inmarsat is doing this for reasons of transparency. when i got exclusive access to the inmarsat control room, to the scientists, to the engineers last week i met the man who was responsible for leading the team and coming up with the whole concept of the plane flying south. i asked mark dickinson, at the end of the day why was he so con kri vinced, what did this show? would it be possible to say where the plane went? >> to be clear, you're letting people make judgments on your work. you're not inviting them to redo your work. >> no. as i say, redo the work require experts in many different fields. we gathered those victims within the investigation team to allow that to happen. but this is providing some transparency in what data came back and forth between the plane and ground station and how that data has been subsequently used. it allows people to see what techniques, what things have been accounted for. but certainly provides i'm hope aggregate deal of transparency in ters of the analysis that's been done by inmarsat and almost by t

i'm not saying let's let inmarsat and malaysia off the hooks. they need to put the cards on the table. there's a host of information a lot of experts are thirsting for to figure out what happened. >> very quickly, peter, seems to make a lot of sense to me. do a test flight. >> right. miles is flight. we did that with twa-88 8twa-80. we can do it again. they did paper checks on six other flights. they look good. they need to be more open. this is 70 days. >> they certainly do. peter goelz, rene marsh, miles o'brien. thanks very much. we're going to continue to watch this story for our viewers. this is an important programming note. tonight "crossfire" won't be seen to we can continue to bring you several developing stories we're working here in "the situation room." we're keeping our eyes on the fires burning across the san diego area in california. thousands of people can't go home right now. just a little while ago, authorities said they've arrested one looter in the evacuated area. >>> up next, month in, month out. part of your electric bill i

inmarsat has it.nd malaysian authorities did not expressly object to inmarsat releasing the information. >> so you're saying whether malaysia has it or not isn't the point. inmarsat can release it. >> i say inmarsat now, if i'm their general counsel, i'm saying boys, you are now obligated to release the data. and they -- any argument that it's proprietary, that inmarsat has some ownership rights, some trade secrets in releasing this raw data is also gone because they said today the truth is it's not our data. so the bottom line is they are obligated in my judgment to release the data. the methodology is another issue. >> so miles, let me ask you about that. what would be holding them back at this point from releasing the raw data? >> well, unfortunately, you almost get the sense that they're stalling. >> yes, you do. >> there is something in there that they don't want the world to see. and that's the problem. that's why there is so little credibility right now about why this search zone has been ident

inmarsat says not so fast, malaysia.lite company says it gave malaysia all the relevant data and it's up to the malaysians to decide whether to release it publicly. >>> three of our top aviation analysts got into an explosive debate themselves on whether inmarsat was holding back information. >> and, i'm sorry, this whole thing is starting to sound a little childish to me frankly. but let me just tell you. i'm going to try to translate what i've gotten some mathematicians and what they are wanting. basically what they want are information on the algorithms which underlie all of this. the offsets, the margin of error on some of the distances traveled on the ground. it's incredibly complex stuff which goes to how they got to those numbers. and here's a key one. this is -- this one i think we can all understand. how does inmarsat know that the failures on board that aircraft do not in some way change the data. in other words, if all those communication systems were failing, how do they know that doesn't affect the way that

they will release what inmarsat had on mh-370. will tell us more accurately what the south conclusion is. but i don't think it will do that. >> stick with me. next, a new theory, the former prime minister of malaysia think that boeing taken cia are behind the disappearance. >>> and a new flight 370 movie is in the works and drawing strong reaction. woman: everyone in the nicu -- all the nurses wanted to watch him when he was there 118 days. everything that you thought was important to you changes in light of having a child that needs you every moment. i wouldn't trade him for the world. who matters most to you says the most about you. at massmutual we're owned by our policyowners, and they matter most to us. if you're caring for a child with special needs, our innovative special care program offers strategies that can help. >>> welcome back to our breaking news tonight. raw satellite data on flight 370 soon to be released. the families of the passengers waited nearly three months for any word on the fate of their loved ones. joini

inmarsat, the vice president of inmarsat is "outfront" to talk about it.w, there's a more enjoyable way to get your fiber. try phillips fiber good gummies. they're delicious, and an excellent source of fiber to help support regularity. wife: mmmm husband: these are good! marge: the tasty side of fiber. from phillips. narrator: these are the skater kid: whoa narrator: that got torture tested by teenagers and cried out for help. from the surprised designers. who came to the rescue with a brilliant fix male designer: i love it narrator: which created thousands of new customers for the tennis shoes that got torture tested by teenagers. the internet of everything is changing manufacturing. is your network ready? ♪ ♪ ♪ ben! well, that was close! you ain't lying! let quicken loans help you save your money. with a mortgage that's engineered to amaze! but when we put something in the ground, feed it, and care for it, don't we grow something more? we grow big celebrations, and personal victories. we grow new beginnings, and better endings. grand gestures, and perfec

the inmarsat data, tonight we are learning exactly what raw data inmarsat says it gave the malaysianovernment. this data is the holy grail pour the search for flight 370, because inmarsat's data is the reason the entire world is looking for the plane in the southern indian ocean. sources close to inmarsat are giving "outfront" details on the ray data, saying the raw data is just 14 numbers. this information has been included in the briefing given to the investigative team. also note the inmarsat analysis on the raw data has also been given in briefs to the investigative team in an electronic format. all right. so the interpretation is that not only they didn't just show the malaysians what they did, they have given them their analysis in an electronic format. here is the thing that may have you stunned, just 14 numbers. that's incredible. many were expecting reams of numbers and calculations. joining me miles o'brien, richard quest. let's begin with you, richard. you've been talking to your sources. you have more details what exactly the 14 numbers are. drum roll, please. >> right. t

they will release what inmarsat had on mh-370.hink it will tell us more accurately what the south conclusion is. but i don't think it will do that. >> stick with me. next, a new theory, the former prime minister of malaysia think that boeing taken cia are behind the disappearance. >>> and a new flight 370 movie is in the works and drawing strong reaction. that's why i got my surface. it's great for watching game film and drawing up plays. it's got onenote, so i can stay on top of my to-do list, which has been absolutely absurd since the big game. with skype, it's just really easy to stay in touch with the kids i work with. alright, russell you are good to go! alright, fellas. alright, russ. back to work! hey, i heard you guys can help me with frog protection? yeah, we help with fraud protection. we monitor every purchase every day and alert you if anything looks unusual. wow! you're really looking out for us. we are. and if there are unauthorized purchases on your discover card, you're never held responsible. just to be clear, you

can we trust inmarsat's analysis that it is in the southern ocean? and, you know, i think what ari piece really brings to the floor is if we don't trust them to carry out the correct analysis of the doppler ship can we trust them to reach a more fundamental conclusion it had to have turned up in the southern ocean because that requires a very sophisticated even more sophisticated kind of mathematics to rule out the northern path. >> ari, spu to a lot of scientists on this and experts on this. what do they think? if not the indian ocean where is their top theory this plane might be? >> well, they all have different interpretations, they have offered different theories. many of them say that with the data as it looks, you can't rule out a northern path over asia. i don't think any of those conclusions are warranted. i think the most we can say from this information is that we don't really know. we can't know much of anything from it and the point i've been trying to get across. when i've been talking to inmarsat authorities and asking them for informat

i want you to hear what the ceo of inmarsat told our own chris cuomo on "new day." earlier this morning. >> we have absolutely no problem putting our model in the public domain. that is a decision for the leading country to put out there. it's clearly information, materials and workings that we've contributed into the investigation. so the proper decision making around that lies with the malaysian government. >> you buy that, it's up to mallish sha to release everything so the family members will get peace in mind if the conclusions are accurate? >> it is up to the malaysian government. >> why don't they release it? >> that's a good question. i think they could. i just have the feeling they could release more volumes than the warren commission and it wouldn't satisfy everybody. i think at this point, there's just about nothing they can do. >> any legitimate reason why malaysia would not release that information? >> only that it would contribute to confusion. i can see them releasing the information, having a panel of experts sit there for four or five hours, answeri

it has been analyzed by inmarsat. this is the data used to determine where they think this plane went down. >> reporter: oh, not only that, and they are at pains again and again and again to say this -- this is not inmarsat on a frolic of its own. they gave this data to several other organizations. they won't say which ones. i believe them to be rolls royce, boeing, the ntsb, the aaib, and they will not confirm that. they gave this data to other organizations who then went away, made their own models, ran those models not just against mh-370 but against dozens of other planes that were in the air at the same time and against planes on previous flights, and they always got roughly the same results. so, what inmarsat is quite clearly and bluntly saying is, it's worked in all these cases. why on earth, nobody has shown why it's not working on this particular case. they have an extremely high level of confidence that they're right, that the plane flew south and that the flight ended in the southern indian ocean. >> all ri

the satellite involved is inmarsat 3-f1. one of 11 satellites in the inmarsat collection. it's in stationary orbit just over the indian ocean and it was to this satellite that mh-370 sent the signal, the so-called handshakes. leading the team here was mark dickinson. with his colleagues he dived deep into the data. >> three types of information we have. we have actually messages from the ground station to the plane and back again. that essentially tells you the terminal is twitched on, powered up and timing information. in addition to that, some frequency measurements. >> reporter: timing told them the distance within the plane and satellite enabling them to create the so-called arcs. >> the plane travels, to get to the next arc here. >> reporter: they then factored in frequency differences. the so-called doppler effect. dickinson's team concluded mh-370 had to have flown south. in the opposite direction. it was a startling conclusion. >> what did you think when you got the data and started the modeling, you're putting it in and you suddenly realize where this plane probab

data was analyzed by inmarsat.alked to people that did that, i'm familiar with them we've used satellite data for years. i think they've come up with something. i think they know it works and i have confidence in that. >> all right. thank you very much. >>> still to come, last week we told you about one of the largest beef recalls in history. tonight, because of our report, the department of agriculture is investigating. >>> and the nba, guess what, go to their website, because they are selling t-shirts inspired by donald sterling. you would pay them to buy that t-shirt, obviously. appropriate? >>> and a plane has just crashed into a home in colorado. we are live. ♪ ben! well, that was close! you ain't lying! let quicken loans help you save your money. mom has a headache! had a headache! but now, i& don't. excedrin is fast. in fact for some, relief starts in just 15 minutes. excedrin. headache. gone. ♪ hooking up the country whelping business run ♪ ♪ trains! they haul everything, safely and on time. ♪ tracks! they

according to the atlantic magazine, questions about inmarsat and whether it can be trusted.ere's acronyms but a lot of people are coming together saying, look, we don't buy the idea the satellite is pointing the way to the wreckage. in english, what are they saying? >> what this group of mathematical critics is saying is they think the other mathematicians are wrong. they believe this search down here by australia is fundamentally being pushed by misguided math, in some cases they believe the calculated speed of the plane may be wrong by more than 100 miles per hour. the analysis of the plane's direction may be terribly flawed, and that overall, too many assumptions are being made about what can be known from the real data onhand, and this is why. we've talked so much about this now famous arc that searchers have made reference to. it's based on the analysis of a handful of electronic handshakes between a plane and an inmarsat satellite high above the indian ocean. that's what produced this data about where it was headed. technicians then used those brief electronic signals

i asked inmarsat, could you be wrong? they said yes. they're prepared to consider they are wrong, but nobody's managed to prove on their data, using these numbers, that they are wrong. >> all right, richard quest. great to have you this morning. we'll check back in with you again. what people are doing now is going over this data, trying to understand if it is telling us anything more than we already knew. coming up, we'll go live to beijing where david mckenzie is following the family reaction to this data release. now that it's public what do they think and is it enough for them? stay with us for that. >>> now to nigeria, where a top official now says they think they know where hundreds of kidnapped girls are being held. the girls were abducted from a school over a month ago. so far, other than this video, there's been no sign of them. now with an international team, including americans, trying to track down these girls, nigeria's warning a rescue may not be possible. arwa damon live in abuja, nigeria. make sense of this for us. niger

inmarsat shared the conclusions that were reached by a panel of experts who analyzed that raw data. that's not the same as making the raw data public. family members in china have been the most vocal in their demands for complete transparency. they fear facts are being hidden from them. would it make any difference? australian search coordinator angus houston, again, told cnn this -- "no, i don't think so." there's been a lot of expertise surrounding their analysis, some of the best expertise in this field and they're satisfied the analysis withstands scrutiny." that's reassuring, but it won't make the controversy go away. jim clancy, cnn. >>> now the latest in the search for hundreds of kidnapped nigerian schoolgirls. officials painting a grim picture when it comes to the prospects of them being rescued, telling the senate foreign relations committee that the nigerian military is too afraid to engage their abductors from the boko haram terror group. vladimir duthiers is tracking developments live from abuja, nigeria. vlad, the message we are getting here in the united states from u

inmarsat, 11,000 aircraft in the skies. david coyley joins us now.an you explain to us exactly what the offer is? is it really going to change things, would it have prevented the kind of search we've seen for malaysia 370? >> it would certainly have helped the search process. because what we are talking about is providing a global framework for enhanced position reporting or flight tracking. so that we would have a better idea, more quickly, where aircraft are. >> so this is a technology you're offering. but does it require any participation of the airlines or aircraft builders? do they have to put on additional equipment or anything? >> no. the key point is, inmarsat has been providing safety services for over 20 years now and in recognition of that fact, we now have over 90% of the world's wide body aircraft installed with inmarsat systems. there is no further examination of the industry required. -- further investment needed. >> if the airlines and aircraft builders already have the technology on their planes and you were providing this service co

they're going back to the inmarsat data.use remember, it was the inmarsat final handshake that led them to search for the pings here. and then, of course, once they picked up the ping literally on the first day they put the microphone on the water -- or the sonar, the listening devices, then they were anchored on that fact. so i think they're going back to this inmarsat data. it's a wider area because they have no pings. there's no possibility of any pings at this late date. so it is back to the drawing board, meaning back to the inmarsat data. australia has said they might try to put on traditional aviation navigation waypoints, like what you'd fly if you were flying the highway in the sky to see if it's possible the plane was following those on its own or by piloting. so they still have the leads that they had before. they just don't have the ping data because it's been exhausted. >> mary schiavo and david soucie, thanks so much for joining us and lending us your expertise, as always. >>> ahead for us "@this hour," there's

inmarsat has now put out its data, but not its calculations. >> right. >> so? >> i would like richard and everyone else in the world to get their head around the fact that we have no reason to think that the plane went south except for the say so of inmarsat and the search authorities. and if we can't trust them to be right about the acoustic pingers, i don't think we should have excessive amounts of faith. listen, they just recently released what they said was the raw data. that raw data was missing. the key crucial -- >> the calculations. >> the analysis, the algorithm. et cetera. >> very quickly before we go, is everything on the table now in terms of where to look? >> no, everything is not on the table. but what is important is this is how often air crash investigations go. there have been so many crashes i've been involved in investigating, and you pull out and go over it. well don't even have the wreckage yet. but you pull out and go over the wreckage time and time again. you throw out theories and investigate them. the most important thing is not to get

journalist schulman writes either inmarsat snals doesn't make sense or it's flat out wrong and inmarsatthbound motion. the frequency along those paths should be different in the one inmarsat has produced. heart broken flight 370 families are begging malaysian authorities to release the expert so other experts can take a look at. . families have been told no over and over again. could this new report make a difference? with me now is the reports author and executive editor of the new atlantis, ari schulman. when did you get suspicion first of the satellite data? >> i saw these reports and the reports said that other satellite experts had taken a look at this and said that it looked correct. and my interest in it really was to see if i could sort of reproduce the results, follow the work of others who are reproducing the results and maybe refine it and see if you could narrow down most likely paths. when i started doing that work and so did others the math didn't look like it made sense and not interpreted in the way that would allow you to narrow it down. characteristics you would expect

. >> the raw data is with inmarsat, not with malaysia, not with australia, not with mas. so, if there is any request for this raw data to be made available to the public, it must be made to inmarsat. >> reporter: now, inmarsat, the company that owns those satellites, insists it's already shared what it has. that information was first shown to the malaysians in a presentation from a laptop computer, and to this day, as we heard, the malaysians say they don't have any raw data. angus houston, head of the search operation, says it may be a matter of proprietary information, and the satellite company isn't required to divulge its trade secrets. inmarsat shared the conclusions that were reached by a panel of experts who analyzed that raw data. that's not the same as making the raw data public. family members in china have been the most vocal in their demands for complete transparency. they fear facts are being hidden from them. would it make any difference? australian search coordinator angus houston again told cnn this -- "no, i don't think so. there's been a lot of expertise

military base. >> i think the inmarsat data is very accurate in that regard.ew that before, and this data released today just re-enforces that conclusion. it did not go to diego garcia. >> the data isn't perfect. the arcs could be off by about six miles either way. plus, after losing fuel, the plane could have glided for 23 miles in either direction. put together, that's a margin of error nearly 60 miles wide. well, tomorrow we reach a major turning point. we know the underwater search using bluefin-21 comes to an end. we do know that there will not be any searching until about august. that's when they hope to switch things over to the private sector using different equipment to search for some debris. >> at least for the next few months, no search at all. >> exactly. >> thanks for that report. let's talk about all these developments with our panel. peter goelz is our aviation analyst. tom fuentes is our law enforcement analyst, former assistant director of the fbi, and tim farrar is a satellite communicates expert. tim, what do you make of the data that's bee

malaysia or inmarsat?with paul ginsburg who worked with the fbi and homeland security department and the cia about the controversy. >> it ourturns out the malaysia government has a poor history. they changed what they reported as the aircraft's altitude direction, the transcript. they said that the last transmission was, all right, good night. where clearly it wasn't. the release of the transcripts was first withheld, then it was -- then they were released. then the actual communications were released. and, in fact, i looked at those transmissions, and what they released was edited. in fact, there's even a very low voice. neither pilot nor tower in that released audio that they gave us. as far as who has the permission or the authority to withhold or release the information, really, whoever -- i don't care who it comes from, we need the data. and as far as i'm concerned with respect to the malaysian government, i would not buy a used car from them. >> right now, officials are determining the next search ph

there is any request for the raw data to be made available it must be made to inmarsat. >> and inmarsat said whoa, not so fast. it's not something that inmarsat can release. >> the question is who has the power to release the most crucial clue. joining me to discuss is cnn. is it malaysia who can say this? >> malaysia doesn't have the raw data. >> it had to have come down. so the malaysians are right. they don't have the raw data. the raw data wouldn't be of any use to them. some say that inmarsat is protecting pro prior tear information. the real continue we haven't found anything. >> that is what so many experts can say. there are a lot of smart people. there are a lot of people in this world who could look at it and help the teams already in place find this plane. >> it is malaysia's right. they own the information as part of the investigation. that's by treaty. it may be. >> we have got to remember that it did lead investigators to a site where they tracked pings coming from under water for two hours and 20 minutes. it expired. they search that area. something is wrong. >> doubts wi

the malaysian government and officials from the british satellite firm inmarsat previously denied having it. now they've issued a joint statement saying they're working on releasing it in the name of transparency. let's bring in saima mohsin, monitoring the developments live from kuala lumpur this morning. so, now after this delay, with the families asking so many times to see this raw data, now they're going to make it available. tell us what we can expect to see. >> reporter: yeah, good morning, christine. yeah, we've had this snowball effect overnight in kuala lumpur. first, the acting transportation minister announcing that he has asked the departments of civil aviation to work with inmarsat. then early morning here kuala lumpur time, another press release coming jointly from inmarsat, the satellite company, and the civil aviation department, saying they're working together. what they want to do, christine, according to them, is present this information in two parts, really. there will be the raw data that the families have been demanding so long, as we know, we've really been campai

. >> the raw data is with inmarsat.r australia. so if there is any request for this raw data to be made available to the public, it must be made to inmarsat. >> joining us, our aviation analyst mary schiavo and david soucie. mary, so what do you think of this? does it make sense? does it stand to reason? malaysia is basically saying we don't have the raw data, pointing the finger at inmarsat. are they passing the buck here? >> they are passing the buck. if they don't have the raw data, there has been a tremendous amount of resource and not to mention mental anguish because of this. they have followed these leads to the exclusion of any others. and now when they ask for the families and public ask for data, they don't have it, inmarsat does. i can't believe they don't have any of the data. and if they have it, then according to iko rules, they can release the data of their investigation into this crash. so it's a big buck-passing move and probably a clue of what's to come in the investigation. >> and david, we seem to be

we're trying to interpret that data, and we'd really like to share it with inmarsat. >> so what about, though, if it's not where they're looking, if it turns out they're wrong. how would you explain the other pings, the ones that have been under the water that they picked up that have supposedly come from the black boxes. >> and that we received information that we're investigating about that as well. we can't really confirm it yet. but we're waiting for last-minute information from some of the airlines that are testing those pingers to see if they really can have a lower frequency or higher frequency. and so far it looks like they can only reproduce wit a higher frequency. >> and of course it came in lower. >> that's rights. so there are some real question there's as well. we've been saying all along it's this convergence of data, this convergence of information that gives us so much confidence. there is two things pointing to the same place. now with this in question and with the pingers in question, is it really convergence of data or is it conclusions we have drawn others ahead of

they question why the inmarsat data led them to the southern arc. led them to the northern arc they believe. is there an easy way to explain that? >> well, here's what i want to say about this article. it is a very fine piece of journalism. a thorough analysis of an incomplete piece of data. they don't have the full picture because inmarsat has not released it. so they've taken what is an incomplete body of data and subbig holes in methodology and attempted to analyze that using great experts. unfortunately we don't know whether they found some bona fide holes in inmarsat's logic and conclusions or they're just operating in the dark somewhat and we have to give inmarsat the benefit of the doubt. at this point, until inmarsat releases this data and that's up to the malaysians, and they've said no so far, we're just going to have to keep groping around in the dark. and that's unfortunate. >> david, final thought from you. do you think if the malaysian authorities would for some reason decide to release it, i would be inclined to think they who l. not

who should release it. >> raw data is within inmarsat, not with malaysia or australia. made available to the public, it must be made to inmarsat. >> the data belongs to the malaysian authorities, not something inmarsat can release. >> reporter: flight 370 checked with a satellite once an hour. the angle of the transmissions led to these two arcs where the plane could have been, but which one? similar to how the change in sound of a train can tell you if it's coming toward you or moving away from you, frequency shifts and satellite connections helped engineers track the plane. measured on a graph, it looks like this. a predicted track to the north and one to the south. mh-370's actual satellite connections most closely matched the path to the south. and that's where the focus remains. it's this data that both sides say only the other can release. >> i don't know who to believe, but isn't it awful that it's quite evident somebody is lying here? somebody is lying. we're talking about something that involves a missing airliner now 70 days. lives lost. families shattered. an

take a long, hard look at it and try to help inmarsat.ou so, i knew you were wrong and throwing out additional theories that would create one big distraction. it is about helping the process. he's calling on these experts to be responsible. >> go ahead, richard. >> yeah, rene makes such a good point. i've got to say, from everything i've looked at with this, this idea that somehow inmarsat came up with some numbers and everybody else bought on to it is just simply not the case. you're talking about inmarsat, rolls-royce, boeing, the aaib, the ntsb, numerous professors at various universities, other satellite companies. i'm not saying there aren't other experts that have something to contribute, but we need to understand that this information has been very widely reviewed. the only difference is, it hasn't been put into the public domain. i can tell you everything your people have called for today is most likely going to be released. >> richard quest will be joining us tomorrow, peter goelz, rene march, guys thank you very much. >>> the bi

>> inmarsat blew that argument.ot law, they are guidelines. they are guidelines that our ntsb follows as well. once that data was given to the organization, then you have to reasonably assume it will be released because the guidelines say at the end of the investigation, you should release all of the information. any proprietary claims are blown, especially since inmarsat said it was geometry. they used math and data. now you have to show your work just like we had to do in school. >> keith masback and mary schiavo, thank you for taking the time to be with us. >> thank you. >>> still to come, the nba is moving ahead with a forced sale of the clippers. >> but the league is talking to shelly sterling about a voluntary sale? what is going on? we will talk about that. ♪ saturday, it's saturday ♪ yeah, yeah, yeah aan, in 20. orbiting the moon in 1971. [ male announcer ] once it's earned, usaa auto insurance is often handed down from generation to generation. because it offers a superior level of protection. and because u

they still have a very high degree of confidence in the work that they've done on the inmarsat.hey believe they're in the right location. as tom indicated, they may not have the equipment necessary to find the wreckage. it may be deeper than where the bluefin can go. >> peter, tom, thanks very much. we'll continue to watch this story. >>> still to come, donald sterling says he's sorry. so what is his wife saying about the racist comments, the expected sale of the last clippers? we're going to hear her take. stand by. >>> later, newly released excerpts of hillary clinton's upcoming memoir. predicting the future is a pretty difficult thing to do. but, manufacturing in the united states means advanced technology. we learned that technology allows us to be craft oriented. no one's losing their job. there's no beer robot that has suddenly chased them out. the technology is actually creating new jobs. siemens designed and built the right tools and resources to get the job done. trwith secure wifie for your business. it also comes with public wifi for your customers. not so with intern

inmarsat said they turned it over to the malaysians.ve issued a joint statement saying they're working together to release it in the name of transparency. let's bring in saima mohsin, monitoring developments live from kuala lumpur this morning. good morning, saima. >> reporter: morning, john. yeah, this is something extraordinary, isn't it? we've heard so much about this raw data. a simple explanation would be, we have it, we're going to give it to you, be completely transparent, but we've had so many different statements from the malaysian government, from inmarsat, the satellite data company that said it had developed this data, all kind of throwing the ball in one another's court. and the families were pulling their hair out. we've been speaking to them, saying, please, share it with us, because this is what everything rests upon. this is the data that led everyone to take their search to the southern indian ocean. well, finally, late last night -- and i can tell you, we have been phone-bashing here in kuala lumpur. finally, the mala

you have to be true to the inmarsat handshakes and follow that more closely.nd that, i believe is what they're going to be doing in the future. driving back to where the handshakes led the plane. >> so reginee if i understand ts right, you're basically told by analyzing the data from the bluefin, no black box was found. so therefore, the pings they thought they heard were not from the plane? >> flatly, yes, that is what we're told. they essentially said look we had bluefin down there. and we know that that bluefin completed its last mission today, searching some 300 miles of as soon as floor. they say if the black boxes were there they would have picked them up. i said what is the sound, they would have detected it on four occasions. the answer is, they really do not know. they don't believe it was from the black boxes. but perhaps it could have been a sound from the ocean shield, the search itself. >> how confident would you be that you can just rule out the presence of black boxes? >> that is a great question, anderson, and i haven't seen any of the data yet

i think the inmarsat data is very accurate in that regard.e knew that before and this data released today just reinforces that conclusion. it did not go to diego garcia. >> reporter: but some families are not sure just yet. >> there is no direct evidence. >> reporter: rene marsh, cnn, washington. >>> joining me now is sara bajc whose partner philip wood was on the plane. does the release of this data raise any questions for you, give you any confidence about where philip might be, that investigators are looking in the right place? >> the preliminary feedback that i have received from a few of the individuals looking at the information is that there is some interesting discrepancies specifically around the first frequencies. that might be something that they are going to look into a little bit more. >> the bluefin-21, the underwater drone that's been searching the floor of the ocean is wrapping up its phase of the search. the next phase won't start for a few months. are you surprised that after all of this time there still hasn't been one conc

inmarsat had declined to make that information public but inmarsat and malaysian authorities now say it. >>> the nba has now formally charged donald sterling. the setting a june 3rd vote to decide whether he will retain ownership of the l.a. clippers. 22 of the 29 owners would need to agree to strip the team from him. terming has a week to answer the charges. his lawyer is asking for a three-month delay to prepare a response. i'm not sensing that the nba or the commissioner has patience for that. they're anxious to get this going and happening. >> it will be interesting to watch, too, because we've never seen anything like this before. it's not a trial. >> right. >> right. exactly right. >>> all right. different kind of test, different kind of trial with the big primaries. let's get to john king and "inside politics" on "new day." >> it's a big day. if there was a super tuesday in 2014 it is today. some big tests. effort republican establishment effort to, quote, crush the tea party. kentucky senator mitch mcconnell on the ballot today would be the republican majority leader if he ca

. >>> why is it taking so long to get that inmarsat data from the missing malaysian airliner?double check... my watch! [ male announcer ] it pays to double check, with state farm. my watch! are the largest targets in the world, for every hacker, crook and nuisance in the world. but systems policed by hp's cyber security team are constantly monitored for threats. outside and in. that's why hp reports and helps neutralize more intrusions than anyone... in the world. if hp security solutions can help keep the world's largest organizations safe, they can keep yours safe, too. make it matter. [ chainsaw buzzing ] humans. sometimes, life trips us up. sometimes, we trip ourselves up. and although the mistakes may seem to just keep coming at you, so do the solutions. like multi-policy discounts from liberty mutual insurance. save up to 10% just for combining your auto and home insurance. call liberty mutual insurance at... to speak with an insurance expert and ask about all the personalized savings available for when you get married, move into a new house, or add a car to your policy.

we're talking about hundreds of miles elsewhere along that inmarsat arc. and we do know that that search won't resume until months from now. erin? >> are they giving up on the pings altogether? >> well, again, we know that the u.s. navy official said in very plain language yesterday that those signals are most likely not from the black boxes. we should note, though, hours after that interview aired, the navy tried to walk back that comment a little bit, calling it premature or speculative. perhaps premature. but this morning, we want to be clear. the navy did say it was accurate. but it appears that australian authorities are taking a little bit more cautious approach when it comes to the pings, saying at this point that at this stage, they do not understand the signals sufficiently to understand the cause. and they say that they are now studying them. so it is clear that the emphasis is really on that inmarsat data, not so much on the pings. >> just pretty incredible that they're now just getting to that conclusion, 50 days after they have listened to the

inmarsat says not so fast, malaysia. relevant data and it's up to malaysia to decide to release any of it is publicly. our aviation analyst richard quest explains exactly what inmarsat give to malaysia. >> reporter: the 14 numbers, they are the time that it takes for the aircraft to make its signal up to the satellite and to the ground station and the time for it to get back again. there are seven in orbit as well. you get the 14 numbers. there are no reams of raw data. let me say that again. there are no vast tombs, there are no volumes, there are simply two sets of logs. those relating to mh-370 and those relating to the various specimen flights that they used to make the comparisons. those logs are -- or what is the raw data by which everybody has then gone on to do their analysis. my understanding quite clear -- >> yeah. >> -- is that that data has been provided to the malaysians. >> now, richard also says that malaysia cannot release the data according to an international treaty that guides plane crash investigation

have the outside look. >> miles why wouldn't inmarsat just release all the data? >> it is not their purview, anderson, i suspect if they had their choice they would. but we've seen the malaysians and their track record on the information. there are customs and rules that go along with the accident investigation. one of the rules is you hold back the information until you have the final answer and release it. that may be the norm. it is time to break rules. this is an extraordinary event and we have great experts the world over who are looking at a percentage of the picture. we don't even know what percentage of the picture, what has been held back. and are coming up with holes. those might be real holes, a fact of the function they don't have the real picture. all the real reason for the malaysians to do what i think is morally, absolutely mandatory at this point to release all this data for the families who are emotionally wrought. >> the passengers released an open letter saying we implore the malaysian government to release and share the information of the inma

then the inmarsat data verifies where on the arc it is. >> i know little about this satellites and arcss on the arc of 40 degrees from the satellite. so that is the last bit down here where it's on 40 degrees. >> that's right. >> i hope we're not confusing people with all this. for those of us who didn't do so well in math. >> how could we not? >> basically, the inmarsat circles, what we're drawing, all they're doing is measuring the time it takes for the signal to travel from the plane to the saddle light. and as it moves, that changes by milliseconds. that's how you get those circles on the map. and that's all we're talking about here, all the other stuff you don't need to -- you don't have to understand the math. >> right. what i'm saying is -- miles, you're making the right point because the perspective is what matters here. we're just saying i don't care about the angle or anything else. i'm just saying from the new data that we have, there's now a basis for confidence in what they did in terms of plotting data points of where this plane might be. that's the point that we now know.

>> very first thing we're looking for, and really, the brass ring we want to grab is that inmarsat data, that famous set of pings that is really our only clue to what ultimately happened to this plane. and if they've put in the full set of data with all the full accuracy that we believe that they have, that could be huge. and also, even better yet would be if they could include the details of how they performed this analysis that they say excludes the northern arc and proves it has to be in the southern ocean. >> open sources so scientists and analysts around the world can get the information, dig in and gain confidence in it. >> absolutely, that would be amazing. >> do you think it will raise doubts or end doubts, what we find in this report? >> well, we hope that it's really going to be as forthright and full in its disclosure as it should be. obviously, one of the big problems of this investigation so far is that the information, the malaysian authorities have been so stingy in releasing what they know, and that's allowed so many unverified reports to come out. there's a whole flood

. >> and you spent time at inmarsat. this changes the game. >> no, it doesn't. it doesn't change the handshakes. that is really important. everybody still has -- there is a lot of credibility that the plane went south. that has been checked many times. what this means is you have to go back. you have to be more true to the inmarsat handshakes and follow those more closely. and that, i believe, is what they're going to be doing in the future. driving back to where the handshakes led the plane. >> so, renee, now, if i understand this right, you're basically being told by underwater search by the bluefin after all the pictures it took during the search no black box was found so, therefore, the pings they thought they heard were not from the plane? >> flatly, yes, that is what we're told. they essentially said, look, we had bluefin down there. and we know that that bluefin completed its last mission today, searching some 300 miles of ocean floor. they say if the black boxes were there, they would have picked them up. so i said, well, what was this sound then that wa

the malaysians say the satellite company inmarsat didn't give it to them.he company says, yes, we did. the australians say, well, we don't have it. meanwhile, the families once again forced to wait. we're going to get to the bottom of it coming up. so i tried depend last weekend. it made the difference between hearing about my daughter's gym meet, and being there. yeah! nailed it! i got back to doing what i love. that's my daughter. hi sweetie! gotta dial it back a little bit on the rock climbing. one weekend can make all the difference. unlike the bargain brand, depend gives you the confidence of new fit-flex® protection. it's a smooth and comfortable fit with more lycra strands. it's our best protection. take your weekend on with a free sample at depend.com >>> one of the scariest things about wildfires, what you're looking at right now. that is a fire nato. one of the big problems in fighting the wildfires in california right now. the question becomes, what's going on with them? they kind of look like a twister of fire and that's because that's exactly w

remember this inmarsat data?the information used to calculate the search area for that missing plane. well, a malaysian official now says that data could soon be made public. our experts explain what that could mean for the search. captain: this is a tip. bellman: thanks, captain obvious. captain: and here's a tip. when you save money on hotel rooms, it's just like saving money on anything else that costs money. like shoes, textiles, foreign investments, spatulas, bounty hunters, javelins... life with crohn's disease ois a daily game of "what if's". what if my abdominal pain and cramps come back? what if the plane gets delayed? what if i can't hide my symptoms? what if? but what if the most important question is the one you're not asking? what if the underlying cause of your symptoms is damaging inflammation? for help getting the answers you need, talk to your doctor and visit crohnsandcolitisinfo.com to get your complimentary q&a book, with information from experts on your condition. >>> last night's billboard a

malaysian authorities and the firm inmarsat are promising to release the raw data.cident investigator david soucie to discuss this. if you could, just break it down for us, why is this raw data so important, and why the holdup in releasing it? >> the reason it's so important is because the only way to verify it by outside eye, whether or not the calculations used to instigate the search, are accurate or not. we've worked with self-people through communications with michael esner, for example, who's a satellite specialist. he'll be able to look at that data. remember, there might be more data they need than what's being given. but i think we'll be able to get everything they need, othver ti. >> do you expect some wildly different theories? >> absolutely, speculation will run wild. i beg that people that are following this story rely on the experts. there's going to be tweets. everybody knows this. we'll have all kinds of satellite experts. but there's only a few that i have credibility with and that have credibility with me and that's michael and his group and i thin

over data that the entire -- search for malaysia flight 370 just what data did malaysia get from inmarsat? >>> a close call for two u.s. passenger planes. how close do they come to colliding over the pacific ocean? then we gave each person a ribbon to show how many years that amount might last. i was trying to, like, pull it a little further. [ woman ] got me to 70 years old. i'm going to have to rethink this thing. it's hard to imagine how much we'll need for a retirement that could last 30 years or more. so maybe we need to approach things differently, if we want to be ready for a longer retirement. ♪ mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals, antioxidants, and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition in charge™. he was a matted messiley in a small cage. ng day. [ bottle ] ensure®. so that was our first task, was getting him to wellness. without angie's list, i don't know if we could have found all the services we needed for our riley. from contractors and doctors to dog si