at i am there for them kohl us foreign secretary james baker and others have assured me that nato will not move an inch to the east. the americans did not fulfill this promise, and the germans showed indifference, maybe even rubbing their hands, as they say , the americans deftly tricked the russians, of course, began to make a surprised face, they say. i am not me and the hut is not mine, they did not promise anything, which means they did not violate anything, but decisive proof. there are several lies at once, firstly, a transcript of gorbachev’s negotiations with us secretary of state james baker, when the soviet the leader emphasized that eastward expansion for the ussr is unacceptable. the head of american diplomacy told him literally the following: neither the president, nor i, nor intends to benefit unilaterally from the current processes, that is, due to the collapse of the socialist bloc, which at that time was already becoming a reality, if if we keep germany in nato , then its north atlantic treaty organization will not extend jurisdiction one inch to the east, he promised.

i have kohl the minister of foreign affairs with them the united states, james baker and others, assured me that nato would not move an inch to the east. the americans did not fulfill this promise, and the germans showed indifference, maybe even rubbing their hands, as they say , the americans deftly tricked the russians, of course, began to make a surprised face, they say. i’m not me and it’s not my house, they didn’t promise anything, which means they didn’t violate anything, but there are several decisive evidence of lies at once, firstly, a transcript of gorbachev’s negotiations with us secretary of state james baker, when the soviet the leader stressed that the expansion to the east. the ussr is not acceptable, the head of american diplomacy told him literally the following, neither the president, nor i, nor intends to derive unilateral benefits from the current processes, that is, due to the collapse of the socialist bloc, which at that time was already becoming a reality, if we keep germany in nato, then it by the north atlantic treaty organization, jurisdiction would not extend e

foreign secretary james baker and others assured me that we would not move an inch east. and the germans showed indifference , maybe even rubbed their hands . i’m not me and it’s not my house, they didn’t promise anything, which means they didn’t violate anything, but there are several decisive evidence of lies at once, firstly, a transcript of gorbachev’s negotiations with us secretary of state james baker, when the soviet the leader stressed that the expansion to the east. the ussr, the unacceptable head of american diplomacy, told him literally the following, neither the president, nor i, nor intends to derive unilateral benefits from the current processes, that is, due to the collapse of the socialist bloc, which at that time was already becoming a reality, if we keep germany in nato, then by its organization the north atlantic treaty will not extend jurisdiction one inch to the east. promised. baker gorbachev another direct evidence found in the british archives at the national a document from 1991 was found in the archives of great britain, in which representatives

i have kohl with them , us foreign secretary james baker and others have assured me that nato will not move an inch to the east. the americans did not fulfill this promise, and the germans showed indifference , perhaps even rubbing their hands . i'm not me and the hut is not mine, they didn't promise anything, so nothing violated, but there are several decisive evidence of lies at once, firstly, a transcript of gorbachev’s negotiations with us secretary of state james baker, when at a meeting with him the soviet leader emphasized that expansion to the east is unacceptable for the ussr, the head of american diplomacy told him literally the following is not the president, nor i, nor intends to derive unilateral benefits from current processes, that is, due to the collapse of the socialist bloc, which at that time was already becoming a reality, if we keep germany in nato, then its organization of the north atlantic the treaty will not extend jurisdiction one inch to the east. promised. baker gorbachev another direct evidence found in the british archives in the national archives of great

i have kohl with them , us foreign secretary james baker and others have assured me that nato will notove an inch to the east. the americans did not fulfill this promise, but the germans showed indifference, maybe even rubbing their hands . i am not me and the hut is not mine, they did not promise anything, which means they did not violate anything, but decisive proof.

in particular james baker us secretary of state by the soviet leaders. official positions really in the usa and er, in the whole euro-atlantic community there would be a discussion. e, who achieved what finally means on his knees and with the help of precisely the expansion of the maximum expansion of american-centric alliances, and p. on the other hand, there were pragmatists who a claimed that, in general, the united states at that stage, and such expansion was not needed, but, of course, a desire. here are the appetites of politicians, including those surrounded by bush sr. yes, i’m not talking about him, but clinton to use this moment to the maximum moments of american japan, american dominance to strengthen it through the enthusiasm of these republics, and in nato it prevailed for a certain period. when they talked about it in general, they seriously discussed it. and then e prevailed, that e. in general, why abandon nato , it turns out to be a deterrent force. yes , secondly, they began to revise the entire history of their strategy, i will not go

agreements that are not backed by military success remain on paper. unfortunately us secretary of state james baker said twice that nato will not go east, in fact. this was a condition for the withdrawal of soviet troops from germany, although the agreements were verbal and baker said that he meant only germany. although the final communiqué spoke of eastern europe as a whole against the backdrop of the end of the cold war. no one betrayed this meaning more it seemed important then, the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe in the artillery tanks of combat aircraft of the country, the participants in this complex document. opportunities to conduct, large-scale combat were being decided. actions in europe, many experts began to call it the cornerstone of european security, but in the ninety-fourth year after the collapse of the ussr, when the clinton administration gave the green light to nato expansion, its task was not fulfilled, some members of the alliance did not join the treaty. and many have not even ratified it as compromise was signed. founding act russia nato however, this did not

in particular james baker us secretary of state by the soviet leaders.lly an official position in the us and, uh, in general, there was discussion in the euro-atlantic community would be. e, seeking what is final. this is for the russians, as if on their knees and with the help of just expanding the maximum expansion of american-centric alliances, and on the other hand there were pragmatists who a claimed that in general the united states at that stage, and such expansion was not needed, but, of course, desire. here are the appetites of politicians, including those surrounded by bush sr. yes, i'm not talking about clinton and take advantage of this moment to the maximum moments of american japan american dominance to strengthen it through involvement these republics, while in nato it prevailed for a certain period. when about it. in general, seriously argued, and then e prevailed that e. in general, why are they abandoning nato , it turns out to be a deterrent force. yes , secondly, they began to revise the entire history of their strategy, i will not go

the continuation for and if you remember the, the date of incident he got was february 9th, 1991, james baker, and all the minister of foreign affairs. the secretary of state of promise promised to gorbachev. good. nato will not move when the page to the east in presence of guests to the gentleman by the same presence of uh, order. i'll do, i'll put it in his friend. was a frenchman, no american promise? and i mean, since this is incredible today, of course, since the past 14, they are preparing your brain for this coughing. and it is a prototype which doesn't see you because we have very good propaganda. you know, price here in here. well, i actually wouldn't say it's good propaganda. i mean, i think during the cold war is a lot more subtle. it's a lot subtle at all anymore. right now. you know, lee, one of the things, it's very curious, you know, and talk to you about this. somebody to hear a t of it's members countries, but they don't want to talk about you pan european security. and that is the problem here and extending the alliance isn't going to create security actually in security. an

strive for independence, it was not ready, although there were people and then secretary of state james baker who was the secretary of the treasury before that, did not want to go to congress and ask for money to open 14 new ugus, and he did not do it. the cia, which understood that presence was needed, provided the initial funds for opening embassies in new countries, it was 250 thousands to the embassy what can i tell you was not enough but thank god they did it because it gave us at least some funds to start our presence there soon we began to understand that these are large diverse countries one of popular narratives of the kremlin - it is a feeling of resentment towards the west, they say that the west promised something and did not give it, they say that the west was insulted by the former minister of foreign affairs of russia andriy kozev, i heard something else, but this is what we hear now, how the us administration treated russian officials and the russian government then, from your experience , fashion, i got the impression that we reached out to russia compared to how we built rel

and if you remember the, the date of incident he got was february 9th, 1991, james baker and all the minnes stop, identifies the secretary of state of thomas promised to go. but chuck, good. nature would not move when the page to be in presence of guest to the german order. i'll do, i'll put it in his name was frenchman. it's the all american promise. and i mean, since this is incredible today, of course, since the past 14, they are preparing your brain for this coughing. and it gets this issue. the wish doesn't see you because we have very good propaganda. you know, price here in here. well, i actually wouldn't say it's good propaganda. i mean, i think during the cold war is a lot more subtle. it's about subtle at all anymore. right now. you know, lee, one of the things, it's very curious, you know, and talk to you about this. um, it is, you know, nato is about security of its members countries, but they don't want to talk about you pan european security. and that is the problem here and extending the alliance isn't going to create security actually in security and think about secur

when james baker and all the minnesota identifies the 2nd state of thomas promised to go to my job that nato will not move when the page to the east in presence of guess to the german maybe same president softball, or i'll do, i'll put it in his main walk for breakfast, and i mean, since this is in credit today, of course, since the past 14, they are preparing your brain for this coughing. and it is a publication of total provocation. the wish doesn't see you because we have very good propaganda. you know, price here in here. well, i actually wouldn't say it's good propaganda. i mean, i think during the cold war is a lot more subtle. it's about settle it all other things. it's very curious cuz, you know, nato is about security of its members countries, but they don't want it to curity. and, and that is the problem here and extending the alliance isn't going to create security actually in security. and that is the greatest fault of nato. it doesn't think about the security of others. lee, go ahead and i found sir. yeah, i agree. so during the cold war, nieto was created specifically to c

weeks ago when you said that you was for the continuation of the the date of been sent me one, james baker, and all the minister of foreign affairs. the secretary of state of thomas promised to go by job that may tell will not move when the age to get to the german maybe st presence of thought or i'll do, i'll put it in his name was a french minister. no american promise. and i mean, since this is incredible to day and for are preparing your brain for this coughing, and it is a publication of total provocation, which doesn't see you because we have very good propaganda. you know, price here in here. well, i actually wouldn't say it's good propaganda. i mean, i think during the cold words a lot more subtle, it's about subtle. it all the things. it's very curious, you know, and talk to you about this. um, it, it is, you know, nato is about security of its members countries, but they don't want to talk about you pay in europe and security. and that is the problem here and extending the alliance isn't going to create security actually in security. and that is the greatest security of others. l

the continuation of for, and if you remember, the date of incident he got was february 9th, 1991 james baker. and all the minnesota thomas promised to go would not move when the page to be in presence guess to the german, maybe st. presence of all or i'll do, i'll put the american promise. and i mean, since this isn't pro today, of course, since 2014, they are preparing your brain for this coughing. and it is a publication, a total provocation. the wish doesn't see you because we have very good propaganda . you know, price here in here. well, i actually wouldn't say it's good propaganda. i mean, i think during the cold war is a lot more subtle. it's like, you know, lee, one of the things, it's very curious, you know, and talk to you about this. um, it, it is, you know, nato is about security of its members countries, but they don't want to talk about you pay in europe and security and ending the alliance isn't going to create security actually in security. and that is the greatest fault of nato. it doesn't think about the security of others. we go ahead and i found sir. yeah, i agree. so dur

james baker, secretary of state under bush, promised we will not move nato 1 inch to the east.ce then, we have moved at 1,000 miles in 14 countries. when we started that plan in 1997, bill perry said to the clinton administration, if you move nato to the east, i am resigning. george was the most important diplomat of american history. he said the same thing. you don't need to make an enemy out of russia. russia should be treated, we won the cold war. >> china has been showing nothing but hostility. unfair trade practices, they have been confronting navy ships and international waterways. they had those spy drones fly around the country. they threatened to shoot hypersonic missiles at the u.s. if you were president, would you come to the defense of taiwan? >> no presidential candidate with any prudence would answer that question. [applause] our policy towards taiwan is strategic ambiguity and that makes sense. that has been our policy. >> do you see china as our top geopolitical foe? >> yes. that is another reason the war in ukraine is insane. we have pulled china into -- >> sea

you can bring james baker and henry kissinger down to help meade at this. i'm not sure they could. the administration knows they have politics, republicans emerged as the go-to party when it comes to israel. number two, the administration is really not interested in involving itself in a major way in an issue that's doomed to fail. far more interested, as you pointed out, as jeremy diamond pointed out, in the other peace process, the one between israel and the arab states. if the west bank is on fire, can they move forward? i think that's an unanswered question. in the coming weeks we'll findout. >> we certainly will find out. aaron david miller, appreciate your expertise on this matter. thank you. >> thanks alex. >>> ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy is speaking exclusively with cnn as putin's forces unleash attacks. >>> the ad from republican presidential candidate ron desantis some in his own party are calling dangerous and h homo hohomophobic. you're in "the situation room." . the #1 pharmacist recommended vitamin and supplement brand. hi, i'm stacey, and i've lost 60 pou

james baker, who is undersecretary of state under bush ker, sec, famously promised we will not move nato one inch to the east. well, since then we've in 1000 miles and 14 countries now, wei. started that plan in 1997. bill perry, who was the secretary of defense under clinton, said to the clinton administration, if you mov1997,e nader the eas, i'm resigning because you are forcing the russians to come to war with us. george kennan was the most important diplomat in american history, the architect of the containment policy during world war two.he so the same thing. you do not nee said thid to man enemy out of russia. >> russia should be treated the way we won the cold war. it get tres. let me ask you a question. china has been showing nothing but hostility covered intellectual property thefbut, unfair trade practices. >> they've been confronting our navy shipsunthey in internal waterways. >> they've been confronting our fighter jets, international airways. >> they had the spy drone go to fly all around the country, and joe didn't shoot it down. >> they threatened to shoot hypersonicound t

i was going to ask your panelists about the promise made by james baker to gorbachev in return for thefication of germany, nato promises not to go one inch eastward. it seems like that promise should not been taken -- it have been taken lightly. the antigens of nato -- intentions of nato it is to russian related to yugoslavia to break it into its component parts. have a nice day. thank you. host: anything you want to add? guest: do not blame nato for russia's aggression. putin started this war for no good reason and by the way, while we're on the subject, before the war, german chancellor goes to moscow and he says to putin, we will block ukraine entry into nato forever if you do not launch the war. putin wants to war anyway. --launched the war anyway. it is about ukraine's existence as an independent country. the best way to stop because aggression is to draw the line and say we are done with ambiguity. guest: these two issues, the question of the promise and german offer for the war broke out are intimately related. 1990 gorbachev took assurances did not get it in writing. now right

i was going to ask your panelists about the promise made by james baker to gorbachev in return for thefication of germany, nato promises not to go one inch eastward. it seems like that promise should not been taken -- it have been taken lightly. the antigens of nato -- intentions of nato it is to russian related to yugoslavia to break it into its component parts. have a nice day. thank you. host: anything you want to add? guest: do not blame nato for russia's aggression. putin started this war for no good reason and by the way, while we're on the subject, before the war, german chancellor goes to moscow and he says to putin, we will block ukraine entry into nato forever if you do not launch the war. putin wants to war anyway. --launched the war anyway. it is about ukraine's existence as an independent country. the best way to stop because aggression is to draw the line and say we are done with ambiguity. guest: these two issues, the question of the promise and german offer for the war broke out are intimately related. 1990 gorbachev took assurances did not get it in writing. now right

one of the individuals that i take on a persona is would have been an elder to james borden cyrus bustle of philadelphia baker being able to tell his story someone that would have worked with james later in his life. someone james is excuse me. cyrus's daughter would have worked with new young james borton as well. so, you know in that particular costume, you know, there's a nice little apron that goes with it and it's just something rich about being in costume and if something that you can transfer and to change someone's you know concept of what a person especially people of african descent what that looks like there's sort of limiting limited thoughts of based on a person standing if he was enslaved or if they were free of what their work was like and these individuals contributed in so many days from their skill set training prep from their contributions and just engagement in with their community. so all of that can be encompassed by just being in in costume and just giving life and image to something that is not something that is given a visual very often. this interesting this idea of community because

baker. he sent us a question, but i'll put to you in a take a listen to what eric had say. given the james web space telescope only see certain colors that are on the spectrum of light marable, the humans out of sight as go about color rising, the images that we could see online renee, uh, forgiveness. sorry jesse, thats sorry for the address. sure. okay. um, so what we have to do is we have to take the wavelength that james webb test by sales rep is looking at what is in the infrared heat. and we have to match those into optical wavelengths that we can see with our eyes. so we, we take that, that section of the wavelength that we can't see and we re map it in something we can see. so these beautiful images are not what you would see with your eye if you were out in space looking at these nebula, you wouldn't see that. but they are giving us this rich amount of detail about the different wavelength that these optics are a meeting at an end. so it's not that there was no and for read before it was, it's just that much more advanced. right. if you will, like the hubble, have this capacity to