stand by, jeffrey toobin. i want to go to jessica schneider covering this decision from the supreme court. it's early, but you've been reading through. what do we know? >> reporter: a bit of a mixed outcome here, jim and erica. abortion providers can move forward with their lawsuit to attempt to block this law. on the flipside, though, the supreme court has not blocked the law in the meantime while their challenge goes forward. so today marks the 100th day that this law, sb-8, has been in effect, effectively shutting down abortion clinics in the state. it turns out, according to the supreme court this morning, that effective shutdown will continue. however, the abortion providers will be able to challenge this law, because, remember, that was the issue in this case. because of the unique structure of this law where texas effectively gave that enforcement power to private citizens to bring lawsuits to enforce this law as opposed to state officials enforcing the law, that was a runaround of how people could chal

mr. griffin is he is the producer of a very popular show, but jeffrey toobin, who was in, by the way it is taking everything in my power not to be punny regarding the story . but mister toobin is just, and it was a just but, but his isn't an analyst. and zunker just looks the other way. now, just to give you this much, we live in a world today where a char corporate responsibility, a person in any other corporate setting. if you did 110th the board, jeffrey toobin did, and others, you would be expert gated from the roles immediately just out of out of necessity out of just the way things are today to satisfy people who would take great numbers even that was overlooked. so it's almost 8, a systematic, almost an organic, an institutional sense of looking the other way. so it, but i'm telling you, remember that you're not going to have cnn to kick along a kick around much longer. well, generally the idea of major tv networks sort of being and to decline. you can see that already in their ratings, which have plummeted, but specifically raised at chris cuomo. i mean, we do know that he was

jeffrey toobin who, harris actually described as tube was indefinitely suspended at cnn. so go on vacation and enjoy some time off and we will have you in just a few months. how awkward was that? >> you just tied so much together. i looked at that moment's comic moment last night and i thought two times two. and i guess early in the day i didn't see that. but there he is and he is talking about a coworker who possibly could be accused of witness intimidation and we will get into that. but at the very least jeffrey toobin who couldn't keep his zoom up. i'm being kind and gentle. is there crime here? >> i agree with you that it was gas on top of gas and cnn has a tremendous amount to answer for. i know they could make me be illustrated dedication to ethics and moral behavior, but certainly putting jeffrey toobin, that was not bad. coming up, president biden weighing some of the strictest covid testing at for travelers to the u.s., even for americans who are already vaccinated. stay with us. acute manic, and mixed episodes of bipolar i in adults. full-spectrum relief for all

the last high profile person that they suspended was jeffrey toobin.onths been caught pleasuring himself during a work meeting. that wasn't enough to fire him. this isn't enough to fire cuomo. they are just suspending him. the problem for him, for cuomo, is that he really served one purpose which to help pump up his brother as a viable alternative to donald trump so they covered up all of the nursing home deaths that his brother was responsible for. they painted him as an effective handler of the covid pandemic when he wasn't. and now that that's done, now that trump is no longer in office, they no longer feel that he is useful, the governor is no longer useful, so he is gone. cuomo, the host is no longer useful so he is gone. really cnn has behaved in a journalistically abominable way on this, and most other stories for some time. >> pete: for sure. ari, why is this the straw that at least temporarily mollie makes a great point, the suspension does not mean being fired and jeffrey toobin proves that why is this the straw that broke the camel's back at

but that isn't even the worst of it we are not even counting jeffrey toobin and his pleasuring himselflls. then there is this on friday, cnn senior producer john griffin was arrested and charged for child sex crimes. griffin is accused of coercing parents to allow their minor daughters to engage in sexual activity in his home. he was calling it sexual subserve yens training and the victims are as young as 7 years old. it's disgusting. he is disgusting. and thankfully, he has been fired today and hopefully that's not the end of this story. now, look, his alleged actions obviously do not reflect on his peers at cnn, but i will be honest, i'm getting really tired of being hollerrized to, lectured to about what is good and moral by people who don't seem to have a clue by an organization engulfed in scandal. joining me now to react buck sexton and clay travis the host of the clay travis and buck sexton show. guys, good to see you. i think i have to start with you, clay, because i believe you were banned from cnn for using the word booze. >> yeah. will, i said that i believed in the first am

. >> joining us now to discuss, cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin. both roe and the casey decisions. two of the things that the justices mentioned in each of those were precedent, right, looking to precedent in those cases. and also stressing in the opinions as it was written this real need to follow the rule of law, use constitutional measurement, acknowledging that people may have personal experiences or beliefs, but this needed to be about the law. how do those two, do you think, hold up with the court that we see today? >> well, i think you know, putting the -- your finger on the issue of precedent is very important. because the supreme court cares a great deal about precedent and cares that it be perceived as a body that follows precedent. except when it doesn't. and that's the problem and that's the issue in this case and so many other major cases, which is the supreme court has the ability to change its precedent. sometimes liberals like when precedents are overturned. liberals very much appreciated when the supreme court said that states coul

scarred. >> jesse: jeffrey toobin sitting next to earnsd cooper. >> judge jeanine: he is not scarred., students can just teach themselves. latest nonsense from the student's unions up next. ♪ i'll turn it back around ♪ give me one reason to stay here ♪ and i'll turn it back or not that prevagen seems to help me recall things and also think more clearly. and i enthusiastically recommend prevagen. it has helped me an awful lot. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. ♪ fly me to the moon ♪ let me play among the stars >> judge jeanine: the latest example of education insanity in american schools is coming from oregon. the portland teacher's union asking their district to get rid of one day a week of in person learning and, instead, having students teach themselves. high schoolers would complete their assignments at home and would only be able to ask teachers for help remotely. the union says teachers need more time to prepare lesson plans. okay, greg. >> greg: is this high school or college? >> judge jeanine: high school. >> greg: this is incredible. basically what we are doing here is w

but, look, brian williams made a comeback with msnbc and jeffrey toobin, the self-serving jeffrey toobinis is next level. he is accused of, chris cuomo, right of using his power to help his brother smear and dig up dirt on the sexual assault accusers of his brother, new york attorney general letitia james outlined. that is next level stuff. people are really disgusted by this. chris cuomo's statement about his firing contained no apologies for his own abuses of power using his own position to do this. so who would hire him, joe? >> no apologies for those women, right? what i was about to say, sexual harrassment is the third rail to every tv executive. throw in the factor that andrew cuomo's legal problems are getting worse, the cuomo name you hear it it is becoming too toxic to touch. cuomo brother the only achieved what they did in life because of the cuomo name, because of mario cuomo who conducted himself with dignity, respected by members of both sides of the aisle. in this case three things got the best of the cuomo brothers, ego, hubris and complete lack of a moral compass. spring

. >>> let's get to more on this and bring in our chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin author of the bookthe investigation of donald trump." in court filings the former president's legal team argues this. i'll put it up on the screen. the limited interest the committee may have in immediately obtaining the requested records pales in comparison to president trump's interest in securing judicial review before he suffers irreparable harm. what do you think the court will make of that argument? >> you know, president trump has filed some frivolous lawsuits since he left office. this is not a frivolous lawsuit. this is a case he could definitely win in this supreme court. now, the four judges who have all ruled on this case so far are all democratic appointees and now he's heading to a court with six republican appointees and, you know, even chief justice john roberts who has not been ruling in donald trump's favor in many recent cases, he is someone who believes in strong executive power. and it is unquestioned that the documents at issue here relate to the core functions of the presidency. t

here to discuss, cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin, a former federal prosecutor and an author. gh referred to not only roe v. wade but casey from 1992, which provided more details to the new standard time line for abortion. as precedent on precedent, therefore, had greater weight. as you noted on twitter yesterday, senator susan collins during the confirmation hearing said that brett kavanaugh assured her he considered roe v. wade settled law. based on his questions yesterday, is kavanaugh going back on those commitments? >> he seemed to go almost out of his way to go back on his commitment because he went through a series of questions about the supreme court's ability to overturn its prior prec precedents, which it clearly has. but kavanaugh went on at some length about famous examples of the court overturning its precedents, the most famous being brown v. board of education, another one that separate but equal was constitutional. you know, i don't know if he was trying to troll senator collins and say, hey, i'm confirmed, i can do whatever i want, but the contradiction between

let's bring in cnn's chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin our supreme court analyst.is why evangelicals backed donald trump because he appointed justices to the supreme court who are fighting abortion rights at every step. i mean, it remains a remarkable, remarkable thing, that even though "roe v. wade" is technically still the law of the land, the women of texas are now entering their fourth month where abortion is effectively illegal, and that's what the main -- main message of today's opinion is, and it's just a major change in the law, and it just shows how presidential elections have consequences because abortion rights are being limited or restricted or eliminated in ways that would have been unthinkable just a year or two ago. >> again, i just want to reiterate that they did not rule on the constitutionality of this texas law. they only ruled essentially on whether abortion providers have a right to challenge this law and the suits that have come as a result of it, so what do you think this means, jeffrey, for how the court will ultimately rule on that mississi

wade has been for the last few decades in this country. >> wendy davis, jeffrey toobin, appreciate itight over reproductive rights is flaring again on the hill. so is the battle over gun control. both political obviously lightning rods. colliding at one point yesterday in a passionate speech in the senate. we're back with the lawmaker who delivered it next. ♪ there are beautiful ideas that remain in the dark. but with our new multi-cloud experience, you have the flexibility you need to unveil them to the world. ♪ feeling sluggish or weighed down? it could be a sign that your digestive system isn't working at it's best taking metamucil everyday can help. metamucil psyllium fiber, gels to trap and remove the waste that weighs you down. it also helps lower cholesterol and slows sugar absorption to promote healthy blood sugar levels. so you can feel lighter and more energetic metamucil. support your daily digestive health. and try metamucil fiber thins. a great tasting and easy way to start your day. hey, it's ryan reynolds, owner of mint mobile with a holiday offer i think that you're go

i want to bring in cnn chief legal analyst and former federal prosecutor jeffrey toobin.ordan declined to say on fox whether he would comply with the committee's request. what do you think he'll do? >> well, i think he is obviously going to be torn in two directions. at one level, like -- like congressman perry from pennsylvania, he would like to say to this committee, um, a hand gesture involving one finger that i will not demonstrate. i mean, the -- the contempt that they have for this committee is -- is quite -- is quite intense. on the other hand, you know, jim jordan even more than perry is someone who enjoys the spotlight, enjoys being on television. would like to joust with this committee. and as evan pointed out, you know, he is potentially going to be in the position of sending out subpoenas soon. if he refuses a subpoena, you can bet that witnesses will -- will respond in kind if he becomes chairman of the judiciary committee. personally, i think he is not going to testify. i think he will find a way to tell the committee to go to hell. but i'm -- but -- but it'

wendy davis and cnn chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin.avis, i'm wondering what your impressions were after hearing aurpt arguments today? >> you know, anderson, when -- when the hearing began, i went into it feeling like we probably were going to learn that a majority of the justices were leaning toward upholding that 15-week ban. but otherwise, leaving the protections of roe in place. and i have to say after listening to the arguments today, i am much more concerned that roe is actually going to be completely gutted with a return to state law directing what will happen for women's reproductive freedom going forward. >> and, jeff, i mean, do you agree with senator davis on that? >> boy, i sure do. anderson, i have been to a lot of supreme court arguments, i have listened to a lot of supreme court arguments. i have never heard one where the stakes were clearer and the tension was greater. even though i wasn't -- you know, i could only listen by audio because the courtroom is still closed, largely because of covid. you know, everyone unders

joining us, jeffrey toobin, question number one for you, what do you see in this?urning point in requests. i don't know what kind of answer they will get from scott perry. i suspect it will be a thundering no. but if you look at the texts that have come out in the past couple of weeks, it is completely clear that republican members of the house of representatives were intimately involved in planning the -- the attempt to overturn the election. and that's what the january 6th committee is investigating. so it is perfectly appropriate and natural for them to be asking these questions. you notice that this is a -- not a subpoena. it is just a request because there are definite constitutional issues about whether they could force a fellow member of the house to testify. a request makes sense, but given the attitude of the house republicans towards this committee, i'm sure that i suspect that they will get, you know, this is a witch-hunt, i'm not cooperating. >> jeffrey, "the new york times" has a story this morning about the possibility of criminal referrals from the c

jeffrey toobin, as you know, then-president trump appointed very conservative justices to the court,ve justices to the court. do you think that anyone on the bench is going to be sympathetic to his argument, because the former president has made no secret about his expectations when it comes to loyalty. i mean we saw that which he was challenging the election results. he was practically saying, i put you on the supreme court, make me president. >> well, you know, it is worth remembering that the four judges who have decided this case so far, one district court judge and three court of appeals judges, have all been democratic appointees. so now it is going up to a court with six conservatives including three trump appointees. i don't think it is necessarily a question of loyalty. i don't think these justices are thinking, well, i have to repay the president for appointing me. however, i do think that the conservative justices, especially the three he appointed, have a very robust conception of executive power, and they believe that if a president can't speak frankly with his advisors

jeffrey toobin got a second chance. one hundred percent i don't want to bury -- you just said that i found fascinating do you not think chris cuomo will work in business again. >> jeffrey toobin back people come back the reason they don't come back the only reason we found yet egregious sexual harassment allegations, ayala matt lauer. i was fascinating said additional information led to this decision what is that additional information why do you think chris cuomo in the back in the newsroom. >> brian williams i said no way this guy can come back saying shot at in iric saw body floating down french quarter trying to get he promotion a full hour never had before additional information i wonder what that is don't want to speculate that seemed tipping point i guess in addition to text messages keeping up cuomos the thing most famous duo since, and now brother had to resign the other brother got fired. >> going to run for president? >> absolutely. >> in that moment replace jeff bezos top of the ticket. pete: now from chris

n. legal analyst jeffrey toobin was electrically called performing a sex act touring a work related video call, or contributor lauren chen suspects that the scandals will dent see an end ratings . the charges that john griffin is facing, they are not capricious. they are not merely based on a he said, she said, situation. there are evidence of payments at text messages that duly people to believe authority, specifically that he has been at paying underage girls of for sexual favors, as well as trying to involve their mothers to varying degrees. he is engaged in grooming, and some would argue, as well as sex trafficking, many mainstream media outlets not just seen on themselves have, i think, been a little bit hesitant to talk about this issue. even though we can only imagine what the reaction would have been if this had been someone, for example, on the fox news team or the trump team that had been discovered doing the exact same things overall as cnn's credibility has been shipped away, specially over the trump administrations years, a lot of people just no longer believe that they are a

like when it welcomes back chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin after his embarrassing scandal in which he pleasured himself during a live video conference. then there's chris cuomo, the well known c. n. n. anchor dismissed for advising his disgrace, new york, my brother, who faced multiple allegations of sexual harassment, but all is forgiven and he'll be back on screens as early as next month. say reports as the channels that ratings freefall losing a massive 76 percent of his audience since january this year. perhaps his case is like this that are actually resonating with viewers. political analysts. jennifer, britons not convinced even the talk to tow leadership change would revive the network's credibility. i think of the american people, both sides of the aisle kind of lost any sort of any sort of trust or, or faith in cnn is an honest objective reporting news network with so much bias and propaganda. and you can say that about many news networks, but in terms of wanting to report that, so if there's a chance of a leader coming in or new leadership by changing the board of directo

like when it's well comes back, chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin off there his embarrassing scandal in which he pleasure himself during a live video conference. then, as chris cuomo, the well known cnn anchor dismissed for advising his disgraced new york. my brother who faced multiple allegations of sexual harassment but all is forgiven and he'll be back on screens as early as next month. say reports as the channels ratings free for losing a massive 76 percent of his audience since january this year. perhaps his case is like this, that actually resonating with few us or just a moment here on the program. let's bring you some news. reaching out to this hour from south america is where we've just received reports that to blasts of a code, an airport in the northeast of columbia on the countries border with venezuela. and local media reporting, say to police officers were killed. they also claim terrorists were behind the attack. and some reports also say one of the attackers was also killed in the explosion. as we understand now, old flights to and from the airport, have been suspende

you remember jeffrey toobin was tossed off the air at cnn after he disgraced himself during his own,rought him back. it was an awkward reentry. >> i feel like we should addres what happened in the month. you were on a zoom zoom call with your colleagues from the end everyone took a break durin several minutes during which time you thought on camera, you are subsequently fired from tha job after 25 years of working there and, you since then have an on leave, to quote jay leno, what were you thinking? >> obviously i wasn't thinking very well or very much and it was something that was inexplicable to me. i didn't think i was on the call . i didn't think other people could see me. >> he seems to have things well in hand, laura. say what you want, if people ar looking for partisan legal analysis, he is not one for pulling at the most obvious thing. he digs around to find somethin original and then he exposes it to the audience no matter the consequence. obvious what is cnn thinking with this guy? where is accountability, where our standards and we will get into it, rick santorum who was b

like when it welcomes back chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin off there his and bower sing, scandal, in which he pleasure himself during a live video conference. then that's chris cuomo, the well known c. n. n. anchor dismissed for advising his disgraced new york. my brother who faced multiple allegations of sexual harassment but only forgiven and he'll be back on screens as early as next month, say reports at the channels ratings free for losing a massive 76 percent of his audience since january this year. perhaps his case is like this, but that actually resonating with few us. yeah, the story right now continues online at all t dot com, click on the usa section and scroll down. have a look at the comment section as well. the comments, certainly shutting some interesting angles on that story. well, this is auto international, half part of the our hero. moscow we are back soon with. ah ah ah ah, all central banks, all banks, all unfair bible committees on viable centers of our arc run. some of them are very corrupt, some of them are extremely current here in el salvador. their money

joining me is jeffrey toobin and laura jarrett. jeffrey, explain what's happening here.reed to appear before them. he is not waiving executive privilege. how is this going to happen? . >> we don't know. there was a confluence of interest here. mark meadows, unlike steve bannon, does not relish the idea of being indicted. he wants to avoid that fate. the kphet doesn't want to get bogged down into a legal fight that will get them nothing. so meadows is going to provide something. he will provide emails. whether he will provide useful testimony and meaningful emails, frankly, i don't know. and i don't know if anyone knows at this point. because that is a very ambiguous statement. . >> the question is, why did he change his tune? if the whole goal was to slow walk things, and even if you know you were going to get overturned by the courts eventually, the goal was to delay, delay. that was the end goal. why now? is it because the court of appeals appears to be willing to rule against the president on executive privilege? we don't know all the ins and outs. >> we don't know. b

. >>> joining us now, chief legal analyst and former federal prosecutor jeffrey toobin and alice stewart. jeff, looking at where we stand this morning. a lot of questions about, is the doj going to act? how long could that take? we'll have to wait that out is the bottom line. but when you look at the cases being laid out here, you know, methodically by liz cheney specifically yesterday and monday, what more do you anticipate is coming? because this it would seem is really sort of the tip of the iceberg. >> if i can just make one comment first about what president biden said. >> yeah. >> he shouldn't say that. you know, the democrats criticized president trump for years for interfering with justice department decisions. there is no reason for president biden to say that this looks like contempt to him. he should leave those decisions to the department of justice. however, it does look like this investigation has a long way to go and there are potentially lots more prosecutions and the evidence that came out this week only adds to that. two federal judges this week said that the obstructio

remember legal analyst jeffrey toobin was tossed off the air at cnn after he disgraced himself duringcall, this week cnn brought him back and it was an awkward reentry. >> i feel like we should address what happened in the month since we have seen you. you were on a zoom call with your colleagues from new yorker magazine. everyone took a break for several minutes during which time you were caught masturbating on camera. he was subsequently fired from that job after 27 years of working there and since then have been on leave from cnn. to quote jay lehto, what the hell were you thinking? >> obviously i wasn't thinking very well or very much and it was something that was inextricable to me. i didn't think i was on the call. i didn't think anybody could see me. >> he seems to have things well in hand. if people are looking for partisan legal analysis, tube and is not one for pulling of the most obvious thing, he digs around to find something original and is willing to explain it to the audience no matter the consequences. what is cnn thinking? where is accountability, where our standards

i want to bring in jeffrey toobin. good to see you, jeffrey. >> hi, don. >> you said this would happen. do you think the votes are there to overturn roe v. wade? >> i wasn't sure before the oral argument and sometimes you can read too much into what justices say, but there were five justices today who looked very ready to overturn roe versus wade. the five first conservatives, thomas, aleet aeo -- alito, gorsuch, kavanaugh and barrett. justice roberts tried to suggest that maybe there was an interim position you uphold the mississippi law but you don't specifically overturn roe versus wade and none of the other five conservatives seemed remotely interested and brett kavanaugh and other conservatives say we overturn precedents sometimes. there is nothing unusual or wrong with that and roe v wade looks next. >> listen to what some of the conservative justices said. >> but if it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time? >> the fetus has an interest in having a life and that doesn't change, does it,

, i think the end result of all this is he's coming back to my people are comparing it to the jeffrey toobinnk it is actually different strokes for different folks. [laughter] >> he has been waiting to say that all day. >> all day long. >> greg: i don't get it. he's seriously -- got at. some might say i'm a little slow. it's going to be interesting, if he doesn't come back, that means both brothers are out of work. they should open up an italian restaurant where they serve fettuccine alfredo. i made that up to since my friend texted it to me. >> that's almost as good as my joke. >> greg: i don't know what to ask you. answer the question that you would like me to ask. >> it's been a lot of -- >> greg: what about his excuse, family? >> he lied to the attorney general, didn't he? he said to the attorney general i wasn't doing awful research, then what is i've got a lead on the wedding girl? what is that if not apple opposn research? i forgot about forcible touching and that shouldn't be something that i forgot about because that is a bad thing to do. >> greg: it's a bad thing to forget about. >

she's also -- meeting with jeffrey toobin. allowed in because like joe biden on air force one, she missed one of them. the guest of honor best of his own grandmother and oprah pasta best best friend, she did finally make it the next day after completing oprah's strict regimen but it's still unclear which step, the vaccination, the tested, the boosted, or the quarantined, that she missed. meanwhile, president biden continues to weigh vaccine minutes for air travel. reporters pressed him on the issue on vacation in delaware. >> when will you make a decision [indiscernible]? >> thanks, guys. >> kat: we wanted a clearer answer, so we zoomed with the president earlier. what do you say, joe? >> no, no. look, i'm going to do with the medical guys tell me to do, all right? i don't take a pepto-bismol without their permission. so the thing with the planes, i don't want to do it, to be honest. if everyone is vaccinated on the plane and someone gets sick, i get no one to blame. look, i've promised you that if you did what you were told,

. >> i will go with jeffrey toobin.r his page, running for the most shocking come back which was surprising. let's go to the next one. the biggest power trip of the year. >> that goes to anthony fauci. that some that. when he said i am science. i represent science so if you criticize anthony fauci who is infallible, then you are criticizing science itself. in that moment i saw that he thinks he has taken on godlike powers. that is the person with the biggest power trip of the year. sean: with you have? >> kamala harris but she was assigned the responsibility of immigration and making sure we get it under control. when asked why she hadn't gone to the border to see what it is she is supposed to be responsible for her response was i haven't gone to europe either. sean: and then she complained -- >> major power trip. sean: i'm going to go with gavin newsom just because he was a covid mandate -- let's move on. the best but worse tools for thee but not for me moment of the year. >> everyone remembers how nancy pelosi decided

we saw what happened with jeffrey toobin. are you surprised.ards by which the folks at cnn have to abide. but i think this is the right call. right after chris cuomo was suspended before this firing. the ratings on his show actually spiked after his suspension. maybe they have been looking for a way to get him out of there and this was the extra push that they needed. but it seems like that this is going to be rather well received by folks on the right, and not well received by folks on the left. i think it will be split down the middle. aishah: i wonder if chris cuomo is surprised by there is. he said it hurts to even say it. it's embarrassing, by understand it and i understand why some people feel the way they do about what i did. i apologized in the past and i mean it. the last thing i ever wanted to do was compromise any of my colleagues. i don't know if it's too little too late. some would say you always choose family. what is your response to that. leo: best decision ever made by cnn. he had a conflict of interest. he's a lawyer. he's a j

. >>> let's bring in cnn's chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin and laura cotes. she has a new book coming out in january titled "just pursuit, a black prosecutor's fight for fairness." good evening to both of you. jeffrey, before we get into the nitty gritty of, this it seems very clear that we almost had a coup last time. as you look at what happened since january 6, do you have any doubt that the same people would try again next time? and the question is, might they succeed? >> well, the odds are better this time, because they will have learned from the last -- from the last, uh, experience, about what they can do. but let's just talk about, you know, what we have -- what we are learning about what's gone on at the white house, you know, between november and january. i mean, the -- the -- the degree to which the entire white house was fixated on trying to overturn this election, and, you know, what i don't think enough people have focused on is that in the past week, the district court in washington, two different judges, have said, you know, when you go into th

i'm going to go with jeffrey toobin. you all were member his zoom?so running for the most shocking come back, which was surprising, so he had quite a fall. let's go to the next one. who had the biggest power trip of the year? >> that definitely goes to anthony fauci. i think the quote that really sums that up is when he said "i am science -- or i represent science," so if you criticize anthony fauci, who is a fallible, finite human beings just like the rest of us, then you are criticizing science itself. in that moment i saw that he thinks he has taken on godlike powers, so that is the person with the biggest power trip of this year. >> sean: horace, who did you have? >> kamala harris. she was assigned the responsibility of immigration and making sure that we get it under control. when asked why she hadn't gone to the border to actually see what it is that she is supposed to be responsible for, her response was well, i haven't gone to europe either. >> sean: that's true. and then she complains that she had left -- >> major power trip. >> sean: major