this is a footnote, jeffrey.lar bond issuance and dollar valuation has gone up dramatically in the last two years. and somehow seems to increase. well over 75% of commercial transaction in the world are denominated in dollars now. but is there an alternative? chinese, i wonder when your thoughts are there. the euro. baskets of currencies. how do you view this now against the background of what we set in place by this meeting in 1971? >>. >> it's a great question. i'm going to get to that. i left something out which i think we should just interject. when you asked me about sim similarities and differences, i should have talked about inflation. because in 1971, inflation was rising. and, you know, the inflation stemmed from the vietnam war and president johnson's failure to raise taxes in a timely way. and so when nixon became president, inflation was beginning to be a real problem. and nixon held a very strong view that in the tradeoff between inflation and employment, employment was more important. he had been vi

jeffrey clarke aided in that effort. today's interim staff report sheds new light on former president donald trump's efforts to overturning the 2020 election. election. >> pressuring the colleagues in the department of justice to force in overturn of the 2020 election. let me put this in perspective. the election was in novemberle the results were announced. most of the world accepted it but the former president donald trump never did. he filed a succession of lawsuits to prove election had been stolen. he failed in every effort in court. everyone. that wasat stage i. having failed in court to the most outlandish series imaginable that was considered normal for the likes of rudy giuliani and then in the second phase it was to convince the department of justice and the attorney general to intervene in the election results and to reach out directly as the president did himself personally to the election officials and stays with you that he should have one but he didn't. so all that effort was underway when william bar pres

jeffrey, welcome. i want to open this up by asking why you wrote the book, and why you think this is a subject of crucial importance. jeff? >> you know i've written several books about the global economy. they have dealt very much on -- and i wanted to try something else. i wanted to identify a single event and really focusing on it, focus on great detail so you knew the people and knew what was in their head and knew what was influencing them in their environment and background, and make it so that you could really feel the decision. in doing that, you've got to look at the larger picture. i was looking around at what event what landmark event could i write about? one that most people didn't know a lot about. and this event that i wrote about it camp david was a weekend in which president nixon and six of his top advisers met in secret. nobody knew about the meeting. and they made a very important decision. since 1944, the dollar had been based on gold. and the link between the dollar and gold was 35

jeffrey, welcome. want to open this up i ask you why you wrote the book and why you think this is the subject of crucial importance. >> thank you david. you know i've written several hooks and they are all about the global economy and the political dimension of the global economy but they had dwelt very much on trends and i wanted to try something else. i wanted to identify a single event really focus in on it and focus in on great detail so that you knew the people and you knew what was in their head and you knew what was influencing them in terms of the global environment and their background and you could really feel the decision but in doing that you really got also a larger picture. i was looking around for what event wet landmark event could i write about one that most people really didn't know a lot about which brought to bear domestic economic policy, international economic policy and foreign policy. this sent event i wrote about camp david was the weekend on which president nixon visited his t

jeffrey, welcome. i want to open this up by asking you why you wrote the book and why you think this is a subject of crucial importance. jeff. >> thank you. i've written several books and they're all about the global economy. they have dwelled very much on big trends. i wanted to try something else. i wanted to identify a single event. focus in on it in great deal so that you knew the people. you knew what was in their heads. you knew what was influencing them in terms of the global environment and their own background. you could really feel the decision. you also got a larger picture. i was looking around for what event was -- what lan mark event could i write about. one that most people didn't know a lot about and secondly, which brought to bear domestic economic policy, international economic policy and foreign policy. this event was a weekend in which president nixon and six of his top advisers met in secret. nobody knew about this meeting at the time. since 1944, the dollar had been backed by gold

yeah, and i reported on jeffrey's report, i'm looking at that invention of carbon footprint. so it's to hear about that here . what all companies have been doing in the last few years as a face, lots of legal challenges across the world, saying they're not taking climate change seriously. they're pointing to a very small subset of their pollution and saying that they're addressing essentially their production emissions. this is just a small subset of what the oil industry is actually responsible for when it comes to climate change. really, the biggest impact comes from the products that we consume, like gas, like the gas powering our electricity, coal and oil. but when they're saying they're reducing their carbon footprint, they're talking specifically about production facility. so they aren't looking at the full problem here. and that's, that's just a piece of what jeffries talking about when you saying they're not really taking responsibility for their actual impact on climate change. well, you know, i know that there have been a lot of different attempts to address the way

jeffrey: i do. the fed has been very clear.e average inflation targeting is a major change in the policy reaction function and it says clearly the fed wants to see more inflation surprises, more inflation overshoot. in a stagflationary environment they are going to tolerate that higher degree of inflation. let separate the conversation. -- the two concepts. i think if we face that environment in the future of stagflation, they will err on the growth side than on the inflation side. tom: none of this is not only in what you and i read but the three and four tomes we read on the bond market. it goes back to one single chart. this is the chart that matters for chairman powell. america. down we went in the financial crisis. on radio it is simple. we plunged and made it back only 70% or so. jeffrey rosenberg, is this market worried about economics or just simply worried about the job count in america? jeffrey: it has been clear, particularly on the tapering, on the dynamics and the restoration of some of those covid impacts. it is m

so in your mind, this is very deliberate, including the terminology that's being used jeffrey. i see you nodding and i know that your research early on back when this was in its nascent days, uncovered something kind of revealing about where the term carbon footprint comes from. and this idea that we all need to be very aware of, you know, our role, but maybe it's a deflection from, you know, the actual problem. i want to ask you in that, in that video from the c o phrases like net 0 and carbon neutral. what are these words mean to what's not there? right? right. so, so these are thank you for showing those because these are brilliant illustrations of 2 of the key techniques used by green washes, which are language in imagery. so to take language 1st, they use these terms like net 0, carbon neutral. they just throw out tons like the power agreements that make us really start to see these, these communicators in some way consistent with the things they're talking about. but the reality is, you know, as, so if you just mention, the study after study has shown that no major fossil

i live in a, just a great segue there. jeffrey on b p. 's, twitter account. tweeting out right here, you can see the 1st step to reducing your emissions is to know where you stand. find out your carbon footprint with our new calculator and share your pledge today . ah, it certainly feels like it's making me question what i'm doing and what my footprint is. and it's kind of putting the focus on myself as we just heard sylvia say, and your research, as we referenced earlier, you know, they created this term, carbon footprint. and what was the aim back then? how has the propagandized, you call it a green washing evolve since those early days back in 2000? sure. and i certainly wouldn't take credit for all of these findings. a number of investigative journalists and scholars have been behind on her thing, the fact that the very notion of a personal carbon footprint was 1st promoted and popularized by none other than b. p. as i said, as part of a major $100000000.00 per year marketing campaign between 20042006, they did it across all media. th

jeffrey, just how big of a deal is this? what kind of information would jeffrey clark, this former senior justice department official, actually know? >> well, he is a central figure in determining, frankly, the central question, which is who authorized this attempt to overturn the election. part of that is the effort that we want on in congress. and clark would certainly know about that. the other part is, who orchestrated the riot? and those are both parts of this investigation. but clark certainly is a key figure in untangling how this effort to use clearly unconstitutional means to persuade congress to overturn the election, who was behind it, who authorized it, and who was clark working with. >> it could be very, very significant. gloria, clark is set to be, as i pointed out, the first trump administration official to comply with a subpoena, with a subpoena for an interview with the select committee. could this change, potentially, the trajectory of this investigation? >> look, i think each person they've subpoenaed so f

jeffrey clark. and so they sent clark a subpoena today asking him to produce documents and appear before the committee itself on october 29th. if he does appear, it would shed a whole lot of light on what exactly happened at the justice department in the last days of the trump administration. >> obviously he's a person of interest. he's the central person in this saga, and at some point in the committee before a grand jury someplace his testimony is going to be obtained. >> now, the senate judiciary committee, you saw sheldon whitehouse talking to rachel. he's a member of that committee. they tried to get clark to sit down for a voluntary interview with him over the summer, but he did not respond. according to politico, he has yet to field questions from congressional investigators, scrutinizing trump's final weeks in office. his lawyer declined to comment on the subpoena. betsy woodruff swan reported for politico, broke the news of jeffrey rosen's testimony today, and she joins me now. it was not n

virginia giuffre claims she was trafficked to the prince by the convicted paedophile jeffrey epstein,hen she was 17. the duke of york has consistently denied the allegations. a civil lawsuit in the united states is still ongoing. graham satchell reports.

donahue then asked me whether i knew jeffrey clark. i told him no i did not know jeffrey clark. is he? mr. donahue explained to me that clark was the assistant general for the environmental natural resources division, and he was also at the time, the acting chief of the civil division. he said jeff clark had quote, the presidents year. i asked him, what he meant by that. and he mentioned that jeff clark, in the justice department sign on to some letter suggesting the general assembly of the state legislature in georgia should call a special session, and they should refuse to certify the electoral college votes. also, mr. clark wanted the justice department to intervene or join, and i can't remember exactly, in a civil lawsuit. that was filed by the trump campaign, and i said well that seems, that's very, that's crazy. that's just highly crazy. i think the words i used, were bat bleep crazy. and that was the description. richard donahue told me that jeff clark would be calling me, and that maybe i could talk to him about what we found, in to try to dissuade him from trying to sug

jeffrey: bargmann has strong views and a sense of humor.rofessional studio “d.i.r.t.”, for “dump it right there”. and she happily embraces one nickname, the “queen of slag,” the leftover by-product from the mining of metals. julie: if i could make a crown out of slag, i'd be very happy. i mean, i think it's a recognition of the industrial territory that i adventured into. jeffrey: now, she's the first-ever recipient of an international landscape architecture prize given to honor her work as a designer, educator, and activist in addressing abandoned toxic, industrial and urban sites. the award, creat by the washington, d.c.-based “cultural landscape foundation,” is named for renowned landscape architect cornelia hahn oberlander, who died this year of covid at age 99. bargmann lives and works in charlottesville, virginia, and has taught at the university of virginia for 25 years. she often takes her architecture students to scummy, toxic sites most have never experienced before. but it all began for her in a very different landscape, as a chi

jeffrey clark has some serious problems now. one, the committee is trying to compel him to testify, as they should. jeffrey clark tried to commit a fraud. he drafted a letter saying d.o.j. has identified concerns about election fraud in georgia. that's just false. jeffrey clark needs think about potential criminal exposure, too, committing a fraud is a crime, conspiracy is a crime, election interference is a crime. he has the right to take the fifth. he might be well advised to do so here. >> his attorneys argue he's bound by executive privileges belonging to president trump. the former president is not the sitting president. ben was not a white house official in january. he was actually already -- he was actually charged with something, with fraud, which the president then pardoned him for. what do you think bannon's end game is here? >> we mentioned in the intro to the segment the goal here in almost all cases is to delay. the hope is that they are able to run out the clock on these investigations, run out the clock on the pro

jeffrey clark has some serious problems now. one, the committee is trying to compel him to testify as they should because jeffrey clark tried to commit a fraud. he drafted a letter saying doj has identified concerns about election fraud in georgia. that's just false. and so, jeffrey clark needs to think about potential criminal exposure here, too. committing a fraud is a -- is a crime. conspiracy a crime. election interference a crime. he has the right to take the fifth. he might be well advised to do that here. >> gary, you have watched the rise and fall of steve bannon. his attorney said he will not cooperate, arguing that he is bound by, quote, executive privileges belonging to president trump. it's obvious, you know, it's dubious because the former president is not the sitting president. bannon was not a white house official in january. what -- he was actually, you know, already -- he was actually charged with something -- with fraud which the president then pardoned him for. what do you think bannon's end game is here? >> i

that's true for jeffrey clark. if he wants to avoid a criminal referral and be charged with criminal contempt of congress, you know, he needs to come up and comply with the subpoena and testify because otherwise he's in blatant contempt of congress. now, to your point, if he wants to take the fifth, of course that's his right. he can do so, but he doesn't have the ability to just blow off the subpoena like he seems to want to do. >> so matt, one of the changes in the 21st century compared to the nixon era is just how breathtakingly slow the courts are, at the district court level, the appeals court level on all of these enforcement issues on congressional subpoenas. what about the justice department will now be tested when the congress refers to the justice department for criminal prosecution of contempt of congress. we don't know how quickly the merrick garland justice department will be able to move on this, and in, you know -- in the past these kinds of things have been able to be handled very, very quickly. wha

jeffrey clark, another d.o.j. official is ignoring that instruction from the justice department and so far is refusing to testify. looks like he will be subpoena. if he doesn't comply with the subpoena, i hope he is prosecute . >> we will put both of those pieces of information to our next guest, adam schiff, a member of the house select committee investigating the deadly attack on the united states capitol on january 6th is our guest. he is the author of a brands new book "mi midnight in washington, how we almost lost our democracy and still could". congressman, thank you for sending time with us today. >> great to be with you. >> we read from some of the book. i want to go back into what you write about mcconnell and mccarthy and really drive into that. but i want to start with some of today's breaking news and something matt miller just touched on, which is the testimony of former acting attorney general jeffrey rosen. was he before the select committee today? >> you know, we are not confirming who is appearing

>> in 14th place >> reporter: faster runners will take home medals, susan and jeffrey will take homek susan wants to run up another hill right now. >> reporter: for the news, i'm boyd hooper, west salem, wisconsin. >>> 50 seconds left, everybody, on a race to the finish tonight. the fda authorizing pfizer's covid vaccine for emergency use in kids ages 5 to 11 it's now the cdc's turn to weigh in the armorer in charge of prop guns on the "rust" movie set breaking her silence in a statement from her lawyer hannah reid claims she has no idea how a live round got into alec baldwin's gun and blames the management for unsafe condition on the set >>> and president biden prepares for a summit with two world leaders this weekend i'm kelly evans in for shepherd smith. follow us on instagram and twitter at the news on cnbc and listen on apple, spotify our your favorite platform happy halloween, everybody, and stay dry the history she writes in her clear blue skies. the legends she births on hometown fields. and the future she promises. when we made grand wagoneer, proudly assembled in america, w

that's what jeffrey rosen was told. he was acting attorney general. the deputy attorney general was rich donaghue. in his interview with the investigation and the senate judiciary committee, his interview also unsealed today, he explains what it was like to talk to trump about this scheme, about this plot at the white house on january 3rd, three days before the january attack. he said, when i came in in, the president in the oval office has a guy sitting in front of him, jeff clark, who is willing to do it. he said it was a wide-ranging discussion about the justice department. the question was whether he should remove jeffrey rosen and put in jeff clark. there was some discussion about the letter to georgia. at that point it was difficult to separate the issue of the letter, and jeff clark being in the leadership position because it was very clear. he stated it repeatedly that if president trump made jeff clark the acting attorney general, jeff clark would send that letter on behalf of the justice department. so it wasn't a third option where he would

. >> reporter: jeffrey is susan's older brother by a year. are their parents, jess and jordan. >> when jeffrey was 22 months old, he suffered a sudden cardiac arrest that caused him to go 20 minutes without adequate oxygen to his brain. >> reporter: from that point on, susan's dedication to her brother hasn't wavered. >> we just kind of always have had that special close bond. >> reporter: a bond only strengthened as they click off the kilometers. >> we were trying to figure out a sport or after-school activity that he could participate in with me. >> reporter: susan took a cue from their parents, both runners, who included jeffrey in their races. >> he loves running. >> reporter: but susan on grass pushing more than her own body weight through a season's worth of races and practices. >> this is really unprecedented. >> reporter: with his coach. >> we were all worried. >> reporter: everyone worried but susan. >> let's go, susan >> hearing everyone screaming and cheering gives me a very big adrenaline rush. >> come on you got it. >> reporter:

jeffrey clark is ordered to testify, in a disposition, on october 29th. that gives him about two weeks, to practice invoking the fifth amendment. the committee obtained direct incriminating evidence against jeffrey clark today. in the testimony of jeff rosen, who was shouted donald trump's final act to the attorney general -- rosen told the committee the same things that he told the judiciary committee about jeffrey clark, that junior clark is living in far of criminal charges tonight, of attempted electoral fraud and conspiracy to commit election fraud. during our discussion now, jill wine-banks, -- and matt miller, former spokesman for attorney general eric holder. both are msnbc contributors. jill, i want to begin with you, i want to begin with this key question, that is a lot a lot of us confused. why were you so effective in getting compliance to subpoenas against president nixon and his administration, during the watergate investigation? and the democrats in congress have been so ineffective in relative terms, in pursuit of the same kind of subpoena

bar to look into jeffrey clark for what he did, yes? >> yes. and we did that very carefully, taking a look at his role. but clark, who emerged in this, he was suggested to the president by a pennsylvania republican congressman, and then all of a sudden sprung out of the department of justice to everyone's surprise and became the president's man. the president even promised him apparently that he would be the next attorney general. and what he did in terms of asking for the department of justice to get involved in this political exercise goes way beyond the bounds of fitness and his worthiness to serve as a lawyer in the district of columbia. >> you mentioned u.s. scott perry of pennsylvania, a republican. your report goes into detail about the role of a u.s. congressman played in trying to push the lies. >> well, and the president even referred to that at one point, that if we couldn't get the job done in other quarters, he had friends in congress who were going to carry the water for him. and there were others who were involved in it. and play

official jeffrey clark. remember him?was so desperate to get in trump's good grace that he drafted a letter that no one with any sense would have signed, claiming that the justice department found voter fraud in georgia, even though it had not. one of those who stood up to clark and the former president, former acting attorney general jeffrey rosen. cnn has learned the committee interviewed him for eight hours wednesday. >>> and today time is up for two allies central to this investigation. deposition for kash patel and steve bannon are on the schedule for today. bannon has already said he is a no-show, risking criminal contempt. it's time for three questions in three minutes. let's bring in cnn political analyst. margaret, the subpoena for jeffrey clark who pushed the nonexistent election fraud of president trump, what does this say about where this investigation is going? >> well, good morning, christine. it certainly says that the committee is trying to piece together a time line of precisely how these efforts to try t

this is a perfectly legal, common practice many prestigious universities. jeffrey superman is a ph. d. student will join him at a film, screening in $21700.00 bill for kennedy center announced a screening of a film dirty. essentially, it will tell you all the ins about how for the foreseeable future, we're going to be relying on fossil fuels, how renewables are way off in the distance. not right now, not really reliable. and frankly promoting hoss truth at best about, you know, it's ability of continue fossil fuel usage grange them with that or right? well, with right, if you're a susan's, if you has been permit your husband, surely this is a reasonable film until we dug just a little bit beneath the surface the academic talking heads, the ones that were presented as professors universities, without exception actually will have deep ties to the oil and gas industry from consultancy relationships to running sensors, reliance on fossil fuel funding to literally being on the boards of natural gas companies. and producer of the film was show oil company, the director of the film. he was

a man was chosen as the acting attorney general, jeffrey row is en, and at jeffrey rosen and donohueeputy attorney general. there was a full-court press on at that by president trump and his supporters to influence jeffrey rosen into intervening into this lexicon -- into this election contest. when i say full-court press, i'm talking about repeated telephone calls and meetings in the white house over a period of two weeks. this report which we have brought to the attention of the public as well as members of the committee obviously went into detail as to what happened during that two-week period of time. it was an incredible moment which most americans didn't even know was going on. we were a half step away from a full-blown constitutional crisis, because what the president was trying to do was to convince the attorney general to contact the leaders in the states where he thought, the president thought he had won the election and to tell them to not certify the results and to pick an alternative set of electors in some instances. in each of these cases the president was, president tr

jeffrey clark has lost his lawyer.rey clark's lawyer robert driscoll, quote, had dropped his representation of the former justice official because of the change the committee granted clark a brief postponement according to a committee staffer. it was not clear why driscoll and clark split but people familiar with the matter suggested that it had to do with whether clark would cooperate with the committee's requests. jeffrey clark was reportedly trying to stage a coup within the justice department and get himself promoted to acting attorney general by drafting a letter to georgia officials to urge them to investigate nonexistent voter fraud. donald trump was considering a plan to fire his acting attorney general and install jeffrey clark as attorney general so that letter could be sent. it was only when donald trump was confronted with the possibility of the immediate protest resignations of virtually everyone else at the top of the justice department if he fired the acting attorney general that donald trump then retrea

and i think jeffrey clark has a lot to answer for. i hope that he does cooperate and he tells the january 6th commission what the commission wants to know. >> okay. committee chair penny thompson is giving new insight into how former president trump could factor into this investigation. take a look at what he said. >> are you ruling out or ruling in the possibility of eventually subpoenaing trump? >> well, i would say this at this point, wolf, nobody is off limits to a subpoena from this committee. >> so i'm going to ask it to you this way. is there any way you see this probe ending without a subpoena for donald trump? >> that's really up to the january 6th commission. i do note that 57 u.s. senators on a bipartisan basis voted to convict donald trump in an impeachment trial, even though we didn't hit two-thirds, we still got 57. in any other context, that is not close. and so they thought donald trump under the facts incited an insurrection. i do think that we need to hear from the president on what he was thinking when he was inciti

according to jeffrey super and b. p has a say in what will be researched. exxonmobil said at funds, universities to promote green technologies. and shell tells us that wants to help solve the serious climate challenge. why is this a problem? i mean, if they use their money for doing some research for good, what was the problem when the very people, the very institutions, the supposed to be solving the climate crisis, a fundamentally reliant on the industry that has the most to lose from their work. that's a pretty big conflict of interest. jeffrey super thinks that the many millions are intended to influence students, teachers, and scientists. this strategy come straight out of the playbook. the a p i. strategy paper also states informing teachers and students about uncertainties in climate change will erect a barrier against efforts to impose kyoto like measures a measure put in place to limit the emissions of c o 2. and that's why in the medical research community, there are a stablished practices there established

this is the now famous photograph of virginia jeffrey and prince andrew.ims she was trafficked to the uk and are sexually assaulted by prince andrew, a claim that the prince andrew, a claim that the prince denies. this is her last year with her legal team. she is bringing a civil case against the duke of york in america. the court documents claim he sexually abused her, knowing she was a child. the met police have conducted a series of reviews into the allegations against prince andrew and started another one when details of the civil case became clear. speaking last year, the met commissioner said that nobody is above the law. now in a statement, the met say they have concluded their review and will be taking no further action. virginia giuffre is alleged to have been trafficked to the uk by the american financier and sexual offender, jeffrey epstein. epstein took his life in a new yorkjailhouse in 2019. epstein and prince andrew were friends for a number of years. there have been previous reviews into the allegations against prince andrew and jeffrey eps

jeffrey clark. we've talked about clark before in this program. he is a key figure. clay's a lifelong republican lawyer, served in pride's practice in the george w. bush doj, nothing particular remarkable about his, career he became the acting assistant attorney general for the doj's civil division, which is a very big job, at the very end of donald trump's term, that's when a lot of people were fleeing. once trump lost the election, jeffrey clark became one of the leading voices, if not the leading voice, pushing the justice department, to play its role in trump's attempts to overturn the election. clark even reportedly plotted directly with trump, two outs the acting attorney general, jeffrey rosen at the, time and take his job. the senate judiciary committee detailed some of clark's actions in that bombshell report last week. they pointed out that he met with trump personally and then urged the department of justice leadership to interview in the georgia election. he drafted a kind of template le

that is a -- >> does he have any legal standing, jeffrey? >> what? >> does he have any legal standing? as you said. he didn't even work for the white house or no governmental standing. >> none. none at all. but, you know, with the president -- the former president asserting executive privilege, it still has to go through the courts and in my experience, even frivolous legal claims take weeks, if not months to resolve themselves but the bannon situation, mark meadows was the white house chief of staff. there is a conceivable executive privilege claim. with bannon, there is nothing. absolutely nothing that he could claim except that he can make, you know, he can keep the former president happy by refusing to testify and the courts unless i'm proven wrong, perhaps i will be, it certainly has happened before will not move quickly enough for bannon really to be forced to testify in this c committee here. >> there is another story about how this president and this person has used the courts and how -- it's just amazing. there is another -- >> don, you know

. >> the select committee subpoenaed jeffrey clark. there's been a lot of reporting about his role in trump's attempts to overturn the election. tell us about him. >> jeffrey clark is the trump stooge who was installed at the trump justice department number three position. wrote a letter attempting to get the justice department to declare that it found evidence of voter fraud as a means of forestalling the certification of the electoral votes. jeffrey rosen, the acting attorney general refused to sign that letter. trump also had an idea of replacing rosen with jeffrey clark. ultimately, it didn't work and as is the case throughout this attempted coup, a select number of officials with integrity stood up and did not go along with the plan but jeffrey clark by all the evidence that we've seen so far was not one of those people. he was trying to affect the trump's attempt to overturn the results in key states, overturn the results of the election and that's why the select committee wants so much to talk to him. >> elliott, congressman ada

. >> a new subpoena issued for former doj official jeffrey clark.t was clark, you may recall, who drafted the letter falsely claiming that the justice department found voting irregularities in georgia. >>> the january 6th committee met for eight hours with the man clark wanted to sign the letter, jeffrey rosen. there is a battle over executive privilege. the former president is trying to block the release of documents from the national archives. let's talk about this with elie honig. elie, we know at least two of these people who were subpoenaed are supposed to show up and testify today. >> today is deadline day. the committee will have to make big decisions. now when the committee first sent out subpoenas, it gave them short deadlines on purpose. it wanted the documents on the 7th. reportedly, they haven't gotten any or very few of those documents. today is the day bannon and patel are supposed to testify. meadows and scavino tomorrow. if they do not testify, the committee will have to make important decisions. here's why they are so important. ada

the jeffrey clark is interviewing witnesses about.is a lot of pushback, white house counsel pat cipollone, called clerks note a murder suicide pacts. deputy attorney general donahue, -- all the attorney general would resign, if he replaced rosen with clark, the coup lackey. and the two white house lawyers indicated they would also resign. so everyone sitting in the room, you've got trump, and his kolasky clark who are like let's do the coup, and all the other lawyers are like, we are all resign if you do the coup. according to donahue trump did not reject the core of action, in till the final 15 minutes of the 2 to 3-hour meeting. that sounds exhausting in incredibly tedious, but i guess it worked out kind of in the end? that was just one of nine calls and meetings listed in the report. okay, this wasn't like a one-off, it wasn't casual stuff. nine calls and meetings that he held with acting attorney general rosen and donahue, pressuring, pressuring, pressuring them to overturn the election results. he told them, that sentence in the

we have jeffrey rosen. he ran the doj after bill barr left in december of last year with the statement of how great donald trump was. rosen's deputy, number two, is that guy, a man named richard donoughe. previously served as u.s. attorney for the eastern district of new york. then there's a third character. his name is jeffrey clark. a lesser known official in the department and he went full insurrectionist and plotted with trump to use the department of justice to full meant trump's coup even if that meant getting rid of his boss, jeffrey rosen. senate report provides new context and new revelations. it details a meeting on january 3rd in the oval office, in this meeting you've got rosen, right, the guy trying to get justice, deputy and clark was there and pat sipilone and his deputy. trump opened the meeting and i want to read this to you by saying, one thing we know is you, rosen, aren't going to do anything to overturn the election. over the course of the next three hours the group had a wide ranging d

find case an activist jeffrey few bran. thanks jeffrey. last year, mass protest, the nigeria force the government to shut down and the tourist li, violent police unit. one year later, when nigerian citizens are still terrified of the police in a pow show discussion, the gap explain why they do. yeah. but least we have is one who do not have any understanding or an issue monthly. and i think when people use for money, and i say this because i'm a direct survival of police with the of the highest order in 22 all my but i was arrested by this number s b, but o c charge james to awful told my parents that he had killed my brother and there was nothing to do about it and up to known. nothing has been done about it at the height of incense with it. he was the. ringback number, it goes on security and he was taught by the number, i mean i'm, we, i sure that he will be proved and prosecuted. right. is the one year he's working freely and the rest would be nice. i court nothing has been done about it. i assure you the manger, emily system is design

that's what jeffrey rosen was told. he was acting attorney general. the deputy attorney general was rich donaghue. he explains what it was like to talk to trump about this scream -- about this scheme. out this . it's not good for you, mr. president. this is dramatic stuff. right? the president in the oval office has a guy sitting in front of him, jeff clark, who is willing to do it. hatched the scheme with president trump to do it. he drafted the letter. he has asked for the other official signatures on it and threatened the attorney general. if you don't sign, i will be attorney general and i will sign it. they will tell republicans in the state legislatures where biden won that the justice department is treating the election as a crime scene. they should throw out the election results, take steps to keep trump in office. this guy is willing to do it. trump is very willing to put him in charge of the justice department so he can carry out that plot. what stops is that everybody else in the justice department says they will quit, make a stink, it migh

al jeffrey fled the country on the day of the coop and has lived in canada ever since. however, he says mohammed bin solomon was not ready to leave the fugitive load. he started with leering me to come back black mailing with my children, and in the end, when he left that i will never come back. he said the tiger quotes to canada to kill me. sighed algebraic claims he was next on mohammed. ben solomon's murder, less often jamal could shoak g. a. washington post columnist and long time critic of the prince was brutally murdered inside a saudi consulate in turkey. the format, saudi intelligence officer, no longer fears his own death, but his warning, those who may be off to him, that taking him down may cost him a lot pre recorded it's death video revealing the dirtiest secrets of the saudi crown prince and some sensitive information on the united states, it could be released in case of his murder. what algebra is worried about is his family. 2 of his adult children were arrested on the day. he left the saudi arabia and remain a prison. saudi arabia remains a key us ally