i think, you know, i've worked at community colleges, at elite institutions and proprietary institutions, and i've also worked on the hill at the white house, at two federal agencies, and i guess the conclusion i've come to is if you think the politics of capitol hill are ugly, then you haven't worked in higher ed. before we start slinging it at the hill, i say we need to take a hard look at ourselves, because the politics we bring to this conversation, you know, a lot of this conversation is driven by elite institutions that want to maintain their status, their lion's share of the funding, their selectivity and their ability to attract resources toward middle income and upper income students. and i think that danny made that point in husband paper, and it's -- in his paper, and it's true. we've seen a shift in higher ed policy since the '60s where more and more dollars are being directed to lower income and middle income students so they can have choice. so we have upper income students a policy that drives choice. we want to be able to give you the loan money you need to pick the colle

one is what institutional discounts are, and the other is institutional support. and they've kind of been used interchangeably. but in terms of the proposal on the table, that's really more on moving back, i'll say, to a much more institution-based support program. and changing the mix between vouchers and what institutions get. my view is vouchers are still the right way to go. i mean, i would be glad to argue that if you had a system in which the states set reasonable levels of tuition for public institutions, i would say based on general economic measures and essentially you have a voucher system to make sure that people who can't pay those reasonable prices have a chance to go to school, that that's superior to sort of shifting the whole thing around in terms of giving institutional support. so i would say let's get the voucher -- let's redesign or let's tweak the vouchers so they work better which they don't work well, they're not well targeted, etc., etc. rather than just say, okay, let's throw it all out and go this way and rely on institutional behavior wh

that's assuredly the most important institution, our educational institution.that's why social mobility is declining. it's by some measures lower now in the u.s. than in the u.k.! and i come from a country which used to pride itself on its ridge jid class system. guess what? the american class system may now be more rigid than the british. >> rose: and we're going to talk about this later in the program but we now know that in an interesting way most economies are prospering because of what's happening in urban areas. that's where innovation is, talent is, and that's where -- >> and it raises productivity just moving people to cities because the networks are there. the chinese understand it. >> rose: they make commitments to it that are interesting. there are serious government commitments. that doesn't mean the government is going to do it, they make a commitment to do it. >> i'm going to be careful here because you called them my friends and that's not accurate. >> rose: but you have been arguing how they will prevail >> i haven't made that point. civilizatio

institution. during the five year resolution to this does not have to pay taxes of any kind to any government entity or got to us this looks, sounds and tastes like a taxpayer bailout, just hidden behind a big of a difficult language of section 210 of title ii. i will stop there, mr. chairman. i would say after covering of title ii to us with all due respect to those that would argue otherwise, this is basically a rob peter to pay paul chain of events with taxpayer playing the role of peter. and we have made a proposal that would amend and summarize and semper fi dodd-frank. i was just the one thing in conclusion. despite its a fortnight page prescription, it is thus far more 9000 pages of regulations that this very committee estimates will take 24,180,856 hours each year to comply with. market is still lacking as it was during the last financial crisis, and we need to improve upon dodd-frank. thank you, mr. chairman. >> the chair now recognizes mr. lacker. >> thank you, mr. chairman, ranking memb

affiliate of the institution? >> the -- i'm not sure what the servicer portfolios, the delinquency rates there. what i quoted you is what's on book. >> mr. vermilyea, how about the service of portfolios? since the holding company, presumably a holding company subsidiary, are you noticing high levels of default or high levels of modification? >> that data that we have is very similar to that cited by colleague from the occ. we don't have data that distinguishes the delinquency and default rate for loans where the servicer is separate. we can follow up on that. >> please do so. but i, again, i just want to confirm, mr. chopra, from your perspective your point was that you're not seeing the kind of modifications numbers that would follow from the loan crisis that you're seeing in terms of delinquencies, is that a fair statement? i don't want to -- >> the, there's, of course, usages of forbearance as the other panelists have mentioned, but i don't think there's a significant amount of concessions given by lenders appr

institution in our community.e we voted before we had the right to vote. it's where we owned property when we couldn't own property. it's where we chose our own leaders. and to the professor's point, black churches today generally no longer have the central kind of influence in america at large or african-american communities in particular that it once had. and i think therefore this conversation is critical, because in christian theology, res resurection follows death. >> we begin to talk about the role of the black churches in the very life of communities. we need to understand that african-american communities are dynamic, that they're complex, and that that complexity reflects in very interesting ways the material conditions under which black folk are -- >> well but i mean jay-z is not representative of an institution. barack obama is catching hell today -- >> it's not an institution? >> it's not a viable and it's not an institution that's capable of producing anything. [ overlapping speakers >> some would arg

, the institutions that you are in charge of. so i'm here to just be a part of this experience, to welcome mr. bailey but to also know that your mayor is looking out and being a part of this institution and i want you to know that i am very happy to be a part of the boards effort and staff's effort to continue this great institution and all the wonderful work you do. it's my pleasure to be here and we'll continue to make all the success it has been for many many decades. thank you very much. [ applause ] >> well, thank you very much. i'm also very happy to say that on march 12th, we had our millionth visitor of our fiscal year that doesn't finish until june 30. i think we'll have another record breaking year. all of our wonderful shows this year and exhibitions are doing very very well. so a week ago wednesday, we had over 13,000 visitors in this museum. so we are really on a roll as the mayor said and we look forward to many many more successes and with collin as our new leader, i know he's going to come up with some wonderful e

and all of the public authority and the institutional meaning that has surrounded marriages in the institution get to find a way, and instead which is have private relationships between people. and so that is one of the ways that, and also it wouldn't just be for gay and lesbian couples because the requirement, the demand is to change the meaning for everyone. second lien it would explicitly sever the link between children and marriage. we don't have a procreation license, all very clever but the point behind it is not funny at all. the point behind is the court's argument to say that oh, yeah, right wingers and homophobes, they all used to save some american and children went together, but not anymore. now we don't have her creation licenses. what this tells me as someone who studied marriage for 20 years is that the basic concept of marriage which is to bring together the male and enough to make the next generation to make sure that they will be there to raise that generation. that's what's being kind of laughed at and put down and sneered at and say no, that's no longer it. that is, that de

you learned the rhythms of institution. it's not governed by rules per se but rather the willingness of 100 people to sit together to try and achieve some common point of view and then drive effectively to get the. the last few weeks i was in the senate there was a survey done, not for me, and asked members of the senate is the most partisan number of the senate and who's the most bipartisan member of the senate? i won both polls. [laughter] >> ago figure. >> and i don't object to the outcome in some ways because happened with some of the best senators historic were people who believed they did what they cared about. and willing to fight for but also smart enough to figure how to come to a compromise to get something done. so i know there's a temptation in these frustrations, with the nomination. i think you ought to look at who gets confirmation but i wonder whether chuck at senate confirmation of ambassadors and other things today. they can communicate with each other on cell phones minute by minute in the state departmen

>> of course the regulars will examine the institution or deal with the institution come into some more capital to keep it from failing and so forth spent does dodd-frank have any consequences for regulators if they choose incorrectly, or purpose would make a mistake speak is purposefully make a mistake speak with just if they make a mistake. we will just leave it at that. >> well, look, if it's a mistake its mistake unlike anything, that's what you have capital for our mistakes, management or otherwise. >> so i find the whole discussion that we're having today, we're going to great a regulatory agency that comes in and looks and determines if firms are qualified. but were going to turn that over to regulars. now keep in mind the regulars had been it for 10 years on bernie madoff that he was doing stuff but they turned a blind eye, and the courts found that the regulars could not be held accountable for the. they were shielded by the discretion of function exception, and the court did express, regrettable disdain or the actions, but nothing happened. now, so we are trying to decide on f

they are actually all one day that's what happened when we saw the crisis these institutions are one big conglomerate that think they control the world and they think they're above the law and they're not. what are the guys of the i.m.f. and world bank kind of looking back since you served so long into this institution what do you think about kind of what they present and sell themselves to be entire world i mean the whole structural draftsman policies keeping the third world perpetually in debt i mean to do that's just an entire ruse to maintain their profit structure i think these are institutions that if they are cleaned up can do a lot of good they can provide a basis for a peaceful transition it's very clear that we need we need to have some regularity in our international financial system we need to we what we certainly don't need is a currency war and that's what we're on track for unless and until we start to get to the bottom of this corruption and it's very simple actually to do because most of the people know that the corporate media seventy percent of the americans in a r

they are actually all one day that's what happened when we saw the library crisis these institutions are one big conglomerate that think they control the world and they think they're above the law and they're not. what are the guys of the i.m.f. and world bank kind of looking back since you served as so long into this institution what do you think about kind of what they present and sell themselves to be entire world i mean the whole structural drosnin policies keeping the third world perpetually in debt i mean dude that's just an entire ruse to maintain their profit structure i think these are institutions that if they're cleaned up can do a lot of good they can provide a basis for a peaceful transition it's very clear that we need we need to have some regularity in our international financial system we need to we what we certainly don't need is a currency war and that's what we're on track for unless and until we start to get to the bottom of this corruption and it's very simple actually to do because most of the people know that the corporate media seventy percent of the americans

the institution? because i think we can, we have enough people who have been through the system now who are far enough along in life that you could do a retrospective analysis to see what factors seem to be the most critical in determining outcomes. i think the other thing that nobody ever talks about is, we are not talking about building a car here. we are talking about human beings. and human beings are highly variable. people bring their own sets of issues and problems and assumptions and needs to college and i don't know that we can ever standardize for that because people are people. -- did her of a kid really dumb things. sometimes it works out really for them. >> sandy? >> i don't think the people who are saying we need more focus on research saying we don't have enough nudge to make we significance -- knowledge to make decisions, i think we don't have enough knowledge to make decisions likely to improve the performance of thecies tefment we can make decisions like lots of things we decide on e

, the getty conservation institute. so it was my great amazing experience in my career to be part of the team that opened the getty center in 1997 and also work on the getty villa which opened shortly thereafter. >> what a rich career you've had. and you most recently have come from where? >> so i moved with my family. my husband is an artist and we have two sons. we moved to toronto in 2006 after i had been for five years, the senior vice president at the cultural center in l.a. that was my first position in the jewish cultural world. i was recruited to be a director of an institution in toronto. >> what a fortunate, can we say -- that we all said yes to each other. >> i'm very happy to be back. i think my seven-year sojourn in toronto was very definitive in being ready to take on this position, the main reason being we were able to create out of a very small community center for the arts. what is now canada's only contemporary multicultural multidisciplinary cutting-edge cultural institution. >> i think that most peop

indisputable even if you look at primates in institutions human in apes they develop certain psychopath ologies that are fairy common i mean if you go across the street here there's a county run mental facility with human primates on a lot of medications but there's interesting differences are trying to get everyone out of that institution on heavy duty trucks and poly pharmacy and they don't have a lot of success many times people end up there because they want to be institutionalized they don't want to be dns to touche lies at that particular moment they're scared they're frightened they have no social support they don't know how to take care of themselves they realize that their psychiatric symptoms are overwhelming them but the whole push at those institutions is to get a medicated short term stay pharma mouth they have people checking in on them but not a lot of. socialists' not a lot of care of our pharmaceuticals maybe cash to survive in our economy and then you come across the street with your great apes and if they have psychological

my name is eric eisenberg, director of the institute for public knowledge on behalf of the institute of public knowledge and public books, which is are very new web review publication, we are delighted to be here for the launch and panel discussion of neil gross' new book, "why are professors liberal and why do conservatives care?" this is a topic of great sensitivity and interest to all of us here, but those of us who are interested in the politics of academia, where bradley turns out to be great difference of opinion as to simple things like whether in fact assessors are liberal and clearly there is disagreement about why professors have the kind of politics that they do have. neil comes to this is a partisan. he is not here to persuade you there's a right way the academy should be organized. he comes instead as a social scientist, really interested in trying to understand the situation and to explain how he got here as best he can. i am on record as having strong feelings on the book, so i should refrain myself from making strong editorial comment about it more than i said already

thank you very much. >> murase. >> we also vai presentation for representative from the institute. >> i also was not in the room for the vote. would you put down that i did this, thank you. >> >> okay, my name is greg martani and i have been before the board in other capacities with the japanese citizen's league. in this case i am filling in for karen who is the daughter of fred coramatzo who received the gold medal of freedom for his stand against the incarceration of japanese americans in world war ii. while this issue is something that can be discussed? a history class, i hope that this is something that can be looked at in a broader scope in terms of an individual who stood up for what he believed and for his stand against what recognized as being a wrong and instead of being bullied by the government he carried the case all the way to the supreme court. fortunately, war time prevailed and similar circumstances currently, his case was not viewed in the broader spectrum of whether it was constitutional just that he violated the curfew and therefore he was constricted and it was unt

congress is a reactive institution. typically reacts to the modern age, proposals from the executive branch rather than taking initiatives of its own. this is not what the founding fathers expected. it is not the normal procedure. i was naive about this. i expected dot and frank to be much more of the initiators then it turned out to be. dodd tried, and maybe he will tell us a little bit about this. initially he made quite a radical proposal, including abolishing all of the existing banking regulators and plumping them and so won regulatory agency. his colleagues, without exception, all dumped on these ideas. so he had to follow a frank's lead eventually and accept the administration's free-market as the template for reform. the pre-eminence of the executive branch, i realized, is made easier by the general decline of the expertise and policy experience in congress. the triumph of politics over policy as the great lee hamilton described to me. this started to happen in the early 1980's. by now the preeminent politics ov

and science education institutions around the world will benefit from the research and the innovation that will occur here. this has been a true journey, long, and rewarding. a culmination of years and planning and hard work, not just by the exporatorium staff and board, about whom i can't say enough. [ applause ] but also by the city and the state including many of you here today. the exporatorium is really all about collaboration. collaborativive learning, collaborative decision-making and collaborative management. and this process has been a true collaboration, bringing together the staff and the board, government agencies, neighborhood associations, our fellow san francisco museums and many other con stitcies. >> raising the money to turn this bold vision into a reality was a true labor of love for the board. two factors made our job actually quite easy. first, everyone in the bay area loves the exporatorium. [ applause ] and second, it is an institution that in its first 43 year has made a big impact in the world. what you see here is the end result of a lot of work by thousands

[speaker not understood], the institutions in the castro ncd has been introduced by supervisor scott wiener. afterward i will briefly summarize the proposal and the department's recommendation. [speaker not understood]. >> good afternoon, commissioners. andres power with scott wiener's office. he's at mta authority board. the legislation would authorize the planning commission to consider a larger use size than the castro street neighborhood commercial district than it would otherwise per milt. the legislation would provide a path forward for the aids foundation and their amazing project. as we all know, the hiv epidemic continues and is particular acute end up in the castro. and in light of the continuing federal cut to hiv funding which the supervisor is working kid gently to backfill, this project is really exciting and a welcome opportunity for the community. ~ this legislation would allow a larger use size to be considered fully by conditional use. currently this larger use size is not permitted. this authorization is carefully tailored and very limited in scope. so, for a large

the garden was one of the institutions that never tracked tenants. so for both the numbers i have are still missing the most of june we'll have over 4 hundred thousand residents that visited and close to a one hundred thousand non-residents and about over 5 thousand member scientists. so the attendance is pretty healthy and the revenue jarnts has grown every year. i appreciate the data you've provided and nick as well. like supervisor avalos well, i'll speak for myself i believe it should be a free venture but i understand the wreaking and park department efforts to create the highest quality quote/unquote whatever we call it. as some call it a tourist fee is make sense so we can bring in the income so it can be a great active place. almost all of the places around the city's are free >> all of them charge for both residents and non-residents. >> i do want to say there's some such a strong opinion that it's been a strong place for generations beginning are the non residents - but i understand your needs for balancing our budget but i think it should

>> when you work for an institution-- any institution, a company, a faculty-- you don't get to violate the rules of that institution and decide for your own self what you're going to do in a unilateral way that no one else can reverse. and that's what he did. so he betrayed the trust of the institution. he betrayed what creates a government which is being a civil servant, a servant to a larger cause and not going off on a unilateral thing because it makes you feel grandiose. >> woodruff: so he should be prosecuted? >> well, obviously there's a calculation involved. he was willing to sacrifice what was according to all reports a six-figure income, a prestigious position. i mean, and he was willing to sacrifice that or trade it for making public -- i mean, you can call it narcissism but -- call it a martyr complex, but he did do this instead of, you know, leaking it out or whatever. all administrations hate leaks unless they look good by them. unless the leaks are made by them themselves. i mean this is -- but i just don't see -- john boehner calls him a traitor and dianne feinstein call

but the institution does not make them better over time. that is something we should fix. >> host: former secretary rice is said the state has pentagon envy. >> guest: what she meant is there is a defensiveness to the culture of the u.s. state department and my favorite example is secretary clintons and development to bit -- a video the first and the secretary of state had done it. once every four years look to set priorities. it was a good first term but it has a long meese to go and fill one way to tell that is secretary clinton opened dip by saying we set out to figure how to make ourselves better and the conclusion is if you only gave us more money and more people we could be better. so the addition of the pentagon from the state department is they get all the money they want to work the foreign service does is every bit as difficult or dangerous but everybody likes the military and no room for foreign policy. >> why don't people think about the state department? >> only 2 million americans avail themselves overseas every year. not the

now when i got the offer from the hoover institute which is no teaching i said "this is it." it is sad there are many people out there who may well have wanted to teach that the conditions of teaching within universities became such it was not worth it. >> host: what is one of those conditions that changed that turned you off? >> the attitude of the students the faculty and administration. which doesn't leave much else. [laughter] the students began to think that they showed up to class that the letter b was a constitutional right and students would say i'm a graduating senior and i said to believe in predestination? but they thought it was my responsibility to see that they graduated. i never took that you. >> host: and our guest dawn booktv on location a stanford university hoover institution talking with thomas sowell with his book "intellectuals and race." how many books have you written? >> guest: i have not counted. >> host: 25? >> guest: it may well be. >> host: as the fellow of public policy at the hoover institution what you do? >> guest: i was asked at once in a leg

it's amazing collections what we have makes this institution truly authentic. and the collects we have are authentic. we have long-standing education and connections with the philippines and others. which is by the way, we have bugs. we occur rat and store and share with our research partners more than 26 million specimens. we're also a major economic engine 3 helps fuel the city and county of san francisco in the boarder region. first, we have 6 hundred on the other hand, and thirty employees. recently we were curious about your direct impact and we had a study done. they found that the direct thing to the city and county of san francisco is $122 million and another $46 million to the other counties. but we were even more surprised and impressed by how much direct revenue we bring to the city and businesses know that the binder that was given to us it's really worth a look to study the impacts. >> now let's turn to the timely project of the cities budget. as i members of the jury, we're not a department. our partnership is to pay the funds of the continuance o

disruptions of institutions throughout the state. disobeying orders from staff, non-receptiveness to the correctional process as a whole. >> the 1,100 inmates in santa rosa's close management unit represent more than a third of the prison's population. they all live under the middle east restrictive conditions, and some handle it better than others. a medical emergency on the unit has required correction staff to respond in hazmat suits. >> let's go! >> moments earlier, an inmate was discovered bleeding heavily in his cell. apparently from self-inflicted wound. >> come on. let's go. >> the inmate now escorted to medical is armando doctor. serving 15 years for aggravated assault with a weapon, doctor has been known to cut himself when under stress. >> out of the way. >> out of the way. >> watch your head. >> close the door. >> over here. close the door. >> slow down. we -- get your foot down. >> a security check. everything was fine in here. about 10:15, 10:20 we heard yelling, commotion. i stepped in to investigate the noise and foun

although an institution that ought to be good at its job and could be, with careful managerial attention, the main problem is even by their own description they're not hiring people that have the skills they say they need for contemporary diplomacy. they're not hiring the right people and as you pointed out they keep them and don't teach them anything in the meantime. the state department extend straining resources on teaching languages and yet of the jobs requiring language proficiency in the state department, a 25% by the state's own reckoning are filled by those to effectively cannot use the language and another 25 percent who are not easily proficient. they have a 50% failure rate by their own standard. in this whole area they expend training resources. it is not a good business model. >> host: why is a 50% failure rate? >> guest: though way the state department, there career progression is you take a diplomatic post, you are assigned one for a couple of years then after that, you go to language training then go someplace else. we developed a generalist enough for it -- foreign servi

. >> and with the ongoing support of these institutions and foundations. and... >> this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting. and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. >> ifill: it could be a breakthrough moment in the longest conflict in american history. u.s. and afghan peace negotiators are going to sit down with the militants who've been battling american troops since 2001. after 12 years of war, senior u.s. officials now say direct talks with the taliban are scheduled to begin within the next few days. the news came as president obama wound up a meeting with french with the at the g8 summit in northern ireland. the president said that the taliban must come prepared to make concessions. >> including the taliban is going to need to accept an afghan constitution that pronounces against violence is committed to protection of women and minorities. >> the taliban gave no indication whether it would accept those terms when the meetings begin in doha, qatar. instead the militants laid out separa

we support the republic and its institutions. they denounce it as if it were a regime, and that is a very grave confusion. >> he supports a constitutional monarchy akin to the british model. his movement goes back to supporters of the king who fought exactly for this during the french revolution. he thinks the system would work in today's world. >> we cannot compare the monarchies of today with the pre-18th-century monarchies. royal absolutism, which existed in france, changed into a different regime. that is what the revolution did. in many other countries, the monarchy provided the means to make the transition to democracy. >> but the monarchy the dream of would not need a parliament. they would really need a strong man to head. a dictator? >> this nothing to be worried about here the market ran for over 1000 years, and there was never a dictatorship. the king never had absolute power. i think hollande today has more power than louis xiv did. >> who else if not him? >> the royalists' probably posed little threat to francois hol

, and each institution has a security threat group coordinator assigned, which keeps up with and tracksnd monitors our gang activity within a facility that allows us to take proactive measures against those gang members. >> santa rosa security threat group coordinators knight and demerey. >> we're like hound dogs, we get a scent of something and don't want to leave it. it is very critical some of the things we have to go through. >> tower 45. >> when we go down there, inmates may call out our names. knight is here. demerey is here. >> you hear the toilets flushing. flushing contraband, marijuana, drugs, razor blades. anything they know that we're coming to find. >> they don't like to see us coming because we're thorough. >> our next target. we're going to ease over to delta dorm. we have a potential blood along with him, his roommate is roca moreno, alfredo iii. we'll get some documentation on him. document him, update him, photographs. >> today's targeted inmates are alfredo roca moreno, serving three life terms for murder, and bobby sandier, serving ten years for robbery with a deadly