north korea. uk fears iran's hand in north korea. uk fears iran's hand in north korea's form, this isn't news, is it? there is a lot of question about how they get all the makings of them won. irony don't know what

except that was iran iraq and north korea this time around it's iran north korea and islamic fundamentalists all right good to have your thoughts thanks so much thank you. well after weeks of condemnation mammals leader has finally made her first national speech on the vine is against her hand to muslims in her country over the past three weeks more than four hundred thousand ranger have escaped on rests which was sparked by a military crackdown and a kind states spotlight reports now from capitol hill after intense pressure on song suchi finally address the real hinge or refugee crisis but in here most anticipated speech since becoming myanmar's leader she avoided criticizing the actions of the military something the u.n. calls textbook ethnic cleansing. it is not the intention of the government to apportion blame to gauge responsibility we condemn all human rights and for violence we are committed to the restoration of stability and rule of law throughout the states her address lacked the specifics on how to end or even the unfolding revenger refugee crisis on her country's border with ban

it's time for "andrea mitchell reports." >>> president trump taking a hard line against both north korea and iranthe united states has great strength and patience. but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy north korea. rocket man is on a suicide mission for himself and for his regime. the iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the united states has ever entered into. frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the united states, and i don't think you've heard the last of it, believe me. >> coming up here, nbc news nightly news anchor lester holt who just sat down with iran's president rouhani. our first look at lester's interview.

north korea. uk fears iran's hand in north korea. his isn't news, is it? there is a lot of question about how they get all the makings of them won. irony don't know what this is about, in the sense of the iranian applications of this. but i do think that north korea and its potential nuclear bomb is a very serious issue. you just cannot take this too tightly at all. my worry is, and! this too tightly at all. my worry is, and i suspect yasmin agrees with me, is that when you have not a cystic and unreliable person like donald trump as the president of the us knighted states, and this extraordinary man in north korea, kim jong—il, every time extraordinary man in north korea, kimjong—il, every time i read extraordinary man in north korea, kim jong—il, every time i read about this, i shudder. i think turning on iran and making new enemies, this is not the time. i think newspapers should be more a careful not to ignite fires in places where fires aren't at the moment. very quickly, turning back to the observer, a very quick summary, please

is confronting north korea top of the pile the issue of iran all of these problems that the trumpet ministration has struggled to come to a clear policy in dealing with particularly that of north korea he has been attempting to involve the chinese in exercising greater pressure on north korea to end their missile testing on the issue of iran there have been discussions are ready with the israeli prime minister we must wait and see whether he is going to continue to exercise the iran deal which is due for renewal within the next few weeks so all of these issues are ones that he's likely to focus on but what will be important is the tone of that speech in the united nations is it going to be a president once again who is sharply criticized the backdrop to the speakers during their addresses critical of the united nations or is it going to be a president seeking unity rather than confrontation attempting to get his foreign policy objectives and his america's first slogan through cooperation through working with other u.n. member states these are critical questions that we all know by the end of his

at the top of the president's list is discussing north korea and iran. north korea has been defiant - with repeated missile launches despite the u-n handing down it's toughest sanctions to date. president trump assembly today with a meeting on the united nations reform. he will then meet with leaders of france and israle before hosting a dinner with latin american leaders. new this morning - d.c. public schools having a moment in the spotlight. the school system - becoming a star overnight - after a mention during the emmys by a famous former student. john gonzalez is live in northwest. 5 xxxx redskins fans waking up winners washington notched their first victory of the season. the skins offense seemed to finally get clicking on the road against the l-a rams. in the second quarter chris thompson gets the handoff from kirk cousins and he does all the rest. he outruns everybody for a 61 yard touchdown - skins go up 20 to 10. and to put icing on the cake - kirk cousins connects with ryan grant for an 11-yard touchdown 20. america's longest working "rosie the

north korea. so we had a good conversations with them. the president reassured japan and south korea, but they talked about strategies going forward for north korea. on iran, that was a topic of conversation throughout the week. i think everyone was talking about the destabilizing activities they continue to do throughout the middle east, whether it is in syria, iraq, lebanon, yemen, and the list goes on. it is something we will continue to talk about and continue to move forward so we make sure that we are stopping theeir reckless behavior as well. we also cohosted a meeting with secretary boris johnson, as well as dutch foreign minister on human rights reform. we talked about the fact that it needed to be representative of its name. we have a lot of bad actors on that council. both the president and the vice president spoke about it and the need to see better quality countries on that council in order for it to be effective, and obviously for the united states to stay on it. if we do not see changes in the human rights council, we will continue to advocate for human rights, but we will do it on our own if we have to. then the vice president attended a s

the difference between north korea and iran is that we we re between north korea and iran is that weone with iran and sanctions were lifted, there was and sanctions were lifted, there was a new deal, they stopped their nuclear programme as far as we know. and president trump is due to report about the latest progress on that in about the latest progress on that in a matter of days. at least there was hope with the run. there was sold, very high hopes then. a couple of yea rs very high hopes then. a couple of years ago. a year later as well. but that has dissipated a lot since resident trump came to power. don't forget, what happens today comes ahead of two important milestones. in the next two days, we are expecting the united states government to announce its strategic plans for iran. its strategy towards iran. that is going to happen by the end of september, maybe around then, maybe if you days later. after that we have on the 15th of october, president trump is supposed to certify to the congress that iran has been compliant with the nuclear deal. but there are every signs that he

there is more chance of taking some further steps towards undermining iran rather than north korea seeing as you're talking about iran and you want to get someplace about iran i think i agree with dr baraka but also would like to at the how this is speech will resonate within iran because remember the deal itself while this is supported and promoted by president rouhani there were certain quarters was in iran not opposing to the deal and also how will this affect the. in terms of western europe being countries who are supporting this deal they see that this deal is good first is to prevent iran from a queer nuclear capability and secondly also to try to convince the iranians that engaging the international community is beneficial through the economic benefits that iran can reap and perhaps that will help to buy some time hopefully things might change in iran but this kind of rhetoric i think it might some of the european countries in terms of their stance when it comes to the speaking of the rhetoric actually can we have a look i'm talking to my team here in the control room we have a loo

chad, iran, libya, north korea, somalia, syria, venezuela and yemen.a replacement to the central portion of that travel ban which expired sunday morning. the new restrictions vary by country and include a phased-in approach. so most of the limitations you won't see go into effect until mid next month on october 18th. for the last three months, the trump administration has used an executive order to ban foreign nationals from six muslim majority countries from entering the u.s. unless they have a bone nied relationship with a person or entity in the country. individuals with that exception like a grandparent can still apply for visas to come to the u.s. until october 18. but after that date, these new restrictions will begin. on a call with reporters, a senior administration adviser called the in you restrictions tough but tailored and quote vital national security. the supreme court is set to hear arguments on the merits next month. the justice department will be filing an update with the supreme court soon. >>> thanks so much. an attorney for jared ku

north korea do anything irresponsible or reckless, that he has to choose from. reporter: thank you. just a quick one on north korea and i have a question on iran. administration has said this is not aimed at china, but china told its bank not to do business with north korea. secretary mnuchin said he called chinese. how is this not -- especially talked about how china is really the main financial backer. how can this not only be directed at china? on iran, is there a way to talk about, to ramp up iran destabilizing activities drop the middle east, which i think a lot of your allies agree on, without violating the agreements as secretary tillerson said? is there a way to get allies to rally around more terrorism type and other sanctions while keeping the nuclear provisions in place? ambassador haley: with the sanctions on north korea, it only impacts those that continue to do business with north korea. if china does business, it will impact them. there countries in africa, it will impact them. it depends on countries that use to continue to support north korea over the rest of the world that is asking them not to. in reference to iran, you have a

is collaborating with iran on ballistic missiles with north korea. iran is being careful to technically comply with this deal. so the word is they are looking for other outlets to as john pole on said, within the framework of the agreement to say it's not compliant and negotiate tougher inspections and not just giving them carte blanche after 8 years. charles: they are certainly one of the biggest financial backers of one of the most of horrific terrorists and murderers in the region. >> in the "wall street journal" there was an excellent peace that suggests north korea could be kicked out of the u.n. and we could do the same thing to iran. charles: when it comes to the graham-cassidy healthcare bill one thing republicans agree on is it's probably the last chance to get something on the board. it's easy to think that all money managers are pretty much the same. but while some push high commission investment products, fisher investments avoids them. some advisers have hidden and layered fees. fisher investments never does. and while some advisers are h

nations and certainly in the white house. >> jon: north korea doesn't have many friends in the world that one of them is around, what's to prevent iran from simply buying the hardware that it needs from north korea which clearly has nuclear capabilities. >> this is one of the great challenges for the international community right now. you are seeing a push from the white house to crack down on north korea, a lot of discussion right now on how cut off north korea entirely from the financial system, they keep to that as we have identified is china. china is really responsible for something like 83% of north korea's trade. we need to make sure the chinese are on board, that they cut off north korea entirely from the international system. that won't stop illicit networks involved in moving goods and perhaps even weapons back and forth between north korea and iran but i think vigilance and enforcement is what is necessary. i think the president's right to focus primarily on these two regimes, they are the governments that are posing the greatest threat to international security. >> jon: as you were speaking, we had live pictures of the pr

he'll talk about north korea and iran about nuclear weapons. ed by north korea and iran which is too great. joining us now from what to expect is bloomberg senior executive editor, marty shanker. i want to start by reading the leads out of the ftn. trumptreet journal says, to push nationalist policy and first u.n. address. i have never seen before verbatim headlines from the two. marty: maybe they were sitting next to each other at the briefing. what is the big deal with the nationalist? u.s.is wrong with the presence thing to the united nations that we want what is good for our country? marty: one of the things president trump is going to try to do is america first is actually good for the world and not a bad thing. calling for a united front against iran and north korea is a global message. david: will he talked to people who will listen, china, russia? marty: it is a really good point. the general assembly is light on leadership. merkel is not there. putin is not there. is still a star-studded audience, but the superstars are not there. they

>> well, we expect that he will come out very critical of north korea and iran, the particularly northsaying that other nations need to stand up as well, this just can't be the u.s. going after north korea. it's unclear exactly what he will ask other countries to do, and also whether he will go out -- it is unclear whether he will single out russia or china as an enabler of north korea. in the past he has been critical of china in particular for failing to stop the flow of oil to north korea, something that china has made clear they are not going to do in the short run. it will be interesting to see the details of what he wants others to agree to, but we know that will be the substance of the speech. it is interesting because in the past president trump has not been a fan of the u.n. and now he will be spending a lot of time and energy there for the next few days, asking other countries to support the u.s. manus: let's see what today brings. jodi schneider, thank you. the ceo of and even investors is still -- of aviva investors is still here. this is something that all managers have to

>> they are still catching their breath with some of the things he said, with north korea and iran at the top, it is clear he will not waste a lot of time for north korea to come so its senses. he was very, very clear his disdain for the iran nuclear deal. i think it is clearly on life-support. no final decision. i would be stunned after this kind of speech he stayed in the deal. liz: he called president obama's deal with iran embarassment. democrats are criticizing the president for ratcheting up the rhetoric on north korea. senator dianne feinstein said it was quote a severe disappointment. sheer is what she said. he missed a opportunity for any positive actions the u.n. can take against north korea, launched a diatribe against iran, offering no pathway forward. what is your response to that? >> she is just flat wrong. even the two security council sanctions resolutions both unanimous, that is true but u.n. since 2006 passed a dozen or 13 sanctions against north korea. they have been unanimous. would i say the cumulative impact on nuclear and ballistic miss till programs has been pr

nuclear deal let's start with north korea did he offer any viable strategy for dealing with the crisis over north korea's weapons program i mean in both the iran and north korea case we saw a rhetoric that is so hot it's going to be very difficult to climb down from. north korea specifically you know we heard this personal insult rocket man referring to kim which people have stated was a last minute addition added by the president himself what is unclear is what comes next what are the next steps and of course that's going to be in close consultation with our allies in the region we can hope that the next step isn't total destruction a given the implications of that ok the iran nuclear deal trump reiterated his skepticism about that many countries including russia and countries here in europe are concerned that the u.s. might unilaterally tera that deal did trump give any clues as to where the u.s. is going with this i think here the rhetoric indicates a path forward much more clearly than in the case with north korea he called the deal an embarrassment for the united states basically lining up the steps for a either withdrawal or an attempt t

senior administration officials say he'll call out iran, north korea, and venezuela by name.. for their threatening behavior. no issue is dominating more than north korea.. as the u.s. rallies support for tougher action against the regime. president trump is also expected to focus on the future of the iran nuclear deal. yesterday, he said the u.n. has not reached its full potential, because of bureaucracy and mismanagement. he talked about the need to make the united nations, quote: "great. not great again. make the united nations great." stay with abc-7 news - we will carry the president's speech live when it happens around 10:30 this morning. new reports this morning about the investigation into former trump campaign chairman paul manafort. according to c-n-n - government investigators wiretapped manafort before and after last year's election. investigators reportedly received permission from the "foreign intelligence surveillance court." "the new york times" reports prosecutors working for special counsel robert mueller told manafort in july that he should expect to be indic

officials describe as philosophical, and we are expecting the president to issue harsh warnings to iran and north koreawhat would you like to hear the president say? >> i think the president needs to layout a clear delineation about what we expect to see happening in iran and north korea and terrorism around the globe and other activities that the united nations should be leading in where they have fallen behind. as it relates to north korea, there are 160 nations that maintain a trade relation sship with north korea, and there are 21 that have diplomatic admissions with north korea and he needs to make it clear that countries and businesses have a choice to do business with the united states, the largest economy in the world or do business with north korea, but can't do both. we need to make it clear there's no room for china to simply talk about what they are going to do and say they object to north korean missile programs, and it's time for china to take the responsibility of a leading nation, a leading global power and deal with the madman. he needs to make it clear he's going to address it with or

there is clearly axis right now between iran and north korea. they are helping each other. ran has the money. north korea as technology. together they are very dangerous duo. i think the trump administration is trying to split the relationship right down the middle. >> of course, north korea is getting 2 to $3 billion a year from iran. they have basically merchandised all of their warfare. they provided chemical weapons. weapons of mass destruction to syria. all backed by iranians. they even provided reactor to syria, that israelis destroyed in 2007. they're very aggressive with their nuclear technology. with that 2 to $3 billion a year, coming from iran, this has a direct impact on why these sanctions with the united states have not been working. this is the first step with the bank of china. david: carl, i got to ask, what happens if north korea, i think leader of north korea is unhinged a bit, or totally unaware what is considered normal in the world. what if he continues to test these missiles, do we start shooting them down? >> well, david i think the president made it

heart and substance of it was what amounted to something close to a declaration of war on iran and north korea this was not trump isn't this non-national first to america first this is very dangerous frankly new conservative globalist belligerency that i think points in a very different direction from the rhetoric that he gave and what about the response from north korea though to trump's u.n.g.a. appearance it's making a lot of people really nervous particularly america's asian allies south korea and japan to name a few how is the president's rhetoric putting these countries in harm's way while the skies get as in their defense well it frankly does scare the socks off of them because this is this is sounding almost like trash talk before a fight except we're not just talking about fists we're talking about real war yeah we could lose thirty thousand americans on the d.m.z. in korea hundreds of thousands maybe millions of south koreans go goodness knows how many north koreans how many japanese and this goes terribly wrong to a rational person we should be saying as steve benen said roughly be

their major accomplice going on around in the world -- iran, north korea inching closer and closer with their program. we've seen multiple national disasters that have impacted the united case and u.s. territories in our region, health-care reform, tax reform. why is the president talking about the nfl? irrelevant.tely when he think about his role as president, he should not be focused on this. i remember where he tweeted something on barack obama. -- owner of he would take his own advice. -- which bye protesting, the way they do have a constitutional right to do is easily for is another thing of all is. the president upset with people protesting. if they are doing it legally, it is guaranteed by the first amendment. as a conservative, i will always agree to stand up and defend that right as i would hope they would defend my right if they disagreed with me. to see the president speak against the is troubling. you planning to the part of the housing development committee? guest: i was with dr. carson. i compare this candidacy to very goldwater. is the -- you begin to see the migration of

general assembly senior administration officials say the president will call out iran, north korea and venezuela by name for their threatening behavior. no issue is dominating more than north korea as the u.s. rallies support for tougher action against the regime. >> president do you have any comments about north korea? >> this will be a great week. we look forward to it. as far as north korea is concerned i think that most of you know how i feel. >> reporter: also in question, the fate of the iran nuclear deal negotiated by president obama. >> mr. president, do you plan to stay in the iranian nuclear >> reporter: in a lighter moment as he met with the president of france, the commander in chief said he wants a grand military parade similar to the one he saw in paris on ba steel day. >> we may do something like that on july 4th in washington down pennsylvania avenue. >> reporter: when president trump takes the podium many u.s. allies will be seated in that hall but so will those adversary he's calling out by name. in fact, north korea's top diplomat has a front row seat for the preside

pushing pushing on iran for north korea to say oh even when they make a deal as in the case of iran this trump administration is not going to want to keep the deal so why should north korea then make a deal well that's the perfect segue to my next question which was if the u.n. security council or the u.s. can dial back the craziness of the trumpet ministration with regard to north korea can they dial it back with regard to iran the deal was certified by or was it i'm not sure if the if the iran deal was certified by or run through the u.n. or was it just of six parties it's six parties yes but you know the six parties represent the. security the security council and they don't want to see this deal dial back and i think just today. angela merkel came forward and said we like the iranian nuclear deal we helped negotiate it we would like to negotiate something similar in the case of north korea so there are leaders that are coming forward to say not only do we not support the u.s. in this position we're ready to take the lead to see that this is dial back because nato is saying oh if ther

administration representatives, president in new york, and they are putting iran essentially in the same basket as north korea, portraying both countries as a threat to stability and peace and calling on the world to act. how do you feel when you hear iran and north korea spoken about in the same breath? >> translator: it is very incorrect to say such a thing. north korea has said in very straightforward manner that i seek nuclear weapons. it tests nuclear weapons. there is nothing hidden in north korea, north korea a country who today is in the nuclear club and has nuclear weapons. iran is completely the opposite point. >> despite tough words united states has certified iran's compliance with the deal before and scheduled for next report in october. >>> new questions being raised about the red cross, americans donating to aid victims of hurricane harvey. weeks after that storm, families in houston who said they were promised immediate relief are asking where is the money? katie beck is on the trail. >> reporter: street after street across houston, a struggle to move forward. >> it's just hard to look at ever

iran nuclear agreement. i am sorry to say that the access is alive and well. what north korea is doing today, you will love what iran will be doing a few years down the road. these states are led by rogue regimes that have sought nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them. they have cooperated closely on ballistic missile developments, perhaps to a lesser extent on nuclear issues. both regimes have repeatedly violated their nonproliferation commitments. as the 1994 agreed framework with north korea, -- north korea, failed to stop the country's nuclear ambitions. future historians will eventually say the 2015 nuclear iran agreement failed to stop iran's nuclear ambitions. i would argue that iran is much imposesgerous regime greater long-term threats the north korea. much stronger economy, much more potent ideology, many more friends, allies and surrogates around the world and in the region. it has a much more aggressive record of regional interventions. in iran's neighborhood, the persian gulf is the center of gravity for world oil. if iran is able to establish dominance

bush at the time, axis of evil, calling out iran, north korea, and iraq in that case, but very strong words, not as -- not just as you noted, wolf, about the potential to totally destroy north korea but he called the iran nuclear deal an embarrassment to the u.s. and a cover for its nuclear program. it's really difficult to see how this president stays in that nuclear agreement as he just described it there. listen to some of his language when he was describing north korea and iran. again that notion of evil. we must confront together those that threaten us. if the righteous many don't confront the wicked few, then evil will triumph. again, laying down a very hard rhetorical line with very specific and strong threats. a bellicose threat against north korea saying we may have to if defend ourselves and allies destroy north korea, but also calling that iran nuclear agreement which in effect was borne here at a previous u.n. general assembly, saying from his point of view it would be an embarrassment for a u.s. led by him to stay in it. a remarkable moment. the president drawing two very

reflecting the rigid and the strict agreement itself. >> you made the correlation between north korea and iran. you said the other day that north korea was starting to show some effects of the sanctions. can you expand on that? what are using so far? -- what are you seeing so far? when you talk about the idea that you want agreement with north korea, and then you seem to move the goalposts on iran, i think your counterparts would say the expectation was always there, and the hope that iran would improve its behavior. that was never written into the agreement. what do you say to those that are concerned, why would north korea make an agreement with united states if it is going to go back on its word on its agreement. does this hurt the credibility of the united states in making deals in the future? sec. tillerson: i think in terms of an agreement we would strike with north korea would be of a different nature than the iranian jcpoa, which by its title is a joint commission plan of action. it does not even contain the word agreement in its title. this is one of the challenges. what we really hav

i think it's worth asking a question whether a good part of iran's uranium enrichment program isn't buried under a mountain in north koreassador does the obama administration acknowledge at any point or did they know at any point that iran and north korea would be sharing nuclear weapons technology? >> i don't think they paid much attention to it. i don't think they understood the implications. i don't think they cared about it. i think that it's part in parcel of the obama administration's bobsy twins nuclear proliferation approach so it shouldn't be any surprise they didn't understand one way for iran to evade inspections and intelligence was to do their nuclear work somewhere else and we have an example of that. this is not hypothetical. >> liz: but should they have known about it? >> of course. absolutely. look in september of 2007 before obama was elected or took office , israel the dessert in syria. being built by whom? by north koreans. it was essentially a replica of north korea's reactor. now what were north koreans doing in the middle of the dessert in syria? were they there because of their long history and cl

that's what we're continuing this permanent war stay trump is benefiting from the tensions with north korea iran we just watched his u.n. speech i hold jake tapper and c.n.n. completely responsible for the fear mongering that has led to where we are on north korea and to use those terms like fire and fury and i think i think really the best thing that people can do if they don't like this is simply you know not only turn the channel but let them know you know let's. let people know that look we don't like this we don't like what you're doing we don't like what you're standing for please go back to being an honest journalist or we want journalism or ask airports and doctors offices not to play them. because that seems to be the only place i ever see it is the only people who really watch it or that it's in a place they don't know every night from and i want to ask you you know what do you feel is the best solution thirty seconds what do you feel is the best solution to this kind of. project hours of the world they need to be hounded and you know he claims that you know he's been promoted as this

there are suspicions something could happen between north korea and iran. that is active, but as far as i know nothing substantial has been found. during the six party talks, north korea committed not to engage in proliferation. obviously, we don't believe that is true, but i think it is on inice that if it does engage cooperation, it will be incredibly significant, and can trigger across a red line that would be hard for the united states not to take very akoni and action, and -- to take very draconian action. , can you discuss the way united states targets money laundering activity related to dprk? can we identify illicit transactions and stop them? i think what we are seeing now, in particular with china, is the trump administration is using it combination of the justice department tools and treasury department tools. late maycasions since they have used those tools to target money launderers, in particular those who are trying to do by natural transactions to the united states, whether it is designations, requests for asset calledure, or what is damming

referendum has been fiercely opposed by a number of international countries including iraq turkey and iran north korea says further sanctions will only speed up its nuclear and missile programs the statement follows the latest missile test by pyongyang on friday the foreign ministry is calling the pursuit of more restrictions by the u.s. a hostile act the commander in chief of men miles armed forces is blaming their own hager for violence which sparked the refugee crisis when on hearing says his forces are only targeting armed groups but the u.n. says the military is ethnically cleansing most of the remainder civilians it's talk to al jazeera next stay with us. on counting the cost how apple's i phone economics make it the most profitable company in the world. how the j. trade is influencing the prices in myanmar. plus one hundred days of the gulf crisis we'll look at how qatar's economy is fare. counting the cost at this time on i just did i. mean. ben jools international airport january two thousand and seventeen stepping out of the black limousine is going to be as longtime president. as he walks d

they are major powers out there and have influence in iran and north korea. north korea, china borders it, so does russia. and with iran china is a major tour by much of their oil and russia plays parole. the sanctions are great, but implementation is important. these countries know how to smuggle and set up shell companies, front companies. their interests don't necessarily i line with us in both places. charles: we just intercepts russian ships smuggling oil into north korea. speaking of acting. general mattis has been vocal lately. he's always level headed. by said something interest being the $700 billion we are going to spend on defense, that that's not enough and if america doesn't step up and remove the spending caps, we are doomed as a nation. is that hyperbolic or is there truth in that? >> we need to take stock and see what needs to be fixed up since the obama -- after the obama years. you have got people working longer and longer hours. the accident rate in the military right now is significantly higher than i can remember when i was on active duty.

then at this point what should it be toward north korea and toward iran? -- towards north korea. find a way a short term dialogue with north korea. make sure that they freeze their nuclear development, nuclear weapons some kind of the leading the needle because we say to north korea we're not going to talk to you until you give up your nuclear development, we are not going to do that maybe there is something in between. maria: what is the nuclear iran deal wasn't that supposed to be what it was about? the nuclear deal was iran has stopped developing their nuclear weapons in exchange for lifting saings, so far, iran has complied, where they are not behaving is in the region, with saudi arabia, with yemen with syria, they are hurting us everywhere, so i think negotiate put pressure on them, separately with european allies with russia, china to that signed nuclear agreement don't give up nuclear agreement we already have that we have that in our pocket, it seems to be working nothing is perfect. >> what did you think of china's latest move in terms of these of

. >> president trump warned world leaders iran and north korea must be stopped. he said the u.s. is not afraid to use military force if necessary. >> the united nations has grea but if it is forced to defend itself, or its allies, we will have no choice, but to totally destroy north korea. >> the president then used his newly coined nickname for north korean dictator kim jong-un. >> rocketman is on a suicide mission for himself. and for his regime. >> the president accused iran of financing terrorism in the middle east. and repeated calls for the world to unite against islamic extremism. >> we will stop radical islamic terrorism, because we cannot allow it. to tear up our nation, and indeed, to tear up the entire world. >> mr. trump also implied he might pull out of the obama era deal to halt iran's pursuit of nuclear weapon. 's a decision to renew is next month. >> frankly that deal is an embarrassment to the united es the last of it. believe me. >> closer to hope, mr. trump called cuba and venezuela failed socialist states. he said venezuela has descended into chaos after illeg

he six to take on iran and north korea.he unitedt years, nations has not reached its full potential, because the bureaucracy and mismanagement. one the united nations on a regular budget has increased, or 140%, and it's staff has more than doubled since 2000, we are not seeing the results in line with this investment. >> meanwhile, president trump spoke by telephone to president of china, resident xi jinping, aiming to step up the pressure on north korea. agreeing oners enforcing sanctions. a critic of u.s. policy on north korea, saying that diplomacy is the only way forward to read the united states say beijing must do more. top tradeent's negotiator has hit out at china, describing it as an unprecedented threat to world trade. he says of china's model creates andnatural competition distorts market, saying that he has received many complaints from american business leaders. bloomberge telling that equifax learned about a major hack in march, a must five months before the date it has publicly disclosed. the company says the

north korea? is that the objective now? >> well i hope not. i think we'll learn a lot more obviously as the president speaks on iran as well as north korea. try and persuade this worldwide audience of the severity of the threat that both north korea and iran pose. so i think this is a chance for him to help marshall support for what could be a tough decision, possibly including military force. stuart: but it is aggressive diplomacy at this point, backed up with the threat of the military in the background? >> that's true. to that extent it will fail. the rhetoric of the trump administration has been different from barack obama's but in fact the secretary of state said as recently as sunday, his objective is still to get the north koreans to the negotiating table. that is a strategy that will fail. stuart: do you think that we're almost inevitably heading towards a military clash? >> well i think if you're content to have north korea and iran with nuclear weapons there will be no military clashes. the president is getting up there. we're about to hear them. perhaps we know the answer from him right here. stuart: i think we should listen in

secondly, what will he say about the iran deal and north korea? oke to the iranian president, you're absolutely right, yesterday. he said in iran they're sitting there in tehran, wondering what's going to happen. they've been discussing this for months. they have the plans set if the u.s. pulls out. this is what he said to me about that. >> translator: exiting such an agreement would have -- would carry a high cost for the united states of america. and i do not believe that americans would be willing to pay such a high cost for something that will be useless for them. it will yield no results for the united states. but at the same time, it will generally decrease and cut away and chip away at international trust placed in the united states of america. >> what does he mean by high cost? >> he means going back to what iran was doing before this agreement. in other words, rapidly producing and enriching uranium. that's what he means. that would be very, very unwise for the united states and for the rest of the international community right now to have