but in germany like england, the venetians being adopted by university ism. and we have been working, we've uh, we've been working on at least 2530 cases of where a academic soon. and the students were put under district investigation because of what we've posted on social media like boston pro, palestine content, the social media. and after the university adopted, the lights already been shown. so these default where uh, received a complaint against a leading pest of their social media posts were violating g a, b, i sorry, the insurance and report were, were on pacific. in another case in england was really, really astonishing to a young muslim woman was offered the job in the public. uh, you know, you probably could body and uh, after doing the last check. uh, the employer said that her social media posts to where and to send me get submitted according to the i sorry, the nation before, but we do all the job offer. uh, the good side of the stars here is back in all these cases. we managed to push rebecca, so because i'm going to go to support the these woma

but that is true of, of every ism that exists in every movement of racism, sexism, homophobia. and of course, because this is a movement where jews are the perpetrators in palestine as is rarely jewish citizens, we'd have to be extra on guard. and part of the problem with confusing and design isn't in anti semitism, is that we've drained anti semitism of meaning to some extent. okay. it becomes much, much harder to confront. ok, thanks. sorry, i, i my so you, you have a deep understanding of the history here, of course. and as you have observed, these dreadful events of the past 12 months. what is your sense about this question of whether being critical of design is projects equates to being and you sent me a check on how the framing of that question if you like, has changed over the pos. yeah. yeah. um. well also thanks and thanks for having me . um look, there is obviously a certain rise in anti semitism when one has to observe it. one can say however, it said that the post to some extent on how one defines anti semitism. we know that the atl frances, the anti defamation leag

i shouldn't say that that's not the vision of republican ism anymore. the idea and i love because, you know, make america great again is not not trump. that was reagan. it was taken by stone. roger and and re fabricated forum for donald trump. but they couldn't be more in the approach. making america great again underrate. reagan was very aspirational i would say that the emphasis was the great under reagan. under trump, it's the again it's very backward looking, it's very restorative. let's go back to this mythical america that existed for our demographic because it worked for us. it worked for our even though we know it didn't work for anybody else, to the point where you've republicans who are literally erasing history in changing out history books and not allowed to by law talk about certain things that were, you know, history. that's a people that are view themselves very much in decline. and there's a very strong between those that are republicans and that are very pessimist about the future. so almost a direct correlation is if you don't like whe

really key and he begins tomorrow and this is where we get some answers conflicting data, remember ismervices exploded to the outside this is what the fed thought they thought was not going to happen they said they put that to bed apparently they have not put it to bed, it is a critical moment and we will see what happens but there is a bright spot in today's session and that is nvidia which is popping on comments by ceo jensen young yesterday after the close. take a listen. >> the demand for block wall is insane everybody wants the most and be first. charles: i loved it, it was genuine excitement, it comes from jensen all the time but i heard something similar before, take a listen. >> the get everything in stereo equipment, get it now, the greatest aerial cell ever these prices are insane. charles: those that live in the new york area you remember crazy eddie prices are insane was a massive scam the company went bankrupt. nvidia laden onto thick? let's bring in alpine saxon woods, sarah hunt, i am a huge fan, welcome to the show. i did watch your interview that you gave in june on nv

so today that as a reminder, ourselves, that our upon us what kind ism is not about building walls that are on the continent of africa, but creating pages in us that, that will end to adjust this, you know, split it, that will ensure that we are respected you know, spirit that will ensure that we are such an us in the world in a mind that will define a feature. and in a mind that we have define humanity dot is the fun off we can split 3, i engaging and we must continue to engage, but we dissolve a break in a few seconds time. we will be back again to continue the conversation. the fellow americans today are on forces joined our nato allies in air strikes against the serbian forces the the guy village spoke to us with them and we, we still forward concrete disregard, you know, spam race is i mean, nation which is reinforced with the depleted uranium that has a special capacity to spend the tree pro my new car safety point of view. there is no radiological the or even and nothing is significant consequences. the, the symmetry seems endless. a real city of a dead where it's very easy to ge

there's obstruction, there's this this clientele ism. there's corruption, this corruption is scale. we call that kleptocracy. but on governing is its own thing, it does have a history. it has a constituency, and it has, we argue, a future. whether or not trump is reelected, because this assault on governing can be carried on by a rogue political party, the illegitimate descendant of conservative republicanism. it can be carried on by a reactionary and sometimes violent social movement and, by a majority of life tenured justices of the supreme court who clearing the way and they'll stop. yeah, i'm not going to talk. the evolution of the right or its current nature. instead, i'm going to kind of pose a question here that i think is probably on a lot of people's minds is, you know, you can look at the nature of trumpian populism today and you can look at candidate trump and, you can kind of wonder, are the democrats kicking their --? right. i mean, this is like not a particularly hard opponent. you'd think widely disliked across the united states, he says. all kinds of crazy things, an

quite well where you say, we have what is right now socialism for the rich and competition or capital ism for the poor. you into a bunch of details about why that's true to an extent. but then you of course, finish it off with a massive amount then you finish it off with a massive amount -- a large amount of the welfare state that exists which is mostly for middle class people, the poor and other types of people who are not the rich. to takem away the question have from this who isn't covered by bailouts in the united states? how true is bernie's statement really? signed the half truth. it's true we have socialism for the rich even the welfare state in terms of that they need to get like all of the benefits or giveaways as well. it has become socialized risk for everyone. the most galling part of that is the rich are also getting socialized by the government. if any company or large corporate is on the verge of failure, the government stands ready to bill that company out. and that is something that's very new because back in the grand old days of american capitalism you did not have this

but zion isms leaders from theater heard. so to benjamin netanyahu understood that a jewish state in palestine meant the removal of those already there. the air, the palestinians, and so gaza is destroyed thousands of palestinian children killed and living on bond as israel's war attempts to draw in the wider region and possibly further beyond. the west continues to support the genocide. but something is beginning to shift. the legal institution setup after the 2nd world war to serve the new us lead world order. institutions that have long denied palestinians justice might at last be standing up for the palestinian people. have reasonable grounds to believe that he's really prime minister benjamin netanyahu administer of defense. you, i've got back criminal responsibility for the salvation of civilians as a method of wolf or unintentionally directing attacks against a civilian population as well as crimes against humanity of extermination, bundling matter because genocide and data so clear because impunity originally is tied

i'm no fan of christian national ism really in any of its manifestations. story that got a lot of attention. is donald trump selling god bless u.s.a. bibles? what did you think about that and all the attention it got in the news? yeah, i it disgusting. i think he's a huckster. i think he's always been a huckster on on on the prowl to make a buck. he keeps coming up with innovative schemes. and yeah, i think really he has no business doing that. i yeah. i believe the bible use for that is king james version and i'd be wrong about that. that's public domain version. you can get a version free. i believe you can get a printed version for like 399 on amazon. i encourage people to do that there's no need for a bible with song lyrics and constitution and pictures of america in it. let's read the word of god and. it's not there. to david in austin, texas independent. good morning. yes, i hope can hear me. i just had a question for your guests. firstly, i totally agree with the idea of reading the bible. i think it's a i think it's an awesome book. i also wanted to

working to answer the loss of faith in the old order has registered as intensified anti egalitarian ism rather than a renewed egalitarianism. why perceptions, public corruption and criminality have led the open embrace of corruption and criminality rather than its rejection and why? discontent with the distribution, wealth and power has fostered closer popular identification with certain of capitalism and capitalists. do you feel like you have a better answer to any of those questions after writing this book a little? i think that basically, you know, the assumption, the logical assumption is that, you know, the book takes begins in a where there's there's a very stark inequality, economic distress in american life. and the assumption you'd have as well. under such conditions, people would tend towards, you know, egalitarian programs and some kind of bolstering the social safety net. i think people are seduced by a message that says, well, we live in an extremely society. it's easy to fall through the cracks. it's a struggle. and the people telling you that we can build something that's

so straight the, the prime minister benjamin netanyahu echoed the words of zion isms, founding figure. theodore hurtful as he reached for judeo christian solidarity in europe and in the united states. this is not a clash of civilizations. it's a clash between barbarism and civilization. the response was unequivocal. his real was make sure that they have what they need to protect their people today and always. there is a necessity to continue to support israel. unconditional way to send even more weapons to as well to stand behind is really for more what we're seeing here is this western identity. and how if we need to really come to terms with israel, we need to come to terms is really genocide, which is a continuation of the knock about. then we need to think about simpler colonialism at the heart of the international political and legal system after world war 2. which means that we also need to come to terms with southern and colonialism in the u. s. and in the west and who wants to do that? but we can't understand that without thinking about what sits at the heart of central coloni

after comes us seeking repair, it is some forced liberties in the spirit they'll find out for good ism offer comes uh, speaking repair isn't for a quarter nice this and this put it to find out what that is. the offer comes us thinking that the son of the consul active folks that now find the residents in museums in different parts of europe and america off because say, we must be given that which was new to africans. i say that even what you call the depths that i owed through you through us institutions such as the math such as the wide bunk must be seen at the beginning of the parish. and in bit one must go down just and remember that when in 1900 down 6 to 3 on the 25th day of may the organization of last week on unity was this douglas in august stopped by. it's still yeah. with the presence of $32.00 heads of states, the government, the idea at that time was that the us, the co would unite and then did up to 1963. there was a chiral meeting of 1964 on the 1965 missing enough that i've done, which was meant to be the meeting at which i'll click on unit the was to be solidified. it n

quite well where you say, we have what is right now socialism for the rich and competition or capital ism for the poor. you into a bunch of details about why that's true to an extent. but then you of course, finish it off with a massive amount of all, with a large amount of the welfare state that exists, which is mostly for middle class people, middle class people, the poor and elsewhere, and other types of people who aren't the rich. the take away the question i have from this is who isn't covered by bailouts in the united states and how true is bernie's statement really? yes, i think that the statement of bernie signed sanders is the half truth, which is that it's true that we have had socialism for the rich. but what i argue in the book is that we seem to have social risk for everyone. so even the welfare state, of course, has grown exponentially over time. the middle class, you know, like in terms of i've got, you know, feel entitled that they need to get like all the benefits are giveaways as well so it's really become social risk for everyone. now, of course, the most galling part o

i'm talking about the appeasement of woke or ism at home as well as the appeasement of totalitarianism abroad. we have to do both of those things because both of those things are threatening our way of life. totalitarian regimes like china, russia and have to be stood to the only thing they understand is strength. and now the military aid budget has been passed through congress. the needs to be more clarity about russia can be defeated and how china and iran will also be taken on and in order achieve that we are to need a change in personnel at the white house. now i worked in cabinet whilst donald trump was president and by while president biden was president and i assure you the world felt safer when donald was in office. 2024 is going to be a vital. and it's the reason that i wanted to bring my book now because getting a conservative back in the white house is critical to taking on the global. and i hate to think what life would be like with another four years of a placement of the woke left in the united states, as well as continued weakness on the international stage. but my final

and we'll forget that in the spirit of bon off with an ism today, africans are seeking repair is some forced liberty in the split it they'll find out for goodness, for comes us seeking repair isn't for a quarter nice vision in the split the fund off. we're going to offer comes uh, seeking that the son of the card through active folks. now find the residents in museums in different parts of europe and america off as i say, we must be given that which was new to africans. i say that even what you call the depths that i owed through you through us institutions such as the math such as the wide bunk must be seen at the beginning of the patient. and in that, as one must go down to this. and remember that when in 190-1631 the 25th day of may, the organized vision of us with an unity was this douglas in i just stopped by itself the with the presence of 32 heads of states on the government. the idea at that time was that after the co would unite and then did up to 1963, there was a chiral meeting of 1964 on the 1965 missing enough that i have done which was meant to be the meeting at which of

. >> i will say that we had some ism numbers today and ism numbers around the world that emphasize why policymakers around the world are throwing a lot of stimulus and at least support to markets to asset prices. it's an interesting day. you can make an argument that anything that went on in the treasury market and especially the dollar was a function of a flight to quality. but the ism numbers are ones that also could give bears another opportunity. we've got a huge payroll number suddenly looming on friday. so, let's think about. that think about the setup. think about the setup that could be geopolitics which if anything i would argue were further down the road. you can make an argument that possibly what china is doing in terms of the stimulus side is playing, first of all, they're playing defense. but they will be embolden by anything that goes on around the world even though i am not making that call on china here. i'm simply saying, we think about geopolitical escalation. and, you know, as far as i'm concerned, we're certainly in a place today that is at least as dangerous as it

do in stumbling toward utopia is i show the slow and then accelerating death of mainline protestant ism. the united states and. i show a number of members nationally in in the mid sixties and then variously as the data was available where they were at. but you can you can you can conclude easily that the hollowing out of protestantism in lee has been has been the recipient in a colossally manner for american religion faith again as a result of the goals of the sixties. two things and then i'll stop. first the impact on basic civility in our country. i wanted to to illustrate i do in the book you know using the examples some famous americans how the brutalism of the 1960s and the radical revolution of the sixties how this has changed basic friendships family relationships just the way that we relate in the public square and and i and i used just one of many examples is in the loss of civility as a result of the sixties. and i use an example of a lifelong friendship between two of the most famous men ever in hollywood history henry fonda and jimmy stewart. they were lifelong friends. one

data, if you had the ism, the services part of the economy, the biggest part of the economy, hits 54.7, the unemployment rate which we know is a function not only of the numbers of people who have jobs but the number of people that participate in the survey going down to 4.1% is great news for a fed if you think 4.3 or 4.6 is the upper end of their bogey i don't think that much really changed other than reassurance that this economy wasn't falling off a cliff, that in fact the number we got for july that we got on august 2nd wasn't as bad as it looked there were upward revisions to those months that everybody thought were so weak i don't think this means we're getting 250 a month from here on out either the jobless claims didn't tell us this number was going to be bad, and it wasn't it was solid good news is good news for equities i'd much rather see the 10-year at 4% and equities feeling the economy is in good shape and i think based on where you see so many outperformance going on in cyclical stuff, you stay there. >> what is the chance of a 25 basis point cut? that's probably the pa

but yet you'll get a sense of these on the account isms that can oper right? when it comes to books, who don't do to get a sense of gravity about the tools they have to have to implement new realities on the grounds that if they decide to model it, solve this particular problem. how can we do it or? well, i can, i can see that amongst many men, but many bricks member states. there's also a commonality of view about what needs to happen with the united nations. it's not power the, the type of say it's how it's being abused. and i have to say that over the past 2 to 3 years, um russia has used the visa of a great deal. america has used to be to a great deals and america's been backed up. but by my country britson, i think it's the british countries can come together and pushed the desperately needed you and reform been the book so suddenly on to something. because not certainly and many bricks member states talking about a different well economic order. but once they start talking about a different political and security older, we're on to something and many, ma

i don't want to do the what about-ism. what i what i want to say is there is a real question about what does kamala harris actually believe and that is i think a fair question to be pressed on. i'm not saying that it isn't what i think is not fair is this is just the extrapolation from that that somehow she is the next sort of you know now say tongue, that's going to come over here. >> anybody's saying that, but anyway, donald trump we're going to get to talk about donald trump no stranger to controversial comments. but this week it says behavior that setting off alarm bells, including dancing for 30 minutes at a rally also ahead, trust issues that concerning trend in who people believe is there anything we can do to stop it and light are swiping right or left depending if you're right or left. the new political twist to today watches this show. >> so stuff then a cnn special event, two weeks before election day vice president harris basis voters and takes the pressing questions lie anderson cooper moderates a cnn and actu

working to answer the loss of faith in the old order has registered as intensified anti egalitarian ism rather than a renewed egalitarianism. why perceptions, public corruption and criminality have led the open embrace of corruption and criminality rather than its rejection and why? discontent with the distribution, wealth and power has fostered closer popular identification with certain of capitalism and capitalists. do you feel like you have a better answer to any of those questions after writing this book a little? i think that basically, you know, the assumption, the logical assumption is that, you know, the book takes begins in a where there's there's a very stark inequality, economic distress in american life. and the assumption you'd have as well. under such conditions, people would tend towards, you know, egalitarian programs and some kind of bolstering the social safety net. i think people are seduced by a message that says, well, we live in an extremely society. it's easy to fall through the cracks. it's a struggle. and the people telling you that we can build something that's

this is a, an example of, of the victims of is really the tentative isms states on the 10th of ism against 11 and syria and published by the this is an idea is right. yeah, souls tired out and thousands of strikes me and favorite international last thoughts blocks local scene bellowing across the city. lebanese officials reported that such as southern were killed, i know is a 100 wounded and not to attack. was the situation in the middle east continues to deteriorate. uranium the supreme need to has to address both his citizens and those of lebanon, and a rab public, a parent scientology, how many said the region faces a common trapped. the enemy of the iranian people is the same as the enemy of the palestinian people. he is the same enemy of the lebanese people. that same government is the enemy of the rocky people. the enemy of the people of egypt is the enemy of the people of syria and the enemy of the people of human. well, there is one enemy, joke, the methods of the enemy very in different countries in one place with psychological warfare, in another, with economic pressure in yet an

well, i mean, there was always degree of, a pretty pronounced degree anti-intellectual ism in conservative politics, you know, very famously, william f buckley said that he would rather be ruled by the first thousand people in the boston phonebook than by the faculty at harvard. you know, the difference i think one of the important differences, though, is that there's still was a a degree of committee meant to, again to go back to reveal oliver, the fact that he had a ph.d. in classics and taught at a major american university. that's something that john birch society very deliberately cultivated. they loved having him despite the fact that he was a lunatic, in addition to being a neo-nazi, claimed one point that jfk was assassinated by, the communist conspiracy. because kennedy himself was a communist and was not delivering america to communism fast enough. this wrote this in 1964, shortly after the it almost got him fired from his tenure position. but it still mattered that he had sort of academic credentials and expertise. and i think you're right that something changed in i was talking

no, it's not around what trump ism says, but it's around what we know. the second largest minority voting bloc like. we get to define that and i think we're of in the process of understanding what that means, understanding that you can be a black latina immigrant and be as american as anyone else know, that you can be even an undocumented immigrant that has been here for 12 or 20 years, that has been paying taxes and be as american as anyone is. so i think we have to normalize that. and so i think that gives me hope, you know, this idea that i think if we're able to cut through the politics, the stereotypes and the bipartisanship, a i believe that latinos can can get us there. and we hope so. and thank you so much. thank you. is a really an honor and privilege to be able to have this conversation with you. and i hope many, many people read your book. help us get somewhere forward. thank you. and thank you for for taking the time to do this. i said it as i was stepping into this studio. you have been a guiding rug for me, for i think so many other younger

no, it's not around what trump ism says, but it's around what we know. the second largest minority voting bloc like. we get to define that and i think we're of in the process of understanding what that means, understanding that you can be a black latina immigrant and be as american as anyone else know, that you can be even an undocumented immigrant that has been here for 12 or 20 years, that has been paying taxes and be as american as anyone is. so i think we have to normalize that. and so i think that gives me hope, you know, this idea that i think if we're able to cut through the politics, the stereotypes and the bipartisanship, a i believe that latinos can can get us there. and we hope so. and thank you so much. thank you. is a really an honor and privilege to be able to have this conversation with you. and i hope many, many people read your book. help us get somewhere forward. thank you. and thank you for for taking the time to do this. i said it as i was stepping into this studio. you have been a guiding rug for me, for i think so many other younger

there was congregational ism. there was unitarian ism. she read a lot of sort of theological verse. one of her favorite books was something called hymns for infant minds by the british spiritual poet jane taylor. lydia loved her work, was very, very moved by it. she actually had a dream in which she met jane taylor in heaven, and she burst into tears. she was so moved and excited. jane taylor's work has completely vanished, except for one thing, which is that she wrote twinkle, twinkle, little star. so apparently you need one hit. you know, that's all you need to survive. the other thing that lydia jackson was very, very interested in was the thought of emmanuel swedenborg. there was a huge vogue for swedenborg in this country in the first half of the 19th century. swedenborg was a kind of crazy swedish polymath. he seems to have invented a submarine. he seems to have invented something called a universal musical instrument. i don't know what that is. he invented water pumps that were used by the swedish ministry of mines, who actually employed him as a metallurgist. so he was very

that that is not even equality of opportunity for them, let alone the fact that, of course, capitalist ism naturally gravitates itself to inequality of outcomes. but that's supposed to be based on meritocracy. so in short, i think what's gone wrong with capitalism today is that it's been really distorted, as i argue in the book, that the seeds of government actions have led to a capitalist form. today that is very much different from what its founders have in mind, and it includes the suite of government habit. it's not just government spending and deficits and debt that have been rising over time. it's the tendency to regulate the tendency, bail out companies at the slightest hint of trouble. the tendency to manage or micromanage the business cycle. and of course, in all this is also the role of the us federal reserve when it seems so acutely sensitive to even small fluctuations in the stock market, you know that it's become this sort of asymmetry that on the upside people are allowed to gain. on the downside, no one is really allowed to fail. so we have had a socialization of risk that's

this -ism, not us, this -ism. and it's not just us, the white house, saying this. you heard it from officials come former officials that worked for the former president say this as well. so you know, do we agree? i i know the vice president just spoke about this, about that determination, yes, we do. we do. let's that forget i will point you to january 6th what we saw on january 6, 2000 people were were told to the go to the capital to undo a free and fair election by the former president. it was a dark, dark day in our democracy and a dangerous one. we have people who died because of what happened on january 6th. and we cannot forget that. we cannot forget that. and so, and i will add, i will add this, that come at a can't believe i even have to say this but our nation's veterans are heroes. they are heroes. they are not losers or suckers. they are heroes. and to be praising adolf hitler is dangerous and is also disgusting. >> when he said when you do agree president biden believes donald trump is a fascist? >> i mean yes. we've said come he set himself, the forme

by lying so effectively and being so, you know, so congenial, in a certain way, may have sold trump-ism without trump which has been sort of the long dream of the republican party, but i do think since it's been 24 hours, we are seeing that actually a lot of voters really liked walz better, and you even saw that on the right, there was the statistic that sort of 25% of the right wing is voters who watched it found that they liked walz. so the midwestern nice, actually think that translated and maybe he didn't get quite all the hits in maybe he was not able to provide the real- time fact check in the way that in an ideal world he would have been able to but his personality still transmitted in a way that voters like. and i do think vance, if you want to spend time being worried, you can worry about that vance was able to make trump-ism without trump seem a little bit more possible. and i think that might have implications for 2028. >> lay it out, because jd vance came across smart, quick and capable but as molly just said, the things that he was saying smoothly, and speedily, it was fill

kills another victory, brussels as wand repeatedly that the government's increase in author retiree on ism jeopardizes its chances of e u membership. now there been some reports of potential irregularities during the vote. in the w correspondents, you will have a shuttle as in the georgia incompetence of an easy you told me more which is the way to the pulse of independent detection observers. ideas that are very, very menu. so how is the country to dates from all of the roles, but we have had some reports from the opposition that apparently not everything is going well today a video. so for example, circulating on social media in which you can see that the box is being stuffed with the whole bunch of bella peebles, even those videos are really, would be illegal. of course. uh, overall 18 policy associations are participating in these selections. uh, 5 bought 2 of them. uh, half of the best tenses, the pro, ration improving georgia dream and for pro western opposition parties. right. i mean, the selection seems like a big deal, right? right. for me. so is the session time for georgia, eith

harry benjamin, answered the affirmative, arguing transsexual and transvestite ism, required, quote, educate men in treatment instead of, as he put it, in his popular 1966 textbook, the transsexual phenomenon. most liberals and moderates, however, expressed hesitancy about expanding the victimless crime framework to encompass cross-gender expression, citing in particular concerns about, quote, men in dresses who, quote, deceived heterosexual men into committing, quote, unnatural homosexual acts. for instance, in an article about, quote, male criminals who dress like women the author conceded that some transvestite acts were, quote, harmless individuals. but the piece claimed that most transvestites were sexual psychopaths who harbored a, quote, deep and unreasoning hatred for of the opposite sex. the question for law enforcement, this article was determining which were, quote, harmless and which ones posed a credible criminal threat. during the late 1960s, some trans activists and liberal allies offered a novel answer to this question, arguing white, transsexual women who issued sex

. >> hasn't ism been contracting for a number of years now? >> it has, but it looked like it bottomed and it started to pick back up again. when i look at what the pmi does, it generally lags moves by nine months. it's been consistent for many decades and we are now at the point when we have 20 of 18 now cutting rates and it's usually the point at which you start to see a bottom and begin to move higher again. we're in the period of nine months when it starts to move up from 50 on the global pmi to 55. that's shall usually a revision for stocks and they move higher and the jury is out as to whether we see the follow through. >> for you the most interesting point is to see theish sm manufacturing out in the first day of the month start to move up toward 55 in the u.s. does that make you not want exposure to industrials and cyclical stocks until you get that confirmation and follow through and the market more broadly? >> i think it's okay to build the positions now because the valuations are pricing in that it won't move higher above 50. so i th

>> i think the jobs report is less important today than it was before the ism report.i thought it was a really strong number i think there's different inputs to it, things that you can start to tear apart. the growth scare, bad news will be bad news. good news today in the ism knocked equities higher until other things globally brought them back down so, i think that jobs number -- the jobless claims number, do not correlate or corroborate that the job market is falling apart. an again, it's the participation rate that is moving higher the fed's made it clear, they are focused on the other side of the boat, which is the job market so, i -- i think it's going to be possibly net positive >> we got encouraging news, obviously, last couple days on that front we'll see if the rate moves tomorrow i'm still a believer that the unemployment rate is going to go higher but real quick, that pdd trade, just for context, throw up a chart. a month ago, this was a $90 stock. >> wow >> so, you think about the risk associated with selling puts at that strike, given where this thing was

we have s&p global manufacturing and services, ism non-manufacturing, ism manufacturing.er were negative, were contracting. and in that kind of a month this is the employment report that we get? it's just, it's extremely confusing, charles. you mentioned people who are not in the stock market, you know, 75% of the jobs that were created last month were in health care, leisure and hospitality and government, of course government. these are very low paying jobs. and it's emblematic of what we've been seeing one month after another to. and i'll add one more thing, charles, we had positive revisions to the month of august, and everyone was, like, yea, it wasn't a negative. you know what? there were negative revisions to the the private sector jobs for the month of august. it was only government jobs that caused the upper trajectory revision. charles: another thing that really stands out to me is this sharp, i mean, we're talking about a major decline in full-time workers down almost 5090,000 from a year ago -- 50900,000. that's -- 500,000. that's real life. that's what real l

lisa: same with ism manufacturing, ism services.he employment market, that is why people say that it's treading water and you are on a nice age to the downside. not necessarily to some kind of re-acceleration. what makes a break one way or the other? does the 50 basis point rate cut help it break to the upside? are we seeing the trough or is this the beginning? jonathan: or can we stabilize here for a while, hopefully? lisa: it has never worked like that. jonathan: hopefully. we can share in that dream, all right? ending a three-day strike after reaching a contract extension through the middle of january. workers return to start negotiations on a long-term agreement including a pay increase of just under 62%. the pay has been addressed. one thing that hasn't and a major way is the language around automation. that is ultimately the bigger issue. annmarie: lisa, you put it earlier that it is a short-term gain but long-term it is anxiety about what these jobs will look like and they are trying to quell concerns about automation. that i

well, really, you know, biblical illiteracy and, you know, just vulgar ism. how how it is that, you know, the great mystery of why it is, although some people have said there's no mystery at all. when you study evangelicals. why do evangelicals in increasingly large majorities find trump not just. a candidate that they can use to advance their own agenda, but somebody who they regard kind of chosen and. yeah. yeah well, kind of. they do. right right. yes. well, charles darwin, great hero of the religious, wrote that we bear the stamp of our origin. and that statement applies is to the religious right, because there's a common misperception out there that the christian conservative movement began as oppositional toward abortion and maybe gay rights, but in reality, christian evangelicals voted the first time in large numbers for jimmy carter. in 76, they turned against him in 1980 and supported his opponent ronald reagan because carter been aggressive in punishing christian elementary and secondary schools in the south that, refused to admit black, latino and