i think his name is jerry coined jerry cohn and he says that you're under your leadership, scientific american has neglected science in favor of pushing a progressive id. ology, does he have a point there? i mean, is there, as you say, really a democratic version of science and the republican version of science or no, i think, yeah, yeah, jerry's either jerry has a lot of time on his hands. he spends a lot of time criticizing us. we have not neglected science, we cover, you know, all the non political science just as much as we ever did. we've got a great story coming out on lucy. the officer looked at the guess the possible. we've got a lot of coverage of dark energy, dark matter, chemistry, biology. all the science that really doesn't, you know, makes the news except when there's some great discovery in terms of what we cover that has to do with politics. we think it's our responsibility to share what we know about the science of abortion, access of transgender health care of climate science, and how important it is to expand access to the health care and how it can be live, save, a