months and subsequent years, thank you very much, well, you saw putin, it’s interesting what putin, jeffrey sachs takira carlson, look what you think about putin? very smart, he runs russia very effectively, since he came out of the kgb, he understands how the usa operates, we have become a state where the cia has absolutely exclusive influence, and putin understands this, he does not like it, but he understands it, and his experience, especially because he... comes from the kgb, he has no illusions about the united states. i wish we could prove him wrong, but we don't. how influential the cia is in the activities of the us government is definitely very influential. it is a regime change tool. and the united states is the only country in the world that relies on regime change. governments, this is not the best calling for us, it almost always ends in disaster, bloodshed, ongoing instability, you know what i tell you? i kept thinking how, for example, putin differs from scholz, macron, the polish ones, what does putin have in common with, say, orban, with vucic and even with trump, but not with bi

do 0 for insights story the quite well that spring, and i guess now from a room where joined by jeffrey sachs, he's a full, i'm a special advisor to the you and 60 general now the director of the center for sustainable development at columbia university and romano and stuff about go see is the general secretary of the posting and national initiative and in london is you'll see macro back and associate fellow at the middle east and north africa program. i the you tasting time. chatham house of, i will welcome to will see if you're welcome to a inside story. you'll see, i wonder if i can start with you if you could help us set the scene. because until now, palestine has only held the status of an observer at the un. what does the pulsing, the overwhelming pulsing office say? your resolution? what does that mean in terms of the rights and privileges of forwarded to palestine? now in science a product doesn't change too much because it's the secure with the concept of that site. so there's a notion will actually be through a recognition as a states. but i think symbolically it is a very important

with all 3 of you, jeffrey sachs, some stuff about gucci, you'll see macro back. thank you very much for joining us on inside story. i'd like you to for watching and you can see the program again any time by visiting our website, how to 0, a dot com for further discussion. go to a facebook page. as facebook dot com forward slash a inside story, you'll also join the conversation on x i'll handle is at a j inside story. for me to talk with the whole team here, 5 of the unique perspective. why is it the doctors don't get to have a saying any of this? the medical workforce has been so and devalued by the british government from time on hub voices. tick tock had been a place for organizing politically, for getting people to vote for getting people to protest, connect with our community and tap into conversations you weren't find elsewhere. why is our government taking us to work on the basis of live? read the public has to get out there and do something about it. the stream on al jazeera, it's all sort of 10 year journey in which it has become the most important transl

this idea was expressed by american economist jeffrey sachs in an interview with tucker carlson.ne. the white house’s calculation, in his opinion, is the reluctance to solve problems diplomatically and begin a dialogue with moscow. until biden talks directly with putin and starts a dialogue, our lives are in great danger, and it is unimaginable to me that we are waging an open war and are not even trying to find a path to peace now. what do you think about putin? he is very smart, he runs russia very effectively because he came out of the kgb. jeffrey sack also recalled the story of the northern stream explosions and unequivocally stated: washington is behind the terrorist attack, and at the same time causing it is bewildering that germany, which suffered serious losses from this, did not really react in any way; this, the economist believes, is a clear illustration of how berlin is subordinate to the interests of the united states. for a strike on a tent camp in rafahiya that killed at least 45 people. israel used american ammunition. reports this. journalists interviewed expert

will have to fight if ukraine doesn’t want to, there are no people left in ukraine, that’s what jeffrey sachstragic: 500,000 ukrainians died for nothing. do you think this is a number? i think most likely yes, this is the largest number i know. but one of the most shocking things, if you ask any of the senators who voted to continue this war, at the expense of our taxes, how many of your beloved ukrainians were killed? they have no idea, they don't care to know, they don't care at all. worries, and sometimes they say that... we haven’t started yet, but if necessary, we will start and it won’t seem enough to anyone, please, so you asked what seems to me, of course, a rhetorical question, do people in ukraine know the truth , is there actually media there, freedom of speech and so on, i kind of know the answer, there is nothing there yet and there wasn’t even at the moment when i was arrested, i was in prison, but when i left prisons. it seems to me that i thought that this would happen quickly enough, but these were such naive ideas, now i see that this is happening, it is happening gradually,

, it’s unsuccessful there, these ones you know are not in russian, it’s all from there sits uh jeffrey sachsonomic adviser, it came through him, he gave and translated into russian and gave, that’s what they did, and what did they do for the russians, for the citizens or something, they worked for the benefit of the citizens, no, they worked for the benefit of the west, in benefit oneself, and it is also naive to think that new people will come and with one click everything will change, no, it seems to me, very much... economist mikhail khazin made a subtle remark. i have a lot of respect for this man and i want you to listen to his point of view. i can only say one thing: if we are talking about a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is inevitably the disappearance, not even of specific figures, but of a certain type of figure. you see, okay, clean it up now. is under the control of the imf, and of course, of course, this launched mechanism brought with it a lot of new and not always good things, for example, one could imagine tha

jeffrey sachs sits, under yeltsin he sat as the chief economic adviser, it came through him, he gaveunched mechanism brought with it a lot of new and not always good, for example, you can it would be imaginable that a veteran of the great patriotic war could collect a billion rubles in bribes, and while still in the position of deputy minister of defense, especially in wartime, while the war is going on, and this happens when the whole country is collecting rubles a penny for a drone... so that, for example, a person who came back from the great patriotic war would be tasked with building a dam to protect the inhabitants of cities, villages, towns of some region, which was spent almost a billion rubles on that it is not a dam, but that it is an earthen rampart, as happened in the orenburg province, this is what the minister of construction irek faizolin says about this. that dam that the vors say is not really a dam. a dam of a billion rubles is not worth 10 km, with enormous speed, a huge mass of water pressed not on the dam, but on an earthen rampart. but the construction took 4 ye

writing, real documents, and we fell for this, fell for this deception, everything from there sits jeffrey sachsc adviser sat through him it came he gave and translated into russian and gave this is what they did and what did they do for this for the russians for the citizens or something in favor of the citizens they worked no they worked in favor of the west in benefit yourself and too. it’s naive to think that new people will come and everything will change with one click, no, it seems to me that the economist mikhail khazin made a very subtle remark, i respect this man very much and i want you to listen to his point of view, i i can only say one thing: if we are talking about a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this will inevitably disappear. not even specific figures, but some type of figures, you know, okay, well, remove nabiyulina now, install ulyukaev, something will change, or is it senelnikova muryleva, well, or make another rotation, that is, assign nabiulina, accordingly, to move between the central bank, the ministry of fina

rudely done there unsuccessfully , you know, these are not in russian everything from there sits jeffrey sachsunder yeltsin the chief economic adviser sat through him, this came through him, he gave and translated into russian and gave this is what they did and what are they for the citizens or what? and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is inevitable disappearance, not even of specific figures, but some type of figure, you know, okay , well, remove nabiulya now, install ulyukaev, something will change, or is it senelnikova murileva, well, or make another rotation, that is, appoint, respectively, between the central bank, the ministry of finance, appoint a minister of finance, what- will it ever change? nothing, but can i tell you why? because , within the framework of informal agreements of the nineties, the financial sector is under the control of the imf, and of course, of course, this launched mechanism brought with it a lot of new and not always good things, for example, you can it would be imaginable that a veteran... of the great patriotic war coul

jeffrey sachs, a professor at columbia university . we are going to new york. hello mr.sachs. thank you i am very happy to be with you. thankful. in recent weeks columbia university's name was regularly in the headlines of the world media. even protests. his current spark started at columbia university. what capacity was there in the atmosphere of columbia university that could inspire protests that have now spread to universities in other countries in addition to american universities . look, columbia university students are very upset. from the painful war that is going on in gaza, they are defending the rights of the palestinians and asking for peace, and i think that this action of theirs is very brave, and in fact , the politicians in america are really surprised. and even the authorities of their university did not expect at all , they expected public opinion to be silent or to support israel, but this did not happen. what feedback did you get from the recent incidents? in addition to the hundreds of students who were arrested and are in danger of being suspended a

translation is so rudely done there unsuccessfully, you know how un -russian these are, that’s where jeffrey sachsr, it came through him, he gave it, and it was translated into russian, and they gave it, that’s what they did, and what did they, for the russians, for the citizens, or something, work for the benefit of the citizens, no, they worked for the benefit of the west, in favor of oneself, and it is also naive to think that new people will come, with one click, everything will change, no, it seems to me that this is a very subtle remark, a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is inevitably the disappearance not even of specific figures, but of a certain type of figure, you know, okay, well, remove the nabiyuli now, put ulyukaeva, something will change, or is it senelnikova murileva, well, or make another rotation, that is, assign accordingly the movement between the central bank, the ministry of finance, set yourself so that a veteran of the great patriotic war could collect a billion rubles in bribes, and while still in the positi

unsuccessful there, there these... you know, how not in russian, everything sits from there - jeffrey sachs it came through him, he gave and translated into russian and gave, that’s what they did, and what they this is not for the russians, for the citizens, or something, they worked for the benefit of the citizens, no, they worked for the benefit of the west, for the benefit of themselves. and it’s also naive to think that new people will come and with one click everything will change, no, it seems to me that the economist mikhail khazin made a very subtle remark, i respect him very much person and i want you to listen to his point of view, i can only say one thing, if we are talking about a change in the elite, and if we are talking about the fact that we need economic growth, then this is inevitable. nothing will change, but can i say why? because, within the framework of informal agreements of the nineties, the financial sector is under the control of the imf, and of course, of course, this launched mechanism brought with it a lot of new and not always good things, for example, one coul

collapse of russia, and ukraine in this case is just a tool, as the famous american economist jeffrey sachse gave an interview to journalist tucker carlson, most of this interview was about the situation in ukraine, hostile to russia, us and nato policies. this also includes, for example, the destruction by the americans of the nord stream pipelines and... according to sachs, the biden administration is almost deliberately prolonging the ukrainian conflict, refusing dialogue with russia, the bet is on the military victory of ukraine, and this was stated by an american economist, which is precisely the mistake of the white house, which, however, does not mean that washington i’m ready to admit it, the plans still remain in force. american senators were in kiev and told the demonstrators, we are with you 100%. victoria was handing out cookies. but in reality there was much, much more than cookies. the us colluded with ukrainian rights to overthrow of yanukovych. this happened by force in february 2014. then this war began. it has begun. not in 2022, but in 2014, when the president of ukraine,

our guest today is professor jeffrey sachs, a professor at columbia university and a world-famous economist and political scientist. jeffrey, it's a pleasure to welcome you, thank you for your time. always a pleasure to talk to you, thank you jeffrey, as you know, tomorrow in russia big holiday, may 9. do you want an economic path that would make america and russia, well, natural friends, in general, she chose a political one and, if you know, no worse than me, that it turned out completely differently, why? well, we probably really need to go back to '45 , now. i would probably say this: if roosevelt had not died, then the cold war would not have happened, because roosevelt really intended to maintain good relations with the soviet union, and he intended to maintain good relations with stalin, and he was a skilled negotiator. i mean roosevelt, and he intended to maintain us-soviet relations at a good level, obviously, and the anti-communists said that roosevelt was too soft and behaved incorrectly, but personally i think that roosevelt was the best president in the history of the united st

demonstrated, the economist included in the list of the most influential people in the world, jeffrey sachsneed our pieces on the board, nato is our piece on the board. why does germany allow foreign troops to remain on its soil for 80 years? i don't understand, why do european countries allow this? would you like to see foreign troops in your city? tucker, when you had a wonderful interview with putin, he answered all the questions except one: you asked him what the germans see in this, and putin said, i don’t understand, i thought, oh god, thank you, because i don’t either i understand, but you know, your question about why the germans need this is the same question as after the united states blew up the nord stream gas pipeline, why don’t the germans tell you why you did it, this is our economy, but they don’t want to, they are so subordinate. usa. and that is why europe is so actively looking for moscow’s hand in everything. the offices of the european parliament were raided by police today. they identified the connections of a parliamentary assistant who now works for the far-right dut

analytical edition of the great game is on air, now we will talk with columbia university professor jeffrey sachs he is an equally famous public figure, who, in my opinion, speaks very convincingly and authoritatively about today’s international relations, frankly speaking, about the significant difficulties that have arisen between russia and the united states, professor sachs, i am glad to welcome you, thank you very much for finding time, i already told you that you are now a real star of the first caliber in russia, your interview with tucker carlson was broadcast on almost all news channels and... the impression is created that it seems to them that they can do absolutely anything without fear consequences, the people of nato member countries understand that we are getting closer and closer to... a very dangerous line, we are getting closer and closer to a catastrophe, to a conflict for which there are no objective reasons or grounds, if you look at what is happening in nato, the usa , canada, great britain, germany, france, all other nato countries, there is not a single government that cur

thus the opening revelation from renowned american economist and allstate, jeffrey sachs. these being interviewed by tucker carlson, they believed up until now that they would get their way to bluff or superiority a force or superiority of finance. they gambled because they were gambling with someone else's lives, someone else's country and someone else has money. are money, the tax payer money, but they were gambling not with their own stakes, but they were gambling. they're not very clever. they gambled wrong all along boot and said, no what is why the city is of western dollars flowing? so k of ukraine has taken it to other states and gets success in fossil. that's according to american business magazine, full, which is published a report questioning vladimir zalinski statements about downing 7 russian wall plays. you can read more about the control vesee on the website, odyssey dot com, the millions of south africans are taking to the poles in a paper. so general election, the ruling africa national congress policy faces is toughest challenge in 30 years . as a coaliti

now clearly already... being scrapped, if not already scrapped, the famous american economist jeffrey sachs and stupidity of washington and biden is that he has not tried to communicate with putin even once since the end of 2021. with all the existing risks of the war escalating into a nuclear one, biden cannot even understand that there is no point at all. why am i only talking about biden? president putin has said many times that he is open to negotiations, but they don’t want it here. for americans, pushing exclusively their own interests, non-acceptance of any other points of view and uh, so to speak, pressure in any direction in order to get their own, this manifests itself differently for everyone, the most master, so to speak, of such behavior was, of course, when he was president, how... first he created conditions for whether sanctions are pushed through by the instrument of diplomacy? no, they certainly are not, this is not diplomacy, i think this is an element, well, as we always say now, this is unfair competition, but i would say more, in modern conditions this is such a new em

united states of america, in my opinion, tucker carlson had a very interesting interview with jeffrey sachsodern agenda, they put a whole series... europe, not to defend europe, not even to protect ourselves, this is hegemony, we need our pieces on the board, but this is our piece on the board. why germany allows foreign troops to remain on its soil for 80 years. i don't understand why european countries allow this, would you like to see foreign troops? tucker, during your wonderful interview with putin, he answered all the questions except one: you asked him what the germans see in this, and putin said, “i don’t understand.” i thought, “oh god, thank you, because i don’t understand either.” this is the same the question is the same after the united states blew up the nord stream gas pipeline. why don’t the germans, before or after this, tell you why you did this, because you undermined our economy, but they don’t want to. that's how subordinate they are to us interests. of a general order, iosifrionovich was the first to talk about joining nato, in 1949, in a conversation with the french a

so jeffrey sachs tried to explain it to the americans.y after what it experienced between 1839 and 1949 under the imperial powers. endlessly invaded china, threatened the unity of china, trying to divide it. china says: don't break our unity. this is why any country that establishes diplomatic relations with china must recognize the one china principle, which means: do not try to divide our country again like you they did this for almost a century, from the mid- nineteenth to the mid-twentieth. taiwan occupies an important place in this story, because they, like mainland china, have in their charter documents: one china and... they do not agree that when the united states established diplomatic relations with the prc, they accepted the one china principle, and that taiwan is part of china, and now they are playing games, i note, very dangerous, we will conclude a trade agreement with taiwan, we will conclude an agreement on nuclear cooperation with taiwan, we will support ensuring their security, but by assuming that taiwan is part of chi

immediately after the big game , famous american economist jeffrey sachs visited dmitry simes. vladimir putin. so, now it's a movie, and after that there's a big game. victory. just before the airfield, please wake me up yes sir. i haven’t seen this for a long time, radio mina, it looks like the fritz saboteurs with their imagination got caught, i don’t think it’s a joke, why would the germans blow up the city. so major general shorokhov, here is diet number three, we usually prepare this by twelve, today we have soup with meatballs, baked fish and cabbage, then by one o’clock we cook the meat, this is... diet number one, how long does it take? did the general and the driver have lunch? about 20 minutes, everything here is operational, so sign here, this is the interrogation protocol, this piece of paper, comrade, this is responsibility for the dacha false testimony up to 5 years. of course, of course, and invite captain dadunov, the head of the canteen, to me, i obey, at 11:50 they were still at headquarters, at 13:05 they were already at the departure post, they spent about 3

jeffrey sachs is one of the most famous modern american economists, a harvard professor, an adviser toboth the usa and russia. he appeared in takir carlson's program after an almost two-year pause. sachs, previously the most popular expert on the main news, was no longer invited to the leading channels after the sabotage on nord streams. shortly after the explosions, i was on bloomberg, where. said: you know, i believe that the usa did this, mr. sachs, how can you say such things, i was taken off the air after 30 seconds, i saw the presenter saying something into the earpiece, it’s not hard to guess what exactly, take him away son of a bitch from the air, they are like this, our interview is over, and after the second presenter scolded me for several minutes, this was the last time the central media invited me, despite the fact that you can’t call saxon a pro-russian speaker, he was one of the developers of shock technology. oh thank you, we are so grateful for your leadership. no, they say: look, you are only a little over four percent of the world's population. there is another 96% w

it's interesting what jeffrey sachs and tucker kahn discussed about putin today, look what you thinkut of the kgb, he understands how the us operates, we have become a state where the cia. exceptional influence, and putin understands this, he doesn’t like it, but he understands it, and his experience, especially because he comes from the kgb, he has no illusions about the united states. i wish we could prove him wrong, but we don't. how influential the cia is in the activities of the us government is definite. very influential, it is an instrument of regime change, and the united states is the only country in the world that relies on regime change as a leading diplomatic role, let me say in another way, not diplomatic, but as a leading instrument of foreign policy, in other words, most countries, almost any small country, any country. for macron, france does not represent any value, he is watching from the banking house where they installed him, scholz also understands perfectly well that... what will happen, well, they are all inside europe, well, except for orban, if we are talking