according to the international atomic energy agency iran is in compliance with the agreement signed during the obama administration donald trump knows this so why does he want to trash the agreement. now in gears yet on you know until you go into their version of those are the lowest in the world that is still. going to have a desire to they didn't intend to do that and then. you're. just to believe it is bush the glad i. got the time to remember the lessons nobody can take on that. got up out of the line down. in the state out be important yet and we're not. going to shoot me in the movies. in the future. you become worthless. still exist. ricos treated as one. of. the islanders controlled by the us government. crave independence. either. still many do wish to join the us hundreds more leave every day. with the country at a crossroads for the island is on the rise. just so. here's what people have been saying about rejected in the sixty's. the only show i go out of my way to. really packed a punch. is the john oliver of r t america is doing the same we are apparently better than. the c. p

according to the international atomic energy agency iran is in compliance with the agreement signed duringthe obama administration donald trump knows this so why does he want to trash the agreement. joining us here on our civilian casualties from airstrikes in afghanistan are up by more than fifty compared with just last year that's according to a report by the united nations assistance mission the u.n. also says more than two hundred sixty six thousand people have been displaced since january with many women and children having to stay in makeshift shelters. you know the. u.s. forces bombarded everyone including children men and women in the houses have been destroyed on to the children and women were wounded and killed there are no houses left. some homes were burned by islamic state militants and those were hit by u.s. drone strikes yet if you. look at the. junk food were thrown the fight that is ongoing islamic state militants came in started the clashes they would stick cars ahead self then u.s. troops bombed the area so we left and came only the houses were destroyed and now we're le

according to the international atomic energy agency iran is in compliance with the agreement signed during the obama administration donald trump knows this so why does he want to trash the agreement. welcome back washington is building up its troops near russia's western border a move that according to most violate they can't greymouth the country has with nato jacqueline very good joined me earlier to explain. on thursday the un us announced the presence of a second regiment in the already very tense baltic region and that's a move which moscow claims violates a fundamental peace treaty signed between russia and nato years ago and that was designed to end decades of cold war tensions which of course right now are again on the rise and the russian defense ministry spokesperson believes the additional deployment undermines russia's own security by surrounding it with hostile forces in country to the claims of nature and the u.s. only in significance of the troops approaching the russian border in fact now it's not a brigade but a u.s. mechanized military division so what's the pentagon's ex

according to the international atomic energy agency iran is in compliance with the agreement signed during the obama administration donald trump knows this so why does he want to trash the agreement. and then always gives yeah you know until you tell him to hurt you those are the you know mr world that it's going. to go in another place or through the permit do that then. you have. to go to war if you're. just to believe also all those glad i. got. the number. nobody can take on. my. mind i'm. not. going to run the truth. somewhere. u.s. president says he refuses to certify the iranian nuclear deal doesn't trump made that announcement while expanding his new strategy on iran his decision comes despite the global nuclear watchdog as well as u.s. and european officials all saying that tehran has been keeping its side of the bargain. based on the factual record i have put forward i am announcing today that we cannot and will not make this certification we will not continue down a path whose predictable conclusion is more violence more terror and the very real threat of iran's nuclear breakout

according to the international atomic energy agency iran is in compliance with the agreement signed during the obama administration donald trump knows this so why does he want to trash the agreement. i. love. all your. it's a good move for you. i played for many clubs over the years so i know the game inside. the ball isn't only about what happens on the pitch pull the funnel school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the superman each kill the narrowness and spending two hundred twenty million on one player. so it's an experience like nothing else not to because i want to share what i think of what i know about the beautiful game great so one more chance for. a nice minute. please. i'm lindsey francis is the boss broadcasting around the world from washington d.c. tonight cuba is set for even more sanctions from washington as relations between the two nations why we take a look at the island and its oil and what it means for its future also millennial are falling behind houses cars families these are hallmarks of adulthood in generations past we explore why these are harde

spirit of the agreement has iran actually violated the deal well according to the international atomic energy agency iran has complied with a number of requirements agreed upon in the final deal back in twenty fifteen iran shipped more than twelve tons of enriched uranium to russia thousands of centrifuges necessary to enrich uranium for an atomic bomb and to remove the core from the reactor at iraq facility by trump saying iran hasn't lived up to the spirit of the agreement he's most likely referring to the ballistic missile tests the country has conducted since agreeing to the deal the actions have been viewed by the us and the un as provocative and washington believes is in strict violation of the deal but now it is congress actually on board with scrapping the steel it's not middle of iran deal was never altogether popular in congress during the obama administration but it did have enough support to avoid a filibuster now the consensus here is that denying the deal when the international community says that iran is living up to it would be really bad for international relations even trying so in defe

the spirit of the agreement but has actually violated the deal no according to the international atomic energy agency iran has actually complied with a number of requirements that they agreed upon in the original deal back in two thousand and fifteen iran shifts more than twelve tons of enriched uranium to russia thousands of centrifuges necessary to enrich uranium for an atomic bomb and it removed the core from the reactor at iraq facility by trump saying iran hasn't lived up to the spirit of the agreement he's most likely referring to these numerous ballistic missile tests the country's conducted since agreeing to the deal the actions have been viewed by the u.s. in the united nations as provocative whereas washington believes it is in strict violation of the deal ok so it kind of allows for a little wiggle room there what does congress think about this is that on board no i mean there was never altogether popular in congress during the obama administration but it did have enough support to avoid a filibuster the consensus though right now is that in denying the deal when the international community is

iran nuclear deal is a milestone for nonproliferation and diplomacy according to the international atomic energy agency iran is in compliance with the agreement signed during the obama. administration donald trump knows this so why does he want to trash the agreement. cross talking the iran deal i'm joined by my guest. in pittsburgh he is a partner at global growth advisors international strategic consultancy group based in new york and in london we cross that he's an iran expert at middle east are generally across the uk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want i always appreciated in pittsburgh if i can go to you first here one of the things i'd like to focus on this program we know that i guess it's common knowledge now that donald trump is going to decertify this agreement. and looking at me in the mainstream media looking at all the cable stations it's remarkably low light on facts like for example the i.a.e.a. saying that iran is in compliance with this agreement but we hear about all this other stuff on the sides iran's behavior in the middle east in its other activities in the reg

according to the international atomic energy agency iran is in compliance with the agreement signed during the obama administration donald trump knows this so why does he want to trash the agreement. i'm now in there's no you know until you tell him to the other shows a little you know mr welch that it goes. to the other things i do that i didn't intend to do that then. you have. to go to war you know you really do believe all. the glad the police have got. the number the ones who nobody can take the one that. got up out of the line down. in the state at the impulse nguyen and he's not a bush he stumbled out of the. time when it. here's what people have been saying about rejected in the us it actually is full on . the only show i go out of my way to launch you know what it is that really packs a punch oh yeah it is the john oliver of march to you americans do the same we are virtually better than the food that you see people you've never heard of low or down to the night and president of the world playing so very. seriously send us an e-mail. claiming anywhere between three and four millio

the international atomic energy agency says iran stocks of heavy water used in some nuclear reactors try succeeded agreed limits under obama but now below that benchmark whether that is enough for donald trump only he knows. why. but. well we should know in just under an hour from now though for now though let us speculate with tyson from the aspen institute in berlin welcome to w. . the secretary or secretary of state rex tillerson has just said that the president will decertify the deal rather than leave it so explain to us what that means i mean basically this was a law passed by congress that required the president to certify that iran was in compliance with the deal every ninety days and that it remained in the united states' national interest to remain part of the steel if he does not certify that that allows congress to if it chooses fast track a certain suite of sanctions that do not require that can go directly to the floor and can override a filibuster so it basically kicks the ball to congress to take action so america's agreement to this deal was always conditional well t

international atomic energy agency in the framework of international treaties but if someday our interests are not realized and other parties want to violate their commitments they should be aware that iran will not hesitate a moment and will respond to them. that they want to. whether congress will make the changes trump wants remains to be seen it would seem that much of his bluster is for domestic consumption after weeks of divisions within the republican party and infighting among his aides the president is trying to reassert his campaign priorities and play to his support base. for more on this i'm joined now by our correspondent teresa tropper tree so you've been to iran six or seven times you cover the last election so let's dive in despite trump's announcement iranian president hassan rouhani says he wants to stick to the deal but is there a chance to iran could change its mind not right now for iranian strong speech was a major violation of the deal but he didn't say anything that is completely unacceptable for them for example you decertified it but you didn't pull out of it and he announced new sanctions against the revolutionary guards but he didn't label them a terror organi

monitoring mechanism to ensure that iran's nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only and she made the very important point that the i.a.e.a. the international atomic energy agency verified eight times that iran is in compliance with the deal so also listening to all of this is our diplomatic editor james bays and james it really was more than a response i suppose almost a direct rebuttal to president trump she hails this deal as being important and effective and basically through the use wholehearted support behind it. yeah very interesting that the decided to come out so quickly and so strongly she is the high representative of the european union for foreign policy that makes her the e.u. use top diplomat rarely have i heard an e.u. official come out with statements that were so tough so forthright possibly even you could say defiant remember of course though she had a key personal role in the iran deal there were six countries from the international community that were negotiating with iran the e.u. had the role and she had the role as the convener of those talks in fact we have the nobel peace prize announced about a week ago she didn't get it but she was we

then we have the abrogation of a deal where the verifying entity, the international atomic energy agency, continues to verify that irans doing the right thing, and we are still decertifying. it's fraught with problems. >> absolutely. the international atomic energy agency has certified compliance with the deal on eight separate occasions since it was inaugurated. leon panetta has this exactly right. in fact, i would go maybe a step further and say i think this is one of the most damaging decisions that donald trump has made since becoming president, because of the scope and the breadth of the impact that it will have, separating us from allies, strengthening hard-liners in iran, pushing our allies closer into positions with russia and china. at the same time, also creating conditions that will make it much more difficult, should we go into negotiations with north korea, to bring them along with any credibility on anything we agree on. so, across the board -- and you know, i think -- a thought i had tonight is i suspect most of his close advisers, secretary of defense, so forth. h.r. mcmaster, i suspect they generally

forces it's the second attack in the capital in just two weeks the head of the international atomic energy agency says iran is complying with the twenty fifty nuclear deal and so should everyone else who was visiting iran for the first time since the us president told congress it wasn't complying with the agreement saying bizarre the reports from. what would have been a routine visit by the head of the international atomic energy agency has taken on added significance. i am very happy. yukiya amano put a positive face on proceedings but the stakes are high it's his first trip since president donald trump told the u.s. congress iran is not complying with the terms of the nuclear deal or the joint comprehensive plan of action a claim a minor made clear is not true as of today i can state that you can get commitment did it commitments made by iran under way being implemented and the message that seemed tailor made for the u.s. president the most important thing is to be optional. i think always. since i became the director general of the day sometimes i had to report the bad news but i also reported good news

iran is in compliance with the deal. the international atomic energy agency has certified a number of times that iran is in compliance. the u.s. intelligence community agrees that iran is in compliance. even inside the white house a number of the president's own advisers are very much opposed the withdrawing from this deal because they believe, as john and i both do, that iran is in compliance with the deal. the voices against certification, the voices calling for the president to withdraw from the nuclear deal often state that they have very specific concerns about the deal; small technicalities, areas where they're not 100% sure if it's working out. and if any of you have any questions on those, i'm happy to talk about them in the q&a. but rather than actually talk in depth about the deal and its pros and cons right now, i want to move to the next step and talk a little about why the deal is still the best alternative for dealing with iran. and the debate that has happened inside the trump administration and with a number of outside voices in many ways echo

iran is in compliance with the deal. the international atomic energy agency has certified a number of times that iran is in compliance. the u.s. intelligence community agrees that iran is in compliance. even inside the white house a number of the president's own advisers are very much opposed the withdrawing from this deal because they believe, as john and i both do, that iran is in compliance with the deal. the voices against certification, the voices calling for the president to withdraw from the nuclear deal often state that they have very specific concerns about the deal; small technicalities, areas where they're not 100% sure if it's working out. and if any of you have any questions on those, i'm happy to talk about them in the q&a. but rather than actually talk in depth about the deal and its pros and cons right now, i want to move to the next step and talk a little about why the deal is still the best alternative for dealing with iran. and the debeat that has happened -- debate that has happened inside the trump administration and with a number of outs

iran's quest for nuclear weapons. despite the fact that the international atomic energy agency confirms that iran is honoring its nuclearommitments. trump claimed iran is violating the spirit of the agreement. >> while the united states adheres to our commitment under the deal, the iranian regime continues to fuel conflict, terror and turmoil throughout the middle east and beyond. importantly, iran is not living up to the spirit of the deal. >> france, germany and the united kingdom issued a joint statement criticizing the president's remarks. russia called it, quote, troubling but israel praised president trump's words as courageous. we should note, despite the president's rhetoric the deal is not dead yet. it falls to congress now to decide whether to attach new conditions to the agreement or to reimpose sanctions and end the deal. here is president trump after his announcement this afternoon. >> we're going to see what happens. we're going to see what they come back with. they may come back with something that's very satisfactory to me, and if they don't within a very short period of time, i'll terminate the deal. >>

if even the republican led house would vote in favor of killing the iran deal the fact that the u.s. international atomic energy agency has confirmed that iran is still complying with the deal could that maybe encourage the u.s. congress to vote in favor of maintaining the deal and therefore against trump. is carlina chinmoy there in washington will staying in the u.s. members of the los vegas police department have gathered to remember a police officer who was one of the people killed in the mass shooting on sunday charleston heart fields widow and their son and daughter were surrounded by several hundred people during the memorial part field was off duty tending the festival when he lost his life. the shooting left fifty eight people dead and many more wounded now even gun lobbyists in the us are calling for more regulation of a device used by the shooter that allows weapons to fire faster meanwhile investigators are still trying to understand what the shooter's motives were police say the las vegas shooter stephen paddick rented a room at his downtown hotel the ogden during a music festival last month called life i

iran has intimidated the i.a.e.a. so that the i.a.e.a. the international atomic energy agency does not request inspections of iranian military and military facilities that might be engaged in nuclear activities private in nuclear activities now we have to remember the iran nuclear deal stablished a broader mandate for the international atomic energy agency not just to visit declared nuclear facilities but also to conduct snap inspections of those facilities as well as iran's uranium mines its centrifuge manufacturing facilities and there have been some four hundred snap inspections conducted by the i.a.e.a. since the iran deal was implemented one and a half years ago. and what trump is alleging is that the i.a.e.a. has not exercised its full authority to conduct challenge inspections of certain facilities that the i.a.e.a. believes may be involved in. activities privative by the j.c.b. away weapons related activities. the i.a.e.a. said just the director general yukiya amano said in response to donald trump we have had the full authority and we have inspected the facilities tha

the international atomic energy agency says iran stocks of heavy water used in some nuclear reactors twice exceeded agreed limits under obama but are now below that benchmark whether that is enough for donald trump only he knows that if. that is the. well i was going to let all of us know sure there's a side that speech is due to happen in the next fifteen minutes or so likely to run late but as a side we'll bring it to you live but i don't let a speculate with tyson baka from the aspen institute here in the welcome let's talk about decertification right because this is what rex tillerson said is likely to happen that america will decertify the deal right explains well and so this is not we should say the u.s. pulling out of the deal it is a process that was required in the united states by congress it passed in in two thousand and fifteen which basically said that every ninety days the president is required to guarantee that two things are occurring one that this remains in the u.s. national interest and two that iran is fully complying with the agreement so far president trump has

trump administration begrudgingly certified iran has complied with its obligations under the agreement earlier this year, as has the international atomic energy agency. has also said he is in favor of sticking with the iran nuclear deal. president trump's potential sabotaging of the deal is only one of a growing number of nuclear threats under the trump administration. tensions have also risen sharply between the u.s. and north korea over its nuclear program. trump has repeatedly threatened to destroy all of north korean, a nation of 25 million people. after trump took office, the scientists behind the doomsday clock, which tracks the likelihood of nuclear war and other existential threats, moved the clock's minute hand 30 seconds closer to midnight. the clock is now the closest to midnight than at any time since 1953. we'll have more on the iran nuclear deal, the nobel peace prize, and the threats of nuclear war after headlines. meanwhile, president trump issued a cryptic threat thursday night during a meeting with military leaders at the oval office, saying this is the "the calm before the storm." pres. trump: do you know what this represents? may

iran's government and its pursuit of death. and destruction. if trump refuses to give his seal of approval of the members of the agreement via a could fall apart. the international atomic energy agency have no doubts that iran is complying with the requirements. trump has never officially said that iran isn't complying with the terms but has been an advocate of taking a much tougher stance on tape around. the president's is required to certify the deal everery ninety days if he doesn't stanislaw to congress to decide what to do next. renew sanctions or malls the international community has condemned this latest twist russia and the eu said they hope this will not affect the deal. whereas iran has said the agreement is not renegotiate both. turning now to spain which is expressed regret over a violent police crackdown on catalan is independence referendum. the apology comes days after spanish police seized ballot boxes and dragged and beat people are preparing stations. injuring some nine hundred didn't mean ball the catalan government says it how submitted the final results of the disputed vote. to its original parlament. an apology from the spanish states to those injured during po

the international atomic energy agency has verified eight times that iran is implementing all its nuclearts following a comprehensive and strict monitoring system. there have been no violations of any of the commitments included in the agreement. barbara, we are starting to get the impression that there is a lot of placating taking place of iran. heads of state, heads of organisations. we have just heads of state, heads of organisations. we havejust heard from emmanuel macron, saying he will be sending his foreign minister to iran shortly, to tehran, shortly. could this possibly backfire on mr trump? we'll have to wait and see, these are really uncertain times but that was one of the concerns of those who advised him not to withdraw from the deal completely and those who were also concerned about this step of him not certifying the deal and trying to tinker with it again and reopen some of the issues he feels aren't working. they felt that the americans would be isolated, that there would be a wedge between them and their allies and that their credibility would suffer, so those are all co

international nuclear watchdog i and the european union that they're quite satisfied with how iran is dealing with the deal. since we reached a deal two years ago the international atomic energy agency has been monitoring the implementation of the deal including with inspections and it has certified iran's to compliance eight times we have an interest and the responsibility a duty to preserve the nuclear deal with iran the international community has been concerned about iran's nuclear program for years and for decades it has been just simply impossible to reach any agreement that is why what happened in two thousand and fifteen when five countries russia france britain germany and china together with iran and reached a deal supposed to curb the country's nuclear program it was taken by many as a break for as a he story glenn mark agreement and this is why it's clear what many are suspecting us to pull out of the accord later this week frustration and theories are very high to make to you david as artie's marie international in berlin thank you very much indeed thank you. well germany's chief diplomat also stressed withdrawing from the nuclear deal with iran would hinder the chances

grade plutonium and all this will be closely monitored by the international atomic energy agency well in return for it all economic sanctions on iran were left it let's talk a little bit more about this with scott lucas he is an american studies professor at the university of burnham and he joins right now yes there is that there is so much a professor for joining us it's really really difficult to tell whether all the tough talk coming out of washington is real because on the one hand you've got president trump repeatedly saying that you know iran broke the deal the spirit of the deal but the i.a.e.a. says no they're complying and congress also agree with iran complying with the terms of agreement and then we've had today right before coming on air the new york times reporting that the u.s. will keep the deal so is this just all part of the art of the deal. ok well it's donald trump who wants to leave the deal getting to stage an appearance where he waves his fist furiously but it's a very small stick because his top advisors are telling him that the u.s. needs to remain in the deal for the sake of relations with european partners

iran's nuclear program is not diverted from military purposes. the jcpoa was unanimously endorsed by the u.n. security council in resolution 2231. the international atomic energy agency has repeatedly con firmds iran's compliance with the jcpoa through the long-term verification and monitoring program. therefore, we encourage the u.s. administration and congress to consider the implications to the security of the u.s. and its allies before taking any steps that might undermine the jcpoa, such as reimposing sanctioning on iran lifted under the agreement. bill richardson, what do you think? >> well, i think this is very bad national security policy. the practical effect is that iran is going to enrich uranium and build nuclear weapons. now we're going to have north korea and iran, two rogue nations with nuclear weapons. north korea already had them. secondly, we've angered our allies. this is our cornerstone, european union, france, britain, germany, russia, china are also signatories. the agreement is basically nullified because we're the big fish in this operation. thirdly, we're going to lose leverage over iran where we want to have leverage on them. we want them to

sanctions if iran violates the deal to get rid of the sunset provisions because eight years into jcp, the penalties begin to sunset. would also bolster the international atomic energy agency's verification process and overseeing iran's nuclear programs and limit their development of advanced centrifuges. that addresses only the jcp. it doesn't address the broader set of parameters at the president is going to talk about at 12:45. congress doesn't know everything that the president is going to propose and can't react to it just yet. we'll see what he has to say as far as how far he wants congress to go to wrap all of this together so that if iran continues to engage in bad behavior, to stabilize and destabilizing activities in the middle east, it would result in the imposition of u.s. sanctions. after how much of an appetite there is in congress for that, but we will see. >> sandra: john roberts live in the white house for us. meanwhile, we await the announcement. what you think we will hear from the president? >> newt: and think the administration understands that iran has been our mortal enemy. just a few weeks ago, the iranian parliament was adopting the new military bill

iran has multiple violations, true or false? >> not really, fred, and the most important thing is, even his own advisers in the united states and the international atomic energy agencyid that iran has been in compliance. there were a couple times there were small infractions on technical things like heavy water, iran crept a little bit past the amount that they were supposed to have, the iaea talked to them about it, and they quickly went back. one of the main things president trump has talked about is iran's ballistic missile test. this was not addressed in the deal, it was enshrined in the u.n. security council resolution that endorsed the deal. the main thing is that the whole international community. the iaea and even the united states and all of its partners in the deal, say that iran is in compliance. the u.s. is calling it tactical compliance. meaning they have to do what they have to do to get past launching a nuclear weapon. as so far as the deal is concerned, iran is complying. >> other countries are ememployering the u.s. not to impose any changes. if that were the case, it would be the u.s. that would breach the deal. >> that's right, if the u.s. breache