>> at issue is the line of questioning at a 2013 state department briefing where then jen psaki appearedsled the media for the good of national security. but when james rosen tried to pull video from a public archive, those minutes were edited out. psaki said it wasn't her. "i had no knowledge of nor would i have approved of any form of editing or cutting my briefing transcript." but in a responding e-mail to psaki, james rosen wrote, "the briefing transcript remained unaltered the entire time. do you want to issue a revised statement asserting the same for the video which was not altered." hopefully you will find the time to spend on the range of global events happening in the world in between attacking my character. rosen said he never asaled her character and john kirby complimented rosen. >> i want to thank james rosen, your correspondent, for bringing this to my attention because if he hadn't, i would have never known that this occurred. >> kirby also says the editor who cut the video doesn't know who gave the order but kirby maintains there is no coverup. megyn? >> trace, thank you

these are not right biwing zeals as far as i can tell. >> no. >> and jen psaki is misplaced in saying it's just me wanting air time or fox news. >> i'd like to know who is trying to cover stuff up. i think that's important. so we'll stay on it, rosen, and if anybody is mean to you, you let me know and i'll take care of them. >> thank you, bill. >>> mitch mcconnell tells a radio guy i'm clueless when it comes to case law. after that a "factor" investigation. texting in the car, is it killing thousands? americans? right bac ladies, why just dream of worry-free nights? i'm linda, and like millions of women worldwide i trust tena. and with new tena overnight underwear i can now sleep worry free all night. the unique secure barrier system gives me triple protection from leaks, odor and moisture so i can keep being a sweet dreamer. tena overnight underwear and pads. only tena lets you be you. burning of diabetic nerve pain, these feet were the first in my family to graduate from college and trained as a nurse. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. so i talked to my doctor a

so jen psaki. if i had, the thing is, that's why you have to find out who the political appointee was that made the call to the civilians to ask them to do it. >> somebody higher up did this. i mean it's not some flunkie. >> i think a video caused this. clearly -- >> it was the video. >> they were watching some video on youtube and they got really upset and decided to edit it. >> can you imagine if you guys edited -- >> something that cheney had ordered there would be a hearing. >> what's worse, the actual editing of the eight minutes of rosen's question and the answer or the cover-up? >> cover-up usually sends men to jail. ask martha stewart. >> the state department has lied about this for weeks. only because we caught them when ben rhodes said we've been lying to you about the iran deal. >> it's all -- that's the best part about it. it's rhodes' ego. >> how many more of these are there? do you remember when francois hollande's comment on terrorism was edited because they didn't want it on the rec

james went back in december of that year and asked jen psaki whether or not in fact victoria newland was lying about that. she eventually after multiple questions got to that sometimes diplomacy needs privacy in order to progress, this is a good example of that. well, in the wake of the ben rhodes piece that said that essentially, the administration conned the press to get the iran deal through, there were people who went back to that moment where jen psaki talked about that answer. well, it had been erased. there was a white flash and eight minutes of james rosen's exchange with jen psaki was deleted from the state department youtube account and the web briefing on the internet. and at the time when pressed about that, the state department said it was a glitch, a glitch had happened. well, today john kirby, you just heard him say it wasn't a glitch, it was a deliberate request to erase a transcript and video, video specifically. the transcript was there. and that's a big deal for an administration to one, admit that and two, to do it. and while it takes some explaining to do, that's

state delivering specific orders to delete our correspondent's james rosen's question and then jen psaki's answer but since they don't remember who called with the instructions don't anyone to get in trouble. >> i asked the office of legal adviser to look into this. they did. they -- they pursued it for me, and we -- we got about as far as we can go. the individual who took the call doesn't remember anything more than it was being passed on from somebody else in the public affairs bureau. i can't be any more specific than that right now. >> reporter: this all started in early 2013. spokeswoman victoria newland denied talks with tehran. when rosen went back at the end. year and asked if that was true spokeswoman jen sapsaki so unsatisfactory that it was scrubbed until a few weeks ago and this is the part of the response they tried to bury. >> is it the policy of the state department where the preservation of the secrecy of secret negotiations is concerned to lie in order to achieve that goal? >> james, i think there are times when where diplomacy needs privacy in order to progress. this is

jen psaki is saying, yes. someone said, my goodness, she blew it and edit it out of the final record. when the story gets exposed. no one has a full interview of the one-on-one talks about the american and iranian officials. he didn't go back to his producer to say, i remember this question. what else did they edit? >> that's why when the editor said he doesn't remember who gave him the up instruction, either he's lying or is asked to do it so many times he can't remember who asked him to do th this. >> would you ever someone asking you something of command? >> this was not a request, this was a digital request to edit the video. as i said, and i said it this morning to the staff, i don't find that to be an appropriate step to take. so i'm going to make sure we have the right moves in place. >> if this was edited on a state department computer and using state department software, it is notable who did it. it is logged and a permanent record. >> who called the editor to say do it. jen psaki is now at the white

jen psaki, in the subsequent interview months later after it came out they were negotiating with the iranians, all she had to say was yes, we did lie to you because it was a strategic requirement. we had to get this done. but instead, she weaseled and waffled and we know ben rhodes has been pushing lies all along, and so cynical. and the swamp of corruption it seems isn't the initial deed. it's the cover-up and the lies on top of lies on top of lies to try to cover people's tracks. deirdre: indeed, and the idea of framing, you mentioned of course deputy ben rhodes and the fact that it is very much out there that he was framing, and i think he called it an echo chamber where he was essentially leading the press to what he said they wanted to hear. >> yeah government lies come in a lot of different flavors, and lies should be used very, very sparingly, only in case of absolute strategic necessity. but ben rhodes and it seems the state department representatives weren't lying from strategic necessity after that initially. they were lying for political advantage, and that is wrong. deird

watching jen psaki at the podium even answering the question from james rosen whatever happened to no comment. instead of fumbling for some sort of formula where she could give a non-denial denial she could just say no comment, no comment, no comment. she couldn't bring herself to do that. very strange. >> what about the investigation is over. we're going to move forward. it's not going to happen again. one, we don't know who made the call to edit it. >> no, we don't. >> two, the person apparently forgot like they just forgot who it was, who made the call. >> or admirable kirby. smart enough to know the difference between right and wrong, long pretty impressive career in the pentagon. in the position of defending the indefensible. a lot of takes place. probably has to. this isn't attack on history and reality itself. it's dispersioning what happened. physical record itself. if you set out to expunge any inartful response jen psaki has given it would give an entire apartment. this tells you about their mind set. this doesn't fit into the categories that the public should see therefore

and the fact that jen psaki had essentially acknowledged that her predecessor, at that podium, victoriaand, 10 months earlier had lied to me me and the rest of my colleagues about the iran nuclear talks. >> what exactly was the lie? >> okay. so there is victoria nuland. i asked her february 2013. we hear reports of direct secret bilateral talks between members of the obama administration and the iranian government? true or false? and she said of the kind of government to government level contact you are talking about, no. at that time, those direct secret talks were going on for more than a year. once they were. >> why is that important? look, there is no question they did not tell the truth. okay. why is it important? why would they go to the extent of trying to get that off youtube and get that out of their files? so, you lied, rosen caught you in a lie. so what? i mean, that's -- then you just go ahead, right? >> nobody here asserts that the person who issued this order for this censorship was thinking or acting rationally, bill. >> okay. so there is no real reason to do it, other th

leland: makes it very hard to talk about the global issues, mercedes, that jen psaki wants everyone toalk about when they can't even tell the truth about their position on the global issues. >> last time i checked this iranian issue is a global issue and the mere fact that they lied to the american people, that this administration has decided to say, we weren't having these secret negotiations or secret diplomacy with iran, is unfair. it is inappropriate. the american people have the right to know. especially when you're talking about an incredibly unpopular deal that the united states has made with this iranian regime. leland: well, we'll have to see if the state department can't figure out who called ho when. one would think american diplomats have records sitting around. we'll see. juan, mercedes, have a great weekend. thanks, guys. >> thank you. martha: we have breaking news on a dangerous person who made it across other southern border. a chilling new report that individuals from terrorist hotbeds are being smuggled in an operation across the southern border. one got through despi

an answer from former spokeswoman jen psaki about the administration misleading the press about whentiations began. james rosen posed the question about whether there could be secret talks going on with iran and whether the administration purposely misled reporters and a clip of that exchange disappeared. >> it was three years ago and the individual who took the call doesn't have a memory of it. there were no rules or regulations in place that prohibited this. we learned quite a bit. we learned there was a deliberate request. this wasn't a technical glitch. martha: garrett, the state department is admitting this was deliberately edited out of the clip on youtube and the state department site. >> the missing video was not the result of a glitch. what we don't know is who that state department official is. that 8-minute clip was from a state department briefing from reporters in december of 2013 when in response to a question by james rosen jen psaki admitted the administration purposely misled the press. >> did the policy where the preservation of the secrecy of secret negotiations ar

there are times where diplomacy needs privacy in order to progress. >> the implication there from jen psaki, sometimes governments need to deceive in order to achieve goals. flash forward to when psaki acknowledged that the state department lied to the public. that exchange had been edited out of the official video and here is how state department spokesperson explained the missing video on may 10th of this year. >> there was a glitch in the state department video. >> a glitch? >> a defect. a technical malfunction. now flash forward three weeks and here is state department spokesman john kirby just yesterday. >> you learn that there was a deliberate request, that this wasn't a technical glitch, this was a request to excise video. >> wow. so, in fact, someone asked the editor go into this video already posted on the state department website and remove several minutes of it from the archive. to recap, there was first a lie told us to about the secret talks between iran and the obama administration. we'll call that lie number one. general psaki acknowledged lie number one in 2013 and then some

jen psaki said she will cooperate with any congressional investigation. >> of course. i have absolutely nothing to hide here, wolf. but i will say again, i had no involvement and no knowledge. >> suspicions have swirled that it may have been part of the administration's broad plan to sell the iran deal at all costs, suspicions fed by deputy national security adviser ben rhodes admission to "the new york times" that we created an echo chamber. with think tank experts who had valued them with what we had given them to say. >> in my view, the creation of the echo chamber and the war room does constitute a deception of the american people and that i representatives. >> if the edit was part of a plan to deceive, it was sloppily carried out. the written transcript of the briefing, as well as the defense department version of the same briefing remained intact and unedited. >>> up next. the latest in the search for the missing fort hood soldiers caught in the texas floods. first what some fox affiliates are covering tonight. fox 8 in cleveland, father of a daughter murdered lu

both jen psaki and her then-subordinate, marie harf denied any involvement. harf issued a statement, as jen tweeted yesterday, i also had no knowledge of nor would i have approved of this editing, i have no idea who asked for the editing of the tape. but today rosen asked another question of psaki, via email. he noted that her statement from yesterday denied quote any form of editing or cutting my briefing transcript. meaning the written transcript. rosen asked in today's email, the briefing transcript remained unaltered the entire time. do you want to issue a revised statement asserting the same for the video? which was altered? psaki replied on the record to rosen this afternoon quote my statement applies to the video. which is considered a form of the transcript and every aspect of this. she then tore into rosen for even asking the question quote you have spent the last three weeks vilifying me on television without any evidence of my knowledge or involvement. and without once reaching out and asking me. hopefully you will find the time to spend on the ran

its state department today admitted it cut 8 minutes from a videotape from a 2013 jen psaki news briefing about secret u.s.-iranian nuclear talk before posting that video to its website. the state department previously suggested a glitch occurred in which a dialogue between our james rosen and jen psaki was eliminated. the spokesman now john kirby confessed it was intentionally removed on orders. >> there was a deliberate request that this wasn't a technical glitch, this was a deliberate request. we do not know who made the request to edit the video or why it was made. lou: well, one, i'll bet you it wasn't a request. two, i'll bet you it was an order. three, i bet you they know who did it. the controversy dates back to early 2013 when our james rosen pushed victoria newlyin on her denial that the united states was involved in talks with iran. her denial. ten months later, it was revealed such discussions had taken place. >>> and new developments in the clinton e-mail scandal. the former state department computer staffer who helped hillary clinton set up her private e-mail server says now

both jen psaki and her then-subordinate, marie harf denied any involvement.sued a statement, as jen tweeted yesterday, i also had no knowledge of nor would i have approved of this editing, i have no idea who asked for the editing of the tape. but today rosen asked another question of psaki, via email. he noted that her statement from yesterday denied quote any form of editing or cutting my briefing transcript. meaning the written transcript. rosen asked in today's email, the briefing transcript remained unaltered the entire time. do you want to issue a revised statement asserting the same for the video? which was altered? psaki replied on the record to rosen this afternoon quote my statement applies to the video. which is considered a form of the transcript and every aspect of this. she then tore into rosen for even asking the question quote you have spent the last three weeks vilifying me on television without any evidence of my knowledge or involvement. and without once reaching out and asking me. hopefully you will find the time to spend on the range of gl

gosh, these people might be suspicious of whether jen psaki was involved with this. the probe. admiral kirby looks like a stand-up guy at the moment. it's been referred to the investigative office. he says there are no rules that govern this kind of administrative decision. why if this is done, why is it in the hands of legal adviser? gee, it looks like they would determine if someone broke the law. >> i'm not an attorney, juan, although i do take relish in playing one on television. probably there are laws on the books to make it a crime to doctor official government evidence of some kind but i think reading between the lines, what admiral kirby is saying we're at a point where we cannot definitely say who issued this order. it's three years in the past, so we're going to just let it be, albeit with the proviso that he's going to put in place procedures so it doesn't happen again. there will be further investigation of this at least by other news organizations. >> let's go to dana who has some experience in what goes on behind the scenes there. >> i think you are be

jen psaki said she will cooperate with any congressional investigation. >> of course. i have absolutely nothing to hide here, wolf. but i will say again, i had no involvement and no knowledge. >> suspicions have swirled that it may have been part of the administration's broad plan to sell the iran deal at all costs, suspicions fed by deputy national security adviser ben rhodes admission to "the new york times" that we created an echo chamber. with think tank experts who had valued them with what we had given them to say. >> in my view, the creation of the echo chamber and the war room does constitute a deception of the american people and that i representatives. >> if the edit was part of a plan to deceive, it was sloppily carried out. the written transcript of the briefing, as well as the defense department version of the same briefing remained intact and unedited. >>> up next. the latest in the search for the missing fort hood soldiers caught in the texas floods. first what some fox affiliates are covering tonight. fox 8 in cleveland, father of a daughter murdered lu

the former state department spokesperson involved in that exchange, jen psaki, denying knowing anything about it. we'll give you her full statement after this. >> we learned there was a deliberate request, that this wasn't a technical glitch. this was a deliberate request to excise video. and as i said, and said it this morning to the staff, i don't find that an appropriate step to take. ♪ ♪ (singing) you wouldn't haul a load without checking your clearance. so why would you invest without checking brokercheck? check your broker with brokercheck. it's more than a nit's reliable uptime. and multi-layered security. it's how you stay connected to each other and to your customers. with centurylink you get advanced technology solutions, including an industry leading broadband network, and cloud and hosting services - all with dedicated, responsive support. with centurylink as your trusted technology partner, you're free to focus on growing your business. centurylink. your link to what's next. poallergies?reather. stuffy nose? can't sleep? take that. a breathe right nasal strip instantly open

already a statement, jen psaki white house communications director said, quote, i have no knowledge of of any form of editing or cutting my briefing transcript on any subject while at the state department. i believe deeply in providing the press as much information on important issues as possible. someone ordered this, arthur. someone ordered those eight minutes to be removed from the website and youtube channel. what is going on here? >> well, let's just start at the beginning. i mean that's wrong, right? it is 100% wrong. it is inexcusable. if it needed to be removed for any justifiable reason, let's say, she said something that was a, put our troops at risk and it had to be removed. then you have to put something in there. eight minutes of the video have been removed, upon authority of so-and-so. >> yeah. >> to say it was computer glitch you're just lying to americans and it does make me think of what eric holder said this past weekend i believe it was, which you know, you may disagree with everything he has ever done and you may agree, disagree with the wording he said about eric s

jen a sack ajen * psaki is in ce editing. judge napolitano: what do you do when your client says something embarrassing on air. >> i'm shaking my head when they try to equate diplomacy wisconsin an excuse for not telling the truth. this nuclear iran deal stinks from the beginning. we are giving billions of dollars bang to a nation that supports terrorism. we are justifying continuing to support a sinking ship in foreign policy as opposed to building a new one. i think today is an example of a system that's out of control of government that's not telling the truth and going right to the impatience of the american people look for better. >> here is the back story for those of us watching now. ben rhodes who is the president's second in command with respect to the negotiations with iran told a "new york times" recordr reporter, "new york times" magazine that he did lie to the congress and to the american people in order to temper irrational fears members of congress have about the people returning the iranian government. now it

eight-minute video portion which included fox news correspondent james rosen asking then spokeswoman jen psaki about negotiations in the iran nuclear deal. the state department initially said the edit was ordered over the phone, but they couldn't figure out who was responsible. >>> the dow grew 67 to finish above 18,000, the s&p 500 rose 7 and the nasdaq jumped 13. >>> coming up, lawmakers are locked up over giving felons the right to vote. how the battle headed to court could have an impact on the presidential election. >>> one state's battle over voting rights is headed to court it could have an impact on the presidential election. earlier this year, virginia's democratic governor signed an executive order restoring voting rights to 200,000 convicted felons. but republicans have filed suit saying the governor overstepped his constitutional authority. tonight a look at the law and lawsuit. with the clock ticking down to the general election, the fight over voting rights for convicted felons who have served their time is heating up in virginia. which could serve as a pivotal swing state this f

we were concerned by some of the coverage that jen psaki was being sullied by, allegations she somehow, this came from her. we recognized we needed to clearly refute that, so we did. >> citizens have got to feel that their vote matters, that their voice matters, and whether they can't spare a single cent to help someone running for office or they can write a big check, that their concerns will be listened to and followed up on. >> sunday night on "q&a," tammy baldwin talks about her career in public service and wisconsin political history. >> bob the follett senior helped helpedla follette senior bring about the change where senators were not appointed by the legislators, but demanded elections. if that i don't know was the first, but the idea it would not be the party bosses who made the decision of who the nominees were in smoke-filled back rooms, but rather the people who were going to get a chance to vote in free and fair elections. >> sunday night at 8:00 on "q&a." republican presidential candidate donald trump at a campaign rally in california. then a discussion on efforts to com

someone at the state department scrubbed video of an exchange between then spokesperson jen psaki and fox news reporter james rosen. during that 2013 briefing psaki admitted iran nuclear negotiations began back in 2011. the video of that briefing now has that exchange removed. so today a state department spokesperson is trying to find out who order deferred the editing. and the stanford rape story is dominating the headlines. one of the student who one of the student who heroically helped stop you totaled your brand new car. nobody's hurt, but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement, we'll replace the full value of your car. see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. ♪ no, you're not ♪ yogonna watch it! ♪tch it! ♪ ♪ we can't le

eight-minute video portion which included fox news correspondent james rosen asking then spokeswoman jen psakiin the iran nuclear deal. the state department initially said the edit was ordered over the phone, but they couldn't figure out who was responsible. >>> the dow grew 67 to finish above 18,000, the s&p 500 rose 7 and the nasdaq jumped 13. >>> coming up, lawmakers are locked up over giving felons the right to vote. how the battle headed to court could have an impact on the presidential election. real is touching a ray. amazing is moving like one. real is making new friends. amazing is getting this close. real is an animal rescue. amazing is over twenty-seven thousand of them. there is only one place where real and amazing live. seaworld. real. amazing our customer is a our 21-year-old female. heavily into basketball. wait. data just changed... now she's into disc sports. ah, no she's not. since when? since now. she's into tai chi. she found disc sports too stressful. hold on. let me ask you this... what's she gonna like six months from now? who do we have on aerial karate? steve. steve.

the state department singing a didn't tune, an exchange between fox news james rosen and jen psaki. will they investigate who did that? plus, check this out, you better find another route around this area. there is a massive sinkhole in the middle of a main city. >> when i got here and saw the hole in the street, it was rather amazing. now you can. when you lease the 2016 es 350 for $329 a month for 36 months. see your lexus dealer. and we'll have to use like double! maybe more!! i'm going back to the store? yes you are. dish issues? get cascade platinum. one pac cleans tough food better than 6 pacs of the bargain brand combined. cascade. if yo...well do i haveen it all, a surprise for you. it's red lobster's new lobster and shrimp summerfest! with the lobster and shrimp... ...you love in so many new dishes, you're gonna wanna try... ...every last one. like the new coastal lobster & shrimp. with a wood-grilled lobster tail, ...wild-caught red shrimp crusted with panko, ...and shrimp fresh off the grill and brushed with... ...summer ale bbq sauce. or try the new lobster & shrimp over

that deleted part included an admission by then spokeswoman jen psaki that the government had lied aboutparis yesterday, secretary of state john kerry called that decision to edit that video out stupid, columnsy, and inappropriate. he said he didn't think that kind of person should be working for him. congress is now getting involved as well. several lawmakers are calling on the state department inspector general to investigate the incident. the inspector general's office have said they have not determined whether or not they will do that at this time. sandra? >> all right, garrett teny, thank you. all right, tucker over to you. >> thanks, san draft it's an ugly scene in northern california this week. hundreds of protesters caught on camera swarming donald trump supporters. rioters, throwing bottles, waving a mexican flag. one woman was cornered and egged. why does san jose welcome illegal immigrants famously but not trump supporters and more to the point why aren't police doing more? here to weigh in fox news contributor bo dietl and fox news legal analyst are arthur aidala one the most

jen psaki, who was involved in one of these briefings and is now a senior advisor at the white house it, attacked james rosen and went on cnn -- >> falsely, by the way. >> right. then went on cnn and said this. >> i will let the state department and their lawyers speak to that. i will say i think i understand why people at home who are watching this inside the beltway debate in many ways. >> understand why people at home debate this in many ways, not this is despicable and we are going to find the people who did it and punish them. >> it seems like they might know who it is. also, the phrase she used there was inside the beltway. the implication clearly was oh, this is just a d.c. thing that those stoort of silly political people care about. average people don't. if i'm an average person out there in america, if the u.s. government lied about something like i don't know, a nuclear deal with a hostile enemy in iran, then covered up the lie by editing the official record, doctoring video to pretend several minutes of tough questioning never existed, that goes to the core of who we are

. >>> well, jen psaki lashing out this morning, trying to clarify her role in the state department videoeleted. she released a statement saying she had no knowledge of cutting her briefing transcripts. but our chief washington correspondent james rosen e-mailed her, saying this. quote, the briefing transcript remained unaltered the entire time. do you want to issue a revised statement asserting the same for the video which was altered? well, she fired back, writing, quote, hopefully, you will find the time to spend on the range of global events happening in the world in between attacking my character. and those are your headlines. >> it was a perfectly logical thing for him to bring up, because she was referring to the edit of the transcript, not the video. the trap -- transcript was fine, but the video wasn't. >>> coming up a decorated general blocked from a prayer breakfast at a military base because of his conservative values. lieutenant general jerry boykin is going to react. >> by the way, do you notice anything funny about the yearbook photos? they're all wearing the same shirt. >>

. >> this comes as jen psaki gave out a statement saying she had no knowledge nor approved of any format the state department. what's your reaction to their responses? >> when this came to light, they said it was a glitch in the system although if you look at it, that's the example when there's a white flash of something being edited out. they tried to get away with saying it's a glitch in the system. a huge coincidence if that was the case. that's not the case. only when it was clear that the position was untenable, we don't know who asked for it, it's a mystery. when that's not something that the american people are going to buy for a second. >> did you do this or didn't you? they haven't answered yet. hope congress can. good to see you. >> let's say you don't want to vote for hillary or trump or bernie. frank luntz says it will be about none of the above voters. who they are and what they might do. that's next. with usaa is awesome. homeowners insurance life insurance automobile insurance i spent 20 years active duty they still refer to me as "gunnery sergeant" when i call being a u