and he is to the attend a gridiron dinner where the jounlists dress up and sing songs impugning the president, and obviously a somber moment at the white house after this gun inflicted, self-inflicted gunshot wound is not going to

that i think would be worth suing on depending on how this shakes out, that doesn't fundamentally impugn the process or this people behind it. it's important and it's been proved important in the past and then resolved at various levels but the idea there are legitimate legal arguments and that those should be decided and meanwhile people should not, whether there outside the government or inside the government, they should not use those as an excuse to talk about this process as it's somehow fundamentally derailed. i happen to think that's true on a lot of fronts where there is an immense amount of litigation going on with respect to the current litigation but to speak about that responsibility and to ensure folks realize that at the end of the day this is the way to resolve things and what a court says is, i assume to be obeyed by those in government and it's probably worth reminding folks about that. >> can i just add a closing thought on that, most of the, a lot of the lawsuits in the past have been about the undercount. there's cities and states and governors and advocacy groups tha

in some ways, impugning aspects of it by suing on it. that has a lot to do with messaging around how litigation goes on. there are things that i think would be worth suing on depending on how this shakes out. that is not fundamentally impugned process or civil servant people behind it. it is important and has proven important in the past. areidea that there legitimate legal arguments and of those should be decided and in the meanwhile people should not use those as an excuse to talk about this process as if it is somehow fundamentally derailed. that stretch me as important and may be the questions you are asking. there was an amount of litigation going on with the --vious ministries and administration. folks realize at the end of the day that this is how we solve things. commanders at a closing just aton the -- can i a closing thought on that. a lot of the lawsuits in this past have been about the undercount. you have cities and states and governors and advocacy groups like the naacp suing to try and make sure before the census that the

and then there is the fact that the president has basically been waging war on them and impugning their integrity, imputing their honor and impugning their intelligence here, intelligence with a small i rather than capital i, not before he got in the white house. -- not since he took the office, but during the transition was when this war started out. you wonder why there is bad feeling. that is part of the reason, some of it is on substance. i see jeremy bash signalling at the camera. give me your comment because you have something to weigh in then i want to play in brennan. >> is it possible it was actually the president who told someone that he was, you know, congratulatory to putin? it's not just the note cards were leaked. it was the actual phone call. it would have to be somebody on the line. maybe there were other staff on the line. is it possible we're missing the big picture here? the president wants it known he congratulated putin? >> anything is possible in this administration. totally inconceivable in any other circumstance. in this circumstance not inconceivable. i want to

and he is to the attend a gridiron dinner where the jounlists dress up and sing songs impugning the president, and obviously a somber moment at the white house after this gun inflicted, self-inflicted gunshot wound is not going to derail his plans for the rest of the day. and president trump has been tweet iing since this took plac and though the focus is on trade and the media and not on the incident outside of the white house, fred. >> okay. boris sanchez, thank you so much. we will try again to go outside of the white house where ryan nobles is now. and so, ryan, give us an idea of what is happening there. >> yeah, fred. the law enforcement presence continues here outside of the white house after that person, the victim of the self-inflicted gunshot wound on the north lawn of the white house, and we are on pennsylvania avenue behind me, and you can see that the area in front to white house, and pennsylvania avenue normally open to pedestrian traffic and this is usually a busy thoroughfare on a sunny saturday in washington and this is filled with tourist, but it is completely shut down righ

meeting with officials from seoul at a banquet dinner kim jong un hosted the south korean voice impugned yang high level south korean delegations traveled north for two days of talks focused on the versing nuclear conflicts thousands of teachers have gone on a forty eight hour strike in argentina marching towards the country's ministry of education protesters want the government to give them more supplies more open new schools and raise salaries those are the headlines are back with more news here on al-jazeera after inside story. will she rule for life china's parliament is set to change the constitution so she jinping can be president as long as he wants the reason protecting the authority of the communist party but will that convince anyone in china or anywhere else this is inside story. hello and welcome to the program. the communist party has governed china for decades and president xi jinping could become the leader serving chinese people for years to come the two term limit on a president's rule is about to end china's national people's congress is expected to amend the constituti

and in some ways impugn it aspects of it by suing it. that has a lot to do with the messaging on how litigation goes on. there are things that i think would be worth suing on depending on how it shakes out and doesn't fundamentally impugn a process or the people behind it. it is important and proven important in the past and resolved at varying levels of our judiciary. there are legit meant legal arguments that should be decided and people outside of the government or inside of the government perhaps they should not use that as an excuse to talk about the process as if it is somehow fundamentally derailed. that strikes me as important and the heart of the question you're asking, i happen to think it is true on a lot of fronts. an immense amount of litigation going on with respect to the current administration and with respect to the previous administration, to speak about that responsible spli ensure that folks realize at the end of the day this is how to resolve things and what a court is assumed to be obeyed. that is worth reminding fo

hosted a banquet with the south korean envoys and met them at the ruling workers' party of course is impugned young high level seoul delegation has traveled north for two days of talks focused on the nuclear conflict and artwork from paris from paris is living museum on display in iran for the first time in a cultural exchange between the two countries to iran's national museum is housing more than fifty works of art for four months among the items on display with the rolls franks and paintings by dutch artists rembrandt based this month art from iran will be showcased in france in return. as i headlines let's get you back now to. luck. let. one. lucky lucky lucky lucky. lucky . the remains of rama's new coaches father and brothers were finally found a couple of years ago in a mass grave not far from nearby stepped in the. years after he began searching for his family he could finally lead them to rest. but there were more bones to be found and he continued scouring these words to help others also find closure. local government vehicles on all of these old folk will do of course work and. wil

. >> is she not trying to capitalize on this and to profit from impugning the president? >> i have to profess complete confusion over this entire case. why this is even a case. >> what do you think of her story? >> i don't believe it at all. no evidence to back it up other than very circumstantial. what she may not or may have told her friends at the time. in a deposition that never happened. the story doesn't deserve to be dignified by being displayed. >> sean: they dismissed claims against bill clinton. abc's former clinton threatened to end someone's career if they went public with bill clinton's affairs. >> it would not make it true. it's [bleep]. if you went on the radio and said bill clinton is the father of an illegitimate black child, people would think you are crazy. you would not work again. you would be interests embarrassed. people will think you are scum. >> sean: the point is the liberal press covered hillary clinton while throwing her husband's accusers under the bus. we'll have the videotape. >> the trio of women who said bill clinton made unwanted sexual

others who have received compensation in return for their silence, if stormy daniels can break with impugnity, perhaps they feel they can too. let me say that i don't know that there are other agreements. but it raises the possibility. and remember that michael cohen as recently as february 27th, was seeking to keep stormy daniels quiet through other means. the restraining order over arbitration that she did not know about. i think stormy daniels and her lawyer are playing the media game. that doesn't mean it's false. we don't know. why is michael cohen, maybe to jeff's point. why is michael cohen so dead set in making sure she doesn't tell her story? the restraining order and all these others. >> to switch gears, the white house is struggling to explain why the president has backed away from his earlier position torsion purchase certain rifles, you have to be 21 years old. >> it doesn't make sense that i have to wait until i'm 21 to get a handgun but 18 to get an ar 15. i'm curious what did you in your bill. >> we didn't address it. >> do you know why? you're afraid of the nra. >> he wants t

you don't want to impugn people's motives, but other than cowa cowardice, what would be the explanationhat? >> i don't know. the coral springs police department were getting the 911 calls. if you're in the city of park la land and you dial 911, it goes to coral springs dispatch. so all the live intel was going to the coral springs police officers. and the chronology that i have shows that coral springs and broward sheriff's officers simultaneously entered the structure and started clearing. >> do you think it's a little weird that the sheriff of broward county, now that we know that his department failed, is telling me that i need to surrender my gun rights. that's the lesson? >> i'm sorry. say that again. i'm sorry. >> why isn't the sheriff of broward county being held accountable for this? >> i can't answer that. there -- >>we talked to cathy. now some have decided we need to abolish all sexist language and make it a crime. she'll join us next with her view of that. stay tuned. ♪ no, please, please, oh! ♪ (shrieks in terror) (heavy breathing and snorting) no, no. the running of the bu

i disagree with him but i would not impugn his intentions.best pieces i ever read on gun owners and people activating for more gun control. when you look back at big public health issues like the war on smoking. why did that work? because everybody knew how to talk to a smoker. we had them in our families. the problem with this debate you have people in culture bubbles who talk about gun owners like we are cave men in a rambo motive. you know nothing about us and talking about us like you do is not advancing the ball one bit. >> martha: i think you are right in terms of people talking at each other that is not productive at all. there was a piece in the national review that claims as gun restrictions were lowered in recent years in the united states, the incidence of gun violence decreased in this country. they took a different tact in australia. they put in a lot more restrictions on weapons, and they also saw their numbers fall. you have different ways of going about it and you get the same result. yet, there is this idea that gun violence

. >> jesse: they have not been impugning the president's intellect for last year? they said he had alzheimer's. >> juan: i didn't say that. >> jesse: everybody in the press was saying he was mentally ill. if a mentally ill candidate beat the pants off of hillary. >> greg: pantsuits. elizabeth warren refusing to take a test that would prove she was native american. that's next. you do all this research on a perfect car, then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates. maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. switch and you could save $782 on home and auto insurance. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. you wouldn't feel good not knowing the price here. don't let it happen when you buy your diabetes test strips. with the accu-chek® guide simplepay program, you pay the same low price. all without having to go through insurance. plus, they come in a spill-resistant vial along with a free meter. s

it's regretable that in this particular area that they have chosen, i think an indefenseable and impugn tive approach and i hope they see it clear approach. this is also in the closed session, after this meeting so we'll have a chance to discuss it further. >> thank you, very much. >> thank you. >> all right. any public comments on this item? so with that we're going to enter closed session. item 18. can you talk about that? >> i'll read the closed session items and call for public comment. >> ok. >> item 18 litigation city and council tee of san francisco versus county of alameda. 19, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 20, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 21 existing grid laying pacific gas and electric. item 22, existing litigation, pacific gas and electric. 23 exiting litigation pacific gas and electric. and item 24, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric. >> do we have any public comments on items that will be heard during closed session? ok. >> we need a motion. >> i will move to assert. >> second. >> all in fav

what i will say is if you're going to impugn the integrity of the president, you may do so -- >> guys -- >> just say it, paris. >> has nothing to do with his presidency. that's all i'm saying. continue to rattle. >> no personal insults, please. let me just jump in. paris, here is a question for you. we are talking about the payment coming out days before the presidential election. let me flip it around. if this is hillary clinton, what would happen if hillary clinton's lawyer paid off an accuser days before the election? how do you think trump would react? fair question. >> i think on the issue of a payment, by the lawyer, i think he would have a reaction. absolute absolutely. >> and what kind of reaction do you think that would be? >> it would be negative. i'm certain it would be negative. i'm also saying that that is a separate issue from if she did something while she was a candidate or sitting secretary of state. that is what -- all i'm saying is let's separate apples from oranges. if we're going to talk about the payment and timing of that, that's fair. to bring up the allegation

i did not say all the students come i wasn't impugning their motives. a select group of extremists that were there who did say they wanted to get rid of guns. that was there. if you saw the signs, you would know that. plus the idea that you cannot challenge someone over their beliefs because they are a teenager is precisely the opposite of what education is about. >> juan: you have a picture about young lady and you dr. the picture, have her tearing up the constitution. >> greg: i didn't dr. any picture. you are completing me with someone else. >> kimberly: is a lot of controversy surrounding a parenting law in one state. your brain changes as you get older. but prevagen helps your brain with an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to improve short-term memory. prevagen. the name to remember. you tthey made a mistake.ompany the check they sent isn't enough to replace your totaled new car. the guy says they didn't make the mistake. you made the mistake. i beg your pardon? he says, you should have c

over which of the possible choices to reduce violence are actually going to be effective, without impugning the rights of law-abiding gun owners. how do we get the guns out of the hands of bad owners? and try to reduce these horrific levels of violence in city for chicago or washington, d.c., which has very sick -- strict gun control regimes. something is not working. patrick, what do you think the future for second amendment jurisprudence is? what you think the chances are first is federal courts parse out what might be reasonable regulation? i wholeheartedly agree we need to start talking about what is reasonable regulation. my theory is that we can't have that discussion as long as we interests or people dedicated to rebutting every argument that could be a reasonable regulation, trying to find some reason. if you argue, it's going to cost too much money, or it that's going to be too difficult to enforce, talking points have existed. this is been a century long debate about what is reasonable. it is not an honest discussion in many ways. i hope you read the book and see what the discussi

we saw how they impugned the characters of those people, the members of the tea party.e maligned conservative women. they ignore gay conservatives. they bash good people in fly-over nation that were good enough to vote for the clintons for how many year. and they turn around and vote for trump, those people are bigots and racists. we've watched media malign so many good americans and report one side of the story. look at everything that happened with parkland. where is the media focusing on the broward sheriff for fighting the "miami herald" who has done epic work in this story? they filed a lawsuit against the sheriff with the video. how about the media that has let the mental crisis spiral out of control? instead, they're writing about my musical likes and my appearance and my husband and law-abiding gun owners instead of doing due diligence and acting like the watch dog of the people. who watches the watchers? that's the question. >> tucker: if you're going to try to take people's guns away, don't you have a moral obligation to protect them from themselves? >> yeah,

therefore the investigation is impugned as you mentioned the mueller probe.his is a concentrated pr efforts rather than anything to do with facts. your answer? >> well, how about that guy from the white house that came out this week and-- the obama white house and says obama really didn't care about investigating the russia interference. there are so many loose ends to this thing. leland: i'm confused so you're saying that it was the obama administration's fault about not investigating russia interference, therefore it shouldn't be investigated now? >> no, i don't mind it being investigated now, i don't think he's found much for all the time and taxpayer money he's spent and i'm sure-- >> he hasn't found much interference or haven't found much, any links to the trump campaign? >> i don't see that he's found collusion. now, maybe he's got something he hasn't side and i don't think that he's found successful results for russia's effort to interfere. leland: so, but you think he's found interference. >> oh, yeah, sure. leland: and you said you wanted a purge of

but they say be quiet and allow david hog impugn the character of anyone who disagrees with him. that is not how adults is behaving. >> it is not fair to pull one comment. >> i am not. i am forced to take it seriously. poor david hog. his friends got kill would and my children would be upset. and i would be upset. the left is it forcing me to listen because it is it a lie to abide by? there ought to be a database and paired to the status of the mental health. and privacy laws should be amended. that hippa laws should be suspended and the american government keep the medical record the. no one supports that. >> i don't know what that is. >> to do so privacy laws should be a mended and the database of all guns sold in the united states should be paired with the gun owner's mental health and physical ability. >> if you were found to be mentally unstable by a judge that ought to be relevant. >> that is the law already as you upon. and it is on the form and fbi background check and i filled it out and so has everyone in the country. that exists. >> and i agree that there needs to be a

investigate the deaths of 14 individuals in the u., can and claims the russians have been acting with impugnityc raise someday important points. nikki haley gave some strong statements but she doesn't necessarily speak for the president or even the united states necessarily in terms of white house policy. europe had to be dragged to the table they had to take sanctions against the u.k. there is a case where this is scary. and the united states is not out of the realm of places where the russians could go after people here who threaten them. spies or individuals. the u.k. is an example of a place that we say that's scary. the first will be nikki haley today and the second is president trump today. let's start with nikki haley blaming the russians for the poisonings. >> we need russia to stop giving us so many reasons. >> it sounds to me like they believe it is russia and i would take that finding as fact. as soon as we get facts straight, if we agree with them, we will condemn russia or whoever it may be. >> so he says as soon as we get the facts straight if we agree with them, we'll condemn rus

we live with impugnity. we need to have a fund to train workers with a separate dispatch system you can call before you call the police. this lawsuit shows that the police -- after a long process of community cooperation to create use of force, they do not accept that policy. therefore, the police are assuming that the p.o.a., their leaders, do not care about them obeying the use of force policy. they are sending that message. so we are now -- the p.o.a. journal, by the way, i suggest that you read sometime on-line. it's fascinating. for example, jeff adaci, our public defender is called a bottom feeder. our member of the police commission, petra dejesus is called unbalanced. our own chief of police is being attacked. the p.o.a. has no respect for anyone but what they want to have power. this is not protection, this is not enforcement of the law. we want mental health workers funded. we do not need more police. let the ones that are there retire. we don't need them there anymore. we need the police to do the

about which debate of the possible choices to reduce gun violence may be effective without impugning the rights of law-abiding gun owners. how do we get the guns out of the hands of bad guys. reduce some of these horrific levels of violence in ,ities like chicago or d.c. which have strict gun control regimes in place. something is not working. you: patrick, last word to if you want to respond to what saidon -- to what brannon and what do you think the future of second amendment jurisprudence is. what do you think the chances of that are versus lettering the lower courts parse out what might be a reasonable regulation? patrick: i wholeheartedly agree that we need to start talking about what is a reasonable regulation. my fear is that we cannot have that discussion as long as we interests or people dedicated to rebutting every argument that could be a reasonable regulation and trying to find some reason it should not be passed. if it is a good regulation, you argue it will cost too much money or too difficult to enforce. this is been a century long debate about what is reasonable. it i

effect to profit from impugning the president?> i have to profess complete confusion over this entire case why this is even a case. >> sean: the media covering for bill clinton gets even worse in january of 19199, lisa myers taped the first exclusive interview with juanita broderick. i have the second interview with juanita broderick. back then "the washington post" reported instead of airing that interview right away, ntsb news president andy lack, other top executives sat on that interview for over a month. at the time, ntsb news claimed that they could not corroborate broderick's accusation so the interview did not air until february. now, while all of this was going on and ntsb was trying to bury the story. our colleague here at the fox news channel, brit hume and his panelists right here, they actually wore free lisa meyers buttons on air to encourage ntsb to run this interview. since they were sitting, of course, on a major news story. now that shows you just how far all these liberal networks will go to protect the clintons

conclude that jews because they're once victims of one of humanities greatest goodsal crimes are impugn -- genocidal crime, would reinforce -- perhaps the most dangerous of all attempts to broad then definition of anti-semitism to encompass clearly not anti-semitic only make it more difficult to recognize, isolate and oppose actual -- appears the legislation in congress has stalled, and maybe that its advocates will still get their way. la month, congress affirmed the appoint of ken inning marcus, an israel law fair strategist as head of the department of education's office for civil rights. over the office of democrats andsive rights organizations and attorneys, marcus will now be a position implement the state department's definition and continue his long -- decade long effort to suppress academic speech and campus activism critical of israel. so, to conclude, in the invitation alert we were asked cutoverrer some signs of hope. the first speech i want to says during the black he check my phone and i saw the news that benjamin netanyahu just questions today for five hours by the police

supervisors have a due diligence and responsibility to their citizens which has not been carried out with impugnity. as minimum, there should be a ballot measure so the citizens of san francisco can decide this issue. >> supervisor sheehy: thank you. >> thank you. >> supervisor sheehy: next speaker. >> hi. my name's john cameron. thank you for this opportunity today to give voice to those who very much need it. to trade money and commerce for the amount of intense cruelty inflicted upon millions of animals for their fur is simply wrong and unnecessary. when you were a kid, you may have seen someone hurting an animal and said to them, stop doing that. what if somebody did that to you? how would it make you feel? this would be hard to do because it's almost unconceivable for us to imagine the amount of suffering these animals endure from being raised in cages their whole lives, being trapped by your leg or face in a steel trap so someone can violently rip your skip from you while you're most likely still alive. and for what? money? apathy? cruelty? there is no reason, there's no way to humanely kill

the harassment suit against -- >> issue not trying to capitalize on this in effect to profit from impugning the president? >> i have to profess complete confusion over this entire case, why this is even case. >> what you think of her story? >> i don't believe it at all. anyone who waits 21 years to serve as a charge, has no evidence other than very circumstantial, what she may or may not have told her friends at the time, has a sword in the deposition that it never happen, and all of a sudden, comes forward with the story, it doesn't deserve to be dignified by being broadcast. >> sean: tell "the drudge" rept had to drop today about this 1998 op ed dismissed claims against clinton, writing, "publicly humiliating anyone for consensual adultery is draconian and wrong." i guess that is strange, too. abc's very own clinton sycophant george stephanopoulos once threatened to end a person's career if they dared to go public with clinton's affair allegations. take a look at this. >> i can send you names, addresses, phone numbers, a view had an affair with. it wouldn't make it true. it is completely

in fact, not only does the nunes memo fail to provide any actual evidence to impugn the russia investigationctually confirms a key detail. the fact that the investigation began not with page or the dossier, but with george papadopoulos, the trump campaign foreign policy adviser who has since pled guilty to lying to the fbi about his contacts with russians. and yet, today, nunes went on "fox & friends" to downplay that finding which came from his own memo. >> some say, well, what about papadopoulos? they started looking at him earlier. what do you say to that? >> well, i would say that if papadopoulos was such a major figure, why didn't you get a warrant on him? if papadopoulos was such a major figure, you had nothing on him, you know, the guy lied. as far as we can tell, papadopoulos never even knew who trump was -- you know, never even had met with the president. >> seth: yeah, as far as we know, trump never met papadopoulos. except there's an actual photo of the two of them at a meeting together and it's been around for months. are you really the chairman of the house intelligence committe

and he is to the attend a gridiron dinner where the jounlists dress up and sing songs impugning the presidentse after this gun inflicted,

what are the odds of a couple of those, i don't want to impugn anyone's integrity, bars sort of disappearing a big, heavy coat? >> i think it's possible. >> i'd sneak one. >> i would too. >> our next goes to the star of the week. the guy in an elsa costume who pushed a boston police truck out of the snow during a big nor easter up there. all this clip is missing is the song "let it go." he shows up at a bar dressed as elsa to make his friends laugh. little did he know he'd let the world go with him. he noticed a police vehicle struggling in the snow. he floated outside to stave day. shows great form, pulling up his dress, driving the legs, and pushing the truck to freedom as the crew stay warm inside the bar filming the historic act. he takes a well-earned bow before coming back to the bar where presumably he was taken care of for the rest of the night. the boston police released a statement saying the officers involved were especially gra grateful for the help and would like to thank the elsa impersonator for the assist. >> do we know why he was dressed up? >> he said to make his friends la

try to make the investigation go away by trying to hurt the fbi as much as possible, by trying to impugnem seem like they're evil and must be usurped. that's something that may be helping them with this investigation. but that has a lot implications for the independent rule of law in this country. so that's part of it. there's dam -- the obstruction of justice stuff, and the efforts to distract and hurt american institutions in the process is going to be something we have to repair as a country for generations to come. it's really damaging. the other issue is whether russia is getting what they want. if they did interfere in the election to help trump, i think what they wanted was relief from u.s. sanctions on russia and the trump administration is giving them that now while they are in office. and so if there was quid pro quo, the quo is happening and that's right now. >> seth: one last thing i want to ask you. there are, of course, things that are norms that are happening. one of the norms is there is a state of the union no matter who's president. >> yeah. >> seth: you covered that st

there are rheumers and we heard rumors for weeks in which this might impugn mccabe. but the larger question is this is the second time that we've seen someone from the fbi fired after a report from the fbi that, you know, obviously, referring to james comey. the last time this happened, there certainly was some question about the way in which it occurred. the fact that president trump has been so direct and so forward in criticizing andrew mccabe, clearly has been putting pressure on jeff sessions for a long time. the fact that this happened so shortly before this benchmark of when mccabe was going to be eligible for his pension, as noted by the president in december, there's a lot of questions about how this came about when it came about that i think clouds the issue of what it is that mccabe may have done. which will be answered once we see this inspector general's report which i think the sooner we can see that, the better for the president. >> you know, something else tom fuentes said last hour. he thinks one of president trump's perhaps bigger mistakes in all of

we saw how they disparage and impugn the characters of those people, members of the tea party. ignore, maligned black conservatives. they ignore and malign conservative women. they ignore and malign conservatives. they bash good people in flyover nation who are good enough to vote for the clintons for how many years but then when they turn around and they vote for donald trump, suddenly those people become bigots and racists. we have watched media malign so many good americans. they seem to only report one side of the story. for instance, look at everything that's happened with parkland. where is the media focusing on the broward sheriff for instance, fighting the "miami herald" who has done epic work. they have done amazing work in this story. they filed a lawsuit against the broward sheriff's office trying to get the video that the sheriff promised he was going to release. where is the focus on that? or the political class that's left on mental crisis spiral out of control. instead they are writing about myut musical tastes in "newswee" and focusing on my appearance and me as

effect to profit from impugning the president?> i have to profess complete confusion over this entire case why this is even a case. >> sean: the media covering for bill clinton gets even worse in january of 19199, lisa myers taped the first exclusive interview with juanita broderick. i have the second interview with juanita broderick. back then "the washington post" reported instead of airing that interview right away, ntsb news president andy lack, other top executives sat on that interview for over a month. at the time, ntsb news claimed that they could not corroborate broderick's accusation so the interview did not air until february. now, while all of this was going on and ntsb was trying to bury the story. our colleague here at the fox news channel, brit hume and his panelists right here, they actually wore free lisa meyers buttons on air to encourage ntsb to run this interview. since they were sitting, of course, on a major news story. now that shows you just how far all these liberal networks will go to protect the clintons

there is nobody on the hill saying mueller should be impugned. the more you respond to somebody like trump the more he muddys the waters, the more his responses come back at you. i don't think that's productive. >> let me tell you about in terms of the mccabe firing. he kept dim gent notes with the president after those meetings. president trump tweeted about the fact he never saw mccabe taking notes during his meetings with the president. what value are those memos going to have to the bob mueller investigation? >> well, it depends on the content of the memos. right. what we know comey did hrks emade contemhe made more contemporaneous notes right after a meeting in the littleo on the way back to fbi headquarters, or whatever they be, the more reliable they will be. the time and place matter. so if he did these memos right after these meetings, even if trump didn't see him, if he went back and immediately wrote a memo summarizing the events and put it into the fbi files, so it's time stamped, i think obviously it will depend on the content of wha

all the headlines say there is and you have no responsibility when you clearly at least are being impugned with responsibility with many who use you. chief operating officer sheryl hand berg to say how sorry they were, how they'll work night and day. but facebook, how many times did you hear arrogant to describe facebook and maybe they're not taking this kind of thing more seriously because they're just out of touch when the press calls something a scandal the company can't say it's not a scandal yet they seemed oblivious. i think that may have changed even today as they hired a forensic analyst a start, not enough. next silo, probably some others when one of its self-driving cars hit and killed a pedestrian now, any fatality is too many fatalities but from the very beginning of this experiment, everyone involved knew that we would still have them. the issue is not whether self-driving cars will have accidents, they will it's will they have fewer accidents than cars driven by humans so far the results are a resounding yes, but that's not what investors thought about today and, again, who c

i'm not sure impugning the motives of the other side is the way.e passed three substantive school safety and gun violence -- new laws in the past five weeks. i think we've gotten more done in five weeks than the last 15 years, but we did it by building on common beliefs and common ground. >> you said you didn't quite hear your daughter's voice. were you supportive of what happened yesterday? >> i loved the passion, i loved the attention that's being drawn to the issue. and so i commend all those that participated for coming together to try to find ways to get this to stop. what i think we need to do, though, is figure out what are the four, five, six, ten things we agree on, get those things done, and then we can have the debate about the more controversial aspects later. >> some said it was politically motivated about the funds? >> the march? >> that's right. >> i saw some politically partisan signs and issues. i don't know whether the march organizers were politically motivated. i don't know much about the march, to be honest. i spoke to the orga