are active on facebook, somehow instagram, twitter less discuss this decision of the institute of national remembrance, many people pogo'. with this conclusion, and with this decision, and a lot people do not, and in many posts i see, again, about these bans, people, well, either the representatives of the institute of national remembrance did not explain it well, or people did not read it, maybe we are reading from the headlines again, but it still seems to me that that this incredible sentiment is specifically for bulgakov, it was precisely developed during the times in the soviet union, when this writer... especially there in the late times was very supported, cultivated very much, you remember that there are also very popular tapes based on his works, it's not only a dog's heart, ivan vasyliovych is also changing it profession, many people don't know it because of bolgakov's play, and these films, these books are extremely widely cited, master margarita is widely cited, and this citation always adds to works of art on... nationalism and greater influence, and i i am very pleased that now ukrainian

much for your comments, we had volodymyr telishchak, the deputy head of the ukrainian institute of national remembrancehe air, we talked in particular about how the institute bans bolhakov, it's scary, well, i'll repeat it again, friends, you can treat - different, yes to this writer, but the institute of national remembrance did not ban mikhail bolgakov, it is you definitely need to know, you won't have any problems. books, it's just about renaming streets, for example, and something like that, so if you like the texts of this author, please, as before, you can continue reading him, and well, i think it's democratic enough in our case, well and regarding the bolgakovo museum, i personally would be very interested to go there and see how the concept of this will change. how it will be rebuilt, because there are really very interesting excursions there, if they remain as interesting, but become more objective, will tell more unpleasant truth about blogakov, i think that the museum will only win, and i also want to note an important point, it is about such an unbiased position and an unbiased vision, and

head of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance in 2014-2019, people's deputy of ukraine. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you. good day. mr. volodymyr, ot even today, after so many years after this terrible catastrophe, is it important to talk about these things, is it important to talk about... the truth that was hidden from us even in the times of the soviet union, and even very often, in fact, before the revolution dignity we are aware that many archives, many things were tried to be hidden even during, during independent ukraine, after the restoration of the independence of our state. undoubtedly, it is necessary to talk about it, because it seems to me that the chernobyl story is a story about how to hide the truth. can in literally costing people their lives, and this is the story of how the desire to hide the scale of this disaster resulted in people simply not being given the right information, and people who trusted the authorities, who believed that it was necessary to do what the authorities said , probably suffered the most, that is , it is a very instructive sto

was an expert commission that was created in accordance with this law at the ukrainian institute of national remembrancehich includes authoritative researchers, philologists, historians from... various scientific institutions from different regions of ukraine, they adopted , worked out and gave their expert opinion that bulgakov is subject, the figure of bulgakov belongs to the symbolism of russian imperial policy, since bolhak publicly called for ukraine in his works. phobia demonstrated and called for country phobia, and no one can argue with this, because in fact it is and it is subject to the limitations of the law, thus ukraine, on the basis of this expert opinion, the relevant bodies that are authorized to make decisions and will to make decisions about renaming there or removal of certain objects from the public space. dedicated, who bear the name of bolgakov. at the same time, this does not in any way concern the creative output, which remains and... remains open, accessible so that anyone who wants to can read, get to know, understand, analyze the work and character of bolgakov, so there is no

it is important to understand whether the institute of national remembrance is currently participating in this process, and briefly, if possible, what should it look like? well, actually, this is a question of preserving the memory of the russian-ukrainian war, preserving the memory of the heroic resistance to russian aggression, it is broader than just the routes, yes, so really on... kyiv region is working quite actively, and the community of kyiv region is working to preserve and perpetuate the memory, and the fact that, for example, last friday in irpin was opened such a wonderful carved monument of indomitability, yes, the volya monument is also a testimony to that kind of responsible work that is carried out in the kyiv region, including... as for the development of relevant memory routes, it cannot be one route, it can be completely different routes, but their purpose is precisely to honor the memory of the defenders, to honor of this feat of the residents of kyiv region, who stopped the advance of the russian aggressor, and commemoration of those victims who became those countr

thank you for joining our broadcast, anton drubovych, the head of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance and a serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine was a guest of svoboda ranok. we had time to talk about the situation at the front and general political military trends, the latest news, and about the ban on bulgakov , share your impressions and thoughts on this matter in the comments, subscribe to our channel and see you tomorrow, have a good day. the new metrolux mattress is made in ukraine with love for ukrainians. matroollyuks is one of the largest manufacturers of orthopedic mattresses and furniture. order the camel orthopedic mattress right now. together with the mattress, you get a 5-year warranty with co. nights of great sleep. dial the number you see at the bottom of the screen, and our consultants will help you choose the right size for your bed. this springless orthopedic mattress perfectly adapts to the shape and weight of your body. and that's not all. one side of the cover is made of camel wool. and the benefits of the dry heat it emits for the body is well known the who

prosecutor's office, that is , an element of the institution of national memory, well, it is quite difficult . and they, on behalf of the institute of national remembrance, discovered, admitted or clarified that they did not see the nature of the crime in what happened in 1947, which caused a gigantic storm in poland in the ukrainian community, and among polish researchers, polish experts, and i would told people who are a little more interested in polish-ukrainian relations, everyone admitted that this is a grenade thrown. on polish-ukrainian relations by the government, which is ending its own period of power, because it was a decision made on 20, essentially signed on november 24, made public on november 27 of last year, even when the minister of justice was zbigny zzobro, that is, the minister of justice of the previous government, and we remember the last months of the month, mr. myroslav 77. actually passes since the beginning of this operation, it was precisely april 28, why we are talking about this today, in 1947 they started this operation, almost 150,000 ukrainians living in their ethnic lands suffered, became victims of this operation, is th

of the chernobyl disaster was under the auspices, under the auspices of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance these, these archives were published, one of the books was published, in which contained very... a lot of information that i read even in 2019, please tell me why until now, until 2004, and then during yanukovych's time, in fact, they tried to hide information about the chernobyl disaster, because, for example, the then under yanukovych, the head of the security service of ukraine , khoroshkovsky, he essentially removed it from the website of the service, and under yushchenko, we remember that in... the archives were opened for the first time, people got access for the first time, scientists got access, why even yanukovych's government tried to hide this information, i think they are not only hid information about chernobyl, about the consequences of chernobyl, the consequences of the disaster, because it was already more or less known, in particular from some foreign publications, they actually hid kgb documents, because they were documents that contained information about hidden. in

chernobyl disaster, was under the auspices, under the auspices the ukrainian institute of national remembrance published these archives, one of the books was published, which contained a lot of information, which i read even in 2019, please tell me why until now , before 2004, and then and during yanukovych's time, they essentially tried to hide information about the chernobyl disaster? because, for example, khoroshkovsky, the then head of the security service of ukraine under yanukovych, he removed it from the website of the service, and under yushchenko we remember that for the first time archives were opened, for the first time people received access, scientists got access, why even yanukovych's government tried to hide this information, i think that they hid not so much information about chernobyl, about the consequences of chernobyl, the consequences. disaster, because, uh, it was already more or less known, in particular from some foreign publications, they were hiding kgb documents, because they were documents that contained information about hidden information, about methods of hiding

actually... asked this question in the survey, the expert commission of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance recognized it as propaganda of russian imperial policy installation of monuments in honor of bulgakov and the use of his name. in the names of institutions and geographical objects. according to the conclusion of this commission , bulgakov was an imperialist in outlook and an ardent ukrainophobe. at the same time, the head of this institute of national remembrance, anton drobovych , called the experts' conclusion a little emotional, but admitted that they called a spade a spade. according to him, the bulgakov museum in kyiv will continue to exist, but its name will be changed. here. do you, gentlemen, agree with this conclusion of this institute, the ukrainian institute of national memory, and whether or not everything that connects us or once connected us with russia, with everything that made us kindred, that made us a community of some kind should be taken and... thrown aside and talked about the fact that we will somehow continue without bulgakov, because bulgakov was an emperor.

the expert commission of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance, which includes historians anded on... the complete dismantling of the arch, which is best known as the arch of friendship of peoples, in the center of kyiv. despite the renaming of the monument at the beginning of the great war to the arch of freedom of the ukrainian people, it will continue to be associated with the soviet era. the arch was built in 1982 for the 60th anniversary the creation of the ussr and the anniversary of the october revolution of 1917. the arch of friendship of peoples symbolized the alleged eternal desire of ukraine to unite. with russia. earlier, at the foot of the arch, the statues of two proletarians, ukrainian and russian, were dismantled, but the composition dedicated to the pereyaslav council of 1654 was preserved. now the commission of the institute of national remembrance recommends the complete dismantling of the arch. we asked passers-by near this monument, what do they think about the dismantling? today , this is yet another reminder of what we have powerful and strong. an enemy,

let me remind you once again that the institute of national remembrance recognized him as a russian imperialist well, the argumentation is familiar to us, his work called "i am white" is often cited. he is enough like that. well, not unfriendly to the ukrainian nation, let's say so, well, and the days of the turbines, of course, and the white guard are remembered by the ossetians, probably the most remembered is this whole quote and in particular the film, where one is outraged, how ukrainians switched to the ukrainian language, how it is, there are no words we normal, how will the cat be, how will the whale be, well , you know all this, but i will say that the epic with bulgakov did not last... once, first of all, in 2021, i dare to say that shit, because the idea that bulgakov and boris okunin were banned on the network, that the books were banned, you see, they keep saying this, everything was banned, then it turned out that there was no ban at all, it was simply a matter of restricting imports from russia works of akunin and bulgakov and. then not all, but only some editions with prefaces,

look, on the website of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance there are statistics and the number of those streets and towns that were renamed during the full-scale invasion of russia, and it is about 10 thousand, plus monuments that were... deprived of them and the status of a monument , and they were also sent to museums there, or demolished, it is about 200, and this is also quite such a huge number in this period, but in general, if we talk to you, then we have a very large number of such streets, only more, we know that there is a bugakawa museum in kyiv , who was outspoken. a chauvinist, a ukrainophobe, and today we have, excuse me, in the heart of the capital on andriivskyi street, number 13 on andriivskyi zvoza, it was the former house of vasyl lastovnychy, it was a very famous architect, and the bulgakov family simply rented an apartment there, and they did not at all had nothing to do with ukraine, they are ethnic russians and his father brought him up more. of russian priests, he was a teacher at that time, and he brought up the russian church in particular, and w

listen, now anton rubovych , the director of the institute of national remembrance, will tell you that bulgakov, and here he is not telling you, what is it, that he should be included in the bestiary on the list, in the bestiary of criminals, but he says that we should and should only talk about bulgakov. in kyiv, because if he sinned in any way, yes, then he sinned here, don't you think that bulgakov is such a character that he should be included in this list? no, bulgakov is obviously not our character. bulgakov - this is exactly why i said that we need to de-imperialize our consciousness and our culture. bulgakov is an emperor. the most important thing, as far as i'm concerned, is if take his portrait, this is an imperial writer, and, and, and we are not an empire. and, we, we, don't claim to be an empire, we claim to be a liberal democracy, i hope so, after all, well, that's how i see our country and what we're fighting for in the end, but we don't want to to be neither... part of an empire nor the center of an empire. bulgakov is an imperialist, bulgakov is a xenophobe, he is not

listen, anton rubovych , the director of the institute of national remembrance, will now tell you thatis bulgakov, and here he is, actually, he does not tell you what he is, that he should be included in the bestiary of the list, in the bestiary of criminals, but he says that we need and should only talk about bulgakov. in kyiv, because if he sinned in any way, yes, then he sinned here. do n't you think that bulgakov is such a character that he should be included in this list? no, bulgakov is obviously not our character. bulgakov - that's exactly why i said, said that we need to de-imperialize our consciousness, our culture. bulgakov is an emperor, the most important thing, as far as i am concerned, if you take his portrait, he is an imperial writer, and, and... we are not an empire and we do not claim to be an empire, we claim to be liberal democracy, i hope so, after all, well, this is how i see our country and what the struggle is for, in the end, but we do not want to be either part of the empire or the center of the empire, bulgakov the emperor, bulgakov a xenophobe, he is not jus

the institute of national remembrance of ukraine declared the use of mikhail bulgakov’s name as propaganda according to the conclusion of experts, he was ideologically in the position of russian imperialism, white guardism, and approved of the expansion of russian communism. quite a motley worldview, i must say. but most importantly, bulgakov, of all the russian writers of that time, stands closest to to the current ideologists putinism. mikhailach really did not like ukrainian nationalism. in this, the kiev institute is absolutely right. we won't argue with the ratings. bulgakov himself most likely would not have done it either, if only for the reason that, based on the example of his own very tragic life, he knew very well that assessments change very quickly, sometimes diametrically, but manuscripts do not burn. this was an international review, see you later. pain in the knee, pain in the back, pain in the neck maybe. fintalgin extragel contains the maximum dose of a substance for pain and inflammation. pentalgin extragel. are you sure that you chose me yourself, or listened to a fashi

of the bulgakov museum in kiev, they say that the judgments of the commission of the institute of national remembrancerly categorical, fight first with bulgakov, then before with pushkin, now with sikorsky, and you know, here the most paradoxical thing the fact that many of the people listed, well , absolutely everything, they were not enemies of the young russians, they did not experience any absolutely... negativity towards this territory, yes, and moreover, all these people are the heritage of world culture, mind you, in our country now relations with the collective west are strained , it’s simply impossible, but for some reason it doesn’t occur to anyone to suggest, it’s even funny for me to say this, to demolish the monument to himinguey in the ryazan city of sasovo, for some reason it doesn’t come to mind, because himinguey is a world heritage. red-hot with iron, everything connected with russia, in kiev, for example, tchaikovsky street, has either already been renamed, or is about to be renamed noland street, but it’s not for nothing that the woman was handing out cookies on the maidan, there a

why you survey actually asked this question, the expert commission of the ukrainian institute of national remembranceognized the establishment of monuments in honor of bulgakov and the use of his name in the names of institutions and geographical objects as propaganda of the russian imperial policy. according to the conclusion of this commission, bulgakov was an imperialist in outlook and an ardent supporter of ukraine. phobe, while the head of this institute of national memory, anton drobovich, called the experts' conclusion a bit emotional, but admitted that they called things by their names, according to him in other words, the bulgakov museum in kyiv will continue to exist, but its name will be changed. do you, gentlemen, agree with this conclusion of this institute, the ukrainian, ukrainian institute of national memory and... and whether or not everything that connects us is necessary or once connected us with russia with something that is native to us. that we were being taken as a collective and thrown aside and told that we would somehow be without bulgakov, because bulgakov was an emperor. a

you actually asked this question in the survey, the expert commission of the ukrainian institute of national remembrance recognized the establishment of monuments as propaganda of the russian imperial policy in honor of bulgakov and the use of his name in the names of institutions and geographical objects, according to this conclusion. mr. bulgakov was an imperialist in outlook and an ardent ukrainophobe, and at the same time he was the head of this national institution anton drobovich called the conclusion of three experts. emotional, but admitted that they called a spade a spade, according to him, the bulgakov museum in kyiv will continue to exist, but its name will be changed, gentlemen, do you agree with this conclusion of this institute, the ukrainian, ukrainian institute of national memory, and is it necessary to take everything that connects us or once connected us with... russia, with everything that made us kindred, that made us a community somehow there, and throw it aside and talk about what's next for us we will somehow be without bulgakov, because bulgakov was an emperor. andrei, well, in t

according to the data of the institute of national remembrance, 3/4 of the territory of europe was contaminated with radioactive cesium at that time. millions of ukrainians and residents of neighboring countries received significant doses of radiation. what the liquidators remember 38 years later and why the radiation threat from... is relevant again, we look further in the story of yaroslav hopatsa. it happened 38 years ago the biggest man-made disaster of the 20th century, the reactor exploded. of the fourth power unit of the chernobyl nuclear power plant. he was called the youngest and most modern. however, after april 26, it became deadly and showed what the soviet reality really was, because the authorities at that time did everything to hide the consequences of the disaster. according to historian anatoliy bondar, for several days the world knew nothing about the explosion, a sharp increase in the radiation background was recorded in denmark and sweden, and moscow was asked. to give an explanation, instead there to show the world that they say nothing it happened, thousands of people, inc

conclusion, in short, our audience, i think , they know the conclusion of the ukrainian institute of national remembranceding bulgakov, where he is actually recognized a symbol of russkogomir, yes, but also this, but that's not all, this week there is another statement by mr. serhiy shafir, who says that it is necessary to be friends with russia, that it is necessary... and here we are talking about that certain voices are really beginning to appear, either from abroad of people who lived here in ukraine, or even from our own... who, in fact, are still trying to cling to some rope of this russian world and still involve the country in this cultural, historical, linguistic context. what should we do here, how, what is the way out we have to look, as a state, in order not to return, actually, at least even by some percentage to this context of the russian world, to which, unfortunately, a lot of people, despite the war, would like to return us. do you know what surprised me in this discussion about mykhailo bolgakov? because this is a conversation about cold and wet. some say that we don't need bolgakov be

why does he trigger so much, why are there such storms, now was the conclusion of the institute of national remembrance inadmissibility of glorification, the screeching started again, as you say, the bulgakov museum immediately reacted, immediately all the networks, this one this one. this document could have provoked, i read it before going on the air, it is written in terrible language, such kandov, the conclusion of the institute of national memory, that is, according to ... with which i agree, but how it is done and in the same place mostly the reaction, how it is done, but also the answer of the museum, you can find many internal contradictions there, i say again, we are a democratic country, despite the terrible war that russia is waging against us, and which russia is leading against us, and we cannot ban writers, the question is not whether we banned bolgakov or not, we are not going to come to private libraries and withdraw these books, are we? to burn the books of russian writers in the squares, as they do with ukrainian literature, like real nazis. the question is not that, the question is t

this city. was once home to 70,000 people, the institute of national remembrance says that you can understandm the video and photos that there is almost no surviving house left in bakhmut, this city also experienced... the revolution of the 17th year of the ukrainian revolution, this city suffered and its surroundings, the city of the ukrainian holodomor 2 1933 places, this city suffered a period of great terror, suffered, there was accordingly persecution, there was a nazi occupation in this place, and yet, even after the nazi occupation, this city was less destroyed than it is now during the period of the russian invasion. where houses are destroyed, where life is destroyed by the complete absence of life. tens of meters of this land are taken away from you, your parents, and your children every day. what can you feel when a piece of flesh is constantly being cut off from you, what can you feel? you can feel not... hatred, pain, you can weaken, it hurts, well in a human way, it hurts when you are cut alive into pieces, and now ukraine continues to be cut alive into pieces, it is very diffic

the cooperation of the archives of the security service of ukraine and the ukrainian institute of national remembrance, these are wonderful documents, of which, for me personally, the most interesting documents are precisely those documents, not those that tell about what happened before... the accident, what happened during the accident, and what happened after the accident, that is, how purposefully the communist special services tried to restrain the spread of information and, on the contrary, launch some fakes that nothing terrible actually happened. very often, by the way, the methods that mr. volodymyr talks about, the actual concealment of information, are paralleled with similar methods during the implementation. to the soviet sea regime, for example, in one of your articles, more precisely one of your articles about chernobyl , it is called first information radiation, and then, yes, you actually analyzed in detail the extent to which this information blockade took place, that is, to what extent in every city, in every village, in kgb agents were actually operating on every street, gathering

to manipulate, the same with dovzhenko, listen, anton robovych, the director of the institute of national remembrancel you now that here's bulgakov and here... actually, he doesn't tell you what it is, that he should be included in the bestiary, on the list, in the bestiary of criminals, but he says that about bulgakov it is necessary and we should... talk only in in kyiv, because if he sinned in some way, yes, then he sinned here, didn't you do you think that bulgakov is such a character that he should be included in this list? no, bulgakov is obviously not our character, bulgakov precisely because i said that we need to de-imperialize our consciousness and our culture. bulgakov is an imperialist, the most important thing, as far as i'm concerned, is that if you take his portrait, he is an imperial writer, and yes, we are not an empire and we do not claim to be an empire, we claim to be liberal democracy, i hope so, after all, well, this is how i see our country and what we are fighting for after all, we don't want to be either a part of the empire or the center of the empire, bulgakov is an emperor

agreement was signed between the czech institute for the study of totalitarian regimes, which is... in fact, the czech counterpart of the institute of national remembrance09, and it actually concerned searching for the fate of repressed czechs and slovaks in the territory of soviet ukraine, actually what is preserved in our archives, and after that, in yanukovych's vision , the political situation changed in ukraine, then the situation changed in the czech republic, but actually a full-scale invasion paradoxically accelerated it. processes, and it became clear to us and our czech colleagues that we have to get together as much as possible and publish it, the book turned out in principle not so thin, in our country, in principle, all books turn out like this for some reason, but this is precisely because we want to to show that representation of archival documents that we keep in our archives, in fact, this book, like all our other books, is to some extent such an invitation to research, it is rather such an emphasis. on because actually, and when we talk about the repressions of the great terror of 37-38, if it was not obvious, but the czech minority wa

the ukrainian institute of national remembrance recognized the writer mikhail bulgakov as a ukrainophobethe use of his name as propaganda of russian imperial policy. this is reported on the institution’s website, although he was born there in kiev, they said there that he loved kiev so much, so for sure, kiev is a russian city, if we start digging there, it turns out that there was nothing ukrainian there at all, well , bulgakov was brought up in completely different traditions, they thought he was ukrainian, then they decided to close the museum, and now he is a ukrainophobe, that’s all - there were people there who read books, when they started reading bulgakov, they discovered a lot of amazing things for themselves, it turned out that bulgakov he very... strongly disliked this farmhouse nationalism and despised it, ridiculed it in every possible way, and naturally, these are these ukrainian nationalists, they were so offended that they gradually began to declare bulgakov an enemy of the ukrainian nation. there are some quotes just from this strange institute of national memory. mikhai

the institute of national remembrance called him a ukrainophobe for the imperials, and at the same times not any imperial writer, he was a writer, he was the keeper of the russian language. yes, in general, he was leaning towards that strongly. nevertheless, they took action and accused the experts of the institute of national memory of ukraine of incompetence, who, quote: attribute to bulgakov the views of his characters. in the context of the writer’s cancellation, another surname. taking into account sekorsky’s clear position, he should not be called a ukrainian either. although until now igor sekorsky, an aircraft designer, inventor, philosopher, was considered the hero of ukraine just as unconditionally as bulgakov. kiev airport, since 2018, is an air harbor . appropriated sekorsky, like bulgakov , simply by the fact of his birth in kiev, but sekorsky himself in the year thirty-six said this: my family is of purely ukrainian origin from a village in the kiev province, where my great-grandfather and great-great-grandfather were priests, however, we consider ourselves russian in orig

institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] thank you, mr. speaker. >> i think the government for the recent compensation. on the 12th of may, we will see the first ever national remembrance day. are we marking this occasion by laying a wreath of service being held at seaside by the memorial plaque which has the name of my late husband and unfortunately others on it. will the deputy prime minister and will he ask the premised are to mark this occasion by remembering those who have died, bring this important food source to our table? >> i know how important this is to the honorable lady and i'm sure she will be remembering her late husband neil on this day. it's important we all recognize the sacrifices made by fishermen and women to bring food to our tables. i know that mike kollek minister spencer -- i know that my colleague, minister spencer will be there on that day. >> the mayor is described as having given away the future of the region's children. he was responding to the 40% of 500 million pounds issued by the lord in a deal to to local business mates and forgive them who help the standard for local development. he describes it as unforgivable. they have sold the se

of remembrance of the victims of the katyn shooting is celebrated, and we will have roman podkur, candidate of historical sciences, senior researcher at the institute of history of the academy of sciences of the nationalcademy. ukrainian researcher of state terror in the ukrainian ssr. thank you, mr. roman, for being with us now, i once studied at the institute there as a graduate student. history for a long time, and it's always nice to see my colleagues, i was a bad graduate student, i'll admit it right away so that no one asks me awkward questions later, look, well, if you're studying it, then please tell me, well, just the other day i was re-watching this whole story about the katyn tragedy, not the fresh one from 10, but the one from 40, and if... there is a system of evidence, i would call it, i am not an investigator , but the system of evidence is final, it is not just that someone killed someone there, but there are documents, the business trip of these people led by blokhin, as far as i remember, the main, main shooter of the soviet union, the name is blokhin, how they went, where they stopped, and how much they were given nabo, that is, not there, you know, any court, any... well, maybe for