. sion. doing a better job monitoring what is coming in. in this age of ai and camera vision and being able to automate more things there is really no excuse for not being able to better track what comes into the united states through the ports. yet there seems to be claims that it is incredibly onerous and difficult to do. i would probably allocate more funds to trying to figure out how to better monitor what is coming in versus some of the expenses we are already doing that are not necessarily the most effective use of some of our artificial intelligence solutions out there. lisa: we were talking about

he hasn't had a day off in two weeks because he is supporting the imf mission and is rated 70% disabled by the v.a. but refuses to let that stop him from doing his job to protect our country. and when my colleagues say that the average iq has vastly increased because we have let elon musk and his cronies enter our government buildings, i am offended on behalf of my constituents who are working tirelessly to ensure that our government programs are run to the best of their abilities to make sure that our country is safe in our neighbors are cared for. i believe in government accountability. i've represented the people of washington for six years in the state legislator where we have one of the most transparent budgeting operations and we have a aaa bond rating. we have good budgeting practices and good programs that invest in community. i believe that government can do both, can invest in our neighbors and be accountable. but we can't be accountable when we fire all of our inspector general's and take away that watchdog authority. our veterans have sacrificed so much for us and a 2024 rep