clinton kept inquiring about queen. >> lightning round! lightning round. >> you know, nicky, do you think it was a jerk move on his part. when they talk about wedding, the only thing tha the guests remember is this american guy is pinching people's butts? >> i would love clinton to drop in my welding. the only thing i got her maiden name was seamen. that is all i found. >> i think you just stole joe's next joke. >> i'm tuned out.

inquirer. which is not. that's a sort of lively paper, but no one takes it as the paper of record, particularly. but i mean, it's not, you know, it wouldn't kb regarded as where you would go first. and then you've got your papers like, you know, usa today, wall street journal, new york times, "washington post," los angeles times. and in those papers, of them has a pretty defined personal in terms of the basic political outlook and so on. usa today, maybe a little less. but you still would expect the stories in there to be basically accurately written, even if they were chosen for a particular purpose. that is the distinction. i really find it hard to see how making that distinction is somehow a breach. and this is what is important. if you don't hold out your news organ to be a news organ. dp you say, look, we're not interested in what the facts are. once we take a view on something, you're not getting the facts. you're getting our view. fair enough that's not what happened. and, you know, what

the reaction to the whole thing has been very -- the inquirer has been illuminative. in part aggressively defensive of the media's position. i hope that the press will work with a solution rather than against the solution. by recognizing the last thing i want to do is imperil freedom speech or free press. and that if any suggestion i have might have that possibility as i talked about them, and i have no doubt at all that they will pour over the words i've just uttered to you. but to get a solution that will work and that is sensible, most certainly. >> well, i think those people who engaged in the political side should help do that. and i think it can improve the quality of political debate and democracy. i think you're right in recognizing this is very tough. but the key will be to establish a basis that allows a situation in which most people in my position have been uncomfortable with a long time to have that resolved in a way that is right and proper and fair. >> i'm not suggesting they should hold judges and politicians to a count whatever they do. >> i'm sure th

it is the national inquirer after all.e being considered for a pulitzer prize in reference t to their covering of john edwards. the point is that if you publish something, even if you argue she with us a public figure. the case in "the new york times" versus sullivan, no relation to keith that says that you have to stab that it's a public figure that it was published with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard as to its truth, they have some obligation to check out the sources an even sur insure that they are truthful. they didn't do so, so a defamation case may law. jamie: what are the damages? >> that's the problem, here, jaime there rile are no damages. i suspect this lawsuit was filed simply to get to the inquirer to back off away from this family. certain lie it's a hard-breaking case, in the court of law i don't see the claims succeeding. as joey pointed out in a deaf tp defamation case she was declared deceased back in january. you didn't defame someone who is no longer with us. jamie: the mother doesn't believe

they can inquire about your immigration status.g win for the obama white house. but i would take my hat off to governor brewer because she went back and changed the law to say you can't just engage in racial profiling. there has to be legitimate reason if you stop the person. at that point in coordination with federal law. it's thoroughly legitimate for law enforcement officer to say fred barnes, do you have -- are you a citizen? >> of course. >> you don't have to have your papers -- >> bret: but fred does, apparently. your thoughts? >> i have a work permit. governor brewer is right. centerpiece is upheld. ask about the immigration status. then mara was saying, look, we'll be watching. you better do it right. the police used it warily. on the other hand it's a weakness. let me add one more thing. requires someone to have a work permit to have a job, otherwise you're here illegally. if you have a job without a work permit -- i don't know what is wrong with having that. or require them to have documents. both of those were struck dow

do you know if occ inquired about trades as the regulators, these five regulators, did they inquire about the trades prior to the earnings call? >> i don't know. >> at what point can you tell us did occ take steps to challenge the trades? >> i think the second that they understood the significance of the trades they started to challenge it every day. and they continued to. >> five regulators in london enough? >> i don't know the answer, but i would say in a modern day in age, they get all the reports from london. they can do it by tell presence. so physical location isn't important. i should point out the 19,000 employees in columbus serve global clients. they serve 30 million americans. they serve a lot of middle market companies. we run a lot of call centers there. they process our credit cards, which we ship around the country. so those employees are not just doing ohio-based business. >> a couple other points. since 2007 your chief investment office has grown. occ says that your activities were not considered to be high risk, but they go on to say a similar situation large hedges that

have you inquired since then if there was such a limit and if it was changed. >> no. >> you have not asked within your organization? >> i think we referred to something back in 2007 or 2008, so i did not ask, no. >> you did say last week that the failure with these trades was not that it was rogue traders. they weren't violating the risk controls. the risk controls were not sufficient. that is correct, right? >> they were too low -- they were too high. they should have been much more lore limits. >> did they have any limits. last week you seemed to indicate not? >> the cio is total limits. the unit didn't have their own. but they used the cio's limits. >> but a limb of $20 million in losses and then you close the position that would be a fairly granular risk control, wouldn't it? >> if that were true. it depends with the areas, but yes. >> you have been very critical in this matter and you said that it was a significant risk management failure. said it was flawed, complexed, poorly reviewed, executed, poorly managed. but on february 29 you filed a certification required by law that y

do you know if occ inquired about trades as regulators? the five regulators or maybe regulators back in new york, did they inquire about the trades prior to the earnings call? >> i don't know. >> at what point -- can you tell us at what point did occ take steps to challenge the trades? >> i think the second that they understood the significance of the trades, they started to challenge it every day. they continue to. >> five investigators in london enough? >> i don't know. this day in age, they get reports from london and they can do it by telepresence so physical location isn't as important. i should point out by the way, the 19,000 employees in columbus, serve global clients. they serve 30 million americans. largest middle market lender. a lot of middle market companies. they innovate. we run call centers there. they process credits cards which are shipped around the country. those employees are not just doing ohio based business. >> i appreciate that. a couple other points. since 2007, your chief investment office grown from 76 to $376 b

the law allows police officers to inquire about the immigration of people they pull over even for unrelated offenses, but there is an anti- profiling provision in the law and florida senator marco rubio said today based on the border difficulties in arizona, he thinks the law is good for arizona. >> i believe arizona has a right to pass that bill. i understand why they did it, but i don't think it's a national model and i don't think other states should follow suit. for example, i don't want to see a law like that in florida, but what the supreme court analyzes is the constitutionality of the law and i do believe arizona has a constitutional right to do this. >> reporter: nobody knows how the court will rule, but democrats say they know when the president halted deport as of dream act eligible participants it put romney way behind with latinos. >> the difficulty with mitt romney is he was so vicious in going at the immigration issue he locked himself in. he's now trying to play hide and seek on the issue of whether he supports what the president did for all those young americans, the dreame

placements and the director of the workforce development is here to elaborate on anything you like to inquire about regarding work force. with regard to the film budget, the overall production has increased by about 3% since last year. we have seen the number of -- the number that has applied for the rebate program has grown significantly. there were only three feature films between 2006 and 200010 that applied for and received their rebates. we saw three feature films apply in two years between 2010 and 2012 at just in 2012 we have had brief elms apply for the rebate. it has been funded to 7000 -- $700,000, an increase over what was previously available what we think it will spur the growth of this industry throughout the city. the film commission established the sf film collective. one of the main goals of the film commission next year is to work with local unions to promote san francisco as a film friendly and affordable place to film. the increases you see in the budget are due to the increased revenues we're receiving from permit fees as well as automatic increases in personnel. the majo

the one about the police inquiring into immigration status for now it stands. the ninth circuit was jumping the gun by putting an injunction in place. now they say it can play out in arizona. they also go on in this opinion that that doesn't mean once it goes into effect there can't be other legal challenges, once people how it actually plays out in practice there can be other legal challengeses to it. for now there is not enough in the record that would convince this court it's proper to enjoin the law before it ever takes effect. bill: here is another one that was kicked out then, all right 5c it makes it a crime for any i will lying alimmigrant to apply for work, publicly so is will it or perform work within the state's borders. vie hreurts would place 6 possible month in jail, 2500 fine and three years of probation. is that now, gone or can that be even joined at a lower level. >> basically the supreme court is saying that the ninth circuit got that right, when they put a hold on that one which would bar an illegal immigrant to go out to solicit work. if yo

it had an extensive inquiring and plumbing setup. >> i don't know what marijuana smells like. i was in the back room watching television. one of my fastballs came next door and said there was a fire outside so i went outside and saw the hillside on fire but i didn't know anything about the marijuana, period. >> police said the inquiring by passed the electrical meet we'recy typical in illegal operations. more often they are stumbling upon these types of pot farms. >> there's a lot of gray area in terms of what is legal and what isn't. we are going to have a lot of people who will stretch those boundaries and it would be common to stumble upon nor of these types of situations >> police say they found no paperwork inside to indicate a legitimate growing operation. they have not found the two people who rented the house. they could face charges of growing marijuana and stealing electricity. in san francisco, john alston, abc7 news. >> the ethics commission hearing for suspended san francisco sheriff ross mirkarimi will resume on july 18th when the attorneys will be allowed to cal

curiously the committee has not inquired with them. that's too bad. a review of finance records would reveal that there donors to political causes who are just waiting for an opportunity to be heard from. bank of america for instance made over 555,000 in contributions to my friends and individuals including several members of the committee. i'm not saying this because i know the members of this committee and they are honest people. we have to understand the cast over the proceedings when you have bank of america and you have goldman sachs being excluded from this kind of discussion. so i haven't seen the evidence of the favoritism that the majority alleged in the federal program supporting energy of the technologies, but i noticed the absence of several key players in the investigation and we need to address that. just a month ago, the chairman said he would invite his friend to testify to future hearings. i hope he will do so and extend similar invitations to governor brewer of arizona and former givens of nevada who i had the pleasure of serving wit

(jenkins) "we make no inquires on the street......in our custody at our detention center." center..but immigration groups stilllbelieve theetacticsused by the freddrickcounty sheriff amountto racial profilling of those who do not lookamerican. the baltimore city council mayor's 2-point - 3 billion dollar spending plan. council members rejjcted 6 million doolars in cuts.... proposed by council president jack young... as part of a plan to redirect funds toward rec centers and fire companies. that means threeecity fire companies remain on the chopping block.the mayor wants to eliminnae them to help close a 35 illion dollar ap in the city budget.but the fire union says it could jeopardizz public safety. "iq: i would have cut every dime i could..... oq: that's a crap plan." plan."the cityyaaso coosidered demotions as a way to hold down the fire depprttent's budget... but that plan are yourrtax dollars being spenttwisely?this week.... baltiiore city council voted á downá a plan hat would've city departments.some say it's necessary to ensure efficiency... but the mayor doesn't think so. so.me

it allows police officers to inquire about the immigration status of people they pull over. but there is an anti-profiling provision in the law and he said based on the boarder difficulties in arizona, he thinks the law is good for arizona. >> i believe arizona has a right to pass that bill but i think it is a national model. for example, i don't want to see a lot like that in florida. but what the supreme court analyzes is the constitutionality of the law. >> reporter: nobody knows how the court will rule but democrats say they know when they halted the dream act it put mitt romney behind with latinos. >> he was so vicious that he locked himself in. he is now playing hide and seek. >> reporter: he thinks the dream act is too broad and said we need to do something that doesn't encourage more illegal immigration. >>> more bad news from outwest. firefighters struggle to beat back flames in one fire. we will take you there next.  . >>> 2 dozen homes have been destroyed in a new colorado wildfire. burning near colorado springs. it started this weekend and eaten up three squar

the paycheck fairness act would have barred companies from retaliating against employees who inquire about their pay and would allow workers to seek punitive damages. opponents contend the bill would open the door to more lawsuits against employers. president obama did get some good news on the war on terrorism. the u.s. military confirmed the second in command was killed in a drone strike in pakistan. abu yahya al libi helped transform al qaeda into a terrorist movement, winning converts all the world. jury selection resumes on the gerry sandusky sex abuse trial. nine jurors were chosen today. the former penn state assistant football coach faces 52 criminal counts for alleged sexual abuse of 10 boys. jurors are being picked from people live in state college, the same place where the main campus is located. >> queen elizabeth ii marked the final and no doubt exhausting fourth day of celebrating with a thank you. the queen did thank her subjects for what she calls the countless kindnesses shown terror. they wrapped up a grand party for the mottaki. -- monarchy. >> baltimore was the st

it had an extensive inquiring and plumbing setup. an air filtration system. the pot smell, though, was unmistaken when they came to dismantle everything. >> i don't know what marijuana smells like. i was in the back room watching television. one of my neighbors came next door and said there was a fire outside, so i went outside and saw the hillside on fire, but i didn't know anything about the marijuana, period. >> pga shut off power to the house. >> police said the inquiring by passed the electrical meters, which is typical in illegal operations. mr. often police and firefighters are stumbling upon these types of pot farms. >> there's a lot of gray area in terms of what is legal and what isn't. we are going to have a lot of people who will stretch those boundaries and it would be common to stumble upon more of these types of situations >> police say they found no paperwork inside to indicate a legitimate growing operation. they have not found the two people who rented the house. they could face charges of growing marijuana and stealing electricity. in san fr

could i inquire as to the time available? the chair: the gentleman from arizona has 23 1/2 minutes left. the gentleman from washington has 24 1/2 minutes remaining. mr. grijalva: thank you, mr. chairman. i continue to reserve. the chair: the gentleman from arizona reserves. the gentleman from washington. mr. hastings: thank you, mr. chairman. mr. chairman, i'm pleased to yield three minutes to the gentleman from texas, the author of title 5 of this bill, mr. flores. the chair: the gentleman from texas is recognized for three minutes. mr. flores: mr. chairman, i rise today in support of h.r. 2578, title 5 of this bill incorporates my legislation, h.r. 1545rks and would recognize and establish the waco mammoth site as a national monument. in 1978, waco residents paul and eddie were out looking for arrowheads and fossils along a river. during their journey they happened to come across a large bone pro truding from the earth. real -- protruding from the earth. they immediately took the bone to the museum at baylor university for

given the fascinating evidence that was presented by the inquirer. would the prime minster agree to publish the phone records so we can find the establishment what conversations happened. >> government cannot release information provided by previous governments. i'm sure this is an issue that the previous prime minster will want to consider given the very clear statement that he made. >> the prime minster probably not aware that my constituency -- hmrc are reinterpreting these products. under pressure from the european commission. with their interpretation. will he ensure a treasury minister -- >> i haven't tried one of the delicious beverages. i will wait after tomorrow before trying. i do understand there is an issue involved with hmrc. i will be happy to arrange a meeting between him and the treasury minister so they can look carefully at this

>> not that the public is generally inquired about such important positions and representation, but since we are here, i nominate petra de jesus, who i find to be a much more people's advocate than you, sir, mr. mazzucco. seeing as how it is not an effective nomination, i would ask that you emily it -- i ask that you emulate what we like to see with police accountability. >> thank you. i appreciate your opinion and i always look to commissioner de jesus for advice. public comment is now closed. >> i will start with calling the roll on the motion to elect president mazzucco to another term. moved and seconded. i will start with commissioner marshall. >> aye, aye. >> i think he only gets one. >> commissioner de jesus. >> aye. >> commissioner kingsley. >> aye. >> commissioner loftus. >> aye. >> commissioner mazzucco you get a vote, too. i will assume that is ayer. >> yes. >> the vote carries unanimously. >> again, i appreciate everyone's opinion. we are seven commissioners, and we all have one vote. i have learned a lot from everyone of you different perspectives. this is part of the growing

have you inquired since then if there was such a limit and it was changed? no. >> you have not asked within your organization? >> i think you referred to something back in '07 or '08. i did not ask, no. >> you did say last week that the fail with these trades was not that it was rogue traders, they weren't violating the risk control. the risk control was not sufficient. that is correct, right? >> they were too low. they were too high. there should have been much more lower limits they had, yes. >> did they have any limits? last weaker you seemed to indicate not. >> it was a total of limits but they didn't have its own and used the cio limits they eventually stopped it at this level of loss. >> a limit of $20 million loss and then you close the position, that would be a fairly granular risk control, wouldn't it? >> if that were true, depends where the area is but yes. >> you have been very critical of jpmc in this matter and said it was a significant risk management failure, poorly reviewed, flawed, poorly executed, poorly managed. on february 29 you filed a

because the issue that we're talking about that it testimony goes to is one where i was interested in inquiring about exactly the witness mr. keith referred to. >> the witness chief lansdowne. >> but it led know have that very same question about whether we are -- how closely we must view to the, call it a charging document or statement of concerns if we -- and it's extreme if we found that there had been behavior that we felt fit within the initiative definition but hadn't been -- the definition -- the definition in the initiative but not in the charging documents, whether we would be precluded from considering it. that's a hypothetical we don't have to address right now but we're on that line of how closely or how specifically these issues need to have been identified or put another way, what room and responsibility we have to determine whether there's behavior that fit the definition or behaver that fit the definition and was raised by the mayor's charge. >> i think that's a fair point. the charges are, this is the bill of particulars so this is actually more detailed than the charging docum

curly, the committee has not inquired with them. and that's too bad. it's like we're having a party here and the main guests that should be here aren't present. a review of campaign finance records would reveal that there are donors to political causes who are just waiting for an opportunity to be heard from. bank of america, for instance, made over 555,000 in contributions to my friends in the republican party's pact and individualings and several members of this committee. we have to understand the call that's cast over the proceedings when you have bank of america and goldman sachs being excluded from this kind of discussion. so i haven't seen the evidence of the favoritism that the majority has alleged in the federal program supporting renewable energy technologies. but i have noticed the absence of several key players and i think we need to address that. just a month ago, the chairman said he would invite former governor. i hope that he will do so. today continues our 17805 loan guarantee program to the energy security. going forward, i hope we ca

. >> several high-profile companies have -- have inquired about buying ad space. >> the mission that will be set up will have the unions as part of that and they will decide how it is affixed to the actual engine. >> the mayor is not quite as confident that the ads will bring in enough tax to say the fire company. >> i don't think it will be enough, but i understand and respect their desire to look at creative ways to fund our priorities. >> the mayor's priorities do not match up with the city council. monday, council members made it clear they are willing to attack her funding priorities if he ignores theirs. they have voted to cut over five minutes dollars from the mayor's proposed budget, including police department funding. >> that is not acceptable. q. don't say congratulations, you have done a good job, and then recommend cutting the budget. it does not make common sense. i am not going to jeopardize the safety of our city. >> the budget negotiations are complicated and ongoing. tonight the city council passed a final version of the bottle tax. it raises the tax to 5 cents on e

i am here tonight to inquire as to whether an investigation was conducted on that matter by the office of citizen complaints. if there was one, i would like to get my hands on any information that is available to the public. >> we are not allowed to res

only after we inquired did they update this inspection that led to this closure.ng of a very different kind at this fairfax county restaurant making pizza without a license shut down z pizza because inspectors found it operating without the proper permit. the pizza shop is now back to making dough. when asked the health department spokesperson why previous inspections weren't on the website and several other critical inspections involving closures didn't show up either, she replied that some cases require additional review. when i pressed the matter, she hung up on me. finally, she sent an e-mail saying, primary concern for the health department is to protect the health and safety of residents. if there are cases that haven't been updated, we'll look into isolated incidents and work to correct any technical glitches. if you know of government failing, health issues, or injustice, contact us by e-mail at tips@wusa9.com. you can follow me on twitter or facebook. i'm investigative reporter, 9news now. >>> and russ says in prince georges county, health inspectors shut

i am here tonight to inquire as to whether an investigation was conducted on that matter by the office of citizen complaints. if there was one, i would like to get my hands on any information that is available to the public. >> we are not allowed to respond to questions. this was back in what year? >> the mid-1990's. >> ok. >> i know you guys are discreet and confidential with your investigations. >> nothing we can say. you can maybe put a call into the occ. there you go, mr. king. next speaker, please. next speaker? >> good evening. i was hoping that commissioner de jesus would be here so i could congratulate her on her recent victory. i have pressing matters. i would also like to take a few seconds to appreciate commissioner kingsley. i happen to observe for on a ridealong. she addressed a man that was nodding off in front of a storefront. they all acted with compassion. i am often critical and tonight will be no different, but i would like to address good things when i see them. i am here on very serious business. i am here responding to a commentary a few weeks ago when he was pres

standing -- and they can be still be challenged in the future -- simply allows police officers to inquire about the status of someone. if they contact the federal government and the government says we're not interested or the line is busy there's nothing they can do. it's a law without any feet. the bottom line here is the court has come down very strongly against the state interfering with federal power. i hope it's a sign that the politics of division of attacking and separating humanity here in the united states is... has seen its last day. >> ifill: mr. kobach, how much did the state impinge on state sovereignty in making decisions in siding with the federal government that there's only so far that states can go on these matters? >> well, let me first respond to the professor's comment about impinging on humanity. or somehow i am peuning a person's humanity. the law is about enforcing the rule of law and allowing statement and local governments to provide a reasonable amount of help in the course of normal duties. there is no disrespect for a person's humanity by simply saying we have

those who die, he inquires about their families. that is why people respected him. >> that is an obvious question, which is now that he is gone we have a person with many of these qualities that are not usually ascribed to him. he is somebody who had throughout his career got in fights with allies and as somebody that is not considered as charismatic and yet he is somebody that the affiliate organization have recognized as the new leader. rather than think about -- what are the strategic differences? particularly with affiliate groups and being welcomed when bin laden did not want to bring them into the fold? >> just as a qualifier, i do not know enough from primary sources as to how members of the jihad group look at him. he does not seem to be popular. i cannot say whether he is arrogant or not. to his credit, bin laden sacrificed his fortunes. he w

i still worried about who was getting ahead of you at the of philadelphia inquirer at that time. i could not get it out of my head. and i do not say this problem. i think my wife got tired of my neediness. my wife said, we have two sons that could die. i do not want to hear about your career. i do not want to hear about the plight of your story and whether it was on the front page of the metra section. i think it really began to bother her. tavis: why do you think this situation and condition could not bring you closer as opposed to separate you? there are parents watching right now that have had these challenges and it brought their relationship closer rather than make them more desperate. >> we all have dreams and aspirations for our kids. i know because of my own background. my dreams and aspirations were probably too high. i get frustrated easily. i can be volatile. instead of drawing us closer, which i think it has now, it did create a gap. i was very frustrated. i could not talk to him. i felt very, very stuck with him. at one point when he got into high school, i said to h

as he encounters these native people, he inquires of them. you can imagine the difficulty in communication. many of these native peoples have small, gold ornaments. just trifling little things. when the spaniards see gold, it immediately flashing into their minds that we have discovered this immense potential rich civilization. truth the matter was that the gold they saw among the natives were gold traded from the mainland frshgs the mexican platts toe, but it took generations for the gold trinkets -- there wasn't a gold mine over the next hill. of course, whenever columbus or his associates would ask the natives in how they would do it where did these riching come from, the answer was always the next village over. they were always anxious about it. you want to go to the next village over. as they went to the next village over, it was disappointment upon disappointment. they didn't find the great con. they didn't find people speaking chinese. they didn't see the fine silks and tees, everything they were looking for. none of it. none of it. on

in the inquirer's judgment, all the text messages i have referred to are irrelevant to the reference. the link letters also explained why text messages are not available. that will be put on the website. the one we are looking at is the seventh of october, 2009. i think that's during the party conference, but it's certainly within eight or nine days or so of the support she said but seriously. that contains or might contain something of a nature. i understand the times, let's discuss over country supper soon. let's look at the post endorsement and they were disappointed not to see you. i thought it was always the chance personified. i am so rooting for you tomorrow not as a permanent friend, but professionally, we are definitely in this together. they are rooting for you tomorrow. you are giving a speech at the party conference. the issue at the time was at the party conference, i had not been to the times party. the major newspaper groups. i haven't gone and i think that was what this was about. i was apologizing for that. that was her disappointment, as it were. if that helps. # but

have you inquired since then if there was such a limit and if it was changed. >> no. >> you have not asked within your organization? >> i think we referred to something back in 2007 or 2008, so i did not ask, no. >> you did say last week that the failure with these trades was not that it was rogue traders. they weren't violating the risk controls. the risk controls were not sufficient. that is correct, right? >> they were too low -- they were too high. they should have been much more lore limits. >> did they have any limits. last week you seemed to indicate not? >> the cio is total limits. the unit didn't have their own. but they used the cio's limits. >> but a limb of $20 million in losses and then you close the position that would be a fairly granular risk control, wouldn't it? >> if that were true. it depends with the areas, but yes. >> youave been critical in this matter and you said that it was a significant risk management failure. said it was flawed, complexed, poorly reviewed, executed, poorly managed. but on february 29 you filed a certification required by law that you had

. >> you are inquiring, but you wouldn't argue that case? >> not necessarily. >> i wouldn't think anyone would. we woke up trying to make money for the bank. so it's kind of a basic observation. the comptroller addressed this to you and i will ask to you keep your responses crisp to get through a series of questions. across america, small businesses are trying to get access to credit, they are highly frustrated and the ability to access credit is essential to the recovery of our economy. does it do damage to have the banks diverting deposits into hedge funds rather than making loans to families in small businesses? >> we are very supportive of small business lending by the entire spectrum of national banks that we europe vise from the largest -- >> that was not the question. is diverting into hedge fund rather than making loans damaging to our economy? >> i would hope not. i hope that was not the case. >> but it would be if deposits were diverted into hedge funds rather than making loans to small business. you are hoping it wasn't the case,